Explosive New FBI Notes Confirm Obama Directed Anti-Flynn Operation
Explosive New FBI Notes Confirm Obama Directed Anti-Flynn Operation - Handwritten notes from fired former FBI agent Peter Strzok show that Obama himself directed key aspects of the campaign to target Flynn during a Jan. 5, 2017 meeting in the Oval Office.
Newly released notes confirm President Barack Obama’s key role in surveillance and leak operation against Michael Flynn, the incoming Trump administration national security adviser. The handwritten notes, which were first disclosed in a federal court filing made by the Department of Justice on Tuesday, show President Obama himself personally directed former FBI Director James Comey and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates to investigate Flynn for having routine phone calls with a Russian counterpart. He also suggests they withhold information from President Trump and his key national security figures.
The handwritten notes from fired former FBI agent Peter Strzok appear to describe a Jan. 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting between Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Comey, Yates, and then-national security adviser Susan Rice. The meeting and its substance were confirmed in a bizarre Inauguration Day email Rice wrote to herself.
It was at this meeting, which was confirmed by testimony from Comey and Yates, that Obama gave guidance to key officials who would be tasked with protecting his administration’s utilization of secretly funded Clinton campaign research, which alleged Trump was involved in a treasonous plot to collude with Russia, from being discovered or stopped by the incoming administration.
Yates told the special counsel that Obama broke the news of Flynn’s phone calls with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak to her during the Jan. 5 meeting. Yates detailed further involvement from Obama. “President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia,” she wrote in her email.
The new notes, which record Comey’s accounting to Strzok of the meeting’s substance, constitute definitive evidence that Obama himself was personally directing significant aspects of a criminal investigation into his political enemy’s top foreign policy adviser. An image of the notes is reproduced below. This is a rough transcript of the unredacted portion of the notes:
Direct Link
Peter Strzok's Notes Co... by The Federalist on Scribd
NSA-D-DAG = [Flynn cuts?]. Other countries
D-DAG: lean forward on [unclass?]
VP: “Logan Act”
P: These are unusual times
VP: I’ve been on the intel cmte for ten years and I never
P: Make sure you look at things + have the right people on it
P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition team?
D: Flynn –> Kislyak calls but appear legit
[illegible] Happy New Year. Yeah right
“Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it,” Obama is quoted as saying.
Comey’s description that the Flynn-Kislyak phone calls appear “legit,” shorthand for “legitimate,” is also in the notes. Until this week, this exculpatory information was withheld from Flynn and his defense team, multiple congressional committees, and the American public. A lengthy campaign to illegally leak selectively edited defamatory information through media accessories damaged the Trump administration and spurred the appointment of a special counsel to investigate anyone associated with the Trump campaign.
According to Strzok’s notes, Biden explicitly referenced the Logan Act, an 18th-century law that forbids certain political speech from private citizens. The law, even if it were constitutional, would not apply to a national security adviser for the newly elected president of the United States. Biden had previously denied that he knew anything about the investigation into Flynn.
The meeting to strategize against the Trump administration included just a few key law enforcement principals. Their testimony about what transpired is sometimes in conflict. Yates claimed Comey brought up the Logan Act while Comey claims Biden cited it. Rice claimed Obama directed that the anti-Trump operation be run “by the book,” but Comey claimed Obama even directed which personnel to use.
All parties agree, however, on the main substance of the meeting, which was a discussion of how to target Flynn for his “legit” phone calls and withhold vital national security information from the newly elected presidential administration.
Attorney General William Barr has directed an investigation into the spying and leaking operation, led by U.S. Attorney John Durham. Durham, whose investigation is ongoing, has not yet issued any indictments or any reports of his findings thus far. Barr has repeatedly stated that if Durham finds evidence of criminal wrongdoing that can be proved in a court beyond a reasonable doubt, then those responsible for the criminal acts will be held to account.
