Gee, Shawn Henry, President of CrowdStrike, is now named as a defendant in the illegal FBI surveillance of Sheryl Atkinson. So how soon will it be for them to uncover that the "Russian Hack" of the DNC was ALL a cover for FBI Contractor database abuse and spying on the Trump campaign?
Defendant Shawn Henry was the head of the Washington Field Office of the FBI. He previously served as head of cybercrime at the FBI in the capacity of executive assistant director of the Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch under FBI Director Robert Mueller, III. In 2012, Henry left the FBI and now is president of CrowdStrike Services, a company that seeks to investigate attacks on corporate and government networks globally.
5 comments aleady. I figured I must have written something you replied to. But no. Nothing here but your nonsense. Is Putin part of the "deep state" now?
Trump revealed intelligence secrets to Russians in Oval Office. (excerpt) ... Donald Trump disclosed highly classified information to Russia’s foreign minister about a planned Islamic State operation ... the intelligence discussed by Trump in his meeting with Lavrov was classified "Top Secret" and held in a secure "compartment" to which only a handful of intelligence officials have access [end excerpt].
Dotard is a PROVEN security risk. The evidence isn't a "drip, drip, drip" -- it is a TORRENT of reporting showing he is UNFIT for the office. He isn't only an incompetent boob, but a willing Russian asset.
Why are you concerned about "worried" (past tense) and not worry (present tense)? Because you're OK with Dotard passing secrets to the Russians and the Chinese?
Total non sequitur. You can't learn Russian by not caring about Russian influence. If so, you'd be fluent. And there was no Russian influence 12 years ago that I'm aware of. So, no. I don't care that much about your delusions. Anyway, how does using an unsecure Blackberry equal "influence"? You think Russians were sending Hillary subliminal messages through it?
BTW, I never said I did not care. I do not care any longer. It was certainly worthy of caring about at the time. HRC is currently out of office and not running for any office. The present threat comes from your beloved Dotard.
Why should I take seriously a person who only cares about America's security when the administration is Democratic and does not care at all when the administration is Russian-puppeted?
BTW, you speak a new language without study and any actual effort to learn it? Who knew?
I was in the US Naval Reserve during the Ford, Carter AND Reagan Administrations. I took my oath to protect and defend the US Constitution. Where were you?
Oaths can be taken and not adhered to. The Putin-puppet occupying the White House took an oath to protect and defend a document he has never read. And that contains sections he views as phony.
I know the Dotard administration is using it to conceal his crimes. He wrongly believes it's a shield that (whenever invoked) allows him to withhold whatever information he wants. Also, it isn't in the Constitution, so yes, you bringing it up is another non sequitur. YOURS.
22 comments:
Gee, Shawn Henry, President of CrowdStrike, is now named as a defendant in the illegal FBI surveillance of Sheryl Atkinson. So how soon will it be for them to uncover that the "Russian Hack" of the DNC was ALL a cover for FBI Contractor database abuse and spying on the Trump campaign?
Seems there's now a whistleblower...
Developing.
You go girl!
...poor Shawn... the whistleblower gave him up.
Defendant Shawn Henry was the head of the Washington Field Office of the FBI. He previously served as head of cybercrime at the FBI in the capacity of executive assistant director of the Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch under FBI Director Robert Mueller, III. In 2012, Henry left the FBI and now is president of CrowdStrike Services, a company that seeks to investigate attacks on corporate and government networks globally.
...the drip, drip, drip is becoming a steady stream now...
5 comments aleady. I figured I must have written something you replied to. But no. Nothing here but your nonsense. Is Putin part of the "deep state" now?
U.S. officials concerned Trump discussing sensitive information on unsecured cellphone. (excerpt) ...Chinese and Russian spies have been listening to personal phone calls Trump has made from his cellphones [end excerpt].
Trump revealed intelligence secrets to Russians in Oval Office. (excerpt) ... Donald Trump disclosed highly classified information to Russia’s foreign minister about a planned Islamic State operation ... the intelligence discussed by Trump in his meeting with Lavrov was classified "Top Secret" and held in a secure "compartment" to which only a handful of intelligence officials have access [end excerpt].
Dotard is a PROVEN security risk. The evidence isn't a "drip, drip, drip" -- it is a TORRENT of reporting showing he is UNFIT for the office. He isn't only an incompetent boob, but a willing Russian asset.
Nobody worried about Hillary's Blackberry....how come?
Why are you concerned about "worried" (past tense) and not worry (present tense)? Because you're OK with Dotard passing secrets to the Russians and the Chinese?
And why have you never worried in the past...because you speak Russian and Chinese now?
Obviously, when it comes to this question, you have no answer. Hence all you can do is dodge.
Obviously, since you're already a Russia speaker as a result of not caring about Russian influence 12 years ago, I should dodge all your questions.
Total non sequitur. You can't learn Russian by not caring about Russian influence. If so, you'd be fluent. And there was no Russian influence 12 years ago that I'm aware of. So, no. I don't care that much about your delusions. Anyway, how does using an unsecure Blackberry equal "influence"? You think Russians were sending Hillary subliminal messages through it?
BTW, I never said I did not care. I do not care any longer. It was certainly worthy of caring about at the time. HRC is currently out of office and not running for any office. The present threat comes from your beloved Dotard.
You can't learn Russian by not caring about Russian influence
Tell that to former East Germans.
Why should I take a person who has never had a care about America's security in the past seriously on issues of America's security today?
That's the real non sequitor.
Why should I take seriously a person who only cares about America's security when the administration is Democratic and does not care at all when the administration is Russian-puppeted?
BTW, you speak a new language without study and any actual effort to learn it? Who knew?
I was in the US Naval Reserve during the Ford, Carter AND Reagan Administrations. I took my oath to protect and defend the US Constitution. Where were you?
Oaths can be taken and not adhered to. The Putin-puppet occupying the White House took an oath to protect and defend a document he has never read. And that contains sections he views as phony.
If he never read it, why would he think that sections of it were phony? That's a bit of a non sequitor, isn't it?
Dotard said the Emoluments portion was phony. It's his non sequitur.
He's said nothing about Executive Privilege? Or is that just another non sequitor?
I know the Dotard administration is using it to conceal his crimes. He wrongly believes it's a shield that (whenever invoked) allows him to withhold whatever information he wants. Also, it isn't in the Constitution, so yes, you bringing it up is another non sequitur. YOURS.
Then why doesn't the House appeal to the Courts to get it removed?
lol!
Post a Comment