Your New Local PD Overseers...
The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It includes measures to increase accountability for law enforcement misconduct, to enhance transparency and data collection, and to eliminate discriminatory policing practices.
The bill facilitates federal enforcement of constitutional violations (e.g., excessive use of force) by state and local law enforcement. Among other things, it does the following:
- lowers the criminal intent standard—from willful to knowing or reckless—to convict a law enforcement officer for misconduct in a federal prosecution,
- limits qualified immunity as a defense to liability in a private civil action against a law enforcement officer or state correctional officer, and
- authorizes the Department of Justice to issue subpoenas in investigations of police departments for a pattern or practice of discrimination.
The bill also creates a national registry—the National Police Misconduct Registry—to compile data on complaints and records of police misconduct.
It establishes a framework to prohibit racial profiling at the federal, state, and local levels.
The bill establishes new requirements for law enforcement officers and agencies, including to report data on use-of-force incidents, to obtain training on implicit bias and racial profiling, and to wear body cameras.
Accountable to who? DOJ and the Deep State, of course.
(CNN) The House of Representatives on Wednesday approved legislation aimed at preventing police misconduct that Democrats named in honor of George Floyd, whose death in police custody sparked nationwide calls to overhaul policing and address racial injustice.
House Democrats originally introduced and passed the bill -- titled the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act -- last year in the wake of Floyd's death, but it never passed in the Senate, which was under Republican control at the time. Supporters of the bill say it would improve law enforcement accountability and work to root out racial bias in policing.
Two moderate Democrats -- Reps. Jared Golden of Maine and Ron Kind of Wisconsin -- opposed the measure, while GOP Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas said after the fact that he had voted for it by accident.
Democrats now control the Senate, which has a 50-50 partisan split with Vice President Kamala Harris acting as the tie breaker. But most legislation in that chamber still requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster and it's not clear there would be enough Republican support to get the legislation across the finish line in the Senate.
Rep. Karen Bass, a California Democrat who is leading police overhaul efforts in the House, told reporters on Wednesday, "We are still trying to transform policing in the United States" and said that she is "confident that we will be able to have a bipartisan bill in the Senate that will reach President Biden's desk."
The legislation would set up a national registry of police misconduct to stop officers from evading consequences for their actions by moving to another jurisdiction. It would ban racial and religious profiling by law enforcement at the federal, state and local levels, and it would overhaul qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that critics say shields law enforcement from accountability.
According to a fact sheet on the legislation, the measure would allow "individuals to recover damages in civil court when law enforcement officers violate their constitutional rights by eliminating qualified immunity for law enforcement." The fact sheet also states that the legislation would "save lives by banning chokeholds and no-knock warrants" and would mandate "deadly force be used only as a last resort."
Discussing next steps for the legislation, Bass said ahead of the House vote, "We will begin those discussions with the Senate immediately after the bill is passed," adding, "Over the last several weeks, discussions especially with Sen. Tim Scott and Sen. Cory Booker have been under way."
Scott, a South Carolina Republican who led Senate GOP efforts to address policing in the wake of Floyd's death, said earlier in the week, "I'm talking to both sides and hopefully we'll come up with something that actually works."
Scott also said, "What I'm interested is in finding a path forward on areas where we agree. we have not gotten to a place where we agree on qualified immunity."
When the policing bill passed the House last year, it was approved largely along party lines amid Republican opposition with three Republicans crossing party lines to vote in favor: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Will Hurd of Texas, who has since retired from Congress, and Fred Upton of Michigan.
The House made plans to vote on the bill Wednesday night, but the vote had earlier been slated for Thursday.
A Democratic aide told CNN earlier Wednesday that there was discussion of the House staying late to avoid coming in Thursday in light of Capitol Police warning about security risks.
US officials have alerted lawmakers to a potential threat against the US Capitol on March 4, for which security has been enhanced as a precaution, less than two months after the Capitol complex was stormed and lawmakers' lives were threatened by rioters.
This story and headline have been updated with additional developments Wednesday.
CNN's Whitney Wild, Annie Grayer, Jim Sciutto, Manu Raju, Ali Zaslav and Jamie Ehrlich contributed to this report.
Whoa! This is big trouble!
ReplyDeleteit's not clear there would be enough Republican support to get the legislation across the finish line in the Senate
ReplyDeleteI think that it might get passed. Critical Race Theory has overtaken many Republicans, too.
Furthermore, there is fear of the mob now.
Is the "deeps state" different than the "deep state"?
