You're anti-anti-racist. aka pro-racist. Definitely not neutral. What's the point of this post? Whining about people standing up to White Supremacy? Who's neutral? Ignorant Whites?
As per www.census.gov... White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report responses such as German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, and Egyptian. The category also includes groups such as Polish, French, Iranian, Slavic, Cajun, Chaldean, etc.
Discrimination on the base of place of living? :-)))))
Is that your favorite substitute euphemism for open racism, Derpy?
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said... As per www.census.gov... White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report responses such as German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, and Egyptian.
So... bronze tanned Egyptian -- is White.
And sun-avert Chinese... still not? :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Because racist and totalitarian wannabe Derpy do not like it -- to share being White with that nasty "yellowish" asians? ;-P
Qtard: Discrimination on the base of place of living? Is that your favorite substitute euphemism for open racism, Derpy?
We were talking about your moronic assertion that Chinese people are White Supremacists. I said NOTHING about discriminating based on "place of living". Or ethnicity.
Qtard: So... bronze tanned Egyptian -- is White. And sun-avert Chinese... still not?
Talk to the people at the census bureau, idiot. I am not a census bureau employee.
Qtard: Because racist and totalitarian wannabe Derpy do not like it -- to share being White with that nasty "yellowish" asians?
I never said Asian people have yellow skin. YOU did. Chinese people aren't Simpsons characters. Yellow isn't a skin color any human has. Unless they have jaundice.
\\We were talking about your moronic assertion that Chinese people are White Supremacists.
So... they not white? Chinese? ;-P
Go. Say it. Reveal your racistic nature. Derpy. :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\ I said NOTHING about discriminating based on "place of living". Or ethnicity.
YOUR WORDS (you habitually trying to ignore and dismiss) ;-P
Blogger Dervish Sanders said... Because they aren't European, they're Asian.
July 13, 2023 at 2:51 PM
Anonymous Dervish Sanders said... As per www.census.gov... White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report responses such as German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, and Egyptian. The category also includes groups such as Polish, French, Iranian, Slavic, Cajun, Chaldean, etc.
July 13, 2023 at 4:44 PM
Isn't they mean that you trying to DENY Chinese being White -- of which ANYBODY can make own judgment -- just by looking at mr. Xi's face... and it's WHITE!!!!
Which shows your inclination to the most ancient and preposterouis form of trogloditic racism. ;-P
\\Talk to the people at the census bureau, idiot. I am not a census bureau employee.
Why do you use their words, idiot? If you do not undertand what they mean, idiot? ;-P
\\I never said Asian people have yellow skin. YOU did.
No, deepshit. :-)))))
I ASKED you -- WHY you do not call white Chinese WHITE???!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))
Qtard: So... they not white? Chinese? Go. Say it. Reveal your racistic nature.
I already said Chinese people are Asian. My acknowledgement of this fact has nothing to do with racism. Is the US Census Bureau a racist government agency? They only hire racists? If Qtard was a US citizen he could probably get a job there.
Qtard: Isn't they mean that you trying to DENY Chinese being White...
I'm not. Why would I? I don't need to deny qtarded non-facts. Facts just are. Same for non-facts. Like Chinese being White.
Qtard: ...which ANYBODY can make own judgment -- just by looking at mr. Xi's face... and it's WHITE!!!!
Xi Jinping's skin is not white. Very few people have anything close to white skin. Albinos. Otherwise people of European descent and Asian descent generally have similar skintones. But we were talking about Race, not skin color.
Qtard: Which shows your inclination to the most ancient and preposterouis form of trogloditic racism.
What is preposterous is Qtard's moronic assertions that Asian people don't exist. According to Qtard, I (as a White person of European descent) could go to China and pass for Chinese. Given that (according to Qtard) me and a Chinese person are both White.
In any case, HOW could I possibly be racist toward a Chinese person, if there is no way to tell if a person is Chinese? Chinese people (as per Qtard) are White, so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person? Because, if a Chinese person were standing if front of me, I'd just see a fellow White person.
Note that I have never said "Whites are superior to other races". Because that is stupid. The comment above is Mystere pretending to be me. And expressing HIS belief that "Whites are superior to other races".
Qtard WHY you DENY their Natural Right to be white??? And suprime.
I assume you mean "supreme". White is supreme is what you're saying? Yes? How is that NOT racist?? If White is supreme then darker skin must be inferior. As per qtarded "logic". I say it's proof Qtard is a racist.
btw, how is being White a "natural right"? Proof that Qtard has no idea what natural rights are. As proven in previous discussions about the J6 insurrectionists.
Derpy's Escape. YET ONE time. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Xi Jinping's skin is not white. Very few people have anything close to white skin. Albinos. Otherwise people of European descent and Asian descent generally have similar skintones.
To understand China you need to understand whiteness, yet it's ... www.abc.net.au › news › race-and-whiteness-k... 15 жовт. 2022 р. · If whiteness is power, Xi Jinping is its champion. The continuation of white power, in darker skin. Stan Grant is the ABC's international ...
\\But we were talking about Race, not skin color.
Defining "race" by skintone... especially one historically debunked and throwen out (like segregation into White, Black, Red and Yellow) -- that is what RACISM(tm) is about.
In our 21st century especially.
There is broad consensus across the biological and social sciences that race is a social construct, not an accurate representation of human genetic variation. Humans are remarkably genetically similar, sharing approximately 99.9% of their genetic code with one another.
Race and genetics - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Race_and_genetics
\\What is preposterous is Qtard's moronic assertions that Asian people don't exist. According to Qtard, I (as a White person of European descent) could go to China and pass for Chinese. Given that (according to Qtard) me and a Chinese person are both White.
Ditto.
You are racist. Derpy.
This your reaction is a genuine racistic outrage "what???!!!! you comparing me with THAT... (insert your favourate racistic slurr here)"
\\In any case, HOW could I possibly be racist toward a Chinese person, if there is no way to tell if a person is Chinese?
Yet one genuinely racistic reaction. ;-P
\\Chinese people (as per Qtard) are White, so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person? Because, if a Chinese person were standing if front of me, I'd just see a fellow White person.
Yap, Derpy, yap. ;-P
Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Note that I have never said "Whites are superior to other races". Because that is stupid.
With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? ;-P
But... I'm sure. You are not.
You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\I assume you mean "supreme". White is supreme is what you're saying? Yes? How is that NOT racist?? If White is supreme then darker skin must be inferior. As per qtarded "logic". I say it's proof Qtard is a racist.
Aha. :-))))))))))))))))))))
Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists.
Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin? ;-P
Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists???
Because racist Derpy do not want top see em as his equal???
See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"
Qtard: To understand China you need to understand whiteness, yet it's ... If whiteness is power, Xi Jinping is its champion. The continuation of white power, in darker skin. Stan Grant is the ABC's international...
Stan Grant: "China, like so many other non-white nations, has felt the sting of white imperialism". (excerpt from the article you cite).
