Simp is an internet slang term describing someone who shows excessive sympathy and attention toward another person, typically someone who does not reciprocate the same feelings, in pursuit of affection or a sexual relationship.[1][2] This behavior, known as simping,[3] is carried out toward a variety of targets, including celebrities,[1] politicians,[4][5] e-girls, and e-boys.[6] The term had sporadic usage until gaining traction on social media in 2019
Mark Penn, "Turning the Gaza Hospital Blast into Propaganda Instead of News"
Blood is on the hands of some in American journalism for their complete failure to sort out fact from terrorist propaganda in the Gaza hospital explosion. It was a shocking collapse of journalistic process, and its impacts were devastating. A correction is not enough. It demands an apology.
Anyone reading or listening to virtually any media on Tuesday afternoon would have been immediately told that at least 500 Palestinians at a hospital in Gaza had been killed by an Israeli airstrike. It was featured with huge online headlines on CNN, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, among others.
The impact of this story, endorsed by much of the mainstream media as credible, was swift: A critical meeting between President Joe Biden and neighboring Arab leaders in Jordan was immediately canceled in protest; riots exploded in cities and capitals around the world. The potential for peace took a backseat to protest over an alleged Israeli atrocity.
But there it finally was — the moral equivalency which too many journalists had been seeking yet were unable to find ever since Hamas carried out the murder of more than 1,200 Israelis on Oct. 7, slaughtering families, beheading infants, and mowing down more than 200 people attending a “peace” concert.
See here, this story implied, Israel is no better: It murders people in hospital beds by the hundreds. And, once it was in print, people like Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and the entire global Hamas propaganda machine will cling to the original storyline and continue to spread it, no matter what the facts.
The true story, as we know it now, is “Errant Islamic Jihad Rocket Explodes in Gaza Hospital Parking Lot.” Search the internet and you will not find a single story with that headline. Instead, you see a slow hour-by-hour walking back of responsibility for the attack, from fingering Israel to making it about what each side says, culminating finally in the Wall Street Journal’s “U.S., Experts Say Evidence Suggests Palestinian Militants’ Rocket Hit Gaza Hospital.”
I love the use of the word “suggest” to soften the blow. I’m not sure U.S. intelligence has a finding with that grading. Remember, they sent out the president of the United States himself to say what they have found, which indicates a lot of confidence since you get fired for “suggestions” like that if they are wrong.
Fake News is an EXISTENTIAL Threat to America!
60 comments:
I saw vid... and where's mountains of corpses? Where's rivers of blood?
Only dozen of burned cars on parking.
And building looks intact.
FAKE news and military Propaganda.
Get use to it... West.
Or else...
I'm sure Dervy still believes...
Of course I believe it. It is a confirmed fact. Though likely it was an errant missile fired by Hamas.
Perfect example of Qtard only believing facts it likes.
How may people were killed, Dervy?
According to you I'm going to guess zero people were killed.
As per Google, "American intelligence agencies have assessed that a deadly blast at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday killed 100 to 300 people".
However... as per Qtard they're all "accomplices". So... the more "accomplices" killed the better, yes?
Scott Adams: 99 percent of the public don't know that the news is fake.
Those are the ones who don't wear tinfoil hats. Scott took his off to film this video. He must be in a Faraday cage. He probably doesn't leave the house without it.
I see that (as per Wikipedia) he is separated from his second wife (and divorcing) as of 2022. I wonder if his descent into nuttery is the reason...
\\Dervish Sanders said...
Of course I believe it. It is a confirmed fact.
OUGH COUGHs... some wise "expert" from CNN TOLD IT.
That counts as "fact"... in feverish Derpy's mind. :-)))))
Now we know it for sure. After all that self-revelations IT did.
\\Perfect example of Qtard only believing facts it likes.
As I said -- I saw the video.
And seen NO corpses... or even REASONs for there being "lots of" corpses.
Video -- its FACTUAL evidance. As in "seeing with own eyes".
But... for Derpy the Idiot, VISIBLE FACTS is NOT facts... only "somebody-somebody who said something-something" is a "fact"... it "bleives in"...
QED
\\...killed 100 to 300 people".
Hah.
VERY precise number.
Like "imagine number between 1 and 10" :-)))))
\\However... as per Qtard they're all "accomplices". So... the more "accomplices" killed the better, yes?
YOU just higer admitted -- that that was Hamas doing.
Do Hamas thinking of own Palestinians being "accomplices"???
*I*... DUNNO.
But YOU, looks like you have much more precise information... from Hamas itself?
How many kneelings per day you do, De-Ru-Pi? ;-P
Scott Admas is a hypnotist. He knows a few things about misdirection.
Qtard: \\Of course I believe it. It is a confirmed fact\\OUGH COUGHs... some wise "expert" from CNN TOLD IT.
"American intelligence agencies have assessed that a deadly blast at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday killed 100 to 300 people".
AP says "A handful of news organizations had maintained a regular presence with bureaus there, including The Associated Press, the BBC, Reuters, Agence France-Presse and Al-Jazeera, with a network of stringers helping others".
CNN isn't on the list...
Qtard: That counts as "fact"... in feverish Derpy's mind.
If CNN knows it firsthand. And it is confirmed by other sources. Then I'd say it is likely true. American Intelligence confirmed it. Though maybe Muslim Brotherhood member Barack Hussein zero-bama commanded his puppet Joe Biden to tell American Intelligence to lie? **sarcasm**
Qtard: Now we know it for sure. After all that self-revelations IT did.
Know what? What "self revelations"? Are you talking about yourself? When you revealed your anti-Muslim bigotry? Or when you revealed that you fantasize about having sex with children?
Qtard: \\Perfect example of Qtard only believing facts it likes.\\As I said -- I saw the video. And seen NO corpses... or even REASONs for there being "lots of" corpses.
They didn't show them. To grewsome. Burnt up. Buried underneath the rubble. Taken to the morgue. Even if the video showed corpses, Qtard would say it was staged. Fake bodies.
Qtard: Video -- its FACTUAL evidance. As in "seeing with own eyes".
So nobody was killed? The death toll on the Palestinian side is zero? Is it zero on the Israeli side too? Or did you see those videos? Videos that showed dead Jewish bodies?
Qtard: But... for Derpy the Idiot, VISIBLE FACTS is NOT facts... only "somebody-somebody who said something-something" is a "fact"... it "bleives in"...
Confirmed by American intelligence.
Qtard: \\...killed 100 to 300 people"\\Hah. VERY precise number. Like "imagine number between 1 and 10" **cruel laughter**
Qtard laughs thinking of dead "accomplices". Was the missile imagined too?
Qtard: \\However... as per Qtard they're all "accomplices". So... the more "accomplices" killed the better, yes?\\YOU just higer admitted -- that that was Hamas doing.
So what? Palestinians died. Confirmed by American Intelligence. They're not accomplices if Hamas accidently killed them?
Qtard: Do Hamas thinking of own Palestinians being "accomplices"???
If they can use them as such. Like killing them (accidently if the missile was "errant") then cry "evil Israel killed Palestinian citizens!".
Qtard: *I*... DUNNO. But YOU, looks like you have much more precise information... from Hamas itself?
American intelligence.
Qtard: How many kneelings per day you do, De-Ru-Pi?
Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pi" is a Muslim who kneels in prayer to Allah? I dunno how many times "De-Ru-Pi" kneels in prayer. Don't care.
Minus: Scott Admas is a hypnotist. He knows a few things about misdirection.
Who has he hypnotized? Himself? His Wikipedia page says "He credits affirmations for many of his achievements". Why didn't he hypnotize either of his two ex wives into not divorcing him? Well, it's obvious he didn't misdirect from his racism. Instead he drew attention to it. And cost himself a LOT of money.
Maybe, but he's still got a lot left. And he's probably traded in the wife for a newer model. :)
\\"American intelligence agencies have assessed that a deadly blast at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday killed 100 to 300 people".
So what???
That still some dude that was incompetent to do the job.
So it trying to cover it's incompetence, by producing fakes.
Like something new.
When chance of punishment seems like negligable, and profit -- high, people tend to lie.
Like you are here... feel itself SO SAFE, that lying EVEN ABOUT OWN WORDS just said/written.
That is Truth that exist for millenias.
\\CNN isn't on the list...
That might say something about their competence... ;-P
\\If CNN knows it firsthand. And it is confirmed by other sources. Then I'd say it is likely true.
What "other source"???
Some lying scumbags in social networks? Affiliated with CNN. Or other machines of spreading lies.
Depry the Idiot DUNNO, that spreading lies became very easy today... and quite profitable. So there's no end of freelancers.
Like that nameless bots that post "Hot Truth" here, recently.
\\American Intelligence confirmed it.
Same as they confirmed WMD in Iraq? ;-P
Derpy the Idiot -- P-R-E-dick-table-ly, is SO DEMN gullible. :-))))
Intelligence services PAID to lie, for the government goals sake.
\\Though maybe Muslim Brotherhood member Barack Hussein zero-bama commanded his puppet Joe Biden to tell American Intelligence to lie? **sarcasm**
Qui prodest?
But to grok such a simple truth... one need to have at least minimally capable brain.
Tough luck for Derpy to get it. With its miniscule impared rotten nut core. ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Perfect example of Qtard only believing facts it likes.\\As I said -- I saw the video. And seen NO corpses... or even REASONs for there being "lots of" corpses.
\\They didn't show them. To grewsome. Burnt up. Buried underneath the rubble. Taken to the morgue. Even if the video showed corpses, Qtard would say it was staged. Fake bodies.
Naaah... that is what liliPut's propaganda and faithful spreaders of liliPut's lies like you DO.
Like when you "see" an "Ukrainian Nazi"... and then spread that falsehood... like that dirty flies spread filth they collected on their feets after crawling by feces.
\\Qtard: Video -- its FACTUAL evidance. As in "seeing with own eyes".
\\So nobody was killed?
On that vid was only burned out cars... well, could be that somebody burned inside em. But building on background was intact.
So... it was doubtfull -- where is that "ruins of hospital with nearly 1000 dead in it???
The same as all over 3000 dead about which "Palesinian government" reports.
Truth -- is the first DIA... on the war.
\\ Is it zero on the Israeli side too? Or did you see those videos? Videos that showed dead Jewish bodies?
Why this questions?
Aren't you trying to spread Anti-Jewish Propaganda AGAIN???
\\Qtard: But... for Derpy the Idiot, VISIBLE FACTS is NOT facts... only "somebody-somebody who said something-something" is a "fact"... it "bleives in"...
\\Confirmed by American intelligence.
MY claim CONFIRMED.
Thanky-thanky, De-Ru-Pi.
\\Qtard: \\...killed 100 to 300 people"\\Hah. VERY precise number. Like "imagine number between 1 and 10" **cruel laughter**
\\Qtard laughs thinking of dead "accomplices". Was the missile imagined too?
Propagandist trick I see. Derailing discussion from facts and into accusing in "having wrong feelings".
Now it is a FACTUAL PROOF that Derpy not just an Idiot and Liar -- but Propagandist Wannabe(?) too.
And by direction of its lie -- it's liliPut's propaganda.
Well, not much surprise in it.
\\Qtard: \\However... as per Qtard they're all "accomplices". So... the more "accomplices" killed the better, yes?\\YOU just higer admitted -- that that was Hamas doing.
\\So what? Palestinians died. Confirmed by American Intelligence. They're not accomplices if Hamas accidently killed them?
Died? Confirmed? Accidentally?
Thanky-thanky... for showing how Modern Propaganda works.
\\If they can use them as such. Like killing them (accidently if the missile was "errant") then cry "evil Israel killed Palestinian citizens!".
Bingo!
\\Qtard: *I*... DUNNO. But YOU, looks like you have much more precise information... from Hamas itself?
\\American intelligence.
Oh... now you CIA member... :-))))))
self-proclaimed. :-))))
\\Qtard: How many kneelings per day you do, De-Ru-Pi?
\\Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pi" is a Muslim who kneels in prayer to Allah? I dunno how many times "De-Ru-Pi" kneels in prayer. Don't care.
Depry confirmed that it's alter-ego(one, or all of em?) doing kneelings. In secret from it? ;-P
Minus FJ is a simp for donald tRump.
Qtard: So what??? That still some dude that was incompetent to do the job. So it trying to cover it's incompetence, by producing fakes. Like something new.
