You're anticipating dotard exacting retribution with glee, aren't you? donald tRump has to get back in the White House first, Minus. There will be no 2nd term tRump agenda unless there is a tRump second term. Is he going to run from prison?
Comey lied under oath? Video states it as a fact. But it's an allegation made by dotard donald. Even IF tRump were president, James Comey would have rights. tRump also said he was going to have HRC locked up in his first term? Did that happen, Minus?
Is tRump (in a hypothetical second term) going to be a dictator who can imprison people on his say-so? That is what you want, right? Not a tRump second term as president of the United States, but for dotard donald to be installed as American dictator.
I was asked how Ukrainians can preserve democracy during the war?
Ukrainians do not need to preserve or somehow protect democracy. Ukrainians are democracy.
We, Ukrainians, are the ones in whose veins genuine national democracy flows. It is the democracy that destroys the walls of regimes and breaks through the iron curtains of dictatorship and gives life to the new and free.
Do you want to argue? Do you know who Ukrainians are?
Ukrainians are the descendants of soldiers who called their army "brotherhood". These are the descendants of those who were among the first to draw up the first Constitution in the world. Descendants of those who elected their leaders and Hetmans by voting. Descendants of those who overcame the strongest regime in the world. Ukrainian democracy is elusive. It cannot be killed or banned. It is impossible to starve. It is transmitted with blood and absorbed with mother's milk. In my life, I experienced several people's revolutions, then ATO, and finally - a full-scale war with a front (duration) longer than the Second World War. And you know what? I constantly see the spirit of Ukrainian democracy, the spirit of the Ukrainian people's revolution."
Qtard: Seeking for a thought crimes, ah, De-Ru-Pi??? To report to Something-Something-Gaspacho?
Qtard ignores Minus FJ's stated desire to bring totalitarianism to the United States in the form of a "president for life". With (again) false charges against me. Why? I think because he likes Minus FJ's idea of tRump being "president for life". Qtard just outed himself (again) as a totalitarian wannabe.
\\Qtard ignores Minus FJ's stated desire to bring totalitarianism to the United States in the form of a "president for life".
Do I have a reason to NOT think that that is merely a joke???
\\With (again) false charges against me. Why?
Cause... your behavior -- very consistent. ;-P
With definition of a totalitarian wannabe. Which I observe and confirm here. With facts. For a half a year, already.
So??? What is more solid reason for a confidence? Just one snarky comment? OR. Half a year of transparent and stubborn behavior?
\\I think because he likes Minus FJ's idea of tRump being "president for life".
I. Don't care. And. Have no play in this game -- how'd I could influence that choice??? While being just a miserly foreigner, who lurking as anonimous.
\\Qtard just outed himself (again) as a totalitarian wannabe.
And you can EXPLAIN??? How that "Qtard just outed himself (again)" can have ANY meaningful corespondence with Reality?
Naah. You can't. My little mexiCAN'T :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Also... "Gaspacho" (aka Gazpacho)?? LOL! Are you a Marjorie Taylor Greene fan? She is also an FM (like you) who confused cold soup with Hitler's secret police (aka Gestapo).
Ough... so that was Ge? Ghe.. staPo???
Ough... you are obviously totalitarian wannabe -- you know all such totalitarian words so perfectly. Maybe because you LOVE em, so much?
SEE. I can use your idiotic non-logic on you too. :-))))))))))))))
Cause I THAT smart (for at least).
But YOU -- cannot use MY logic against me.
Cause you are THAT dumb. Unredeamable. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Do I have a reason to NOT think that that is merely a joke???
Absolutely not. Because believing that Minus FJ isn't an OBVIOUS totalitarian (contrary to the voluminous evidence) would run counter to your false and fact-free narrative that I (a strong supporter of democracy) am actually a totalitarian.
Just call it a "joke". Like the Ukrainian soldier who admitted to being a Nazi. Qtard says he was "joking". That the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis and Putin invaded to "denazify" is categorically false. However, that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis is true. Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.
Qtard even falsely claimed that it is Democrats who are assisting Putin in spreading this propaganda. When it's republicans who are doing it. Also fake lefties like Jimmy Dore, RFK Jr, and others (Minus FJ laughably calls this "intellectual integrity").
Qtard: Cause... your behavior -- very consistent. With definition of a totalitarian wannabe. Which I observe and confirm here. With facts. For a half a year, already.
Self evident lie. Given my strong support for democracy. And being against its overthrow. While you (with your support for the J6 rioters) strongly support American transitioning to a totalitarian state via the installation of donald tRump as dictator-for-life (NOT a Minus FJ "joke"). Proof that it is YOUR behavior is very consistent with the definition of a totalitarian wannabe.
Qtard: So??? What is more solid reason for a confidence? Just one snarky comment? OR. Half a year of transparent and stubborn behavior?
Yup. I stubbornly support democracy. And I stubbornly oppose it's overthrow. While Minus with his "snarky comment" and you (with your lies about J6 rioters exercising their "right" to overthrow US democracy and lie about installing a dictator being a "joke" or "snarky comment") are stubborn totalitarians.
Qtard: I. Don't care. And. Have no play in this game -- how'd I could influence that choice??? While being just a miserly foreigner, who lurking as anonimous.
If you didn't care, you'd go away. As opposed to commenting on things you SAY you "don't care" about. People can have opinions on things they can't influence. Like my opinion of donald tRump's guilt. Even though I can not influence any court decision. Or even influence whether or not charges are brought.
As for "lurking as anonimous", is that why you don't enter "Q" when making your comments any longer? Or... maybe you don't use "Q" any longer because you were embarrassed for being outed as a Trekkie?
Qtard: \\Qtard just outed himself (again) as a totalitarian wannabe.\\ And you can EXPLAIN???
Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the overthrow of democracy in the US. Proven by your unending defense the J6 rioters. And insistence that they had a right to use violence to change the results of a free and fair election. Only because they are sore losers.
Also your unending defense of the dictator-wannabe donald tRump and unending denials of his obvious collusion with Putin to steal the 2020 election from Hillary Clinton and turn America into a totalitarian state. One were political opponents are locked up. ENDORSED by Minus FJ in this very post. A persecutory prosecution of James Comey because he refused to pledge loyalty to dotard donald.
Qtard: you know all such totalitarian words so perfectly. Maybe because you LOVE em, so much?
Qtard knows them too. Even though Qtard (a la MTG) used "Gaspacho" when he meant "Gestapo". Explanation? Qtard loves them so much. Why he suggested that he would turn me in to the "Gestapo". Here Qtard wrote, "But, don't sweat it -- I will not report you. Maybe".
For the thought crime of opposing the overthrow of democracy. As if that would work. I'd be arrested for AGREEING with the decision of Merrick Garland to prosecute the J6 rioters? If Qtard says this was a "joke"? It was a "joke" an FM would make. And proof (either way) that Qtard is a totalitarian wannabe.
Qtard and Minus FJ know the totalitarian playbook and deploy the tactics in it relentlessly. Accuse others of what they are guilty of. Like Democrats being the "real" racists. Something Qtard JUST did. Here Qtard slandered me with a false claim that a comment I made was, kinda like "I dispise racism... and nigers". This is FALSE. I despise racism and White Supremacists. People like Minus FJ and Qtard.
And (of course) his unending false accusations that I am a "totalitarian wannabe". When this is provably false. I support fair trials. Qtard agrees but places quotation marks around "fair". Implying that I do not support fair trials, but sham trials that only appear to be fair. Which is a lie.
Qtard: Cause I THAT smart (for at least). But YOU -- cannot use MY logic against me.
It isn't that I can NOT, but that I WILL not. Because I am honest. I won't use YOUR dishonest "logic". "Logic" that includes lying and playing FM games. Deny what you've said and ask for quotes. Then say I don't give quotes (after I do) or say (falsely) that the quote is "not correct" (when YOU quote ME incorrectly).
Also accuse me of what you are guilty of (being a totalitarian wannabe), (laughably) claim that you're right because you cite facts that "point to reality", while facts I provide are "Demn propaganda" and "bullshit" and don't "point to reality", (laughably) claim that you use logic and give evidence while I don't (despite the fact that I DO). And other dishonest tactics I'm probably forgetting.
\\Because believing that Minus FJ isn't an OBVIOUS totalitarian (contrary to the voluminous evidence)
WHAT "voluminous evidence"???????????????!!!
JUST ONE comment we discussing here?
Dare to give examples of more???
Naah.
Cause that'll reveal your lies.
So, you'd try to squint, derail and flood that question with feces.
Because you are FEARING FACTS totalitarian. ;-P
\\ would run counter to your false and fact-free narrative that I (a strong supporter of democracy) am actually a totalitarian.
Yap.
YET ONE trait of totalitarian confirmed -- that is all "narratives" for totalitarian -- that is the way they twist, derail and thwart the Truth.
See. Voluminous evidences!
In almost EVERY your coment here.
And in YOUR denial... that you DID that comment. Even if it JUST PREVIOUS one.
You trying to "make believe" that it mean something else. And that how you pushing totalitarian agenda, like about "people *not* have their human rights" and etc. ;-P
\\Just call it a "joke". Like the Ukrainian soldier who admitted to being a Nazi. Qtard says he was "joking".
That is... liliPut's Poisonous Totalitarian Propaganda.
And why I am NOT surprised that you rised this flag too. ;-P
\\However, that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis is true.
That's absolutly counter-factual (almost) century old totalitarian bullshit -- devised by Stalin to call ALL people that oppose Communistic Plague -- a nazi.
Trying to rub in false equivalence Nationalism == national-SOCIALISTIC imperialism.
While. Who is nazis??? Really. That is memebers of national-SOCIALISTIC party of Germany.
Can Ukrainian soldier be a member of NSDAP??? Obviously not.
Is there ANY party in Ukraine that can be called resembling NSDAP??? Obviously not. (but there IS... in Rusha)
Maybe there, in Ukraine there is somebody, anybody who pushing messainic imperialistic idea about rule over all World??? Obviouslu not. Ukraine is in the fight AGAINST such force.
Which trying to stick to opponent label of being "nazis". In all accordance with after WW2 precarious suggestion -- that "nazis of the future... will be calling themself anti-nazi".
\\Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.
Hah... but you are ears deep in it. ;-P
\\Qtard even falsely claimed that it is Democrats who are assisting Putin in spreading this propaganda.
Yap.
That was spread via CNN, for example. That idea that there is any nazis in Ukraine. And that... that you repeat that BS -- more than damning evidance, here.
\\When it's republicans who are doing it.
And you are ready to provide factual example(s)???
Naah.
\\Also fake lefties like Jimmy Dore, RFK Jr, and others (Minus FJ laughably calls this "intellectual integrity").
\\Qtard: Cause... your behavior -- very consistent. With definition of a totalitarian wannabe. Which I observe and confirm here. With facts. For a half a year, already.
\\Self evident lie. Given my strong support for democracy.
