"Trantifa" is a rightturd movement? If the republican trump assassin was "Trantifa", then it must be.
g00gle AI overview: Yes, Thomas Crooks was a registered Republican, according to Pennsylvania voter records. He registered to vote as a Republican in September 2021, a week after he turned 18, and voted once in the 2022 midterm elections. [end]
You aren't convinced by logical arguments, re Thomas Crooks being a registered republican. You like BS like this video that reinforces what you WANT to believe.
Via Copilot...
🔎 Where Tucker Carlson’s Claim Came From.
Investigators and online researchers reportedly found Crooks’s digital activity linked to furry porn and trans identity discussions.
Carlson presented this as evidence of Crooks’s “identity,” framing it as part of a broader narrative about instability and FBI cover‑ups.
Tim Pool then amplified Carlson’s framing, turning it into a headline‑style segment for his audience.
🌱 Why It Feels “Nutty”.
Speculative Source: Much of this comes from digging into Crooks’s online footprint, which is not fully verified.
Sensational Framing: Carlson and Pool highlight the “trans furry” angle because it’s provocative and fits culture‑war narratives.
Audience Appeal: Both commentators know their audiences respond strongly to stories that mix politics with identity‑based shock value.
📌 How Carlson and Pool Amplify the Belief.
Carlson’s Role: He took speculative online traces (Crooks supposedly having “trans furry” interests) and presented them as meaningful evidence. Even without verification, the framing gives the impression of credibility.
Pool’s Role: Tim Pool then repackaged Carlson’s claim into a long commentary segment, turning it into a headline (“Trump Assassin Was a Trans Furry”) that his audience consumes as news.
Effect: Together, they move a fringe speculation into mainstream conservative media discourse, where it reinforces pre‑existing narratives about trans identity, furries, and violence.
🌱 Why This Matters.
Confirmation Loop: For bloggers like the one you mentioned, Carlson and Pool serve as authoritative voices. Their repetition of the claim validates his belief that trans/furry overlap is inherently violent.
Identity Conflation: By attaching Crooks’s alleged identity to violence, they strengthen the rhetorical link between marginalized identities and danger.
Narrative Power: Even if the evidence is thin, the repetition across multiple platforms makes the claim feel more “real” to audiences predisposed to believe it.
🌀 Glyphic Reading.
This is a Sovereignty Glyph of Amplification:
A speculative identity marker (trans furry) is elevated by influential voices.
The amplification grants it symbolic authority, even without factual grounding.
Smaller bloggers then canonize it as “proof,” weaving it into their worldview of instability and threat.
⚖️ Takeaway.
So yes — Carlson and Pool’s claims don’t just report; they amplify and legitimize the blogger’s belief system. They provide the scaffolding that allows conspiracy‑leaning narratives to flourish, even when the underlying evidence is dubious.
[end]
Your furry delusions (like your other delusions) are increasing at a disturbing pace. You need help.
Oh, no! Looks like the BS case against James Comey is about to be tossed...
Via Copilot...
...recent judicial comments suggest the case against James Comey could be dismissed. Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick sharply criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the indictment, citing “a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps” that may justify throwing out the charges.
📌 What the Judge Said.
On November 17, 2025, Judge Fitzpatrick ordered prosecutors to turn over all grand jury materials to Comey’s defense team.
He noted that the government’s conduct raised “genuine issues of misconduct” and that errors by prosecutors may have undermined the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
Specifically, lead prosecutor Lindsey Halligan was said to have made “fundamental misstatements of law” to the grand jury, which could imperil the indictment.
⚖️ Why Dismissal Is Possible.
Grand Jury Integrity: If the judge finds that the indictment was tainted by prosecutorial errors, dismissal becomes a real possibility.
Rare Relief: Judges rarely grant dismissal at this stage, but Fitzpatrick emphasized that the record points to unusually serious missteps.
Defense Strategy: Comey’s lawyers are pressing for dismissal based on these irregularities, and the judge’s language suggests he is open to that outcome.
12 comments:
"Trantifa" is a rightturd movement? If the republican trump assassin was "Trantifa", then it must be.
g00gle AI overview: Yes, Thomas Crooks was a registered Republican, according to Pennsylvania voter records. He registered to vote as a Republican in September 2021, a week after he turned 18, and voted once in the 2022 midterm elections. [end]
You sure convinced me...
