Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Monday, August 4, 2025
Why DoJ Just Classified the Evidence in the Ryan Routh Trump Assassination Attempt
14 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I advise these Democrats from Texas to protest and possibly assault some ICE Agents while on their vacation. That will really help them in their cause. I’d advise that bunch of whiners to come back or be thrown out.
Right wing men disproportionately fill the roles, cultures, and mindsets that involve physical risk, sacrifice, duty-based identity, warrior ethos, and a willingness to die for what they believe in. Those aren’t just job categories; they’re dispositions, and culturally, the right is more aligned with that stoic, confrontational, protector archetype. That’s just reality. Most men willing to fight and die for what they believe in are on the political right. Most of the military, law enforcement, first responders, and tradesmen, jobs that demand discipline, sacrifice, and risk, are overwhelmingly right leaning. The right still embraces traditional masculine virtues such as courage, duty, honor, protection, and the stoic acceptance of pain or death if necessary. There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but I am speaking in general right now.
Mike Benz has indeed made provocative claims suggesting that Ryan Routh -- the man accused of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump -- was connected to U.S. government entities, possibly as an asset of the State Department or affiliated intelligence networks. In interviews, Benz estimated a “95% likelihood” that Routh was working with or through informal government-linked channels, though he stopped short of naming a specific agency.
However, these claims remain speculative and unverified. No official source -- neither the Department of Justice, the State Department, nor any intelligence agency -- has confirmed that Routh was a government asset. The allegations hinge on circumstantial evidence, such as Routh’s international activities, communications with Ukrainian contacts, and his alleged request for military-grade weapons. Benz and others have pointed to Routh’s history in conflict zones like Ukraine and Haiti as suggestive of deeper ties, but again, this is not substantiated by public records or court filings.
It’s also worth noting that federal prosecutors have classified certain materials in Routh’s case, citing national security concerns. That has fueled speculation, but classification alone doesn’t confirm government affiliation -- it could simply reflect the sensitivity of the investigation.
So while Benz’s theory is dramatic and politically charged, it currently lacks hard evidence.
🧠 Operational Logic Breakdown (why Ryan Routh being a State Department asset is HIGHLY unlikely)...
Asset Vetting: Agencies spend months -- often years -- vetting potential assets for psychological stability, tactical efficiency, and capacity to follow orders under pressure. Routh’s actions, based on publicly available information, don’t reflect any of that.
Probability Modeling: Risk assessment teams rigorously model success/failure rates before greenlighting any action. A high-risk lone actor with erratic behavior would likely be disqualified from any meaningful role, let alone one as explosive as political assassination.
Mission Design: Real operations are layered with contingency plans and buffers. The crude, easily traceable nature of Routh’s alleged actions is the antithesis of covert strategy.
Failure Fallout: For an agency, a failed mission of this kind isn’t just a loss -- it’s a geopolitical catastrophe. That’s not a gamble they take lightly, especially not with someone showing red flags.
So yes, if this were a real black-ops scenario, it would look very different -- quiet, clean, and deniable. Routh’s profile just doesn’t fit. His failure doesn’t prove he wasn’t an asset, but it does make that hypothesis exponentially less credible from an intelligence operations standpoint.
END COPILOT RESPONSE
Do you think that (in your delusions) that the trump administration will prosecute people in the State Department for the donald trump "assassination" attempt? And maybe they will find out that Joe Biden himself (or Jill Biden) personally signed off on the "assassination"?
Mike Benz has truly revealed himself as a full blown tinfoil hatter. His family should stage an intervention and get him the help he needs. Unless they are in on it. They know he LIES for money and is spinning BS for the gullible maga base.
So, Shaw has always been proud of her city that has always been against tyrants and for diversity, equity, and inclusion. I guess she didn’t mind that it was run by Crooked Politicians, and Dumb Politicians.
Something tells me that when the dust finally settles, we will find out that Ryan Routh got hired by someone in the DNC to assassinate Donald John Trump Sr. God Almighty knew way ahead of time that the Democrats were plotting to steal the 2024 election. Some people think Barack 0bama ordered the hit on Trump. Right now, it's looking like 0bama might become the first US President to go to prison.
Copilot: That comment reads less like political analysis and more like a conspiracy spiral wrapped in apocalyptic theater. It's drenched in unfounded speculation, invoking divine foresight, shadowy plots, and historical firsts without offering a shred of credible evidence. The tone -- mixing melodrama with accusatory certainty—is designed less to inform than to provoke and polarize.