Qtard: There is broad consensus across the biological and social sciences that race is a social construct, not an accurate representation of human genetic variation. Humans are remarkably genetically similar, sharing approximately 99.9% of their genetic code with one another.
*I* cited TO YOU the fact that race is a social construct -- the last time we had this idiotic discussion.
Qtard: You are racist. Derpy. This your reaction is a genuine racistic outrage "what???!!!! you comparing me with THAT... (insert your favourate racistic slurr here)".
FAKE quote. Or "summary" of my words. That is NOT my reaction. What outrage? I don't have a "favorite" racist slur, asshole.
Qtard: \\In any case, HOW could I possibly be racist toward a Chinese person, if there is no way to tell if a person is Chinese?\\Yet one genuinely racistic reaction.
Bullshit. If a Chinese person's race is White, how can I tell if they are Chinese?
Qtard: Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch.
You truly are an idiot.
Qtard: With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? But... I'm sure. You are not.
Of course not. There was no "white supremacist raving" of mine for me to dismiss.
Qtard: You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.
No. Because I never wrote any such words.
Qtard: Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists. Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin?
No. I think those people are idiots. And that they are inferior.
Qtard: Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists???
I don't care. White Supremacists (White idiots who see themselves as superior) will disagree though. But I don't know who you're talking about. Give me some quotes from Chinese people who say they are "white supremacists". There might be some. They are idiots too.
Qtard: Because racist Derpy do not want top see em as his equal???
There is no such person as "racist Derpy". *I* reject racism. Racists (people like you) are STUPID.
Qtard: See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"
Your answer is....???
Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.
You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.
Qtard: \\Proof that Qtard has no idea what natural rights are. As proven in previous discussions about the J6 insurrectionists.\\ Proof? Proved? With WHAT facts??? With WHAT logic???
Proved by Qtard's assertion that overthrowing democracy is a "natural right".
Idiot Qtard just keeps demonstrating it's mental disability -- inability to understand even definition of what a FACT is.
\\Stan Grant: "China, like so many other non-white nations, has felt the sting of white imperialism". (excerpt from the article you cite).
Yap. Grant-racist babbling the same as Derpy-racist. ;-P
Or what? You will not admit him being White as you, too???
Because he is nasty aussy??? With different, not noble skintone as you??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\*I* cited TO YOU the fact that race is a social construct -- the last time we had this idiotic discussion.
So??? On what base you dening Chinese being whitish and suprimish, ah, Derpy?
On that racistic base -- that YOU do not agree with it, alone??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\FAKE quote. Or "summary" of my words. That is NOT my reaction. What outrage? I don't have a "favorite" racist slur, asshole.
You.
Do Not.
Want.
To be compared with "those non-white" Chinese. ;-P
Obviously.
Or... you can try to explain and elaborate -- why your opaque claim means something else...
But, naah...
You can't do that.
Have no brains. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Bullshit. If a Chinese person's race is White, how can I tell if they are Chinese?
You.
Above.
Tryed to claim that "race its social construct" its YOUR WORDS.
But.
With this glaring bullshit... just confirmed that you have ZILCH understanding what that phrase "race its social construct" even mean. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch.
\\You truly are an idiot.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Ve-e-e-eRY damning. From a cocroach. ;-P
\\Qtard: With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? But... I'm sure. You are not.
\\Of course not.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And... what did I say.
My prediction of your reactions -- is flawless. ;-P
\\Qtard: You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.
\\No. Because I never wrote any such words.
Oh, yes. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
Just more lies and denial, from heinous liar and hypocrite. ;-P
\\Qtard: Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists???
\\I don't care. White Supremacists (White idiots who see themselves as superior) will disagree though.
Self-contradicting.
Why you use that capitalized "White Supremacists" and running after people accusing em being W.S.s??? If you'd "don't care"??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))0
But well, just another obvious lie and denyal from heinouis liar and hypocrite. AGAIN.
Nothing new. And *consistent* with all previous observations.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists. Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin?
\\No. I think those people are idiots. And that they are inferior.
Yap.
YOU said it. ;-P
But... as proven heinouis liar and hypocrite... you will try to deny it. Just in the next comment. ;-P
\\Give me some quotes from Chinese people who say they are "white supremacists".
Do that people you try to smear being "White Supremacists" call themself W.S.s???
Rethorical question.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Because racist Derpy do not want top see em as his equal???
\\There is no such person as "racist Derpy". *I* reject racism. Racists (people like you) are STUPID.
Yap.
The same as you rejected people their Natural and their Human Rights.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"
\\Your answer is....???
I already gave it -- excerpt from Wikipedia. ;-P
But you... have no brains to understand it.
Even though you tryed to claim that you said it first. :-))))
\\Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.
\\You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.
Yet one idiotic "rebuff".
Yawn.
\\Proved by Qtard's assertion that overthrowing democracy is a "natural right".
Aha...
Only. There is NO. Not posible to "overthrone democracy". Because Democracy mean -- that there is NO THRONE... no kings or tyrants.
And as such -- it's impossible to over-THRONE something that is NOT exist.
And people's autonomy to decide for themself -- that is natural fact of this Reality.
EVEN SLAVES can uprise against injustice. Because not matter what thier masters would like to think -- they HAVE their autonomy, andcan decide for themself.
But... heinous liar and hyupocrite, totalitarian wannabe, racistic and white-supremacistic ;-P Derpy... do not like it, yes???
Because it sees itself as Master??? ;-P
\\Idiot Qtard just keeps demonstrating it's mental disability -- inability to understand even definition of what a FACT is.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue.
You can even copy-paste WHOLE my comment, as response to my comment.
To confirm how enormously BIG idiot U R!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: So??? On what base you dening Chinese being whitish and suprimish, ah, Derpy? On that racistic base -- that YOU do not agree with it, alone???
I acknowledge the social construct of race exists. A point-to-reality fact. And that, under this construct, Chinese people are Asian. Whereas Qtard denies this point-to-reality fact. In order to falsely paint me as a racist. When it is Qtard who is the racist. He once referred to himself as "ziz nigga", then insisted "nigga" has nothing to do with race.
Qtard: You. Do Not. Want. To be compared with "those non-white" Chinese. Obviously.
I wouldn't want to be compared to Qtard, an obvious idiot. And racist.
Qtard: Or... you can try to explain and elaborate -- why your opaque claim means something else... But, naah... You can't do that.
I can. Race is based on skin color and other features. A Chinese person can be identified as Asian despite having light skin. Qtard denies this? If Qtard was shown a picture of a "White person" and asked, "is this person Chinese?", Qtard would say "there is no way of knowing based only on appearance"?
Qtard: Have no brains. :-))))))))))))))))))))
I agree. Qtard is definitely lacking when it comes to brains.
Qtard: //If a Chinese person's race is White, how can I tell if they are Chinese?// You. Above. Tryed to claim that "race its social construct" its YOUR WORDS. But. With this glaring bullshit... just confirmed that you have ZILCH understanding what that phrase "race its social construct" even mean.