The handwritten notes from Strzok, which were included in a court filing from the Justice Department, were filed under seal by order of Emmett Sullivan, the judge overseeing Flynn’s criminal trial. The judge has ordered the documents to be hidden and has given no indication that he will ever allow all of the evidence filed by the DOJ to be publicly disclosed. When the DOJ moved to dismiss charges against Flynn, Sullivan refused to grant their request and instead appointed a shadow prosecutor to target Flynn on Sullivan’s behalf.
Following an appeal by Flynn, the top federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday ordered the judge to dismiss all charges against Flynn. That court also vacated his appointment of a shadow prosecutor to target Flynn.
Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Thursday, June 25, 2020
Obamagate Begins...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
39 comments:
I have no problem with a criminal being targeted. It's a good thing that this was being handled at the highest level. If Mitch McConnell had cooperated we might have been able to stop the Russian theft of the 2016 election.
Barack Obama warned Mitch McConnell the Russians were interfering. He warned Dotard not to hire Flynn. The crimes are on the republican side. Investigating those crimes should be a major focus of the Biden administration.
When the Stolypin car/wagon comes for you, I hope that you remember this moment and enjoy the ride.
That is what I have to fear if Dotard manages to steal a 2nd term? I know you'll be cheering if/when ameriKKKa's enemies are rounded up.
Sorry, but unlike the Left, I can tolerate non-purity in both skin colour AND ideology.
Of course. That's why you support the White Nationalist predisent.
Trump isn't a white nationalist. He's a nationalist for all colours. As he often states, "ALL Lives Matter!" :)
That's how you identify the racists. They say "all lives matter". And, if pressed, often they will refuse to say "Black lives matter".
A majority of American citizens know Dotard is a racist. Most of the rest of the citizens of the world knows Dotard is a racist :P
...in you deranged mind.
You don't even know what racism is.
I am very glad I don't agree with your perverted view of what racism is.
Racism in you world means Blacks are never wrong, even when it's criminal.
Run up to and Knockout an unsuspecting 16 year old white girl on a city street, it's a game. Riot and Loot a store, it's a reaction to injustice. Kill a cop, it's retaliation for lynching's 100 years ago.
When are you going to grant them individual agency, you patronizing racist?
Your BS mind reading has nothing to do with me. And that you believe Black people (as a community) are accepting of these criminal acts proves that YOU are the racist.
...explaining why the Marxist psyop currently known as BLM will ultimately fail and their backlash against patronizing neoliberal whites such as yourself, severe.
Wrong on both counts. BLM is a continuation of the civil rights movement. And I'm strongly opposed to neoliberalism. Why I supported Bernie Sanders -- the candidate with the lifelong record of voting against job-killing free trade agreements. You are so full of shit it oozes from your pores. The backlash will be against racists like Dotard and their supporters.
BLM is a Jesse Jackson/ Al Sharpton Rainbow Coalition style corporate shakedown/ extortion operation. Its Ll about the Benajims and has SQUAT to do with civil rights.
You are just a tool dervy, a proverbial useful idiot.
Fighting for equality isn't a "shakedown". You characterize it as such because of your racist desire to delegitimize BLM and preserve your White privilege. It's your fear and hatred that causes you act as a useful idiot for Dotard (and Putin).
Equality to resist arrest... your new "civil right." LOL!
You highlighted that inequality when you pointed out that African Americans are more frequently charged with the "crime" of being arrested while Black (aka "resisting"). In any case, the job of the police is to Protect and Serve. That includes protecting the people they are arresting. Suspects are also citizens with full Constitutional and Human rights.
That's why they need a good thumping. They actually believe that they have "rights".
The US Constitution is real, not imaginary. If you don't believe in it you should move to Russia or some other country where citizens don't have rights. This country doesn't need America-haters like you.
lol! Try exercising your free speech "right" by screaming "fire" in a crowded theatre. You must have missed Madison's dissertation on the difference between alienable and inalienable rights.