You babbling about your delusions -- no that isn't new. At all.
Qtard: When chance of punishment seems like negligable, and profit -- high, people tend to lie.
What profit? Intelligence people get paid to find facts. Your paranoia tells you they are paid more to find "facts" confirming Palestinians died? Paid less if they found no Palestinians died? Why? Biden is on the side of Hamas? Intelligence officers have no morals? Care only about getting paid?
Qtard: Like you are here... feel itself SO SAFE, that lying EVEN ABOUT OWN WORDS just said/written.
No. You feel safe lying. About my words and your own words.
Qtard: That is Truth that exist for millenias.
No. You think so because you are a pathological liar who thinks everyone else lies -- just like you. Lies as much as you -- which is ALL the time.
Qtard: \\CNN isn't on the list\\That might say something about their competence...
No. Not that I care. You think your diss of CNN would make me angry? I'd feel compelled to defend them?
Qtard: \\If CNN knows it firsthand. And it is confirmed by other sources. Then I'd say it is likely true.\\What "other source"???
I was saying hypothetically. Like with CNN reporter's interview of the self identified Azov Battalion Nazi soldier. That was confirmed by many other sources. Also by videos and images.
Qtard: Some lying scumbags in social networks? Affiliated with CNN. Or other machines of spreading lies.
"Lying scumbags" are reporters telling truths Qtard doesn't like. Truths Qtard calls "Demn propaganda".
Qtard: Depry the Idiot DUNNO, that spreading lies became very easy today... and quite profitable. So there's no end of freelancers.
You mean yourself? You think of yourself as a "freelance" lie teller?
Qtard: Like that nameless bots that post "Hot Truth" here, recently.
A reference to another of your delusions. Obviously. Given that no such thing happened.
Qtard: \\American Intelligence confirmed it\\Same as they confirmed WMD in Iraq?
No. Completely different. We know now that VP Dick Cheney went to the CIA and told them to find intel "confirming" what the administration wanted them to find. To justify going to war in Iraq. So they listened to the lies Curveball told them. Because they liked his lies.
Why would the Biden administration like lies about how many people were killed when an errant Hamas missile hit a hospital parking lot in Gaza? What's the motivation for lying about it? The idiot can't think logically. ONLY knows it doesn't like that it's being reported that innocent Palestinians died. So it MUST be a lie.
Qtard: Derpy the Idiot -- P-R-E-dick-table-ly, is SO DEMN gullible.
"Gullible" to you is my ability to logically determine what the truth likely is.
Qtard: Intelligence services PAID to lie, for the government goals sake.
What goal? Can you explain what the goal of such a lie would be?
Qtard: \\Though maybe Muslim Brotherhood member Barack Hussein zero-bama commanded his puppet Joe Biden to tell American Intelligence to lie? **sarcasm**\\Qui prodest?
Is that a yes? That's what you believe?
Qtard: But to grok such a simple truth... one need to have at least minimally capable brain.
So, not you.
Qtard: Tough luck for Derpy to get it. With its miniscule impared rotten nut core.
Self revealing admission. Though you blame your alter ego, "Derpy".
Qtard: \\Perfect example of Qtard only believing facts it likes.\\...I saw the video. And seen NO corpses...\\They didn't show them. ... Even if the video showed corpses, Qtard would say it was staged. Fake bodies\\Naaah... that is what liliPut's propaganda and faithful spreaders of liliPut's lies like you DO.
As per Google, "Photos and videos show dozens of bodies in sheets, blankets or body bags at the scene".
Here is a picture. Fake? No bodies are under the sheets? Even though you JUST said "Naaah" to my suggestion that it was staged?
Qtard: Like when you "see" an "Ukrainian Nazi"... and then spread that falsehood...
"Falsehood"... that's a fact Qtard doesn't like. In NewSpeak.
Qtard: Video -- its FACTUAL evidance. As in "seeing with own eyes".\\So nobody was killed? On that vid was only burned out cars... well, could be that somebody burned inside em. But building on background was intact. So... it was doubtfull -- where is that "ruins of hospital with nearly 1000 dead in it???
Civilians sheltering outside the hospital were killed. They thought they'd be safe near a hospital because Israel wouldn't target a hospital. The failed rocket hit the courtyard. Not the hospital itself. Confirmed by video.
Also not 1000. American intelligence says 100-300. The Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza Strip says at least 500 were killed.
Qtard: The same as all over 3000 dead about which "Palesinian government" reports.
Missiles are being lobbed into a highly populated area. Is that fake too? Israel isn't firing any missiles? Well, I guess that makes it easier to dismiss dead innocents. Call them "accomplices". Deny they died.
btw, "The Palestinian Health Ministry said Sunday that the death toll in Gaza had reached at least 4,651 people".
Qtard: Truth -- is the first DIA... on the war.
You mean DOA? Yeah. And liar Qtard helps spread lies. Like deaths of Palestinians are all fake.
Qtard: \\Is it zero on the Israeli side too? Or did you see those videos? Videos that showed dead Jewish bodies?\\Why this questions?
Because smart aces ask reasonable questions.
Qtard: Aren't you trying to spread Anti-Jewish Propaganda AGAIN???
Confirmed -- you you saw no videos showing Jewish dead bodies. Just believing one report and disbelieving another -- because one you like and the other you dislike. Me, I believe both. Not "anti-Jewish propaganda". Truth. Backed up by factual reporting. But the liar Qtard hates factual reporting. Only likes narratives that are pleasing to it.
VERY pleasing to Qtard that Jewish people died. Because Israel is then justified in attacking. Killing Hamas AND "accomplices".... aka innocent Palestinians that Qtard hates.
Qtard: But... for Derpy the Idiot, VISIBLE FACTS is NOT facts... only "somebody-somebody who said something-something" is a "fact"... it "bleives in"...\\Confirmed by American intelligence.\\MY claim CONFIRMED.
Confirmed false.
Qtard: Thanky-thanky, De-Ru-Pi.
Self encouragement of your alter ego. Yawn.
Qtard: \\...killed 100 to 300 people"\\Hah. VERY precise number. Like "imagine number between 1 and 10" **cruel laughter**\\Qtard laughs thinking of dead "accomplices". Was the missile imagined too?\\Propagandist trick I see. Derailing discussion from facts and into accusing in "having wrong feelings".
Feelings about a missle? It's on video. A point-to-reality fact. Yet Qtard "feels" there wasn't one?
Qtard: Now it is a FACTUAL PROOF that Derpy not just an Idiot and Liar -- but Propagandist Wannabe(?) too.
Talking about yourself again. But blaming your alter ego, "Derpy". Calling your delusions "factual proof".
Qtard: And by direction of its lie -- it's liliPut's propaganda. Well, not much surprise in it.
Huh? Wouldn't it be Hamas propaganda? Or PA propaganda? I never cited Putin re how many people have died in Gaza. I cited American intelligence.
Qtard: \\However... as per Qtard they're all "accomplices". So... the more "accomplices" killed the better, yes?\\YOU just higer admitted -- that that was Hamas doing.\\So what? Palestinians died. Confirmed by American Intelligence. They're not accomplices if Hamas accidently killed them?\\ Died? Confirmed? Accidentally? Thanky-thanky... for showing how Modern Propaganda works.
Thanking me for your delusions? Again? Qtard showed how propaganda works. When it denied that anyone died. Said American Intelligence sided with Hamas. Or did American Intelligence side with Putin/Get number of Palestinians dead from him?
Qtard: \\If they can use them as such. Like killing them (accidently if the missile was "errant") then cry "evil Israel killed Palestinian citizens!"\\Bingo!
Thanky for admitting you lied about nobody dying when a Hamas missile malfunctioned and hit a hospital courtyard where Palestinians were sheltering.
Qtard: *I*... DUNNO. But YOU, looks like you have much more precise information... from Hamas itself?\\American intelligence.\\Oh... now you CIA member... self-proclaimed.
It's in the news. Google it. If you do Google it and see the same reporting as me... that means you're also in the CIA?
Qtard: How many kneelings per day you do, De-Ru-Pi? ... Depry confirmed that it's alter-ego(one, or all of em?) doing kneelings. In secret from it?
Neither one of us is kneeling in prayer to Allah. I'm not a Muslim. And you hate them. Why you're imaging I am one. Or, that the imaginary "De-Ru-Pi" is one. But "De-Ru-Pi" only exists in your imagination. You made up "De-Ru-Pi", so it does whatever you say it does.
\\What profit? Intelligence people get paid to find facts.
Maybe...
but whoi said that they obliged to give that facts TO YOU. And free of charge?
\\Your paranoia tells you they are paid more to find "facts" confirming Palestinians died? Paid less if they found no Palestinians died? Why?
Not paranoia.
Common Sense, thing you completely lacking.
So. To get that information. There need to be some operative. On the ground. In Gaza.
Disguised as Palestinian. Or even AMONG Hamas members.
And it all under bombs and without steady comunication...
Well, if CIA HAVE such operatives -- I ready to salute to their proves... but, I would not deem it as highly likly.
Most surely, that was "information" from some "analitic" in the deeps of Langley... that made his "estmates" based on some foamy image from spy satelites. ;-P
THAT SAME kind of "analitics"... that gave Bi-den "very true estimates"... that Ukraine will fall in 3 days. :-))))))
Or that Afganistan could be "demn-ok-ratised". ;-P
Demn Science and Demn Wisdom APPLIED! :-))))
\\Intelligence officers have no morals? Care only about getting paid?
Well.
Intelligence Services agent PAID exactly for doing things that any other people would seen as immoral... and ARE prohibited to do.
If you think otherwise -- try to by some snooping device and try to spy...
\\Qtard: Like you are here... feel itself SO SAFE, that lying EVEN ABOUT OWN WORDS just said/written.
\\No. You feel safe lying. About my words and your own words.
And you can POINT to that "lying"... for ver least??? :-))))))
Naaah. You can't.
Because in your twisted NewSpeak tongue it's you calling Truth a Lie. Yawn.
AND YOU NOT ABLE to confirm it with facts/quotes... obviously.
Because Truth -- it's Facts of this World.
While lies -- they just a figments of our imagination. Non-things. ;-P
\\Qtard: That is Truth that exist for millenias.
\\No. You think so because you are a pathological liar who thinks everyone else lies -- just like you. Lies as much as you -- which is ALL the time.
But still... you can't pin EVEN ONE of such my "lies"?
Because you are idiot? Or because you are lying? Or both? ;-P
\\You think your diss of CNN would make me angry? I'd feel compelled to defend them?
Yap.
Nobody like to protect liars. ;-P
Even liars themself.
\\Qtard: \\If CNN knows it firsthand. And it is confirmed by other sources. Then I'd say it is likely true.\\What "other source"???
\\I was saying hypothetically. Like with CNN reporter's interview of the self identified Azov Battalion Nazi soldier. That was confirmed by many other sources. Also by videos and images.
Through all kinds of shady "sources"? Which have spread photoshoped images. And edited vids.
Yeah.
That's how liliPut's Propaganda working.
And you gobbling it in... as Truth. Well, Joe do it too.
Gullible Westerners. Still believe to "truthful vids".
\\"Lying scumbags" are reporters telling truths Qtard doesn't like. Truths Qtard calls "Demn propaganda".
Yap.
"Telling truth".
Without providing raw materials for that that people COULD double-check it for themself. ;-P
\\No. Completely different. We know now that VP Dick Cheney went to the CIA and told them to find intel "confirming" what the administration wanted them to find. To justify going to war in Iraq. So they listened to the lies Curveball told them. Because they liked his lies.
Hah.
But of course... it's IMPOSSIBLE... that Bi-den came,or sent some clerk to CIA with suggestion to find some clues that "HAMAS bombed out that hospital"?
To smooth his ride to Israel.
\\Why would the Biden administration like lies about how many people were killed when an errant Hamas missile hit a hospital parking lot in Gaza? What's the motivation for lying about it?
Im not a spy to know such intrinsic details.
That is YOU are one... who KNOW plans of HAMAS. Remember? ;-P
\\"Gullible" to you is my ability to logically determine what the truth likely is.
:-))))))))))
That derp said "logically". AGAIN. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Intelligence services PAID to lie, for the government goals sake.
\\What goal? Can you explain what the goal of such a lie would be?
Yap.
Idiot.
Cannot parse simple line of text.
\\As per Google, "Photos and videos show dozens of bodies in sheets, blankets or body bags at the scene".