So, if it is impossible to tell (based on appearance) if a person is Chinese, HOW can any Chinese person be discriminated against by a White/European person?? It (according to your illogic) would be IMPOSSIBLE.
Qtard: Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch. \\You truly are an idiot.\\Ve-e-e-eRY damning. From a cocroach.
Whatever, dipshit. I don't give a crap. Given that there is no such thing as a "cocroach". I also don't care if I am a "uurb" or a "junky-doodle" either. Being called qtarded made up notions does not concern me at all.
Qtard: With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? But... I'm sure. You are not.\\Of course not.\\And... what did I say. My prediction of your reactions -- is flawless.
So Qtard predicted I would refute Qtard lies. Big deal.
Qtard: You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.\\No. Because I never wrote any such words.\\Oh, yes.\\Just more lies and denial, from heinous liar and hypocrite.
Yes. I will ALWAYS deny Qtard's heinous lies.
Qtard: Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists??? \\I don't care. White Supremacists (White idiots who see themselves as superior) will disagree though.\\Self-contradicting.
No.
Qtard: Why you use that capitalized "White Supremacists" and running after people accusing em being W.S.s??? If you'd "don't care"??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))
Because White Supremacists are racists. I OPPOSE racism. Qtard, as a White Supremacist is obviously offended. But, again, I do not care.
Qtard: But well, just another obvious lie and denyal from heinouis liar and hypocrite. AGAIN. Nothing new. And *consistent* with all previous observations. Yawn.
I continue to deny Qtard's heinous lies. And object to his hypocrisy. Nothing new, indeed.
Qtard: Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists. Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin?\\No. I think those people are idiots. And that they are inferior.\\Yap. YOU said it.
I did. And Qtard, as a White Supremacist, is offended. But I don't give a shit.
Qtard: But... as proven heinouis liar and hypocrite... you will try to deny it. Just in the next comment.
Why would I deny that White Supremacists (like you) are idiots? This is a FACT. I don't deny facts, Qtard does.
Qtard: \\Give me some quotes from Chinese people who say they are "white supremacists".\\Do that people you try to smear being "White Supremacists" call themself W.S.s??? Rethorical question. Yawn.
"Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists?"... Qtard's words. Now you say (what they WANT to call themselves, according to you) is a "smear"???
Qtard: The same as you rejected people their Natural and their Human Rights. Yawn.
I DEMAND support for human rights.
Qtard: See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"\\Your answer is....??? I already gave it -- excerpt from Wikipedia. But you... have no brains to understand it.
Qtard has no brains to understand HOW to tell the difference between a Chinese/Asian person and a European/White person. Though I suspect he CAN tell the difference. He only PRETENDS to not be able to. Because this pretending serves his idiotic smearing of me as racist. When it is Qtard who is the racist.
In the present racists will pretend to be anti-racist. Or "neutral" (what the racist Minus FJ pretends to be).
Qtard: Even though you tryed to claim that you said it first.
Because I did. On 5/27/2023 I wrote, "Races don't exist? As a social construct they do".
You replied, "As a "social construct" for segragation and oppression. As in KKK".
[1] 5/27/2023 is BEFORE 7/17/2023 (when you cited Wikipedia).
[2] You DENIED the existence of the social construct of race. You put "social construct" in quotes and said it was an idea only held by segregationists and people in KKK. NOW you quote it and LIE about me bringing it up first? Say YOU brought it up first? What a lying POS Qtard is.
Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.\\You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.\\ Yet one idiotic "rebuff".Yawn.
Agreed. Your "rebuff" is bigly idiotic.
Qtard: \\Proved by Qtard's assertion that overthrowing democracy is a "natural right".\\Aha...Only. There is NO. Not posible to "overthrone democracy". Because Democracy mean -- that there is NO THRONE... no kings or tyrants.
Does Putin call himself a king or a tyrant? Or does he call himself "president"? MANY tyrants call themselves "president" and insist their countries are "democracies". IDIOT.
Qtard: And as such -- it's impossible to over-THRONE something that is NOT exist.
Democracy exists in the United States. It CAN be overthrown. Qtard WANTS this to happen in the US. Why it makes him sad the J6 insurrection failed. Because Qtard is a bigly fan of totalitarianism.
Qtard: And people's autonomy to decide for themself -- that is natural fact of this Reality.
The People of the United States DID decide. By electing Joe Biden over the totalitarian wannabe, donald tRump.
Qtard: EVEN SLAVES can uprise against injustice. Because not matter what thier masters would like to think -- they HAVE their autonomy, andcan decide for themself.
Slavery was outlawed in the United States. Slave rebellions in the past were put down, but they were justified. UNLIKE the J6 rebellion. Which was NOT justified. Because it was an attempt to overthrow democracy. By sore losers who had the opportunity and right to vote (whether or not they actually exercised it). The J6 insurrection wasn't a slave rebellion. IDIOT.
Qtard: But... heinous liar and hyupocrite, totalitarian wannabe, racistic and white-supremacistic ;-P Derpy... do not like it, yes???
Yawn. You're referring to an IMAGINARY person. I am none of those things. I strongly support democracy and strongly oppose racism and White Supremacy.
Qtard does not like that the J6 insurrection was unsuccessful. Because it would make the totalitarian wannabe very happy to see US democracy overthrown.
Qtard: Because it sees itself as Master??? ;-P
***SARCASM BANNER***
(included for qtarded idiots who can NOT recognize sarcasm).
Sure, that's it. You nailed it.
Continue-continue. To confirm how enormously BIG idiot you are!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I just noticed that Qtard wrote "over-THRONE" instead of "overthrown". What is this Qtarded bullshit? We were discussing democracy being overthrown, not "over-throne". Of course there is no such thing as "over-throne".
\\I acknowledge the social construct of race exists. A point-to-reality fact.
Yap!
In the minds of racists.
And you are racists. Couse you admitting it. HERE. Of your free volition. ;-P
\\ Whereas Qtard denies this point-to-reality fact. In order to falsely paint me as a racist.
At this point... you either dumb racist. OR. Just and idiot (with racistic views) who do not understand what "being social construct" mean. ;-P
\\Qtard: You. Do Not. Want. To be compared with "those non-white" Chinese. Obviously.
\\I wouldn't want to be compared to Qtard, an obvious idiot. And racist.
Quite intolerant. Racistic claim, even. ;-P
\\Qtard: Or... you can try to explain and elaborate -- why your opaque claim means something else... But, naah... You can't do that.
\\I can. Race is based on skin color and other features.
No.
It's not. There is no people with Yellow, Red or even Black skin.
That all are historically throwed out prejudges.
By all... apart from followers of Racism. ;-P
And you are one. Apparently.
\\So, if it is impossible to tell (based on appearance) if a person is Chinese, HOW can any Chinese person be discriminated against by a White/European person?? It (according to your illogic) would be IMPOSSIBLE.
Yellow starts Nazis made Jews wearing... was it not enough to decide if that is Jew before you, by his "racial traits"???
