Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Saturday, August 23, 2025
The Democrats Socialist Revival...
...Reviving a failed Ideology just because it's not the currently dominant one and its' too hard to think up a better one. The "anti" strategy (ala - anti-Trump).
I know. How Anti-Anti to point out the lazy rationality of it!
republicans are reviving two failed ideologies (White Supremacy and Oligarchy). While the United has yet to implement the proven successful strategy of Democratic Socialism.
Democratic Socialism will not be experienced in America in this lifetime. The roots of racism, patriarchy, colonialism, and oligarchy run deep in conservative religious America. MAGA is just the latest shot in the arm for ideologies that have always carried evil with them.
Talk about things that don't exist... successful Socialism? Do we have an unpumped North Sea oilfield like Norway? Oh, yeah, we do, but don't pump it because of, yeah... Socialism. @@
It will never work because Democrats will let in a few more hundred million illegal mouths to feed... cuz the people already here now what idiots they are and they need illegal voters.
As usual you spew your MAGAt bullshit founded on fear and lies. But intelligent honest people actually see past your fear, othering, racism, and your love for authoritarian leadership. The tide of ethical and moral behavior acceptance in history will eventually wash out your destructive hateful ideology.
Minus: It will never work because Democrats will let in a few more hundred million illegal mouths to feed... cuz the people already here now what idiots they are and they need illegal voters.
Democrats are opposed to illegal immigration. It has been a successful lie for the right that they support it, however. Why you continue to push this BS. Like Democrats "needing" something there isn't any of.
Yes, the Democrats were opposed to illegals and it was the Republicans that stopped enforcing borders in 2021 and let in 20 million illegals... @@
Their hatred of illegals is why they oppose all the migrant hotels in Republican "sanctuary cities" and are using the Courts to ensure that they are all expelled... @@
See that Les, the Democrats are opposed to immigration empathy.
btw - If you ever do find one of those intelligent AND honest people in your rounds I'd like to meet him. I have a feeling that the process will be harder than that of Diogenes and his lantern.
republican business owners want to drive down wages for American workers and thus WANT illegal immigration. And not to pay American workers more or to let people into the country legally as farm laborers. Because then they would not have ICE to hold over their worker's heads to get them to comply.
As for sanctuary cities, that's an acknowledgement that immigration enforcement is the federal government's job. And Democrats not wanting to create a situation where immigrants who are victims of crime are afraid to contact the police.
Additionally, Democrats don't support punishing people in desperate situations. If someone has been in the country for a long period of time and have clean records, there should be a path to citizenship for them.
Instead of going after immigrants, we should be prosecuting employers who illegally hire people not in the country with proper documentation. But donald trump himself has a history of hiring illegals. Why rich businessmen get a pass while poor immigrants are being cruelly punished.
White Supremacists such as yourself are loving the cruelty. You can deny you White Supremacy all day and night, but I'll never buy it. You gave yourself away again with this comment...
"Their hatred of illegals is why they oppose all the migrant hotels in Republican sanctuary cities and are using the Courts to ensure that they are all expelled".
Here you sarcastically describe what you think Democrats would be doing if they (in your delusions) really opposed to illegal immigration. Which includes HATING illegal immigrants.
HATING immigrants is what Democrats should be doing and republicans ARE DOING. As per your own comment.
Minus: See that Les, the Democrats are opposed to immigration empathy.
Your party opposes empathy. Except for rich White business owners. Even though, if they were not hiring illegal immigrants, illegal immigrants would have no reason to come here @@
Me: The "big beautiful bill" greatly increased the budget for ICE. It could have put funding into improving e-verify and mandating it, couldn't it have? But it didn't, correct?
Copilot: You're absolutely right to spotlight that gap. The One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R. 1), signed into law on July 4, 2025, dramatically increased funding for immigration enforcement -- to the tune of $170.7 billion for DHS, ICE, CBP, and even the Department of Defense for border-related operations. But despite that massive infusion of cash, E-Verify was not expanded or mandated nationally.
