Abbe Lowell, an attorney for Hunter Biden: [we] do not confirm Mac Isaac's or others' versions of a so-called laptop ... [we] address their conduct of seeking, manipulating and disseminating what they allege to be Mr. Biden's personal data, wherever they claim to have gotten it".
Actual confessions...
donald tRump Junior confesses to Russian payoffs: "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. ... We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia".
Putin puppet Jimmy Dore confesses to sexual harassment: "I wrote her [Ana Kasparian] a card saying sorry... that was inappropriate. You don't have to worry about that happening again. I won't comment on your clothes anymore".
Putin puppet Minus confesses that Hunter's "laptop" is Russian disinformation: "...unless you control the sources of photos or are a witness, the news is susceptible to being tampered with and edited" :P
According to a Bloomberg investigation into Trump World Tower, which broke ground in 1998, “a third of units sold on floors 76 through 83 by 2004 involved people or limited liability companies connected to Russia and neighboring states”. Reuters, meanwhile, has reported that “at least 63 individuals with Russian passports or addresses have bought at least $98.4 million worth of property in seven Trump-branded luxury towers in southern Florida”.
Sounds like you can prove Hunter Biden is guilty of accepting bribes and cutting in his father. Given his "admission" I assume criminal charges will be handed down soon?
LOL! There isn't going to be an "Congressional investigations". The Senate is still under Democratic control and they won't be participating. The only purpose of the coming House witch hunt is to harm Joe Biden's 2024 reelection chances. Hunter Biden is likely worried about further embarrassment and possibly moderate trouble. Certainly not "big trouble".
What we really need to investigate is tRump family corruption. Jared is clearly bigly guilty of it. Is Jared Kushner a CI?
Rudy Giuliani and John Paul Mac Isaac (along with any co-conspirators) would be in big trouble if there was a real Congressional Investigation into their laptop. And by "big trouble" I mean lengthy prison sentences.
LOL! How did the Durham investigation payback work out?
If Hunter is subpoenaed by the House republiturds will he show up? Subpoenas were ignored when the Democrats controlled the House. Even if he does show up, he can just take the 5th in response to every question. republiturds did it. Will AG Garland have Hunter arrested if he ignores a subpoena?
\\The only purpose of the coming House witch hunt is to harm Joe Biden's 2024 reelection chances.
And isn't all that "DD's misdeeds" is just the same? As there is no perspective in court. And ALL (sane?) Dems know it. There was silent agreement -- to continue haunting DD with it TILL next elections. Isn't that as it is... in a nutshel? Ah, Dervy? (see, I even used honorifics here) ;-)
\\What we really need to investigate is tRump family corruption.
And why you don't? ;-P (sneaky question... look above)
Qtard: And isn't all that "DD's misdeeds" is just the same?
To you it is. Because you don't care about facts. You've admitted it. Sane Democrats know that "DD misdeeds" aren't a "witch hunt". Because the evidence exists that says he did what is claimed (collude with Russia, violate emoluments clause and do other things to corruptly profit from the presidency, etc). Qtard says the facts don't count because "someone said something something" and republicans are "Dem-sources".
Qtard: "...investigate is tRump family corruption"... And why you don't?
The turd state covers up dotard donald's corruption.
And in fact too. Becuase I em uninterested bystender. Who can look at it objectively. Well, no... I am biased. I am fuckingly biased.
I am consciously and subjectively PRO JUSTICE. Means, that principle Justice MUST prevail is not mere lip sink for me. BUT DEFINING PRINCIPLE.
\\Because you don't care about facts.
I CARE. But only about REAL facts. Ones one can... and might, no -- MUST, present. In Court. Period.
But you are one, who likes you non-facts, you dem-dogmas, you political slurr... and trying to call it "fact-based".
You disgusting, De-Ru-Pi. ;-P
\\Sane Democrats know that "DD misdeeds" aren't a "witch hunt".
Yep. Because they KNOW, that that is a way of Sure Win for them. ;-P Even if it nothing else but mere smearing opponent in feces. ;-P
\\Because the evidence exists
Yeah... there, somewhere, evidances of anythiung and everything exist... :-)))))))))))) That's for sure.
And you are Boltsman Brain Derpy. ;-P :-)))))))))))))
\\Qtard says the facts don't count because "someone said something something" and republicans are "Dem-sources".
NO. Because mere quality of that "facts" is such, that you NOT ONLY FREAKINGLY UNABLE to present em IN COURT... you cannot EVEN start compaiugn in media... with that non-dumning non-facts. ;-P
\\The turd state covers up dotard donald's corruption.
Ho-ho-ho... and now you mirroring MAGA-turds... with their "deep state did it". :-))))))))))))))
You trully and really are nothing but losy and brainless... a-MAGA-turd. :-)))))))))))
The USSR had it's own version as well. It was called the Communist Party. In America, it's the UniParty...
The formula of the Party-State, as the defining feature of twentieth-century Communism, thus needs to be complicated: there is always a gap between Party and State, corresponding to the gap between the Ego-Ideal (symbolic Law) and the Superego, for the Party remains the half-hidden obscene shadow which redoubles the State structure. There is here no distance, its organization embodying a fundamental distrust of the State organs and mechanisms, as if they need to be continually kept in check. A true twentieth-century-style Communist never fully accepts the State: there always has to be a vigilant agency outside of State control, with the power to intervene in the State's business. - Slavoj Zizek, "Living in the End Times"
Qtard's claim that he is "consciously and subjectively pro justice" is bullplop. The justice system said dotard donald's lawsuit alleging that HRC (and other Dems) framed him for colluding with Russia was "A litany of threadbare allegations... unsupported by any facts".
Qtard says the (supported by the evidence) collusion allegations are "but mere smearing opponent in feces" BY DEMOCRATS! While the judge said the lawsuit "exhibited a continuing pattern of misuse of the courts [and tRump filed the suit] in order to dishonestly advance a political narrative". The OPPOSITE of what Qtard claims (tRump is smearing the feces).
"Trump had sought $70m in damages". Instead tRump was ordered to "cover the defendants' legal fees and costs [of] $937,989.39" :P
Qtard lied: But only about REAL facts. Ones one ... MUST present. In Court. Period.
Justice prevailed in this case. Real facts were presented IN COURT, yet Qtard rejects the findings of the judge. As per Qtard, tRump bringing the frivolous lawsuit is proof he has "balls". The balls to lie about not colluding and smear Democrats with feces. Which Qtard admires.
What happens if/when Special Counsel Jack Smith charges donald tRump? What about all the convictions in court (for seditious conspiracy) of insurrectionists dotard donald sent to the Capitol to overthrow democracy? We ALL saw it as it was broadcast on TV.
Qtard will probably deny any responsibility falls on dotard donald because "dotard donald only wanted people to march to the Capitol to protest peacefully" or some other bullplop (like Minus does). Even though tRump said people needed to "fight like hell" and Rudy Giuliani said it was going to be "trial by combat".
Qtard might say that republiturds didn't convict him in the Senate after he was impeached and therefore he is innocent. Because cheering dotard donald for (so far) evading justice is Qtard's MO.
I love how dervy makes the immediate mistake of equating "justice" with the "justice system". The "justice system" seldom provides "justice". It does even worse at providing "class action" (aka social) "Justice" (every member of the litigation "class" gets an equal share of compensation, despite being disproportionaly impacted).
Qtard: "I CARE. But only about REAL facts. Ones one can... and might, no -- MUST, present. In Court. Period".
"In court" = justice system.
I never agreed with Qtard that dotard donald is innocent of Russian collusion (given that a court hasn't found him guilty of collusion). Try paying attention.
Trump Administration Revives Support for New FBI Headquarters. President Donald Trump's administration on Monday revived its support for construction of a new FBI headquarters, saying it planned to ask Congress in 2018 for the remaining $2.175 billion needed to help pay for it.
\\I love how dervy makes the immediate mistake of equating "justice" with the "justice system".
And how is this mistake?
In religious mind -- it all THE SAME.