\\Whatever, dipshit. I don't give a crap. Given that there is no such thing as a "cocroach". I also don't care if I am a "uurb" or a "junky-doodle" either.
Yap.
Cause you are idiot.
And that is your Natural Right to keep being idiot.
So... there is nothing damning in calling you idiot. As you are one. ;-P
That is just a correct observation and definition of what one sees.
\\\\Self-contradicting.
\\No.
Of course.
Natural Idiot would not be able to see self-contradiction point in own blurts.
It would not be idiot, if it would. ;-P
YET ONE trait. CONFIRMED!
\\I OPPOSE racism.
With denying Chinese being white? And suprime? ;-P
\\This is a FACT. I don't deny facts, Qtard does.
Self-contradiction.
Yawn.
\\I DEMAND support for human rights.
Yeah...
But not for 6Jan rioters... or Chinese... or dRump. ;-P
\\Qtard: Even though you tryed to claim that you said it first.
\\Because I did. On 5/27/2023 I wrote, "Races don't exist? As a social construct they do".
\\You replied, "As a "social construct" for segragation and oppression. As in KKK".
Yap.
You declared your creed of racist that time.
Thank you for reminding it.
I almost forgot about it. ;-P
\\[2] You DENIED the existence of the social construct of race. You put "social construct" in quotes and said it was an idea only held by segregationists and people in KKK.
Yap.
Because that is what "being social construct" mean. ;-P
People -- who have this or that prejudges or delusions.
\\Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.\\You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.\\ Yet one idiotic "rebuff".Yawn.
\\Agreed. Your "rebuff" is bigly idiotic.
Piling up idiotic "rebuffs"???
But we already know that you are idiot. For sure. Here. ;-P
\\Does Putin call himself a king or a tyrant? Or does he call himself "president"? MANY tyrants call themselves "president" and insist their countries are "democracies". IDIOT.
No need to give your signature in every paragraph. ;-P
And.
Congrats Derpy. You just admitted that NOT all who claim being democratic are democrats. ;-P
Like you are here -- totalitarian wannabe and racists, who try to call itself anti-racists and etc... :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Bigly an idiot. And idiotic hypocrite. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Etymology, origin and meaning of overthrow by etymonline www.etymonline.com › word › overthrow overthrow (v.) c. 1300, ouerthrouen, "to knock down, throw down, cast headlong," from over- + throw (v.). Figurative sense of "to cast down from power, defeat" is attested from late 14c.
Minor and essentially meaningless differences in appearance are the basis of "race". All humans are, DNA-wise, virtually identical. Why racism is so stupid. I never admitted that I subscribe to this stupidity. I reject it. I never said I didn't want to be compared to "that". I never said White is "noble". Those are Qtard's words. Hypocrite who demands "precise" quotes. Then fabricates quotes for me. Or offers false deduction "what derpy really mean".
Qtard ADMITTED his racism. Via his defense of White Supremacy. Claimed I was slandering bigots by pointing out their White Supremacy. Because White Supremacists like Qtard are not the racists, the "real racists" are anti-racists like me.
Minor and essentially meaningless differences in appearance are the basis of "race". All humans are, DNA-wise, virtually identical. Why racism is so stupid. I never admitted that I subscribe to this stupidity. I reject it. I never said I didn't want to be compared to "that". I never said White is "noble". Those are Qtard's words. Hypocrite who demands "precise" quotes. Then fabricates quotes for me. Or offers false deduction "what derpy really mean".
Qtard ADMITTED his racism. Via his defense of White Supremacy. Claimed I was slandering bigots by pointing out their White Supremacy. Because White Supremacists like Qtard are not the racists, the "real racists" are anti-racists like me.
\\Hypocrite who demands "precise" quotes. Then fabricates quotes for me. Or offers false deduction "what derpy really mean".
Well... you have all power of Ctrl-Fing -- to find precice quotes of that "nasty Qtard"... and all pwerful framwork of Logic -- to confirm your this claim.
But.
Naaaah.
You flatly and completely CAN'T... CANNOT accomplish anything like that. Even Ctrl-Fing is beyond your miserly ability.
That ios what being imbecile accounts for. ;-P
\\Qtard ADMITTED his racism.
And where's that precise quote???
Or... that "Qtard" that is some opponent from your delusions, you trying to talk against in your nightmares? That's why that words cannot be found anywhere here, and cannot be quoted? ;-P
\\Via his defense of White Supremacy.
Ough???!! So, you OPPOSING White Supremacy? Claiming that there's no such thing? And not one who just throwing left and right that baseless unintelligible accusation.
Like... why it should be shameful, to have white skin????
\\Claimed I was slandering bigots by pointing out their White Supremacy.
Calling someone "bigot" on the base of skin color... ehm, isn't that sounds like racism? ;-P
\\Because White Supremacists like Qtard are not the racists, the "real racists" are anti-racists like me.
Ctrl-F searches ONLY the page you are on. There are many pages on this blog. Ctrl-F does not search them. How am I supposed to know what quotes Qtard is going to lie about later? Why should I spend hours searching many pages to find a Qtard quote? When Qtard KNOWS what it said? What good would it do anyway? Qtard would STILL deny it. Like when Qtard claimed John Durham said "dRump collusion with Rasha FAKE". Precise quote given, yet Qtard claims he never said it. Why I said I wasn't going to play your FM games any longer.
40 comments:
You're anti-anti-racist. aka pro-racist. Definitely not neutral. What's the point of this post? Whining about people standing up to White Supremacy? Who's neutral? Ignorant Whites?
No, I'm race neutral. And I'm certainly NOT ignorant. :)
Best go check your premises. :)
White Supremacy isn't "race neutral". That is a counter-factual assertion.
So? Are Chinese are White Supremacists??? ;-P
Are Chinese are White Supremacists? No.
Are Qtard are White Supremacists? Yes.
\\Are Chinese are White Supremacists? No.
Because they are "yellow"? ;-P
Because they aren't European, they're Asian.
As per www.census.gov...
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report responses such as German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, and Egyptian. The category also includes groups such as Polish, French, Iranian, Slavic, Cajun, Chaldean, etc.
Legal vs. Common definitions again? Legal "truth"? BWAH!
\\Because they aren't European, they're Asian.
Discrimination on the base of place of living? :-)))))
Is that your favorite substitute euphemism for open racism, Derpy?
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...
As per www.census.gov...
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report responses such as German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, and Egyptian.
So... bronze tanned Egyptian -- is White.
And sun-avert Chinese... still not? :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Because racist and totalitarian wannabe Derpy do not like it -- to share being White with that nasty "yellowish" asians? ;-P
🔺Dervish Sanders tries to disguise himself by posting as "anonymous".🔺
The only one you fool is yourself, Derpi$h bin §atan-§ander$666.
🔺Race hustler Dervish Sanders thinks he can hide by posting anonymously.🔺
Whites are superior to other races.
Whites are superior to other races.
Superior in what, Dervy? Deception?