Yap.
Bomb fell... and covered everyone in white sheets... :-))))))
That's how Derpy's mind works? :-))))
\\Qtard: Like when you "see" an "Ukrainian Nazi"... and then spread that falsehood...
\\"Falsehood"... that's a fact Qtard doesn't like. In NewSpeak.
WHERE is video with that "nazi"??? Telling it in his mother tongue?
\\Also not 1000. American intelligence says 100-300. The Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza Strip says at least 500 were killed.
Yap.
Both lying.
\\btw, "The Palestinian Health Ministry said Sunday that the death toll in Gaza had reached at least 4,651 people".
Yeah.
Because they all Truth Tellers. In HAMAS.
Or what -- Derpy the Idiot DO NOT GET IT... that HAMAS -- it's GOVERNMENT of Gaza. So "health mnisrty of Palestina" -- its subordinate of HAMAS too.
LOGIC!
Derpy the Idiot know nothing about.
\\Like deaths of Palestinians are all fake.
Aha.
Because HAMAS members are Innocent and Truth Tellers. ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Is it zero on the Israeli side too? Or did you see those videos? Videos that showed dead Jewish bodies?\\Why this questions?
\\Because smart aces ask reasonable questions.
Yeah.
That's why idiots like you trying to pose as "smart aces"... but they able to ask only dumb and unreasonable ones. ;-P
Or... you can EXPLAIN -- how asking such BS is reasonable. :-)))))
With revealing what BS you deem as "reasonamble".
\\Qtard: Aren't you trying to spread Anti-Jewish Propaganda AGAIN???
\\Confirmed -- you you saw no videos showing Jewish dead bodies. Just believing one report and disbelieving another -- because one you like and the other you dislike. Me, I believe both. Not "anti-Jewish propaganda". Truth. Backed up by factual reporting. But the liar Qtard hates factual reporting. Only likes narratives that are pleasing to it.
Blah-blah-blah. :-))))))
\\Qtard: But... for Derpy the Idiot, VISIBLE FACTS is NOT facts... only "somebody-somebody who said something-something" is a "fact"... it "bleives in"...\\Confirmed by American intelligence.\\MY claim CONFIRMED.
\\Confirmed false.
Yeah.
NewSpeak falsehood talking. ;-P
\\Qtard: Now it is a FACTUAL PROOF that Derpy not just an Idiot and Liar -- but Propagandist Wannabe(?) too.
\\Talking about yourself again. But blaming your alter ego, "Derpy". Calling your delusions "factual proof".
:-))))))))))
\\Qtard: And by direction of its lie -- it's liliPut's propaganda. Well, not much surprise in it.
\\Huh? Wouldn't it be Hamas propaganda? Or PA propaganda? I never cited Putin re how many people have died in Gaza. I cited American intelligence.
Like when you accused Jews in "attempting to genocide Palestinians"?
That was CIA POV on it?
Or just repeating what Anti-Semites of all World chanting.
\\Qtard showed how propaganda works.
And you can POINT to that precise place? QUOTE EXACT WORDS???
Naaah.
You just covering one your BS babbling with another. ;-P
\\Thanky for admitting you lied about nobody dying...
And you can give PRECISE QUOTE???
Naaah.
You just covering one your idiotic lie with another. ;-P
\\Qtard: How many kneelings per day you do, De-Ru-Pi? ... Depry confirmed that it's alter-ego(one, or all of em?) doing kneelings. In secret from it?
\\Neither one of us is kneeling in prayer to Allah. I'm not a Muslim
Oh... Derpy just revealed that it believes that neither of its alter-egos do kneeling. ;-P
Qtard: THAT SAME kind of "analitics"... that gave Bi-den "very true estimates"... that Ukraine will fall in 3 days. Or that Afganistan could be "demn-ok-ratised".
Those are very different than "how many people died". Not in an entire war, either. Just one explosion. Which should be much easier to determine.
Qtard: Demn Science and Demn Wisdom APPLIED!
BULLSHIT. George bush attacked Afghanistan. Thought it could be democratized. George bush is a republican. Yet the IDIOT Qtard thinks gwb is using "Demn science" and "Demn wisdom"? Because? Stupid moron blames Democrats for EVERYTHING.
Qtard: \\Intelligence officers have no morals? Care only about getting paid?\\Well. Intelligence Services agent PAID exactly for doing things that any other people would seen as immoral... and ARE prohibited to do.
No. You think all intelligence officer are like James Bond? Have a "license to kill"?
Qtard: If you think otherwise -- try to by some snooping device and try to spy...
Yeah... I'm not a dummy who thinks intelligence gathering is "immoral".
Qtard: Like you are here... feel itself SO SAFE, that lying EVEN ABOUT OWN WORDS just said/written.\\No. You feel safe lying. About my words and your own words. And you can POINT to that "lying"... for ver least?
Yes. Your claim that Palestinians are all "accomplices" that voted for Hamas. That is a lie.
Qtard: Naaah. You can't.
Can. Just did.
Qtard: Because in your twisted NewSpeak tongue it's you calling Truth a Lie. Yawn.
You describe what you do.
Qtard: While lies -- they just a figments of our imagination. Non-things.
Right. YOUR lies. They're "truths" in YOUR imagination.
Qtard: That is Truth that exist for millenias.\\No. You think so because you are a pathological liar who thinks everyone else lies -- just like you. Lies as much as you -- which is ALL the time.\\But still... you can't pin EVEN ONE of such my "lies"?
Not just one... many lies. Such as (your often repeated) lie that I deny people their rights. Your fabricated quote, "I do deny em their rights". Which I NEVER said.
Qtard: Because you are idiot? Or because you are lying? Or both?
Yeah, both. In regards to YOU.
Qtard: \\You think your diss of CNN would make me angry? I'd feel compelled to defend them?\\Yap. Nobody like to protect liars.
NewSpeak. "Liars" are reporters who reveal truths Qtard doesn't like.
Qtard: Even liars themself.
You? No, I never expected you to defend CNN. Because I know you hate them for reporting facts you don't like.
Qtard: \\If CNN knows it firsthand. And it is confirmed by other sources. Then I'd say it is likely true.\\What "other source"???\\I was saying hypothetically. Like with CNN reporter's interview of the self identified Azov Battalion Nazi soldier. That was confirmed by many other sources. Also by videos and images.\\Through all kinds of shady "sources"? Which have spread photoshoped images. And edited vids.
No. Non photoshopped images showing Azov Battalion members using Nazi symbols. And unedited videos of Azov Battalion members saying they are Nazis.
Qtard: Yeah. That's how liliPut's Propaganda working. And you gobbling it in... as Truth. Well, Joe do it too.
NewSpeak. Calling my rejecting and refuting Putin's propaganda "gobbling it in". You're right about "Joe" though (Minus FJ). He does "gobble it in". Because he is a republiturd. And it's republiturds helping Putin spread his propaganda.
Qtard: Gullible Westerners. Still believe to "truthful vids".
Yeah. Qtard calls it "gullible" to believe facts.
Qtard: \\"Lying scumbags" are reporters telling truths Qtard doesn't like. Truths Qtard calls "Demn propaganda".\\Yap."Telling truth".Without providing raw materials for that that people COULD double-check it for themself.
As if there could be any proof that you'd believe.
Qtard: Hah. ...Bi-den came,or sent some clerk to CIA with suggestion to find some clues that "HAMAS bombed out that hospital"?\\To smooth his ride to Israel.
So now Qtard is saying Hamas didn't bomb the hospital? That's a lie? Israel bombed it? Why are you spreading antisemitic propaganda, Qtard? You are an antisemite?
Qtard: \\Why would the Biden administration like lies about how many people were killed when an errant Hamas missile hit a hospital parking lot in Gaza? What's the motivation for lying about it?\\Im not a spy to know such intrinsic details.
Translation... there is none. Thanky for admitting you lied, Qtard.
Qtard: That is YOU are one... who KNOW plans of HAMAS. Remember?
No. Impossible. I can't "remember" things I never said. Quote? One where I say "I know the plans of Hamas"?
Qtard: \\"Gullible" to you is my ability to logically determine what the truth likely is\\ **moronic laughter** That derp said "logically". AGAIN.
Yeah. I know why Qtard laughs at logic. It hates it.
Qtard: Intelligence services PAID to lie, for the government goals sake.\\What goal? Can you explain what the goal of such a lie would be?\\Yap. Idiot. Cannot parse simple line of text.
Idiot Qtard can't answer simple question.
Qtard: \\As per Google, "Photos and videos show dozens of bodies in sheets, blankets or body bags at the scene". Yap. Bomb fell... and covered everyone in white sheets. **moronic laughter**
Oh, so the picture is fake? If the sheets were moved, there would be no bodies. That's what Qtard believes?
Qtard: That's how Derpy's mind works?
I didn't say anything like that. Qtard came up with that stupidity by itself.
Qtard: Like when you "see" an "Ukrainian Nazi"... and then spread that falsehood... \\"Falsehood"... that's a fact Qtard doesn't like. In NewSpeak.\\WHERE is video with that "nazi"??? Telling it in his mother tongue?
Where is the scoop that reveals a CNN reporter lied? Reported that a Azov soldier identified as a Nazi when he didn't?
Qtard: \\Also not 1000. American intelligence says 100-300. The Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza Strip says at least 500 were killed\\Yap. Both lying.
You were there? Looked under the sheets and saw no bodies with your own eyes?
Qtard: \\btw, "The Palestinian Health Ministry said Sunday that the death toll in Gaza had reached at least 4,651 people"\\Yeah. Because they all Truth Tellers. In HAMAS. Or what -- Derpy the Idiot DO NOT GET IT... that HAMAS -- it's GOVERNMENT of Gaza. So "health mnisrty of Palestina" -- its subordinate of HAMAS too.
I only told you what they said. I didn't say "Oh, yes. They are truth tellers. You can absolutely believe them". Qtard imagined that. Will likely continue to say, "Derpy believes his brother in feith Hamas".
Qtard: LOGIC!
Where? Definitely not from you. Are you talking about my logic?
Qtard: Derpy the Idiot know nothing about.
Your alter ego "Derpy" knows nothing about logic? I agree. Your alter ego Qtard too. It also doesn't know anything about logic.
Qtard: \\Like deaths of Palestinians are all fake\\Aha. Because HAMAS members are Innocent and Truth Tellers.
Because bombs are falling from the skies. Bombs kill people. Logic.
And I never said Hamas is innocent. Hamas is guilty. They are murderers.
Qtard: ...idiots like you trying to pose as "smart aces"... but they able to ask only dumb and unreasonable ones. Or... you can EXPLAIN -- how asking such BS is reasonable.
It's the same question you asked about the Hospital bombing, dipshit.
Qtard: With revealing what BS you deem as "reasonamble".
None. I deem Qtard's BS unreasonable. And I deem nothing "reasonamble". Because there is no such thing as "reasonamble". Dunno wtf "reasonamble" is.
Qtard: Aren't you trying to spread Anti-Jewish Propaganda AGAIN???\\Confirmed -- you you saw no videos showing Jewish dead bodies. ...\\Blah-blah-blah.
"Blah-blah-blah" isn't a rebuttal of anything I wrote. Must mean Qtard agrees everything I wrote is true.
Qtard: But... for Derpy the Idiot, VISIBLE FACTS is NOT facts... only "somebody-somebody who said something-something" is a "fact"... it "bleives in"...\\Confirmed by American intelligence.\\MY claim CONFIRMED\\Confirmed false. Yeah. NewSpeak falsehood talking.
No. And my NO is not a NewSpeak yes. Also not "exactly what a liar would say". Because I tell the truth.
Qtard: Now it is a FACTUAL PROOF that Derpy not just an Idiot and Liar -- but Propagandist Wannabe(?) too\\Talking about yourself again. But blaming your alter ego, "Derpy". Calling your delusions "factual proof". **moronic laughter**
Laughing rebutts nothing I wrote. Means... Qtard agrees what I wrote is true.
Qtard: And by direction of its lie -- it's liliPut's propaganda. Well, not much surprise in it\\Huh? Wouldn't it be Hamas propaganda? Or PA propaganda? I never cited Putin re how many people have died in Gaza. I cited American intelligence\\Like when you accused Jews in "attempting to genocide Palestinians"?
Never did. Because they aren't.
Qtard: That was CIA POV on it?