Like Pope is THE SAME as Jesus... and vae victis to those who'd try to oppose it. ;-P
\\I never agreed with Qtard that dotard donald is innocent of Russian collusion (given that a court hasn't found him guilty of collusion). Try paying attention.
So??? People CAN BE assigned to be guilty... even WITHOUT correct and open trial in court? Am I understanding what you babbling THE RIGHT WAY, ah De-Ru-Pi???
\\The USSR had it's own version as well. It was called the Communist Party.
And when only it'll grow TOO boring to you... to demonstrate your ignorance? :-))) Rethorical question. SARCASM!!!
While it is know to all -- that ws Che-Ka. ;-P Emergency Committe. ;-P
\\There is here no distance, its organization embodying a fundamental distrust of the State organs and mechanisms, as if they need to be continually kept in check. A true twentieth-century-style Communist never fully accepts the State: there always has to be a vigilant agency outside of State control, with the power to intervene in the State's business. - Slavoj Zizek, "Living in the End Times"
Bull crap. :-)))
Com-party was "missing mediator"... and it really did disappeared, in the end of USSR. And it gone broke. ;-P As it was sole glue connecting it.
\\Qtard's claim that he is "consciously and subjectively pro justice" is bullplop.
And you will show it with direct and correct citation, and logical argumentation??? Neee... (Derpy with a Pinnochio nose picture here) :-))))
\\Qtard says the (supported by the evidence) collusion allegations
They are NOT present. Neither in court, nor in the media.
ONLY throught someone's "hearsay". And that someone -- are NOT objective ones, but on the contrary -- VERY subjective and involved.
People tend to devise ANY lie... for their own benefit. Even unconsciously. And ESPECIALLY, when there is NO punishment or risk of that lie being revealed. Period.
\\The OPPOSITE of what Qtard claims (tRump is smearing the feces).
He tryed to use that "feces" in court. MEANS -- he seems like faithfully believed that it was true. Or... believed that that is "plausible" enough.
SEE THE DIFFERENCE???
I'll reveal it to you.
YOU(that somebody-somebody who said that something-something, you trying to fight for so blindly)... neither believe themself that that "something-something" is true. Nor they even believe it "plausible" enough. EVEN for smearing compaign in media.
Means -- it absolutely non-factual bullcrap. EVEN if it have some relation to a Reality (Like Trump really trying to have some support from Putin... or that Putin proposed/gave as a freebie, such support -- which is, how politics works)...
YOU HAVE NO PROOFS!!!
While frantickly trying to play it like you have...
well, the same as ANY and EVERY religious junky out there. ;-P
Wishful/magical/religious thinking. And try to disprove that that is not true. ;-P :-))))
\\Qtard lied: But only about REAL facts. Ones one ... MUST present. In Court. Period.
\\Justice prevailed in this case. Real facts were presente...
Yawn.
That is YOUR open lie and attempt of derailment.
That was NOT the case in question. And you know it. And trying to bend Reality and my claim into a pretcel -- to accomodate to a form your brain ALREADY are. ;-P
\\ The balls to lie about not colluding and smear Democrats with feces. Which Qtard admires.
I just laughing from Dems... who admiring this Trump-power... and wanting it for themself. And screaming as that sissies, when people like I -- truthful and rational -- showing to them that it doesn't work. And will not work.
Because.
dRrump have NO power. He really are that sto-o-o-opid and small minded. To think that that his lies is really truth. :-)))))))))
But... feel yourself free... to show yourself idiot again, and to pretend/claim that this my words are "proof" of my "admiration of DD". :-)))))))))))))))
\\What happens if/when Special Counsel Jack Smith charges donald tRump?
And WHEN??? :-))) For how long we should wait for that to happen???? :-)))))))))))))))
Till time of elections? ;-)
\\What about all the convictions in court (for seditious conspiracy) of insurrectionists dotard donald sent to the Capitol to overthrow democracy? We ALL saw it as it was broadcast on TV.
And? Do you have PROOFS??? Evidances/witnesses eligable for a court? Of dRump's involvment into it? No? Well, that's what I thought. ;-P
\\Qtard might say that republiturds didn't convict him in the Senate after he was impeached and therefore he is innocent. Because cheering dotard donald for (so far) evading justice is Qtard's MO.
Yawn Bullshit. That is you are one cheering for somebody-somebody who saying nothing else but proofless babbling...
derp: The constant repeating of an opinion after facts have proved it incorrect, especially as a rhetorical tactic.
Qtard just keeps screeching "facts aren't facts" and "proof isn't proof". Because Qtard is a wishful/magical/religious thinker.
Qtard asks for a court case, I give him one, and Qtard says "that one doesn't count"... because "That was NOT the case in question. And you know it". I don't. Because it was. And YOU know it. Yet you continue with your failed derp strategy.
Qtard: Do you have PROOFS??? Evidances/witnesses eligable for a court? Of dRump's involvment into it? No? Well, that's what I thought.
Qtard thought wrong. The proof of tRump's involvement in the J6 insurrection was broadcast on TV :P donald tRump's involvement was conclusively established by the J6 House bipartisan select committee. They issued a lengthy report and referred donald tRump to the Justice Department for prosecution :P
\\derp: The constant repeating of an opinion after facts have proved it incorrect, especially as a rhetorical tactic.
Yep. Exactly what YOU do. Here. Fore the several consequting months... and that's while I'm observing it. But I bet you do that for much longer and around much wider audience, isn't it, Derpy?
\\Qtard just keeps screeching "facts aren't facts" and "proof isn't proof". Because Qtard is a wishful/magical/religious thinker.
You are lame Derpy. Try to invent own back bites. Your "no, you are fool" is so childish, and disingenious. ;-P
\\Qtard asks for a court case, I give him one, and Qtard says "that one doesn't count"... because "That was NOT the case in question. And you know it". I don't. Because it was. And YOU know it. Yet you continue with your failed derp strategy.
Of course. Because case (nonexistant) we was discussing -- that is case where dRump would be called to court for HIS own misdeeds. Case where he is on accusing side, or where he is only witness -- totally irrelevant.
Your Captain Obvious. ;-P
\\Qtard: Do you have PROOFS??? Evidances/witnesses eligable for a court? Of dRump's involvment into it? No? Well, that's what I thought.
\\Qtard thought wrong. The proof of tRump's involvement in the J6 insurrection was broadcast on TV
So? Why you STILL not in court??? With that, such apparent, (non)"proofs".
\\ :P donald tRump's involvement was conclusively established by the J6 House bipartisan select committee. They issued a lengthy report and referred donald tRump to the Justice Department for prosecution :P
YEAH. And WHAT court TOOK it as argument? ;-P WHICH prosecutor came to the court with it? ;-P WHAT was (or would be) results of it? ;-P
\\Qtard = untruthful and irrational derp.
As I said -- try to avoid shiny mirroring object, Derp. To not see derps everywhere.
But... looks like you are inclined to live in that room with mirrors :-)))
"Case where he is on accusing side ... totally irrelevant"... Totally relevant. It concerned collusion with Russia. tRump claimed he was "framed" by HRC and others. The judge said he wasn't.
"Why you STILL not in court???"... because the report was JUST released.
"WHICH prosecutor came to the court with it?"... Special Prosecutor Jack Smith is looking at the report.
"WHAT was (or would be) results of it?"... donald tRump's conviction.
"...try to avoid shiny mirroring object, Derp. To not see derps everywhere"... I'm pretty sure I've never seen Qtard's reflection in a shiny mirroring object. No place, let alone everywhere.
\\"Case where he is on accusing side ... totally irrelevant"... Totally relevant. It concerned collusion with Russia. tRump claimed he was "framed" by HRC and others. The judge said he wasn't.
Because. That is NOT court's job... to discern hearsay. To judge someone for their opinion.
THAT IS ONLY IN TOTALITARIAN STATES, courts can throw into jail for wrongly said word. Like it is in Russia. Like it is in China. And... Derpy seems like UNHAPPY, that that is NOT like it is... in USA. Yes, De-Ru-Pi???