Mystere wrote that comment. I am (unlike you) not a White Supremacist.
Qtard: Discrimination on the base of place of living? Is that your favorite substitute euphemism for open racism, Derpy?
We were talking about your moronic assertion that Chinese people are White Supremacists. I said NOTHING about discriminating based on "place of living". Or ethnicity.
Qtard: So... bronze tanned Egyptian -- is White. And sun-avert Chinese... still not?
Talk to the people at the census bureau, idiot. I am not a census bureau employee.
Qtard: Because racist and totalitarian wannabe Derpy do not like it -- to share being White with that nasty "yellowish" asians?
I never said Asian people have yellow skin. YOU did. Chinese people aren't Simpsons characters. Yellow isn't a skin color any human has. Unless they have jaundice.
\\We were talking about your moronic assertion that Chinese people are White Supremacists.
So... they not white? Chinese? ;-P
Go. Say it. Reveal your racistic nature. Derpy. :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\ I said NOTHING about discriminating based on "place of living". Or ethnicity.
YOUR WORDS (you habitually trying to ignore and dismiss) ;-P
Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
Because they aren't European, they're Asian.
July 13, 2023 at 2:51 PM
Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...
As per www.census.gov...
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report responses such as German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, and Egyptian. The category also includes groups such as Polish, French, Iranian, Slavic, Cajun, Chaldean, etc.
July 13, 2023 at 4:44 PM
Isn't they mean that you trying to DENY Chinese being White -- of which ANYBODY can make own judgment -- just by looking at mr. Xi's face... and it's WHITE!!!!
Which shows your inclination to the most ancient and preposterouis form of trogloditic racism. ;-P
\\Talk to the people at the census bureau, idiot. I am not a census bureau employee.
Why do you use their words, idiot? If you do not undertand what they mean, idiot? ;-P
\\I never said Asian people have yellow skin. YOU did.
No, deepshit. :-)))))
I ASKED you -- WHY you do not call white Chinese WHITE???!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))
On what base? What reasoning?
WHY you DENY their Natural Right to be white???
And suprime. ;-P
Qtard: So... they not white? Chinese? Go. Say it. Reveal your racistic nature.
I already said Chinese people are Asian. My acknowledgement of this fact has nothing to do with racism. Is the US Census Bureau a racist government agency? They only hire racists? If Qtard was a US citizen he could probably get a job there.
Qtard: Isn't they mean that you trying to DENY Chinese being White...
I'm not. Why would I? I don't need to deny qtarded non-facts. Facts just are. Same for non-facts. Like Chinese being White.
Qtard: ...which ANYBODY can make own judgment -- just by looking at mr. Xi's face... and it's WHITE!!!!
Xi Jinping's skin is not white. Very few people have anything close to white skin. Albinos. Otherwise people of European descent and Asian descent generally have similar skintones. But we were talking about Race, not skin color.
Qtard: Which shows your inclination to the most ancient and preposterouis form of trogloditic racism.
What is preposterous is Qtard's moronic assertions that Asian people don't exist. According to Qtard, I (as a White person of European descent) could go to China and pass for Chinese. Given that (according to Qtard) me and a Chinese person are both White.
In any case, HOW could I possibly be racist toward a Chinese person, if there is no way to tell if a person is Chinese? Chinese people (as per Qtard) are White, so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person? Because, if a Chinese person were standing if front of me, I'd just see a fellow White person.
Note that I have never said "Whites are superior to other races". Because that is stupid. The comment above is Mystere pretending to be me. And expressing HIS belief that "Whites are superior to other races".
Qtard WHY you DENY their Natural Right to be white??? And suprime.
I assume you mean "supreme". White is supreme is what you're saying? Yes? How is that NOT racist?? If White is supreme then darker skin must be inferior. As per qtarded "logic". I say it's proof Qtard is a racist.
btw, how is being White a "natural right"? Proof that Qtard has no idea what natural rights are. As proven in previous discussions about the J6 insurrectionists.
\\I already said Chinese people are Asian.
But not white???
\\I don't need to deny qtarded non-facts. Facts just are. Same for non-facts. Like Chinese being White.
Gibberish nonsense. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Derpy's Escape. YET ONE time. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Xi Jinping's skin is not white. Very few people have anything close to white skin. Albinos. Otherwise people of European descent and Asian descent generally have similar skintones.
To understand China you need to understand whiteness, yet it's ...
www.abc.net.au › news › race-and-whiteness-k...
15 жовт. 2022 р. · If whiteness is power, Xi Jinping is its champion. The continuation of white power, in darker skin. Stan Grant is the ABC's international ...
\\But we were talking about Race, not skin color.
Defining "race" by skintone... especially one historically debunked and throwen out (like segregation into White, Black, Red and Yellow) -- that is what RACISM(tm) is about.
In our 21st century especially.
There is broad consensus across the biological and social sciences that race is a social construct, not an accurate representation of human genetic variation. Humans are remarkably genetically similar, sharing approximately 99.9% of their genetic code with one another.
Race and genetics - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Race_and_genetics
\\What is preposterous is Qtard's moronic assertions that Asian people don't exist. According to Qtard, I (as a White person of European descent) could go to China and pass for Chinese. Given that (according to Qtard) me and a Chinese person are both White.
Ditto.
You are racist. Derpy.
This your reaction is a genuine racistic outrage "what???!!!! you comparing me with THAT... (insert your favourate racistic slurr here)"
\\In any case, HOW could I possibly be racist toward a Chinese person, if there is no way to tell if a person is Chinese?
Yet one genuinely racistic reaction. ;-P
\\Chinese people (as per Qtard) are White, so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person? Because, if a Chinese person were standing if front of me, I'd just see a fellow White person.
Yap, Derpy, yap. ;-P
Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Note that I have never said "Whites are superior to other races". Because that is stupid.
With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? ;-P
But... I'm sure. You are not.
You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\I assume you mean "supreme". White is supreme is what you're saying? Yes? How is that NOT racist?? If White is supreme then darker skin must be inferior. As per qtarded "logic". I say it's proof Qtard is a racist.
Aha. :-))))))))))))))))))))
Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists.
Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin? ;-P
Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists???
Because racist Derpy do not want top see em as his equal???
See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"
\\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?
Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Proof that Qtard has no idea what natural rights are. As proven in previous discussions about the J6 insurrectionists.
Proof? Proved? :-)))))))))))))))))))))
With WHAT facts??? With WHAT logic???
Idiot Derpy just keep demonstrating its mental disability -- inability to understand even defintion of what FACT is. ;-P
Qtard: To understand China you need to understand whiteness, yet it's ... If whiteness is power, Xi Jinping is its champion. The continuation of white power, in darker skin. Stan Grant is the ABC's international...
Stan Grant: "China, like so many other non-white nations, has felt the sting of white imperialism". (excerpt from the article you cite).
Qtard: There is broad consensus across the biological and social sciences that race is a social construct, not an accurate representation of human genetic variation. Humans are remarkably genetically similar, sharing approximately 99.9% of their genetic code with one another.
