Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Monday, March 2, 2026
Will Trump Retire to Israel in 2028?
Has Nutty-Yahoo Offered him Asylum from Future Democratic Party Lawfare?
Why, Donald?
20 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I posted it because everyone on the left gives a hoot in hell whenever the polls are low. But, when they are higher, the left don't give a hoot in hell. Funny though how the left claimed that most Americans are against Trump's "military action" and yet now you're saying it in response to higher polls, claiming that's why Trump did it.
Let the Iranian Leaders that are left, and the American “Trump-Haters” all know that this will be the last time that you will be able to Threaten Us, or have the Capacity to throw One more Missels at anyone.
"Has Nutty-Yahoo Offered him Asylum from Future Democratic Party Lawfare?"
You mean asylum from future accountability. But, for the most part, Tucker is correct. Except the past example of where things are 100 percent the opposite of what really happened. I was waiting for examples, but he gave none. And he acts like lying and creating an entirely new narrative that's false is something he objects to. When it's only that he doesn't like this narrative. He does love false narratives and has actively participated in pushing them. So... give me a break.
Such as this one... "all hopes of theirs getting nukes were destroyed last June", which was false. Many experts said what donald trump did created a setback for them and nothing more.
Are neocons unhappy that donald trump ordered Iran attacked? You laughed at the prospect that donald trump would do what neocons wanted, yet it seems he did. Unless you think that an attack on Iran by the US is a "neocon nightmare". Do you?
This just in -- the blog Turd Mystere has acknowledged and endorsed donald trump's plan to destroy the United States.
The post by the blog Turd Mystere is just a link to a music video by Dr Phoxotic titled "Iran (So Far Away) - Official Music Video", which is an AI parody of the Flock of Seagulls song "I ran". As per the lyrics (pinned at the top by Dr Phoxotic), donald trump (on lead vocals) sings, "Bomb Iran, I'll bomb them night and day -- But destroy USA".
donald trump is definitely trying to destroy the USA. Will this do it? Oil prices (and thus all prices) will go up for sure. Terrorism attacks by Iran and it's proxies are a strong possibility. Sounds to me like Mystere is endorsing all of this. Or it could be that he is simply a complete moron. I'm thinking that BOTH are true.
btw, all the comments I see on the YouTube page for this video look like they are from people who think a song in which donald trump sings about destroying the United States is awesome (the destroying, not the admitting). So, more morons and/or America haters. I've always thought that donald trump got elected due to an increase in the number of morons in the United States... and I think this is yet more proof that I was correct.
I Congress was not wrong for us Americans to get involved in Korea, or in Vietnam, or even in Iraq, or Afghanistan. And Barrack Obama did NOT seek prior Congressional approval when he bombed Syria, and Libya, or in Yemen, or Pakistan, or Iraq, or Somalia, but he did bomb them didnt he!
And just for Your Information Congress does allows the President to take military action without prior authorization from Congress if Americans are in danger and that their safty is at risk. They just need Congress to be informed 48 hours of troops to be on the ground, and the President must withdraw the troops after 60 days unless Congress approves an extension.
And for You're information the Iran nuclear deal gave them a pathway to a nuclear bomb. Obama gave them the Billions of dollars to help them develop one.
You people are idiots because you assume there is no clear plan in dealing with Iran, but there has been one all along - Iran must never be allowed to develop one ! Also President Trump gave them the opportunity to negotiate but they did not want to , they choose to rather to call his bluff So they attacked our ships and our Military bases in the region killing some of our Military personnel, so we did act, and here we ste!
Their entire nuclear program was destroyed, and much more , and we ste far from over They are NEVER going to continue persuing getting a nuclear weapon age. And if you don't believe these results it really doesn’t matter. Because You and every other Democrat eho didn’t believe President Trump was going to invade Venezuela, and now Iran , and bring us into a long term war that will never happen. What did happen is that the entire world saw the Iraian snd the Venezuelan people dancing in the streets with joy when they learned that the Dictators were gone. Now look at the people of Iran, they too are dancing in the streets with news of the collapse of that Crazy oppressive regime that has terrorized and murdered tens of thousands of their people and Americans over the past 47 years.is Gone!
So you Ptogressive Trump Haters csn Stop your lies. Stop bitching about Trump because Trump is doing exactly what we elected him to do and the woke world is better off without those Tyrants. Do you understand that Dave Dubya??