LOL! Minus and Qtard, like most rightturds, are bigly magical thinkers. Minus hears imaginary "confessions" and has delusions that tell him the Democratic party is racist, even though a super majority of African Americans vote for the Democratic party.
Meanwhile Qtard keeps screeching about how facts aren't facts and proof isn't proof. Then denies he ever said it. Though I could, no doubt, get him to say it again.
Unless he has changed his mind about the IC and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence committee both concluding there was collusion between the dotard campaign and Russia.
The real "collusion" in American government and politics has always been between foreign oligarch's and governments (like China) putting money into the pockets of Senate Intelligence and Foreign Relation Committee members through their "foundations".
btw - Back in the Reconstruction days through Hoover's presidency, when most African Americans were Republicans, the Jim Crow laws in the South and redlining in the North wasn't racist? Who knew? And why'd the majority switch to voting "Democrat" under Roosevelt? He wasn't a racist pr*ck? He did dole pout a lot of "government handouts", that's for sure.
Nixon ran for President in 1960. The Southern Strategy was devised again in '68 for run number 2. If there was any change in voting pattern, it happened in '64 with Johnson.
\\The real "collusion" in American government and politics has always been between foreign oligarch's and governments (like China) putting money into the pockets of Senate Intelligence and Foreign Relation Committee members through their "foundations".
Hoh... and how happy I am... that that is... NMP. ;-P
\\It musta had something to do with Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater's flaming racism.
Yes. Certainly. I need to be happy. :-)))
\\Meanwhile Qtard keeps screeching about how facts aren't facts and proof isn't proof.
And you can prove it with direct and honest citation? No? Why no? Isn't that would be easy-peasy... but, only if ANYTHING of your derpy smearing would be in any corelation with a Truth... :-)))))))))
\\Unless he has changed his mind about the IC and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence committee both concluding there was collusion between the dotard campaign and Russia.
Aha...
but NEITHER they PROVIDED open to a public and easy to check for yourself FACTS NOR they presented that chain of their inferences IN COURT.
And... most surely, they will NOT do anything like that... up to the time of elections.
And... they'll quickly forget about IT ALL, in the very next day AFTER.
By obvious reason.
I'll say it directly... for foolish Derpy to continue ogling this bone -- BECAUSE, that is all just political campaign of smearing political opponents with feces. Sad, but true.
PS Well, anyway. I would like to see that court. And dRump in chains in result of it. But... I give to it yet smaller and smaller chance... let's say, less then 1%. So, I will not hold my breath waiting for it. NMP, anyway.
"most surely, they will NOT do anything like that"... Of course not. The CIA does not reveal sources and methods. That can result in people getting killed. And/or adversaries changing methods to avoid detection.
"DO YOU really want justice like in that totalitarian states"... Justice like what? I want donald tRump to be charged and placed on trial. I have never said I don't.
"...open to a public and easy to check for yourself FACTS"... LOL! Qtard demands covert intelligence agencies reveal their secrets to him or he won't believe what they say. Who cares if the revelation of some of this info will get undercover agents killed and guarantee USA has most ineffective intelligence in the world. Qtard says NMP.
"...is all just political campaign of smearing political opponents with feces"... donald tRump and his defenders make that exact claim. donald tRump's OWN SON participated in the "witch hunt" by meeting with Russian agents at tRump tower. Gotta wonder why DTJ threw feces at his father.
\\"most surely, they will NOT do anything like that"... Of course not. The CIA does not reveal sources and methods.
Very... convinient.
Or... am I wrong? Am I??? ;-P
\\"DO YOU really want justice like in that totalitarian states"... Justice like what? I want donald tRump to be charged and placed on trial. I have never said I don't.
No. You are reduced yourself to a shittalker -- trying to smear ME... that *I* want anything else. While I was claiming NOTHING ELSE except that ONLY court can provide Justice. Not some commitee. Not some "people who know facts... but will never show em, to anyone". Not some raging mob. COURTS. And with correct procedure -- which includes REVEALING FACTS. Per se. That way -- you eliminated THIS path for yourself.
YOU wanna lynching OVER DD. Period.
\\LOL! Qtard demands covert intelligence agencies reveal their secrets to him or he won't believe what they say.
Yap. You see something wrong with that? Maybe you want that "covert intelligence agencies" to be like... KGB? Admit it... you want it, dearly. Isn't it?
\\Who cares if the revelation of some of this info will get undercover agents killed and guarantee USA has most ineffective intelligence in the world. Qtard says NMP.
Yap. Problems of USA agencies is not MY problems. Because... I am not citizen of USA. Why should I care, ahh???
Your Captain Obvious. ;-P
\\The J6 report is available online though.
I even don't need to read it... to know that there is NO damning for DD facts.
\\"...is all just political campaign of smearing political opponents with feces"... donald tRump and his defenders make that exact claim.
So what? Why obvious Truth must be different, depending of who's said it??? Is that would be Truth, that way?
"YOU wanna lynching OVER DD. Period"... You lie, period. That is what the J6 insurrectionists wanted to do to Mike Pence. That's what trumpturds who dream of "civil war 2.0" want to do to Democratic politicians.
ALL countries run their intelligence agencies the same. In that they don't reveal sources and methods. Or intelligence that would reveal sources and methods. This has nothing to do with "conviencene". It is because it is the only way they can effectively collect intelligence. But you are obviously too qtarded to understand.
"I even don't need to read it... to know that there is NO damning for DD facts"... Qtard describes his "stick your head in the sand" strategy. When he says that facts aren't facts... he doesn't even know what the facts are! And doesn't want to know.
\\"YOU wanna lynching OVER DD. Period"... You lie, period.
Baseless. ;-P As always.
\\ALL countries run their intelligence agencies the same.
Yes, yes, yes. ALL coutries just have they own version of KGB. (that's why I like idiots... sane people, just freakingly CANNOT be THAT funny with their brain %-)))))))
\\This has nothing to do with "conviencene". It is because it is the only way they can effectively collect intelligence. But you are obviously too qtarded to understand.
Of course, of course.
And that police can place their knee on your neck... that is NOT "convinience"... that is just the only way they can effectively... what exactly? Break your neck?
Obviously, for me as foreigner... it's hard to understand.
\\"I even don't need to read it... to know that there is NO damning for DD facts"... Qtard describes his "stick your head in the sand" strategy.
Not at all. Just common sense. But well, idiots cannot grasp what "common sense" is about.
Even if you'd feed em with that pearls of basic wisdom.
IF... there, in that J6 commitee reports, would be FACTS damning for DD. THEN... it would be, NO it MUST be, by a due process, that facts MUST be presented to a high court to judge DD for a high trison.
Because... THOSE who WOULD not to -- would be a traitors themself.
So... if there is NO trials of DD -- that's because there is NO facts needed for it.
Simple logic.
But even simplest of logics -- incomprehensive to an idiot. ;-P Because they idiots. :-))))
\\he doesn't even know what the facts are! And doesn't want to know.
1) I... DO NOT know facts, because, as you said it yourself -- only SPECIAL people know em, and NOBODY else allowed to know em.
2) I gave you DEFINITION of what word "fact" is, and that: obvious, self-evidant, reference to Reality itself.
Go propose YOUR definition. OR... feel free to criticize MINE.
Qtard: if there is NO trials of DD -- that's because there is NO facts needed for it.
False. To claim that, because there has (so far) been no trial, donald tRump is innocent, is a logical fallacy.
"The Ad ignorantiam fallacy is the logical error occurring when a proposition is unjustifiably claimed to be false simply because it has not been proved true".
Qtard: But even simplest of logics -- incomprehensive to an idiot.
Not "logics", logical fallacy. Incomprehensible to you because YOU are an idiot.
\\Qtard: if there is NO trials of DD -- that's because there is NO facts needed for it.
\\False. To claim that, because there has (so far) been no trial, donald tRump is innocent, is a logical fallacy.
1) reduct ad absurdum... SO??? If million years from now there STILL be NO trial... dRump STILL NOT be innocent.
