Saturday, August 15, 2020

Get Back to Work, America!

 

What history will record as the great COVID coup of 2020 is based on lies and fear manufactured by America’s ruling class—led by the Democratic Party and aided by the complaisance of most Republican politicians.


In March, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) presented the coronavirus to the Western world as a danger equivalent to the plague. But China’s experience, which its government obfuscated, had already shown that COVID-19 was much less like the plague and more like the flu. All that has happened since followed from falsifying this basic truth.

Americans were led to believe that the virus was unusually contagious, and that it would kill up to one in 20 persons it infected—a 5 percent infection/fatality rate (IFR). Today, we still lack definitive, direct knowledge of COVID-19’s true lethality. The absence of that knowledge allows bureaucrats to continue fearmongering.

By May, a  host of studies in the U.S. and around the world showing that the vast majority of COVID cases cause mild symptoms or none, and showing the IFR to be equal to or lower than that for most flus, forced the CDC to conclude that the lethality rate, far from being 5 percent, was 0.26%––double that of a typical flu. Instead of amending their recommendations in the face of this reality, the CDC and the U.S. government tried to hide it by manipulating the definition and number of COVID “cases.”

Federal officials defined “cases” as people sick enough to be hospitalized who also tested positive for the virus—this represented the “curve” that we were urged to sacrifice so much to “flatten,” lest a wave of hospitalizations overwhelm our health-care system. That wave never came. The CDC and feds began labeling mere infections as “cases” and stopped reporting “cases” together with the number of deaths. They did this to frighten the inattentive public about “spiking COVID cases.” They also inflated the number of deaths attributed to COVID by including illnesses such as pneumonia and influenza and others into the death figures.

In reality, those who died with or of COVID-19 nearly always suffered from other diseases as well, such as Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and compromised lungs, in addition to being elderly and infirm. COVID-19’s effect on ordinary healthy persons is considerably milder than those of ordinary respiratory diseases.

COVID-19 is not America’s plague. There was never the slightest evidence that the virus could produce mass casualties; all evidence pointed in the opposite direction. Instead, the ruling class took this opportunity to extort the general public’s compliance with its agendas. Their claim to speak on behalf of “science” is an attempt to avoid being held accountable for the enormous harm that they are doing. They continue doing it because they want to hold on to the power the panic has brought them.

In sum, the lockdowns have been inflicted and perpetuated by people who care more about your subjugation than your health. They want to wreck the U.S. economy and increase the Democratic Party’s chances in the 2020 election. And they might succeed.

The 2016 election raised the possibility that the presidency’s enormous powers might be used to dismantle the ruling class’s network of prestige and privileges. In response, elites launched what has amounted to a “full court press” against the Trump administration, treating anything and everything about the administration as illegitimate. Despite their best efforts, the U.S. economy boomed. Trump’s approval ratings rose. As 2020 dawned and Trump seemed a cinch for reelection, the political left and its allies grasped for ways of damaging him.

COVID-19 was the perfect chance to produce, stoke, and maintain fear in pursuit of power. In short, the ruling class used the coronavirus to collapse American life. We are living through a coup d’état based on the oldest of ploys: declaring emergencies, suspending law and rights, and issuing arbitrary rules of behavior to excuse taking “full powers.”

Truth and clarity about the 2020 COVID coup are necessary for the United States to overcome its effects. Americans are anxious for truth about what happened—and what is still happening. The lies upon which this scam has been based are so substantively thin, and the resources for establishing the truth so abundant, that a few courageous leaders in key places may suffice.

For example, nothing is stopping the Senate from functioning as a truth commission regarding the COVID coup. Since the virus scam is based on lies and misrepresentations by persons of considerable power and prestige, expert questioning under oath before television cameras can let Americans judge for themselves why “medical experts” stigmatized those going to the beach and church—while not objecting, later, to the even greater numbers of Americans rioting in the streets.

State governors, as well, can provide practical leadership to motivate, guide, and legitimize life independent of our dysfunctional ruling class. Several U.S. states never shut down, while others reduced activities far less than the likes of California and New York. Like Sweden’s government, these states’ officials didn’t believe that COVID-19 was the plague and saw individual responsibility as the surest guarantee of safety for all. Indeed, the public would benefit from seeing these states’ governors defend their widely different perspectives on the COVID pandemic—and the results of their policies and decisions.

An honest reckoning, if we can get one, will reveal that the COVID-19 experience in America has only tangentially been about health. It has been, predominantly, a political campaign based on the pretense of health but dedicated to the maintenance of elite control—and it has done far more damage and caused more misery than the coronavirus itself.

40 comments:

  1. Dotard ignored the virus for months. This is not another "coup".

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...until you acknowledge that the legal battles over mismarked, unmarked, late and fraudulent ballots will take years and so President Trump, if defeated, won't leave office until 2024 regardless of the final tally.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Personally, I would have thought that the 2000 election debacle would have schooled you on this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How did THAT turn out for "lovers of Democracy"?

    ReplyDelete
  5. As per the Constitution, Dotard's term ENDS on January 20, 2020. If the winner isn't clear Nancy Pelosi will become interim president. Or whomever the speaker of the House is. Also, the SCOTUS specifically ruled that their decision to anoint gwb over the true winner (Al Gore) wasn't supposed to set a precedent. Joe Biden will not concede. Democrats are ready to fight.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How is Nancy going to assume the office if they're still counting contested mail-in votes in California? LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  7. She will assume office pursuant to the Constitution. As I just noted.

    ReplyDelete
  8. They allow un-re-elected Congress people to assume Congressional Offices? Where's THAT in the Constitution?

