The Liberals, Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s Big Tent isn’t welcoming. It’s a “Velvet Rope” around a dumpster fire of dysfunction. The Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s’ "Big Tent" Is a Trap for Suckers to be Welcomed to Their Freak Show of Failures! The Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Liberals, Communist’s love preaching about their inclusive “Big Tent,” but peel back the Big Tent’s slogans, and you find a Toxic Circus packed with the worst elements of society. This isn’t a party of ideas. It’s a recruitment drive for Perverts, Deviants, Disaffected Losers, the Chronically Unaccomplished, and Basement Dwellers who prefer online fantasy to real life. They dangle acceptance, then demand your cash, your vote, and your total obedience! But when you step inside their “Big Tent” and the first faces you meet AREN’T everyday Americans. These Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s celebrate every form of Deviance while shaming normal behavior. Traditional families? Mocked. Biological reality? NO! Reality Denied. The party platform bends over backward to normalize the abnormal and punish anyone who notices. This isn’t compassion. It’s a deliberate assault on sanity designed to erode the foundations that built successful lives. The backbone of this operation are people who live online rather than in the real world. These digital dependents rage from anonymous accounts, untouched by consequences or daylight. No businesses to run. No families to raise. No stakes in actual outcomes. Progressive, Liberals, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s love them because they provide the clicks, the outrage, and the unwavering loyalty that comes from having nothing better to do. Reality is scary when your entire existence is corroded feeds and echo chambers of Failed Leadership. Theses people like Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Cory Booker are prominent Democratic lawmakers from New York and New Jersey, representing different ideological wings and leadership roles within the party. Their specific current roles and political profiles prey on weakness, reward failure, and punish success. Real Americans see through the Con. So Don’t Step Inside. At the end of the day, the So Called Big Tent is transactional. They want your money through endless donations and taxes. They want your vote to keep the machine humming. Most importantly, they demand your soul – blind obedience to the cause with zero tolerance for dissent. Question the agenda? And you’re excommunicated faster than you can say “cancel culture.” Liberals, Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s , there no doubt that you'll make some gains in this years Midterms, but the 2028 General Election will be here before you know it, and you folks and your lunatic messaging is as fragmented as a busted windshield.
You're against Trump because he won't fully release the Epstein files, or he's too cozy with Billionaires, or he doesn't care about affordability, he's weaponized the justice system to persecute his political rivals, or he hates the environment, or he's run up the national debt, and he says Ugly Things about Women and Minorities, and on and on and on.... If you folks and your Socialist candidates don't start rallying around one central theme, and pound that message home, you'll have that old Elephant flying over the Whitehouse for a long time to come. Bill Clinton's message was "it's the economy stupid!" - and despite his womanizing ways he won!
No one running in the New York elections ran as a “Communist.” They ran as Progressives in Sheep’s Clothing that were actually “Communist.” ,, Like an abusive anti-immigrant regime, social safety net cuts, and tax hikes for the wealthy.
The attack was boringly familiar to anyone who’s paid attention to U.S. politics for the last 60-plus years. Conveniently for the right, whoever is in charge of the Democratic Party , and most likely Hakeem Jeffries, or, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who are now the influential voice within the party that IS full of Communism or Socialism. Socialism is always how Communism starts. Socialism, or Communism has never worked, never. And it never will, no matter what Hakeem Jeffries says!
The babbling of a dysfunctional authoritarian minded MAGA sheeple. As he kisses the ass of a malignant narcissist, racist white supremacist, sexual predator and rapist, a "man" who incited an insurrection against our government, a "man" who in reality care only about himself and his wealth and power, and a despicable indecent pile of human rot.
Why do progressive Democrats always elect clowns like Schumer, Booker, and Jeffries? This is a perfect example of a curious subset of Quora questions where even a cursory bit of knowledge shows the premises the question is based on are utterly false.
In this instance, it’s the simple fact that neither Chuck Schumer, Cory Booker nor Hakeem Jeffries were elected by progressives. Schumer and Booker were elected by the voters in New York and New Jersey, and Jeffries was elected by the voters in New York’s 12th Congressional District in Brooklyn.
That’s how elections work: Voters from the various wings of a political party unite behind their party’s candidate, and some voters cross party lines to vote for candidates they believe will most effectively represent their state or district.
On top of that, Chuck Schumer is not a progressive, and not in any definition of that term. In fact, he has been widely criticized by progressives as being emblematic of the old-school Democratic establishment. They view Schumer’s pragmatism as capitulation to the Republicans, and view Schumer’s close ties to Wall Street and the corporations as a direct affront to progressive views. In fact, both Booker and Jeffries have specifically pointed his finger at Schumer as an obstacle to the renewal of the Democratic Party. But in the end call him what you will, he is still and Idiot.
In his last re-election in 2022, Schumer captured 56% of the vote, a sharp decline from his re-election bids in 2016, 2010, and 2004. And that was against a weak Republican challenger with zero political experience.
