Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed’s scientific research is…odd. Arab mothers who engage in “interethnic mating” have worse birth outcomes than those who mate with Arab men? Also: Genetics, black race, and interracial mating? Why research this? WTF? https://t.co/9ZXCftqeuW
— J.D. Haltigan, PhD 🏒👨💻 (@JDHaltigan) October 15, 2026
The Documented Scientific Neo-Racism of Abdul El-Sayed
62 comments:
WTF? Again, I think you mean republicans, not Democrats. I don't know about the accuracy or context of this X comment, but El Sayed isn't the leader of the Democratic party.
But this post wasn't authored by him. It says "JD Haltigain" wrote it. You missed that?
btw, I do remember that the Radical Redneck made Anti-Miscegenation comments on Lisa's blog. You think he's a Democrat?
Continue-continue, cretin. ))))))
Your this bewilderment from facing science... is SAAAAAH natural, for a brainless idiots -- cretins. )))))))))))
Abdul El-Sayed belongs to the Democratic Party (specifically as a progressive wing candidate).
Political Party
• Party: Democratic Party
• Role/Status: The Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Michigan in the 2026 midterm elections.
Level of Political Influence
• Prominence: He is a major progressive figure and front-runner/nominee representing the left wing of the Democratic Party in Michigan.
• Impact within the Party: His surprise primary victory over moderate establishment-backed Congresswoman Haley Stevens exposed deep ideological divisions within the party.
• National Reach: Backed by prominent national progressives like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, he plays a pivotal role in testing the influence of the progressive platform against the party establishment and Republican opponent Mike Rogers.
• Historic Milestone: He won the primary to become a major party Senate nominee and stands to potentially become the first Muslim U.S. Senator in history if he wins the general election.
PS Means -- he is the face of the Future of DEMNs.
PPS Yawn.
//Backed by prominent national progressives like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
Oh... you should be proud and pissing hot from it... )))))
But... ah, I remember, SADners are not enough socialist fer ya.)))))
Barack Obama, the Mysterious Halfrican Communist Hypocrite Defends Ilihan Omar
Barack Obama, the Same Man Who Made America Wait Three Years for His Birth Certificate Now Says Ilihan Omar’s Papers Are off Limits! Now How about That?
Barack Obama, the Same Man Who Very Gets Involved Anything These Days. Because He Picks His Subjects, and He Picks His Moments. But on this past Sunday He Picked Ilhan Omar’s Citizenship to Get Involved with. The former President declared that the Trump administration is “Hounding” the Minnesota Congresswoman because she Criticizes the President. Federal agents searched Omar’s Washington home last week and Seized Her Phone as Part of a Criminal Probe into Her Immigration records. She hasn’t been charged. She denies everything. Trump says the case belongs to the Justice Department.
Obama has already ruled, He’s Not Waiting for the Justice Department.. He called the Government’s theory “Unsubstantiated” and predicted that the case would fall apart. Apparently a Former Constitutional Law Lecturer no longer needs to see the existing evidence before handing down his verdict. Obmar has his own account. And here it is! She arrived in America at 12. Her father became a citizen when she was 17, and children under 18 get citizenship automatically through a naturalized parent. If she was 17, she’s a citizen. If she was 18, she was supposed to file her own application.
That is a question about a date on paper. Documents answer it. Omar spent years in a Kenyan refugee camp after fleeing Somalia with no functioning Government, and I wouldn’t bet my house on the Birth records from that era. Checking a date is what Investigators get paid for doing!
Obama calls it “Persecution” . I call it “Checking the Records, from someone with a Badge who has the Authority to Check it!
Also take notice of the way he describes her, He describes Ilhan Omar as a “Law-Abiding Elected Official,” as if saying “So Just Close the File. Whether She Followed the Law Is the Exact Question Investigators are trying to answer. Announcing the result in advance is advocacy, and coming from a man who used to Teach Constitutional Law, it’s lazy advocacy. He would have flunked a student doing exactly that.
This is where the sermon gets hard to swallow. In June 2008, with questions swirling about his birthplace, the Obama campaign posted a scan of his short-form Certification of Live Birth. Hawaii’s health director later said she had personally seen the original on file. The long-form certificate stayed in a bound volume in Honolulu until April 2011, when Obama finally asked the state to waive its usual policy and the White House released certified copies.