What "support of democrcy"??? That is when you said: "I *DO* deny..." them their rights??? ;-P
Who could say such thing -- only totalitarian. And you NEVER tryed to disproove it. As EVEN you, heinous liar -- know that it's true. That's why you NEVER tryed to oppose it with facts and logic... and only trying to flood it all with verbal feces. ;-P
Like here. Where you rised AGAIN. And without ANY apparent connection with talks here. That nasty smelly question of nazism.
Just for one thing -- to produce MORE verbal manure.
EXACTLY what totalitarian would do... and actuslly doing, like liliPut JUST NOW, who blowed a dam... and trying to rub in homericly false idea -- that Ukrainains themself did it.
THERE IS NO lie... to which totalitarian would not fall... to push his nasty ideas and narratives.
And that is -- what YOU doing. Here.
Go disprove it... that you are nasty totalitarian... wannabe.
\\Yup. I stubbornly support democracy. And I stubbornly oppose it's overthrow.
Democracy -- that is constant change of those who can be a proxy to the power of WE, the People.
That means, there is nothing like that "overthrow of democracy" can exist.
Only USURPATION of Power -- that is what can happen.
But. We can use "overthrow" an par with "king, despot, autocrats".
See... even words you are using is that of a totalitarian. ;-P
\\lie about installing a dictator being a "joke" or "snarky comment"
Yep.
Cause I know History.
It's not so easy to "install a disctator".
People themself MUST want it.
Are you that nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian, who think about people of use that bad -- that they want dictator??? Even that J6 rioters? ;-P
Here we again. With your totlitarian try to prescribe to other people -- what they must do. ;-P
And you tryiong to say that you are NOT totalitarian???
But well, totalitarians, that lying scum, they DO NOT like to admit being totalitarian.
So, that is just another resemblance trait confirmed. ;-P
\\Like my opinion of donald tRump's guilt. Even though I can not influence any court decision.
You alone? Of course.
That's why you admire totalitrain rule -- where'd there's be endless mobs of "likeminded" totalitarians, or thwarted to submit to totalitarians...
\\As for "lurking as anonimous", is that why you don't enter "Q" when making your comments any longer?
Yap. Unneeded courtesy. And waste of time.
\\Or... maybe you don't use "Q" any longer because you were embarrassed for being outed as a Trekkie?
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Yet one time confirmed being a trekkie. Who can see capital "Q" ONLY as connection with ST narrative??? And not as just most left latter key on keyboard. Or, whatever.
\\Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the
No. Do not remember.
Where was that... EVEN ONE damn time. When you did explained something. About your own words.
There was explanations about HRC. Or that TV judge.
But... NO, I do not remember EVEN ONE time... when you'd (with basing it on facts and logic) would explain anything here.
And to remember EVERY of your feces throwing, and to discern what it would mean from your delusional POV... :-))))))))))))))) naah, don't remember, and not inclined to. ;-P
\\And insistence that they had a right to use violence to change the results of a free and fair election.
Going by the street -- that is "use violence"?
Or maybe coming into building into which free public access explicitly allowed -- that is "use violence"?
Declaring their political stance and demand -- that is "use violence"?
YEP. THAT IS.
In totalitarian country like Rusha for example.
Where they PROHIBIT to people all such ways to "use violence". ;-P
\\Qtard knows them too. Even though Qtard (a la MTG) used "Gaspacho" when he meant "Gestapo". Explanation? Qtard loves them so much.
Naah.
I was growing in an environment of Nasty Soviet Totalitarian Propaganda.
Where they tryed to rub-in that nasty bullshit about "ukrainian nazis" and all such things.
OF COURSE, I would know that words!
Why YOU know em... go give YOUR reasons? ;-P
\\Here Qtard wrote, "But, don't sweat it -- I will not report you. Maybe".
Hah... and to whom??? :-)))))
Is there something like Gestapo in USA, already???
\\And proof (either way) that Qtard is a totalitarian wannabe.
Hint. (I gwown bored of your dumbness)
To say something like "proof that" A is something-something.
AT FIRST... you need to give GENERAL statment. Undeniably correct one. Not your wishi-washi wishfoool thinking blurts.
Like. "All policemans on-duty wore uniform".
Then and only than, you can say "this one A wear uniform of a policeman -- that is a PROOF that he is a policeman".
LOGIC!
That os how it works. ;-P
\\Qtard and Minus FJ know the totalitarian playbook and deploy the tactics in it relentlessly. Accuse others...
AND??? How'd you know what in that "totalitarian playbook"??? ;-P
If you are NOT totalitarian?
And well... isn't that WHAT YOU doing... all of the time. "Accuse others". Like calling other liar... while lying yopurself. ;-P
\\And (of course) his unending false accusations that I am a "totalitarian wannabe". When this is provably false.
Than... give proofs. ;-P
Why ONLY I are one who giving proofs here. Isn't that unfair -- to ask for proofs, but not provide em?
\\I support fair trials.
Yap. "Fair trials", while people being caled "guilty" long before em. ;-P
VERY "fair". As in Nazi's Germany. Are you Jew? Then you are guilty. Go to... a camp of your choice: Dahau, or maybe Oswentsim, Aushwits? Good choice.
\\Qtard agrees but places quotation marks around "fair". Implying that I do not support fair trials, but sham trials that only appear to be fair. Which is a lie.
Well. Trials when it is defined BEFORE they started even who are guilty -- is a definition of sham trials. Yes.
Have something to oppose that?
Would you DARE to oppose?
To that LOGICAL conclusion. ;-P
\\It isn't that I can NOT, but that I WILL not. Because I am honest.
Yap. Especially when you screaming "I didn't SAID THAT"... to provingly YOUR OWN WORDS!!! Like "I *DO* deny...."
THAT IS... honesty???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Funny one. NOT. :-(
Millions of people do die... because of SUCH "honesty".
\\I won't use YOUR dishonest "logic".
Yap.
Liars DO FEAR and dispise Honest Logic of Aristotle. ;-P For a more then 2000 years ALREADY!
With this. It's confirmed. Proved even. That you are -- relentlessly militant heinous LIAR.
Liar-liar, pents on fire. ;-P
\\Because YOU are irredeemably dishonest and dumb.
That's why you have such a big problems with basing your miserly basless claims ON FACTS???
Yap.
I gotcha. FACTS -- that is what hinders such a "honest" and "smart" ... as you.
Qtard: So, you'd try to squint, derail and flood that question with feces. Because you are FEARING FACTS totalitarian.
I won't. I'm not. Qtard fears facts.
Qtard: YET ONE trait of totalitarian confirmed -- that is all "narratives" for totalitarian -- that is the way they twist, derail and thwart the Truth.
Narratives can be built using lies. Narratives can be built using truth and facts. You assume that "narrative" means lies because those are the narratives you (as a totalitarian) like. Like your narrative that tRump is innocent because he has not been charged in court. Or, if he isn't being charged it is because Democrats are protecting him. That is a false narrative. The true narrative is that prosecuting a former president is difficult. Especially when an entire party is corrupt and protecting him (republicans). Republicans didn't protect Nixon. Why he left office. While tRump could be president again.
Qtard: See. Voluminous evidences! In almost EVERY your coment here.
I don't see. Because your claim is false.
Qtard: And in YOUR denial... that you DID that comment. Even if it JUST PREVIOUS one.
I don't know what "that comment" is. A comment Qtard faked and I never made? Yes, I will deny that comment. A comment I actually made but for which Qtard makes up "what I really meant"? I won't deny the comment, but I WILL deny the meaning that Qtard made up.
Qtard: You trying to "make believe" that it mean something else.
Qtard "makes believe" that it means something else.
Qtard: And that how you pushing totalitarian agenda, like about "people *not* have their human rights" and etc.
Like this one. Qtard makes believe I said "people *not* have their human rights". People DO have their human rights. Always. Sore losers violently attacking the Capitol to reverse the results of a free and fair democratic election -- NOT a "human right".
Qtard: \\me: Just call it a "joke". Like the Ukrainian soldier who admitted to being a Nazi. Qtard says he was "joking".\\ That is... liliPut's Poisonous Totalitarian Propaganda.
It isn't. That the Ukranian government is overrun with Nazis and that Russia needed to invade to "deNazify" Ukraine is Putin's propaganda. Not that a small minority of Ukranian soldiers self-idenity as Nazis.
Qtard: And why I am NOT surprised that you rised this flag too.
You aren't surprised that I tell the truth? I thought it was your contention that I am a "heinous liar"?
Qtard: \\me: However, that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis is true.\\ That's absolutly counter-factual (almost) century old totalitarian bullshit -- devised by Stalin to call ALL people that oppose Communistic Plague -- a nazi.
It is objective truth. A "pointing to reality" fact. That a SMALL minority of Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis. Not that "ALL people that oppose Communistic Plague -- a nazi". A small minority is far less than ALL. Qtard tries to conflat my pointing to reality with propaganda because he is a heinous liar.
Qtard: Can Ukrainian soldier be a member of NSDAP??? Obviously not.
The NSDAP only existed between 1920 and 1945. NOBODY can be a member because it no longer exists. We were talking about people who identify with Nazi ideology.
Qtard: Is there ANY party in Ukraine that can be called resembling NSDAP??? Obviously not. (but there IS... in Rusha).
We were talking about people who identify with the Nazi ideology. Not political parties "resembling NSDAP". There might be one in Russia. I am not familiar with Russian political parties. I'd have to borrow some knowledge from Google to confirm. I DO know, however, that there is no party "resembling NSDAP" in "Rusha". Because there is no country on planet earth called Rusha".
Qtard: Maybe there, in Ukraine there is somebody, anybody who pushing messainic imperialistic idea about rule over all World??? Obviouslu not. Ukraine is in the fight AGAINST such force.
Re, "Ukraine is in the fight AGAINST such force"... You are "Captian Obvious". I am (proven by other comments) on the side of Ukraine. Why I point out that Putin's claim that they needed to invade Ukraine to "deNazify" it is a lie. However, because I also acknowledge facts (unlike Qtard), I have no choice but to admit the fact that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis.
Qtard: Which trying to stick to opponent label of being "nazis". In all accordance with after WW2 precarious suggestion -- that "nazis of the future... will be calling themself anti-nazi".
Similar to how the White Supremacists Minus FJ and Qtard deny being White Supremacists. Even anti-White Supremacists.
Qtard: \\me: Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.\\ Hah... but you are ears deep in it.
I categorically reject it. Putin's claim that the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis is false.
Qtard: \\me: Qtard even falsely claimed that it is Democrats who are assisting Putin in spreading this propaganda.\\ Yap. That was spread via CNN, for example.
CNN never said the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis.
Qtard: That idea that there is any nazis in Ukraine. And that... that you repeat that BS -- more than damning evidance, here.
It is me acknowledging a "pointing to reality" fact.
Qtard: \\me: When it's republicans who are doing it.\\ And you are ready to provide factual example(s)??? Naah.
Yes. I did the last time this came up. You forgetting does not mean I didn't do it. Anyway, here is some "borrowed information" that confirms what I said...