Why do progressives elect clowns like Schumer, Booker, and Jeffries? In this instance, it’s the simple fact that neither Chuck Schumer, Cory Booker nor Hakeem Jeffries were elected by progressives. Schumer and Booker were elected by the voters in New York and New Jersey, and Jeffries was elected by the voters in New York’s 12th Congressional District in Brooklyn.
That’s how elections work: Voters from the various wings of a political party unite behind their party’s candidate, and some voters cross party lines to vote for candidates they believe will most effectively represent their state or district.
On top of that, Chuck Schumer is not a progressive, and not in any definition of that term. In fact, he has been widely criticized by progressives as being emblematic of the old-school Democratic establishment. They view Schumer’s pragmatism as capitulation to the Republicans, and view Schumer’s close ties to Wall Street and the corporations as a direct affront to progressive views. In fact, both Booker and Jeffries have specifically pointed his finger at Schumer as an obstacle to the renewal of the Democratic Party. In my Educated, and Political eyes Chucky Schumer is just a Plain old simple Idiot, nothing more and Certainly Nothing Less. .
Just a Bit Of Information for some people who can't think about reality, but just follow the Mob of other Idiots instead. Below is the IHRA (international holocaust remeberance alliance) working definition of antisemitism for people who don’t know what this is. This is most widely accepted definition of antisemitism. I would urge all to read carefully. There Is no reason for anyone to dispute anything outlined below: “To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations: Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits. Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: -Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. -Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. -Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. -Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). -Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. -Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. -Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. -Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. -Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. -Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. -Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries). -Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews. -Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries
Israel is an ethno-nationalist State trying to ethically cleanse (not without good reason) their Jewish State. Calling out the practice isn't anti-semitism. It's "universalism"... a hallmark of western civ.
So stop trying to pretend that we're racist in calling out an ethno-State that actively practices ethnic cleansing and has Jim Crow laws for Palestinians. Instead, try reforming/ re-branding the meaning of Jewish ethnic nationalism instead of trying to exploit charges of western racism for Jewish-American advantage and privilege. You've given new life (since WWII) to America's original sins of racism. We want to get over/ move beyond it and unlike you, become race NON-essentialists. Where race is incidental, NOT PRIMARY (as in Israel).
We know it's difficult because the Arab World and the Palestinians in particular, are VERY religion-essentialist and will never allow you to establish yourselves as a Jewish State despite there being over 20 "Islamic" States in the region. But accusing US of racism won't help your cause. Honesty MIGHT. Rock - Hard Place. We get it.
Only the 21% of Arabs living within the borders of the original State of Israel can vote. Palestinians in the West bank and Gaza cannot, making Israel a defacto Apartheid State. So either justify it, or annex the territories and grant them citizenship rights. Don't just pretend that everyone is "racist" for noticing.
So why did you title your post "Honest Ads: Palantir" if you're skeptical that Palantir will make your fascist dreams come true and people who have opinions you don't like will start getting mass arrested?
We need more of those HOLIER THEN THOU Democrats to hear that Heart Felt speach that Jessica Gorman on Capitol Hill: In a recent House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing, Jessica Gorman testified about the fatal shooting of her 18-year-old daughter, Sheridan. She passionately questioned why politicians prioritize sanctuary city policies over the safety of American citizens. And hopefully that might help.
If that would not be your dream come true, why did you vote affirmatively for Palantir to pursue that goal? Because, with Thiel's proxy as the VP, you did.
Via g00gle: Extensive research, including adoption and transracial studies, shows that when Black and mixed-race children are raised in environments with increased socioeconomic resources and reduced environmental stressors, their average IQ scores and academic achievement levels increase significantly.🛑
btw, what's bad about being normal? Most people are. While being abnormal doesn't necessarily mean worse, in your case it definitely does. A strong belief in White Supremacy not being the norm. I'm sure you have a different explanation for Black IQs. One in line with your White Supremacist beliefs.
Minus: So stop trying to pretend that we're racist in calling out an ethno-State that actively practices ethnic cleansing and has Jim Crow laws for Palestinians.
You're "calling out" this by saying, "good job, well done"? Because I definitely remember you approved of Palestinians being slaughtered.
...to what 90 IQ instead of 85? There is an environmental component. But 90 is a reason to put someone on the Superior Court. That's your DEI argument.
Why isn't the Left screaming about Islamic discrimination and apartheid (Where's the Defund Saudi Movement)?
Yes, Saudi Arabia officially discriminates against other religions and non-Wahhabi Islamic sects. The legal and institutional frameworks strictly enforce Sunni Islam, resulting in severe restrictions and unequal treatment for non-Muslims and religious minorities.
The Saudi government enforces specific policies and institutional inequalities against other religions and beliefs:
Public Practice Ban: The government prohibits the public practice of any religion other than Islam and forbids all non-Muslim houses of worship. Non-Muslims are legally restricted to practicing their faith in private, and even this is not consistently protected in practice.
Citizenship Requirements: Non-Muslims are systematically excluded from becoming citizens; applicants for naturalization must list their religious affiliation and receive an endorsement from a local Imam.
