Tuesday, January 13, 2026

Renee Good was a Trained Terrorist

2 comments:

Steve said...

For years now, the Democratic, Socialist, Communists have treated immigration like a movie, or a stage play instead of a policy problem. Reality, history, economics, and geopolitics were shoved aside in favor of slogans, hashtags, and virtue signaling. The result? A border in chaos and a hemisphere in flames. Immigration didn’t “just happen.” It was engineered by neglect, denial, and a willful refusal to confront the actual causes driving people north.

While President “Sleepy Joe” Biden handed the Boarder Problem to the “So-Called”Vice President Kamala “Laughing Hynena” Harris with the vague directive to find the So-Called “Root Causes,” Democrats predictably missed the obvious. The ‘Root Cause’ wasn’t climate change, or corporate greed, or some abstract American sin. It was dictatorship, corruption, and failed states across Latin America that Democrats either excused, enabled, or actively coddled.
Remember Argentina, Venezuela, Colombia, and Cuba didn’t collapse by accident.

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

The lying Turd Tim Pool is a vile lying Turd. btw, he is also a Turd that lies and is vile.

🤖Via Copilot...

Here’s the clean, grounded fact‑check based strictly on the reporting available in the search results you triggered. I’ll keep it structured so you can see exactly what is verified and what is invented or distorted.

🟦 **1. Did Renee Good’s “circle” declare a “micro‑intifada”?**

There is **no evidence** in any credible reporting that:

- Renee Good.
- her friends.
- her family.
- or any activist group connected to her.

...ever declared anything called a **“micro‑intifada”** against ICE.

Nothing in the fact‑checked reporting mentions this phrase at all. It appears to be **commentary rhetoric**, not a factual description of any real event.

🟩 **2. Was Renee Good a “trained terrorist”?**

Again, **no evidence** supports this.

What *is* documented is that **false information** circulated online after her death:

- A **fake criminal record** was spread on social media and debunked by Snopes.
- A **doctored image** was circulated to make her appear to mock Charlie Kirk’s death; this was also debunked.
- A **false claim** about the ICE agent’s identity was debunked.

None of the fact‑checked reporting shows any link between Good and terrorism, training, extremist groups, or organized violence.

The blog title you saw (“Renee Good was a Trained Terrorist”) is **not supported by any factual reporting**.

🟧 **3. Was the shooting “completely justified from a lawful perspective”?**
Here’s what the verified reporting shows:

✔️ **The shooting was ruled a homicide**

Snopes confirms the ICE shooting of Renee Good was the **first recorded homicide** in Minneapolis in 2026.

A homicide is not automatically a crime — but it is not the same as “justified.”

✔️ **Video analysis contradicts the claim that she tried to run over the agent**

A fact‑check from Deutsche Welle, Germany’s international public broadcaster shows:

- Good’s wheels were **turned away** from the ICE agent.
- She was **steering away**, not toward him.
- Trump’s claim that she tried to run him over was **false**

Snopes independently confirmed the same thing: the image claiming her car was aimed at the agent was **fake**.

So the factual record contradicts the idea that the shooting was clearly justified.

✔️ **As of the reporting, the officer had not been charged**

Snopes notes that the officer had not been charged at the time of publication.

That is not the same as “completely justified.”

It simply means the investigation was ongoing.

❗ **Stephen A. Smith’s alleged quote does not appear in any fact‑checked reporting**

None of the sources mention Stephen A. Smith commenting on the case.
If he said something on his show, it is **not part of the verified reporting**.

🟥 **4. Are people “trying really hard to justify her murder”?**

Based on the fact‑checked reporting:

✔️ There *is* a pattern of misinformation being used to justify the shooting:

- Fake criminal record circulated.
- Doctored image circulated.
- False claim about her car aiming at the agent.
- False claim about the agent’s identity.
- False claim that she tried to run him over.

This is not speculation — it is documented.

So your impression that some people are working hard to justify the shooting is **supported by the evidence**.

🟫 **Bottom line**

**Verified facts from the reporting:**

- No evidence she was a terrorist.
- No evidence of a “micro‑intifada.”
- Multiple pieces of misinformation were spread to portray her as dangerous.
- Video analysis contradicts claims that she attacked the agent.
- The shooting was ruled a homicide.
- The officer had not been charged at the time of reporting.

Your instinct that the rhetoric you saw is part of a narrative effort — not a factual one — is consistent with the verified reporting.🛑