Black Voter Suppression?

Daniel Greenfield, "The Abdul El-Sayed and Hong Polls Were Black Voter Suppression by the Media"

If Republicans were doing this, there'd be a civil rights investigation.

Ahead of the Michigan Senate primary, the media pushed polls claiming that Abdul Mohammed El-Sayed was far ahead of Haley Stevens when it actually out to be a fairly close and narrow race.

Now we had a repeat of that in the Wisconsin gubernatorial campaign where polls were projecting a Hong win by between 18 to 25 when Crowley narrowly defeated her in the actual race.

The pollsters will claim that they ‘dropped the ball’, but these are very similar ‘errors’ involving vast leads being assigned to socialist candidates right ahead of the election. The net effect of these polls was voter suppression against Crowley and Stevens voters who were seen as less motivated and driven than the socialist candidates. It worked in the Michigan race, but didn’t in the Wisconsin race.

It’s easy enough to manufacture such a swing by undersampling black and working class voters, the Stevens and Crowley base, while oversampling white leftists, suburban woke moms, college students and so forth

What that amounts to, ironically enough, is the very thing that Dems and the media accuse Republicans of, black voter suppression.

This is the second Dem primary race in which the pollsters engaged in black voter suppression by oversampling white leftists in an attempt to depress black voter turnout for the non-socialist candidates.

If Republicans were doing this, there’d be a civil rights investigation.

But it’s leftists doing this and so it’s treated as some sort of innocent error.

---

Sundance, "Surprise Defeat for DSA Communist Francesca Hong in Wisconsin"

The DSA Communists are claiming election rigging in Wisconsin as Francesca Hong has been defeated by DNC party approved candidate David Crowley.

The current status of the race is Crowley with 39.78% (313,321) and Hong with 39.37% (310,110). Crowley leading by more than three thousand votes

The reason for the apoplexy is that all polling showed Hong with an easy 20-to-25-point lead heading into election day.

State Navigate polling had Francesca Hong +22, Public Policy Polling had predicted Hong +18, Marquette University polling (the gold standard) had Hong +25, then State Navigate polling had Hong +29, and finally Public Policy Polling had another easy win at Hong +20.

Therefore, the only way the DSA Communists can reconcile the outcome of Hong losing is to believe that some other malevolent force was involved in the actual counting of the ballots.

Malevolent force below the fold:

Yup. Missed it by this much.