your videos? Why is retired Army colonel Douglas Macgregor rooting for Putin? The collusion couldn't be that much more obvious. America-hating trumpturds (Macgregor, Ritter, Greenwald, Taibbi, Dore, Minus, Qtard) would be filled with glee if Putin exacted revenge on the United States. You'd prefer the deaths of tens of thousands over one (Putin).
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said... "Nobody is rooting for Putin" = �� ��
Yep. That's true. There was TWO people for at least.
1. Obama Russian reset - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Russian_reset The Russian reset was an attempt by the Obama administration to improve relations between the United States and Russia in 2009–2013.
2. Biden Zelensky refuses US offer to evacuate, saying 'I need ammunition ... www.cnn.com › 2022/02/26 › europe › ukraine-zelensky-evacuation-intl Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has turned down an offer from the United States of evacuation from the capital city Kyiv, the Ukraine ...
Above bullplop is what Qtard considers to be "facts". Qtard (with his ridiculous and blatant lies) reveals which side he is on. He is pro-Putin and pro-Ukraine all the way. Why he vigorously defends the Putin-puppet, donald tRump.
Thank you Derpy... for showing so openly and definitely what shit overflows your brain.
\\Above bullplop is what Qtard considers to be "facts".
Yep. Refs to a Dem-aligned news media -- is NOT facts. Because Derpy do not want to remember, do not want to hear how it sounds. Obama that placated Putin's genocide against Georgians
\\Qtard (with his ridiculous and blatant lies) reveals which side he is on.
Yes. "Which you side on" is more important in Derpy's eyes. More important than knowing facts. More important than following Truth. More important than Justice.
And as that...
\\He is pro-Putin and pro-Ukraine all the way.
Such a oxyMORONIC claims easily come to his mind, so then he'd spew em out with bunch of acid from his dusturbed by truth stomatch.
\\Why he vigorously defends the Putin-puppet, donald tRump.
And... Putin's Propagandists "logica conclusion" as a topping... on that cake... made of shit. :-))))))))
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? is a Latin phrase found in the work of the Roman poet Juvenal ... the problem of controlling the actions of persons in positions of power, ...
Qtard: Such a oxyMORONIC claims easily come to his mind, so then he'd spew em out with bunch of acid from his dusturbed by truth stomatch.
Nope. I have no stomach acid issues as a result of Qtard "truth". btw, I made a mistake and corrected it with a follow-up. What you quote is not what I intended to say.
There is a problem with controlling the actions of persons in positions of power you say? I was sure you thought it was easy. Given your criticism of US authorities failure (so far) to hold tRump accountable as "teethless".
\\Nope. I have no stomach acid issues as a result of Qtard "truth". btw, I made a mistake and corrected it with a follow-up. What you quote is not what I intended to say.
And you think it became LESS oxyMORONIC??? :-)))))
Well, I could ask you to give chain of *logical* reasoning of how you cam to that "conclusions".
But let's speak frankly here, can we? After so much beakering. THERE was NONE. And that is "as intended". As you never wanted neither be accountble for your words nor provide some base for em. That was just shallow taunts and bullshit smearing. Isn't it, Dervy?
So... question is ONLY ONE here -- can you, do you have capabilities, to talk with anything else?
I bet on NO. ;-P But you are free to try to amuse me. :-)))
\\There is a problem with controlling the actions of persons in positions of power you say? I was sure you thought it was easy. Given your criticism of US authorities failure (so far) to hold tRump accountable as "teethless".
That's it. But. It seems like you are thinking that buzz... ehm, debating "dotard donald" CAN help you do anything with it, am I right?
I do not believe my "buzzing" about donald tRump will have any effect what-so-ever re him being prosecuted. What "proof" did Qtard provide that I do believe this absurdity? Did he use ESP on me and read my thoughts? Am I convinced that Jack Smith reads this blog and is persuaded by my arguments?