No.
Qtard: Or just repeating what Anti-Semites of all World chanting.
No. I was summarizing your strong inner desire. For them all to be killed. Israel isn't going to genocide the Palestinian people. They're going to try and minimize the loss of life. Not kill people you call "accomplices".
Qtard: \\Qtard showed how propaganda works\\And you can POINT to that precise place? QUOTE EXACT WORDS???
When you called innocent Palestinians "accomplices". Your denial that anyone died when the Hamas missile malfunctioned and hit a hospital courtyard where people were sheltering. That's propaganda being used by Palestinian haters like you.
Qtard: \\Thanky for admitting you lied about nobody dying\\ And you can give PRECISE QUOTE???
I wrote: If they can use them as such. Like killing them (accidently if the missile was errant) then cry "evil Israel killed Palestinian citizens!
And you wrote: Bingo!
Meaning you AGREED that Palestinians died. Why'd you write "bingo" if NOT agreeing?
Qtard: Naaah. You just covering one your idiotic lie with another.
You lied. About your own damn words. Or WORD. Wrote "bingo" in AGREEMENT with me saying Palestinians died. Now you're denying it. "Never said it"??
Qtard: Oh... Derpy just revealed that it believes that neither of its alter-egos do kneeling.
No. Because they are your alter egos.
"Errant missile" Dervish? Is that the latest excuse of the day?
\\Qtard: THAT SAME kind of "analitics"... that gave Bi-den "very true estimates"... that Ukraine will fall in 3 days. Or that Afganistan could be "demn-ok-ratised".
\\Those are very different than "how many people died". Not in an entire war, either. Just one explosion. Which should be much easier to determine.
And still... they gave that BS "estimate" "100-300" :-)))))
That's how *competent* that "analitics" ARE.
But Derpy... still believe to MERE WORDS of that morons, because it is moron iitself, and wired up to moronic DEMN propaganda. :-)))))
Now it all looks clear. ;-P
Morons for other morons producing "facts". :-))))
Or that is... marans?
\\No. You think all intelligence officer are like James Bond? Have a "license to kill"?
See!
That's why I like to stirr you to make such burps.
Such a flavlessly idiotic non sequitur. :-))))
\\Yeah... I'm not a dummy who thinks intelligence gathering is "immoral".
:-))))))
Yap.
While that is DEMNs collecting info on Reps. ;-P
\\Yes. Your claim that Palestinians are all "accomplices" that voted for Hamas. That is a lie.
Bombs do not ask.
HAMAS's it's missle... or Israel's, or Rush'A's, or Ukrainian... or whichever.
So... choice need to be done BEFORE war started.
\\You describe what you do.
And I MUST deem as Truth this apparently lying words of idiotic liar??? :-)))))
\\Qtard: While lies -- they just a figments of our imagination. Non-things.
\\Right. YOUR lies. They're "truths" in YOUR imagination.
Why I CAN point to em, and make QUOTE of em??? That "lies".
And you CAN'T. ;-P
\\Not just one... many lies. Such as (your often repeated) lie that I deny people their rights. Your fabricated quote, "I do deny em their rights". Which I NEVER said.
tch-tch-tch... but you HAVE SAID "I *DO* deny..." -- and that is CORRECT REFERENCE I ONLY used.
That is YOUR lie... that I "fabricated quote". Deliberate and apparent LIE.
You do that to mud the water... with your feces. And to shrug off anyn guilt for lying. Because your DEMN cult from that "figment of a shame"???
And you REPEATED it here, recently.
That you "*DO* deny" em "having such rights" -- what is EVEN MORE egregious.
As that is HUMAN Rights -- they IMMANENT of humans. Means NOBODY CAN separate people from em.
But still... you stibbornly CONTINUE saying that -- that they CAN be sparsed of em.
Like Nazis did to Jews.
\\Yeah, both. In regards to YOU.
Baseless derping. AGAIN!
Yawn. :-))))
\\NewSpeak. "Liars" are reporters who reveal truths Qtard doesn't like.
Yeah. Babbling something-something that suits propaganda needs.
While NOT providing FACTUAL raw data.
Yawn.
\\No. Non photoshopped images showing Azov Battalion members using Nazi symbols. And unedited videos of Azov Battalion members saying they are Nazis.
WHERE???
Why you still NOT gave any links to such "truthful vids"????
\\NewSpeak. Calling my rejecting and refuting Putin's propaganda "gobbling it in".
Well.
YET ONE time.
When Derpy the Idiotic Hyporite makes SELF-CONTRADICTING claims... just in a next sentence.
Higher... you claimed that there is some "truthful vids" that show "Ukrainain Nazis"... while ALL such vids are product of liliPut's Propaganda.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Gullible Westerners. Still believe to "truthful vids".
\\Yeah. Qtard calls it "gullible" to believe facts.
Facts that somebody-somebody have babbled something-something??? ;-P
Well... whole Internet FULL of such "facts". :-))))
Drepy the Idiot CANNOT distinguish from Relity.
Basment hermit? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\"Lying scumbags" are reporters telling truths Qtard doesn't like. Truths Qtard calls "Demn propaganda".\\Yap."Telling truth".Without providing raw materials for that that people COULD double-check it for themself.
\\As if there could be any proof that you'd believe.
Bulshit claim. As ever.
Like that is NOT ME... who pointed to ONLY TRUE definition of what FACTS is.
And gave for at least TWO examples of such facts of Reality -- Sun rising in the Morning... and dRump NOT put in jail. ;-P
But well... there is grain of Truth in this words of Derpy the Idiot, for at least.
I do not need its "proofs"... as it ASTONISINGLY UNABLE to provide any. It cannot eve make a quote... the right way. Without mangling it.
To "believe in" especially.
I have ears, and eys, for FACTS ONLY. ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Why would the Biden administration like lies about how many people were killed when an errant Hamas missile hit a hospital parking lot in Gaza? What's the motivation for lying about it?\\Im not a spy to know such intrinsic details.
\\Translation... there is none. Thanky for admitting you lied, Qtard.
Yawn.
And you can give QUOTE that "my" lie???
Of course not, because it'll make it apparent -- that that YOUR OWN WORDS again.
Yawn.
And what that "Translation..." mean? Isn't it "what Derpy thinks Q meaned" -- to which you protested, accusing that is what *I* do to you?
While I giving PRECISELY CORRECT QUOTES ONLY. ;-P
Or what... blessed with DEMN MIGHT you deem itself ALLOWED to use such miserly tricks -- all is needed -- to accuse opponent in doing it, and VIOLA, DEMN derp can use it... itself??? :-))))))
That is how it works, in your DEMN mind? :-)))
\\Qtard: That is YOU are one... who KNOW plans of HAMAS. Remember?
\\No. Impossible. I can't "remember" things I never said. Quote? One where I say "I know the plans of Hamas"?
Well. You sounded very sure... that "that plans of HAMAS started MUCH EARLIER then that 100 millions was arranged"...
\\Qtard: \\"Gullible" to you is my ability to logically determine what the truth likely is\\ **moronic laughter** That derp said "logically". AGAIN.
\\Yeah. I know why Qtard laughs at logic. It hates it.
Yap.
Derpy's derping that it know what LOGIC is about... while it DUNNO even what FACT is...
make me laughing. Every time.
So, please. Do it MOAR. Such your moronic claims.
\\Qtard: Intelligence services PAID to lie, for the government goals sake.\\What goal? Can you explain what the goal of such a lie would be?\\Yap. Idiot. Cannot parse simple line of text.
\\Idiot Qtard can't answer simple question.
Simple for idiots?
But I am not idiot to know what simple answer for their simple qustions they have in their moronic mind.
You -- tell. ;-P
HINT. That was PLURAL "goals". NOT "goal". Which sugghests ANY goal government would see fit -- like "confirming WMD in Iraq". Or "attack at USA ship in Vietnam". Or... finding some "Ukrainian Nazis"... so DEMN party would have "plausible" reason to postpone help to Ukraine.
Anything and everything.
That will not be called "secret services"... if that'd not be about spreading lies. ;-P
Or hiding some truthes.
\\Oh, so the picture is fake? If the sheets were moved, there would be no bodies. That's what Qtard believes?
I... cannot know what under that sheets.
As nobody else.
But... idiots like Derpy can BELIEVE... into whtever they was said there is...
\\Qtard: That's how Derpy's mind works?
\\I didn't say anything like that. Qtard came up with that stupidity by itself.
Yap.
Because Derpy the Idiot LACKS even MOST basic of Common Sence.
Like understanding that after bombing... there CANNOT be people covered in white feather sheets -- that's somebody else have come -- and covered em...
well, if there are corpses, under that sheets. Or that is a place of bombing at all.
NOTHING on that picture suggests -- where and by whom was made that image. And HOW it related to said "bombing of hospital".
As De-Ru-Pun itself said -- bomb fell OUTSIDE. And destroed car parking.
SO??? WHAT this alleged "corpses" doing INSIDE some unrecognizable room???
\\Qtard: Like when you "see" an "Ukrainian Nazi"... and then spread that falsehood... \\"Falsehood"... that's a fact Qtard doesn't like. In NewSpeak.\\WHERE is video with that "nazi"??? Telling it in his mother tongue?
\\Where is the scoop that reveals a CNN reporter lied?
And HOW there can be such "scoop"????
If we have NO evidances that that reporter EVEN WAS in Ukraine???
And not just typed in some "plausible sounding story", while sitting in his home office???
Where is RAW data???
And who'd be doing such investigation? CIA???
Some "seeking truth" DEMNs??? :-)))))
Maybe Derpy the Idiot so challenged, so it would decide to embark on such a holy Grail seeking mission??? :-)))))
Naaaaah.
DEMNs (and most of Westerners) just like to lia deep in their shit. In their craddle made of lies, by their government.
Too comfy and safe.
But not for long...
\\Qtard: \\Also not 1000. American intelligence says 100-300. The Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza Strip says at least 500 were killed\\Yap. Both lying.
\\You were there? Looked under the sheets and saw no bodies with your own eyes?
NEITHER provided vivid FACTS.
That's enough to come to conclusion about lying.
As... and that is COMMON SENSE -- BOTH have had means to provide ACCURATE info.
But neither DID.
And there is war. And in time of war Truth is DIA in the first place.
\\Qtard: \\btw, "The Palestinian Health Ministry said Sunday that the death toll in Gaza had reached at least 4,651 people"\\Yeah. Because they all Truth Tellers. In HAMAS. Or what -- Derpy the Idiot DO NOT GET IT... that HAMAS -- it's GOVERNMENT of Gaza. So "health mnisrty of Palestina" -- its subordinate of HAMAS too.
\\I only told you what they said.
DID YOU THINK that I STILL NOT GOT IT???? :-))))
While that is ALL... urbi et orbi ALL. What you was doing HERE. In WHOLE year passed.
You was giving somebody-somebody saying something-something.
And then trying to BLAME me for "not believing Truth"... when I was POINTING wisely -- that is just FACTLESS babbling.
Of that somebody-somebody's... or your own. ;-P
\\Qtard: LOGIC!
\\Where? Definitely not from you. Are you talking about my logic?
Ha-ha-ha.
What a counter-factual BS. AGAIN!
And that DIRECTLY AFTER you was PRESSED to admit -- that "ministry of heakth" -- it's the same HAMAS subordiante... ADMITTED THAT *MY* LOGIC is flawless.
So you even tryed to back off from your previous lies. With "I didn't say "Oh, yes. They are truth tellers. You can absolutely believe them". Qtard imagined that. Will likely continue to say, "Derpy believes his brother in feith Hamas"." -- YOUR OWN WORDS, PRECISELY CITED.
And now it trying to PRETEND that it DIDN'T saw that logic.
Well, could be that that is truthful self-revelation -- idiots UNABLE to grok LOGIC... even when smashed with own faces into it.
I... can believe it. ;-P
\\Because bombs are falling from the skies. Bombs kill people. Logic.
That people WARNED about that bomb will fall.
And they live in a place where bombing happens often.
And they have bomb shelters and even whole undeground cities there.
So... yeah. When HAMAS started a war... they was not thingking that there'd be retaliation and bomb will start falling.
And "innocent" Palestinians was so dumb, to not take cover.
