The Times of Israel: Michael Benz, who served in the State Department in Trump's first term, revealed in 2023 that he was the author of "Frame Game", an alt-right account that has for years posted rants about "the Jewish influence in the West" and promoted the idea that Jews have orchestrated a mass ethnic replacement.
"Let me be clear: I am extremely proud of this", Benz, who is Jewish, told NBC News after being questioned about the links between himself and the account. ...
In August 2017, around the time of the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where one counter-protester was killed, Benz, as Frame Game, wrote a long blog post in which he promoted Holocaust skepticism and anti-Israel sentiment. He also stated, “If I, a Jew, a member of the Tribe, Hebrew Schooled, can read Mein Kampf & think ‘holy s**t, Hitler actually had some decent points.’ Then NO ONE is safe from hating you once they find out who is behind the White genocide happening all over the world.” link
Mike Benz is a White Supremacist Turd. This explains why he supports donald trump, America's first White Supremacist president in a very long time.
Benz is certainly a confused, ignorant, deluded white supremacist as well as a purveyor of fascist authoritarianism. Fueling a new age hare against reason and truth.
EVERYTHING is NOT White Supremacy. That's BS from the Bad Matt Walsh meant to diminish/downplay/mock valid criticism.
What Mike Benz wrote and said is unambiguous and clear. White Supremacists praise Hitler and are proud to have done so. People who know the facts don't buy your BS.
Ask yourself, who is most responsible for these outrageous perversions of our Constitution and the looting of our treasury? It's the Rotten, Stinking Democrats! Of Course!
In short: every central pillar of American governance, from the Constitution to the courts, from elections to the border, has been corrupted by progressive communist democrats in their pursuit of power. In short the Corrupted by Progressive Communist Democrats are the new NAZIS!
He said he read Mein Kampf and that there was some sood stuff to know there. That isn't praise for Hitler, but simply the truth. He built the autobahn... the evil b*stard. Does that mean America should blow up its' Interstate Highway system because it reflects Nazism?
But it makes Mike Benz a white supremacist because he acknowledges that Hitler did some smart things. @@
Yep, EVERYTHING IS white supremacy in your deranged mind.
It started back in '47 when the OSS was Institutionalized as the CIA. I love George Kennan, but this lead to our current National Security State and the end of the US Constitution. If we want it back, we need to completely dismantle the US Intelligence Community, and all the related DOD links in the US military.
All this may seem an enormous platitude, but, if it is true, this is, of course, what ultimately refutes utilitarianism and what makes Hegel and Marx such monstrous traitors to our civilisation. When, in the famous passage, Ivan Karamazov rejects the worlds upon worlds of happiness which may be bought at the price of the torture to death of one innocent child, what can utilitarians, even the most civilised and humane, say to him? After all, it is in a sense unreasonable to throw away so much human bliss purchased at so small a price as one--only one--innocent victim, done to death however horribly--what after all is one soul against the happiness of so many? Nevertheless, when Ivan says he would rather return the ticket, no reader of Dostoevsky thinks this cold-hearted or mad or irresponsible; and although a long course of Bentham or Hegel might turn one into a supporter of the Grand Inquisitor, qualms remain.
Praising Hitler ISN'T about White Supremacy in YOUR deranged mind.
Via Copilot...
🛣️ Was the Autobahn Hitler’s Idea?
Not exactly. The idea and early construction of high-speed roads in Germany predated Hitler:
The first controlled-access highway in Germany, the AVUS in Berlin, opened in 1921.
Konrad Adenauer, then mayor of Cologne, oversaw the opening of the first public autobahn (Cologne–Bonn) in 1932 -- before Hitler came to power.
What Hitler did was appropriate the autobahn project for propaganda:
He staged photo ops and rebranded the network as “The Führer’s roads”.
The Nazi regime massively expanded the system, using it to promote national unity, reduce unemployment, and support military logistics.
🧠 What Did Mike Benz Mean by “Good Things Hitler Did”?
Mike Benz, under the pseudonym Frame Game, has a documented history of engaging in far-right discourse, including white identitarian rhetoric and conspiracy theories. His comment about “good things Hitler did” is ambiguous, but given the broader context of his online persona, it’s unlikely he was referring solely to infrastructure projects like the autobahn.