Or, maybe I am really wrong, and Derpy can logically and argumentable demonstrate WHERE and HOW I wrong? Na-a-a-a-ah. :-))))))
\\Blogger Joe Conservative said... Notice that proof for assertions in the Dervy's world are considered "optional". And yes, my pointing out the assertion of Dervy's above is "proof".
Regrettably... your assertion is too naive.
From all what I see. In Derpy's world only "truthes" exist.
What Derpy babbles -- it's Truth. What Derpy cites of other Dem-junkies -- even bogger Truth. What Derpy gives as refs to some Dem-sources -- ultimately and undenyable Truth. And so long and so forth...
"False" or "unknown" or "uncertain" -- do not exist in Derpy's World.
Or... it is undestinguishanble from "Blashchemy!!!! Burn in Hell INFIDEL"
:-))))))))))))))))))))
That's why teasing him is so much fun. ;-P
\\I do not believe my "buzzing" about donald tRump will have any effect what-so-ever re him being prosecuted. What "proof" did Qtard provide that I do believe this absurdity?
In the end of that sentence was this sign --> '?' It called 'question mark'. Sentences with that mark called QUESTIONS.
That only morons like you Derpy, pretend that thay making statements EVEN if they pretend that they asking question.
Ordinary people -- just ask questions, when they ask questions. Because they don't know, uncertain, or want confirmation, or... whatever.
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said... I answered the question. I said NO. The Senate bipartisan intelligence committee isn't a Dem-source. The CIA and FBI aren't Dem-sources.
Quit this pretence -- the very moment you started citing/refering to them -- it became Dem-sources -- 'cayse you cite and refer ONLY THAT sources that are in a groove with your views ONLY. ;-P
That moment
\\The Senate bipartisan intelligence... The CIA and FBI...
would say something you'd not like. Like that that they found TRUE Hunter's laptop. You'd start call em names. ;-P
I've never said I like Liz Cheney. I don't. Though, if I pointed out that she at least has the intellectual integrity to acknowledge the obvious about tRump, she would magically and qtardedly become a "Dem-source".
\\I've never said I like Liz Cheney. I don't. Though, if I pointed out that she at least has the intellectual integrity to acknowledge the obvious about tRump, she would magically and qtardedly become a "Dem-source".
Liz Cheney was the former Representaive for the State of Wyoming. Her father was George W. Bush's Republican Vice President. She was a rabid Never-Trumper and critic of the Trump Administration. This, Dervy calls, "intellectual integrity"... and I call "global corporatist interests"
Minus: This, Dervy calls, "intellectual integrity"... and I call "global corporatist interests".
You lie. I call her truth-telling about tRump intellectual integrity. Not her support of global corporatist interests. Liz Cheney supports global corporatist interests because that is what republicans do.
\\Blogger Joe Conservative said... Liz Cheney was the former Representaive for the State of Wyoming. Her father was George W. Bush's Republican Vice President. She was a rabid Never-Trumper and critic of the Trump Administration. This, Dervy calls, "intellectual integrity"... and I call "global corporatist interests"
Ok. Ok. I will not be asking such questions anymore. :-)
\\Liz Cheney supports global corporatist interests because that is what republicans do.
Qtard: "Liz Cheney supports global corporatist interests because that is what republicans do" ...and Dems too.
False. The official position of the Democratic Party is that American jobs should be protected via the imposition of "a Biden Offshoring Tax Penalty".
Quote: This penalty is specifically aimed at those who offshore manufacturing and service jobs to foreign nations in order to sell goods or provide services back to the American market.
40 comments:
Is the end near for Putin?
Revenge porn fantasies, Dervy?
your videos? Why is retired Army colonel Douglas Macgregor rooting for Putin? The collusion couldn't be that much more obvious. America-hating trumpturds (Macgregor, Ritter, Greenwald, Taibbi, Dore, Minus, Qtard) would be filled with glee if Putin exacted revenge on the United States. You'd prefer the deaths of tens of thousands over one (Putin).