    ReplyDelete
  9. California's going to be the LAST state in the union to learn who won what elected offices in 2020.

    ReplyDelete
  10. According to Snopes, given that Nancy Pelosi is up for election, "the next in line would be the Senate president pro-tempore". And "all 435 members of the House, including Pelosi, and a total of 35 senators are up for reelection in 2020. The remaining 65 senators would be majority Democrats". Which would make the interim president the Democratic Senate president pro-tempore.

    Such a scenario would DEFINITELY not allow Dotard to remain in office. Because "...the president has no authority whatsoever... to extend his term past noon on January 20th".

    ReplyDelete
  11. And the Senate does? Who knew? When does Mitch turn over his gavel?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Chuck Grassley is the president pro-tempore of THIS session of the Senate. If we don't count Congresspersons up for reelection (reason you said the interim president couldn't be Nancy Pelosi) Democrats not up for reelection have the majority in the Senate (and would select a new president pro-tempore, who would then be next in the order of succession).

    Who knew? Anyone who has read or consulted the Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Are you sure that the Republican State governors wouldn't just appoint "temporary" replacements? There are 26 of them... lol!

    ReplyDelete
  14. btw - I don't think that you've ever attended a change of command ceremony.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't know that they could do that, but if that happened then the governor of California would appoint a temporary replacement for Nancy Pelosi, and then that person would be next in line.

    ReplyDelete
  16. lol! Seniority doesn't accompany seats. btw- There are five states where they can't do that, which knocks out one Republican Senator and two Democrats (who are running this year). :)

    ReplyDelete
  17. PS- And the rule comes from the 17th Amendment and only applies to the Senate.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies." -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution

    ReplyDelete
  19. Re "Seniority doesn't accompany seats". Of course not. You bring it up because you think I said it did? None of this really matters anyway, as the result will be known sooner than in years. The result will include not include MANY votes people cast for Democrats that Dotard's cheating get's tossed. It will also not include MANY votes people cast for Democrats due to normal republican cheating.

    However, unless Putin's hackers change a LOT more votes, I think Joe Biden will win. Although Dotard might then try and sue to get more votes thrown out. We'll see. Everyone I listen to thinks it's going to be a mess and go on for awhile. But not years. And, whatever happens, Dotard's first term Constitutionally ends January 20th. His first (and a majority of voters pray) ONLY term.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think Biden's going to be the subject of an FBI Counter-Intelligence operation related to Chinese support during the election... :)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Go ahead. Though it would be a waste of time and resources. Because such an investigation would find no involvement by Joe Biden or anyone in his campaign with any Chinese Nationals. Unlike the FBI Counter-Intelligence operation related to Russian support for Dotard in the run up to the 2016 election. That's how Dotard's campaign got "spied" on. They were talking to and meeting with Russian nationals. Whereas nobody in the Joe Biden campaign is talking to or meeting with Chinese nationals.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Finding no involvement didn't stop Mueller or Comey, they just faked it with Steele, CIA Assessment, and the SSCI/Mueller Reports.

    ReplyDelete
  23. What about Marco Rubio, Jim Risch, Susan Collins, Roy Blunt, Tom Cotton, John Cornyn, and Ben Sasse (the republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee)? Are they a part of the (imaginary) "deep state" too? fyi, things that actually happened aren't "fake".

    ReplyDelete
  24. Its' also referred to as the "Uniparty". They attend Davos get-togethers religiously.

    ReplyDelete
  25. lol! The embarrassments were Obama's Berlin and Cairo apologetics.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Quote: As has been the case throughout his presidency, U.S. President Donald Trump receives largely negative reviews from publics around the world. Across 32 countries surveyed by Pew Research Center, a median of 64% say they do not have confidence in Trump to do the right thing in world affairs, while just 29% express confidence in the American leader. Anti-Trump sentiments are especially common in Western Europe: Roughly three-in-four or more lack confidence in Trump in Germany, Sweden, France, Spain and the Netherlands.

    In nearly all nations where trends are available, Trump receives lower ratings than his predecessor, Barack Obama. As reported by the Center in 2017, international confidence in the U.S. president plummeted after Trump's inauguration, while favorable ratings for the United States also declined. [1/8/2020]

    ReplyDelete
  27. PolitiFact rates the "apology" claims FALSE.

    Quote: As we did our research, we noticed that the idea that Obama has traveled the world apologizing is popular among some conservative Web sites. The Heritage Foundation, for example, published an analysis in June 2009 called "Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies". Similar compilations are available elsewhere, and radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh has mentioned Obama apologizing several times. ...

    But as we looked over Obama's remarks, we noticed that he never used the word that is the universal hallmark of apologies: "sorry". ... At a speech in Cairo on relations between the U.S. and the Islamic world, Obama got very close to regretting decades-old U.S. actions in Iran. But then he immediately countered with criticism of Iran. He did not make a formal expression of regret, but suggested both countries simply "move forward". [end quote].

    ReplyDelete
  28. Negative reviews by foreign leaders is all good news for American citizens. Who gives a 'f what Merkel thinks! :)

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think you don't mind being hated (as a Dotard supporter) because you think you're superior to most people. Especially non-white foreigners.

    ReplyDelete
  30. ...actually, it's ALL foreigners AND their misguided allies.

    ReplyDelete
  31. A majority of the citizens of the world (outside the US) hate Dotard. He lost the popular vote (meaning a majority of US citizens hate him). And you somehow think this indicates Dotard is going a great job??

    ReplyDelete