*I* cited TO YOU the fact that race is a social construct -- the last time we had this idiotic discussion.
Qtard: You are racist. Derpy. This your reaction is a genuine racistic outrage "what???!!!! you comparing me with THAT... (insert your favourate racistic slurr here)".
FAKE quote. Or "summary" of my words. That is NOT my reaction. What outrage? I don't have a "favorite" racist slur, asshole.
Qtard: \\In any case, HOW could I possibly be racist toward a Chinese person, if there is no way to tell if a person is Chinese?\\Yet one genuinely racistic reaction.
Bullshit. If a Chinese person's race is White, how can I tell if they are Chinese?
Qtard: Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch.
You truly are an idiot.
Qtard: With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? But... I'm sure. You are not.
Of course not. There was no "white supremacist raving" of mine for me to dismiss.
Qtard: You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.
No. Because I never wrote any such words.
Qtard: Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists. Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin?
No. I think those people are idiots. And that they are inferior.
Qtard: Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists???
I don't care. White Supremacists (White idiots who see themselves as superior) will disagree though. But I don't know who you're talking about. Give me some quotes from Chinese people who say they are "white supremacists". There might be some. They are idiots too.
Qtard: Because racist Derpy do not want top see em as his equal???
There is no such person as "racist Derpy". *I* reject racism. Racists (people like you) are STUPID.
Qtard: See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"
Your answer is....???
Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.
You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.
Qtard: \\Proof that Qtard has no idea what natural rights are. As proven in previous discussions about the J6 insurrectionists.\\ Proof? Proved? With WHAT facts??? With WHAT logic???
Proved by Qtard's assertion that overthrowing democracy is a "natural right".
Idiot Qtard just keeps demonstrating it's mental disability -- inability to understand even definition of what a FACT is.
\\Stan Grant: "China, like so many other non-white nations, has felt the sting of white imperialism". (excerpt from the article you cite).
Yap.
Grant-racist babbling the same as Derpy-racist. ;-P
Or what? You will not admit him being White as you, too???
Because he is nasty aussy??? With different, not noble skintone as you??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\*I* cited TO YOU the fact that race is a social construct -- the last time we had this idiotic discussion.
So??? On what base you dening Chinese being whitish and suprimish, ah, Derpy?
On that racistic base -- that YOU do not agree with it, alone??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\FAKE quote. Or "summary" of my words. That is NOT my reaction. What outrage? I don't have a "favorite" racist slur, asshole.
You.
Do Not.
Want.
To be compared with "those non-white" Chinese. ;-P
Obviously.
Or... you can try to explain and elaborate -- why your opaque claim means something else...
But, naah...
You can't do that.
Have no brains. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Bullshit. If a Chinese person's race is White, how can I tell if they are Chinese?
You.
Above.
Tryed to claim that "race its social construct" its YOUR WORDS.
But.
With this glaring bullshit... just confirmed that you have ZILCH understanding what that phrase "race its social construct" even mean. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch.
\\You truly are an idiot.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Ve-e-e-eRY damning. From a cocroach. ;-P
\\Qtard: With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? But... I'm sure. You are not.
\\Of course not.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And... what did I say.
My prediction of your reactions -- is flawless. ;-P
\\Qtard: You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.
\\No. Because I never wrote any such words.
Oh, yes. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
Just more lies and denial, from heinous liar and hypocrite. ;-P
\\Qtard: Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists???
\\I don't care. White Supremacists (White idiots who see themselves as superior) will disagree though.
Self-contradicting.
Why you use that capitalized "White Supremacists" and running after people accusing em being W.S.s??? If you'd "don't care"??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))0
But well, just another obvious lie and denyal from heinouis liar and hypocrite. AGAIN.
Nothing new. And *consistent* with all previous observations.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists. Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin?
\\No. I think those people are idiots. And that they are inferior.
Yap.
YOU said it. ;-P
But... as proven heinouis liar and hypocrite... you will try to deny it. Just in the next comment. ;-P
\\Give me some quotes from Chinese people who say they are "white supremacists".
Do that people you try to smear being "White Supremacists" call themself W.S.s???
Rethorical question.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Because racist Derpy do not want top see em as his equal???
\\There is no such person as "racist Derpy". *I* reject racism. Racists (people like you) are STUPID.
Yap.
The same as you rejected people their Natural and their Human Rights.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"
\\Your answer is....???
I already gave it -- excerpt from Wikipedia. ;-P
But you... have no brains to understand it.
Even though you tryed to claim that you said it first. :-))))
\\Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.
\\You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.
Yet one idiotic "rebuff".
Yawn.
\\Proved by Qtard's assertion that overthrowing democracy is a "natural right".
Aha...
Only. There is NO. Not posible to "overthrone democracy". Because Democracy mean -- that there is NO THRONE... no kings or tyrants.
And as such -- it's impossible to over-THRONE something that is NOT exist.
And people's autonomy to decide for themself -- that is natural fact of this Reality.
EVEN SLAVES can uprise against injustice. Because not matter what thier masters would like to think -- they HAVE their autonomy, andcan decide for themself.
But... heinous liar and hyupocrite, totalitarian wannabe, racistic and white-supremacistic ;-P Derpy... do not like it, yes???
Because it sees itself as Master??? ;-P
\\Idiot Qtard just keeps demonstrating it's mental disability -- inability to understand even definition of what a FACT is.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue.
You can even copy-paste WHOLE my comment, as response to my comment.
To confirm how enormously BIG idiot U R!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: So??? On what base you dening Chinese being whitish and suprimish, ah, Derpy? On that racistic base -- that YOU do not agree with it, alone???
I acknowledge the social construct of race exists. A point-to-reality fact. And that, under this construct, Chinese people are Asian. Whereas Qtard denies this point-to-reality fact. In order to falsely paint me as a racist. When it is Qtard who is the racist. He once referred to himself as "ziz nigga", then insisted "nigga" has nothing to do with race.
Qtard: You. Do Not. Want. To be compared with "those non-white" Chinese. Obviously.
I wouldn't want to be compared to Qtard, an obvious idiot. And racist.
Qtard: Or... you can try to explain and elaborate -- why your opaque claim means something else... But, naah... You can't do that.
I can. Race is based on skin color and other features. A Chinese person can be identified as Asian despite having light skin. Qtard denies this? If Qtard was shown a picture of a "White person" and asked, "is this person Chinese?", Qtard would say "there is no way of knowing based only on appearance"?
Qtard: Have no brains. :-))))))))))))))))))))
I agree. Qtard is definitely lacking when it comes to brains.
Qtard: //If a Chinese person's race is White, how can I tell if they are Chinese?// You. Above. Tryed to claim that "race its social construct" its YOUR WORDS. But. With this glaring bullshit... just confirmed that you have ZILCH understanding what that phrase "race its social construct" even mean.
So, if it is impossible to tell (based on appearance) if a person is Chinese, HOW can any Chinese person be discriminated against by a White/European person?? It (according to your illogic) would be IMPOSSIBLE.
