Sunday, February 22, 2026

The Covid Vaccine is Still Killing Americans

from Google AI:
Fibrinogen (Factor I) is a vital liver-produced plasma protein (normal range–) that plays a key role in blood clotting (hemostasis) and wound healing. It is converted by thrombin into insoluble fibrin, creating a mesh network to stabilize platelet plugs and stop bleeding. Low levels (hypofibrinogenemia) can cause excessive bleeding, while high levels are linked to inflammation and thrombosis.

Key Fibrinogen Functions and Role 
  • Blood Clotting: Acts as the primary structural component of blood clots, providing strength to the initial platelet plug.   
  • Wound Healing: Mediates cell spreading and facilitates tissue repair.   
  • Inflammation Marker: Levels often rise in response to infection, inflammation, or tissue trauma   
  • Antithrombin Activity: Helps regulate clotting by binding to and limiting thrombin activity.
Normal Range and Clinical Significance
Normal Levels: 200 to 400 mg/dL (adults). 
Critical Low Levels: <100 mg/dl 
High Levels (>400 mg/dl): Generally indicate inflammation, infection, pregnancy, or increased risk of cardiovascular disease/stroke.

 Causes of Low Fibrinogen (Hypofibrinogenemia)

  • Inherited/Congenital: Rare genetic disorders (afibrinogenemia).  

  • Acquired: Severe liver disease, malnutrition, DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation), or severe bleeding/trauma (consumption of clotting factors).

Symptoms of Low Fibrinogen
  • Prolonged or abnormal bleeding, particularly after trauma or surgery.
  • Easy bruising.
  • Mucous membrane bleeding (e.g., nosebleeds, gum bleeding).
  • In severe, cases, risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Diagnostic Tests
Fibrinogen Activity Test (Clauss Method): Measures how well fibrinogen functions in creating a clot. 
Antigen Test: Measures the total amount of fibrinogen present.


from Google AI:
Thrombosis is the dangerous formation of a blood clot (thrombus) inside a vein or artery, obstructing blood flow. It often causes pain, swelling, and warmth (usually in the leg) or serious conditions like stroke, heart attack, and pulmonary embolism. Treatment involves blood thinners (anticoagulants), clot-busters, or surgery. Key risk factors include immobility, surgery, cancer, and smoking.

Types of Thrombosis 
Symptoms of Thrombosis - Symptoms vary by location, but generally include:
  • Leg/Arm (DVT): Swelling, pain (often cramping), tenderness, and warm skin.
  • Lung (PE): Sudden shortness of breath, chest pain, rapid heart rate, and coughing up blood.
  • Brain (Stroke): Sudden weakness, numbness, confusion, and difficulty speaking.

Causes and Risk Factors 
Thrombosis often occurs due to injury, illness, or genetic factors that make blood more prone to clotting (thrombophilia). Key factors include:
  • Immobility: Long periods of sitting, hospital stays, or bed rest.
  • Medical Conditions: Cancer, pregnancy, and inflammatory diseases.
  • Procedures: Major or orthopedic surgery.
  • Lifestyle & Age: Smoking, obesity, and advanced age.
  • Medications: Oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy.
Treatment and Prevention 
  • Medication: Anticoagulants (blood thinners) are the primary treatment to prevent further growth and reduce risk of embolisms.
  • Procedures: Clot-busting drugs (thrombolytics) or mechanical removal (catheter-directed thrombolysis).
  • Prevention: Staying active, wearing compression stockings, and managing weight.

24 comments:

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Why is rfkjr helping cover this up?

Joe Conservative said...

Good question. My wife is currently having severe vascular problems in her lower legs that doctors are unwilling to explain, with some even discouraging her from looking into them. i think we need to find a new doctor.

Joe Conservative said...

I suspect that the mRNA vaccine has introduced a protein folding problem (chirality) leading to the structural problems we're seeing in the clots... like in the Thalilomide babies in the 50s/60s.

Joe Conservative said...

...only this time it's migrated into the blood circulatory and immune system.

Joe Conservative said...

We need Alphafold working on it... which is why this is the only AI that is currently proven actually useful.

Joe Conservative said...

Fibrinogen issues resulting in molecules depleted in sulfur and enriched in phosphorous...

Anonymous said...

Those Pathetic Democrats Constantly have with a SCOWL on their Face , and a pile of lies ready to insult our President. They can't possibly ever be Happy with the fabulous way President Trump has accomplished all those marvelous things that has made our country great again
because their side didn’t do it.

Anonymous said...

DAVE DUBYA why don’t you Get The Hell Out Of Here, And Go Back to that SHIT-HOUSE That You Came From, or Go to that Progressive Blog Where Creeps Like You Belong!