Well... most probably Derpy the Idiot judging basing on own idiocy -- it, for sure would not take cover. And would going by streets... because it thinks it is "innocent", and bombs will notice it... and will not make harm... to it??? :-))))))
\\Qtard: ...idiots like you trying to pose as "smart aces"... but they able to ask only dumb and unreasonable ones. Or... you can EXPLAIN -- how asking such BS is reasonable.
\\It's the same question you asked about the Hospital bombing, dipshit.
Oh yeah??? And you even can QUOTE it? And EXPLAIN how it relates here? ;-P
Naaah.
\\"Blah-blah-blah" isn't a rebuttal of anything I wrote. Must mean Qtard agrees everything I wrote is true.
:-))))))))
Whatever you feverish rotten coconut can come up with. ;-P
\\No. And my NO is not a NewSpeak yes. Also not "exactly what a liar would say". Because I tell the truth.
"truth" not based on any facts???
that is what religious delusion is. ;-P
and religious bonkers like to scream "I saying TRUTH!!" damn often TOO. :-))))
\\No. I was summarizing your strong inner desire.
And revealed with it YOUR OWN strong desire to lie? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Qtard showed how propaganda works\\And you can POINT to that precise place? QUOTE EXACT WORDS???
\\When you called innocent Palestinians "accomplices".
1. They living in the same state.
2. They chose HAMAS as their government.
3. They have relatives in HAMAS and working in it's structures.
4. They DID NOTHING to prevent the war and masacres.
THAT IS -- what accomplices DO.
Or... you can give YOUR definition.
\\Your denial that anyone died when the Hamas missile malfunctioned and hit a hospital courtyard where people were sheltering. That's propaganda being used by Palestinian haters like you.
And you can give QUOTE?
Naaah. :-))))
\\And you wrote: Bingo!
\\Meaning you AGREED that Palestinians died. Why'd you write "bingo" if NOT agreeing?
Take your time. And go consult with Google. ;-P
\\Qtard: Naaah. You just covering one your idiotic lie with another.
\\You lied. About your own damn words. Or WORD. Wrote "bingo" in AGREEMENT with me saying Palestinians died. Now you're denying it. "Never said it"??
Go!
Reveal my lies.
With PRECISE QUOTES.
But, naaah.
You will not do that.
Ever.
Because you know DEMN well -- that that is ALWAYS OUR OWN DEMN WORDS.
You tryed to strawman me with. And to gasslight me to bleive it was MY words. :-))))))
What a silly-silly liar... this De-Ru-Pun. Totally idiotic liar. :-))))
STILL thinking that much smarter opponent will fall into its tarpit of lies it struggling in... itself. :-)))))
But you, continue-continue struggling. ;-P
\\No. Because they are your alter egos.
And we should believe to this words of apparent liar, BECASUE??? :-)))))
Well... Im kidding. There is NO such reason.
To believe to such idiotic lies oif such moronic liar -- it's only idiot can do. :-))))
That's why IT believe to ITS... and anybody else's mere words. :-)))))
Such an idiot. :-))))))
\\Blogger Q-Anon, A Highly Intelligent Commentator And Snarky Dude! said...
"Errant missile" Dervish? Is that the latest excuse of the day?
Yap.
Thousands of missles was fired. Without reports of malfunctioning (which is surprising by itself, such a quality).
And then... ONE OF THOUSANDS -- hit secific hospital. And so carefully -- to provide flashy images for headlines... bit even did't hit the structure...
"errant missle" -- new word in weapon production.
All previous "precise munitions" looks bleak in comparation.
Maybe USA need to dump all it's useless Tomahawks... and instead buy out all stockpiles of "errant missles" -- as they seems like much more capable... to blow minds of people. ;-P
The Arabs call it the In'sh Allah missile. It lands wherever Allah decides.
Qtard: And still... they gave that BS "estimate" "100-300".
Qtard's sources say nobody died? Everyone took shelter in that (imaginary) underground city it babbled about previously?
Qtard: That's how *competent* that "analitics" ARE. But Derpy... still believe to MERE WORDS of that morons...
No. I disbelieve your moronic words. I believe the words of US intelligence. Unless given a reason to disbelieve. I asked you why American Intelligence would lie, and you said "Im not a spy to know such intrinsic details".
That's a precise exact quote. "I don't know, I just feel they lied"... That is what is BS. If there is no reason for them to lie (which you admitted there is not) ... Means... they likely told the truth. Logic!
Qtard: ...because it is moron itself, and wired up to moronic DEMN propaganda.
No. Because I'm not a paranoid tinfoil hat nutter like you.
Qtard: Yap. While that is DEMNs collecting info on Reps.
wtf are you talking about? Opposition research? Those are different things. Opposition research is done by political operatives. Intelligence gathering is done by nonpartisan government employees.
Qtard: Bombs do not ask. HAMAS's it's missle... or Israel's, or Rush'A's, or Ukrainian... or whichever. So... choice need to be done BEFORE war started.
I dunno what you are babbling about. Palestinians had no choice.
Qtard: And I MUST deem as Truth this apparently lying words of idiotic liar???
No. As a liar you MUST deem my honest words to be lies.
Qtard: Why I CAN point to em, and make QUOTE of em??? That "lies".
You never did that.
Qtard: And you CAN'T.
Just did. Pointed to your lie about all Palestinians being accomplices. And your lie that Palestinians voted for Hamas.
Qtard: tch-tch-tch... but you HAVE SAID "I *DO* deny..." -- and that is CORRECT REFERENCE I ONLY used.
Lie. You added "em their rights". Stopped doing that. But still saying that is what I was saying. Which I never did. Because I strongly support people having rights.
Qtard: That is YOUR lie... that I "fabricated quote". Deliberate and apparent LIE.
It is YOUR lie. Deliberate and apparent. You did fabricate a quote. You fabricated many quotes. Continue to fabricate them.
Qtard: You do that to mud the water... with your feces. And to shrug off anyn guilt for lying.
Sounds like an admission. Talking not to me, but to yourself.
Qtard: Because your DEMN cult from that "figment of a shame"???
Gibberish.
Qtard: And you REPEATED it here, recently. That you "*DO* deny" em "having such rights"...
Because they did not have the right to try and install the loser of the election. A free and fair democratic election. When there was (as per Locke) no "long train of abuses".
Qtard: ...what is EVEN MORE egregious. As that is HUMAN Rights -- they IMMANENT of humans. Means NOBODY CAN separate people from em.
If you don't have a right to begin with -- you can't be separated from it. Logic!
Qtard: But still... you stibbornly CONTINUE saying that -- that they CAN be sparsed of em.
Nope. Never said.
Qtard: Like Nazis did to Jews.
No. Because Jews had rights. Have rights (as Jews did)? They can't be taken away. Don't have rights (as J6 insurrectionists did not -- there is no sore loser right to overthrow democracy)? They can't be taken away because they NEVER had them to begin with.
\\Qtard: And still... they gave that BS "estimate" "100-300".
\\Qtard's sources say nobody died? Everyone took shelter in that (imaginary) underground city it babbled about previously?
That is same CIA analitics who say about that underground tunnels.
But... Derpy DO NOT care about facts -- truth it or not -- ONLY about WHO'S saying it, yes? ;-P
And derive "truthfulness" from friend or foe told that.
That propaganda piglet, De-Ru-Pi.
And...
DIRECT CONFIRMATRION!
\\Qtard: That's how *competent* that "analitics" ARE. But Derpy... still believe to MERE WORDS of that morons...
\\No. I disbelieve your moronic words. I believe the words of US intelligence.
\\ That is what is BS. If there is no reason for them to lie (which you admitted there is not) ... Means... they likely told the truth. Logic!
But... there is WHOLE PILE of reasons for them to lie, or to conseal truth...
Why they called secret? Why they called security? Services.
Secret Truth Teller... that's only moron Derpy think possible. ;-P
\\Qtard: Yap. While that is DEMNs collecting info on Reps.
\\wtf are you talking about? Opposition research? Those are different things.
Yap.
Just give it another name (euphemism) and it'll re-tool crime in non-crime.
Truth of DEMNs. Piled up onto Honesty of DEMNs. :-))))
Like something new.
\\I dunno what you are babbling about. Palestinians had no choice.
Yap.
Because Derpy the Idiot dclared that Human Rights do not exist...
\\Qtard: And I MUST deem as Truth this apparently lying words of idiotic liar???
\\No. As a liar you MUST deem my honest words to be lies.
Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then??? ;-P
Like THIS immediately following LIE.
\\Qtard: Why I CAN point to em, and make QUOTE of em??? That "lies".
\\You never did that.
Yeah? And you can QUOTE it. ;-P
\\Just did. Pointed to your lie about all Palestinians being accomplices. And your lie that Palestinians voted for Hamas.
After that as it itself gave link about elections??? In 2005 right?
Counter-factual lie. Of idiotic liar Derpy.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: tch-tch-tch... but you HAVE SAID "I *DO* deny..." -- and that is CORRECT REFERENCE I ONLY used.
\\Lie. You added "em their rights". Stopped doing that. But still saying that is what I was saying. Which I never did. Because I strongly support people having rights.
So??? Now you ready to ADMIT that that people -- HAVE HAD right... right to decide for themself, human right -- to come to Capitol, and to demand their question being answered? ;-P
\\Qtard: That is YOUR lie... that I "fabricated quote". Deliberate and apparent LIE.
\\It is YOUR lie. Deliberate and apparent. You did fabricate a quote. You fabricated many quotes. Continue to fabricate them.
And you can QUOTE one???
Why you CANNOT quote EVEN ONE??? :-)))))
\\Sounds like an admission. Talking not to me, but to yourself.
Talking with own alter-egos again? ;-P
\\Qtard: And you REPEATED it here, recently. That you "*DO* deny" em "having such rights"...
\\Because they did not have the right to try and install the loser of the election.
The same as Fathers Founder have had no right to conspire against crown? ;-P
\\When there was (as per Locke) no "long train of abuses".
Was Locke a vitness??? Could he weight what they feel are "long train of abuses" to that people?
\\Qtard: ...what is EVEN MORE egregious. As that is HUMAN Rights -- they IMMANENT of humans. Means NOBODY CAN separate people from em.
\\If you don't have a right to begin with -- you can't be separated from it. Logic!
Yap.
Logic of Nazism.
And you are NAZI, herr Derpung, it seems. ;-P
Jedem das Seine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Jedem_das_Seine
During World War II the phrase was cynically used by the Nazis as a motto displayed over the entrance of Buchenwald concentration camp. This has resulted in use ...
\\Nope. Never said.
YET ONE EXAMPLE of Next Sentence LIE.
YOU just said. Just above.
"If you don't have a right to begin with -- you can't be separated from it. Logic!"
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Like Nazis did to Jews.
\\No. Because Jews had rights. Have rights (as Jews did)? They can't be taken away. Don't have rights (as J6 insurrectionists did not -- there is no sore loser right to overthrow democracy)? They can't be taken away because they NEVER had them to begin with.
Because they non-humans?
That is what your nazi-logic suggests. ;-P
Qtard: That is same CIA analitics who say about that underground tunnels.
You babbled about underground cities. Said all Gaza citizens were safe from bombs there. That's way different than tunnels. Used by Hamas. Not Gaza citizens.
Qtard: But... Derpy DO NOT care about facts -- truth it or not -- ONLY about WHO'S saying it, yes?
Your alter ego? Yeah, it does only care about who is saying it. Said it believed Israel but not American intelligence.
Qtard: And derive "truthfulness" from friend or foe told that.
Sounds like your reasoning.
Qtard: That propaganda piglet, De-Ru-Pi.
Self encouragement.
Qtard: DIRECT CONFIRMATRION!
Where? And of what?
Qtard: But... there is WHOLE PILE of reasons for them to lie, or to conseal truth...
Which are?? Tell me one. Of the "pile".
Qtard: Why they called secret? Why they called security? Services.
So enemies don't find out.
Qtard: Secret Truth Teller... that's only moron Derpy think possible.
I don't even know what you're babbling about.
Qtard: \\Opposition research? Those are different things.\\Yap. Just give it another name (euphemism) and it'll re-tool crime in non-crime.
What crime?
Qtard: Truth of DEMNs. Piled up onto Honesty of DEMNs. Like something new.
I don't even know what you're babbling about.
Qtard: \\Palestinians had no choice.\\Yap.Because Derpy the Idiot dclared that Human Rights do not exist...
No. Never declared. Also... Non sequitur.
Qtard: Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then???