Unequal Legal Compensation: The Saudi legal system, based on strict Sharia law, applies different values of civil damages based on religion. In cases of injury or wrongful death, Christians and Jews are generally entitled to only 50% of what a Muslim male receives, while Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs receive approximately 6%.Intolerance in State Textbooks: State-sanctioned religious authorities oversee an educational system and public statements that promote intolerance toward other religious beliefs and moderate or minority Islamic branches.
Treatment of Islamic Minorities: Official discrimination also extends to minority Islamic sects. The government systematically discriminates against Shi'a Muslims in public education, the justice system, and employment.
Because of these policies, the U.S. State Department consistently designates Saudi Arabia as a Countries of Particular Concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act. You can read more about these conditions in the USCIRF Annual Report on Saudi Arabia..
Either criticize all race essentialism, or stop pretending that some race essentialism is okay and others are not. The point is to move in the direction of race or religion non-essentialism, not double down on it like the "woke" do.
We can't force racial/ religious non-essentialism on the world. We can, however, show the world the benefits of a race-religion non-essentialist society.
wtf? There was no "weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy". There is now. You voted for a weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy and got it. You didn't vote against a weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy, you voted affirmatively for a weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy. How (in your delusions) was government bureaucracy weaponized "one-sided" previously? I know you have delusions about the IRS being weaponized against conservative groups (when that never happened). Can you give any other examples?
Nobody was placed on a "superior court" under DEI who has an IQ of 90. That's your White Supremacist delusion. Ketanji Brown Jackson graduated magna cum laude for her undergraduate degree and cum laude from Harvard Law School. That's not something that a person with a 90 IQ could accomplish.
Minus: Saudi Arabia doesn't officially discriminate against those of other religions? Been to Mecca, much?
They absolutely do. It's your strawman that I ever said they didn't.
Minus: Why isn't the Left screaming about Islamic discrimination and apartheid (Where's the Defund Saudi Movement)?
Why isn't the Right screaming about this? Under trump the right is more closely allied with Saudi Arabia than under Biden. But they both thought/think Saudi Arabia/US relations being good is important... due to oil. Also, unlike Israel, the United States does not give massive amounts of financial aid to Saudi Arabia. Why would there be a movement to end aid that isn't given?
Minus: The Israeli's are only assholes because they're surrounded by assholes. They're not "more evil" as the Left pretends.
The Left doesn't pretend this. You made it up that the Left thinks this. The Left criticizes the Israeli government, not the Israeli people. Lots of Israelis disagree with the war crimes their government is committing in Gaza.
Minus: Good for the goose. Gravy for the gander.
Your excuse for violence and murder.
Minus: Either criticize all race essentialism, or stop pretending that some race essentialism is okay and others are not.
That's what you pretend.
Minus: The point is to move in the direction of race or religion non-essentialism, not double down on it like the "woke" do.
Woke opposes these things. YOU support race and religion essentialism and have doubled down on both.
It seems as if California can’t finish building a train, so naturally the State’s next idea is a Bus that goes 140 miles an hour.
California is now studying a High-speed Bus Network connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco, part of a broader concept that would also link Sacramento, San Diego, Fresno, and Bakersfield. The pitch: buses running in dedicated freeway lanes, hitting speeds of 100 to 140 mph, cutting the LA-to-San Francisco run to about three hours. Nothing has been funded. Nothing has been approved. It’s a feasibility study, which in Sacramento usually means a very expensive way of saying “maybe someday.”
Sen. Dave Cortese, who chairs the Senate Transportation Committee, called high-speed Buses “a good idea” and “certainly an option to Gavin’s “Rail.” That’s one Senator’s opinion. The ENGINEERING SAYS OTHERWISE..
Lets face it, the facts are that the high-speed Rail project has already shown what happens when California tries this, it just won’t work!! Period!. Voters approved it in 2008. Two decades later, the state still hasn’t laid a mile of track that carries a paying passenger. Costs ballooned. Timelines vanished. The same “won’t-build-can’t-build” dysfunction that strangled the train will strangle the bus.
California’s insists the bus system would complement rail, not replace it, reaching areas the train won’t and connecting to future rail stations. That’s a nice theory. It also assumes the rail gets finished, which after fifteen years remains an open question. And those in the know say “high-speed buses traveling up to 140 mph could provide a faster, lower-cost alternative to driving and complement California’s high-speed rail system by connecting cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Fresno and Bakersfield.” California’s trucks that are limited to 55 mph with auto traffic doing 70 mph on a four lane freeway and now they want to mix in Buses doing 80-140 mph. LOL, this is a Recipe for Disaster Add that to the fact that they can't even get the High Speed Rail up and running . High Speed busses would be perfect, if they only knew what they were doing!, But knowing Los Angeles the only thing “High” there will be the Bus Drivers.
Why try to use logic and truth with the reification of ignorance (jc and MAGA sheeple) Dervish? It is impossible for them actually acknowledge reality as it goes against their Fuhrer trump and his flock of sycophants.