That’s nearly three years of “Just Trust Us.” No Independent Document Examiner Ever Got Near It to Handle the Original. Hawaiian Officials Simply Just Vouched for it, and Bingo! That was supposed to settle things, and it was enough to make it “right”.
For the record, the evidence puts his Birth in Honolulu in 1961, and local papers printed the announcement that August. The Kenya stories were all just nonsense!
Continued~
My complaint is about attitude. Obama spent those three years treating every request for paperwork as an insult, and he never released his college transcripts at all. His own documents were His business. Omar’s documents, under an active federal Investigation, are apparently NOBODY ELSE’S BUSINESS. Nobody has ever forensically examined the original paperwork, if it even exists today.
Here’s the kicker. Back in 2019, Omar told Politico that Obama’s “hope and change” was a mirage and knocked his record on drones and caged migrant kids. She walked it back once the blowback hit and declared herself a fan. Now he’s riding to her rescue. Politics makes strange bedfellows, and stranger hypocrites.
So, here the Bottom Line. If Ilihan Omar was 17, the paperwork will show it, and she’ll keep her seat and her citizenship, plus a fresh grievance to fundraise on. If she was 18, Minnesota has a congresswoman with a serious legal problem. Either way, the record decides it, which is all anyone asked of Obama in 2008. He made the country wait three years and acted wounded the whole time. A man who dragged his feet that long has no business to lecture anyone about the Right to look at Documents.
– Midterm Election News Reports
Abdul El-Sayed: A Muslim Brotherhood Puppet and a Grave National Threat.
I had always thought that Les we the number One Idiot Name Calling Fool. But I’m now thinking that Dave “D” has him beat..
The nation needs more politicians with the intelligence and integrity of El Sayed.
And a sht load less like trump and his filthy fascist is allies
//Upon that realization I understood that Karl Marx's analysis, models, and predictions were spot on.
And what YOU know of that "analysis, models, and predictions"???
I tested you, cretin. And found you know perfect ZERO of it.
Yawn.
Sayed wrote the paper linked to. He's RACIST AS HELL! As Moslem FANATIC!.
Yes, the nation needs more neoracist Democrats... because the Klan need to make a comeback in the form of the Moslem Brotherhood.
Why "as"?
Yawn.
Pretty much "is".
But... it's O.K. to be fasist and fanatic... while you are progressive... comm... ehm, Socialist. ))))
//Upon that realization I understood that Karl Marx's analysis, models, and predictions were spot on.
And what YOU know of that "analysis, models, and predictions"???
I tested you, cretin. And found you know perfect ZERO of it.
Yawn.
ANEN TO THAT BRO.
Les You Deserve a POS like El-Sayid.
Sayed wrote the paper linked to. He's RACIST AS HELL! As Moslem FANATIC!
BS. He didn't write the paper. He co-authored it. And it's not racist at all.
Via Gemini...
🤖...a 2011 peer-reviewed public health study titled “Interethnic mating and risk for preterm birth among Arab-American mothers”, which was co-authored by Dr. Abdul El-Sayed during his time as an assistant professor of epidemiology at Columbia University.
• What the study actually is: It is a standard statistical analysis of birth registries evaluating healthcare disparities. In epidemiology, evaluating how different parental demographic combinations correlate with health outcomes (like premature birth or infant mortality) is a common method used to identify socioeconomic stress or gaps in medical care.
• The Findings: The study noted that Arab-American mothers who had children with non-Arab fathers experienced slightly higher rates of preterm births. Crucially, as reviewers and scientists point out, the paper explicitly attributes these variations to social factors, systemic disparities, and stressors -- not to any biological or moral objection to interracial marriage.🛑
"PS Means -- he is the face of the Future of DEMNs."
100 percent false. Because there are no "DEMNs". "Democrat" does not contain the letter "N".
If he is the face of the future Democrats (or Dems)... then I say that's fantastic news!👍👍👍👍🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
FYI, the word "so" also does not have a letter "A" in it. Let alone 5 of them. It also doesn't end with an "H". What a frigging dope )))))
No.
Minus: Yes, the nation needs more neoracist Democrats... because the Klan need to make a comeback in the form of the Moslem Brotherhood.
Sure. For that to happen there would need to be more than zero, which is the real number. I can't say with 100 percent certainty that it's literally zero, but the definitely could be rounded to being zero. Given that the percentage is almost certainly a fraction of a percent (if there are any).