The 8th amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. When the police only SUSPECT you of a crime, you haven't even gotten to the punishment phase yet. Yet you think they're allowed to administer thumpings when suspects have the presumption of innocence? I DID "miss it" when Madison argued to the contrary.
Your presumption of innocence ends the moment you dis the cop or try to run. After that moment, you are "guilty as hell" and deserve your thumnpin'.
The presumption of innocence remains until a jury renders a verdict or a plea deal is accepted. What you describe is how things are done in an authoritarian police state. You may wish that the US was an authoritarian police state, but it is NOT.
Law requires an authoritarian police state. For it is law which creates/ establishes the "authorities".
When I was at the Academy I learned that the laws (/Regulations) are meaningless, that the 'Authorities" can do as they please. It's not an easy lesson to accept, but it's one that anyone who is smart, will learn. The heart of authority is derived from Force, either it's current execution or memory of its' application in the past.
Quote: In political philosophy, the phrase consent of the governed refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is only justified and lawful when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised. This theory of consent is historically contrasted to the divine right of kings and had often been invoked against the legitimacy of colonialism. Article 21 of the United Nations' 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government".
We The People (the citizens who authorize the enforcement of law) do NOT consent to authorities that are ABOVE THE LAW. Obviously this explains why you have no problem with the CORRUPT Dotard administration. The rest of us do, however. And Dotard WILL be held accountable #TrumpCrimesCommission
btw, you didn't learn that those in power can do as they please because you're smart. You "learned" it because your personality type is authoritarian.
Quote: The authoritarian person also presents a cynical and disdainful view of humanity, and a need to wield power and be tough, which arise from the anxieties produced by the perceived lapses of people who do not abide by the conventions and social norms of society (destructiveness and cynicism); a general tendency to focus upon people who violate the value system, and to act oppressively against them (authoritarian aggression); anti-intellectualism, a general opposition to the subjective and imaginative tendencies of the mind (anti-intraception); a tendency to believe in mystic determination (superstition); and an exaggerated concern with sexual promiscuity. [end quote]
I say that all (if not most) of that describes you perfectly.
You held Hillary accountable? BWAH-HA-HA-HA!!!!!
The day. you hold your own accountable is the day you'll gain your first ounce of credibility.
There is nothing to hold her accountable for. btw, Democratic governor Rod Blagojevich went to prison. Dotard pardoned him.
Like I said, the day you hold your own accountable is the day you'll gain your first ounce of credibility.
So, Democratic governor Rod Blagojevich wasn't held accountable? He did serve prison time. If you aren't counting him because he got out early... that's on Dotard. Dotard is a republican, btw.
As for Hillary Clinton, PROOF she committed no crimes is the FACT that the Dotard administration has charged her with NOTHING. What about the "lock her up" chants? Are republican administrations forbidden from prosecuting Democratic crimes?
FYI, Rod Blagojevich went to prison when Obama was president. Obama didn't pardon him.
Didn't Trump's lawyer go to prison? lol!
Nope, no pardon either.
Because he turned on him. That isn't proof of republicans holding their own accountable. Unless you mean accountable for doing the right thing. Dotard cronies who do the wrong thing by continuing to lie for their corrupt boss ALL get rewarded. Manafort released from prison because of the coronavirus even though there was no outbreak at the prison where he was being held. Roger Stone's sentence was commuted. No pardon because that involves admitting guilt. After which he could be compelled to testify (because a pardon involves admitting guilt. Therefore you can no longer incriminate yourself).
Your example PROVES Dotard's corruption.
A judge just ordered Cohen released from prison. It seems Toady Barr said he could only be released if he didn't write a book exposing Dotard. A book Cohen is working on and which apparently will be released before the election. Clearly Cohen knows things that could harm Dotard's re-election chances. Hence the corrupt attempt to stop him from releasing it.
Criminals are allowed to profit on the pain and suffering of their victims now by writing books and pocketing profits? Who knew?
Post a Comment