Qtard: Now you see a light... but, will run away from it. Into cosy darkness. Like that cocrouch. \\You truly are an idiot.\\Ve-e-e-eRY damning. From a cocroach.
Whatever, dipshit. I don't give a crap. Given that there is no such thing as a "cocroach". I also don't care if I am a "uurb" or a "junky-doodle" either. Being called qtarded made up notions does not concern me at all.
Qtard: With this... you dismissed your "White Supremacist" raving... as stupid, I dare to ask? But... I'm sure. You are not.\\Of course not.\\And... what did I say. My prediction of your reactions -- is flawless.
So Qtard predicted I would refute Qtard lies. Big deal.
Qtard: You will start screaming "my words mean something ELSE!!!!". AGAIN.\\No. Because I never wrote any such words.\\Oh, yes.\\Just more lies and denial, from heinous liar and hypocrite.
Yes. I will ALWAYS deny Qtard's heinous lies.
Qtard: Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists??? \\I don't care. White Supremacists (White idiots who see themselves as superior) will disagree though.\\Self-contradicting.
No.
Qtard: Why you use that capitalized "White Supremacists" and running after people accusing em being W.S.s??? If you'd "don't care"??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))
Because White Supremacists are racists. I OPPOSE racism. Qtard, as a White Supremacist is obviously offended. But, again, I do not care.
Qtard: But well, just another obvious lie and denyal from heinouis liar and hypocrite. AGAIN. Nothing new. And *consistent* with all previous observations. Yawn.
I continue to deny Qtard's heinous lies. And object to his hypocrisy. Nothing new, indeed.
Qtard: Only one tinsy little thing here -- that is YOU are one who call people White Supremacists. Do YOU think they are superior? Because of their white skin?\\No. I think those people are idiots. And that they are inferior.\\Yap. YOU said it.
I did. And Qtard, as a White Supremacist, is offended. But I don't give a shit.
Qtard: But... as proven heinouis liar and hypocrite... you will try to deny it. Just in the next comment.
Why would I deny that White Supremacists (like you) are idiots? This is a FACT. I don't deny facts, Qtard does.
Qtard: \\Give me some quotes from Chinese people who say they are "white supremacists".\\Do that people you try to smear being "White Supremacists" call themself W.S.s??? Rethorical question. Yawn.
"Why then Chinese... who ALSO have white skin... and want to be superior -- cannot be White Supremacists?"... Qtard's words. Now you say (what they WANT to call themselves, according to you) is a "smear"???
Qtard: The same as you rejected people their Natural and their Human Rights. Yawn.
I DEMAND support for human rights.
Qtard: See his words above: "so if me and a Chinese person are both White, why and how could I be racist toward this person?"\\Your answer is....??? I already gave it -- excerpt from Wikipedia. But you... have no brains to understand it.
Qtard has no brains to understand HOW to tell the difference between a Chinese/Asian person and a European/White person. Though I suspect he CAN tell the difference. He only PRETENDS to not be able to. Because this pretending serves his idiotic smearing of me as racist. When it is Qtard who is the racist.
In the present racists will pretend to be anti-racist. Or "neutral" (what the racist Minus FJ pretends to be).
Qtard: Even though you tryed to claim that you said it first.
Because I did. On 5/27/2023 I wrote, "Races don't exist? As a social construct they do".
You replied, "As a "social construct" for segragation and oppression. As in KKK".
[1] 5/27/2023 is BEFORE 7/17/2023 (when you cited Wikipedia).
[2] You DENIED the existence of the social construct of race. You put "social construct" in quotes and said it was an idea only held by segregationists and people in KKK. NOW you quote it and LIE about me bringing it up first? Say YOU brought it up first? What a lying POS Qtard is.
Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.\\You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.\\ Yet one idiotic "rebuff".Yawn.
Agreed. Your "rebuff" is bigly idiotic.
Qtard: \\Proved by Qtard's assertion that overthrowing democracy is a "natural right".\\Aha...Only. There is NO. Not posible to "overthrone democracy". Because Democracy mean -- that there is NO THRONE... no kings or tyrants.
Does Putin call himself a king or a tyrant? Or does he call himself "president"? MANY tyrants call themselves "president" and insist their countries are "democracies". IDIOT.
Qtard: And as such -- it's impossible to over-THRONE something that is NOT exist.
Democracy exists in the United States. It CAN be overthrown. Qtard WANTS this to happen in the US. Why it makes him sad the J6 insurrection failed. Because Qtard is a bigly fan of totalitarianism.
Qtard: And people's autonomy to decide for themself -- that is natural fact of this Reality.
The People of the United States DID decide. By electing Joe Biden over the totalitarian wannabe, donald tRump.
Qtard: EVEN SLAVES can uprise against injustice. Because not matter what thier masters would like to think -- they HAVE their autonomy, andcan decide for themself.
Slavery was outlawed in the United States. Slave rebellions in the past were put down, but they were justified. UNLIKE the J6 rebellion. Which was NOT justified. Because it was an attempt to overthrow democracy. By sore losers who had the opportunity and right to vote (whether or not they actually exercised it). The J6 insurrection wasn't a slave rebellion. IDIOT.
Qtard: But... heinous liar and hyupocrite, totalitarian wannabe, racistic and white-supremacistic ;-P Derpy... do not like it, yes???
Yawn. You're referring to an IMAGINARY person. I am none of those things. I strongly support democracy and strongly oppose racism and White Supremacy.
Qtard does not like that the J6 insurrection was unsuccessful. Because it would make the totalitarian wannabe very happy to see US democracy overthrown.
Qtard: Because it sees itself as Master??? ;-P
***SARCASM BANNER***
(included for qtarded idiots who can NOT recognize sarcasm).
Sure, that's it. You nailed it.
Continue-continue. To confirm how enormously BIG idiot you are!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I just noticed that Qtard wrote "over-THRONE" instead of "overthrown". What is this Qtarded bullshit? We were discussing democracy being overthrown, not "over-throne". Of course there is no such thing as "over-throne".
Qtard is an IDIOT. A TOTAL idiot.
Dervy's heroes...
\\I acknowledge the social construct of race exists. A point-to-reality fact.
Yap!
In the minds of racists.
And you are racists. Couse you admitting it. HERE. Of your free volition. ;-P
\\ Whereas Qtard denies this point-to-reality fact. In order to falsely paint me as a racist.
At this point... you either dumb racist. OR. Just and idiot (with racistic views) who do not understand what "being social construct" mean. ;-P
\\Qtard: You. Do Not. Want. To be compared with "those non-white" Chinese. Obviously.
\\I wouldn't want to be compared to Qtard, an obvious idiot. And racist.
Quite intolerant. Racistic claim, even. ;-P
\\Qtard: Or... you can try to explain and elaborate -- why your opaque claim means something else... But, naah... You can't do that.
\\I can. Race is based on skin color and other features.
No.
