Politics from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
What "regulated goods" did you discuss in violation of community guidelines?
Progressivism, social justice, and probably a few others.
For example, a reporter at the OSU protest had a gun and may have been ultimately responsible for the 4 dead in O-hi-o.
Where's the media reporting? Cancel culture, thy name is 'Democrat'.
Huh? Those aren't "regulated goods". You don't say where this happened, either. I believe that Reddit is a "safe place" for you to post far right conspiracy theories. You aren't active there?
The MSM doesn't regulate them with outrage? Who knew?
Correction to my prior comment: the term I meant to write is "safe space", not "safe place". Clearly you need one. Conservatives are such whiny snowflakes. You cry about being "discriminated" against because people object to your hate. The CORRECT response to hate is outrage. "Regulated with outrage"? Get bent. You'd have a REAL problem if you lived in Germany. There they don't tolerate your kind.Quote: The law [in Germany] prohibits the distribution or public use of symbols of unconstitutional groups -- in particular, flags, insignia, uniforms, slogans and forms of greeting. [end quote].You refuse to say, so I'm going to guess that the "regulated goods" you were referring to was something of the nature mentioned in the Strafgesetzbuch, section 86a. Either Nazi or KKK "regulated goods".
What is 'good' for the goose is gravy for the gander...
ps- Community Standards aren't regulatory by nature? Who knew?
If you're paying the hosting fees for an online community, you get to set the rules. I'd have thought that was something a conservative would agree with. You'll have to find someplace else to buy and/or sell your Nazi and/or Confederate memorabilia. boo hoo!
Speaking of Confederate memorabilia, how come you weren't protesting the Alfalfa Club meeting @ WaPo owner Jeff Bezo's new house in DC last weekend? It doesn't bother you when Mitt Romney and a bunch of bazillionaires including Bill Gates celebrate Robert E. Lee's birthday?
But then again, they OWN the nation, so who are we peons to complain about their insensitive holiday celebrations?
I wonder if Cory Booker went this year...
Nobody should be celebrating the birthday of Robert E Lee. Although I'd wager that you do (and that this is another of your fake whines). btw, Dotard considers Jeff Bezo an enemy, so why the hell does Amazon still pay zero in taxes?
Why would I celebrate Lee-Jackson Day? I just want to know why Cory Booker celebrates it now, and Barack Obama did in the past...“If he were here with us tonight, the General would be 202 years old,” Obama mused in his speech, confronting the unlikely moment. “And very confused.”
More hypocrisy from you. You JUST claimed that a Jew can't be a White Nationalist. Yet you claim that two Black men celebrate a traitor who fought for slavery. That quote (if real, I did not Google it) is no "celebration". It's just more of your stupidity (to suggest mentioning someone's birthday is an endorsement of everything they believed).
Obama could have kneeled on the field... but he didn't. Just shows you what hypocrites Democrats are.
Protest is a way for those without power to signal to those with power what their concerns are. Why would the most powerful man in the world kneel in protest? Instead of protesting, Obama acted.
Bill Clinton kneeled and refused to attend Alfalfa Club events until women were admitted as members.Obama's "actions" (taking over the Baltimore City PD) have done NOTHING to reduce crime or the murder rate. They've demoralized the police and lead to a down-spiral of police corruption and escalating crime. Good job Barrack!
ps - How does sending paid activists from the US DOJ Office of Civil Rights to Ferguson, MO to organize BLM protest marches help reduce crime? Can't the Left's Black Blocs organize their own protests?
It demoralizes the police to be held accountable for killing people? Too bad. They should strive to do better, not become corrupt. Those are the ones who should be fired . How about we pay criminals not to commit crimes? I'm sure being sent to prison demoralizes them.
You wouldn't object to being forced to wear a body camera surveilling yourself every day? You wouldn't find the lack of trust "demoralizing"?
How about we pay criminals not to commit crimes?We already do. It's called "Welfare".
20-80% of the US population is a "surplus", disposable, and contribute zilch to the US economy. The "smart" ones are employed in make-work. The dumb ones sit at home collecting welfare.
When you give people the authority to kill, precautions should be MANDATORY. Trust but verify. If they can't handle it they can find another profession.If we're paying people to not commit crimes, why is there still crime?
It doesn't pay very well. There no "surplus salary" to earn unless you sell ILLEGAL drugs, etc.
In other words, the "system" doesn't work for them. It offers NO legal alternatives for capital formation or accumulation.
It's a machine for turning Arthur Flecks into Jokers.
What jobs would you have 85 IQ demoralized police officers apply for?
The smart ones will likely turn to crime (as they'll now be trained in how to avoid capture).
You have a very cynical worldview. And think very little of your fellow humans. Everyone is crooked, but Dotard is crooked and ON YOUR SIDE (as a White Nationalist). And THAT is why you support him, right?FYI, the good/smart police officers will follow the rules and acknowledge the fact that we need body cams to catch the bad ones and hold them accountable.
No, the smart ones put a piece of tape over their bodycam.
If a suspect is roughed up or killed after that tape is placed the result should be that the officer is fired and charged. That certainly would be very incriminating evidence in a trial.
lol! sure. THAT's what happens.
Why else cover up the camera? Anger at having privacy violated? Get a different job. Workers at Amazon have to be searched before leaving the warehouse. They only asked to be paid for the time they stood standing in line waiting to be searched and the courts said no. Their privacy is being violated and they can't shoot (to kill) anyone.
The found having to submit to searches demoralizing? Gee, I can't imagine why... maybe they should just get another job.
Post a Comment