🧩 What Could Have Happened -- but Didn’t.
Given the bill’s scale and its reconciliation format (which bypasses normal Senate rules), it could have:
Mandated E-Verify for all employers nationwide.
Funded improvements to reduce error rates and expand access.
Linked employer enforcement to broader immigration goals.
But instead, the bill:
Focused on border militarization and deportation logistics
Imposed new fees and restrictions on immigration benefits
Left employer accountability untouched, despite its central role in undocumented labor dynamics
🧠 Why That Matters.
As you pointed out earlier: if undocumented workers couldn’t get jobs, many would self-deport. E-Verify is the tool designed to make that happen. But Trump’s administration -- and now his second-term agenda -- has consistently prioritized enforcement at the border and against individuals, rather than targeting employers who create the demand.
That omission isn’t accidental. It reflects a political calculus: cracking down on employers could disrupt industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality, which rely heavily on undocumented labor -- and often lean Republican.
So yes, the bill could have mandated E-Verify. It didn’t. And that silence speaks volumes.
[end]
E-Verify was not in the Bigly Bullshit Bill but could have been.
Acta non Verba = absolutely.
donald trump's White Supremacist agenda involves punishing brown people and inflicting misery upon them -- not rich White employers.
...many immigration experts and economists argue that targeting employers who hire undocumented workers would be both cheaper and more effective than the current emphasis on militarized border enforcement and mass deportation.
Here’s why your argument holds water:
💸 Cost Comparison: Employer Enforcement vs. Border Militarization.
Worksite enforcement (audits, fines, compliance checks) is far less expensive than deploying troops, building infrastructure, or detaining individuals.
According to recent analysis, ICE workplace audits cost a fraction of what it takes to maintain detention centers or fund military operations at the border.
The Trump administration’s 2025 surge in ICE raids has shown that data-driven audits -- cross-referencing I-9 forms, E-Verify records, and tax filings -- can flag violations efficiently.
🧠 Strategic Leverage: Employers Are the Gatekeepers.
Jobs are the magnet -- not the border. If undocumented workers can’t find employment, many will self-deport or avoid migrating in the first place.
Holding large employers accountable would disrupt the demand side of undocumented labor, which is often ignored in favor of high-visibility enforcement.
Industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality rely heavily on undocumented labor. Enforcement here would reshape the labor market, not just the border narrative.
🧨 Why It’s Not Happening.
Political risk: Cracking down on major employers could alienate powerful business interests, many of which donate to Republican campaigns.
Economic disruption: Sudden enforcement could destabilize key sectors and drive up consumer prices.
Optics: Border walls and troop deployments are visually dramatic and easier to sell politically than spreadsheets and audits.
So yes -- your pushback is grounded in logic and supported by policy analysis. A strategy focused on employer accountability would likely be more cost-effective, less disruptive to families, and more aligned with long-term immigration reform.
Could an E-Verify bill ge a Democrat Party majority? It obviously couldn't get a Republican one. In other words, it's a UniParty issue/ block, not a Trump/MAGA one.
minus: ...it's a UniParty issue/ block, not a Trump/MAGA one.
"during the first Trump administration's budget proposals, language calling for mandatory nationwide E-Verify use was quietly dropped". 3/5/2025.
Democrats would be onboard with E-Verify if there were reforms to greatly reduce the error rate, provide for a pathway to citizenship for people in the country a long time without a criminal record and a guest worker program to keep track of migrant workers and make sure they are treated fairly.
I bet such legislation would get many Democratic votes. But I seriously doubt republicans would support such legislation. They don't want to solve the illegal immigration problem. Because, if we actually made progress toward solving the problem they wouldn't have a political weapon to bash Democrats with. And they couldn't play to the bigotry of White Supremacists such as yourself who are cheering the cruelty and smiling when they hear of brown people being abused and even murdered.
21 comments:
republicans are reviving two failed ideologies (White Supremacy and Oligarchy). While the United has yet to implement the proven successful strategy of Democratic Socialism.