This kind of rhetoric thrives in the emotional and imaginative zones of fringe media, where myth-making substitutes for investigation. The casual use of “0bama” (with a zero) is a telltale sign -- it’s often used in spaces that lean into derision or coded mockery, not earnest discourse. [end]
Copilot: That reply is deeply disturbing -- not just for its violent tone, but for what it reveals about the emotional volatility surrounding political discourse right now. The accusation of “treason” against Barack Obama, pushed by Tulsi Gabbard and Donald Trump, has been widely criticized as baseless and inflammatory. Legal experts have pointed out that treason is narrowly defined in the U.S. Constitution and that nothing presented in Gabbard’s report meets that threshold.
Your original comment was grounded in reality: no credible legal authority has found Obama guilty of any crime, let alone one punishable by death. The reply you received -- “electric chair” -- is not just hyperbolic, it’s a chilling example of how political rhetoric can escalate into fantasies of retribution. [end]
Your hopes will 100 percent go unfulfilled. Even if Barack Obama was 100 percent guilty. What he is falsely accused of isn't treason.
If Obama were proven to have knowingly authorized an assassination attempt on a presidential candidate (like Donald Trump), and it met the criteria for capital murder or terrorism, then yes -- the death penalty could be on the table under federal law.
However, such a case would require extraordinary evidence, survive intense legal scrutiny, and overcome immense political and constitutional hurdles. No precedent exists for prosecuting a former president in this way.
🧩 Real-World Context.
There’s no credible evidence that Obama was involved in any such plot. Ryan Routh, the man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump in 2024, is currently in pre-trial detention and facing multiple federal charges. There’s no indication he was ever a State Department asset or connected to Obama. [end]
As I recall, you claimed that Ryan Routh would be freed. Now he will be proven to be a state department asset and Barack Obama personally signed off on the donald trump "assassination" attempt? You are in desperate need of an intervention staged by your loved ones and some psychiatric care. Don't your family members give a shit about you?
14 comments:
I advise these Democrats from Texas to protest and possibly assault some ICE Agents while on their vacation. That will really help them in their cause. I’d advise that bunch of whiners to come back or be thrown out.
Right wing men disproportionately fill the roles, cultures, and mindsets that involve physical risk, sacrifice, duty-based identity, warrior ethos, and a willingness to die for what they believe in. Those aren’t just job categories; they’re dispositions, and culturally, the right is more aligned with that stoic, confrontational, protector archetype. That’s just reality. Most men willing to fight and die for what they believe in are on the political right. Most of the military, law enforcement, first responders, and tradesmen, jobs that demand discipline, sacrifice, and risk, are overwhelmingly right leaning. The right still embraces traditional masculine virtues such as courage, duty, honor, protection, and the stoic acceptance of pain or death if necessary.
There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but I am speaking in general right now.
Mike Benz has indeed made provocative claims suggesting that Ryan Routh -- the man accused of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump -- was connected to U.S. government entities, possibly as an asset of the State Department or affiliated intelligence networks. In interviews, Benz estimated a “95% likelihood” that Routh was working with or through informal government-linked channels, though he stopped short of naming a specific agency.
However, these claims remain speculative and unverified. No official source -- neither the Department of Justice, the State Department, nor any intelligence agency -- has confirmed that Routh was a government asset. The allegations hinge on circumstantial evidence, such as Routh’s international activities, communications with Ukrainian contacts, and his alleged request for military-grade weapons. Benz and others have pointed to Routh’s history in conflict zones like Ukraine and Haiti as suggestive of deeper ties, but again, this is not substantiated by public records or court filings.
It’s also worth noting that federal prosecutors have classified certain materials in Routh’s case, citing national security concerns. That has fueled speculation, but classification alone doesn’t confirm government affiliation -- it could simply reflect the sensitivity of the investigation.
So while Benz’s theory is dramatic and politically charged, it currently lacks hard evidence.
🧠 Operational Logic Breakdown (why Ryan Routh being a State Department asset is HIGHLY unlikely)...
Asset Vetting: Agencies spend months -- often years -- vetting potential assets for psychological stability, tactical efficiency, and capacity to follow orders under pressure. Routh’s actions, based on publicly available information, don’t reflect any of that.