ReplyDelete^^Typo Police^^
ReplyDeleteEvery local PD is NOT going to be taken over. That is a totally false narrative. The George Floyd justice in policing act only provides for some needed oversight.
ReplyDeleteEvery local PD will get a DOJ political correctness commissar for review, oversight and control. Reminds me of the USSR...
ReplyDeleteOne thing always leads to another...
ReplyDeleteNo oversight has lead to White Nationalist infiltration and racist cops thinking they can murder suspects.
ReplyDeletePutting Black Critical Theorists in an OFFICIAL "oversight" role of local police departments is 100x more dangerous than any purposeful "infiltration" by White Supremacists could ever be.
ReplyDeleteWhoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.
ReplyDeleteFriedrich Nietzsche
So people shouldn't fight monsters but let them do as they please (for fear of becoming monsters themselves)? I'm sure you'd like that.
ReplyDeleteHitler didn't like them either. That's why he killed so many Jews.
ReplyDeleteOh wait, but the Jews weren't monsters? He made them intoe imaginary monsters like your racists? Whoddathinkit?
Let's us all now purify the social body and expel the unworthy.... e-r-r-r-r-r-r!
ReplyDeleteDemocrats have got no aloha spirit!
ReplyDeleteJewish people were (and still are) the victims of the racism you say is "imaginary". Your people marched and chanted "Jew will not replace us" in Charlottesville. And Dotard declared them to be "very fine people". These are the monsters (your peeps) that the Democrats fight. And why the fighting back angers you. Also why you continue with your absurd lies about such people being "imaginary".
ReplyDelete"Imaginary" antisemites also participated in the Capitol riot. More "very fine people".
Still pitching lies about Charlottesville I see. Your people marched. My president condemned them.
ReplyDeleteLOL! You're the one pitching lies. I'm telling the truth. The same truth that motivated president Biden to run for the White House (and WIN). The side you THINK Dotard was referring to (as I've pointed out to you multiple times) WAS NOT THERE (people who have ancestors who were traitors and they're only concerned about honoring their heritage). The two sides who WERE THERE were White Supremacists and NeoNazis and Leftists protesting them.
ReplyDeleteNot that IF Dotard was talking about the "side" that wasn't there -- that makes it much better. Given that these people want to keep statues of traitors that were put up to intimidate Black people into knowing their place. As opposed to being embarrassed to be related to traitors who fought for the "right" to own Black people.
Also, "My president condemned them"? He condemned the imaginary White Supremacists? Imaginary according to many past comments by you. Now they're real. Though your condemnation is imaginary.
The presence of a dozen white supremacists do not an imminent menace or movement make.
ReplyDeletemeanwhile...
ReplyDeleteThe White Supremacist movement resulted in the elevation of Donald J tRump to the presidency. "No tRump, no KKK, no fascist USA" is a good chant. You can't discount it by painting over the faces of REAL people with gray "NPC" faces. These are people who think for themselves and can see with their own eyes (and hear with their own ears) the racist fascist rhetoric coming from the Right. Why your side works so hard lying about these people (with a plethora of BS YouTubes). LOL.
ReplyDeleteThe Woke Supremacist movement is fighting a war on 5,000 Americans who have no influence over policies affecting the lives of average minorities. It is doing so for one purpose only, extend federal power to local jurisdictions. They are the new American Boogeymen. Boo! White Supremacists are EVERYWHERE!
ReplyDelete"No influence" explains the plethora of voter suppression laws in Red states? Who knew? And the number of people identifying as "republican" is dropping, but I still think it's a lot higher than 5k.
ReplyDeleteSounds like we need more FEDERAL oversight of STATE officials, right, Dervy? The FEDS are just so much fairer and more honest than STATE and LOCAL officials and have proven themselves the only ones, other than BLUE STATE GOVERNORS, who can do the job "properly". A King needs ALL available tools for keeping his many LORDS and FIEFDOMS in line with the KINGS policy of securing the KINGS CASTLE through support of the PEASANTS. Only when EVERY PEASANT can vote will the KINGS CASTLE be secure. And only when no LORD can be questioned as to the conduct of the counting of his FIEFDOMS votes will the KINGS LEGITIMACY remain unchallenged.
ReplyDeleteYou're conflating democracy and monarchy. The US doesn't have a king. Although YOU wanted one. QED you were ALL FOR Dotard Donald (the "authoritarian outsider") seizing more power. And it was YOUR king that put up a massive anti-climb wall following protests around the White House.
ReplyDeleteDidn't Trump order the insurrection? Why would he have put fences around the capitol/white house then? You're not making sense again.
ReplyDelete