Even if he was, the rhetorical move here is familiar: citing a morally neutral or beneficial outcome (e.g., highways) to deflect from or dilute the gravity of a regime’s atrocities. It’s a classic tactic in historical revisionism -- highlighting utilitarian achievements to reframe or soften the legacy of authoritarian figures.
[end]
Hitler didn't build the Autobahn. America should not blow up it's interstate highway system because it doesn't reflect Nazism.
Volkswagen, commonly known as VW, has a complex history intertwined with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime. Hitler's vision for a "people's car" (Volkswagen in German) led to the establishment of the company in 1937. Ferdinand Porsche, at Hitler's request, designed the prototype for what would become the iconic Beetle. The company, initially named Gesellschaft zur Vorbereitung des Deutschen Volkswagens mbH, was founded by the Deutsche Arbeitsfront, the Nazi Party's labor organization. During World War II, the Volkswagen factory primarily produced vehicles for the German military, utilizing forced labor, including concentration camp inmates. Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Hitler's vision: . Hitler envisioned a car affordable for all Germans, a "people's car," and commissioned Ferdinand Porsche to design it.
Porsche's role: . Ferdinand Porsche, founder of the Porsche car company, was tasked with designing the car, which was initially called the KdF-Wagen.
When someone says “Hitler had good ideas like the Beetle,” they’re not just recounting history-- they’re choosing which parts of history to highlight. That choice often serves a purpose: to reframe, soften, or complicate the legacy of a regime known for its atrocities. It’s a classic move in historical revisionism: foreground utilitarian achievements to distract from or dilute moral accountability.
So when your commenter says “hippies love Hitler because they love Beetles,” they’re not just being provocative -- they’re trying to mock moral critique by collapsing appreciation of a product into ideological endorsement. It’s a rhetorical dodge, not a serious defense.
🔍 Copilot as a Source.
If they used Copilot to get that information, they likely got a historically accurate summary of the Beetle’s origins. But what they do with that information -- how they frame it -- is on them. Copilot doesn’t endorse rhetorical strategies; it provides facts. The user’s interpretation is their own.
The Beetle’s origin under Nazi Germany is historically accurate. But its global popularity -- especially among counterculture movements -- was largely due to postwar marketing, affordability, and aesthetic appeal. Hippies didn’t love Hitler; they loved a car that had long since been stripped of its fascist branding. To conflate the two is either intellectually lazy or deliberately provocative.
Joe Conservative's reply is more historically grounded but still steeped in apocalyptic framing:
The institutionalization of the CIA in 1947 did mark a shift toward a permanent national security apparatus, especially during the Cold War.
George Kennan, architect of containment, was deeply ambivalent about the militarization of foreign policy -- so invoking him adds a layer of intellectual legitimacy.
But the claim that this “ended the Constitution” is hyperbolic. What it gestures toward is a critique of the deep state or security state logic, where unelected agencies exert disproportionate influence over policy, surveillance, and war-making. That’s a valid concern -- but calling for the complete dismantling of the intelligence community and its military links is a radical prescription that ignores the geopolitical realities that shaped those institutions.
I don't do Trump "talking points". All YOU do is repeat Democratic Party talking points. See the difference. One person exercises independent thought, the other parrots the party line.
33 comments:
The Times of Israel: Michael Benz, who served in the State Department in Trump's first term, revealed in 2023 that he was the author of "Frame Game", an alt-right account that has for years posted rants about "the Jewish influence in the West" and promoted the idea that Jews have orchestrated a mass ethnic replacement.
"Let me be clear: I am extremely proud of this", Benz, who is Jewish, told NBC News after being questioned about the links between himself and the account.
...
In August 2017, around the time of the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where one counter-protester was killed, Benz, as Frame Game, wrote a long blog post in which he promoted Holocaust skepticism and anti-Israel sentiment. He also stated, “If I, a Jew, a member of the Tribe, Hebrew Schooled, can read Mein Kampf & think ‘holy s**t, Hitler actually had some decent points.’ Then NO ONE is safe from hating you once they find out who is behind the White genocide happening all over the world.” link
Mike Benz is a White Supremacist Turd. This explains why he supports donald trump, America's first White Supremacist president in a very long time.
Benz is certainly a confused, ignorant, deluded white supremacist as well as a purveyor of fascist authoritarianism. Fueling a new age hare against reason and truth.
hate not hare.
^^Has a hair up his *ss^^
Gee, Jews posting rants about Jews... is Benz a self-hating Jew? Or a white supremacist? Or an "Israelite" (one who wrestles with angels/ gods)?