Probability Modeling: Risk assessment teams rigorously model success/failure rates before greenlighting any action. A high-risk lone actor with erratic behavior would likely be disqualified from any meaningful role, let alone one as explosive as political assassination.
Mission Design: Real operations are layered with contingency plans and buffers. The crude, easily traceable nature of Routh’s alleged actions is the antithesis of covert strategy.
Failure Fallout: For an agency, a failed mission of this kind isn’t just a loss -- it’s a geopolitical catastrophe. That’s not a gamble they take lightly, especially not with someone showing red flags.
So yes, if this were a real black-ops scenario, it would look very different -- quiet, clean, and deniable. Routh’s profile just doesn’t fit. His failure doesn’t prove he wasn’t an asset, but it does make that hypothesis exponentially less credible from an intelligence operations standpoint.
END COPILOT RESPONSE
Do you think that (in your delusions) that the trump administration will prosecute people in the State Department for the donald trump "assassination" attempt? And maybe they will find out that Joe Biden himself (or Jill Biden) personally signed off on the "assassination"?
Mike Benz has truly revealed himself as a full blown tinfoil hatter. His family should stage an intervention and get him the help he needs. Unless they are in on it. They know he LIES for money and is spinning BS for the gullible maga base.
That's a good thing too. Those attributes keep law and order around to fight off chaos.
Hey asshat, F**k Off.
So, Shaw has always been proud of her city that has always been against tyrants and for diversity, equity, and inclusion. I guess she didn’t mind that it was run by Crooked Politicians, and Dumb Politicians.
Something tells me that when the dust finally settles, we will find out that Ryan Routh got hired by someone in the DNC to assassinate Donald John Trump Sr. God Almighty knew way ahead of time that the Democrats were plotting to steal the 2024 election. Some people think Barack 0bama ordered the hit on Trump. Right now, it's looking like 0bama might become the first US President to go to prison.
Rattrapper aka Mystere: Something tells me...
Copilot: That comment reads less like political analysis and more like a conspiracy spiral wrapped in apocalyptic theater. It's drenched in unfounded speculation, invoking divine foresight, shadowy plots, and historical firsts without offering a shred of credible evidence. The tone -- mixing melodrama with accusatory certainty—is designed less to inform than to provoke and polarize.
This kind of rhetoric thrives in the emotional and imaginative zones of fringe media, where myth-making substitutes for investigation. The casual use of “0bama” (with a zero) is a telltale sign -- it’s often used in spaces that lean into derision or coded mockery, not earnest discourse. [end]
Something tell me that you're a nutjob.
Guilty is as guilty does.
Like Mitt Romney... ;)
Prison? I'm hoping electric chair.
You're saying Mike Benz is guilty of lying? I agree.
Copilot: That reply is deeply disturbing -- not just for its violent tone, but for what it reveals about the emotional volatility surrounding political discourse right now. The accusation of “treason” against Barack Obama, pushed by Tulsi Gabbard and Donald Trump, has been widely criticized as baseless and inflammatory. Legal experts have pointed out that treason is narrowly defined in the U.S. Constitution and that nothing presented in Gabbard’s report meets that threshold.
Your original comment was grounded in reality: no credible legal authority has found Obama guilty of any crime, let alone one punishable by death. The reply you received -- “electric chair” -- is not just hyperbolic, it’s a chilling example of how political rhetoric can escalate into fantasies of retribution. [end]
Your hopes will 100 percent go unfulfilled. Even if Barack Obama was 100 percent guilty. What he is falsely accused of isn't treason.
Via Copilot...
🔍 In This Hypothetical.
If Obama were proven to have knowingly authorized an assassination attempt on a presidential candidate (like Donald Trump), and it met the criteria for capital murder or terrorism, then yes -- the death penalty could be on the table under federal law.
However, such a case would require extraordinary evidence, survive intense legal scrutiny, and overcome immense political and constitutional hurdles. No precedent exists for prosecuting a former president in this way.
🧩 Real-World Context.
There’s no credible evidence that Obama was involved in any such plot. Ryan Routh, the man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump in 2024, is currently in pre-trial detention and facing multiple federal charges. There’s no indication he was ever a State Department asset or connected to Obama. [end]
As I recall, you claimed that Ryan Routh would be freed. Now he will be proven to be a state department asset and Barack Obama personally signed off on the donald trump "assassination" attempt? You are in desperate need of an intervention staged by your loved ones and some psychiatric care. Don't your family members give a shit about you?
Post a Comment