How about 50% of federal civil servants being democrats?They're 27% of the population, and 50% of government workers How'd they get those jobs, do you suppose?
Sounds "weaponized" to me... Yes, research indicates that registered Democrats make up just over half of the federal career civil service.
A major study linking personnel records to voter registration data found that Democratic civil servants account for approximately 50% of the federal workforce. The remaining portion is made up of registered Independents (which have grown) and registered Republicans, who dropped from 32% to roughly 26% over the observed period.
This partisan breakdown varies significantly by agency:
Heavily Democratic: Departments such as the EPA, the State Department, and the Department of Education can have up to 70% of their career employees registered as Democrats.
Balanced/Conservative: Departments like Agriculture and Transportation are more ideologically balanced, with nearly equal numbers of registered Democrats and Republicans.
That sounds like false information to me. Why you gave no source. Like with the fake FrameGame resume you posted.
🤖Via Copilot...
Joe Conservative’s comment is not factually supported by the study he is referencing.
His claims...
“Democrats are 50% of civil service” → Not supported by any source.
“Republicans dropped from 32% to 26%” → Not supported.
“EPA/State/Education are 70% Democrat” → Not supported.
“This proves Democrats weaponized civil service jobs” → Contradicted by the study.
Actual research...
Shows mixed partisan composition.
Shows no partisan hiring cycles.
Shows no weaponization.
Shows morale effects for both parties when misaligned with the president.
👉The only major study linking federal personnel records to voter registration is by Guo Xu (Berkeley Haas), Jörg Spenkuch, and Edoardo Teso, published as an NBER working paper. It matched ~1.26 million federal employees to voter registration records.
What the study doesn't say...
It does not claim Democrats make up “just over half” of the civil service.
It does not report Republicans dropping from 32% to 26%.
It does not give agency‑level partisan percentages (EPA 70% Democrat, etc.).
It does not claim Democrats have “weaponized” civil service jobs.
None of those numbers appear in the study or in any other academic source returned by your search.🛑
Minus: Google own AI is the source. Is your AI saying that my AI is unrelieable? lol!
No. It says your information is wrong. And any chatbot will admit it can be wrong. When I use Copilot, I first see a disclaimer that says Copilot can give incorrect information. And, in your case, it was. I gave a source. But no, I didn't dig into and read this paper. I only went by the Copilot summary. But you're the one who made the claim regarding what the paper says. So it's your responsibility to prove it says what you (or the google AI) says it does, not mine.
I do, however, think that your (google AI) claims being accurate are very improbable. Copilot confirmed that the study exists and says the stats you give aren't in the paper. And your (google AI) alleged conclusions aren't in the paper either. Copilot says the google AI hallucinated your "facts" about this paper.
You'd just say it was rigged. Her record of accomplishment proves her IQ is higher than 95 -- and still you deny that. Why WOULDN'T you deny the results of an IQ test are accurate? In other words, you can get bent.
donald trump should take an IQ test. I say it would prove his IQ is on the low side. My proof is the fact that he clearly doesn't understand how many things work. He doesn't understand how tariffs work. He doesn't understand the right way to fix the United States immigration problem, which is that the problem begins with the employers, not the illegal immigrant employees. He didn't understand that Iran would not cave in response to being bombed (apparently he was warned that Iran would close the strait of Hormuz but ignored the warnings). This is because he is a fundamentally dumb person.
You have different standards for who should be president over who can serve on the Supreme Court? Is a very stupid POTUS a positive in your mind?
Minus: AA and DEI are race essentialism in its' purests forms.
They aren't. They are measures intended to counter the effects of your White Supremacist race essentialism.
Minus: You hate both, Derv? Who knew?
Nobody, because I don't. I approve of both, in theory. In practice the application in all cases is probably imperfect. But I don't believe that imperfect application is a reason to not try to counter your (White) race essentialism. The consequences of doing nothing would be a lot worse.
56 comments:
Isn't this all good news to you?
The Liberals, Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s Big Tent isn’t welcoming. It’s a “Velvet Rope” around a dumpster fire of dysfunction.
The Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s’ "Big Tent" Is a Trap for Suckers to be Welcomed to Their Freak Show of Failures!
The Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Liberals, Communist’s love preaching about their inclusive “Big Tent,” but peel back the Big Tent’s slogans, and you find a Toxic Circus packed with the worst elements of society. This isn’t a party of ideas. It’s a recruitment drive for Perverts, Deviants, Disaffected Losers, the Chronically Unaccomplished, and Basement Dwellers who prefer online fantasy to real life. They dangle acceptance, then demand your cash, your vote, and your total obedience!
But when you step inside their “Big Tent” and the first faces you meet AREN’T everyday Americans. These Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s celebrate every form of Deviance while shaming normal behavior. Traditional families? Mocked. Biological reality? NO! Reality Denied. The party platform bends over backward to normalize the abnormal and punish anyone who notices. This isn’t compassion. It’s a deliberate assault on sanity designed to erode the foundations that built successful lives.