Oh, wait, those are all "white supremacists" in the Progressive woke neo-racist world view.
...cuz everything is white supremacy!
EVERYTHING is NOT White Supremacy. That's BS from the Bad Matt Walsh meant to diminish/downplay/mock valid criticism.
What Mike Benz wrote and said is unambiguous and clear. White Supremacists praise Hitler and are proud to have done so. People who know the facts don't buy your BS.
Ask yourself, who is most responsible for these outrageous perversions of our Constitution and the looting of our treasury? It's the Rotten, Stinking Democrats! Of Course!
Progressive Democrats attacked our historic institutions (Supreme Court, Senate filibuster, Electoral College).
Weaponized federal agencies (CIA, FBI, DOJ) to protect allies and destroy opponents.
Targeted Trump relentlessly (investigations, impeachments, prosecutions, ballot removals, assassination attempts).
Shattered democratic norms (censorship, riots, imposed nominees).
Destroyed border security (sanctuary cities, unchecked illegal immigration).
In short: every central pillar of American governance, from the Constitution to the courts, from elections to the border, has been corrupted by progressive communist democrats in their pursuit of power. In short the Corrupted by Progressive Communist Democrats are the new NAZIS!
He said he read Mein Kampf and that there was some sood stuff to know there. That isn't praise for Hitler, but simply the truth. He built the autobahn... the evil b*stard. Does that mean America should blow up its' Interstate Highway system because it reflects Nazism?
But it makes Mike Benz a white supremacist because he acknowledges that Hitler did some smart things. @@
Yep, EVERYTHING IS white supremacy in your deranged mind.
It started back in '47 when the OSS was Institutionalized as the CIA. I love George Kennan, but this lead to our current National Security State and the end of the US Constitution. If we want it back, we need to completely dismantle the US Intelligence Community, and all the related DOD links in the US military.
It's time for Ivan to "Return the ticket" (Dostoevsky, "Brothers Karamozov")
Isaiah Berlin letter to George Kennan (2/13/51):
All this may seem an enormous platitude, but, if it is true, this is, of course, what ultimately refutes utilitarianism and what makes Hegel and Marx such monstrous traitors to our civilisation. When, in the famous passage, Ivan Karamazov rejects the worlds upon worlds of happiness which may be bought at the price of the torture to death of one innocent child, what can utilitarians, even the most civilised and humane, say to him? After all, it is in a sense unreasonable to throw away so much human bliss purchased at so small a price as one--only one--innocent victim, done to death however horribly--what after all is one soul against the happiness of so many? Nevertheless, when Ivan says he would rather return the ticket, no reader of Dostoevsky thinks this cold-hearted or mad or irresponsible; and although a long course of Bentham or Hegel might turn one into a supporter of the Grand Inquisitor, qualms remain.
Praising Hitler ISN'T about White Supremacy in YOUR deranged mind.
Via Copilot...
🛣️ Was the Autobahn Hitler’s Idea?
Not exactly. The idea and early construction of high-speed roads in Germany predated Hitler:
The first controlled-access highway in Germany, the AVUS in Berlin, opened in 1921.
Konrad Adenauer, then mayor of Cologne, oversaw the opening of the first public autobahn (Cologne–Bonn) in 1932 -- before Hitler came to power.
What Hitler did was appropriate the autobahn project for propaganda:
He staged photo ops and rebranded the network as “The Führer’s roads”.
The Nazi regime massively expanded the system, using it to promote national unity, reduce unemployment, and support military logistics.
🧠 What Did Mike Benz Mean by “Good Things Hitler Did”?
Mike Benz, under the pseudonym Frame Game, has a documented history of engaging in far-right discourse, including white identitarian rhetoric and conspiracy theories. His comment about “good things Hitler did” is ambiguous, but given the broader context of his online persona, it’s unlikely he was referring solely to infrastructure projects like the autobahn.
Even if he was, the rhetorical move here is familiar: citing a morally neutral or beneficial outcome (e.g., highways) to deflect from or dilute the gravity of a regime’s atrocities. It’s a classic tactic in historical revisionism -- highlighting utilitarian achievements to reframe or soften the legacy of authoritarian figures.
[end]
Hitler didn't build the Autobahn. America should not blow up it's interstate highway system because it doesn't reflect Nazism.
This is why Hippies love Hitler...