(Article excerpt from The Guardian)... Led by Tucker Carlson at Fox News, a few Republican rightwingers in Congress, and some conservative activists, a spate of comments that have disparaged Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and echoed other Russian war disinformation have been recycled by Moscow. ... A feedback loop between the Kremlin and parts of the American right has been palpable since the war’s start in February, which Moscow falsely labeled as a "special military operation" aimed at stopping "genocide" of Russians in Ukraine and "denazification" – two patently bogus charges that drew widespread international criticism.
Qtard: \\Also fake lefties like Jimmy Dore, RFK Jr, and others (Minus FJ laughably calls this "intellectual integrity"). Don't care. Not my cup of tea.
Why not? These people are supposedly on the "Left". Don't you love criticising the Left? Or, could it be that these people hate Joe Biden and you like that about them? So won't ever criticize them?
Qtard: What "support of democrcy"??? That is when you said: "I *DO* deny..." them their rights??? Who could say such thing -- only totalitarian. And you NEVER tryed to disproove it. As EVEN you, heinous liar -- know that it's true. That's why you NEVER tryed to oppose it with facts and logic... and only trying to flood it all with verbal feces.
Qtard floods this blog with verbal feces. Like Bullshit about J6 sore losers having the "right" to overturn the results of the 2020 election using violence. A free and fair democratic election in which The People chose Joe Biden to lead the country. Qtard was FOR denying the rights of Joe Biden voters. Throwing out the results of a free and fair democratic election to install the LOSER of that election... how would that not be the END of democracy in America?
Qtard: Go disprove it... that you are nasty totalitarian... wannabe.
I have. By my strong support for democracy. And opposition to violence to change the results of an free and fair democratic election. Qtard is the one who needs to disprove that he isn't a totalitarian wannabe. Because all the evidence says he IS.
Qtard: Democracy -- that is constant change of those who can be a proxy to the power of WE, the People. That means, there is nothing like that "overthrow of democracy" can exist.
It can. If the J6 rioters had been successful and the loser donald tRump remained in power. That would have been an overthrow of democracy.
Qtard: Only USURPATION of Power -- that is what can happen.
Like there is any difference.
Qtard: But. We can use "overthrow" an par with "king, despot, autocrats". See... even words you are using is that of a totalitarian.
Overthrow, definition: "remove forcibly from power". What the J6 rioters tried to do. "Even words you are using is that of a totalitarian" is qtarded stupidity.
Qtard: \\me: lie about installing a dictator being a "joke" or "snarky comment"\\ Yep. Cause I know History. It's not so easy to "install a disctator".
Qtard: Are you that nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian, who think about people of use that bad -- that they want dictator??? Even that J6 rioters?
If you asked the J6 rioters they would tell you that they were fighting FOR democracy. That they were "stopping the steal" the usurper Biden was attempting. Most of the J6 rioters are useful idiots. Most tRump supporters are useful idiots. They think Biden stole the election and Biden is illegitimate. That does not change the fact that, had the J6 rioters been successful, it would have been a coup. And tRump, had he remained in power, would have attempted to seize additional powers. By (among other things) dismantling the so-called "deep state".
When "deep state" people are just career professionals and not (when tRump was president) participants in a "witch hunt" to thwart his agenda. As for ME being a "nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian", that's bullshit. I didn't support the mission of the J6 rioters, which was to stop the electoral college vote to confirm The People's choice for president, Joe Biden. WHY would I? I voted for Joe Biden. Qtard is a nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian that wishes the J6 rioters had been successful and donald tRump was still president.
Qtard: \\If you didn't care, you'd go away.\\ Here we again. With your totlitarian try to prescribe to other people -- what they must do.
Do whatever the hell you want. I don't give a crap.
Qtard: And you tryiong to say that you are NOT totalitarian???
I have no need to "try" I am something I am NOT. I strongly support democracy. EVERYTHING I have written here confirms this. My opposition to the overthrow of democracy by the J6 rioters. An overthrow of democracy by the usurper donald tRump that you have (and will continue to) argue vociferously in favor of. Proving that you are the totalitarian.
Qtard: But well, totalitarians, that lying scum, they DO NOT like to admit being totalitarian.
Of course. Why you continue to deny that you are a totalitarian. You are a lying scumbag.
Qtard: \\Like my opinion of donald tRump's guilt. Even though I can not influence any court decision.\\ You alone? Of course. That's why you admire totalitrain rule -- where'd there's be endless mobs of "likeminded" totalitarians, or thwarted to submit to totalitarians.
There aren't any. That is what YOU said. In another thread you wrote, "there is NO mob of idiots thiunking the same as you". Whatever LIE works at the moment. Even if the current lie contradicts prior lies. That's how pathological liars operate. Trait of a pathological liar confirmed.
Qtard: \\me: ... maybe you don't use "Q" any longer because you were embarrassed for being outed as a Trekkie?\\ Yet one time confirmed being a trekkie. Who can see capital "Q" ONLY as connection with ST narrative??
Qtard denies he is a Trekkie so strongly because it's true. Why he dropped the "Q". He got outed and it embarrassed him. Like I care Qtard's love for Star Trek.
Qtard: \\Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the...\\ No. Do not remember.
You cut off my quote... "Your strong support for the..." ends with "...overthrow of democracy in the US". You keep arguing in favor of it. Many times previously. And you will continue to argue in favor of it. That you do not remember is BULLSHIT.
Qtard: But... NO, I do not remember EVEN ONE time... when you'd (with basing it on facts and logic) would explain anything here.
Here you ADMIT you are a liar. You remember, but my explanations don't count. Because the explanations are not "with basing it on facts and logic". They will NEVER be. Not because that is true. But because that is the lie you will never depart from. Despite the absurdity of it.
Qtard: And to remember EVERY of your feces throwing, and to discern what it would mean from your delusional POV... naah, don't remember, and not inclined to.
Of course not. Because that would involve honest debate. And you are a dishonest feces thrower.
Qtard: Going by the street -- that is "use violence"? Or maybe coming into building into which free public access explicitly allowed -- that is "use violence"? Declaring their political stance and demand -- that is "use violence"?
"Going by the street" was not allowed. They had a permit to protest where donald tRump (and others) whipped them up. No violence yet, though. Entering of the Capitol? Yes. They used violence to accomplish that. Hand to hand combat with police outside the Capitol is definitely violence. It is a fact. Confirmed by pointing to reality. Absolutely denying Objective Reality -- YOU DID IT. You have written it.
Qtard: In totalitarian country like Rusha for example. Where they PROHIBIT to people all such ways to "use violence".
ACTUAL violence. Proven. On video. No "use of violence" in quotes.
Qtard: I was growing in an environment of Nasty Soviet Totalitarian Propaganda. Where they tryed to rub-in that nasty bullshit about "ukrainian nazis" and all such things. OF COURSE, I would know that words! Why YOU know em... go give YOUR reasons?
I need to have a reason to know what words me? I went to school. I read. I'm informed. Qtard says "OF COURSE, I would know that words"... but you spelled "Gestapo" wrong.
Qtard: \\me: Here Qtard wrote, "But, don't sweat it -- I will not report you. Maybe". Hah... and to whom??? Is there something like Gestapo in USA, already???
How should I know? You're the one who threatened me.
Qtard: \\And proof (either way) that Qtard is a totalitarian wannabe.\\ Hint. (I gwown bored of your dumbness)
I grow tired of Qtard's dumbness.
Qtard: To say something like "proof that" A is something-something. AT FIRST... you need to give GENERAL statment. Undeniably correct one. Not your wishi-washi wishfoool thinking blurts. Like. "All policemans on-duty wore uniform". Then and only than, you can say "this one A wear uniform of a policeman -- that is a PROOF that he is a policeman". LOGIC! That os how it works.
Qtard: \\Qtard and Minus FJ know the totalitarian playbook and deploy the tactics in it relentlessly. Accuse others...\\ AND??? How'd you know what in that "totalitarian playbook"???
Smartness.
Qtard: Than... give proofs.
I support democracy while Qtard supports the violent overthrow of democracy. I support for fair trials while Qtard calls says "fair trial, my ass".
Qtard: Why ONLY I are one who giving proofs here. Isn't that unfair -- to ask for proofs, but not provide em?
I've never see any "proof" from you.
Qtard: \\I support fair trials.\\ Yap. "Fair trials", while people being caled "guilty" long before em.
So what? You don't like people having opinions and expressing them? Except if they are in agreement with Qtard's opinion? Qtard is a dipshit. For sure. He thinks opinions are a reason to cancel trials. Set all people accused of crimes free. There are no laws anymore. UNLESS public agrees that NOBODY is to form an opinion about guilt of people accused of crimes. Which is, of course, impossible.
Qtard: VERY "fair". As in Nazi's Germany. Are you Jew? Then you are guilty. Go to... a camp of your choice: Dahau, or maybe Oswentsim, Aushwits? Good choice.
Qtarded stupidity. Jewish people weren't put on trial. They were just killed. For being Jewish, not for being accused of any crime.
Qtard: \\me: Qtard agrees but places quotation marks around "fair". Implying that I do not support fair trials, but sham trials that only appear to be fair. Which is a lie.\\ Well. Trials when it is defined BEFORE they started even who are guilty -- is a definition of sham trials. Yes.
But "defined BEFORE they started even who are guilty" isn't the case. Defendants are presumed innocent... by THE COURT. Public can think what they want. There is no way to even prevent people from forming opinions.
Qtard: Have something to oppose that? Would you DARE to oppose? To that LOGICAL conclusion.
Oppose what? Forbidding people from having opinions? Make having an opinion about the guilt or innocence of an accused person a thought crime? That is a completely illogical conclusion.
\\We were talking about people who identify with the Nazi ideology.
And what is "Nazi ideology"??? Without party that pushes it into reality. Without leaders. Without power.
\\There might be one in Russia. I am not familiar with Russian political parties
National-Bolshevicks for examples.
You can found on Youtube (if it not deleted yet), whole marches. With anti-semitic transparants. With giving nazi hailing.
Definitely NAZI.
But... you have a blind eye for Rusha nazis. You see nazis ONLY where there CANNOT be ones. Ukrainians have fought AGAINST BOTH -- Nazis and Commies!
While most of other countries was colluding with one or another, or both. (Like USA)
That's why there is NO END of liars who spread such a nasty rumors about UA.
\\Because there is no country on planet earth called Rusha".
You do not known what nickname mean???
Obviously, cause you are idiot. :-))))))))))))))
\\However, because I also acknowledge facts (unlike Qtard), I have no choice but to admit the fact that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis.
That is nasty poisonous propaganda that Rusha spread -- false equivalence between Nationalism === Nazism.
Why that is obvious lie -- Nazism that is SHORTCUT for national-SOCIALISM.
Well... and you prone to it, because YOUR Demn propaganda use it too. That false equivalence.
And as you are "honest" slurper of propaganda - there is no surprise of you believing to that shit.