2) That is EXACTLY *totalitarian* style of "justice" -- everybody are quilty, until they'll "prove" their innocence... prove it with loyalty to The Party, of course.
Thank you, Derpy, for showing YET ONE time that you are pro-totalitarian pro-putin anti-democrat and anti-human-rights a-MAGA-turd. ;-P (and follower of Satan, too)
\\logical fallacy. Incomprehensible to you because YOU are an idiot.
Yeah, yeah... you revealed my idiocy. My claim that dRump is not innocent... because, NOBODY still proved that he is...
Oh... but wait... that is YOUR claim. ;-P :-))))))
It hasn't been proven BY A COURT that donald tRump is guilty or innocent, Qderp. Yet Qderp continues to argue that donald tRump is innocent. By calling all proof of his guilt "garbage" and "political smearing with feces". And insisting that a case against tRUmp hasn't YET been brought to court because it CAN'T be. Which is a logical fallacy.
Special prosecutor Jack Smith (who was only appointed 3 months ago, don't ask me why it took so long) is looking into it. Jack Smith hasn't announced that there were be no charges. Will Qderp cry if donald tRump is charged? And insist that donald tRump will beat the false charges (brought for political reasons)?
FYI, I can determine for myself that donald tRump is most likely guilty. As can many people who AGREE that the available facts strongly point toward his being guilty. Me stating my (fact-based) opinion on the matter does not make me pro-totalitarian, pro-putin, anti-democratic, or anti-human-rights. Or a follower of Satan.
Your claim that it does definitely proves you are "quilty" of being bigly qtarded, however.
Comment faker Rattrapper/Qanon: Ich spĂĽre ein starkes Kribbeln in meiner tiefen Kehle... Oh Junge! Ray Epps ist ein groĂźartiges Exemplar... OH, FREUDE!
Fake comments aren't allowed on this blog, Mystere. Last time I checked, at least.
\\It hasn't been proven BY A COURT that donald tRump is guilty or innocent, Qderp. Yet Qderp continues to argue that donald tRump is innocent.
YET ONE proof that self-proclaimed "judge" is a fake. Who do not know what "Presumption of Innocence" is about.
\\By calling all proof of his guilt "garbage" and "political smearing with feces"
And you can support this accusation with direct citations???
Of course not. :-)))))))))) But it doesn't stop you.
YET ONE proof of fakery.
\\And insisting that a case against tRUmp hasn't YET been brought to court because it CAN'T be. Which is a logical fallacy.
Of course it can't... without facts. There is no such suicidal prosecutor, who would ruin his carear... and for what???
\\Special prosecutor Jack Smith (who was only appointed 3 months ago, don't ask me why it took so long) is looking into it. Jack Smith hasn't announced that there were be no charges.
Three months???!!! and he STILL not gone through that report doc? Is he retard and reading it letter by letter? No. Hardly. That is Derpy who are retard here... and do not able to read such transparent hints. ;-P
\\FYI, I can determine for myself that donald tRump is most likely guilty.
As you are "most likely" an idiot. Surely you would. ;-P
\\As can many people who AGREE that the available facts strongly point toward his being guilty.
Again. WHAT FACTS???
Again. Facts... as in: OPEN and obvious, self-evidant, references to Rreality. ;-P
But... you yourself admitted here -- THAT THERE is NO open facts. ;-P
\\Me stating my (fact-based)
Your imagination... surely are fun-based. As it based on poor condition of your brain. And that is FACT. Open (per your writings here), obvious (do it need more in-depth exlanations) and self-evidant...
\\opinion on the matter does not make me pro-totalitarian
What is totalitarianism? - Encyclopedia Britannica www.britannica.com › ... › totalitarianism Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule
SAME as YOU, Derpy... would like to eliminate all and any opposition to a state, isn't it? Where I'm wrong?
\\pro-putin
Putin would like to see demise of USA... and that would be through demise of Freedom and Democracy in USA...
SAME as YOU, Derpy.
\\anti-democratic, or anti-human-rights.
You are AGAINST Court Justice. And AGAINST Presumption of Innocence too.
\\Or a follower of Satan.
You showed yourself as relentless and unbounded lyar. But isn't second name of Satan is "father of all lies". And his commandement to his followers is "to lie!".
\\All lies previously refuted. Qtard says something, I bring it up later
Naah Derpy. Your broken mind might tell you that. But my mind is not broken -- and I saw it clearly, and was pointing it right away to YOU, each time, that your "citations of my words" was FALSE. Conkockted by you, to help to "prove" your point.
Like that *I* said something like Qtard just keeps screeching "facts aren't facts" and "proof isn't proof"
But there is NO such -- I'll repeat "facts aren't facts" -- WORD to WORD... written BY ME, in any of my comments here.
And YOU CANNOT provide correct. WORD to WORD. Citation. With pointing out WHEN and in WHAT comment I have anything like that.
\\and Qtard claims "I never said that". Get bent, Qtard.
That's easy to prove. Just give a link to a comments page where *I* said it. And search excerpt to Ctrl-F it. ;-P
For example. That same "facts aren't facts" gave TWO results ON THIS page.
First -- from your comment. From February 9, 2023 at 8:32 AM
Second -- MY citation from that comment.
BUT. NONE... where that would be IN MY comment, AS MY words. ;-P
But... you will not. Because you are idiot. And heinous liar.
🔺🔺"Comment faker Rattrapper/Qanon: Ich spüre ein starkes Kribbeln in meiner tiefen Kehle... Oh Junge! Ray Epps ist ein großartiges Exemplar... OH, FREUDE!
Fake comments aren't allowed on this blog, Mystere. Last time I checked, at least."
Dervish hit the German Moonbat Moonshine Hooch again. And he's blaming Mystere for his drunken tantrum, claiming Mystere, Qanon and I (Rattrapper) are the same.🔺🔺
Looks like Dervish soiled his Bernie Sanders gay thong panties at his Paris Tennessee toxic dump site again.
Dervish Sanders February 15, 2023 at 3:19 PM: "Get bent, Qtard." Dervish is making 1 of his queer passes at the other Q. For the record, the time stamp shown is on PST. On EST, it'll be 6:19 PM.
Hey Derpish, be careful of what you say. It's not your blog, it's Joe's blog.
63 comments:
Hunter Biden made no "confession"...
Abbe Lowell, an attorney for Hunter Biden: [we] do not confirm Mac Isaac's or others' versions of a so-called laptop ... [we] address their conduct of seeking, manipulating and disseminating what they allege to be Mr. Biden's personal data, wherever they claim to have gotten it".
Actual confessions...
donald tRump Junior confesses to Russian payoffs: "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. ... We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia".
Putin puppet Jimmy Dore confesses to sexual harassment: "I wrote her [Ana Kasparian] a card saying sorry... that was inappropriate. You don't have to worry about that happening again. I won't comment on your clothes anymore".
Putin puppet Minus confesses that Hunter's "laptop" is Russian disinformation: "...unless you control the sources of photos or are a witness, the news is susceptible to being tampered with and edited" :P
His lawsuit was his confession.
donald tRump Junior confesses to Russian payoffs: "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. ...
Russian tenants paying rent/leases on Trump real estate. The quid and pro quo are perfectly legal and in the open.
Hunter Biden's lawsuit, as per his lawyer (see quote) is not a "confession".
Money laundering is illegal.
According to a Bloomberg investigation into Trump World Tower, which broke ground in 1998, “a third of units sold on floors 76 through 83 by 2004 involved people or limited liability companies connected to Russia and neighboring states”. Reuters, meanwhile, has reported that “at least 63 individuals with Russian passports or addresses have bought at least $98.4 million worth of property in seven Trump-branded luxury towers in southern Florida”.
Sounds like you can prove it was money laundering. So why don't you? LOL!
Sounds like you can prove Hunter Biden is guilty of accepting bribes and cutting in his father. Given his "admission" I assume criminal charges will be handed down soon?
Hunter Biden is a CI = Bigly LOL.