But (most importantly), if there are any, the Democratic party doesn't want them. The Democratic party is about inclusion, and rejects any kind of racism.
Racist as Hell = Minus FJ.
//Upon that realization I understood that Karl Marx's analysis, models, and predictions were spot on.
And what YOU know of that "analysis, models, and predictions"???
I tested you, cretin. And found you know perfect ZERO of it.
Yawn.
//I can't say with 100 percent certainty that it's literally zero, but the definitely could be rounded to being zero.
Obvious cretin thinks that probabilities can be "rounded". )))))))
But... continue-continue, cretin
//If he is the face of the future Democrats (or Dems)... then I say that's fantastic news!👍👍👍👍🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
Until... you'll start crying -g that you *never* did said that. %^P
Arab is an ethnicity and ethno-linguistic identity, not a biological race, and it is not racist to use the term.
Key Facts About the Term
• Definition: An Arab is generally someone whose native language is Arabic and who shares Arab culture, history, or ancestry, originating historically from the Arabian Peninsula and expanding across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).
• Not a Single Race: "Arab" is not a genetic race. Because the Arabic language and culture spread across diverse regions, Arab populations include people of varied physical appearances, skin tones, and genetic backgrounds (including white, brown, and Black Arabs).
NOT BIOLOGICAL factor.
But that so-called "scientist" used it as the KEY... in his racial pseudo-science.
And IS IT surprise -- that findings of that "research" -g is exactly racists politics
--> That "arab ethnicity" women NEEDto mate only with arabs, because that "more healthy" <--
Was it not THE SAME line and logic as in Nazi Germany?
Yawn.
Well...
What would be with a White cisgender male scientist...
if he'd publish a paper saying -= that mating of White Females.... "more healthy" with White ones males???
@ Dervy... Do they? So where is the Democratic Paarty OUTRAGE over El-Sayed's demonstrated racist pseudo-science? *Crickets*
FDemocrats in their hypocrisy are slow walking theirselves and the country to cultural suicide. Suicidal empathy. Good thing that the Constitution isn't a suicide pact!
🤪Minus: @ Dervy... Do they? So where is the Democratic Paarty OUTRAGE over El-Sayed's demonstrated racist pseudo-science? *Crickets*
Of course there is crickets. Because there was no "demonstrated racist pseudo-science" (see my comment above).
But you ENDORSE that demonstrated racist pseudo-science of Charles Murray.
🤪Minus: Democrats in their hypocrisy are slow walking theirselves and the country to cultural suicide.
They aren't. White Supremacy isn't our culture, it's yours.
🤪Qtard: Obvious cretin thinks that probabilities can be "rounded". )))))))
Via Gemini...
1. You Weren't Even Talking About Probability.
You were discussing a proportion (the percentage of people in a group holding an opinion), not a probability (the likelihood of an event occurring). While they are mathematically related, they are distinct concepts. Proportions are routinely rounded in demographics, polling, and everyday conversation to make data easier to digest.
2. "Rounding to Zero" is a Standard Data Practice.
In statistics, data presentation, and economics, rounding small percentages down to zero is a completely standard practice known as rounding to the nearest whole unit.
• Major polling organizations -- like the Pew Research Center or Gallup -- frequently round values under 0.5% down to 0% in data tables to maintain clean formatting, often adding a footnote explaining that "0% indicates a value less than 0.5%".
• If 1 out of 1,000 people holds a specific opinion, that is 0.1%. Rounding that to the nearest whole percentage gives you 0%. Your logic was entirely sound.
3. Even Probabilities Can Be Rounded.
Even if you had been talking about probabilities, the claim that they "can't be rounded" is false. Probabilities are rounded constantly in real-world applications -- from weather forecasts (e.g., a "24% chance of rain" is rounded from a raw decimal model) to risk assessments. While mathematicians avoid rounding during calculations to keep them accurate, the final output is almost always rounded for clarity.🛑
Qtard: Until... you'll start crying -g that you *never* did said that. %^P
No, a-hole. I stand by what I write. You MADE UP this BS about me "denying things just said". I've never done that and never will.
It was not mentioned in DEMN propaganda...
yawn
...so it not exist.
Like there is no end of businesses that do not pay after work done.
DEMN-aligned too.