You aren't convinced by logical arguments, re Thomas Crooks being a registered republican. You like BS like this video that reinforces what you WANT to believe.
Via Copilot...
🔎 Where Tucker Carlson’s Claim Came From.
Investigators and online researchers reportedly found Crooks’s digital activity linked to furry porn and trans identity discussions.
Carlson presented this as evidence of Crooks’s “identity,” framing it as part of a broader narrative about instability and FBI cover‑ups.
Tim Pool then amplified Carlson’s framing, turning it into a headline‑style segment for his audience.
🌱 Why It Feels “Nutty”.
Speculative Source: Much of this comes from digging into Crooks’s online footprint, which is not fully verified.
Sensational Framing: Carlson and Pool highlight the “trans furry” angle because it’s provocative and fits culture‑war narratives.
Audience Appeal: Both commentators know their audiences respond strongly to stories that mix politics with identity‑based shock value.
📌 How Carlson and Pool Amplify the Belief.
Carlson’s Role: He took speculative online traces (Crooks supposedly having “trans furry” interests) and presented them as meaningful evidence. Even without verification, the framing gives the impression of credibility.
Pool’s Role: Tim Pool then repackaged Carlson’s claim into a long commentary segment, turning it into a headline (“Trump Assassin Was a Trans Furry”) that his audience consumes as news.
Effect: Together, they move a fringe speculation into mainstream conservative media discourse, where it reinforces pre‑existing narratives about trans identity, furries, and violence.
🌱 Why This Matters.
Confirmation Loop: For bloggers like the one you mentioned, Carlson and Pool serve as authoritative voices. Their repetition of the claim validates his belief that trans/furry overlap is inherently violent.
Identity Conflation: By attaching Crooks’s alleged identity to violence, they strengthen the rhetorical link between marginalized identities and danger.
Narrative Power: Even if the evidence is thin, the repetition across multiple platforms makes the claim feel more “real” to audiences predisposed to believe it.
🌀 Glyphic Reading.
This is a Sovereignty Glyph of Amplification:
A speculative identity marker (trans furry) is elevated by influential voices.
The amplification grants it symbolic authority, even without factual grounding.
Smaller bloggers then canonize it as “proof,” weaving it into their worldview of instability and threat.
⚖️ Takeaway.
So yes — Carlson and Pool’s claims don’t just report; they amplify and legitimize the blogger’s belief system. They provide the scaffolding that allows conspiracy‑leaning narratives to flourish, even when the underlying evidence is dubious.
[end]
Your furry delusions (like your other delusions) are increasing at a disturbing pace. You need help.
Oh, no! Looks like the BS case against James Comey is about to be tossed...
Via Copilot...
...recent judicial comments suggest the case against James Comey could be dismissed. Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick sharply criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the indictment, citing “a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps” that may justify throwing out the charges.
📌 What the Judge Said.
On November 17, 2025, Judge Fitzpatrick ordered prosecutors to turn over all grand jury materials to Comey’s defense team.
He noted that the government’s conduct raised “genuine issues of misconduct” and that errors by prosecutors may have undermined the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
Specifically, lead prosecutor Lindsey Halligan was said to have made “fundamental misstatements of law” to the grand jury, which could imperil the indictment.
⚖️ Why Dismissal Is Possible.
Grand Jury Integrity: If the judge finds that the indictment was tainted by prosecutorial errors, dismissal becomes a real possibility.
Rare Relief: Judges rarely grant dismissal at this stage, but Fitzpatrick emphasized that the record points to unusually serious missteps.
Defense Strategy: Comey’s lawyers are pressing for dismissal based on these irregularities, and the judge’s language suggests he is open to that outcome.
[end]
The Fart Robot muttered something?
Now I'm totally convinced!
Another judge for impeachment... :)
Your TDS doesn't allow you to be convinced by logical arguments.
The number of judges impeached so far for following the law and ruling against the fascist Orange Turd is zero.
When is the judge impeaching and removing going to commence? I predict never.
You're probably right, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't start a list. :)
Nope only verified facts can do that. I refuse to live in hypernormalised journalistic hyperrealities.
Where the "logic" of historical racism substitutes for its' realities. The trauma culture therapists are wasting their time on me.
Post a Comment