Minus: Trump betrayed MAGA. He gave the Neocons their war. Now he's their "dreamboat".
LOL! donald trump did not betray maga. Maga was always a collation of White Supremacist dupes (and other morons) who believed his lies. You acknowledged that donald trump is a liar, when you called him "the Prince". You're just upset that you fell for a trump lie. Due to convincing yourself that you knew what trump's game actually was.
This would be freaking hilarious if it wasn't so tragic. You praised donald trump for being a liar over and over with your "acta non verba" and labeling of him as The Prince. And now that it is clear that YOU are one of the people who was lied to, you can't admit it.
Via Copilot...
🧠 Why someone can’t admit they were lied to...
Three overlapping mechanisms tend to show up in situations like the one you’re describing:
👉1. Cognitive dissonance. This happens when new information (“the leader I trusted did something I thought they’d never do”) clashes with an existing belief (“this leader is consistent and aligned with my values”).
To reduce the discomfort, people often: reinterpret the new information, shift blame, create a new narrative (“they betrayed us”).
This preserves the original belief without having to confront the possibility of deception.
👉2. Identity-protective reasoning. Political identity is often tied to self‑concept, community, and belonging.
Admitting “I was lied to” can feel like: admitting personal error. Losing social standing. Threatening group identity.
So the mind chooses an interpretation that protects the self (“I was betrayed”) rather than one that threatens it (“I was fooled”).
👉3. Motivated reasoning... People tend to accept information that supports their worldview and reject information that threatens it.
When a leader’s actions contradict prior expectations, supporters may reinterpret the leader’s past statements, emphasize different parts of their record, or shift to a narrative that preserves loyalty or dignity.
“Betrayal” becomes a psychologically safer frame than “I misjudged them”.
🔄 Why “betrayal” feels safer than “I was lied to”...
The difference between these two interpretations is huge:
“I was lied to” implies the person was deceived, misled, or naïve.
“I was betrayed” implies the person was loyal, consistent, and principled -- and someone else violated that loyalty.
One interpretation threatens the ego; the other protects it.
This is why people across the political spectrum -- left, right, center -- often frame disillusionment as betrayal rather than deception.
🧩 Why this dynamic is especially strong in political contexts...
Political commitments often involve: long-term emotional investment. Group identity. Moral narratives. A sense of “choosing the right side”.
When a leader’s actions contradict expectations, supporters face a psychological fork...
Option A: “I misunderstood them”.
Option B: “They changed".
Option B preserves dignity and identity, so it’s the one most people choose.
🧠 The term that best fits your scenario... Given the pattern you’re describing—where someone believed a leader held certain positions, then reframes contradictory actions as “betrayal” rather than “I was misled”—the closest psychological terms are:
Cognitive dissonance.
Identity-protective cognition.
Motivated reasoning.
Denial (in some cases).🛑
The bottom line is that there was no "betrayal", because donald trump was never against foreign wars (wherever they take place). He lied about being against the war in Afghanistan and Iraq -- to take out Jeb Bush and because it worked for him, the American people not liking how those wars turned out. He opposed the war in Ukraine because he was on Putin's side (and wants Putin to win).
Remember that he warned about Democratic presidents starting a war with Iran and said that would indicate a failure of leadership? Well, he was lying. Though he might have believed it at the time. The point is, he says what he believes will give him the advantage and NOT because he had any prior held beliefs that he "betrayed".
"Now look at the people of Iran, they too are dancing in the streets with news of the collapse of that Crazy oppressive regime that has terrorized and murdered tens of thousands of their people and Americans over the past 47 years.is Gone!"
Except it isn't gone. There has been no confirmation of this. In fact, I very seriously doubt there ever will be such a confirmation. Instead I'm expecting a confirmation that the Iranian regime is still in charge and has murdered any Iranian citizens that took donald trump's advice to rise up and take over their government. However many may try (if any) a significant number of them will be slaughtered to make an example of them.
btw, I'm not supporting the oppressive Iranian regime. I only think that this isn't going to get rid of it. It will harm them. They will rebuild and be more determined than ever before to exact revenge. Who knows what terrorist attacks will be forthcoming. But I think there will be such attacks. That is something the actions of donald trump have guaranteed.
Minus: Starting another forever war is stupidity on steroids.