The backbone of this operation are people who live online rather than in the real world. These digital dependents rage from anonymous accounts, untouched by consequences or daylight. No businesses to run. No families to raise. No stakes in actual outcomes. Progressive, Liberals, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s love them because they provide the clicks, the outrage, and the unwavering loyalty that comes from having nothing better to do. Reality is scary when your entire existence is corroded feeds and echo chambers of Failed Leadership.
Theses people like Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Cory Booker are prominent Democratic lawmakers from New York and New Jersey, representing different ideological wings and leadership roles within the party. Their specific current roles and political profiles prey on weakness, reward failure, and punish success. Real Americans see through the Con. So Don’t Step Inside. At the end of the day, the So Called Big Tent is transactional. They want your money through endless donations and taxes. They want your vote to keep the machine humming. Most importantly, they demand your soul – blind obedience to the cause with zero tolerance for dissent. Question the agenda? And you’re excommunicated faster than you can say “cancel culture.”
Liberals, Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communist’s , there no doubt that you'll make some gains in this years Midterms, but the 2028 General Election will be here before you know it, and you folks and your lunatic messaging is as fragmented as a busted windshield.
You're against Trump because he won't fully release the Epstein files, or he's too cozy with Billionaires, or he doesn't care about affordability, he's weaponized the justice system to persecute his political rivals, or he hates the environment, or he's run up the national debt, and he says Ugly Things about Women and Minorities, and on and on and on....
If you folks and your Socialist candidates don't start rallying around one central theme, and pound that message home, you'll have that old Elephant flying over the Whitehouse for a long time to come. Bill Clinton's message was "it's the economy stupid!" - and despite his womanizing ways he won!
No one running in the New York elections ran as a “Communist.” They ran as Progressives in Sheep’s Clothing that were actually “Communist.” ,, Like an abusive anti-immigrant regime, social safety net cuts, and tax hikes for the wealthy.
The attack was boringly familiar to anyone who’s paid attention to U.S. politics for the last 60-plus years. Conveniently for the right, whoever is in charge of the Democratic Party , and most likely Hakeem Jeffries, or, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who are now the influential voice within the party that IS full of Communism or Socialism. Socialism is always how Communism starts.
Socialism, or Communism has never worked, never. And it never will, no matter what Hakeem Jeffries says!
The babbling of a dysfunctional authoritarian minded MAGA sheeple. As he kisses the ass of a malignant narcissist, racist white supremacist, sexual predator and rapist, a "man" who incited an insurrection against our government, a "man" who in reality care only about himself and his wealth and power, and a despicable indecent pile of human rot.
Why do progressive Democrats always elect clowns like Schumer, Booker, and Jeffries?
This is a perfect example of a curious subset of Quora questions where even a cursory bit of knowledge shows the premises the question is based on are utterly false.
In this instance, it’s the simple fact that neither Chuck Schumer, Cory Booker nor Hakeem Jeffries were elected by progressives. Schumer and Booker were elected by the voters in New York and New Jersey, and Jeffries was elected by the voters in New York’s 12th Congressional District in Brooklyn.
That’s how elections work: Voters from the various wings of a political party unite behind their party’s candidate, and some voters cross party lines to vote for candidates they believe will most effectively represent their state or district.
On top of that, Chuck Schumer is not a progressive, and not in any definition of that term. In fact, he has been widely criticized by progressives as being emblematic of the old-school Democratic establishment. They view Schumer’s pragmatism as capitulation to the Republicans, and view Schumer’s close ties to Wall Street and the corporations as a direct affront to progressive views. In fact, both Booker and Jeffries have specifically pointed his finger at Schumer as an obstacle to the renewal of the Democratic Party. But in the end call him what you will, he is still and Idiot.
In his last re-election in 2022, Schumer captured 56% of the vote, a sharp decline from his re-election bids in 2016, 2010, and 2004. And that was against a weak Republican challenger with zero political experience.
Why do progressives elect clowns like Schumer, Booker, and Jeffries?
In this instance, it’s the simple fact that neither Chuck Schumer, Cory Booker nor Hakeem Jeffries were elected by progressives. Schumer and Booker were elected by the voters in New York and New Jersey, and Jeffries was elected by the voters in New York’s 12th Congressional District in Brooklyn.
That’s how elections work: Voters from the various wings of a political party unite behind their party’s candidate, and some voters cross party lines to vote for candidates they believe will most effectively represent their state or district.
On top of that, Chuck Schumer is not a progressive, and not in any definition of that term. In fact, he has been widely criticized by progressives as being emblematic of the old-school Democratic establishment. They view Schumer’s pragmatism as capitulation to the Republicans, and view Schumer’s close ties to Wall Street and the corporations as a direct affront to progressive views. In fact, both Booker and Jeffries have specifically pointed his finger at Schumer as an obstacle to the renewal of the Democratic Party. In my Educated, and Political eyes Chucky Schumer is just a Plain old simple Idiot, nothing more and Certainly Nothing Less. .
