Is Heart of a Dog anti-communist? In Heart of a Dog, Bulgakov satirizes the communist revolution in the Soviet Union and the concept of a New Soviet man, and criticizes the science and practice of eugenics.29 трав. 2017 р. Heart of a Dog (1925), by Mikhail Bulgakov Embryo Project Encyclopedia - Arizona State University https://embryo.asu.edu › pages › heart-dog-1925-mikhai...
Not exactly Dr. Zhivago, but interesting. Are you familiar with the Czech Director Milos Forman's "Fireman's Ball". It goes much further in its' destruction of the image of the "the noble people" for which communism served. The "sacred" communist idol....
...and of coarse the unspoken truth of "wokeness" (cultural Marxism) is that the white race is uniquely racist, vicious, and violent. And for that reason, it must be suppressed. we're all Kurtz... you see?
"I had to be restrained, because I was doing too much good." Kurtz, "Heart of Darkness"
You're the one who is pretending. Pretending that I support neoliberalism. I acknowledge the fact that donald trump is a moron and his tariffs won't produce the results you want. QED I "must" be a neoliberal. Even though I've told you numerous times how I think the US should go about achieving those results.
And you also pretend to not be a White Supremacist.
Minus: ...of coarse the unspoken truth of "wokeness" (cultural Marxism) is that the white race is uniquely racist, vicious, and violent. And for that reason, it must be suppressed.
Of course what you just wrote is complete BS.
Copilot: That comment carries a heavy dose of ideological distortion and inflammatory rhetoric. It’s built on a few key moves that are worth unpacking...
🔍 What's going on beneath the surface.
Mislabeling “wokeness” as cultural Marxism: This is a common rhetorical strategy used in far-right or anti-progressive spaces. “Wokeness” broadly refers to social awareness around racism, gender equality, and other civil rights issues. By relabeling it “cultural Marxism,” the writer is invoking a conspiracy theory that falsely suggests there's a coordinated ideological plot to undermine Western civilization. It's a term rooted in Cold War paranoia and later repurposed by white nationalist discourse.
Painting an entire racial group as uniquely evil: Claiming that “the white race is uniquely racist, vicious, and violent” is not just inaccurate -- it's biologically essentialist and morally nihilistic. There’s no credible evidence or ethical justification for generalizing any group in such absolute terms. Racism and violence exist across all societies and historical contexts. Reducing it to race alone obscures systems, power structures, and historical nuance.
Fear-mongering through language like “must be suppressed”: This kind of framing suggests that advocacy for equality is actually a call for vengeance or domination. It's a rhetorical tactic that casts progressive movements as existential threats, which can stoke fear, resentment, and radicalization.
🧠 What's missing from this worldview.
It assumes anti-racism is anti-white, which is intellectually dishonest.
It ignores the rich diversity of voices within progressive movements -- including white allies.
It flattens complex socio-historical dynamics into cartoonish binaries of good vs. evil.
This kind of blog comment isn’t just provocative -- it’s designed to provoke, stir up grievance, and construct an identity around perceived victimhood. [end]
Minus: I don't disagree with the premise, merely the scope. It's a racial thing all right... but it applies to the entire HUMAN race, not just the white one.
Of course. A lot of humans are terrible and the terrible ones aren't all White. But, where Whites are the majority, they have the upper hand when it comes to inflicting terribleness on others. But you'll probably say I'm "pretending" to agree, yes? I think it's only Whites who are terrible and must be lying about believing otherwise @@
11 comments:
Intellectual left???)))))
You need to read/watch Bulgakov's "Dog's Heart". ;-p
Is Heart of a Dog anti-communist?
In Heart of a Dog, Bulgakov satirizes the communist revolution in the Soviet Union and the concept of a New Soviet man, and criticizes the science and practice of eugenics.29 трав. 2017 р.
Heart of a Dog (1925), by Mikhail Bulgakov
Embryo Project Encyclopedia - Arizona State University
https://embryo.asu.edu › pages › heart-dog-1925-mikhai...
Here. TYPICAL LEFTISTS(with english subs)<\a>
I heard today that Stalin wanted to cross-breed peasants with apes...
Yeah. To confirm Darwin's claim about humans evolved from apes.
Plus... gumbas are more docile. ;-p
Not exactly Dr. Zhivago, but interesting. Are you familiar with the Czech Director Milos Forman's "Fireman's Ball". It goes much further in its' destruction of the image of the "the noble people" for which communism served. The "sacred" communist idol....
That's the thing about ideology. It perverts everything in service to its' cause.... especially "truth".
...and of coarse the unspoken truth of "wokeness" (cultural Marxism) is that the white race is uniquely racist, vicious, and violent. And for that reason, it must be suppressed. we're all Kurtz... you see?
"I had to be restrained, because I was doing too much good."
Kurtz, "Heart of Darkness"
I don't disagree with the premise, merely the scope. It's a racial thing all right... but it applies to the entire HUMAN race, not just the white one.
You're the one who is pretending. Pretending that I support neoliberalism. I acknowledge the fact that donald trump is a moron and his tariffs won't produce the results you want. QED I "must" be a neoliberal. Even though I've told you numerous times how I think the US should go about achieving those results.
And you also pretend to not be a White Supremacist.
Minus: ...of coarse the unspoken truth of "wokeness" (cultural Marxism) is that the white race is uniquely racist, vicious, and violent. And for that reason, it must be suppressed.
Of course what you just wrote is complete BS.
Copilot: That comment carries a heavy dose of ideological distortion and inflammatory rhetoric. It’s built on a few key moves that are worth unpacking...
🔍 What's going on beneath the surface.
Mislabeling “wokeness” as cultural Marxism: This is a common rhetorical strategy used in far-right or anti-progressive spaces. “Wokeness” broadly refers to social awareness around racism, gender equality, and other civil rights issues. By relabeling it “cultural Marxism,” the writer is invoking a conspiracy theory that falsely suggests there's a coordinated ideological plot to undermine Western civilization. It's a term rooted in Cold War paranoia and later repurposed by white nationalist discourse.
Painting an entire racial group as uniquely evil: Claiming that “the white race is uniquely racist, vicious, and violent” is not just inaccurate -- it's biologically essentialist and morally nihilistic. There’s no credible evidence or ethical justification for generalizing any group in such absolute terms. Racism and violence exist across all societies and historical contexts. Reducing it to race alone obscures systems, power structures, and historical nuance.
Fear-mongering through language like “must be suppressed”: This kind of framing suggests that advocacy for equality is actually a call for vengeance or domination. It's a rhetorical tactic that casts progressive movements as existential threats, which can stoke fear, resentment, and radicalization.
🧠 What's missing from this worldview.
It assumes anti-racism is anti-white, which is intellectually dishonest.
It ignores the rich diversity of voices within progressive movements -- including white allies.
It flattens complex socio-historical dynamics into cartoonish binaries of good vs. evil.
This kind of blog comment isn’t just provocative -- it’s designed to provoke, stir up grievance, and construct an identity around perceived victimhood. [end]
Minus: I don't disagree with the premise, merely the scope. It's a racial thing all right... but it applies to the entire HUMAN race, not just the white one.
Of course. A lot of humans are terrible and the terrible ones aren't all White. But, where Whites are the majority, they have the upper hand when it comes to inflicting terribleness on others. But you'll probably say I'm "pretending" to agree, yes? I think it's only Whites who are terrible and must be lying about believing otherwise @@
Post a Comment