It is. But his promise not to was always a lie. One you believed. Now you're trying to wriggle out of YOUR accountability in voting for him. You were convinced this was something he would not do. But that wasn't true. This was always in the cards as a possibility. Because donald trump has no philosophy he is (or was adhering to). Except "donald trump first" (not the made up "Donroe Doctrine"). He was NEVER "America first". He isn't "Israel first" either. He is simply a corrupt narcissistic liar. And you strongly argued otherwise. Now you think you can just walk away with no accountability for your past support because you were "betrayed". Except you were not. You were duped. But you clearly aren't going to admit it.
Minus: They don't, and all hopes of theirs getting nukes were destroyed last June.
That Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated" was an obvious lie. Also a lie that donald trump himself has admitted was a lie. Via his negotiations with Iranian officials to not enrich uranium in the future. According to you, he might have well have been negotiating with them to ensure they never developed a space program wherein they would send astronauts to the moon who would get there by jumping really high.
Rubio gave the reason for the betrayal in a press conference. Iran's plans were to strike the US and Gulf State assets regardless of who attacked them, and Israel was planning to attack regardless. Trump's advisors told him that the retaliatory strikes would be more damaging to us if the US didn't join Israel in the 1st strike.
I would have told Israel to shove their first strike up their asses and hung them out to dry if/when they attacked Iran. But Trump's a softie.
Minus: Rubio gave the reason for the betrayal in a press conference. Iran's plans were to strike the US and Gulf State assets regardless of who attacked them...
LOL! You are a very persistent sucker. Even when you break with trump, you still believe Turd-2 lies.
Pentagon tells Congress no sign that Iran was going to attack US first, sources say... Trump administration officials acknowledged in closed-door briefings with congressional staff that there was no intelligence suggesting Iran planned to attack US forces first, two people familiar with the matter say.link
The statement is true from an American perspective. If Israel attacked Iran, Iran would strike American and Gulf State assets, even if the US had not participated in the original Israeli attack... so yes, Iran would strike America first.
20 comments:
I posted it because everyone on the left gives a hoot in hell whenever the polls are low. But, when they are higher, the left don't give a hoot in hell.
Funny though how the left claimed that most Americans are against Trump's "military action" and yet now you're saying it in response to higher polls, claiming that's why Trump did it.
Look at the Damage that Iran is doing now, just imagine if they had Nuclear Capabilities?
And let that Sink In to all you Dummies on the Left as well
They don't, and all hopes of theirs getting nukes were destroyed last June.
Let the Iranian Leaders that are left, and the American “Trump-Haters” all know that this will be the last time that you will be able to Threaten Us, or have the Capacity to throw One more Missels at anyone.
"Has Nutty-Yahoo Offered him Asylum from Future Democratic Party Lawfare?"
You mean asylum from future accountability. But, for the most part, Tucker is correct. Except the past example of where things are 100 percent the opposite of what really happened. I was waiting for examples, but he gave none. And he acts like lying and creating an entirely new narrative that's false is something he objects to. When it's only that he doesn't like this narrative. He does love false narratives and has actively participated in pushing them. So... give me a break.
Such as this one... "all hopes of theirs getting nukes were destroyed last June", which was false. Many experts said what donald trump did created a setback for them and nothing more.
Here is another example of a false narrative.
"lol! DJT is a neocon nightmare".
Are neocons unhappy that donald trump ordered Iran attacked? You laughed at the prospect that donald trump would do what neocons wanted, yet it seems he did. Unless you think that an attack on Iran by the US is a "neocon nightmare". Do you?
This just in -- the blog Turd Mystere has acknowledged and endorsed donald trump's plan to destroy the United States.
The post by the blog Turd Mystere is just a link to a music video by Dr Phoxotic titled "Iran (So Far Away) - Official Music Video", which is an AI parody of the Flock of Seagulls song "I ran". As per the lyrics (pinned at the top by Dr Phoxotic), donald trump (on lead vocals) sings, "Bomb Iran, I'll bomb them night and day -- But destroy USA".
donald trump is definitely trying to destroy the USA. Will this do it? Oil prices (and thus all prices) will go up for sure. Terrorism attacks by Iran and it's proxies are a strong possibility. Sounds to me like Mystere is endorsing all of this. Or it could be that he is simply a complete moron. I'm thinking that BOTH are true.
btw, all the comments I see on the YouTube page for this video look like they are from people who think a song in which donald trump sings about destroying the United States is awesome (the destroying, not the admitting). So, more morons and/or America haters. I've always thought that donald trump got elected due to an increase in the number of morons in the United States... and I think this is yet more proof that I was correct.
