LOL! Shortly after buying the platform, Musk tweeted that his policy would be one of "freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach", adding that "negative/hate tweets will be max deboosted" – in other words, deamplified.
...Musk tweeted, "rules were enforced against the right, but not against the left".
Yet a 2021 study suggested the opposite. Looking at millions of tweets in seven countries – Britain, America, Canada, France, Germany, Spain and Japan – researchers found that, with the exception of Germany, Twitter algorithms amplified rightwing politicians more than the left. They also found that in America, conservative news sources were boosted more than liberal ones.
Are they? I doubt it. Yet that didn't stop you from speculating with no evidence. Then reaching a conclusion based on your evidence-free claim. The problem is that you can't accept the truth revealed by the study authors. Due to your aversion to the truth.
I'm not in denial. I agree with the findings of the study that "in America, conservative news sources were boosted more than liberal ones". That Twitter gives conservative news greater visibility than liberal content was true before Elon purchased it. It is even more true now. Elon's "free speech absolutism" = LOL.
\\Are they? I doubt it. Yet that didn't stop you from speculating with no evidence. Then reaching a conclusion based on your evidence-free claim. The problem is that you can't accept the truth revealed by the study authors. Due to your aversion to the truth.
Basics of scientifical thinking. Fer ya, Derpy. With LUV. :-)))
There cannot be "out of the box thinking", unlimited, boundless,,,
There always must be some theory, assumptions, axioms, biases...
So, to keep that in check -- we need to devise hypothesises... and test them.
While ONLY loved (and available) method for a religious/magical thinkers like you, Derpy is "behold MY Truth" and "you are nasty brazen betrotten hertic, who cannot SEE THE TRUTH" :-))))))))))))))
Wow, conservatives got a $100k boost from Russia, and liberals subsequently suppressed tens of millions of conservative voices as a consequence. Now Twitter is acting to restore those suppressed conservative voices, and conservatives are the bad guys? LOL!
In their February NYU study, "False Accusation: The Unfounded Claim that Social Media Companies Censor Conservatives", authors Paul M. Barrett and J. Grant Sims found "there is no evidence to support the claim that the major social media companies are suppressing, censoring or otherwise discriminating against conservatives on their platforms. In fact, it is often conservatives who gain the most in terms of engagement and online attention, thanks to the platforms' systems of algorithmic promotion of content".
Qtard: ..."behold MY Truth" and "you are nasty brazen betrotten hertic, who cannot SEE THE TRUTH"...
If Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are Lefties, why do they allow themselves to be used as tools of the Putin-aligned trumpturd right? And what's he doing on Rumble, given that "the video platform is popular among American right and far-right users"? Does the reason have something to do with his "intellectual honesty"? LOL!
With Democrats everything is about equality and representation. With republiturds everything is about race. The White race. And maintaining the power of the White race.
...cuz it's always about race with Democrats. They only say "equality and representation" in a pretense of race neutrality and to thereby achieve what they believe to be "moral superiority"... which to them (white liberals) is an effective argumentative substitute for their own now differently-called "white supremacy".
Where I work, the biggest push is for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I). They have a huge committee dedicated to it. I have yet to see a single positive result from the committee.
ps - I can hardly wait for their drag queen lecture series to begin.
You should demand an employee drag show. Then you can don a dress, wig and push up bra. Then strut around flaunting your assets while your fellow employees cheer you on. Wouldn't that be a positive result?
\\You should demand an employee drag show. Then you can don a dress, wig and push up bra. Then strut around flaunting your assets while your fellow employees cheer you on. Wouldn't that be a positive result?
Isn't there homophobi and anti-LGBTQ+++++-ism in this words?
55 comments:
LOL! Shortly after buying the platform, Musk tweeted that his policy would be one of "freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach", adding that "negative/hate tweets will be max deboosted" – in other words, deamplified.
...Musk tweeted, "rules were enforced against the right, but not against the left".
Yet a 2021 study suggested the opposite. Looking at millions of tweets in seven countries – Britain, America, Canada, France, Germany, Spain and Japan – researchers found that, with the exception of Germany, Twitter algorithms amplified rightwing politicians more than the left. They also found that in America, conservative news sources were boosted more than liberal ones.
...are these the same "study authors" who claim that Matt Taibi is a right winger?
....if so, I might understand their results.
Are they? I doubt it. Yet that didn't stop you from speculating with no evidence. Then reaching a conclusion based on your evidence-free claim. The problem is that you can't accept the truth revealed by the study authors. Due to your aversion to the truth.
Matt Taibbi is a liar.
Just how deep is the river of DeNile you're standing in, Dervy? I think that you're in over your head and drowning in it.
I'm not in denial. I agree with the findings of the study that "in America, conservative news sources were boosted more than liberal ones". That Twitter gives conservative news greater visibility than liberal content was true before Elon purchased it. It is even more true now. Elon's "free speech absolutism" = LOL.
\\Are they? I doubt it. Yet that didn't stop you from speculating with no evidence. Then reaching a conclusion based on your evidence-free claim. The problem is that you can't accept the truth revealed by the study authors. Due to your aversion to the truth.
Basics of scientifical thinking. Fer ya, Derpy. With LUV. :-)))
There cannot be "out of the box thinking", unlimited, boundless,,,
There always must be some theory, assumptions, axioms, biases...
So, to keep that in check -- we need to devise hypothesises...
and test them.