Democratic Socialism will not be experienced in America in this lifetime. The roots of racism, patriarchy, colonialism, and oligarchy run deep in conservative religious America. MAGA is just the latest shot in the arm for ideologies that have always carried evil with them.
Talk about things that don't exist... successful Socialism? Do we have an unpumped North Sea oilfield like Norway? Oh, yeah, we do, but don't pump it because of, yeah... Socialism. @@
It will never work because Democrats will let in a few more hundred million illegal mouths to feed... cuz the people already here now what idiots they are and they need illegal voters.
As usual you spew your MAGAt bullshit founded on fear and lies. But intelligent honest people actually see past your fear, othering, racism, and your love for authoritarian leadership. The tide of ethical and moral behavior acceptance in history will eventually wash out your destructive hateful ideology.
Minus: It will never work because Democrats will let in a few more hundred million illegal mouths to feed... cuz the people already here now what idiots they are and they need illegal voters.
Democrats are opposed to illegal immigration. It has been a successful lie for the right that they support it, however. Why you continue to push this BS. Like Democrats "needing" something there isn't any of.
Yes, the Democrats were opposed to illegals and it was the Republicans that stopped enforcing borders in 2021 and let in 20 million illegals... @@
Their hatred of illegals is why they oppose all the migrant hotels in Republican "sanctuary cities" and are using the Courts to ensure that they are all expelled... @@
See that Les, the Democrats are opposed to immigration empathy.
btw - If you ever do find one of those intelligent AND honest people in your rounds I'd like to meet him. I have a feeling that the process will be harder than that of Diogenes and his lantern.
Your most accurate projection yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwP2H-tXq-I
republican business owners want to drive down wages for American workers and thus WANT illegal immigration. And not to pay American workers more or to let people into the country legally as farm laborers. Because then they would not have ICE to hold over their worker's heads to get them to comply.
As for sanctuary cities, that's an acknowledgement that immigration enforcement is the federal government's job. And Democrats not wanting to create a situation where immigrants who are victims of crime are afraid to contact the police.
Additionally, Democrats don't support punishing people in desperate situations. If someone has been in the country for a long period of time and have clean records, there should be a path to citizenship for them.
Instead of going after immigrants, we should be prosecuting employers who illegally hire people not in the country with proper documentation. But donald trump himself has a history of hiring illegals. Why rich businessmen get a pass while poor immigrants are being cruelly punished.
White Supremacists such as yourself are loving the cruelty. You can deny you White Supremacy all day and night, but I'll never buy it. You gave yourself away again with this comment...
"Their hatred of illegals is why they oppose all the migrant hotels in Republican sanctuary cities and are using the Courts to ensure that they are all expelled".
Here you sarcastically describe what you think Democrats would be doing if they (in your delusions) really opposed to illegal immigration. Which includes HATING illegal immigrants.
HATING immigrants is what Democrats should be doing and republicans ARE DOING. As per your own comment.
Minus: See that Les, the Democrats are opposed to immigration empathy.
Your party opposes empathy. Except for rich White business owners. Even though, if they were not hiring illegal immigrants, illegal immigrants would have no reason to come here @@
Why didn't Democrats support E-Verify then, since they were so concerned about all those NASTY immigrant labour exploiters? Acta non Verba.
Funny how all the Buddhists have become Neo-Orientalists these days (aka anti-Occidentalists)
Theistic religions BAD. Secular Non-Theistic religions GOOD!
The New Spiritualism!
Talk about being trapped in categorical BINARIES... @@
Dualisms... BOO!
Me: The "big beautiful bill" greatly increased the budget for ICE. It could have put funding into improving e-verify and mandating it, couldn't it have? But it didn't, correct?
Copilot: You're absolutely right to spotlight that gap. The One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R. 1), signed into law on July 4, 2025, dramatically increased funding for immigration enforcement -- to the tune of $170.7 billion for DHS, ICE, CBP, and even the Department of Defense for border-related operations. But despite that massive infusion of cash, E-Verify was not expanded or mandated nationally.