Thank you for demonstrating feebliness of ya mind, Derpy. ;-P
But well, you are faithful dem-junky, and you all the same. :-))))
Nobody is rooting for Putin. We just prefer not listening to fake news.
"Nobody is rooting for Putin" = 🐂 💩
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...
"Nobody is rooting for Putin" = �� ��
Yep.
That's true.
There was TWO people for at least.
1. Obama
Russian reset - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Russian_reset
The Russian reset was an attempt by the Obama administration to improve relations between the United States and Russia in 2009–2013.
2. Biden
Zelensky refuses US offer to evacuate, saying 'I need ammunition ...
www.cnn.com › 2022/02/26 › europe › ukraine-zelensky-evacuation-intl
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has turned down an offer from the United States of evacuation from the capital city Kyiv, the Ukraine ...
Above bullplop is what Qtard considers to be "facts". Qtard (with his ridiculous and blatant lies) reveals which side he is on. He is pro-Putin and pro-Ukraine all the way. Why he vigorously defends the Putin-puppet, donald tRump.
Correction: Qtard is pro-Ukraine genocide.
Thank you Derpy... for showing so openly and definitely what shit overflows your brain.
\\Above bullplop is what Qtard considers to be "facts".
Yep. Refs to a Dem-aligned news media -- is NOT facts.
Because Derpy do not want to remember, do not want to hear how it sounds.
Obama that placated Putin's genocide against Georgians
\\Qtard (with his ridiculous and blatant lies) reveals which side he is on.
Yes. "Which you side on" is more important in Derpy's eyes.
More important than knowing facts.
More important than following Truth.
More important than Justice.
And as that...
\\He is pro-Putin and pro-Ukraine all the way.
Such a oxyMORONIC claims easily come to his mind, so then he'd spew em out with bunch of acid from his dusturbed by truth stomatch.
\\Why he vigorously defends the Putin-puppet, donald tRump.
And... Putin's Propagandists "logica conclusion" as a topping... on that cake... made of shit. :-))))))))
And...
I still waiting for your answer to this question.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? is a Latin phrase found in the work of the Roman poet Juvenal ... the problem of controlling the actions of persons in positions of power, ...
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Is their work "classified"?
Qtard: Such a oxyMORONIC claims easily come to his mind, so then he'd spew em out with bunch of acid from his dusturbed by truth stomatch.
Nope. I have no stomach acid issues as a result of Qtard "truth". btw, I made a mistake and corrected it with a follow-up. What you quote is not what I intended to say.
There is a problem with controlling the actions of persons in positions of power you say? I was sure you thought it was easy. Given your criticism of US authorities failure (so far) to hold tRump accountable as "teethless".
...maybe Trump was an FBI informant/ confidential source.... ;)
\\Is their work "classified"?
Yap. You GOT it. (wide green)
\\Nope. I have no stomach acid issues as a result of Qtard "truth". btw, I made a mistake and corrected it with a follow-up. What you quote is not what I intended to say.
And you think it became LESS oxyMORONIC??? :-)))))
Well, I could ask you to give chain of *logical* reasoning of how you cam to that "conclusions".
But let's speak frankly here, can we? After so much beakering.
THERE was NONE.
And that is "as intended".
As you never wanted neither be accountble for your words nor provide some base for em.
That was just shallow taunts and bullshit smearing. Isn't it, Dervy?
So... question is ONLY ONE here -- can you, do you have capabilities, to talk with anything else?
I bet on NO. ;-P
But you are free to try to amuse me. :-)))
\\There is a problem with controlling the actions of persons in positions of power you say? I was sure you thought it was easy. Given your criticism of US authorities failure (so far) to hold tRump accountable as "teethless".
That's it.
But.
It seems like you are thinking that buzz... ehm, debating "dotard donald" CAN help you do anything with it, am I right?
No. You're wrong. As usual.
Notice that proof for assertions in the Dervy's world are considered "optional". And yes, my pointing out the assertion of Dervy's above is "proof".