\\Similar to how the White Supremacists Minus FJ and Qtard deny being White Supremacists. Even anti-White Supremacists.
So? Chinese ARE Supremacists, still??? :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\me: Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.\\ Hah... but you are ears deep in it.
\\I categorically reject it. Putin's claim that the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis is false.
But still... you admitted yourslf that you believe that "some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis."
That is Russian Propaganda poison it spread on the West.
You -- repeating that shit.
Means -- you are on the hook of Russian propaganda.
LOGIC!
And your "I categorically reject it" means only that you are hypocrite and liar. ;-P
Why?
Cause you doing that... but then, immediately, trying to deny that you are doing that.
And that is -- stupidiest of lies. ;-P
\\CNN never said the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis.
Cause CNN is proficient and DO NOT spead propaganda lies in such a blatant way. ;-P But still, you thing that there "some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis." That is ENOUGH evidance of success of their labourous work. ;-P
\\Qtard: That idea that there is any nazis in Ukraine. And that... that you repeat that BS -- more than damning evidance, here.
\\It is me acknowledging a "pointing to reality" fact.
Yeah. You do not know what "being nazi" is. Cannot discern when some lies poured into your ears. Admitting yourself that you know little about that part of the World. And even Google cannot help you.
But... you able to "discern Reality"... ough-yeah! :-))))))))))))))
\\(Article excerpt from The Guardian)... Led by Tucker Carlson at Fox News, a few Republican rightwingers in Congress, and some conservative activists, a spate of comments that have disparaged Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and echoed other Russian war disinformation have been recycled by Moscow.
Oh... I need to praise you. For giving excerpts.
That is honest and correct way of introducing some facts... ehm, some input, into discussion.
Well... it do not disprove my point -- that Demn-aligned media have spread such false narratives (about Ukrainians being nazis).
So... it's easy for me to admit -- that some of Reps just try to use that already incoroprated propaganda and spin it for their (nasty?) political motives.
Politics -- that is dirty loundry of any country, do you agree?
That's why I praise my non-involvmnet in your inner politica brawls... but you keep trying to mark me with your dirt. Shame on you. Shame on you. ;-P
\\Why not? These people are supposedly on the "Left". Don't you love criticising the Left? Or, could it be that these people hate Joe Biden and you like that about them? So won't ever criticize them?
Yawn.
Cause... I am foreigner, who are uninvolved in your inner political brawls.
Your Captain Obvious.
Even if I'd try to answer to that your questions -- I can't. Because there is NO base for me. To feel this way or another. About your Right, or your Left. Or whatever.
WHY that is SO DAMN hard for you to understand????
Apart from obvious hypothesis -- that you are banal idiot. ;-P
\\how would that not be the END of democracy in America?
How would it be?
If some other democratic government would be instantiated?
For THIS government and system it might be a problem... but why it should be problem for Democracy, ahh???
\\Because all the evidence says he IS.
1) Evidnces... it's just beliefs.
2) Like your belief that you provided ANY such evidances, even. ;-P
\\Qtard: Only USURPATION of Power -- that is what can happen.
Like there is any difference.
For totalitarian there would not be, for sure.
Are you totalitarian?
\\Overthrow, definition: "remove forcibly from power". What the J6 rioters tried to do.
Hah... but you yourself declared that Biden WAS NOT in power.
So, who they tryed to "remove forcibly from power"???
\\I didn't say it was easy. The J6 rioters failed.
So... how can you know that their goal was to "install dictator"???
\\If you asked the J6 rioters they would tell you that they were fighting FOR democracy. That they were "stopping the steal" the usurper Biden was attempting. Most of the J6 rioters are useful idiots.
Well... being idiot -- it is not a crime, isn't it?
\\Do whatever the hell you want. I don't give a crap.
Except in that time you couldn't help it to cry "go away!"? ;-P
\\I strongly support democracy.
Well... your own version of what "democracy" mean.
Well... not like it anything wrong, under Democracy all kind of views are allowed and protected... ONLY, while that is ONLY views...
\\Of course. Why you continue to deny that you are a totalitarian. You are a lying scumbag.
Obviously... that is what totalitarian would say... to cover for his own totalitarian essence. ;-P
\\Even if the current lie contradicts prior lies. That's how pathological liars operate. Trait of a pathological liar confirmed.
Yeah. You confirmed that you are pathological liar. With this your illogical and not supported by any facts (quotes, quotes) try to twist and subvert my based on facts and logic words. ;-P
\\Qtard denies he is a Trekkie so strongly because it's true.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the...\\ No. Do not remember.
\\You cut off my quote... "Your strong support for the..." ends with "...overthrow of democracy in the US". You keep arguing in favor of it. Many times previously. And you will continue to argue in favor of it. That you do not remember is BULLSHIT.
WAT???
I am not responsible for wirlwinds in your brain.
DARE to PRESENT your arguments in straightforward WAY:
1) FACTS (quotes here) you wanna base your claims on.
2) PREMICES -- how that FACTS related to anything you wanna prove.
3) LOGICAL base -- like some simple and undenyably true GENERAL statement.
4) CORRECT logical inference -- that show LOGICALLY how that square FACTS fall into that round holes, flawlessly. ;-P
\\You remember, but my explanations don't count. Because the explanations are not "with basing it on facts and logic".
Yap.
You gotcha.
As your claims are not logical. Well, illogical. And mostly merely are wishful whimsical BS. IT is hard, and there is NO reason for me to remember every damn your verbal spewing. ;-P
Again, You gotcha.
Go learn how to present your arguments logically (by example above or... you can find a help with Google, ask "How to use Logic in a discussion?" or whatever).
Or... continue confirming being a losy idiot. ;-P
\\honest debate
Ha... :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
From your mouth, it sounds... even blashemious.
But, do I care??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\"Going by the street" was not allowed. They had a permit to protest where donald tRump (and others) whipped them up. No violence yet, though. Entering of the Capitol? Yes. They used violence to accomplish that. Hand to hand combat with police outside the Capitol is definitely violence. It is a fact. Confirmed by pointing to reality. Absolutely denying Objective Reality -- YOU DID IT. You have written it.
Dunno.
I'd leave it to your Legal System to decide -- who was at fault and for what.
Because I believe it is democratic enough for that.
And are you???
Well... that is YOUR inner political brawls, I like to admit being NOT involved into. ;-P
\\How should I know? You're the one who threatened me.
With a joke??? You saw through in a jiffy?
Are you totalitarian -- to beware of jokes???
Or just an idiot, who do not understand humor? ;-P
\\Qtard confirms that he has no idea how logic works. Wearing a policeman's uniform doesn't make someone a policeman. A non-policeman can wear a policeman's uniform.
That's it.
NOT ALL general statements are correct.
Like your cyrcular reasoning "I am democrat... cause I support democracy". ;-P
That is the same as with this police uniform example.
\\Smartness.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Than... give proofs.
\\I support democracy while Qtard supports the violent overthrow of democracy. I support for fair trials while Qtard calls says "fair trial, my ass".
But that is... not proofs.
IT HAVE NO structure of proof. There is no links with Reality given.
Ergo. That is just some random baseless statments.
Yawn.
Wishi-washi name-calling. ;-P
\\I've never see any "proof" from you.
So what?
You showed that you UNABLE to see A FACT even.
EVEN when that is YOUR OWN DAMN words... :-)))))))))))))))))
That makes it NOT surprising -- that your (apparently honest, congrats) self-revelation -- that you cannot see based on facts and logic proofs. ;-P
That's... quite natural.
\\There are no laws anymore. UNLESS public agrees that NOBODY is to form an opinion about guilt of people accused of crimes. Which is, of course, impossible.
Well... that would be Ideal World.
But this world NOT ideal one. For sure.
So, what was your question, again? ;-P
\\Qtarded stupidity. Jewish people weren't put on trial. They were just killed.
YAP.
You gotcha.
Because WHY they need to be put on trial -- when it was declared that they are appatently are guilty.
That is why NAZI regime was criminal and deeply UNdemocratic.
That's why... honing Presumption of Innocence and preserving Human Rights is SO DARN important... to not becam like that nazis.
Do YOU get it????
Or not, because you are such a totalitarian... wannabe? ;-P
\\Public can think what they want. There is no way to even prevent people from forming opinions.
Pfft!
The same as in Nazi Germany???
Public have had opinion that "all Jews are criminals". And therefore courts was ready to persecute em (cause, courts are NOT separated from general public. They follow that mood most of the people have). And then, as that idea became wide spread (see, even COURTS confirm, that all Jews are scum). That need to preserve their Human Rights, even if by the mean of sham trial, was postoponed at all... because "Public can think what they want."
Aren't you talking about Kekistan? I've never even visited.
Perhaps Qtardia?
"Nazis" in Qtardia are people who believe donald tRump HAS to be presumed innocent (by the court) and MUST receive a fair trial. Even if they personally have the opinion that donald tRump is guilty.
Perhaps i was too generous, granting Dervy two-dimensions. The founder of the New Left, Herbert Marcuse wrote "One Dimensional Man". And yes, it was a book about Dervy!
The same as in Nazi America??? Public have had opinion that "all donald tRumps are criminals". And therefore courts are ready to persecute them.
Naaah. If there is anyone else so unfortunate as to be named "Donald Trump", I wouldn't hold it against him. Heck, I'd even say that, if they wanted to legally change their name, they should be able to do so... free of charge.
43 comments:
You're anticipating dotard exacting retribution with glee, aren't you? donald tRump has to get back in the White House first, Minus. There will be no 2nd term tRump agenda unless there is a tRump second term. Is he going to run from prison?
Comey lied under oath? Video states it as a fact. But it's an allegation made by dotard donald. Even IF tRump were president, James Comey would have rights. tRump also said he was going to have HRC locked up in his first term? Did that happen, Minus?
Is tRump (in a hypothetical second term) going to be a dictator who can imprison people on his say-so? That is what you want, right? Not a tRump second term as president of the United States, but for dotard donald to be installed as American dictator.
Donald Trump, President for Life. I like the sound of that.
Seeking for a thought crimes, ah, De-Ru-Pi??? To report to Something-Something-Gaspacho??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))
I was asked how Ukrainians can preserve democracy during the war?
Ukrainians do not need to preserve or somehow protect democracy. Ukrainians are democracy.
We, Ukrainians, are the ones in whose veins genuine national democracy flows. It is the democracy that destroys the walls of regimes and breaks through the iron curtains of dictatorship and gives life to the new and free.
Do you want to argue? Do you know who Ukrainians are?
Ukrainians are the descendants of soldiers who called their army "brotherhood". These are the descendants of those who were among the first to draw up the first Constitution in the world. Descendants of those who elected their leaders and Hetmans by voting. Descendants of those who overcame the strongest regime in the world. Ukrainian democracy is elusive. It cannot be killed or banned. It is impossible to starve. It is transmitted with blood and absorbed with mother's milk. In my life, I experienced several people's revolutions, then ATO, and finally - a full-scale war with a front (duration) longer than the Second World War. And you know what? I constantly see the spirit of Ukrainian democracy, the spirit of the Ukrainian people's revolution."