If he's not an FBI CI, Hunter's going to be in big trouble once the Congressional Investigations begin.
LOL! There isn't going to be an "Congressional investigations". The Senate is still under Democratic control and they won't be participating. The only purpose of the coming House witch hunt is to harm Joe Biden's 2024 reelection chances. Hunter Biden is likely worried about further embarrassment and possibly moderate trouble. Certainly not "big trouble".
What we really need to investigate is tRump family corruption. Jared is clearly bigly guilty of it. Is Jared Kushner a CI?
Rudy Giuliani and John Paul Mac Isaac (along with any co-conspirators) would be in big trouble if there was a real Congressional Investigation into their laptop. And by "big trouble" I mean lengthy prison sentences.
The House is going to subpoena Hunter BIGLY! :)
I love paybacks.
LOL! How did the Durham investigation payback work out?
If Hunter is subpoenaed by the House republiturds will he show up? Subpoenas were ignored when the Democrats controlled the House. Even if he does show up, he can just take the 5th in response to every question. republiturds did it. Will AG Garland have Hunter arrested if he ignores a subpoena?
\\The only purpose of the coming House witch hunt is to harm Joe Biden's 2024 reelection chances.
And isn't all that "DD's misdeeds" is just the same?
As there is no perspective in court. And ALL (sane?) Dems know it.
There was silent agreement -- to continue haunting DD with it TILL next elections.
Isn't that as it is... in a nutshel? Ah, Dervy? (see, I even used honorifics here) ;-)
\\What we really need to investigate is tRump family corruption.
And why you don't? ;-P (sneaky question... look above)
Qtard: And isn't all that "DD's misdeeds" is just the same?
To you it is. Because you don't care about facts. You've admitted it. Sane Democrats know that "DD misdeeds" aren't a "witch hunt". Because the evidence exists that says he did what is claimed (collude with Russia, violate emoluments clause and do other things to corruptly profit from the presidency, etc). Qtard says the facts don't count because "someone said something something" and republicans are "Dem-sources".
Qtard: "...investigate is tRump family corruption"... And why you don't?
The turd state covers up dotard donald's corruption.
\\To you it is.
And in fact too.
Becuase I em uninterested bystender. Who can look at it objectively.
Well, no... I am biased. I am fuckingly biased.
I am consciously and subjectively PRO JUSTICE.
Means, that principle Justice MUST prevail is not mere lip sink for me.
BUT DEFINING PRINCIPLE.
\\Because you don't care about facts.
I CARE.
But only about REAL facts.
Ones one can... and might, no -- MUST, present. In Court. Period.
But you are one, who likes you non-facts, you dem-dogmas, you political slurr... and trying to call it "fact-based".
You disgusting, De-Ru-Pi. ;-P
\\Sane Democrats know that "DD misdeeds" aren't a "witch hunt".
Yep. Because they KNOW, that that is a way of Sure Win for them. ;-P
Even if it nothing else but mere smearing opponent in feces. ;-P
\\Because the evidence exists
Yeah... there, somewhere, evidances of anythiung and everything exist... :-))))))))))))
That's for sure.
And you are Boltsman Brain Derpy. ;-P :-)))))))))))))
\\Qtard says the facts don't count because "someone said something something" and republicans are "Dem-sources".
NO.
Because mere quality of that "facts" is such, that you NOT ONLY FREAKINGLY UNABLE to present em IN COURT...
you cannot EVEN start compaiugn in media... with that non-dumning non-facts. ;-P
\\The turd state covers up dotard donald's corruption.
Ho-ho-ho... and now you mirroring MAGA-turds... with their "deep state did it". :-))))))))))))))
You trully and really are nothing but losy and brainless... a-MAGA-turd. :-)))))))))))
Plato had a different name for his "deep state". It was called the "Nocturnal Council".
The USSR had it's own version as well. It was called the Communist Party. In America, it's the UniParty...
The formula of the Party-State, as the defining feature of twentieth-century Communism, thus needs to be complicated: there is always a gap between Party and State, corresponding to the gap between the Ego-Ideal (symbolic Law) and the Superego, for the Party remains the half-hidden obscene shadow which redoubles the State structure. There is here no distance, its organization embodying a fundamental distrust of the State organs and mechanisms, as if they need to be continually kept in check. A true twentieth-century-style Communist never fully accepts the State: there always has to be a vigilant agency outside of State control, with the power to intervene in the State's business.
- Slavoj Zizek, "Living in the End Times"
The main organs of the UniParty in the USA is the Intelligence Community (IC) which were integrated after 9/11/01 under the "Patriot Act".
The Deep State Motto... No Pare la Fiesta!
...for no words can ever compare to true jouissance!
Qtard's claim that he is "consciously and subjectively pro justice" is bullplop. The justice system said dotard donald's lawsuit alleging that HRC (and other Dems) framed him for colluding with Russia was "A litany of threadbare allegations... unsupported by any facts".
Qtard says the (supported by the evidence) collusion allegations are "but mere smearing opponent in feces" BY DEMOCRATS! While the judge said the lawsuit "exhibited a continuing pattern of misuse of the courts [and tRump filed the suit] in order to dishonestly advance a political narrative". The OPPOSITE of what Qtard claims (tRump is smearing the feces).
"Trump had sought $70m in damages". Instead tRump was ordered to "cover the defendants' legal fees and costs [of] $937,989.39" :P
Qtard lied: But only about REAL facts. Ones one ... MUST present. In Court. Period.
Justice prevailed in this case. Real facts were presented IN COURT, yet Qtard rejects the findings of the judge. As per Qtard, tRump bringing the frivolous lawsuit is proof he has "balls". The balls to lie about not colluding and smear Democrats with feces. Which Qtard admires.
What happens if/when Special Counsel Jack Smith charges donald tRump? What about all the convictions in court (for seditious conspiracy) of insurrectionists dotard donald sent to the Capitol to overthrow democracy? We ALL saw it as it was broadcast on TV.
Qtard will probably deny any responsibility falls on dotard donald because "dotard donald only wanted people to march to the Capitol to protest peacefully" or some other bullplop (like Minus does). Even though tRump said people needed to "fight like hell" and Rudy Giuliani said it was going to be "trial by combat".
Qtard might say that republiturds didn't convict him in the Senate after he was impeached and therefore he is innocent. Because cheering dotard donald for (so far) evading justice is Qtard's MO.
I love how dervy makes the immediate mistake of equating "justice" with the "justice system". The "justice system" seldom provides "justice". It does even worse at providing "class action" (aka social) "Justice" (every member of the litigation "class" gets an equal share of compensation, despite being disproportionaly impacted).
Wrong. It was Qtard that equated the two.
Qtard: "I CARE. But only about REAL facts. Ones one can... and might, no -- MUST, present. In Court. Period".
"In court" = justice system.
I never agreed with Qtard that dotard donald is innocent of Russian collusion (given that a court hasn't found him guilty of collusion). Try paying attention.
Me? Pay attention? How about you?
Riddle me this, "Why does FBI HQ need twice the office space of the Pentagon, and more office space than the Kremlin?"
To ensure "justice" or "just-is"?
Trump Administration Revives Support for New FBI Headquarters. President Donald Trump's administration on Monday revived its support for construction of a new FBI headquarters, saying it planned to ask Congress in 2018 for the remaining $2.175 billion needed to help pay for it.
\\I love how dervy makes the immediate mistake of equating "justice" with the "justice system".
And how is this mistake?
In religious mind -- it all THE SAME.
Like Pope is THE SAME as Jesus... and vae victis to those who'd try to oppose it. ;-P
\\I never agreed with Qtard that dotard donald is innocent of Russian collusion (given that a court hasn't found him guilty of collusion). Try paying attention.
So??? People CAN BE assigned to be guilty... even WITHOUT correct and open trial in court?
Am I understanding what you babbling THE RIGHT WAY, ah De-Ru-Pi???
\\The USSR had it's own version as well. It was called the Communist Party.
And when only it'll grow TOO boring to you... to demonstrate your ignorance? :-))) Rethorical question. SARCASM!!!
