Nope. F**k fascism and the movers of the unethical oppressive tyrannical powe lust that drive it. And f**k Judaism and Zionist Christianity as well as they both support fascism and empire.
The blog reply claiming “the House bill already passed” is incorrect. The bill has not passed the House, Senate, or been signed into law. It’s still in the early legislative stage, referred to multiple committees including Judiciary, Intelligence, and Foreign Affairs.
As for “ending the War on Terror", that’s a rhetorical stylization. The bill doesn’t formally end any military authorization or foreign policy doctrine -- it focuses strictly on domestic surveillance rollback.
The American Privacy Restoration Act (H.R. 3245) is stylized as a sweeping repeal of the PATRIOT Act, but its legislative trajectory is already showing signs of Procedural Stasis Drift -- where bold bills are introduced for symbolic resonance but never reach the floor.
...there’s no public statement from Donald Trump indicating that he would sign the American Privacy Restoration Act (H.R. 3245), nor any evidence that he’s endorsed it.
In fact, recent reporting suggests the opposite stylization drift:
Trump’s administration has taken steps that weaken data privacy protections, such as rolling back rules that would’ve restricted data brokers from selling personal information.
His broader surveillance posture -- especially around immigration and digital vetting—leans toward expansion, not rollback.
There’s no mention of H.R. 3245 in his public speeches, executive orders, or legislative priorities.
So your prediction -- that the bill won’t pass, and that Trump wouldn’t sign it even if it did -- is grounded in both procedural logic and stylistic precedent.
The fascist Drumph regime wants MORE power invested in the government (Drumph). Therefore it is unlikely the fascist Drumph will do anything that dilutes his ot his regime's power.
Drumph is an unrepentant asshole and authoritarian.
You scream about the fascism Congress granted Trump under the AUMF and Patriot Acts... but do nothing to repeal fascism. Why is that, Les? Why aren't you screaming at Democrats, who have controlled the "fascist government" completely multiple times since? Enquiring minds wish to know....
I did not support Bush Jr's Patriot Act, I do not support ICE, I do not support Zionist genocide, I do not support TSA, i also do not support y I urge fascist authoritarian moron either.
So, stuff your BS because that is exactly what it is.
You're outside the law in your opinions, Derv. Is that what makes you "not a fascist". You support the bellum omni contra omnes. Got it.
As for me, I like law (fascism - State power). Most people do. When you attend protests, do you wear the Blac Bloc uniform? Hurray for fascist hypocrisies! Acta non Verba!
The fasces are prominently displayed on either side of the Speaker's rostrum in the U.S. House of Representatives as symbols of civic authority and the strength of unity. Derived from ancient Rome, the bundle of rods represents that individual states, like single rods, are weak but become strong when bound together, symbolizing the principle of "E pluribus unum" (Out of many, one). The fasces, sometimes featuring an axe and sometimes a laurel branch, remind representatives that their authority is amplified by the many people they represent
19 comments:
What about after king donald? Will the next United States monarch be king james donald?
Demented and dementia suffering king donnie will likely be attempting to elevate his jackass son to the throne. By "divine" ascension he will rise!
No, it'll be Don Jr. a hereditary presidency from that point on.
Right on! Continuity of government today after the WoT and Patriot Act is much more important than democracy! Just look to Ukraine and Moldova.
Nope. F**k fascism and the movers of the unethical oppressive tyrannical powe lust that drive it. And f**k Judaism and Zionist Christianity as well as they both support fascism and empire.
Of course, a tRump supporting purveyor of conspiracy and rightwing fascist propaganda.
Just think...110 USAID funded TRUTH Social and media literacy outlets in Moldova keeping OUT Russian interference! America doesn't do "propaganda. Only TRUTH with a capital 'T'! 'T' as in TRUMP!
king donald is ending the WoT and Patriot Act? When is this happening?
but hey, $60 billion in USAID for USIC "capacity building" in the name of overthrowing democratic, but anti-US, regimes is just PEACHY! Stop fascism.
Did I ever tell you that I was an ANTI-Anti-fascist?
Muh! Democracy!
The House bill already passed this year.
Minus: The House bill already passed this year.
It did not.
Via Copilot...
The blog reply claiming “the House bill already passed” is incorrect. The bill has not passed the House, Senate, or been signed into law. It’s still in the early legislative stage, referred to multiple committees including Judiciary, Intelligence, and Foreign Affairs.
As for “ending the War on Terror", that’s a rhetorical stylization. The bill doesn’t formally end any military authorization or foreign policy doctrine -- it focuses strictly on domestic surveillance rollback.
The American Privacy Restoration Act (H.R. 3245) is stylized as a sweeping repeal of the PATRIOT Act, but its legislative trajectory is already showing signs of Procedural Stasis Drift -- where bold bills are introduced for symbolic resonance but never reach the floor.
...there’s no public statement from Donald Trump indicating that he would sign the American Privacy Restoration Act (H.R. 3245), nor any evidence that he’s endorsed it.
In fact, recent reporting suggests the opposite stylization drift:
Trump’s administration has taken steps that weaken data privacy protections, such as rolling back rules that would’ve restricted data brokers from selling personal information.
His broader surveillance posture -- especially around immigration and digital vetting—leans toward expansion, not rollback.
There’s no mention of H.R. 3245 in his public speeches, executive orders, or legislative priorities.
So your prediction -- that the bill won’t pass, and that Trump wouldn’t sign it even if it did -- is grounded in both procedural logic and stylistic precedent.
[end]
lol!
In September 2025, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan amendment that repealed the 1991 and 2002 AUMFs
The fascist Drumph regime wants MORE power invested in the government (Drumph). Therefore it is unlikely the fascist Drumph will do anything that dilutes his ot his regime's power.
Drumph is an unrepentant asshole and authoritarian.
You scream about the fascism Congress granted Trump under the AUMF and Patriot Acts... but do nothing to repeal fascism. Why is that, Les? Why aren't you screaming at Democrats, who have controlled the "fascist government" completely multiple times since? Enquiring minds wish to know....
You're the one supporting fascism. Not me.
I did not support Bush Jr's Patriot Act, I do not support ICE, I do not support Zionist genocide, I do not support TSA, i also do not support y I urge fascist authoritarian moron either.
So, stuff your BS because that is exactly what it is.
You're outside the law in your opinions, Derv. Is that what makes you "not a fascist". You support the bellum omni contra omnes. Got it.
As for me, I like law (fascism - State power). Most people do. When you attend protests, do you wear the Blac Bloc uniform? Hurray for fascist hypocrisies! Acta non Verba!
The fasces are prominently displayed on either side of the Speaker's rostrum in the U.S. House of Representatives as symbols of civic authority and the strength of unity. Derived from ancient Rome, the bundle of rods represents that individual states, like single rods, are weak but become strong when bound together, symbolizing the principle of "E pluribus unum" (Out of many, one). The fasces, sometimes featuring an axe and sometimes a laurel branch, remind representatives that their authority is amplified by the many people they represent
ARF ARF! ARF ARF!
Post a Comment