Qtard: Seeking for a thought crimes, ah, De-Ru-Pi??? To report to Something-Something-Gaspacho?
Qtard ignores Minus FJ's stated desire to bring totalitarianism to the United States in the form of a "president for life". With (again) false charges against me. Why? I think because he likes Minus FJ's idea of tRump being "president for life". Qtard just outed himself (again) as a totalitarian wannabe.
Also... "Gaspacho" (aka Gazpacho)?? LOL! Are you a Marjorie Taylor Greene fan? She is also an FM (like you) who confused cold soup with Hitler's secret police (aka Gestapo).
\\Qtard ignores Minus FJ's stated desire to bring totalitarianism to the United States in the form of a "president for life".
Do I have a reason to NOT think that that is merely a joke???
\\With (again) false charges against me. Why?
Cause... your behavior -- very consistent. ;-P
With definition of a totalitarian wannabe. Which I observe and confirm here. With facts. For a half a year, already.
So??? What is more solid reason for a confidence? Just one snarky comment? OR. Half a year of transparent and stubborn behavior?
\\I think because he likes Minus FJ's idea of tRump being "president for life".
I. Don't care. And. Have no play in this game -- how'd I could influence that choice??? While being just a miserly foreigner, who lurking as anonimous.
\\Qtard just outed himself (again) as a totalitarian wannabe.
And you can EXPLAIN??? How that "Qtard just outed himself (again)" can have ANY meaningful corespondence with Reality?
Naah. You can't. My little mexiCAN'T :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Also... "Gaspacho" (aka Gazpacho)?? LOL! Are you a Marjorie Taylor Greene fan? She is also an FM (like you) who confused cold soup with Hitler's secret police (aka Gestapo).
Ough... so that was Ge? Ghe.. staPo???
Ough... you are obviously totalitarian wannabe -- you know all such totalitarian words so perfectly. Maybe because you LOVE em, so much?
SEE. I can use your idiotic non-logic on you too. :-))))))))))))))
Cause I THAT smart (for at least).
But YOU -- cannot use MY logic against me.
Cause you are THAT dumb. Unredeamable. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Do I have a reason to NOT think that that is merely a joke???
Absolutely not. Because believing that Minus FJ isn't an OBVIOUS totalitarian (contrary to the voluminous evidence) would run counter to your false and fact-free narrative that I (a strong supporter of democracy) am actually a totalitarian.
Just call it a "joke". Like the Ukrainian soldier who admitted to being a Nazi. Qtard says he was "joking". That the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis and Putin invaded to "denazify" is categorically false. However, that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis is true. Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.
Qtard even falsely claimed that it is Democrats who are assisting Putin in spreading this propaganda. When it's republicans who are doing it. Also fake lefties like Jimmy Dore, RFK Jr, and others (Minus FJ laughably calls this "intellectual integrity").
Qtard: Cause... your behavior -- very consistent. With definition of a totalitarian wannabe. Which I observe and confirm here. With facts. For a half a year, already.
Self evident lie. Given my strong support for democracy. And being against its overthrow. While you (with your support for the J6 rioters) strongly support American transitioning to a totalitarian state via the installation of donald tRump as dictator-for-life (NOT a Minus FJ "joke"). Proof that it is YOUR behavior is very consistent with the definition of a totalitarian wannabe.
Qtard: So??? What is more solid reason for a confidence? Just one snarky comment? OR. Half a year of transparent and stubborn behavior?
Yup. I stubbornly support democracy. And I stubbornly oppose it's overthrow. While Minus with his "snarky comment" and you (with your lies about J6 rioters exercising their "right" to overthrow US democracy and lie about installing a dictator being a "joke" or "snarky comment") are stubborn totalitarians.
Qtard: I. Don't care. And. Have no play in this game -- how'd I could influence that choice??? While being just a miserly foreigner, who lurking as anonimous.
If you didn't care, you'd go away. As opposed to commenting on things you SAY you "don't care" about. People can have opinions on things they can't influence. Like my opinion of donald tRump's guilt. Even though I can not influence any court decision. Or even influence whether or not charges are brought.
As for "lurking as anonimous", is that why you don't enter "Q" when making your comments any longer? Or... maybe you don't use "Q" any longer because you were embarrassed for being outed as a Trekkie?
Qtard: \\Qtard just outed himself (again) as a totalitarian wannabe.\\ And you can EXPLAIN???
Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the overthrow of democracy in the US. Proven by your unending defense the J6 rioters. And insistence that they had a right to use violence to change the results of a free and fair election. Only because they are sore losers.
Also your unending defense of the dictator-wannabe donald tRump and unending denials of his obvious collusion with Putin to steal the 2020 election from Hillary Clinton and turn America into a totalitarian state. One were political opponents are locked up. ENDORSED by Minus FJ in this very post. A persecutory prosecution of James Comey because he refused to pledge loyalty to dotard donald.
Qtard: you know all such totalitarian words so perfectly. Maybe because you LOVE em, so much?
Qtard knows them too. Even though Qtard (a la MTG) used "Gaspacho" when he meant "Gestapo". Explanation? Qtard loves them so much. Why he suggested that he would turn me in to the "Gestapo". Here Qtard wrote, "But, don't sweat it -- I will not report you. Maybe".
For the thought crime of opposing the overthrow of democracy. As if that would work. I'd be arrested for AGREEING with the decision of Merrick Garland to prosecute the J6 rioters? If Qtard says this was a "joke"? It was a "joke" an FM would make. And proof (either way) that Qtard is a totalitarian wannabe.
Qtard and Minus FJ know the totalitarian playbook and deploy the tactics in it relentlessly. Accuse others of what they are guilty of. Like Democrats being the "real" racists. Something Qtard JUST did. Here Qtard slandered me with a false claim that a comment I made was, kinda like "I dispise racism... and nigers". This is FALSE. I despise racism and White Supremacists. People like Minus FJ and Qtard.
And (of course) his unending false accusations that I am a "totalitarian wannabe". When this is provably false. I support fair trials. Qtard agrees but places quotation marks around "fair". Implying that I do not support fair trials, but sham trials that only appear to be fair. Which is a lie.
Qtard: Cause I THAT smart (for at least). But YOU -- cannot use MY logic against me.
It isn't that I can NOT, but that I WILL not. Because I am honest. I won't use YOUR dishonest "logic". "Logic" that includes lying and playing FM games. Deny what you've said and ask for quotes. Then say I don't give quotes (after I do) or say (falsely) that the quote is "not correct" (when YOU quote ME incorrectly).
Also accuse me of what you are guilty of (being a totalitarian wannabe), (laughably) claim that you're right because you cite facts that "point to reality", while facts I provide are "Demn propaganda" and "bullshit" and don't "point to reality", (laughably) claim that you use logic and give evidence while I don't (despite the fact that I DO). And other dishonest tactics I'm probably forgetting.
Because YOU are irredeemably dishonest and dumb.
\\Because believing that Minus FJ isn't an OBVIOUS totalitarian (contrary to the voluminous evidence)
WHAT "voluminous evidence"???????????????!!!
JUST ONE comment we discussing here?
Dare to give examples of more???
Naah.
Cause that'll reveal your lies.
So, you'd try to squint, derail and flood that question with feces.
Because you are FEARING FACTS totalitarian. ;-P
\\ would run counter to your false and fact-free narrative that I (a strong supporter of democracy) am actually a totalitarian.
Yap.
YET ONE trait of totalitarian confirmed -- that is all "narratives" for totalitarian -- that is the way they twist, derail and thwart the Truth.
See. Voluminous evidences!
In almost EVERY your coment here.
And in YOUR denial... that you DID that comment. Even if it JUST PREVIOUS one.
You trying to "make believe" that it mean something else. And that how you pushing totalitarian agenda, like about "people *not* have their human rights" and etc. ;-P
\\Just call it a "joke". Like the Ukrainian soldier who admitted to being a Nazi. Qtard says he was "joking".
That is... liliPut's Poisonous Totalitarian Propaganda.
And why I am NOT surprised that you rised this flag too. ;-P
\\However, that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis is true.
That's absolutly counter-factual (almost) century old totalitarian bullshit -- devised by Stalin to call ALL people that oppose Communistic Plague -- a nazi.
Trying to rub in false equivalence Nationalism == national-SOCIALISTIC imperialism.
While. Who is nazis??? Really. That is memebers of national-SOCIALISTIC party of Germany.
Can Ukrainian soldier be a member of NSDAP??? Obviously not.
Is there ANY party in Ukraine that can be called resembling NSDAP??? Obviously not. (but there IS... in Rusha)
Maybe there, in Ukraine there is somebody, anybody who pushing messainic imperialistic idea about rule over all World??? Obviouslu not. Ukraine is in the fight AGAINST such force.
Which trying to stick to opponent label of being "nazis". In all accordance with after WW2 precarious suggestion -- that "nazis of the future... will be calling themself anti-nazi".
\\Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.
Hah... but you are ears deep in it. ;-P
\\Qtard even falsely claimed that it is Democrats who are assisting Putin in spreading this propaganda.
Yap.
That was spread via CNN, for example. That idea that there is any nazis in Ukraine. And that... that you repeat that BS -- more than damning evidance, here.
\\When it's republicans who are doing it.
And you are ready to provide factual example(s)???
Naah.
\\Also fake lefties like Jimmy Dore, RFK Jr, and others (Minus FJ laughably calls this "intellectual integrity").
Don't care. Not my cup of tea. ;-P
\\Qtard: Cause... your behavior -- very consistent. With definition of a totalitarian wannabe. Which I observe and confirm here. With facts. For a half a year, already.
\\Self evident lie. Given my strong support for democracy.
What "support of democrcy"??? That is when you said: "I *DO* deny..." them their rights??? ;-P
Who could say such thing -- only totalitarian. And you NEVER tryed to disproove it. As EVEN you, heinous liar -- know that it's true. That's why you NEVER tryed to oppose it with facts and logic... and only trying to flood it all with verbal feces. ;-P
Like here. Where you rised AGAIN. And without ANY apparent connection with talks here. That nasty smelly question of nazism.
Just for one thing -- to produce MORE verbal manure.
EXACTLY what totalitarian would do... and actuslly doing, like liliPut JUST NOW, who blowed a dam... and trying to rub in homericly false idea -- that Ukrainains themself did it.
THERE IS NO lie... to which totalitarian would not fall... to push his nasty ideas and narratives.
And that is -- what YOU doing. Here.
Go disprove it... that you are nasty totalitarian... wannabe.
\\Yup. I stubbornly support democracy. And I stubbornly oppose it's overthrow.
Democracy -- that is constant change of those who can be a proxy to the power of WE, the People.
That means, there is nothing like that "overthrow of democracy" can exist.
Only USURPATION of Power -- that is what can happen.
But. We can use "overthrow" an par with "king, despot, autocrats".