Try taking the sugar-free Kool-Aid, Les... the sugar peak is showing through
Only if they come for you and lock you up, Derv. Otherwise, call me a skeptic.
Just a Bit Of Information for some people who can't think about reality, but just follow the Mob of other Idiots instead.
Below is the IHRA (international holocaust remeberance alliance) working definition of antisemitism for people who don’t know what this is. This is most widely accepted definition of antisemitism. I would urge all to read carefully. There Is no reason for anyone to dispute anything outlined below:
“To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
-Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
-Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
-Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
-Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
-Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
-Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
-Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
-Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
-Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
-Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
-Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
-Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
-Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries
Now sugar peak. Merely doing what MAGA and its leader is completely incapable of doing. Telling the truth.
Like low average black IQs? Telling "your" truth is more like it.
Israel is an ethno-nationalist State trying to ethically cleanse (not without good reason) their Jewish State. Calling out the practice isn't anti-semitism. It's "universalism"... a hallmark of western civ.
So stop trying to pretend that we're racist in calling out an ethno-State that actively practices ethnic cleansing and has Jim Crow laws for Palestinians. Instead, try reforming/ re-branding the meaning of Jewish ethnic nationalism instead of trying to exploit charges of western racism for Jewish-American advantage and privilege. You've given new life (since WWII) to America's original sins of racism. We want to get over/ move beyond it and unlike you, become race NON-essentialists. Where race is incidental, NOT PRIMARY (as in Israel).
We know it's difficult because the Arab World and the Palestinians in particular, are VERY religion-essentialist and will never allow you to establish yourselves as a Jewish State despite there being over 20 "Islamic" States in the region. But accusing US of racism won't help your cause. Honesty MIGHT. Rock - Hard Place. We get it.
In other words, Stuff your partisan IHRA definition and let us get back to Universalism and Race NON-essentialism.
Only the 21% of Arabs living within the borders of the original State of Israel can vote. Palestinians in the West bank and Gaza cannot, making Israel a defacto Apartheid State. So either justify it, or annex the territories and grant them citizenship rights. Don't just pretend that everyone is "racist" for noticing.
...and that YOU (with the double standard and custom definitions) are NOT!
Whatever. You're the fucking genius. Of bullshit.
So why did you title your post "Honest Ads: Palantir" if you're skeptical that Palantir will make your fascist dreams come true and people who have opinions you don't like will start getting mass arrested?
I'm skeptical that it won't get weaponized and used against all Americans, Derv, you today, me tomorrow.
And you of normiedom.
We need more of those HOLIER THEN THOU Democrats to hear that Heart Felt speach that Jessica Gorman on Capitol Hill: In a recent House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing, Jessica Gorman testified about the fatal shooting of her 18-year-old daughter, Sheridan. She passionately questioned why politicians prioritize sanctuary city policies over the safety of American citizens. And hopefully that might help.
If that would not be your dream come true, why did you vote affirmatively for Palantir to pursue that goal? Because, with Thiel's proxy as the VP, you did.
You Can’t fix Stupid,
That’s why Dave and Les keep talking
Minus: Like low average black IQs?
Via g00gle: Extensive research, including adoption and transracial studies, shows that when Black and mixed-race children are raised in environments with increased socioeconomic resources and reduced environmental stressors, their average IQ scores and academic achievement levels increase significantly.🛑
btw, what's bad about being normal? Most people are. While being abnormal doesn't necessarily mean worse, in your case it definitely does. A strong belief in White Supremacy not being the norm. I'm sure you have a different explanation for Black IQs. One in line with your White Supremacist beliefs.
Minus: So stop trying to pretend that we're racist in calling out an ethno-State that actively practices ethnic cleansing and has Jim Crow laws for Palestinians.
You're "calling out" this by saying, "good job, well done"? Because I definitely remember you approved of Palestinians being slaughtered.
Against an already weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy? Why wouldn't I
...to what 90 IQ instead of 85? There is an environmental component. But 90 is a reason to put someone on the Superior Court. That's your DEI argument.
Maybe they'll "grow" into a 95 IQ...
I've always said that I was a good tit-4-tat man. Palestinians slaughter too.
Saudi Arabia doesn't officially discriminate against those of other religions? Been to Mecca, much?
Why isn't the Left screaming about Islamic discrimination and apartheid (Where's the Defund Saudi Movement)?
Yes, Saudi Arabia officially discriminates against other religions and non-Wahhabi Islamic sects. The legal and institutional frameworks strictly enforce Sunni Islam, resulting in severe restrictions and unequal treatment for non-Muslims and religious minorities.
The Saudi government enforces specific policies and institutional inequalities against other religions and beliefs:
Public Practice Ban: The government prohibits the public practice of any religion other than Islam and forbids all non-Muslim houses of worship. Non-Muslims are legally restricted to practicing their faith in private, and even this is not consistently protected in practice.