While it is know to all -- that ws Che-Ka. ;-P Emergency Committe. ;-P
\\There is here no distance, its organization embodying a fundamental distrust of the State organs and mechanisms, as if they need to be continually kept in check. A true twentieth-century-style Communist never fully accepts the State: there always has to be a vigilant agency outside of State control, with the power to intervene in the State's business.
- Slavoj Zizek, "Living in the End Times"
Bull crap. :-)))
Com-party was "missing mediator"... and it really did disappeared, in the end of USSR.
And it gone broke. ;-P
As it was sole glue connecting it.
\\Qtard's claim that he is "consciously and subjectively pro justice" is bullplop.
And you will show it with direct and correct citation, and logical argumentation??? Neee... (Derpy with a Pinnochio nose picture here) :-))))
\\Qtard says the (supported by the evidence) collusion allegations
And??? ____________ Where???________THAT^^^________evidances?
They are NOT present. Neither in court, nor in the media.
ONLY throught someone's "hearsay". And that someone -- are NOT objective ones, but on the contrary -- VERY subjective and involved.
People tend to devise ANY lie... for their own benefit. Even unconsciously. And ESPECIALLY, when there is NO punishment or risk of that lie being revealed.
Period.
\\The OPPOSITE of what Qtard claims (tRump is smearing the feces).
He tryed to use that "feces" in court. MEANS -- he seems like faithfully believed that it was true. Or... believed that that is "plausible" enough.
SEE THE DIFFERENCE???
I'll reveal it to you.
YOU(that somebody-somebody who said that something-something, you trying to fight for so blindly)... neither believe themself that that "something-something" is true. Nor they even believe it "plausible" enough. EVEN for smearing compaign in media.
Means -- it absolutely non-factual bullcrap. EVEN if it have some relation to a Reality (Like Trump really trying to have some support from Putin... or that Putin proposed/gave as a freebie, such support -- which is, how politics works)...
YOU HAVE NO PROOFS!!!
While frantickly trying to play it like you have...
well, the same as ANY and EVERY religious junky out there. ;-P
Wishful/magical/religious thinking. And try to disprove that that is not true. ;-P :-))))
\\Qtard lied: But only about REAL facts. Ones one ... MUST present. In Court. Period.
\\Justice prevailed in this case. Real facts were presente...
Yawn.
That is YOUR open lie and attempt of derailment.
That was NOT the case in question. And you know it. And trying to bend Reality and my claim into a pretcel -- to accomodate to a form your brain ALREADY are. ;-P
\\ The balls to lie about not colluding and smear Democrats with feces. Which Qtard admires.
I just laughing from Dems... who admiring this Trump-power... and wanting it for themself. And screaming as that sissies, when people like I -- truthful and rational -- showing to them that it doesn't work. And will not work.
Because.
dRrump have NO power. He really are that sto-o-o-opid and small minded.
To think that that his lies is really truth. :-)))))))))
But... feel yourself free... to show yourself idiot again, and to pretend/claim that this my words are "proof" of my "admiration of DD". :-)))))))))))))))
\\What happens if/when Special Counsel Jack Smith charges donald tRump?
And WHEN??? :-))) For how long we should wait for that to happen???? :-)))))))))))))))
Till time of elections? ;-)
\\What about all the convictions in court (for seditious conspiracy) of insurrectionists dotard donald sent to the Capitol to overthrow democracy? We ALL saw it as it was broadcast on TV.
And? Do you have PROOFS??? Evidances/witnesses eligable for a court?
Of dRump's involvment into it?
No? Well, that's what I thought. ;-P
\\Qtard might say that republiturds didn't convict him in the Senate after he was impeached and therefore he is innocent. Because cheering dotard donald for (so far) evading justice is Qtard's MO.
Yawn
Bullshit.
That is you are one cheering for somebody-somebody who saying nothing else but proofless babbling...
The bigliest YAWN is Qtard's continual derping.
derp: The constant repeating of an opinion after facts have proved it incorrect, especially as a rhetorical tactic.
Qtard just keeps screeching "facts aren't facts" and "proof isn't proof". Because Qtard is a wishful/magical/religious thinker.
Qtard asks for a court case, I give him one, and Qtard says "that one doesn't count"... because "That was NOT the case in question. And you know it". I don't. Because it was. And YOU know it. Yet you continue with your failed derp strategy.
Qtard: Do you have PROOFS??? Evidances/witnesses eligable for a court? Of dRump's involvment into it? No? Well, that's what I thought.
Qtard thought wrong. The proof of tRump's involvement in the J6 insurrection was broadcast on TV :P donald tRump's involvement was conclusively established by the J6 House bipartisan select committee. They issued a lengthy report and referred donald tRump to the Justice Department for prosecution :P
Qtard = untruthful and irrational derp.
Trump led the break-in of Congress? Who knew? Did he disguise himself as Ray Epps?
\\The bigliest YAWN is Qtard's continual derping.
May it be that you are praising me, Depry? ;-P
\\derp: The constant repeating of an opinion after facts have proved it incorrect, especially as a rhetorical tactic.
Yep.
Exactly what YOU do. Here. Fore the several consequting months... and that's while I'm observing it. But I bet you do that for much longer and around much wider audience, isn't it, Derpy?
\\Qtard just keeps screeching "facts aren't facts" and "proof isn't proof". Because Qtard is a wishful/magical/religious thinker.
You are lame Derpy.
Try to invent own back bites. Your "no, you are fool" is so childish, and disingenious. ;-P
\\Qtard asks for a court case, I give him one, and Qtard says "that one doesn't count"... because "That was NOT the case in question. And you know it". I don't. Because it was. And YOU know it. Yet you continue with your failed derp strategy.
Of course.
Because case (nonexistant) we was discussing -- that is case where dRump would be called to court for HIS own misdeeds.
Case where he is on accusing side, or where he is only witness -- totally irrelevant.
Your Captain Obvious. ;-P
\\Qtard: Do you have PROOFS??? Evidances/witnesses eligable for a court? Of dRump's involvment into it? No? Well, that's what I thought.
\\Qtard thought wrong. The proof of tRump's involvement in the J6 insurrection was broadcast on TV
So? Why you STILL not in court??? With that, such apparent, (non)"proofs".
\\ :P donald tRump's involvement was conclusively established by the J6 House bipartisan select committee. They issued a lengthy report and referred donald tRump to the Justice Department for prosecution :P
YEAH.
And WHAT court TOOK it as argument? ;-P
WHICH prosecutor came to the court with it? ;-P
WHAT was (or would be) results of it? ;-P
\\Qtard = untruthful and irrational derp.
As I said -- try to avoid shiny mirroring object, Derp. To not see derps everywhere.
But... looks like you are inclined to live in that room with mirrors :-)))
.
Joe?
Can you give me a hand, here.
Do my English writing here is really THAT fuzzy and ambigious, and can be understood in such a preposterous ways... as Derpy thrying to pretend?
"Case where he is on accusing side ... totally irrelevant"... Totally relevant. It concerned collusion with Russia. tRump claimed he was "framed" by HRC and others. The judge said he wasn't.
"Why you STILL not in court???"... because the report was JUST released.
"WHICH prosecutor came to the court with it?"... Special Prosecutor Jack Smith is looking at the report.
"WHAT was (or would be) results of it?"... donald tRump's conviction.
"...try to avoid shiny mirroring object, Derp. To not see derps everywhere"... I'm pretty sure I've never seen Qtard's reflection in a shiny mirroring object. No place, let alone everywhere.
\\"Case where he is on accusing side ... totally irrelevant"... Totally relevant. It concerned collusion with Russia. tRump claimed he was "framed" by HRC and others. The judge said he wasn't.
Because.
That is NOT court's job... to discern hearsay. To judge someone for their opinion.
THAT IS ONLY IN TOTALITARIAN STATES, courts can throw into jail for wrongly said word.
Like it is in Russia.
Like it is in China.
And... Derpy seems like UNHAPPY, that that is NOT like it is... in USA.