See... even words you are using is that of a totalitarian. ;-P
\\lie about installing a dictator being a "joke" or "snarky comment"
Yep.
Cause I know History.
It's not so easy to "install a disctator".
People themself MUST want it.
Are you that nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian, who think about people of use that bad -- that they want dictator??? Even that J6 rioters? ;-P
\\If you didn't care, you'd go away.
Here we again. With your totlitarian try to prescribe to other people -- what they must do. ;-P
And you tryiong to say that you are NOT totalitarian???
But well, totalitarians, that lying scum, they DO NOT like to admit being totalitarian.
So, that is just another resemblance trait confirmed. ;-P
\\Like my opinion of donald tRump's guilt. Even though I can not influence any court decision.
You alone? Of course.
That's why you admire totalitrain rule -- where'd there's be endless mobs of "likeminded" totalitarians, or thwarted to submit to totalitarians...
\\As for "lurking as anonimous", is that why you don't enter "Q" when making your comments any longer?
Yap. Unneeded courtesy. And waste of time.
\\Or... maybe you don't use "Q" any longer because you were embarrassed for being outed as a Trekkie?
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Yet one time confirmed being a trekkie. Who can see capital "Q" ONLY as connection with ST narrative???
And not as just most left latter key on keyboard. Or, whatever.
\\Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the
No. Do not remember.
Where was that... EVEN ONE damn time. When you did explained something.
About your own words.
There was explanations about HRC. Or that TV judge.
But... NO, I do not remember EVEN ONE time... when you'd (with basing it on facts and logic) would explain anything here.
And to remember EVERY of your feces throwing, and to discern what it would mean from your delusional POV... :-))))))))))))))) naah, don't remember, and not inclined to. ;-P
\\And insistence that they had a right to use violence to change the results of a free and fair election.
Going by the street -- that is "use violence"?
Or maybe coming into building into which free public access explicitly allowed -- that is "use violence"?
Declaring their political stance and demand -- that is "use violence"?
YEP. THAT IS.
In totalitarian country like Rusha for example.
Where they PROHIBIT to people all such ways to "use violence". ;-P
\\Qtard knows them too. Even though Qtard (a la MTG) used "Gaspacho" when he meant "Gestapo". Explanation? Qtard loves them so much.
Naah.
I was growing in an environment of Nasty Soviet Totalitarian Propaganda.
Where they tryed to rub-in that nasty bullshit about "ukrainian nazis" and all such things.
OF COURSE, I would know that words!
Why YOU know em... go give YOUR reasons? ;-P
\\Here Qtard wrote, "But, don't sweat it -- I will not report you. Maybe".
Hah... and to whom??? :-)))))
Is there something like Gestapo in USA, already???
\\And proof (either way) that Qtard is a totalitarian wannabe.
Hint. (I gwown bored of your dumbness)
To say something like "proof that" A is something-something.
AT FIRST... you need to give GENERAL statment. Undeniably correct one. Not your wishi-washi wishfoool thinking blurts.
Like. "All policemans on-duty wore uniform".
Then and only than, you can say "this one A wear uniform of a policeman -- that is a PROOF that he is a policeman".
LOGIC!
That os how it works. ;-P
\\Qtard and Minus FJ know the totalitarian playbook and deploy the tactics in it relentlessly. Accuse others...
AND??? How'd you know what in that "totalitarian playbook"??? ;-P
If you are NOT totalitarian?
And well... isn't that WHAT YOU doing... all of the time. "Accuse others". Like calling other liar... while lying yopurself. ;-P
\\And (of course) his unending false accusations that I am a "totalitarian wannabe". When this is provably false.
Than... give proofs. ;-P
Why ONLY I are one who giving proofs here. Isn't that unfair -- to ask for proofs, but not provide em?
\\I support fair trials.
Yap. "Fair trials", while people being caled "guilty" long before em. ;-P
VERY "fair". As in Nazi's Germany. Are you Jew? Then you are guilty. Go to... a camp of your choice: Dahau, or maybe Oswentsim, Aushwits? Good choice.
\\Qtard agrees but places quotation marks around "fair". Implying that I do not support fair trials, but sham trials that only appear to be fair. Which is a lie.
Well. Trials when it is defined BEFORE they started even who are guilty -- is a definition of sham trials. Yes.
Have something to oppose that?
Would you DARE to oppose?
To that LOGICAL conclusion. ;-P
\\It isn't that I can NOT, but that I WILL not. Because I am honest.
Yap. Especially when you screaming "I didn't SAID THAT"... to provingly YOUR OWN WORDS!!! Like "I *DO* deny...."
THAT IS... honesty???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Funny one. NOT. :-(
Millions of people do die... because of SUCH "honesty".
\\I won't use YOUR dishonest "logic".
Yap.
Liars DO FEAR and dispise Honest Logic of Aristotle. ;-P
For a more then 2000 years ALREADY!
With this. It's confirmed. Proved even. That you are -- relentlessly militant heinous LIAR.
Liar-liar, pents on fire. ;-P
\\Because YOU are irredeemably dishonest and dumb.
That's why you have such a big problems with basing your miserly basless claims ON FACTS???
Yap.
I gotcha. FACTS -- that is what hinders such a "honest" and "smart" ... as you.
Qtard: \\me: Because believing that Minus FJ isn't an OBVIOUS totalitarian (contrary to the voluminous evidence)\\ WHAT "voluminous evidence"??!!!
This entire blog. All dedicated to the totalitarian donald tRump.
Qtard: So, you'd try to squint, derail and flood that question with feces. Because you are FEARING FACTS totalitarian.
I won't. I'm not. Qtard fears facts.
Qtard: YET ONE trait of totalitarian confirmed -- that is all "narratives" for totalitarian -- that is the way they twist, derail and thwart the Truth.
Narratives can be built using lies. Narratives can be built using truth and facts. You assume that "narrative" means lies because those are the narratives you (as a totalitarian) like. Like your narrative that tRump is innocent because he has not been charged in court. Or, if he isn't being charged it is because Democrats are protecting him. That is a false narrative. The true narrative is that prosecuting a former president is difficult. Especially when an entire party is corrupt and protecting him (republicans). Republicans didn't protect Nixon. Why he left office. While tRump could be president again.
Qtard: See. Voluminous evidences! In almost EVERY your coment here.
I don't see. Because your claim is false.
Qtard: And in YOUR denial... that you DID that comment. Even if it JUST PREVIOUS one.
I don't know what "that comment" is. A comment Qtard faked and I never made? Yes, I will deny that comment. A comment I actually made but for which Qtard makes up "what I really meant"? I won't deny the comment, but I WILL deny the meaning that Qtard made up.
Qtard: You trying to "make believe" that it mean something else.
Qtard "makes believe" that it means something else.
Qtard: And that how you pushing totalitarian agenda, like about "people *not* have their human rights" and etc.
Like this one. Qtard makes believe I said "people *not* have their human rights". People DO have their human rights. Always. Sore losers violently attacking the Capitol to reverse the results of a free and fair democratic election -- NOT a "human right".
Qtard: \\me: Just call it a "joke". Like the Ukrainian soldier who admitted to being a Nazi. Qtard says he was "joking".\\ That is... liliPut's Poisonous Totalitarian Propaganda.
It isn't. That the Ukranian government is overrun with Nazis and that Russia needed to invade to "deNazify" Ukraine is Putin's propaganda. Not that a small minority of Ukranian soldiers self-idenity as Nazis.
Qtard: And why I am NOT surprised that you rised this flag too.
You aren't surprised that I tell the truth? I thought it was your contention that I am a "heinous liar"?
Qtard: \\me: However, that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis is true.\\ That's absolutly counter-factual (almost) century old totalitarian bullshit -- devised by Stalin to call ALL people that oppose Communistic Plague -- a nazi.
It is objective truth. A "pointing to reality" fact. That a SMALL minority of Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis. Not that "ALL people that oppose Communistic Plague -- a nazi". A small minority is far less than ALL. Qtard tries to conflat my pointing to reality with propaganda because he is a heinous liar.
Qtard: Can Ukrainian soldier be a member of NSDAP??? Obviously not.
The NSDAP only existed between 1920 and 1945. NOBODY can be a member because it no longer exists. We were talking about people who identify with Nazi ideology.
Qtard: Is there ANY party in Ukraine that can be called resembling NSDAP??? Obviously not. (but there IS... in Rusha).
We were talking about people who identify with the Nazi ideology. Not political parties "resembling NSDAP". There might be one in Russia. I am not familiar with Russian political parties. I'd have to borrow some knowledge from Google to confirm. I DO know, however, that there is no party "resembling NSDAP" in "Rusha". Because there is no country on planet earth called Rusha".
Qtard: Maybe there, in Ukraine there is somebody, anybody who pushing messainic imperialistic idea about rule over all World??? Obviouslu not. Ukraine is in the fight AGAINST such force.
Re, "Ukraine is in the fight AGAINST such force"... You are "Captian Obvious". I am (proven by other comments) on the side of Ukraine. Why I point out that Putin's claim that they needed to invade Ukraine to "deNazify" it is a lie. However, because I also acknowledge facts (unlike Qtard), I have no choice but to admit the fact that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis.
Qtard: Which trying to stick to opponent label of being "nazis". In all accordance with after WW2 precarious suggestion -- that "nazis of the future... will be calling themself anti-nazi".
Similar to how the White Supremacists Minus FJ and Qtard deny being White Supremacists. Even anti-White Supremacists.
Qtard: \\me: Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.\\ Hah... but you are ears deep in it.
I categorically reject it. Putin's claim that the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis is false.
Qtard: \\me: Qtard even falsely claimed that it is Democrats who are assisting Putin in spreading this propaganda.\\ Yap. That was spread via CNN, for example.
CNN never said the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis.
Qtard: That idea that there is any nazis in Ukraine. And that... that you repeat that BS -- more than damning evidance, here.
It is me acknowledging a "pointing to reality" fact.
Qtard: \\me: When it's republicans who are doing it.\\ And you are ready to provide factual example(s)??? Naah.
Yes. I did the last time this came up. You forgetting does not mean I didn't do it. Anyway, here is some "borrowed information" that confirms what I said...
US rightwing figures in step with Kremlin over Ukraine disinformation.
(Article excerpt from The Guardian)... Led by Tucker Carlson at Fox News, a few Republican rightwingers in Congress, and some conservative activists, a spate of comments that have disparaged Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and echoed other Russian war disinformation have been recycled by Moscow. ... A feedback loop between the Kremlin and parts of the American right has been palpable since the war’s start in February, which Moscow falsely labeled as a "special military operation" aimed at stopping "genocide" of Russians in Ukraine and "denazification" – two patently bogus charges that drew widespread international criticism.
Qtard: \\Also fake lefties like Jimmy Dore, RFK Jr, and others (Minus FJ laughably calls this "intellectual integrity"). Don't care. Not my cup of tea.
Why not? These people are supposedly on the "Left". Don't you love criticising the Left? Or, could it be that these people hate Joe Biden and you like that about them? So won't ever criticize them?
