I did not watch the video, but hasn't your side been claiming that there IS an emergency? Time to cancel tRump's fake national emergency. I mean, if you're now acknowledging that it has been manufactured. Even if you're wrong about who manufactured it. How the Hell could the "squad" manufacture a border crisis by telling the truth about how the Orange Turd administration is abusing Christian Refugees in the concentration camps they've set up?
Watch the video so that you can offer an "informed" comments. Uninformed comments are simply half-truths that don't hold up once the entire case gets presented.
Trump didn't manufacture the crisis, as alluded to in the title. The video presents "how the squad has manufactured a border crisis" and "why the refugees are being 'abused'".
I don't see how the "squad" could have done such a thing. It is the tRump administration that is in charge. Therefore the responsibility is theirs. And, yes, it was the tRump administration that created the crisis. By changing how the government handles such refugees. A change that differentiates them from both past R and D administrations.
I think YOU need to check your Constitution. I was talking about the RUNNING and not the FUNDING. Although, unfortunately Democrats did agree to pay for the torture of Christian refugees and profit for tRump's private detention center cronies.
Nearly $800 a head per day is more than enough to detain one Christian refugee. Too much profit for the private detention center CEOs. Dems shouldn't be funding tRump administration corruption.
So, you are OK with tRump's corruption, but object to Democratic "corruption"? ("Corruption" in quotes because I am not sure what you are referring to, given that the dollars are being spent by the tRump administration).
You read my blog and followed my comments throughout the Obama administration (never once commenting)? Who knew? In any case, republican corruption wins hands down.
A lack of it. Given the fact that it costs significantly less and everyone is covered. That's what happens when you eliminate huge profits for the parasites standing between us and the doctors.
So what you're saying is that you prefer private sector corruption to government corruption? I think you like BOTH, given your support for Dotard. BTW, the Castro brothers have no voters to answer to. Unlike in the US. And Venezuela is a failed petro state. Whereas the US government doesn't rely on oil revenues to stay afloat (instead oil on US government owned land is given away).
If it's a monopoly, what choice do you have? If it's lower priced from the corrupt corporation (and you're on a limited budget) - do you pay more to not support corruption? We don't live in a perfect world. "Don't like it, don't buy it" isn't a solution, it's an excuse to allow said corruption to continue.
Re "it's leased" - I know that. I meant "give away" as in "lease" for an absurdly low price.
Quote: BLM's current regulations for royalty rates collected from onshore oil and gas leases set a flat rate of 12.5 percent... Although BLM is authorized to specify a higher royalty rate, it has not done so.
I did not watch the video, but hasn't your side been claiming that there IS an emergency? Time to cancel tRump's fake national emergency. I mean, if you're now acknowledging that it has been manufactured. Even if you're wrong about who manufactured it. How the Hell could the "squad" manufacture a border crisis by telling the truth about how the Orange Turd administration is abusing Christian Refugees in the concentration camps they've set up?
ReplyDeleteWatch the video so that you can offer an "informed" comments. Uninformed comments are simply half-truths that don't hold up once the entire case gets presented.
ReplyDeleteTrump didn't manufacture the crisis, as alluded to in the title. The video presents "how the squad has manufactured a border crisis" and "why the refugees are being 'abused'".
ReplyDeleteI don't see how the "squad" could have done such a thing. It is the tRump administration that is in charge. Therefore the responsibility is theirs. And, yes, it was the tRump administration that created the crisis. By changing how the government handles such refugees. A change that differentiates them from both past R and D administrations.
ReplyDelete...still uninformed. You should have watched...
ReplyDeleteI am informed concerning who is in charge and therefore who is responsible.
ReplyDeleteDemocrats in Congress aren't responsible for appropriations? Hmmm, perhaps you need to check your Constitution vis "who" is responsible for "what."
ReplyDeleteI think YOU need to check your Constitution. I was talking about the RUNNING and not the FUNDING. Although, unfortunately Democrats did agree to pay for the torture of Christian refugees and profit for tRump's private detention center cronies.
ReplyDeleteHow many new beds did they fund?
ReplyDelete...cuz I know they didn't fund any more mattresses. Gotta torture the detainee's, after all.
ReplyDeleteNearly $800 a head per day is more than enough to detain one Christian refugee. Too much profit for the private detention center CEOs. Dems shouldn't be funding tRump administration corruption.
ReplyDeleteWhy not? Pelosi and Schumer just funded Trump for 2 more years. There's corruption ALL round in THAT deal.
ReplyDeleteSo, you are OK with tRump's corruption, but object to Democratic "corruption"? ("Corruption" in quotes because I am not sure what you are referring to, given that the dollars are being spent by the tRump administration).
ReplyDeleteSince you only complain about Republican corruption, why not?
ReplyDeleteYou read my blog and followed my comments throughout the Obama administration (never once commenting)? Who knew? In any case, republican corruption wins hands down.
ReplyDeleteYou mean for NOT turning our health care system into a single-payer one?
ReplyDeleteThat's not corruption. lol!
It's corruption that is standing in the way of a single payer system. The "campaign contributions" would drop significantly.
ReplyDeleteActually, it's common sense that keeping us away from single payer. You can always go to Venezuela or Cuba if you need a single payer system.
ReplyDeleteA lack of it. Given the fact that it costs significantly less and everyone is covered. That's what happens when you eliminate huge profits for the parasites standing between us and the doctors.
ReplyDeleteWho are the parasites between Venezuelans and their Cuban doctors. Oh that's right, it's their GOVERNMENTS. lol!
ReplyDeleteThe largest known oil reserves in the world... and there's no medicine in the country. And Chavez's daughter has billions in her Swiss bank accounts.
ReplyDelete...as did the Castro brothers.
ReplyDeleteSo what you're saying is that you prefer private sector corruption to government corruption? I think you like BOTH, given your support for Dotard. BTW, the Castro brothers have no voters to answer to. Unlike in the US. And Venezuela is a failed petro state. Whereas the US government doesn't rely on oil revenues to stay afloat (instead oil on US government owned land is given away).
ReplyDeleteIt's leased.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, there's no "being physically forced/compelled" in private sector corruption. Don't like it? Don't buy it.
If it's a monopoly, what choice do you have? If it's lower priced from the corrupt corporation (and you're on a limited budget) - do you pay more to not support corruption? We don't live in a perfect world. "Don't like it, don't buy it" isn't a solution, it's an excuse to allow said corruption to continue.
ReplyDeleteRe "it's leased" - I know that. I meant "give away" as in "lease" for an absurdly low price.
If it's a government monopoly, as you advocate, none.
ReplyDeleteAnd if the lease prices are such good deals and absurdly priced, shouldn't you bid on them and raise the lease price? Foolish you...
Quote: BLM's current regulations for royalty rates collected from onshore oil and gas leases set a flat rate of 12.5 percent... Although BLM is authorized to specify a higher royalty rate, it has not done so.
ReplyDeleteA government monopoly is a monopoly of "we the people". Which is a good thing. Quite unlike a private sector monopoly.
ReplyDelete