Yes, De-Ru-Pi???
I don't know wtf "De-Ru-Pi" is. I don't speak Qtardese.
:-)))) Lame bragging. That is your mother tongue... it seems.
Dervy only hears what he wants to hear, Q.
That way he can pretend that whatever you say is something else, and ignore it.
As any religious/magical thinker. ;-P
LOL! Minus and Qtard, like most rightturds, are bigly magical thinkers. Minus hears imaginary "confessions" and has delusions that tell him the Democratic party is racist, even though a super majority of African Americans vote for the Democratic party.
Meanwhile Qtard keeps screeching about how facts aren't facts and proof isn't proof. Then denies he ever said it. Though I could, no doubt, get him to say it again.
Unless he has changed his mind about the IC and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence committee both concluding there was collusion between the dotard campaign and Russia.
The real "collusion" in American government and politics has always been between foreign oligarch's and governments (like China) putting money into the pockets of Senate Intelligence and Foreign Relation Committee members through their "foundations".
btw - Back in the Reconstruction days through Hoover's presidency, when most African Americans were Republicans, the Jim Crow laws in the South and redlining in the North wasn't racist? Who knew? And why'd the majority switch to voting "Democrat" under Roosevelt? He wasn't a racist pr*ck? He did dole pout a lot of "government handouts", that's for sure.
btw - Didn't the African-American so-called "big party switch" happen under Nixon's "Southern Strategy"?
It is a puzzlement...
Nixon ran for President in 1960. The Southern Strategy was devised again in '68 for run number 2. If there was any change in voting pattern, it happened in '64 with Johnson.
It musta had something to do with Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater's flaming racism.
Where Dervy went wrong on race.
\\The real "collusion" in American government and politics has always been between foreign oligarch's and governments (like China) putting money into the pockets of Senate Intelligence and Foreign Relation Committee members through their "foundations".
Hoh... and how happy I am... that that is... NMP. ;-P
\\It musta had something to do with Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater's flaming racism.
Yes.
Certainly.
I need to be happy. :-)))
\\Meanwhile Qtard keeps screeching about how facts aren't facts and proof isn't proof.
And you can prove it with direct and honest citation? No? Why no? Isn't that would be easy-peasy... but, only if ANYTHING of your derpy smearing would be in any corelation with a Truth... :-)))))))))
\\Unless he has changed his mind about the IC and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence committee both concluding there was collusion between the dotard campaign and Russia.
Aha...
but NEITHER they PROVIDED open to a public and easy to check for yourself FACTS
NOR they presented that chain of their inferences IN COURT.
And... most surely, they will NOT do anything like that... up to the time of elections.
And... they'll quickly forget about IT ALL, in the very next day AFTER.
By obvious reason.
I'll say it directly... for foolish Derpy to continue ogling this bone -- BECAUSE, that is all just political campaign of smearing political opponents with feces. Sad, but true.
PS Well, anyway. I would like to see that court. And dRump in chains in result of it. But... I give to it yet smaller and smaller chance... let's say, less then 1%.
So, I will not hold my breath waiting for it. NMP, anyway.
And yeah, Derpy... what is your word? DO YOU really want justice like in that totalitarian states... in USA?
But you WILL NOT answer this direct question. Will try to ignore, or derail, or subvert it.
THE SAME... as Satan would do -- to not meet with even a drop of Holy Water.
:-))))))))))))))))
"most surely, they will NOT do anything like that"... Of course not. The CIA does not reveal sources and methods. That can result in people getting killed. And/or adversaries changing methods to avoid detection.
"DO YOU really want justice like in that totalitarian states"... Justice like what? I want donald tRump to be charged and placed on trial. I have never said I don't.
"...open to a public and easy to check for yourself FACTS"... LOL! Qtard demands covert intelligence agencies reveal their secrets to him or he won't believe what they say. Who cares if the revelation of some of this info will get undercover agents killed and guarantee USA has most ineffective intelligence in the world. Qtard says NMP.
The J6 report is available online though.
"...is all just political campaign of smearing political opponents with feces"... donald tRump and his defenders make that exact claim. donald tRump's OWN SON participated in the "witch hunt" by meeting with Russian agents at tRump tower. Gotta wonder why DTJ threw feces at his father.
\\"most surely, they will NOT do anything like that"... Of course not. The CIA does not reveal sources and methods.
Very... convinient.
Or... am I wrong? Am I??? ;-P
\\"DO YOU really want justice like in that totalitarian states"... Justice like what? I want donald tRump to be charged and placed on trial. I have never said I don't.
No.
You are reduced yourself to a shittalker -- trying to smear ME... that *I* want anything else. While I was claiming NOTHING ELSE except that ONLY court can provide Justice. Not some commitee. Not some "people who know facts... but will never show em, to anyone". Not some raging mob. COURTS. And with correct procedure -- which includes REVEALING FACTS. Per se.
That way -- you eliminated THIS path for yourself.
YOU wanna lynching OVER DD. Period.
\\LOL! Qtard demands covert intelligence agencies reveal their secrets to him or he won't believe what they say.
Yap.
You see something wrong with that?
Maybe you want that "covert intelligence agencies" to be like... KGB?
Admit it... you want it, dearly. Isn't it?
\\Who cares if the revelation of some of this info will get undercover agents killed and guarantee USA has most ineffective intelligence in the world. Qtard says NMP.
Yap.
Problems of USA agencies is not MY problems.
Because... I am not citizen of USA.
Why should I care, ahh???
Your Captain Obvious. ;-P
\\The J6 report is available online though.
I even don't need to read it... to know that there is NO damning for DD facts.
\\"...is all just political campaign of smearing political opponents with feces"... donald tRump and his defenders make that exact claim.
So what?
Why obvious Truth must be different, depending of who's said it???
Is that would be Truth, that way?
"YOU wanna lynching OVER DD. Period"... You lie, period. That is what the J6 insurrectionists wanted to do to Mike Pence. That's what trumpturds who dream of "civil war 2.0" want to do to Democratic politicians.
ALL countries run their intelligence agencies the same. In that they don't reveal sources and methods. Or intelligence that would reveal sources and methods. This has nothing to do with "conviencene". It is because it is the only way they can effectively collect intelligence. But you are obviously too qtarded to understand.
"I even don't need to read it... to know that there is NO damning for DD facts"... Qtard describes his "stick your head in the sand" strategy. When he says that facts aren't facts... he doesn't even know what the facts are! And doesn't want to know.
\\"YOU wanna lynching OVER DD. Period"... You lie, period.
Baseless. ;-P As always.
\\ALL countries run their intelligence agencies the same.
Yes, yes, yes. ALL coutries just have they own version of KGB.
(that's why I like idiots... sane people, just freakingly CANNOT be THAT funny with their brain %-)))))))
\\This has nothing to do with "conviencene". It is because it is the only way they can effectively collect intelligence. But you are obviously too qtarded to understand.
Of course, of course.
And that police can place their knee on your neck... that is NOT "convinience"... that is just the only way they can effectively... what exactly? Break your neck?
Obviously, for me as foreigner... it's hard to understand.
\\"I even don't need to read it... to know that there is NO damning for DD facts"... Qtard describes his "stick your head in the sand" strategy.
Not at all.
Just common sense.
But well, idiots cannot grasp what "common sense" is about.
Even if you'd feed em with that pearls of basic wisdom.
IF... there, in that J6 commitee reports, would be FACTS damning for DD.
THEN... it would be, NO it MUST be, by a due process, that facts MUST be presented to a high court to judge DD for a high trison.
Because... THOSE who WOULD not to -- would be a traitors themself.
So... if there is NO trials of DD -- that's because there is NO facts needed for it.
Simple logic.
But even simplest of logics -- incomprehensive to an idiot. ;-P
Because they idiots. :-))))
\\he doesn't even know what the facts are! And doesn't want to know.
1) I... DO NOT know facts, because, as you said it yourself -- only SPECIAL people know em, and NOBODY else allowed to know em.