Can be. Have been.
Qtard: Like THIS immediately following LIE.\\Qtard: Why I CAN point to em, and make QUOTE of em??? That "lies".\\You never did that. Yeah? And you can QUOTE it.
Quote lies from me that you didn't point to? How can I quote things you didn't say? About lies I didn't tell?
Qtard: \\...your lie that Palestinians voted for Hamas.\\After that as it itself gave link about elections??? In 2005 right?
And not since. Thanky for admitting you lied.
Qtard: Now you ready to ADMIT that that people -- HAVE HAD right... right to decide for themself, human right -- to come to Capitol, and to demand their question being answered?
No. Because that didn't isn't what happened. I didn't see anyone asking questions.
Qtard: That is YOUR lie... that I "fabricated quote". Deliberate and apparent LIE.\\It is YOUR lie. Deliberate and apparent. You did fabricate a quote. ... \\And you can QUOTE one???
Yes.
Qtard: Why you CANNOT quote EVEN ONE???
I can.
Like... "I *do* deny em their rights". Quoted many times.
Qtard: \\Sounds like an admission. Talking not to me, but to yourself.\\Talking with own alter-egos again?
No. You were talking to your alter egos. You're angry that I butted in?
Qtard: And you REPEATED it here, recently. That you "*DO* deny" em "having such rights"...\\Because they did not have the right to try and install the loser of the election.\\The same as Fathers Founder have had no right to conspire against crown?
No. Different. Not the same.
Qtard: \\When there was (as per Locke) no "long train of abuses"\\Was Locke a vitness??? Could he weight what they feel are "long train of abuses" to that people?
Feelings?? What about facts? Qtard doesn't care about them? Just feelings? Feelings don't allow committing of crimes. They "felt" the election was stolen, so came to the Capitol to "ask questions". But didn't ask questions.
Instead they broke into the Capitol. Vandalized it. Threatened lawmaker's lives. You think it was their "human right" to commit those crimes? Because you're an idiot?
Qtard: ...what is EVEN MORE egregious. As that is HUMAN Rights -- they IMMANENT of humans. Means NOBODY CAN separate people from em.\\If you don't have a right to begin with -- you can't be separated from it. Logic!\\Yap. Logic of Nazism.
No. Jewish people weren't vandalizing government buildings or threatening the lives of lawmakers.
Qtard: And you are NAZI, herr Derpung, it seems.
No. Also, you said they are all dead. Remember?
Qtard: Jedem das Seine - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Jedem_das_Seine...
And what does that have to do with this discussion?
Qtard: \\Nope. Never said\\YET ONE EXAMPLE of Next Sentence LIE. YOU just said. Just above. "If you don't have a right to begin with -- you can't be separated from it. Logic!"
So what? Qtard doesn't understand logic? Says logic is a "lie"?
Qtard: Like Nazis did to Jews.\\No. Because Jews had rights. Have rights (as Jews did)? They can't be taken away. Don't have rights (as J6 insurrectionists did not -- there is no sore loser right to overthrow democracy)? They can't be taken away because they NEVER had them to begin with.\\Because they non-humans?
That is what you think? Because I never said that. Said they absolutely are humans.
Qtard: That is what your nazi-logic suggests.
No. I don't use "Nazi logic". Never said humans aren't humans.
It is my "human right" to kill whoever I want? I'll say it was self defense. I decided for myself that dude was going to kill me. Unless I killed him first. Isn't self defense a human right?
\\Dervish Sanders said...
It is my "human right" to kill whoever I want?
DECIDE to kill... whoever YOU thought and feel inflicted load of unbearable suffering on you... like existance of MAGA dRump -- for example. ;-P
\\I'll say it was self defense. I decided for myself that dude was going to kill me. Unless I killed him first. Isn't self defense a human right?
If you'd be able to prove it in court...
\\Qtard: That is what your nazi-logic suggests.
\\No. I don't use "Nazi logic". Never said humans aren't humans.
Yap. Only non-humans are non-humans. As that nasty "J6 insurrectioinists", yes? ;-P
\\Qtard: Like Nazis did to Jews.\\No. Because Jews had rights. Have rights (as Jews did)? They can't be taken away. Don't have rights (as J6 insurrectionists did not -- there is no sore loser right to overthrow democracy)? They can't be taken away because they NEVER had them to begin with.\\Because they non-humans?
\\That is what you think? Because I never said that. Said they absolutely are humans.
But... have not, do not deserve to have? Human Rights.
Even though it is immanents -- being human, having rights.
But Nazi-Derpy thinks it have a RIGHT to deny OTHER people Human Rights... on it's whim... like that Nazis thought.
\\Qtard: \\Nope. Never said\\YET ONE EXAMPLE of Next Sentence LIE. YOU just said. Just above. "If you don't have a right to begin with -- you can't be separated from it. Logic!"
\\So what? Qtard doesn't understand logic? Says logic is a "lie"?
Yap.
This exactly (in quotes) LIE is long as known.
As fallacy
Eubulides and his paradoxes | OUPblog
blog.oup.com › eubulides-paradoxes-philosophy
You have not lost horns. So you still have horns. Most philosophers would now regard this as a simple sophism. Indeed, it is a standard fallacy, ...
\\No. Jewish people weren't vandalizing government buildings or threatening the lives of lawmakers.
So what?
\\Instead they broke into the Capitol. Vandalized it. Threatened lawmaker's lives. You think it was their "human right" to commit those crimes? Because you're an idiot?
It was their right to DECIDE that they need to ask some questions... of that lawmakers directly.
And that is not only their Human Right, that is THEIR UNDENYABLE RIGHT as eligible voters.
But that lawmakers runned away, instead of ansevering.
Which made em rightfully pissed. And pissed people, not behave very peaceful and rational... that's in human nature too.
\\Qtard: And you REPEATED it here, recently. That you "*DO* deny" em "having such rights"...\\Because they did not have the right to try and install the loser of the election.\\The same as Fathers Founder have had no right to conspire against crown?
\\No. Different. Not the same.
ONLY difference that in case of Fathers Founders it was success story...
and they, as winners, teached to glorify their deeds.
\\No. You were talking to your alter egos. You're angry that I butted in?
:-)))))))
You think I am one of your alter-egos? :-))))
Well, quite could be. It seems that there is such a noisy chorus there... inside your scull, that you freakingly cannot distinguish with whom you talking. ;-P
\\Qtard: Why you CANNOT quote EVEN ONE???
\\I can.
\\Like... "I *do* deny em their rights". Quoted many times.
Yep.
Faked. ;-P
As I ALWAYS give CORRECT ref "I *DO* deny...".
And that other part "em their rights" is just MY summary or your other words.
\\Qtard: \\...your lie that Palestinians voted for Hamas.\\After that as it itself gave link about elections??? In 2005 right?
\\And not since. Thanky for admitting you lied.
Well... theyu chose their fate that time.
And who are you to DICTATE what VOTING LAWS must be in their country?
What if their laws say that elections once in nlifetime is just enough? ;-P
\\Qtard: Like THIS immediately following LIE.\\Qtard: Why I CAN point to em, and make QUOTE of em??? That "lies".\\You never did that. Yeah? And you can QUOTE it.
\\Quote lies from me that you didn't point to? How can I quote things you didn't say? About lies I didn't tell?
So... you still ABLE to see such logical misses in texts... :-)))
But not in your own words.
Or... your own words you just treating differently? ;-p
\\Qtard: Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then???
\\Can be. Have been.
THEN.
You MUST be able to do that EVERY TIME.
But... you DO NOT DO that.
Only spawning false claims like this one -- that you did it sometime/somewhere... WITHOUT COIRRECT REFFERING to when and where. ;-P
Which is tactics of liars.
Congrats, De-Ru-Pun. ;-P You are liar.
Thought I would not see through such a miserly trick? :-))))
\\Qtard: \\Opposition research? Those are different things.\\Yap. Just give it another name (euphemism) and it'll re-tool crime in non-crime.
\\What crime?
Thanky-thanky for confirmation. ;-P
\\Qtard: Why they called secret? Why they called security? Services.
\\So enemies don't find out.
Yap. And enemies could/should be feeded with lies too.
But whom government treating as enemies, too? ;-P
\\Qtard: But... there is WHOLE PILE of reasons for them to lie, or to conseal truth...
\\Which are?? Tell me one. Of the "pile".
Ehm... like, to be elected yet one time? ;-P
\\Qtard: And derive "truthfulness" from friend or foe told that.
\\Sounds like your reasoning.
Of course. Good deminstration.
You treating my like a foe... and treating my words accordingly.
Like by doubting me being foreigner. ;-P
\\Your alter ego? Yeah, it does only care about who is saying it. Said it believed Israel but not American intelligence.
Because.
Israel provided HARD evidances -- videos.
And there is SEPARATE confirmation -- from their enemies, that they did it.
I have seen nothing like that from USA spys... in ages.
Last time I remember, history wise, that was in Caribean Crysis... when they gave that fotos of Russian Rockets on Cuba.
\\You babbled about underground cities. Said all Gaza citizens were safe from bombs there. That's way different than tunnels. Used by Hamas. Not Gaza citizens.
HAMAS is not Gaza citizens???? :-)))))
What you even babbling, idiot??? :-))))
Qtard: If you'd be able to prove it in court...
That I decided for myself that I felt threatened? HOW could it be disproved? Time travelling mind reading?
Qtard: Yap. Only non-humans are non-humans. As that nasty "J6 insurrectioinists", yes? ;-P
No. Only humans can be citizens of a government. Animals aren't citizens. Animals can not engage in insurrection.
Qtard: because they non-humans?\\That is what you think? Because I never said that. Said they absolutely are humans.\\But... have not, do not deserve to have? Human Rights.
Do deserve.
Qtard: Even though it is immanents -- being human, having rights.
I dunno what "immanents" means. Google says "Did you mean: immanence?".
Qtard: But Nazi-Derpy thinks it have a RIGHT to deny OTHER people Human Rights... on it's whim... like that Nazis thought.
Whim? No. Based on Locke's requirement that there be a "long train of abuses" first.
Qtard: You have not lost horns. So you still have horns.
Never had "horns" (sore loser "right" to overturn the results of a fair election sore losers lost).
Qtard: \\Jewish people weren't vandalizing government buildings or threatening the lives of lawmakers.\\So what?
So they suffered a long train of abuses. As opposed to committing the abuses.
Qtard: It was their right to DECIDE that they need to ask some questions... of that lawmakers directly.
Threatening violence isn't "asking questions". "Hang Mike Pence" wasn't a question.
Qtard: And that is not only their Human Right, that is THEIR UNDENYABLE RIGHT as eligible voters.
Is that what their lawyers argued in court? Any of them?
Qtard: But that lawmakers runned away, instead of ansevering.
Instead of getting killed.
Qtard: Which made em rightfully pissed.
Qtard thinks J6 insurrectionists were "rightfully pissed" because lawmakers didn't want to be murdered?
Qtard: And pissed people, not behave very peaceful and rational... that's in human nature too.
Oh. So it was the lawmaker's fault. For running away instead of being murdered.
Qtard: ONLY difference that in case of Fathers Founders it was success story...
Who are "Fathers Founders"? I have never heard of them. American revolutionaries suffered a long train of abuses. J6 sore losers did not.
Qtard: ...and they, as winners, teached to glorify their deeds.
Knew they were in the right. Because they had suffered a long train of abuses.
Qtard: You think I am one of your alter-egos?
F*ck no.
Qtard: Well, quite could be.
Could not.
Qtard: It seems that there is such a noisy chorus there... inside your scull, that you freakingly cannot distinguish with whom you talking.
You are the one imagining all these "alter egos". They only exist in your "scull", not mine. I don't even have a "scull". I have a skull.
Qtard: Why you CANNOT quote EVEN ONE???\\I can. Like... "I *do* deny em their rights". Quoted many times.\\Yep. Faked.
Faked by YOU.
Qtard: As I ALWAYS give CORRECT ref "I *DO* deny...". And that other part "em their rights" is just MY summary or your other words.
False summary.
Qtard: \\...gave link about elections??? In 2005 right?\\And not since. Thanky for admitting you lied.\\Well... theyu chose their fate that time.
HOW?? If they were not born in 2005?
Qtard: And who are you to DICTATE what VOTING LAWS must be in their country? What if their laws say that elections once in nlifetime is just enough?