Qtard: What "support of democrcy"??? That is when you said: "I *DO* deny..." them their rights??? Who could say such thing -- only totalitarian. And you NEVER tryed to disproove it. As EVEN you, heinous liar -- know that it's true. That's why you NEVER tryed to oppose it with facts and logic... and only trying to flood it all with verbal feces.
Qtard floods this blog with verbal feces. Like Bullshit about J6 sore losers having the "right" to overturn the results of the 2020 election using violence. A free and fair democratic election in which The People chose Joe Biden to lead the country. Qtard was FOR denying the rights of Joe Biden voters. Throwing out the results of a free and fair democratic election to install the LOSER of that election... how would that not be the END of democracy in America?
Qtard: Go disprove it... that you are nasty totalitarian... wannabe.
I have. By my strong support for democracy. And opposition to violence to change the results of an free and fair democratic election. Qtard is the one who needs to disprove that he isn't a totalitarian wannabe. Because all the evidence says he IS.
Qtard: Democracy -- that is constant change of those who can be a proxy to the power of WE, the People. That means, there is nothing like that "overthrow of democracy" can exist.
It can. If the J6 rioters had been successful and the loser donald tRump remained in power. That would have been an overthrow of democracy.
Qtard: Only USURPATION of Power -- that is what can happen.
Like there is any difference.
Qtard: But. We can use "overthrow" an par with "king, despot, autocrats". See... even words you are using is that of a totalitarian.
Overthrow, definition: "remove forcibly from power". What the J6 rioters tried to do. "Even words you are using is that of a totalitarian" is qtarded stupidity.
Qtard: \\me: lie about installing a dictator being a "joke" or "snarky comment"\\ Yep. Cause I know History. It's not so easy to "install a disctator".
I didn't say it was easy. The J6 rioters failed.
Qtard: People themself MUST want it..
They DON'T. Why a majority voted for Joe Biden. And most of those who voted for tRump didn't want a dictator either. Why only 27 percent Republicans approve of Jan. 6 rioters".
Qtard: Are you that nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian, who think about people of use that bad -- that they want dictator??? Even that J6 rioters?
If you asked the J6 rioters they would tell you that they were fighting FOR democracy. That they were "stopping the steal" the usurper Biden was attempting. Most of the J6 rioters are useful idiots. Most tRump supporters are useful idiots. They think Biden stole the election and Biden is illegitimate. That does not change the fact that, had the J6 rioters been successful, it would have been a coup. And tRump, had he remained in power, would have attempted to seize additional powers. By (among other things) dismantling the so-called "deep state".
When "deep state" people are just career professionals and not (when tRump was president) participants in a "witch hunt" to thwart his agenda. As for ME being a "nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian", that's bullshit. I didn't support the mission of the J6 rioters, which was to stop the electoral college vote to confirm The People's choice for president, Joe Biden. WHY would I? I voted for Joe Biden. Qtard is a nasty-nasty-delusional totalitarian that wishes the J6 rioters had been successful and donald tRump was still president.
Qtard: \\If you didn't care, you'd go away.\\ Here we again. With your totlitarian try to prescribe to other people -- what they must do.
Do whatever the hell you want. I don't give a crap.
Qtard: And you tryiong to say that you are NOT totalitarian???
I have no need to "try" I am something I am NOT. I strongly support democracy. EVERYTHING I have written here confirms this. My opposition to the overthrow of democracy by the J6 rioters. An overthrow of democracy by the usurper donald tRump that you have (and will continue to) argue vociferously in favor of. Proving that you are the totalitarian.
Qtard: But well, totalitarians, that lying scum, they DO NOT like to admit being totalitarian.
Of course. Why you continue to deny that you are a totalitarian. You are a lying scumbag.
Qtard: \\Like my opinion of donald tRump's guilt. Even though I can not influence any court decision.\\ You alone? Of course. That's why you admire totalitrain rule -- where'd there's be endless mobs of "likeminded" totalitarians, or thwarted to submit to totalitarians.
There aren't any. That is what YOU said. In another thread you wrote, "there is NO mob of idiots thiunking the same as you". Whatever LIE works at the moment. Even if the current lie contradicts prior lies. That's how pathological liars operate. Trait of a pathological liar confirmed.
Qtard: \\me: ... maybe you don't use "Q" any longer because you were embarrassed for being outed as a Trekkie?\\ Yet one time confirmed being a trekkie. Who can see capital "Q" ONLY as connection with ST narrative??
Qtard denies he is a Trekkie so strongly because it's true. Why he dropped the "Q". He got outed and it embarrassed him. Like I care Qtard's love for Star Trek.
Qtard: \\Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the...\\ No. Do not remember.
You cut off my quote... "Your strong support for the..." ends with "...overthrow of democracy in the US". You keep arguing in favor of it. Many times previously. And you will continue to argue in favor of it. That you do not remember is BULLSHIT.
Qtard: But... NO, I do not remember EVEN ONE time... when you'd (with basing it on facts and logic) would explain anything here.
Here you ADMIT you are a liar. You remember, but my explanations don't count. Because the explanations are not "with basing it on facts and logic". They will NEVER be. Not because that is true. But because that is the lie you will never depart from. Despite the absurdity of it.
Qtard: And to remember EVERY of your feces throwing, and to discern what it would mean from your delusional POV... naah, don't remember, and not inclined to.
Of course not. Because that would involve honest debate. And you are a dishonest feces thrower.
Qtard: Going by the street -- that is "use violence"? Or maybe coming into building into which free public access explicitly allowed -- that is "use violence"? Declaring their political stance and demand -- that is "use violence"?
"Going by the street" was not allowed. They had a permit to protest where donald tRump (and others) whipped them up. No violence yet, though. Entering of the Capitol? Yes. They used violence to accomplish that. Hand to hand combat with police outside the Capitol is definitely violence. It is a fact. Confirmed by pointing to reality. Absolutely denying Objective Reality -- YOU DID IT. You have written it.
Qtard: In totalitarian country like Rusha for example. Where they PROHIBIT to people all such ways to "use violence".
ACTUAL violence. Proven. On video. No "use of violence" in quotes.
Qtard: I was growing in an environment of Nasty Soviet Totalitarian Propaganda. Where they tryed to rub-in that nasty bullshit about "ukrainian nazis" and all such things. OF COURSE, I would know that words! Why YOU know em... go give YOUR reasons?
I need to have a reason to know what words me? I went to school. I read. I'm informed. Qtard says "OF COURSE, I would know that words"... but you spelled "Gestapo" wrong.
Qtard: \\me: Here Qtard wrote, "But, don't sweat it -- I will not report you. Maybe". Hah... and to whom??? Is there something like Gestapo in USA, already???
How should I know? You're the one who threatened me.
Qtard: \\And proof (either way) that Qtard is a totalitarian wannabe.\\ Hint. (I gwown bored of your dumbness)
I grow tired of Qtard's dumbness.
Qtard: To say something like "proof that" A is something-something. AT FIRST... you need to give GENERAL statment. Undeniably correct one. Not your wishi-washi wishfoool thinking blurts. Like. "All policemans on-duty wore uniform". Then and only than, you can say "this one A wear uniform of a policeman -- that is a PROOF that he is a policeman". LOGIC! That os how it works.
Qtard confirms that he has no idea how logic works. Wearing a policeman's uniform doesn't make someone a policeman. A non-policeman can wear a policeman's uniform.
Qtard: \\Qtard and Minus FJ know the totalitarian playbook and deploy the tactics in it relentlessly. Accuse others...\\ AND??? How'd you know what in that "totalitarian playbook"???
Smartness.
Qtard: Than... give proofs.
I support democracy while Qtard supports the violent overthrow of democracy. I support for fair trials while Qtard calls says "fair trial, my ass".
Qtard: Why ONLY I are one who giving proofs here. Isn't that unfair -- to ask for proofs, but not provide em?
I've never see any "proof" from you.
Qtard: \\I support fair trials.\\ Yap. "Fair trials", while people being caled "guilty" long before em.
So what? You don't like people having opinions and expressing them? Except if they are in agreement with Qtard's opinion? Qtard is a dipshit. For sure. He thinks opinions are a reason to cancel trials. Set all people accused of crimes free. There are no laws anymore. UNLESS public agrees that NOBODY is to form an opinion about guilt of people accused of crimes. Which is, of course, impossible.
Qtard: VERY "fair". As in Nazi's Germany. Are you Jew? Then you are guilty. Go to... a camp of your choice: Dahau, or maybe Oswentsim, Aushwits? Good choice.
Qtarded stupidity. Jewish people weren't put on trial. They were just killed. For being Jewish, not for being accused of any crime.
Qtard: \\me: Qtard agrees but places quotation marks around "fair". Implying that I do not support fair trials, but sham trials that only appear to be fair. Which is a lie.\\ Well. Trials when it is defined BEFORE they started even who are guilty -- is a definition of sham trials. Yes.
But "defined BEFORE they started even who are guilty" isn't the case. Defendants are presumed innocent... by THE COURT. Public can think what they want. There is no way to even prevent people from forming opinions.
Qtard: Have something to oppose that? Would you DARE to oppose? To that LOGICAL conclusion.
Oppose what? Forbidding people from having opinions? Make having an opinion about the guilt or innocence of an accused person a thought crime? That is a completely illogical conclusion.
Above should read, "I need to have a reason to know what words MEAN?
\\We were talking about people who identify with the Nazi ideology.
And what is "Nazi ideology"??? Without party that pushes it into reality. Without leaders. Without power.
\\There might be one in Russia. I am not familiar with Russian political parties
National-Bolshevicks for examples.
You can found on Youtube (if it not deleted yet), whole marches. With anti-semitic transparants. With giving nazi hailing.
Definitely NAZI.
But... you have a blind eye for Rusha nazis. You see nazis ONLY where there CANNOT be ones. Ukrainians have fought AGAINST BOTH -- Nazis and Commies!
While most of other countries was colluding with one or another, or both. (Like USA)
That's why there is NO END of liars who spread such a nasty rumors about UA.
\\Because there is no country on planet earth called Rusha".
You do not known what nickname mean???
Obviously, cause you are idiot. :-))))))))))))))
\\However, because I also acknowledge facts (unlike Qtard), I have no choice but to admit the fact that some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis.
That is nasty poisonous propaganda that Rusha spread -- false equivalence between Nationalism === Nazism.
Why that is obvious lie -- Nazism that is SHORTCUT for national-SOCIALISM.
Well... and you prone to it, because YOUR Demn propaganda use it too.
That false equivalence.
And as you are "honest" slurper of propaganda - there is no surprise of you believing to that shit.
\\Similar to how the White Supremacists Minus FJ and Qtard deny being White Supremacists. Even anti-White Supremacists.
So? Chinese ARE Supremacists, still??? :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\me: Qtard denies this to falsely paint me as buying into Russian propaganda.\\ Hah... but you are ears deep in it.
\\I categorically reject it. Putin's claim that the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis is false.