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Minus: I suspect that the mRNA vaccine has introduced a protein folding problem (chirality) leading to the structural problems we're seeing in the clots... like in the Thalilomide babies in the 50s/60s.

Copilot says you suspect incorrectly.

🤖Is his specific theory plausible?

He’s proposing:

mRNA vaccine → protein folding / chirality problem → structural clot issues.

Like thalidomide → vascular damage in his wife’s legs.

Problems with that:

mRNA vaccines don’t behave like thalidomide

Chirality in that sense applies to small molecules, not big vaccine‑encoded proteins in this way.

Known vaccine‑related clotting mechanisms don’t match his description.

Vascular problems in the legs have many more common causes (age, genetics, smoking, diabetes, immobility, prior COVID infection, other meds, etc.).

Could his wife’s issues be serious and real? Absolutely. Does his explanation match current evidence? No.🛑

FYI, rfkjr isn't covering this up because the excess death data IS still being published.

Your post originally read, "...and this is why the CDC in America and NHS in UK have Stopped Publishing Excess Death Data".

You removed this because you realized this claim is false (which it is)?

🤖Copilot: The CDC has not stopped publishing excess‑death data. Some dashboards were retired or moved, but the underlying mortality data and excess‑death estimates are still available. The UK still publishes mortality and excess‑death data through the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The NHS isn’t the primary publisher of that data; ONS is.🛑

Joe Conservative said...

I removed the UK claim because I didn't experience it personally. The removal of the CDC data is real and only available to researchers, not the general public as it once was.

from Google AI:

CDC death index data, primarily through the National Death Index (NDI), is not available to the general public for personal, legal, or genealogy purposes. Access is restricted solely to qualified researchers conducting approved medical or public health studies. Publicly available mortality data is limited to aggregated, anonymized statistics via CDC WONDER.

Joe Conservative said...

btw - To prevent searches to the NDI, they've also begun charging fees "per record searched"...

Cost of searches
NDI search fees consist of a base service charge, plus an additional fee per user record. Base service charges are higher for the NDI Plus service. The additional fee per user record varies by the type of search requested.

NDI is fully funded through user fees; it receives no appropriated funds. User fees have covered all NDI operating expenses since the service was launched. Jurisdictions also receive a portion of the NDI user fees.

The base service charge for initial submission of one or more records is $350. Any more submissions for the same approved application will incur a $100 service charge per submission.

The following rates can be used to estimate per record costs.

Routine search
$0.15 per subject per year searched
Unknown search
$0.21 per subject per year searched
Known search
$5.00 per subject flat rate, regardless of number of years searched
Certificate search
$2.50 per subject flat rate, regardless of the years searched

Joe Conservative said...

The fees for routine NDI searches consist of a $350.00 service charge plus $0.15 per user record for each year of death searched. For example, 1,000 records searched against 10 years would cost $350 + ($0.15 x 1,000 x 10) or $1,850. Fees for the NDI Plus service are slightly higher ($0.21) per record.

Joe Conservative said...

btw - You can't just search the Death Index for anything...

The NDI is not open to the general public and is restricted to for-pay, approved, statistical, and medical research purposes

Oficialistas only! Searching for Covid harm... definitely NOT approved.

Joe Conservative said...

Access Requirements: The NDI, managed by the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), is only available to qualified investigators for approved studies. Researchers must submit an application that undergoes a 2–3 month review process, and data is only released for statistical purposes in health studies, not for legal or personal investigative purpose.

btw - Nellie Ohr can query the NSA database as an FBI contractor to see if you've ever been suspected of being peed on by a Russian prostitute though. Jes sayin'...

Joe Conservative said...

ps - Google's AI now gets little "oficialista' ratings from the oficialistas on its' responses (like from the CDC). Nothing like having the AI chickens being in charge of the AI henhouse, I always say!

Joe Conservative said...

...and searching the database for LEGAL purposes (ie - Vaccine Harm) is off the table. Call it "affirmative action" for Big Pharma.

Joe Conservative said...

btw - How many years did it take researchers to prove that cigarettes caused cancer? It must have been a "legality" case (but not a valid/ approved research study topic)

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Minus: CDC death index data, primarily through the National Death Index (NDI), is not available to the general public...

🤖Copilot response...

Your blog author is mixing up two completely different things: (1) the National Death Index (NDI), which has never been public, AND (2) excess‑death reporting, which is still published publicly by both CDC and NHS/ONS.

They’re treating the NDI’s long‑standing access rules as if they were evidence that “excess death data has stopped being published,” which is simply not true.

✅1. Is the CDC still publishing excess‑death data?