Lie. That's not what their voting laws say. They cancelled them.
Qtard: //Quote lies from me that you didn't point to? How can I quote things you didn't say? About lies I didn't tell?//So... you still ABLE to see such logical misses in texts... But not in your own words.
I don't see any. Can you quote them?
Qtard: Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then???\\Can be. Have been.\\THEN. You MUST be able to do that EVERY TIME.
I don't.
Qtard: But... you DO NOT DO that.
Why should I?
Only spawning false claims like this one -- that you did it sometime/somewhere... WITHOUT COIRRECT REFFERING to when and where. Which is tactics of liars.
Your tactic (as a liar) is obviously to ask for quotes over and over and over. Say I never gave any even though I have. Many times.
Qtard: Congrats, De-Ru-Pun. ;-P You are liar.
Self encouragement.
Qtard: Thought I would not see through such a miserly trick?
Your trick. And, yes, I see through it.
Qtard: \\Opposition research? Those are different things.\\Yap. Just give it another name (euphemism) and it'll re-tool crime in non-crime.\\What crime?\\Thanky-thanky for confirmation.
That there is no crime? You're welcome.
Qtard: Why they called secret? Why they called security? Services.\\So enemies don't find out.\\Yap. And enemies could/should be feeded with lies too.
Yes. Qtard thinks enemies should be told the truth?
Qtard cited (what it called) "minced meats". That was about lying to the enemy. I was under the impression Qtard thought that was a good idea. No?
Qtard: But whom government treating as enemies, too?
Enemies.
Qtard: But... there is WHOLE PILE of reasons for them to lie, or to conseal truth...\\Which are?? Tell me one. Of the "pile".\\Ehm... like, to be elected yet one time?
Huh? USA doesn't elect intelligence agents. They are hired.
Qtard: And derive "truthfulness" from friend or foe told that.\\Sounds like your reasoning.\\Of course. Good deminstration. You treating my like a foe... and treating my words accordingly. Like by doubting me being foreigner.
So... You're admitting you aren't?
Qtard: \\Said it believed Israel but not American intelligence.\\Because. Israel provided HARD evidances -- videos.
So, American intelligence should have provided "hard evidences", like undercover agent behind enemy lines who told them... Who would then be killed? Or whatever method they used, which could then be counted by our enemies?
Qtard: And there is SEPARATE confirmation -- from their enemies, that they did it. I have seen nothing like that from USA spys... in ages.
So, after 9/11 the USA government would not say how many people died in the attacks? And al Qaeda denied responsibility? That isn't what I remember happening.
Qtard: \\You babbled about underground cities. Said all Gaza citizens were safe from bombs there. That's way different than tunnels. Used by Hamas. Not Gaza citizens.
Qtard: HAMAS is not Gaza citizens????
All of them? No. Only a small percentage. They don't allow Gazans who are not Hamas into the tunnels. Because (one reason) they want innocent Palestinians to die. So they can blame Israel. Also, not enough room for 2 million people in those tunnels. Also, they can collapse. Just heard about that happening in the news.
\\Qtard: If you'd be able to prove it in court...
\\That I decided for myself that I felt threatened? HOW could it be disproved? Time travelling mind reading?
Yap.
You are I-D-I-O-T.
Who dunno what peer court are.
\\Do deserve.
But you deny em it, yes? ;-P
\\Qtard: Even though it is immanents -- being human, having rights.
\\I dunno what "immanents" means. Google says "Did you mean: immanence?".
IMMANENT | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
dictionary.cambridge.org › dictionary › imman...
immanent definition: 1. present as a natural and permanent part of something: 2. present as a natural and permanent…. Learn more.
\\Qtard: But Nazi-Derpy thinks it have a RIGHT to deny OTHER people Human Rights... on it's whim... like that Nazis thought.
\\Whim? No. Based on Locke's requirement that there be a "long train of abuses" first.
Aha... Religious Bigotry. Like "Jesus said..."
But that is "Locke said..." to this religious bonker. :-)))))
\\Qtard: You have not lost horns. So you still have horns.
\\Never had "horns" (sore loser "right" to overturn the results of a fair election sore losers lost).
Having IMMANENT Human Right to DECIDE for themself... but Derpy the Heinous Religious Bigot DENY em having that rights... on the base on some "Locke said it...".
Even though that "Locke said it..." EARLIER, was used to overthrow Holy Rule of a King of England. And to establish USA.
Which mean Derpy is not just any religious bigot, but religious fanatic and heretic. ;-P
Which twisting dogmas into pretcel. To suit its minutae needs. :-))))
\\So they suffered a long train of abuses. As opposed to committing the abuses.
Participants of Tea Party was criminals?
Washington was guilty in high treason? ;-P
\\Threatening violence isn't "asking questions". "Hang Mike Pence" wasn't a question.
And what about "hang dRump"? ;-P
Oh, I know. It's different. Because "dRump is Guilty", yes??? :-)))))
\\Knew they were in the right. Because they had suffered a long train of abuses.
Yap.
Brainwasged their followers into believing that. ;-P
\\Qtard: You think I am one of your alter-egos?
\\F*ck no.
First good thing said by you in ages.
But... not for long.
\\You are the one imagining all these "alter egos". They only exist in your "scull", not mine. I don't even have a "scull". I have a skull.
What else could I think of?
When you first saying something. Then crying "I NEVER said it".
What ELSE explanation there could be?
Instead of you having split personality disorder -- so when this or that written from Dervish Sanders here -- it's all different alter-ego doing.
That's why other alter-egos do not recognize it as their writing.
All in accordance with visible to anybody facts. ;-P
\\Faked by YOU.
Here we again.
So what???
It's me who are writing that bullshit under nick Dervish Sanders? ;-P
\\False summary.
Based on FACTS and LOGIC.
You was notmable to disprove.
Becase you are miserly idiot.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: \\...gave link about elections??? In 2005 right?\\And not since. Thanky for admitting you lied.\\Well... theyu chose their fate that time.
\\HOW?? If they were not born in 2005?
Like that is not natural that childern is destined to go by that road paved to them by their parents...
Yawn.
\\Lie. That's not what their voting laws say. They cancelled them.
Yawn.
Because they are government.
They can do it. Like DEMNs did with changing voting rules. ;-P
\\I don't see any. Can you quote them?
Easy-Peasy.
Like when you said that you "proved" something -- but without giving FACTS and LOGIC. Just your mere words -- that's not proofs.
Or. Like when you claiming that you did something "many times". But cannot give QUOTE of ANY of that "many times".
And etc.
Pretty much each of your stupid mere babbling here. ;-P
But....
You'll still be "I don't see any" -- because you are idiot.
It's NATURAL and IMMANENT to an idiot -- to not see own idiocy. ;-P
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then???\\Can be. Have been.\\THEN. You MUST be able to do that EVERY TIME.
\\I don't.
Of course.
Because you are I-D-I-O-T. ;-P
\\Why should I?
Yap.
Why should you demonstreate that you are NOT idiot. If you are. :-))))
Really. There is NO such reason.
Bingo!
\\Your tactic (as a liar) is obviously to ask for quotes over and over and over. Say I never gave any even though I have. Many times.
Yap.
Faked ones.
Because there is NO quotes to base your moronic lying claims on. ;-P
That's why you dislike QUOTES and refering to a FACTS... SO DEMN MUCH.
Because they prohibit you to proloferete with your heinous lies. :-))))
\\Qtard: \\Opposition research? Those are different things.\\Yap. Just give it another name (euphemism) and it'll re-tool crime in non-crime.\\What crime?\\Thanky-thanky for confirmation.
\\That there is no crime? You're welcome.
Yap.
Lies and crookery... why liars and crooks would be against it? Call it crime?
Yes -- there is NO such reason. ;-P
\\Yes. Qtard thinks enemies should be told the truth?
Qtard cited (what it called) "minced meats". That was about lying to the enemy. I was under the impression Qtard thought that was a good idea. No?
You forgot?
That is YOU are one who trying to say that Secret Services -- are for Telling Truth.
NOT me. ;-P
\\Qtard: But... there is WHOLE PILE of reasons for them to lie, or to conseal truth...\\Which are?? Tell me one. Of the "pile".\\Ehm... like, to be elected yet one time?
\\Huh? USA doesn't elect intelligence agents. They are hired.
Idiot have small capacity of mind.
And unable to trace it back that that was said about government?
Yeah, of course.
Cause it's idiot.
It's NATURAL and IMMANENT... to idiots.
To have miserly brain capabilities. :-))))
\\So, American intelligence should have provided "hard evidences", like undercover agent behind enemy lines who told them... Who would then be killed? Or whatever method they used, which could then be counted by our enemies?
Well... they could stay silent. To not tell outrageous lies.
For a change.
Yawn.
\\So, after 9/11 the USA government would not say how many people died in the attacks? And al Qaeda denied responsibility? That isn't what I remember happening.
What is the reason Twins fell? Why hijacking of jumbo jets was not prevented? Who was training ben Laden? ;-P
\\Qtard: HAMAS is not Gaza citizens????
\\All of them? No. Only a small percentage.
WAT??? :-))))))
Google says "Peer Court is an alternative to Juvenile Court for many first-time offenders".
Qtard dunno what it is. Has nothing to do with mind reading.
Qtard: But you deny em it, yes?
I have no power to deny or not deny. Do know they were arrested and convicted.
Qtard: Cambridge Dictionary
immanent definition: 1. present as a natural and permanent part of something: 2. present as a natural and permanent….
Yeah, if they suffered a long train of abuses. But they didn't.
Qtard: \\Whim? No. Based on Locke's requirement that there be a "long train of abuses" first. Aha... Religious Bigotry. Like "Jesus said..."
No. Nothing like that.
Qtard: But that is "Locke said..." to this religious bonker.
Wasn't published as a religious document.
Qtard: Having IMMANENT Human Right to DECIDE for themself...
Decide not to follow laws you don't like? I never heard of this "right". Cite it.
Qtard: ...but Derpy the Heinous Religious Bigot DENY em having that rights... on the base on some "Locke said it...".
Religion has nothing to do with it.
Qtard: Even though that "Locke said it..." EARLIER, was used to overthrow Holy Rule of a King of England. And to establish USA.
Exactly.
Qtard: Which mean Derpy is not just any religious bigot, but religious fanatic and heretic.
Whaaaat? Founders cited Locke. Suffered a long train of abuses. Establishing that as the standard. So, why would that not apply to the J6 insurrectionists?
Qtard: Which twisting dogmas into pretcel. To suit its minutae needs.
Qtard doing the twisting.
Qtard: Participants of Tea Party was criminals? Washington was guilty in high treason?
The king thought so.
Qtard: And what about "hang dRump"?
Nobody is saying that.
Qtard: Oh, I know. It's different. Because "dRump is Guilty", yes???
Nobody is saying hang tRump. People are saying he should receive a fair trial.
Qtard: Brainwasged their followers into believing that.
So, the Founders didn't have right to decide for themselves?
Qtard: When you first saying something. Then crying "I NEVER said it".
Me? I never did that. You have.
Qtard: What ELSE explanation there could be?
You're talking about yourself.
Qtard: Instead of you having split personality disorder -- so when this or that written from Dervish Sanders here -- it's all different alter-ego doing.
No. It's me. Unless it's Mystere faking comments from me.
Qtard: That's why other alter-egos do not recognize it as their writing.
I recognize it as your writing "what Derpy really mean".
Qtard: \\Faked by YOU\\Here we again. So what??? It's me who are writing that bullshit under nick Dervish Sanders?
No. You were writing it under "Q". Now you aren't writing your BS under any nick.
Qtard: \\False summary. Based on FACTS and LOGIC. You was notmable to disprove.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Like that is not natural that childern is destined to go by that road paved to them by their parents...
Maybe. Maybe not. No way of knowing without voting.
Qtard: \\They can do it.
Can. But then they no longer have the "consent of the governed".
Qtard: Like DEMNs did with changing voting rules.
More voting is like less voting? Maybe to an idiot.
Qtard: Like when you said that you "proved" something -- but without giving FACTS and LOGIC. Just your mere words -- that's not proofs.
Of course not. Why I would (and have not) ever done that.
Qtard: Or. Like when you claiming that you did something "many times". But cannot give QUOTE of ANY of that "many times".
Because I got sick of your lies. That is your dishonest strategy -- to say I never provided any evidence -- keep asking for it over and over.