But DEMN propaganda said to care about "nasty-nasty-wrong" dRump not paying.
.
//Of course there is crickets. Because there was no "demonstrated racist pseudo-science" (see my comment above).
Because you as cretin -= dunno science to make own judgment.
And DEMN propaganda was silent about ir.
Yawn.
//Proportions are routinely rounded in demographics, polling, and everyday conversation to make data easier to digest.
Yep.
Exactly what DEMN pseudo-science do.
So then DEMN propaganda could use it as " Science Said It".
Yawn.
Like they did with "Climate Change".
By that DEMN "very true scientific estimates"... by 2020s we should be living in Climate Disaster... like in "Mad Max".... or even "Water World" Hollywoid agitation flicks.
But... who remember that TODAY???? )))))).
TODAY only one "disaster" DEMN propaganda tells to CARE about -- dRump ))))))))
.
//2. "Rounding to Zero" is a Standard Data Practice.
//In statistics, data presentation, and economics, rounding small percentages down to zero is a completely standard practice known as rounding to the nearest whole unit.
Rounding a probability to exactly zero is a big problem in math, statistics, and AI because zero means impossible.
In the real world, almost nothing is truly impossible—it is just highly unlikely. When you change a very small number (like 0.000001%) to 0%, you create what is called the "Zero Probability Problem."
Here is why that ruins your calculations, explained simply:
1. You Can Never "Unlearn" a Zero
In statistics, we update our beliefs when we see new evidence. But there is a rule in math: anything multiplied by zero is zero.
• If your AI model or formula decides the probability of an event is 0, and then that event actually happens right in front of it, the math gets stuck.
• Because it multiplied by 0, the model will still say the probability is 0. It becomes completely blind to reality and cannot learn from its mistakes.
2. The "Black Swan" Surprise
Imagine you have only ever seen white swans. If you round the probability of a black swan existing to 0, you are saying it is physically impossible.
When a black swan eventually flies by, your entire calculation breaks down. In the real world, this leads to financial crashes, tech failures, or bad medical diagnoses because the system didn't prepare for the "impossible."
3. It Ruins Computer Code
Computers use probabilities to make decisions (like predicting the next word you type or detecting spam).
• Many computer algorithms use something called logarithms to handle probabilities.
• In math, you cannot take the logarithm of zero (\(\log(0)\) is undefined/infinity).
• If a program hits a 0 probability, the code will often crash, throw an error, or break completely.
💡 How Experts Fix This
Instead of rounding to zero, scientists and programmers use a trick called smoothing (like Laplace Smoothing).
Instead of 0, they give incredibly rare events a tiny, microscopic number (like 0.000000001). This keeps the math working, allows the computer to keep learning, and leaves the door open for surprises!
//• If 1 out of 1,000 people holds a specific opinion, that is 0.1%. Rounding that to the nearest whole percentage gives you 0%. Your logic was entirely sound.
YEP!
Logic of cretins DEMNs.
Like in that movie where just one man -- specialist in vulanology -- told that nearest vulcano will erupt SOON.
Thousand of people in town near that vulcano just said "oh, shuddup! we rounding your opinion to zero" %^P
.
//No, a-hole. I stand by what I write. You MADE UP this BS about me "denying things just said". I've never done that and never will.
Your current alter-ego. %^P
Surely forgot. Or it dunno.
That you some other time said that... that you can forget, this thing. Or another. %^P
Just like "any other people who do not have perfect memory". %^P
Damn! You described your Reichwing ass perfectly, anymouse.
Yes I do deserve an intelligent, accomplished, honest, trustworthy individual like El Sayed.
You can keep the lying untrustworthy fascist republican.
Les Carpenter iF yYou Like El-Sayid so much He has a cock that u=you can Suck.
Why were "Statistics" invented, Derv? It's "just" a statistical analysis applied for the same reason Statistics were invented.
from Google AI:
The modern field of mathematics and statistics shares deep historical ties with the eugenics movement and scientific racism, developed largely to quantify and justify racial hierarchies.
Key Founders and Their Ideological Roots
• Francis Galton: Credited with creating much of early statistical methodology (including regression and correlation), Galton founded the eugenics movement to advocate for the "improvement" of human populations through selective breeding and the suppression of marginalized groups.