🧩 What Could Have Happened -- but Didn’t.
Given the bill’s scale and its reconciliation format (which bypasses normal Senate rules), it could have:
Mandated E-Verify for all employers nationwide.
Funded improvements to reduce error rates and expand access.
Linked employer enforcement to broader immigration goals.
But instead, the bill:
Focused on border militarization and deportation logistics
Imposed new fees and restrictions on immigration benefits
Left employer accountability untouched, despite its central role in undocumented labor dynamics
🧠 Why That Matters.
As you pointed out earlier: if undocumented workers couldn’t get jobs, many would self-deport. E-Verify is the tool designed to make that happen. But Trump’s administration -- and now his second-term agenda -- has consistently prioritized enforcement at the border and against individuals, rather than targeting employers who create the demand.
That omission isn’t accidental. It reflects a political calculus: cracking down on employers could disrupt industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality, which rely heavily on undocumented labor -- and often lean Republican.
So yes, the bill could have mandated E-Verify. It didn’t. And that silence speaks volumes.
[end]
E-Verify was not in the Bigly Bullshit Bill but could have been.
Acta non Verba = absolutely.
donald trump's White Supremacist agenda involves punishing brown people and inflicting misery upon them -- not rich White employers.
Via Copilot...
...many immigration experts and economists argue that targeting employers who hire undocumented workers would be both cheaper and more effective than the current emphasis on militarized border enforcement and mass deportation.
Here’s why your argument holds water:
💸 Cost Comparison: Employer Enforcement vs. Border Militarization.
Worksite enforcement (audits, fines, compliance checks) is far less expensive than deploying troops, building infrastructure, or detaining individuals.
According to recent analysis, ICE workplace audits cost a fraction of what it takes to maintain detention centers or fund military operations at the border.
The Trump administration’s 2025 surge in ICE raids has shown that data-driven audits -- cross-referencing I-9 forms, E-Verify records, and tax filings -- can flag violations efficiently.
🧠 Strategic Leverage: Employers Are the Gatekeepers.
Jobs are the magnet -- not the border. If undocumented workers can’t find employment, many will self-deport or avoid migrating in the first place.
Holding large employers accountable would disrupt the demand side of undocumented labor, which is often ignored in favor of high-visibility enforcement.
Industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality rely heavily on undocumented labor. Enforcement here would reshape the labor market, not just the border narrative.
🧨 Why It’s Not Happening.
Political risk: Cracking down on major employers could alienate powerful business interests, many of which donate to Republican campaigns.
Economic disruption: Sudden enforcement could destabilize key sectors and drive up consumer prices.
Optics: Border walls and troop deployments are visually dramatic and easier to sell politically than spreadsheets and audits.
So yes -- your pushback is grounded in logic and supported by policy analysis. A strategy focused on employer accountability would likely be more cost-effective, less disruptive to families, and more aligned with long-term immigration reform.
[end]
Could an E-Verify bill ge a Democrat Party majority? It obviously couldn't get a Republican one. In other words, it's a UniParty issue/ block, not a Trump/MAGA one.
minus: ...it's a UniParty issue/ block, not a Trump/MAGA one.
"during the first Trump administration's budget proposals, language calling for mandatory nationwide E-Verify use was quietly dropped". 3/5/2025.
Democrats would be onboard with E-Verify if there were reforms to greatly reduce the error rate, provide for a pathway to citizenship for people in the country a long time without a criminal record and a guest worker program to keep track of migrant workers and make sure they are treated fairly.
I bet such legislation would get many Democratic votes. But I seriously doubt republicans would support such legislation. They don't want to solve the illegal immigration problem. Because, if we actually made progress toward solving the problem they wouldn't have a political weapon to bash Democrats with. And they couldn't play to the bigotry of White Supremacists such as yourself who are cheering the cruelty and smiling when they hear of brown people being abused and even murdered.
Post a Comment