I Congress was not wrong for us Americans to get involved in Korea, or in Vietnam, or even in Iraq, or Afghanistan. And Barrack Obama did NOT seek prior Congressional approval when he bombed Syria, and Libya, or in Yemen, or Pakistan, or Iraq, or Somalia, but he did bomb them didnt he!
And just for Your Information Congress does allows the President to take military action without prior authorization from Congress if Americans are in danger and that their safty is at risk.
They just need Congress to be informed 48 hours of troops to be on the ground, and the President must withdraw the troops after 60 days unless Congress approves an extension.
And for You're information the Iran nuclear deal gave them a pathway to a nuclear bomb. Obama gave them the Billions of dollars to help them develop one.
You people are idiots because you assume there is no clear plan in dealing with Iran, but there has been one all along - Iran must never be allowed to develop one ! Also President Trump gave them the opportunity to negotiate but they did not want to , they choose to rather to call his bluff So they attacked our ships and our Military bases in the region killing some of our Military personnel, so we did act, and here we ste!
Their entire nuclear program was destroyed, and much more , and we ste far from over They are NEVER going to continue persuing getting a nuclear weapon age.
And if you don't believe these results it really doesn’t matter. Because You and every other Democrat eho didn’t believe President Trump was going to invade Venezuela, and now Iran , and bring us
into a long term war that will never happen. What did happen is that the entire world saw the Iraian snd the Venezuelan people dancing in the streets with joy when they learned that the Dictators were gone. Now look at the people of Iran, they too are dancing in the streets with news of the collapse of that Crazy oppressive regime that has terrorized and murdered tens of thousands of their people and Americans over the past 47 years.is Gone!
So you Ptogressive Trump Haters csn Stop your lies. Stop bitching about Trump because Trump is doing exactly what we elected him to do and the woke world is better off without those Tyrants. Do you understand that Dave Dubya??
Trump betrayed MAGA. He gave the Neocons their war. Now he's their "dreamboat".
Minus: Trump betrayed MAGA. He gave the Neocons their war. Now he's their "dreamboat".
LOL! donald trump did not betray maga. Maga was always a collation of White Supremacist dupes (and other morons) who believed his lies. You acknowledged that donald trump is a liar, when you called him "the Prince". You're just upset that you fell for a trump lie. Due to convincing yourself that you knew what trump's game actually was.
This would be freaking hilarious if it wasn't so tragic. You praised donald trump for being a liar over and over with your "acta non verba" and labeling of him as The Prince. And now that it is clear that YOU are one of the people who was lied to, you can't admit it.
Via Copilot...
🧠 Why someone can’t admit they were lied to...
Three overlapping mechanisms tend to show up in situations like the one you’re describing:
👉1. Cognitive dissonance. This happens when new information (“the leader I trusted did something I thought they’d never do”) clashes with an existing belief (“this leader is consistent and aligned with my values”).
To reduce the discomfort, people often: reinterpret the new information, shift blame, create a new narrative (“they betrayed us”).
This preserves the original belief without having to confront the possibility of deception.
👉2. Identity-protective reasoning. Political identity is often tied to self‑concept, community, and belonging.
Admitting “I was lied to” can feel like: admitting personal error. Losing social standing. Threatening group identity.
So the mind chooses an interpretation that protects the self (“I was betrayed”) rather than one that threatens it (“I was fooled”).
👉3. Motivated reasoning... People tend to accept information that supports their worldview and reject information that threatens it.
When a leader’s actions contradict prior expectations, supporters may reinterpret the leader’s past statements, emphasize different parts of their record, or shift to a narrative that preserves loyalty or dignity.
“Betrayal” becomes a psychologically safer frame than “I misjudged them”.
(continued in next comment).
(continued from prior comment).
🔄 Why “betrayal” feels safer than “I was lied to”...
The difference between these two interpretations is huge:
“I was lied to” implies the person was deceived, misled, or naïve.
“I was betrayed” implies the person was loyal, consistent, and principled -- and someone else violated that loyalty.
One interpretation threatens the ego; the other protects it.
This is why people across the political spectrum -- left, right, center -- often frame disillusionment as betrayal rather than deception.