But still... you admitted yourslf that you believe that "some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis."
That is Russian Propaganda poison it spread on the West.
You -- repeating that shit.
Means -- you are on the hook of Russian propaganda.
LOGIC!
And your "I categorically reject it" means only that you are hypocrite and liar. ;-P
Why?
Cause you doing that... but then, immediately, trying to deny that you are doing that.
And that is -- stupidiest of lies. ;-P
\\CNN never said the Ukrainian government is filled with Nazis.
Cause CNN is proficient and DO NOT spead propaganda lies in such a blatant way. ;-P
But still, you thing that there "some Ukrainian soldiers identify as Nazis." That is ENOUGH evidance of success of their labourous work. ;-P
\\Qtard: That idea that there is any nazis in Ukraine. And that... that you repeat that BS -- more than damning evidance, here.
\\It is me acknowledging a "pointing to reality" fact.
Yeah. You do not know what "being nazi" is. Cannot discern when some lies poured into your ears. Admitting yourself that you know little about that part of the World. And even Google cannot help you.
But... you able to "discern Reality"... ough-yeah! :-))))))))))))))
\\(Article excerpt from The Guardian)... Led by Tucker Carlson at Fox News, a few Republican rightwingers in Congress, and some conservative activists, a spate of comments that have disparaged Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and echoed other Russian war disinformation have been recycled by Moscow.
Oh... I need to praise you. For giving excerpts.
That is honest and correct way of introducing some facts... ehm, some input, into discussion.
Well... it do not disprove my point -- that Demn-aligned media have spread such false narratives (about Ukrainians being nazis).
So... it's easy for me to admit -- that some of Reps just try to use that already incoroprated propaganda and spin it for their (nasty?) political motives.
Politics -- that is dirty loundry of any country, do you agree?
That's why I praise my non-involvmnet in your inner politica brawls... but you keep trying to mark me with your dirt. Shame on you. Shame on you. ;-P
\\Why not? These people are supposedly on the "Left". Don't you love criticising the Left? Or, could it be that these people hate Joe Biden and you like that about them? So won't ever criticize them?
Yawn.
Cause... I am foreigner, who are uninvolved in your inner political brawls.
Your Captain Obvious.
Even if I'd try to answer to that your questions -- I can't. Because there is NO base for me. To feel this way or another. About your Right, or your Left. Or whatever.
WHY that is SO DAMN hard for you to understand????
Apart from obvious hypothesis -- that you are banal idiot. ;-P
\\how would that not be the END of democracy in America?
How would it be?
If some other democratic government would be instantiated?
For THIS government and system it might be a problem... but why it should be problem for Democracy, ahh???
\\Because all the evidence says he IS.
1) Evidnces... it's just beliefs.
2) Like your belief that you provided ANY such evidances, even. ;-P
\\Qtard: Only USURPATION of Power -- that is what can happen.
Like there is any difference.
For totalitarian there would not be, for sure.
Are you totalitarian?
\\Overthrow, definition: "remove forcibly from power". What the J6 rioters tried to do.
Hah... but you yourself declared that Biden WAS NOT in power.
So, who they tryed to "remove forcibly from power"???
\\I didn't say it was easy. The J6 rioters failed.
So... how can you know that their goal was to "install dictator"???
\\If you asked the J6 rioters they would tell you that they were fighting FOR democracy. That they were "stopping the steal" the usurper Biden was attempting. Most of the J6 rioters are useful idiots.
Well... being idiot -- it is not a crime, isn't it?
You should know it yourself. The most. ;-P
\\Do whatever the hell you want. I don't give a crap.
Except in that time you couldn't help it to cry "go away!"? ;-P
\\I strongly support democracy.
Well... your own version of what "democracy" mean.
Well... not like it anything wrong, under Democracy all kind of views are allowed and protected... ONLY, while that is ONLY views...
\\Of course. Why you continue to deny that you are a totalitarian. You are a lying scumbag.
Obviously... that is what totalitarian would say... to cover for his own totalitarian essence. ;-P
\\Even if the current lie contradicts prior lies. That's how pathological liars operate. Trait of a pathological liar confirmed.
Yeah. You confirmed that you are pathological liar. With this your illogical and not supported by any facts (quotes, quotes) try to twist and subvert my based on facts and logic words. ;-P
\\Qtard denies he is a Trekkie so strongly because it's true.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\Explained many many times. Over and over. You remember. But still you lie. Your strong support for the...\\ No. Do not remember.
\\You cut off my quote... "Your strong support for the..." ends with "...overthrow of democracy in the US". You keep arguing in favor of it. Many times previously. And you will continue to argue in favor of it. That you do not remember is BULLSHIT.
WAT???
I am not responsible for wirlwinds in your brain.
DARE to PRESENT your arguments in straightforward WAY:
1) FACTS (quotes here) you wanna base your claims on.
2) PREMICES -- how that FACTS related to anything you wanna prove.
3) LOGICAL base -- like some simple and undenyably true GENERAL statement.
4) CORRECT logical inference -- that show LOGICALLY how that square FACTS fall into that round holes, flawlessly. ;-P
\\You remember, but my explanations don't count. Because the explanations are not "with basing it on facts and logic".
Yap.
You gotcha.
As your claims are not logical. Well, illogical. And mostly merely are wishful whimsical BS. IT is hard, and there is NO reason for me to remember every damn your verbal spewing. ;-P
Again, You gotcha.
Go learn how to present your arguments logically (by example above or... you can find a help with Google, ask "How to use Logic in a discussion?" or whatever).
Or... continue confirming being a losy idiot. ;-P
\\honest debate
Ha... :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
From your mouth, it sounds... even blashemious.
But, do I care??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\"Going by the street" was not allowed. They had a permit to protest where donald tRump (and others) whipped them up. No violence yet, though. Entering of the Capitol? Yes. They used violence to accomplish that. Hand to hand combat with police outside the Capitol is definitely violence. It is a fact. Confirmed by pointing to reality. Absolutely denying Objective Reality -- YOU DID IT. You have written it.
Dunno.
I'd leave it to your Legal System to decide -- who was at fault and for what.
Because I believe it is democratic enough for that.
And are you???
Well... that is YOUR inner political brawls, I like to admit being NOT involved into. ;-P
\\How should I know? You're the one who threatened me.
With a joke??? You saw through in a jiffy?
Are you totalitarian -- to beware of jokes???
Or just an idiot, who do not understand humor? ;-P
\\Qtard confirms that he has no idea how logic works. Wearing a policeman's uniform doesn't make someone a policeman. A non-policeman can wear a policeman's uniform.
That's it.
NOT ALL general statements are correct.
Like your cyrcular reasoning "I am democrat... cause I support democracy". ;-P
That is the same as with this police uniform example.
\\Smartness.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Than... give proofs.
\\I support democracy while Qtard supports the violent overthrow of democracy. I support for fair trials while Qtard calls says "fair trial, my ass".
But that is... not proofs.
IT HAVE NO structure of proof. There is no links with Reality given.
Ergo. That is just some random baseless statments.
Yawn.
Wishi-washi name-calling. ;-P
\\I've never see any "proof" from you.
So what?
You showed that you UNABLE to see A FACT even.
EVEN when that is YOUR OWN DAMN words... :-)))))))))))))))))
That makes it NOT surprising -- that your (apparently honest, congrats) self-revelation -- that you cannot see based on facts and logic proofs. ;-P
That's... quite natural.
\\There are no laws anymore. UNLESS public agrees that NOBODY is to form an opinion about guilt of people accused of crimes. Which is, of course, impossible.
Well... that would be Ideal World.
But this world NOT ideal one. For sure.
So, what was your question, again? ;-P
\\Qtarded stupidity. Jewish people weren't put on trial. They were just killed.
YAP.
You gotcha.
Because WHY they need to be put on trial -- when it was declared that they are appatently are guilty.
That is why NAZI regime was criminal and deeply UNdemocratic.
That's why... honing Presumption of Innocence and preserving Human Rights is SO DARN important... to not becam like that nazis.
Do YOU get it????
Or not, because you are such a totalitarian... wannabe? ;-P
\\Public can think what they want. There is no way to even prevent people from forming opinions.
Pfft!
The same as in Nazi Germany???
Public have had opinion that "all Jews are criminals". And therefore courts was ready to persecute em (cause, courts are NOT separated from general public. They follow that mood most of the people have). And then, as that idea became wide spread (see, even COURTS confirm, that all Jews are scum). That need to preserve their Human Rights, even if by the mean of sham trial, was postoponed at all... because "Public can think what they want."
Dervy lives in a two dimensional "Binary Land/ Flatland" that contains no excluded middles or unobserved dimensions.
:P
Aren't you talking about Kekistan? I've never even visited.
Perhaps Qtardia?
"Nazis" in Qtardia are people who believe donald tRump HAS to be presumed innocent (by the court) and MUST receive a fair trial. Even if they personally have the opinion that donald tRump is guilty.
Perhaps i was too generous, granting Dervy two-dimensions. The founder of the New Left, Herbert Marcuse wrote "One Dimensional Man". And yes, it was a book about Dervy!
:P
There were actually a lot of pretty prescient arguments made in that book, about Dervy's kind, anyways.
Wow, I need to re-read this. I didn't "get it" at the time, but it's very Byung-Chul Han.
The video you linked to is a cartoon with voice performances provided by Democrats. Martin Sheen is a strong Lefty Democrat.
When Derpy want to run away from (unsuccessful) discussion. He starts talking gibberish non-sense.
Yawn.
No Derpish ravings???
When Qtard wants to run away from (unsuccessful) discussion he starts talking gibberish nonsense. Yawn.
Yet one bihavioral confirmation of RetarDerpy's moronity.
Thank you, De-Ru-Pi. ;-P
The same as in Nazi America??? Public have had opinion that "all donald tRumps are criminals". And therefore courts are ready to persecute them.
Naaah. If there is anyone else so unfortunate as to be named "Donald Trump", I wouldn't hold it against him. Heck, I'd even say that, if they wanted to legally change their name, they should be able to do so... free of charge.
Yawn.
Gibberish. "Derpish Escape" tactics, AGAIN. :-))))))
It's YOUR gibberish. You're the one saying donald tRump is like a Jew being persecuted/murdered by Hitler.
Ahh???
I know, I know. My fault. Mea culpa. :-)))
I keep forgoting that miserly brains of an idiot -- not fit to understand complex matters.
Even as simple one, as historical analogies...
There is no complexity in your moronic "tRump is being persecuted like Jews in Nazi Germany" stupidity.
Your brain's miserable capabilities to grasp complex matters... not my problem. Yawn.
It's my entertainment. ;-P
LOL. An idiot's delusions of grandeur -- thinks his stupidity is complex -- is not MY problem.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Yeah. You are right -- your stupidity is not complex. And you, are most wise idiot, who know all about it.
That's why it's so interesting, exciting... and entertaining.
To observe your idiotic babbling. ;-P
Continue-continue.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But still, my comment here still lost.
Post a Comment