2) I gave you DEFINITION of what word "fact" is, and that:
obvious, self-evidant, reference to Reality itself.
Go propose YOUR definition. OR... feel free to criticize MINE.
But you will not.
Because you are i-di-ot. ;-P
Qtard: if there is NO trials of DD -- that's because there is NO facts needed for it.
False. To claim that, because there has (so far) been no trial, donald tRump is innocent, is a logical fallacy.
"The Ad ignorantiam fallacy is the logical error occurring when a proposition is unjustifiably claimed to be false simply because it has not been proved true".
Qtard: But even simplest of logics -- incomprehensive to an idiot.
Not "logics", logical fallacy. Incomprehensible to you because YOU are an idiot.
🔺LIAR LIAR! PANTS ON FIRE!!🔺
🔺🔺LIAR LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!🔺🔺
Ich spĂĽre ein starkes Kribbeln in meiner tiefen Kehle... Oh Junge! Ray Epps ist ein groĂźartiges Exemplar... OH, FREUDE!
Assface Dervish Sanders is a farting jackal, Q. He sniffs Biden's private body cavities for coke residue.
Look in the mirror before you oink and squeal, Assface Dervish Sanders.
\\Qtard: if there is NO trials of DD -- that's because there is NO facts needed for it.
\\False. To claim that, because there has (so far) been no trial, donald tRump is innocent, is a logical fallacy.
1) reduct ad absurdum... SO??? If million years from now there STILL be NO trial... dRump STILL NOT be innocent.
2) That is EXACTLY *totalitarian* style of "justice" -- everybody are quilty, until they'll "prove" their innocence... prove it with loyalty to The Party, of course.
Thank you, Derpy, for showing YET ONE time that you are pro-totalitarian pro-putin anti-democrat and anti-human-rights a-MAGA-turd. ;-P
(and follower of Satan, too)
\\logical fallacy. Incomprehensible to you because YOU are an idiot.
Yeah, yeah... you revealed my idiocy.
My claim that dRump is not innocent... because, NOBODY still proved that he is...
Oh... but wait... that is YOUR claim. ;-P :-))))))
It hasn't been proven BY A COURT that donald tRump is guilty or innocent, Qderp. Yet Qderp continues to argue that donald tRump is innocent. By calling all proof of his guilt "garbage" and "political smearing with feces". And insisting that a case against tRUmp hasn't YET been brought to court because it CAN'T be. Which is a logical fallacy.
Special prosecutor Jack Smith (who was only appointed 3 months ago, don't ask me why it took so long) is looking into it. Jack Smith hasn't announced that there were be no charges. Will Qderp cry if donald tRump is charged? And insist that donald tRump will beat the false charges (brought for political reasons)?
FYI, I can determine for myself that donald tRump is most likely guilty. As can many people who AGREE that the available facts strongly point toward his being guilty. Me stating my (fact-based) opinion on the matter does not make me pro-totalitarian, pro-putin, anti-democratic, or anti-human-rights. Or a follower of Satan.
Your claim that it does definitely proves you are "quilty" of being bigly qtarded, however.
Comment faker Rattrapper/Qanon: Ich spĂĽre ein starkes Kribbeln in meiner tiefen Kehle... Oh Junge! Ray Epps ist ein groĂźartiges Exemplar... OH, FREUDE!
Fake comments aren't allowed on this blog, Mystere. Last time I checked, at least.
\\It hasn't been proven BY A COURT that donald tRump is guilty or innocent, Qderp. Yet Qderp continues to argue that donald tRump is innocent.
YET ONE proof that self-proclaimed "judge" is a fake. Who do not know what "Presumption of Innocence" is about.
\\By calling all proof of his guilt "garbage" and "political smearing with feces"
And you can support this accusation with direct citations???
Of course not. :-))))))))))
But it doesn't stop you.
YET ONE proof of fakery.
\\And insisting that a case against tRUmp hasn't YET been brought to court because it CAN'T be. Which is a logical fallacy.
Of course it can't... without facts.
There is no such suicidal prosecutor, who would ruin his carear... and for what???
\\Special prosecutor Jack Smith (who was only appointed 3 months ago, don't ask me why it took so long) is looking into it. Jack Smith hasn't announced that there were be no charges.
Three months???!!! and he STILL not gone through that report doc? Is he retard and reading it letter by letter?
No. Hardly. That is Derpy who are retard here... and do not able to read such transparent hints. ;-P
\\FYI, I can determine for myself that donald tRump is most likely guilty.
As you are "most likely" an idiot. Surely you would. ;-P
\\As can many people who AGREE that the available facts strongly point toward his being guilty.
Again. WHAT FACTS???
Again. Facts... as in: OPEN and obvious, self-evidant, references to Rreality. ;-P
But... you yourself admitted here -- THAT THERE is NO open facts. ;-P
\\Me stating my (fact-based)
Your imagination... surely are fun-based. As it based on poor condition of your brain. And that is FACT. Open (per your writings here), obvious (do it need more in-depth exlanations) and self-evidant...
\\opinion on the matter does not make me pro-totalitarian
What is totalitarianism? - Encyclopedia Britannica
www.britannica.com › ... › totalitarianism
Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule
SAME as YOU, Derpy... would like to eliminate all and any opposition to a state, isn't it? Where I'm wrong?
\\pro-putin
Putin would like to see demise of USA... and that would be through demise of Freedom and Democracy in USA...
SAME as YOU, Derpy.
\\anti-democratic, or anti-human-rights.
You are AGAINST Court Justice. And AGAINST Presumption of Innocence too.
\\Or a follower of Satan.
You showed yourself as relentless and unbounded lyar.
But isn't second name of Satan is "father of all lies".
And his commandement to his followers is "to lie!".
∆∆ Qtard derping ∆∆
All lies previously refuted. Qtard says something, I bring it up later, and Qtard claims "I never said that". Get bent, Qtard.
\\All lies previously refuted. Qtard says something, I bring it up later
Naah Derpy.
Your broken mind might tell you that.
But my mind is not broken -- and I saw it clearly, and was pointing it right away to YOU, each time, that your "citations of my words" was FALSE. Conkockted by you, to help to "prove" your point.
Like that *I* said something like Qtard just keeps screeching "facts aren't facts" and "proof isn't proof"
But there is NO such -- I'll repeat "facts aren't facts" -- WORD to WORD... written BY ME, in any of my comments here.
And YOU CANNOT provide correct. WORD to WORD. Citation. With pointing out WHEN and in WHAT comment I have anything like that.
\\and Qtard claims "I never said that". Get bent, Qtard.
That's easy to prove. Just give a link to a comments page where *I* said it.
And search excerpt to Ctrl-F it. ;-P
For example. That same "facts aren't facts" gave TWO results ON THIS page.
First -- from your comment. From February 9, 2023 at 8:32 AM
Second -- MY citation from that comment.
BUT. NONE... where that would be IN MY comment, AS MY words. ;-P
But... you will not.
Because you are idiot.
And heinous liar.
🔺🔺"Comment faker Rattrapper/Qanon: Ich spüre ein starkes Kribbeln in meiner tiefen Kehle... Oh Junge! Ray Epps ist ein großartiges Exemplar... OH, FREUDE!
Fake comments aren't allowed on this blog, Mystere. Last time I checked, at least."
Dervish hit the German Moonbat Moonshine Hooch again. And he's blaming Mystere for his drunken tantrum, claiming Mystere, Qanon and I (Rattrapper) are the same.🔺🔺
Looks like Dervish soiled his Bernie Sanders gay thong panties at his Paris Tennessee toxic dump site again.
So?? Where is your analys, Derpy? Where is your *facts*? Which would prove that anything you tryed to say here -- have any root in Reality? ;-P
Dervish Sanders February 15, 2023 at 3:19 PM: "Get bent, Qtard." Dervish is making 1 of his queer passes at the other Q. For the record, the time stamp shown is on PST. On EST, it'll be 6:19 PM.
Hey Derpish, be careful of what you say. It's not your blog, it's Joe's blog.
Post a Comment