It's not. There is no people with Yellow, Red or even Black skin.
That all are historically throwed out prejudges.
By all... apart from followers of Racism. ;-P
And you are one. Apparently.
\\So, if it is impossible to tell (based on appearance) if a person is Chinese, HOW can any Chinese person be discriminated against by a White/European person?? It (according to your illogic) would be IMPOSSIBLE.
Yellow starts Nazis made Jews wearing... was it not enough to decide if that is Jew before you, by his "racial traits"???
\\Whatever, dipshit. I don't give a crap. Given that there is no such thing as a "cocroach". I also don't care if I am a "uurb" or a "junky-doodle" either.
Yap.
Cause you are idiot.
And that is your Natural Right to keep being idiot.
So... there is nothing damning in calling you idiot. As you are one. ;-P
That is just a correct observation and definition of what one sees.
\\\\Self-contradicting.
\\No.
Of course.
Natural Idiot would not be able to see self-contradiction point in own blurts.
It would not be idiot, if it would. ;-P
YET ONE trait. CONFIRMED!
\\I OPPOSE racism.
With denying Chinese being white? And suprime? ;-P
\\This is a FACT. I don't deny facts, Qtard does.
Self-contradiction.
Yawn.
\\I DEMAND support for human rights.
Yeah...
But not for 6Jan rioters... or Chinese... or dRump. ;-P
\\Qtard: Even though you tryed to claim that you said it first.
\\Because I did. On 5/27/2023 I wrote, "Races don't exist? As a social construct they do".
\\You replied, "As a "social construct" for segragation and oppression. As in KKK".
Yap.
You declared your creed of racist that time.
Thank you for reminding it.
I almost forgot about it. ;-P
\\[2] You DENIED the existence of the social construct of race. You put "social construct" in quotes and said it was an idea only held by segregationists and people in KKK.
Yap.
Because that is what "being social construct" mean. ;-P
People -- who have this or that prejudges or delusions.
\\Qtard: \\btw, how is being White a "natural right"?\\Idiotic question. Perfectly idiotic.\\You're the one who said whiteness is a "natural right", not me.\\ Yet one idiotic "rebuff".Yawn.
\\Agreed. Your "rebuff" is bigly idiotic.
Piling up idiotic "rebuffs"???
But we already know that you are idiot. For sure. Here. ;-P
\\Does Putin call himself a king or a tyrant? Or does he call himself "president"? MANY tyrants call themselves "president" and insist their countries are "democracies". IDIOT.
No need to give your signature in every paragraph. ;-P
And.
Congrats Derpy. You just admitted that NOT all who claim being democratic are democrats. ;-P
Like you are here -- totalitarian wannabe and racists, who try to call itself anti-racists and etc... :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Bigly an idiot. And idiotic hypocrite. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Because it sees itself as Master??? ;-P
***SARCASM BANNER***
\\(included for qtarded idiots who can NOT recognize sarcasm).
\\Sure, that's it. You nailed it.
\\Continue-continue. To confirm how enormously BIG idiot you are!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
YAP! :-)))))))))))))))))
You just showed that you do not understand sarcasm.
Most important part of it -- wit. Something you totally lacking.
That's why you thinking that anything you can say contrary to someting else -- is sarcasm.
But.
That was MY sarcastic remark. About you being Master...
AND YOU ADMITED IT!!!
What an idiot. :-))))))))))))))))))))))
Etymology, origin and meaning of overthrow by etymonline
www.etymonline.com › word › overthrow
overthrow (v.) c. 1300, ouerthrouen, "to knock down, throw down, cast headlong," from over- + throw (v.). Figurative sense of "to cast down from power, defeat" is attested from late 14c.
Minor and essentially meaningless differences in appearance are the basis of "race". All humans are, DNA-wise, virtually identical. Why racism is so stupid. I never admitted that I subscribe to this stupidity. I reject it. I never said I didn't want to be compared to "that". I never said White is "noble". Those are Qtard's words. Hypocrite who demands "precise" quotes. Then fabricates quotes for me. Or offers false deduction "what derpy really mean".
Qtard ADMITTED his racism. Via his defense of White Supremacy. Claimed I was slandering bigots by pointing out their White Supremacy. Because White Supremacists like Qtard are not the racists, the "real racists" are anti-racists like me.
Minor and essentially meaningless differences in appearance are the basis of "race". All humans are, DNA-wise, virtually identical. Why racism is so stupid. I never admitted that I subscribe to this stupidity. I reject it. I never said I didn't want to be compared to "that". I never said White is "noble". Those are Qtard's words. Hypocrite who demands "precise" quotes. Then fabricates quotes for me. Or offers false deduction "what derpy really mean".
Qtard ADMITTED his racism. Via his defense of White Supremacy. Claimed I was slandering bigots by pointing out their White Supremacy. Because White Supremacists like Qtard are not the racists, the "real racists" are anti-racists like me.
Qtard runned away.
It was getting a bit windy...
\\Hypocrite who demands "precise" quotes. Then fabricates quotes for me. Or offers false deduction "what derpy really mean".
Well... you have all power of Ctrl-Fing -- to find precice quotes of that "nasty Qtard"... and all pwerful framwork of Logic -- to confirm your this claim.
But.
Naaaah.
You flatly and completely CAN'T... CANNOT accomplish anything like that.
Even Ctrl-Fing is beyond your miserly ability.
That ios what being imbecile accounts for. ;-P
\\Qtard ADMITTED his racism.
And where's that precise quote???
Or... that "Qtard" that is some opponent from your delusions, you trying to talk against in your nightmares? That's why that words cannot be found anywhere here, and cannot be quoted? ;-P
\\Via his defense of White Supremacy.
Ough???!! So, you OPPOSING White Supremacy? Claiming that there's no such thing? And not one who just throwing left and right that baseless unintelligible accusation.
Like... why it should be shameful, to have white skin????
\\Claimed I was slandering bigots by pointing out their White Supremacy.
Calling someone "bigot" on the base of skin color... ehm, isn't that sounds like racism? ;-P
\\Because White Supremacists like Qtard are not the racists, the "real racists" are anti-racists like me.
Yup. ;-P
Ctrl-F searches ONLY the page you are on. There are many pages on this blog. Ctrl-F does not search them. How am I supposed to know what quotes Qtard is going to lie about later? Why should I spend hours searching many pages to find a Qtard quote? When Qtard KNOWS what it said? What good would it do anyway? Qtard would STILL deny it. Like when Qtard claimed John Durham said "dRump collusion with Rasha FAKE". Precise quote given, yet Qtard claims he never said it. Why I said I wasn't going to play your FM games any longer.
Yep.
You not going to "play games" which involve operating with firm and definite facts and correct logical inferences... because you dislike it?
But, in reality, you just have no brains for that. My little funny-brain idiot.
Hint: there is "site:" option in Google Search.
Or many-many other variants of how one can search for proper quotes...
if only that one smart enough... even for using such a simple tools. ;-P
Post a Comment