Qtard: You'll still be "I don't see any" -- because you are idiot.
No. Because you are a liar. You didn't give any quotes.
Qtard: It's NATURAL and IMMANENT to an idiot -- to not see own idiocy.
That explains you.
Qtard: Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then???\\Can be. Have been.\\THEN. You MUST be able to do that EVERY TIME\\ I don't.\\ Of course.\\Because you are I-D-I-O-T.
No. It's because I am sick of your moronic games.
Qtard: \\Your tactic (as a liar) is obviously to ask for quotes over and over and over. Say I never gave any even though I have. Many times\\Yap. Faked ones.
Talking to your alter ego?
Qtard: Lies and crookery... why liars and crooks would be against it? Call it crime?
What "lies and crookery"? Qtard dunno what it is talking about.
Qtard: That is YOU are one who trying to say that Secret Services -- are for Telling Truth.
No. I never said they are "for" that. I said I generally tend to believe if there is no reason for them not to be honest. I asked you what that reason might be (re the number of people who died when a bomb fell near a hospital) -- and you could not give one.
Qtard: NOT me.
Of course not. Because (as someone who lies all the time) you assume everyone else lies all the time.
Qtard: And unable to trace it back that that was said about government? Yeah, of course.
I dunno what you are talking about. Trace what back?
Qtard: Well... they could stay silent. To not tell outrageous lies.
100-300 people dying is not an "outrageous lies". Sounds like a reasonable estimate to me. Also intelligence there is no reason for them to lie about.
Qtard: What is the reason Twins fell? Why hijacking of jumbo jets was not prevented?
gwb.
Qtard: Who was training ben Laden?
I never even heard of this "Ben Laden". Or what you think Ben was trained to do.
Qtard: HAMAS is not Gaza citizens?\\All of them? No. Only a small percentage.\\WAT???
Only a small percentage. Why are you asking me again when I just answered your question?
More voting is like less voting? Maybe to an idiot.
The Left is hilarious. "More illegal/fraudulent voting is better than less!"
...you all have the same approach to immigration.
In other words, you're "stuck on stupid"!
Meden agan!
The Left strongly opposes illegal/fraudulent voting.
The right strongly supports stopping legal votes by calling them illegal/fraudulent.
\\I have no power to deny or not deny. Do know they were arrested and convicted.
But you have said "I *DO* deny..."!!!
Or that was just one of your numerous alter-egos you (current you) have NO responsibility for a words of??? :-))))
\\Yeah, if they suffered a long train of abuses. But they didn't.
That's immanent to THEM... not to you.
\\Qtard: \\Whim? No. Based on Locke's requirement that there be a "long train of abuses" first. Aha... Religious Bigotry. Like "Jesus said..."
\\No. Nothing like that.
And you can EXPLAIN the difference?
Naaah.
Of course you not. :-)))))
Yopu just a religious bigot. So, of course, as Jesus is not person of your cult -- you deem it as unproper to refer to him... and see it as enough difference.
Am I right?
But question was in GENERAL PRINCIPLE. Not in particulars. ;-P
\\Wasn't published as a religious document.
And what's the difference? ;-P
Maybe there somewhere in bible written that that is "religious document"? :-))))
\\Qtard: Having IMMANENT Human Right to DECIDE for themself...
\\Decide not to follow laws you don't like? I never heard of this "right". Cite it.
You just confirmed that you dunno what "immanence" is. ;-P
And that you are total idiot. :-))))
\\Qtard: ...but Derpy the Heinous Religious Bigot DENY em having that rights... on the base on some "Locke said it...".
\\Religion has nothing to do with it.
Just what religious bigot would say... ;-P
\\Qtard: Even though that "Locke said it..." EARLIER, was used to overthrow Holy Rule of a King of England. And to establish USA.
\\Exactly.
Yawn.
You just admitted that you using "words from holy scripture" THE SAME WAY as religious bonkers do.
Like using words of love to a neighbour... to justify killing.
\\Whaaaat? Founders cited Locke. Suffered a long train of abuses. Establishing that as the standard. So, why would that not apply to the J6 insurrectionists?
Ye-a-a-a-s? And WHERE they DID that "established as standard"?
I CITED to you EXCERPT from Declaration of Independence. About Human Rights.
Dare to CITE excerpt which proves this your religious bonker and heretic claim?
Of course not. Because as fanatic, you do not need ANY BASE for your feverish claims.
Only hot blazing passion. ;-P
And you will prove it, in a jiffy.
\\Qtard: Which twisting dogmas into pretcel. To suit its minutae needs.
\\Qtard doing the twisting.
Oh... so that was your alter-ego "Qtard" said it? "I *DO* deny...". :-))))
\\Qtard: Participants of Tea Party was criminals? Washington was guilty in high treason?
\\The king thought so.
Yap.
Same as DEMNs today. ;-P
Infrigment of their "divine" rights.
Self-subscribed.
\\Qtard: And what about "hang dRump"?
\\Nobody is saying that.
Yeah.
I get it.
That you other alter-ego -- Nobody. Such a dRump-Hater. ;-P
\\So, the Founders didn't have right to decide for themselves?
Dunno. You say.
\\Qtard: When you first saying something. Then crying "I NEVER said it".
\\Me? I never did that. You have.
And to which of your alter-egos... that have written that "I NEVER said it" many times you saying it?
Please. Pretty Please. Use names. So I could distinguish. I between em.
I uinderstand that fot you... for all of you, that is not needed.
But to me, that would give an invaluable hint. ;-P
\\Qtard: Instead of you having split personality disorder -- so when this or that written from Dervish Sanders here -- it's all different alter-ego doing.
\\No. It's me. Unless it's Mystere faking comments from me.
Aha. :-))))
\\Qtard: That's why other alter-egos do not recognize it as their writing.
\\I recognize it as your writing "what Derpy really mean".
Yeah... and which of your that nasty alter-egos dared to writ that words -- "what Derpy really mean"? ;-P
Or... that is reference to yet one alter-ego? :-))))
\\No. You were writing it under "Q". Now you aren't writing your BS under any nick.
Well. You are always free to give QUOTES.
Of where *I* have written it under "Q" or as anon... something you deem as BS. ;-P
But. Somehow. You never able to. :-))))
\\Qtard: \\False summary. Based on FACTS and LOGIC. You was notmable to disprove.
\\:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Histerical reaction to the Truth.
Like when I cited FACTS: that Trump not in jail, or Sun rising in the morning -- you was not able to disprove, obviously, because it's impossible.
Even for such a heinous liar. ;-P
\\Can. But then they no longer have the "consent of the governed".
And Bi-den have?
\\More voting is like less voting? Maybe to an idiot.
No. Changing rules on the whim.
DEMNs did it -- but DEMNs are O.K.
HAMAS did it -- but HAMAS is NOT O.K.???
That simple?
\\Qtard: Like when you said that you "proved" something -- but without giving FACTS and LOGIC. Just your mere words -- that's not proofs.
\\Of course not. Why I would (and have not) ever done that.
:-)))))))
And what that should mean? :-))))
\\Qtard: Or. Like when you claiming that you did something "many times". But cannot give QUOTE of ANY of that "many times".
\\Because I got sick of your lies.
Like "lies" that: dRump is not in jail, Sun rising in the mornning and you continue saying all kinds of BS? ;-P
Yep.
Now it confirms that you caling FACTS -- "lies". ;-P
\\That is your dishonest strategy -- to say I never provided any evidence -- keep asking for it over and over.
Well... HOW it is dishonest???
*I*... do it all of the times. Giving QUOTES.
Well... you dislike that my truthful QUOTES of you words -- ones which can be checked and double-checked, and trully are nothing else but copy-pasted excerpts of YOUR OWN WORDS... which revealing your lies.
Surrely, it is firm reason to dislike... to a fool. And liar. ;-P
As well as calling it "dishonest" -- trully that's what liar would say.
Heinous LIAR... which trying to call Truth it's a Lie".
And to proliferate with its "MY Lie it's Truth". :-)))))
\\Qtard: You'll still be "I don't see any" -- because you are idiot.
\\No. Because you are a liar. You didn't give any quotes.
Which of your alter-egos?
\\Qtard: It's NATURAL and IMMANENT to an idiot -- to not see own idiocy.
\\That explains you.
Oh... but *I* -- I see my "idiocy" -- like for example that idiotic fit that I wasted so much time trying to talk with such an idiot as you are.
See... I *see* my idiocy. ;-P
That's impossible to be smart -- and do not see own foolishness.
Because that is only way to became smarter. ;-P
But... you, as an idiot. Will never grokE it. :-))))
\\Qtard: Why that "honest words" CANNOT be confirmed with FACTS then???\\Can be. Have been.\\THEN. You MUST be able to do that EVERY TIME\\ I don't.\\ Of course.\\Because you are I-D-I-O-T.
\\No. It's because I am sick of your moronic games.
:-))))))))
Yap.
Talking with FACTS and LOGIC.
It's "moronic games"... to an idiot. :-)))))
Because morons cannot keep up with such things. Naturally.
\\Qtard: \\Your tactic (as a liar) is obviously to ask for quotes over and over and over. Say I never gave any even though I have. Many times\\Yap. Faked ones.
\\Talking to your alter ego?
Ah??? Which one?
Which alter-ego did write that words "Your tactic (as a liar)". Under your nickname.
Name.
Please, give me a name. ;-P
\\Qtard: Lies and crookery... why liars and crooks would be against it? Call it crime?
\\What "lies and crookery"? Qtard dunno what it is talking about.
Your alter-ego? ;-P
\\Qtard: That is YOU are one who trying to say that Secret Services -- are for Telling Truth.
\\No. I never said they are "for" that. I said I generally tend to believe if there is no reason for them not to be honest.
There is NO reason for them to be honest. ;-P
What for?
\\I asked you what that reason might be (re the number of people who died when a bomb fell near a hospital) -- and you could not give one.
Pft!
:-)))))))
YOU gave em THE REASON -- to not reveal their methods and agents.
But still, you moronicly trying to claim that you do not see a reason to not believe em. :-))))))
\\Of course not. Because (as someone who lies all the time) you assume everyone else lies all the time.
Yeah. "Lies" of which you cannot provide EVEN ONE quote. Reliably.
:-)))))))))
You being that liar is DEMN obvious... as ever. :-)))))
\\Qtard: And unable to trace it back that that was said about government? Yeah, of course.
\\I dunno what you are talking about. Trace what back?
Playing fool. :-)))))
To cover idiotic lies.
Made up to cover idiotic foolishness.
To be pretended(?) to cover for previous lies.
Ethernal lifecycle. Of this little verbal feces piglet -- Derpy the Idiot.
\\100-300 people dying is not an "outrageous lies". Sounds like a reasonable estimate to me. Also intelligence there is no reason for them to lie about.
That's is... "reasonable estimate".
From those who MUST BE able to provide stone carved FACTS.
\\Qtard: What is the reason Twins fell? Why hijacking of jumbo jets was not prevented?
\\gwb.
Yap.
"It's all Reps fault!"
Even though it happened ON THE FIRST YEAR of cadence of Rep prezident.
After 8 years of DEMNs.
And IN SAME TIME... "it's all Reps fault!" to what Zero-bama did, with placating liliPut's war against Georgia.
Double Standards? That is always someone else's fault? Naaah, NEVER heard of it... CAUSE -- DEMN honesty -- when we know we are guilty as hell, we say we don't remember or that is not out fault(tm) anyway.
:-))))))))))
And you even dare to say that that J6 NOT feeled "long train of abuses".
While I here ONLY FOR a YEAR. And that is ONLY ONE you DEMN here... and I already start feeling it.
And they, that "J6 insurrectionists"... living up closer, and surrounded by such a filth.
\\I never even heard of this "Ben Laden". Or what you think Ben was trained to do.
Yap.
Like this.
Perfect example of DEMNSpeak.
Derpy's silent agreement. AGAIN!
No.
With NewSpeak "Yes".
Yawn.
As ever.
No. NOT NewSpeak Yes. I don't use NewSpeak. Never have. Never will.
Oh. Like NewSpeak user would say any Truth straight.
Not in NewSpeak. ;-P
Said to yourself. As a NewSpeaker.
Sorry... for misinterpriting your mumbling to yourself.
But NO, you said that I was right. ;-P
Didn't. Why would I?
Post a Comment