Citizenship Requirements: Non-Muslims are systematically excluded from becoming citizens; applicants for naturalization must list their religious affiliation and receive an endorsement from a local Imam.
Unequal Legal Compensation: The Saudi legal system, based on strict Sharia law, applies different values of civil damages based on religion. In cases of injury or wrongful death, Christians and Jews are generally entitled to only 50% of what a Muslim male receives, while Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs receive approximately 6%.Intolerance in State Textbooks: State-sanctioned religious authorities oversee an educational system and public statements that promote intolerance toward other religious beliefs and moderate or minority Islamic branches.
Treatment of Islamic Minorities: Official discrimination also extends to minority Islamic sects. The government systematically discriminates against Shi'a Muslims in public education, the justice system, and employment.
Because of these policies, the U.S. State Department consistently designates Saudi Arabia as a Countries of Particular Concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act. You can read more about these conditions in the USCIRF Annual Report on Saudi Arabia..
The Israeli's are only assholes because they're surrounded by assholes. They're not "more evil" as the Left pretends.
Good for the goose. Gravy for the gander.
Either criticize all race essentialism, or stop pretending that some race essentialism is okay and others are not. The point is to move in the direction of race or religion non-essentialism, not double down on it like the "woke" do.
We can't force racial/ religious non-essentialism on the world. We can, however, show the world the benefits of a race-religion non-essentialist society.
Become the ideal. American exceptionalism.
The American monocultural-multicultural leitmotif
Lester Your Posts Are Getting More And More idIotic Every Day
yes they are so why don’t you go back to Shaws Progressive Rag and stay there?
wtf? There was no "weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy". There is now. You voted for a weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy and got it. You didn't vote against a weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy, you voted affirmatively for a weaponized one-sided government bureaucracy. How (in your delusions) was government bureaucracy weaponized "one-sided" previously? I know you have delusions about the IRS being weaponized against conservative groups (when that never happened). Can you give any other examples?
Nobody was placed on a "superior court" under DEI who has an IQ of 90. That's your White Supremacist delusion. Ketanji Brown Jackson graduated magna cum laude for her undergraduate degree and cum laude from Harvard Law School. That's not something that a person with a 90 IQ could accomplish.
Minus: Saudi Arabia doesn't officially discriminate against those of other religions? Been to Mecca, much?
They absolutely do. It's your strawman that I ever said they didn't.
Minus: Why isn't the Left screaming about Islamic discrimination and apartheid (Where's the Defund Saudi Movement)?
Why isn't the Right screaming about this? Under trump the right is more closely allied with Saudi Arabia than under Biden. But they both thought/think Saudi Arabia/US relations being good is important... due to oil. Also, unlike Israel, the United States does not give massive amounts of financial aid to Saudi Arabia. Why would there be a movement to end aid that isn't given?
Minus: The Israeli's are only assholes because they're surrounded by assholes. They're not "more evil" as the Left pretends.
The Left doesn't pretend this. You made it up that the Left thinks this. The Left criticizes the Israeli government, not the Israeli people. Lots of Israelis disagree with the war crimes their government is committing in Gaza.
Minus: Good for the goose. Gravy for the gander.
Your excuse for violence and murder.
Minus: Either criticize all race essentialism, or stop pretending that some race essentialism is okay and others are not.
That's what you pretend.
Minus: The point is to move in the direction of race or religion non-essentialism, not double down on it like the "woke" do.
Woke opposes these things. YOU support race and religion essentialism and have doubled down on both.
It seems as if California can’t finish building a train, so naturally the State’s next idea is a Bus that goes 140 miles an hour.
California is now studying a High-speed Bus Network connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco, part of a broader concept that would also link Sacramento, San Diego, Fresno, and Bakersfield. The pitch: buses running in dedicated freeway lanes, hitting speeds of 100 to 140 mph, cutting the LA-to-San Francisco run to about three hours. Nothing has been funded. Nothing has been approved. It’s a feasibility study, which in Sacramento usually means a very expensive way of saying “maybe someday.”
Sen. Dave Cortese, who chairs the Senate Transportation Committee, called high-speed Buses “a good idea” and “certainly an option to Gavin’s “Rail.” That’s one Senator’s opinion. The ENGINEERING SAYS OTHERWISE..
Lets face it, the facts are that the high-speed Rail project has already shown what happens when California tries this, it just won’t work!! Period!. Voters approved it in 2008. Two decades later, the state still hasn’t laid a mile of track that carries a paying passenger. Costs ballooned. Timelines vanished. The same “won’t-build-can’t-build” dysfunction that strangled the train will strangle the bus.
California’s insists the bus system would complement rail, not replace it, reaching areas the train won’t and connecting to future rail stations. That’s a nice theory. It also assumes the rail gets finished, which after fifteen years remains an open question.
And those in the know say “high-speed buses traveling up to 140 mph could provide a faster, lower-cost alternative to driving and complement California’s high-speed rail system by connecting cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Fresno and Bakersfield.”