Yes. The CDC continues to publish excess‑death data publicly through: CDC WONDER (their mortality database). NCHS Excess Deaths dashboards. Data.CDC.gov (although one dataset stopped updating in 2023, it explicitly says the data moved to WONDER).

CDC’s Excess Deaths dashboard is still active and provides weekly estimates. [CDC](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm)

CDC notes that although one dataset stopped updating in 2023, “similar data are accessible from wonder.cdc.gov.” [Data.CDC.gov](https://data.cdc.gov/National-Center-for-Health-Statistics/Excess-Deaths-Associated-with-COVID-19/xkkf-xrst)

CDC’s COVID‑19 public datasets remain available. [Data.CDC.gov](https://data.cdc.gov/)

So the claim “CDC stopped publishing excess death data” is **false**.

✅2. Is the NHS/UK government still publishing excess‑death data?

Yes. The UK changed methodology in 2024, but did not stop publishing.

OHID (England) announced changes to excess‑mortality reporting in Feb 2024, not discontinuation. [GOV.UK](https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/excess-mortality-within-england-post-pandemic-method/changes-to-ohids-reporting-of-excess-mortality-in-england)

ONS (UK) also updated its methodology in 2024 but continues to publish excess‑death estimates. [Office for National Statistics](https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024)

NHS Digital continues to publish statistical datasets and open data. [NHS Digital](https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/statistical-publications-open-data-and-data-products)

So the claim “NHS stopped publishing excess death data” is also false.

✅3. What about the blog’s argument about the National Death Index (NDI)?

Everything they wrote about the NDI is true — but irrelevant.

Here’s why: The NDI has never been public.

It has always required: an approved research application. Fees. Restricted use
No personal searches. No legal/genealogy use.

This is not new, not COVID‑related, and not evidence of hiding excess‑death data.

The NDI is a record‑level matching service, not a public statistics portal. Excess‑death reporting uses aggregated mortality counts, which *are* public.

The blog author is confusing: NDI (A fee‑based record‑matching service for researchers)... This has has never been public and isn't relevant to excess‑death reporting.

WITH...

CDC WONDER / NCHS dashboards (Aggregated mortality statistics) AND ONS/OHID excess‑death reports (UK excess‑mortality publications)... Which is public and relevant to excess‑death reporting (and doesn't require fees).

The existence of NDI fees has nothing to do with whether excess‑death data is published.

✅4. Did CDC “prevent searches” by charging fees?

No — because: The NDI has *always* charged fees. The NDI is not a search engine for the public. Excess‑death reporting does not require NDI access.

The blog author is implying a conspiracy where none exists.

✅5. Did CDC or NHS stop publishing excess‑death data?

No. Both continue to publish excess‑death data, though the UK changed methodology in 2024 and CDC moved one dataset to WONDER.🛑

Joe Conservative said...

AND (2) excess‑death reporting, which is still published publicly by both CDC and NHS/ONS.

Yes, but the new data is no longer the same data. The "predictions" of excess deaths are no longer included, so no one can now tell what the "surplus" excess deaths are (as was important during Covid). It's like the Maryland Educational Standard Test program. Every five years (of declining test performance) they revised the test and set a new standard. It was done to prevent citizens from gaining an understanding that the declines were due to the poor and declining performance of Maryland Educators despite thirty years ever increasing Educators salary and budgets dedicated to Public Schools vastly in excess of the Cost of Living Index.

Joe Conservative said...

ps- The WONDER data from after the pandemic ended has YET to be finalized per their new 'ANNUAL" standard and is still labelled as "tentative" and subject to adjustments. Why is that?

Joe Conservative said...

...and why change from stating weekly and monthly data to "quarterly". This is the Information Age. Data should be MORE timely, not LESS!

Joe Conservative said...

In other words, the cover up continues!

Joe Conservative said...

So why is the old data only available though "Our Word in Data" and not WONDER/ CDC?

>Excess deaths have consistently exceeded predictions throughout the pandemic, with P-scores (percentage above expected) for certain periods and regions sometimes reaching 100% or higher, indicating twice the expected deaths. In the US, for example, 46% of deaths among people under 65 in recent years would not have occurred if US death rates aligned with peer nations, indicating a sustained, high percentage of excess mortality.

Our World in Data
Our World in Data
+1

Pandemic Peaks: In early pandemic phases, some locations saw daily or weekly deaths at 100% or higher than projected figures.

Continued Surge: Data through 2023 indicated that despite declining from 2020/2021 highs, excess mortality remained elevated in the US compared to other high-income countries.

Context: These calculations are based on P-scores, which measure the percentage difference between observed and projected deaths.

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

You are clearly not one to be disuaded from your delusions by facts.