While ONLY loved (and available) method for a religious/magical thinkers like you, Derpy is "behold MY Truth" and "you are nasty brazen betrotten hertic, who cannot SEE THE TRUTH" :-))))))))))))))
Wow, conservatives got a $100k boost from Russia, and liberals subsequently suppressed tens of millions of conservative voices as a consequence. Now Twitter is acting to restore those suppressed conservative voices, and conservatives are the bad guys? LOL!
Minus: ...liberals subsequently suppressed tens of millions of conservative voices...
They didn't.
In their February NYU study, "False Accusation: The Unfounded Claim that Social Media Companies Censor Conservatives", authors Paul M. Barrett and J. Grant Sims found "there is no evidence to support the claim that the major social media companies are suppressing, censoring or otherwise discriminating against conservatives on their platforms. In fact, it is often conservatives who gain the most in terms of engagement and online attention, thanks to the platforms' systems of algorithmic promotion of content".
Qtard: ..."behold MY Truth" and "you are nasty brazen betrotten hertic, who cannot SEE THE TRUTH"...
LOL!
We HAVE the proof now Dervy, get out of DeNile.
The evidence unequivocally proves that Minus and Qtard are deeply in denial.
Not this week's evidence. :)
If Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are Lefties, why do they allow themselves to be used as tools of the Putin-aligned trumpturd right? And what's he doing on Rumble, given that "the video platform is popular among American right and far-right users"? Does the reason have something to do with his "intellectual honesty"? LOL!
Because truth isn't L->R? These days, it's ONLT ->R. :)
...and Rumble doesn't have to censor, like most "Lefty" sites.
...which is why all the truth is on the ->R.
That is where the "truth" is for magical thinkers like you.
I'm not the magical thinker who needs thought police and censorship to keep my narrative alive. :)
\\\\Qtard: ..."behold MY Truth" and "you are nasty brazen betrotten hertic, who cannot SEE THE TRUTH"...
\\LOL!
So what?
Why you think BOTH of you cannot be magical (th|st)inkers. ;-P
Show your logic. Or more like, absence of any. :-)))
Qtard: Why you think BOTH of you cannot be magical (th|st)inkers.
LOL! Qtard ALONE knows the truth!
THAT's your logic?
No, it's yours.
I'm not the one who said it.
You haven't repeatedly written about me being in "deNile"? I think you did, but if you are now retracting that bs, I will accept your apology.
...further gargled proof...
Of what?
Deep river immersion.
Unlike you, I don't immerse myself in right wing fake news :P
And what waters do you prefer? ;-P
\\\\Qtard: Why you think BOTH of you cannot be magical (th|st)inkers.
\\LOL! Qtard ALONE knows the truth!
Yap. That is obvious. When one keep diligently using of that "magical" tool od inference of Truth. ;-P
Clearly, I'm a wizard in your eyes, isn't it, Derp? :-))))
Logic.
Dervy thinks that logic is Eurocentric and racist.
:-))))))))))
No, it's White and Male, and Suprime. ;-P
Like that beardy ancient greeks
You have to understand. With Democrats, EVERYTHING is race.
With Democrats everything is about equality and representation. With republiturds everything is about race. The White race. And maintaining the power of the White race.
Why you still not won then?
White race is that minority.
And you can combine forces of all-all people with your "equality and representation"...
but that still not happenning. That's strange, isn't it?
...cuz it's always about race with Democrats. They only say "equality and representation" in a pretense of race neutrality and to thereby achieve what they believe to be "moral superiority"... which to them (white liberals) is an effective argumentative substitute for their own now differently-called "white supremacy".
...once a racially obsessed Democrat, ALWAYS a racially obsessed Democrat.
It's always about race with Republicans. The White race and preserving the power of the White race.
You seem to be the one who's always talking about colour, Derv, no me.
I talk about inclusion, representation and equality. You always make it about color while denying it's all about color with you.
Now... that looks like clinical case.
Of severe cognitive impirment.
Where I work, the biggest push is for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I). They have a huge committee dedicated to it. I have yet to see a single positive result from the committee.
ps - I can hardly wait for their drag queen lecture series to begin.
You should demand an employee drag show. Then you can don a dress, wig and push up bra. Then strut around flaunting your assets while your fellow employees cheer you on. Wouldn't that be a positive result?
Sorry, but you need to do your own grooming, Dervy. You can't sub it all out to amateurs.
If you need a drag name, what about "Kitara Ravache"? LOL.
Wasn't that the last amateur you subbed it out to? And he ended up switching party's.
\\You should demand an employee drag show. Then you can don a dress, wig and push up bra. Then strut around flaunting your assets while your fellow employees cheer you on. Wouldn't that be a positive result?
Isn't there homophobi and anti-LGBTQ+++++-ism in this words?
Do we need to call Pride Police here? :-)))
No, that was just Dervy fantasizing about gays again. He does a lot of that.
No.
:-)))
Go commit coming-out, already. ;-P
Or... you are such a quirr, that even modern most developed LGBTQ++++ comunity would say "fu-u-u-u, what a pervert"??? :-)))
Qtard knows I am "quirr" and suggests I "come out". Is that a Qtard "fact"? One Qtard learned due to someone saying something-something, ehh?
Is you behavior is a fact? ;-)
Qtard hates facts.
Yep. Derpy hates facts. I see. :-)))
And why you hate facts?
Did the touched you in "that" place?
Post a Comment