Another "bad idea" from Hitler (via CoPilot):
Volkswagen, commonly known as VW, has a complex history intertwined with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime. Hitler's vision for a "people's car" (Volkswagen in German) led to the establishment of the company in 1937. Ferdinand Porsche, at Hitler's request, designed the prototype for what would become the iconic Beetle. The company, initially named Gesellschaft zur Vorbereitung des Deutschen Volkswagens mbH, was founded by the Deutsche Arbeitsfront, the Nazi Party's labor organization. During World War II, the Volkswagen factory primarily produced vehicles for the German military, utilizing forced labor, including concentration camp inmates.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Hitler's vision:
.
Hitler envisioned a car affordable for all Germans, a "people's car," and commissioned Ferdinand Porsche to design it.
Porsche's role:
.
Ferdinand Porsche, founder of the Porsche car company, was tasked with designing the car, which was initially called the KdF-Wagen.
Via Copilot...
When someone says “Hitler had good ideas like the Beetle,” they’re not just recounting history-- they’re choosing which parts of history to highlight. That choice often serves a purpose: to reframe, soften, or complicate the legacy of a regime known for its atrocities. It’s a classic move in historical revisionism: foreground utilitarian achievements to distract from or dilute moral accountability.
So when your commenter says “hippies love Hitler because they love Beetles,” they’re not just being provocative -- they’re trying to mock moral critique by collapsing appreciation of a product into ideological endorsement. It’s a rhetorical dodge, not a serious defense.
🔍 Copilot as a Source.
If they used Copilot to get that information, they likely got a historically accurate summary of the Beetle’s origins. But what they do with that information -- how they frame it -- is on them. Copilot doesn’t endorse rhetorical strategies; it provides facts. The user’s interpretation is their own.
The Beetle’s origin under Nazi Germany is historically accurate. But its global popularity -- especially among counterculture movements -- was largely due to postwar marketing, affordability, and aesthetic appeal. Hippies didn’t love Hitler; they loved a car that had long since been stripped of its fascist branding. To conflate the two is either intellectually lazy or deliberately provocative.
[end]
Via Copilot...
🕵️ “The CIA Ended the Constitution”.
Joe Conservative's reply is more historically grounded but still steeped in apocalyptic framing:
The institutionalization of the CIA in 1947 did mark a shift toward a permanent national security apparatus, especially during the Cold War.
George Kennan, architect of containment, was deeply ambivalent about the militarization of foreign policy -- so invoking him adds a layer of intellectual legitimacy.
But the claim that this “ended the Constitution” is hyperbolic. What it gestures toward is a critique of the deep state or security state logic, where unelected agencies exert disproportionate influence over policy, surveillance, and war-making. That’s a valid concern -- but calling for the complete dismantling of the intelligence community and its military links is a radical prescription that ignores the geopolitical realities that shaped those institutions.
[end]
:)
:)
Nope, a lie effectively proffered to, and accepted by, extremely unknowledgeable and gullible people.
The bullshit runs so deep here from the gullible cons I had to go get my high fishing waders.
Did your Cloak of Gyges not cover up or shadow ban enough of it? Poor baby, his boots of narrative are getting muddy...
People who have seen too many truths hidden and covered up under the Cloak of Gyges of the Mainstream Press and Big Tech oligarchs.
The simple excuses must now be embellished with more easily refuted lies... *tsk-tsk*
Naw, its your Cloak of Conditioned Reified BS. Interests me not, never will.
When was the last time I posted a Trump "talking point" Xponder?
Oh look, the Nazi's did some good things, how fascist of you and Co-Pilot to notice!
Ahh, ya can't hide from your support of the malignant narcissist FOTUS. So the question is pointless and meaningless.
I don't do Trump "talking points". All YOU do is repeat Democratic Party talking points. See the difference. One person exercises independent thought, the other parrots the party line.
Here's a talking point for you, "Trump could cure cancer and the Democrats would blame him for unemployment in the medical profession".
Bullshit. But there is ABSOUTELY zero chance of that happening. Another meaningless statement.
My views are mine. I despise America politics, especially criminal trumpublican politics, and stay as far away as possible.
But truth is truth, lies are lies and tRump and his criminal party are prolific liars. RIGHT NOW that is all that concerns me for now.
The lies that hurt you are terrible! The ones that help you are noble, and therefore need not be mentioned. @@
As a "mediator" they Vanish!
Post a Comment