🧩 Why this dynamic is especially strong in political contexts...
Political commitments often involve: long-term emotional investment. Group identity. Moral narratives. A sense of “choosing the right side”.
When a leader’s actions contradict expectations, supporters face a psychological fork...
Option A: “I misunderstood them”.
Option B: “They changed".
Option B preserves dignity and identity, so it’s the one most people choose.
🧠 The term that best fits your scenario... Given the pattern you’re describing—where someone believed a leader held certain positions, then reframes contradictory actions as “betrayal” rather than “I was misled”—the closest psychological terms are:
Cognitive dissonance.
Identity-protective cognition.
Motivated reasoning.
Denial (in some cases).🛑
The bottom line is that there was no "betrayal", because donald trump was never against foreign wars (wherever they take place). He lied about being against the war in Afghanistan and Iraq -- to take out Jeb Bush and because it worked for him, the American people not liking how those wars turned out. He opposed the war in Ukraine because he was on Putin's side (and wants Putin to win).
Remember that he warned about Democratic presidents starting a war with Iran and said that would indicate a failure of leadership? Well, he was lying. Though he might have believed it at the time. The point is, he says what he believes will give him the advantage and NOT because he had any prior held beliefs that he "betrayed".
👆Moron👆
"Now look at the people of Iran, they too are dancing in the streets with news of the collapse of that Crazy oppressive regime that has terrorized and murdered tens of thousands of their people and Americans over the past 47 years.is Gone!"
Except it isn't gone. There has been no confirmation of this. In fact, I very seriously doubt there ever will be such a confirmation. Instead I'm expecting a confirmation that the Iranian regime is still in charge and has murdered any Iranian citizens that took donald trump's advice to rise up and take over their government. However many may try (if any) a significant number of them will be slaughtered to make an example of them.
btw, I'm not supporting the oppressive Iranian regime. I only think that this isn't going to get rid of it. It will harm them. They will rebuild and be more determined than ever before to exact revenge. Who knows what terrorist attacks will be forthcoming. But I think there will be such attacks. That is something the actions of donald trump have guaranteed.
His acta betrayed his MAGA verba.
I don't care about his words. I care about his actions. Starting another forever war is stupidity on steroids.
Minus: Starting another forever war is stupidity on steroids.
It is. But his promise not to was always a lie. One you believed. Now you're trying to wriggle out of YOUR accountability in voting for him. You were convinced this was something he would not do. But that wasn't true. This was always in the cards as a possibility. Because donald trump has no philosophy he is (or was adhering to). Except "donald trump first" (not the made up "Donroe Doctrine"). He was NEVER "America first". He isn't "Israel first" either. He is simply a corrupt narcissistic liar. And you strongly argued otherwise. Now you think you can just walk away with no accountability for your past support because you were "betrayed". Except you were not. You were duped. But you clearly aren't going to admit it.
Minus: They don't, and all hopes of theirs getting nukes were destroyed last June.
That Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated" was an obvious lie. Also a lie that donald trump himself has admitted was a lie. Via his negotiations with Iranian officials to not enrich uranium in the future. According to you, he might have well have been negotiating with them to ensure they never developed a space program wherein they would send astronauts to the moon who would get there by jumping really high.
Rubio gave the reason for the betrayal in a press conference. Iran's plans were to strike the US and Gulf State assets regardless of who attacked them, and Israel was planning to attack regardless. Trump's advisors told him that the retaliatory strikes would be more damaging to us if the US didn't join Israel in the 1st strike.
I would have told Israel to shove their first strike up their asses and hung them out to dry if/when they attacked Iran. But Trump's a softie.
Clip of Rubio @ 1:20
Minus: Rubio gave the reason for the betrayal in a press conference. Iran's plans were to strike the US and Gulf State assets regardless of who attacked them...
LOL! You are a very persistent sucker. Even when you break with trump, you still believe Turd-2 lies.
Pentagon tells Congress no sign that Iran was going to attack US first, sources say... Trump administration officials acknowledged in closed-door briefings with congressional staff that there was no intelligence suggesting Iran planned to attack US forces first, two people familiar with the matter say. link
The statement is true from an American perspective. If Israel attacked Iran, Iran would strike American and Gulf State assets, even if the US had not participated in the original Israeli attack... so yes, Iran would strike America first.
Post a Comment