California’s trucks that are limited to 55 mph with auto traffic doing 70 mph on a four lane freeway and now they want to mix in Buses doing 80-140 mph. LOL, this is a Recipe for Disaster
Add that to the fact that they can't even get the High Speed Rail up and running .
High Speed busses would be perfect, if they only knew what they were doing!,
But knowing Los Angeles the only thing “High” there will be the Bus Drivers.
Why try to use logic and truth with the reification of ignorance (jc and MAGA sheeple) Dervish? It is impossible for them actually acknowledge reality as it goes against their Fuhrer trump and his flock of sycophants.
How about 50% of federal civil servants being democrats?They're 27% of the population, and 50% of government workers How'd they get those jobs, do you suppose?
Sounds "weaponized" to me...
Yes, research indicates that registered Democrats make up just over half of the federal career civil service.
A major study linking personnel records to voter registration data found that Democratic civil servants account for approximately 50% of the federal workforce. The remaining portion is made up of registered Independents (which have grown) and registered Republicans, who dropped from 32% to roughly 26% over the observed period.
This partisan breakdown varies significantly by agency:
Heavily Democratic: Departments such as the EPA, the State Department, and the Department of Education can have up to 70% of their career employees registered as Democrats.
Balanced/Conservative: Departments like Agriculture and Transportation are more ideologically balanced, with nearly equal numbers of registered Democrats and Republicans.
lol! Give her the test and we'll see.
The Leftl loves race essentialism. It simplifies their arguments. Everything is race, and everyone (but them) is racist!
The Left hates race essentialism and rightturd lies about White Supremacy really being race non-essentialism.
AA and DEI are race essentialism in its' purests forms. You hate both, Derv? Who knew?
That sounds like false information to me. Why you gave no source. Like with the fake FrameGame resume you posted.
🤖Via Copilot...
Joe Conservative’s comment is not factually supported by the study he is referencing.
His claims...
“Democrats are 50% of civil service” → Not supported by any source.
“Republicans dropped from 32% to 26%” → Not supported.
“EPA/State/Education are 70% Democrat” → Not supported.
“This proves Democrats weaponized civil service jobs” → Contradicted by the study.
Actual research...
Shows mixed partisan composition.
Shows no partisan hiring cycles.
Shows no weaponization.
Shows morale effects for both parties when misaligned with the president.
👉The only major study linking federal personnel records to voter registration is by Guo Xu (Berkeley Haas), Jörg Spenkuch, and Edoardo Teso, published as an NBER working paper. It matched ~1.26 million federal employees to voter registration records.
What the study doesn't say...
It does not claim Democrats make up “just over half” of the civil service.
It does not report Republicans dropping from 32% to 26%.
It does not give agency‑level partisan percentages (EPA 70% Democrat, etc.).
It does not claim Democrats have “weaponized” civil service jobs.
None of those numbers appear in the study or in any other academic source returned by your search.🛑
Google own AI is the source. Is your AI saying that my AI is unrelieable? lol!
More grunts from the jc grunt show.
Minus: Google own AI is the source. Is your AI saying that my AI is unrelieable? lol!
No. It says your information is wrong. And any chatbot will admit it can be wrong. When I use Copilot, I first see a disclaimer that says Copilot can give incorrect information. And, in your case, it was. I gave a source. But no, I didn't dig into and read this paper. I only went by the Copilot summary. But you're the one who made the claim regarding what the paper says. So it's your responsibility to prove it says what you (or the google AI) says it does, not mine.
I do, however, think that your (google AI) claims being accurate are very improbable. Copilot confirmed that the study exists and says the stats you give aren't in the paper. And your (google AI) alleged conclusions aren't in the paper either. Copilot says the google AI hallucinated your "facts" about this paper.
Minus: lol! Give her the test and we'll see.
You'd just say it was rigged. Her record of accomplishment proves her IQ is higher than 95 -- and still you deny that. Why WOULDN'T you deny the results of an IQ test are accurate? In other words, you can get bent.
donald trump should take an IQ test. I say it would prove his IQ is on the low side. My proof is the fact that he clearly doesn't understand how many things work. He doesn't understand how tariffs work. He doesn't understand the right way to fix the United States immigration problem, which is that the problem begins with the employers, not the illegal immigrant employees. He didn't understand that Iran would not cave in response to being bombed (apparently he was warned that Iran would close the strait of Hormuz but ignored the warnings). This is because he is a fundamentally dumb person.
You have different standards for who should be president over who can serve on the Supreme Court? Is a very stupid POTUS a positive in your mind?
Minus: AA and DEI are race essentialism in its' purests forms.
They aren't. They are measures intended to counter the effects of your White Supremacist race essentialism.
Minus: You hate both, Derv? Who knew?
Nobody, because I don't. I approve of both, in theory. In practice the application in all cases is probably imperfect. But I don't believe that imperfect application is a reason to not try to counter your (White) race essentialism. The consequences of doing nothing would be a lot worse.
Post a Comment