• Karl Pearson: Galton’s protégé and a major developer of modern biostatistics, Pearson used curve-fitting and contingency tables to argue for the intellectual inferiority of Jewish immigrants and non-white populations.
• Ronald A. Fisher: A giant in experimental design and analysis of variance (ANOVA), Fisher integrated Mendelian genetics with eugenics and framed statistical significance to defend hereditary class and racial distinctions.
• Carl Brigham: Creator of the early Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) in 1926, Brigham designed the exam using assumptions of white supremacy and wrote A Study of American Intelligence to claim that immigration and racial mixing caused national decline (though he later renounced these views in the 1930s).
Weaponization of Data
• Frederick L. Hoffman: In 1896, actuary Frederick L. Hoffman published Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro, a study commissioned by Prudential Life Insurance. He manipulated unstratified mortality and health data to claim that African Americans were biologically uninsurable, using the numbers to justify discriminatory insurance and social policies. This was heavily contested and exposed at the time by scholars and activists like W.E.B. Du Bois.
• The Myth of the "Norm": Early statisticians popularized the normal distribution (bell curve) not just as a math tool, but as a moral standard. Human traits were mapped to this curve, and anyone falling outside the designated "norm" (often defined by white, European standards) was labeled deviant or deficien
Sayed's father-in-law is the US wing of the brotherhood (ISNA/ CAIR).
His Sister confirmed their own direct family Brotherhood ties...
• In the 2012 posts, Abdelhadi mentioned having a conversation with their mother regarding her student activism within the Muslim Brotherhood while in college in Egypt during the early 1970s.
Abdul El-Sayed's Response
El-Sayed and his campaign have pushed back forcefully against the allegations, characterizing them as bad-faith, Islamophobic smear tactics designed to weaponize his faith:
• Regarding His Mother: El-Sayed clarified that his parents divorced when he was three years old. He was raised primarily by his father and stepmother in Michigan and stated he has never discussed events from 1970s Egypt with his biological mother. He dismissed the reliance on a decades-old tweet as "hearsay" rather than direct evidence of his own platform or record.
Taqiya is okay so long as its' "honest" taqiya... lol!
Qtard: --> That "arab ethnicity" women NEEDto mate only with arabs, because that "more healthy" <--
The paper referenced does not reach this conclusion. You wrote that and cited no source. Therefore that must be YOUR opinion.
Qtard: Your current alter-ego. %^P Surely forgot. Or it dunno. That you some other time said that... that you can forget, this thing. Or another. %^P
Just like "any other people who do not have perfect memory". %^P
I don't have "alter egos" in the sense of mental illness. I have only one ego. I said I don't have a photographic memory. Nobody does.
And I never said "I can forget this thing, or another". That's more made up BS from you. I probably have a better memory that you. I remember you watched the Mockingjay movie with Jennifer Lawrence, then forgot all about it. Even though you quoted it in a post. But then claimed I had a "false memory" when I later referenced your comment. And you came up with a totally lame excuse about watching dubbed copy when I quoted your comment about it. As if that somehow meant you didn't forget at all.
Minus: Why were "Statistics" invented, Derv? It's "just" a statistical analysis applied for the same reason Statistics were invented. from Google AI: The modern field of mathematics and statistics shares deep historical ties with the eugenics movement and scientific racism...
That would be the scientific racism (Charles Murray) that you believe in?
But this isn't any kind of proof that Democrats are (as a party) embracing "neo-racism". Which was your original claim. You wrote, "Yes, the nation needs more neoracist Democrats" (intended sarcastically).
I agree that the nation doesn't need any more "neo-racist" Democrats than the zero we currently have. Zero is a good amount. What the nation really doesn't need is more White Supremacist trump supporters (people like you).
Happy living to you %^P
In your "Reichwing" la-la-land. ))))
//Qtard: --> That "arab ethnicity" women NEEDto mate only with arabs, because that "more healthy" <--
//The paper referenced does not reach this conclusion
Yet.
Oh, please.
Like Hitler was eliquent about vrematories.
Like Pol Pot was eloquent about death fields.
They always sly.
Their talks always sweet.
Until...
//You wrote that and cited no source.
It cited in post.
Just after word "Abstract"
"Arab Ethnicity...
Yawn.
Just like "nordic ethnicity" of der fuhrer.
Yawn.
//Qtard: Your current alter-ego. %^P Surely forgot. Or it dunno. That you some other time said that... that you can forget, this thing. Or another. %^P
Just like "any other people who do not have perfect memory". %^P
//I don't have "alter egos" in the sense of mental illness. I have only one ego. I said I don't have a photographic memory. Nobody does.
Then... you are liar.
Stooopid liar.
With your cretinic lies that you "never" was doing this or that -- that fixed HERE IN THIS BLOG in your comments texts.
Yawn.
But... continue-continue, liar, struggling with tryes to "fix" all your previous lies... with steamy piles of fresh new ones. )))))
Because that is sure thing method to prove your truthfooolness... naaaaah.)))))))
//And I never said "I can forget this thing, or another". That's more made up BS from you. I probably have a better memory that you. I remember you watched the Mockingjay movie with Jennifer Lawrence, then forgot all about it.
Yeah.
Continue-continue showing your cretinity, cretin.
This one are one of mist hilarious)))))
//Even though you quoted it in a post. But then claimed I had a "false memory" when I later referenced your comment. And you came up with a totally lame excuse about watching dubbed
Because? There is NO movies that NOT dubbed in English???? ))))())
Because when people watch movies -- they AUTOMATICALLY became knowing names of actors??? And even directors of that movies??? (())))
Even if they saw just a little part of it?
Or even just some teasers on YouTube or whenever???
)))())))
Do it, cretin.
Do pile yet bigger pile of reeking of utter cretinity YOUR non-stop lying stupidity here. ((())
//As if that somehow meant you didn't forget at all.
Obviously.
It is NOT possible to forget...
something that you DIDN'T knew before "forgetting".
.
//Zero is a good amount. What the nation really doesn't need is more White Supremacist trump supporters (people like you).
And you gonna reduce em to zero?
Just like nazis tryed to do with a Jews? %^P
Your brilliant, anymouse. Like a brainless MAGA.
//You wrote that and cited no source.
Qtard: It cited in post. Just after word "Abstract" "Arab Ethnicity...
No liar. The paper does not say, "That arab ethnicity women NEEDto mate only with arabs, because that more healthy". You lied. And then (when I called you on it), lied again. Well... as always. You always double down on your lies when called on them.
Qtard: With your cretinic lies that you "never" was doing this or that -- that fixed HERE IN THIS BLOG in your comments texts.
Except that never happened. You quote me and try to say my words mean something else than what I meant. My "I never said that" has ALWAYS been in regards to your wrong interpretation of my words, and NOT denying the words were never even written. I stand by everything I write, a-hole.
Qtard: And you gonna reduce em to zero? Just like nazis tryed to do with a Jews? %^P
I've never killed anyone. Now you accuse me of planning mass murder? I'd be stopped. But I'll never try, due to me being opposed to murdering. Unlike you. You like it. You have defended murdering on this blog many times.
Qtard = EVERYTHING he disagrees with is "DEMN propaganda".
So, Dr. Mehmet Oz is lying about supporting donald trump. It's his "honest taqiya"?
I will concede that Qtard's admission that he was bewildered is 100 percent accurate.
When it defyes basic logic and immediate facts -- as propaganda usually do...
//Proof you do believe in collective guilt.
When you throwing stones into rabid dig -- is it because of "collective guikt"?
Yawn.
//Qtard: With your cretinic lies that you "never" was doing this or that -- that fixed HERE IN THIS BLOG in your comments texts.
//Except that never happened.
Because you remember perfectly EACH line you wrote? %^P
Even though you admitted "I said I don't have a photographic memory. Nobody does." JUST IN THIS THREAD.
JUST COUPLE POSTS ABOVE!!!))))
So, cretin?))))) When you was lying? %^P
There -- where you claimed that you can't remember it all?
Or HERE... where you trying cretinicly to claim that you remember it "never happened"? %^P
Most probably -- always.
You akways lying. Cretinicly. It means -- agaunst obvious FACTS.
But... continue-continue doung it. ))))))
//My "I never said that" has ALWAYS been in regards to your wrong interpretation of my words, and NOT denying the words were never even written. I stand by everything I write, a-hole.
So, cretin?
You "never even written" words -- "I don't have a photographic memory"??? ))))
Even though, here -- https://politicaltealeaves.blogspot.com/2026/10/are-democrats-heading-back-towards.html?showComment=1792444476236&m=1#c8818670460835459137
I can even give a link to that exactly comment you written that words...
yaaaaawn.
You are SAAAAAAH cretinic lair. It would be unbeluevable to be -- if you'd nit be a cretin.
But -- yiu are. ))))))
//Qtard: And you gonna reduce em to zero? Just like nazis tryed to do with a Jews? %^P
//I've never killed anyone
"Innocent Germans" in their mass alsi was not a killers.
Yawn.
They just supported their government. While turning blind eye to killing (and previously obstructing) Jews.
Yawn.
And their line of defence was exactly like yours here -- that they "never knew" about mass-murdering.
Even though WAR was going. And they was PERFECTLY AWARE of it. They was CHEERING for it.
Yawn.
//You have defended murdering on this blog many times.
And not you -- was unable to state that Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a mass-murder???
Yawn.
Or... you just again. Perfectly remember "never" deflecting, never seeking for excuses on this point??? ))())))
Could be...
Qtard: When you throwing stones into rabid dig -- is it because of "collective guikt"?
Nonsensical word salad. Yawn.
Minus: His Sister confirmed their own direct family Brotherhood ties... • In the 2012 posts, Abdelhadi mentioned having a conversation with their mother regarding her student activism within the Muslim Brotherhood while in college in Egypt during the early 1970s.
Half sister, concerning things his mother did before he was born. He personally has no ties.
Qtard: And their line of defence was exactly like yours here -- that they "never knew" about mass-murdering.
BULLSHIT. I know that the trump administration is committing war crimes by murder innocent fishermen of the coast of Venezuela and in Iran by bombing school children. You're the one who doesn't care about those school children.
I'm not denying knowing about these things. I think donald trump and others in his administration are war criminals and should be tried in the Hague. You lie when you say I'm claiming to not know about these crimes.
But wtf do I need a defense for? You definitely believe in collective guilt. But cowardly won't say what country you are from. Because you know I'd bring up crimes leaders in your country of residence are guilty of. And hold you accountable. But you're also a bigly hypocrite. Due to attacking others and calling them guilty and needing a defense. When the SAME is (almost certainly) true about you. Unless you are stateless and was born that way?
Qtard: YEP! Logic of cretins DEMNs. Like in that movie where just one man -- specialist in vulanology -- told that nearest vulcano will erupt SOON. Thousand of people in town near that vulcano just said "oh, shuddup! we rounding your opinion to zero" %^P
What a dumbass. Clearly you're thinking of the movie with Pierce Brosnan called "Dante's Peak". But this is "mist funny". Because I wasn't even talking about the opinions of experts. And you obviously watch a lot of movies and seem to be thinking they are real life and talking about them like they really happened. But later don't remember referencing these movies at all.
Like with the Mockingjay movie, which you hilariously claim to not remember because I referred to it using the name of the actress who is in it. When what really happened is that you called it "Mokingjay" and I brought up your reference to the mockingjay movie. And only later said it was the movie with Jennifer Lawrence. And now you hinge your entire defense on not knowing the name of the actress. When I referred to the movie (initially) using the title, which you did know (but butchered). And I even remembered that you called it "Mokingjay" instead of "Mockingjay". Still you didn't remember. And now claim I only referred to a movie with Jennifer Lawrence -- and you never knew her name. Because that's the best lie you could come up with and are now stubbornly sticking with that lie.
When you could have said, "yeah, I forgot". But you can't. Due to making a big deal about me truthfully admitting I don't have a photographic memory. And you stupidly making a big deal about that. And lying about that being an admission that I'm forgetting all the time
When it was you who provably forgot. While you have no examples of me forgetting anything. You only falsely claim I'm forgetting all the time. And writing idiotic comments about a "present me" forgetting about what the "past me" wrote. And giving fake examples.
Qtard: When it defyes basic logic and immediate facts -- as propaganda usually do.
Yeah. That's when you don't want the facts I cite to be true. Then you just say they are "Demn propaganda". Without providing the facts cited are wrong or that the source is someone (or some people) who vote Democratic or identify with (or are affiliated with) the Democratic party at all.
Also despite the FACT that the word "Democrat" and "Democratic" has no "N" in it. That's a fact that is easily proven, btw. But you, as a cretin, dunno how to spell many, many words. And keep spelling them wrong even when corrected many times.
Post a Comment