I do not believe my "buzzing" about donald tRump will have any effect what-so-ever re him being prosecuted. What "proof" did Qtard provide that I do believe this absurdity? Did he use ESP on me and read my thoughts? Am I convinced that Jack Smith reads this blog and is persuaded by my arguments?
Is that your confession?
Of what? That I'm convinced that Jack Smith reads this blog and is persuaded by my arguments? No. I would be insane if I believed that.
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...
No. You're wrong. As usual.
Derpy parroting Trumo: "Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!"??? :-)))
Or, maybe I am really wrong, and Derpy can logically and argumentable demonstrate WHERE and HOW I wrong?
Na-a-a-a-ah. :-))))))
\\Blogger Joe Conservative said...
Notice that proof for assertions in the Dervy's world are considered "optional". And yes, my pointing out the assertion of Dervy's above is "proof".
Regrettably... your assertion is too naive.
From all what I see.
In Derpy's world only "truthes" exist.
What Derpy babbles -- it's Truth.
What Derpy cites of other Dem-junkies -- even bogger Truth.
What Derpy gives as refs to some Dem-sources -- ultimately and undenyable Truth.
And so long and so forth...
"False" or "unknown" or "uncertain" -- do not exist in Derpy's World.
Or... it is undestinguishanble from "Blashchemy!!!! Burn in Hell INFIDEL"
:-))))))))))))))))))))
That's why teasing him is so much fun. ;-P
\\I do not believe my "buzzing" about donald tRump will have any effect what-so-ever re him being prosecuted. What "proof" did Qtard provide that I do believe this absurdity?
In the end of that sentence was this sign --> '?'
It called 'question mark'.
Sentences with that mark called QUESTIONS.
That only morons like you Derpy, pretend that thay making statements EVEN if they pretend that they asking question.
Ordinary people -- just ask questions, when they ask questions.
Because they don't know, uncertain, or want confirmation, or... whatever.
I answered the question. I said NO. The Senate bipartisan intelligence committee isn't a Dem-source. The CIA and FBI aren't Dem-sources.
Is The Alliance for Securing Democracy your "source"? Cuz they're the MSM's. :P
Meet your protectors from "disinformation".
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...
I answered the question. I said NO. The Senate bipartisan intelligence committee isn't a Dem-source. The CIA and FBI aren't Dem-sources.
Quit this pretence -- the very moment you started citing/refering to them -- it became Dem-sources -- 'cayse you cite and refer ONLY THAT sources that are in a groove with your views ONLY. ;-P
That moment
\\The Senate bipartisan intelligence... The CIA and FBI...
would say something you'd not like.
Like that that they found TRUE Hunter's laptop.
You'd start call em names. ;-P
Qtard: ...the very moment you started citing/refering to them -- it became Dem-sources.
∆ Qtard stupidity ∆
They did not find TRUE Hunter's laptop. They did not claim they did. "True Hunter's laptop" does not exist.
Do you know what "hypothetic claim" is???
Or that is just impossible for your mentally degradant brain. :-))))
That was "what if" scenario. ;-P
He likes Liz Cheney, too. AT least... as long as she's accusing Trump of something.
Liz Cheney's dad is still "the devil" though.
I've never said I like Liz Cheney. I don't. Though, if I pointed out that she at least has the intellectual integrity to acknowledge the obvious about tRump, she would magically and qtardedly become a "Dem-source".
Liz Cheney has about as much "intellectual integrity" as a pedophile priest.
\\I've never said I like Liz Cheney. I don't. Though, if I pointed out that she at least has the intellectual integrity to acknowledge the obvious about tRump, she would magically and qtardedly become a "Dem-source".
Hose zat Luz Chainey??? :-)))
Liz Cheney was the former Representaive for the State of Wyoming. Her father was George W. Bush's Republican Vice President. She was a rabid Never-Trumper and critic of the Trump Administration. This, Dervy calls, "intellectual integrity"... and I call "global corporatist interests"
...and yes, your exactly right... Dem magic.
Minus: This, Dervy calls, "intellectual integrity"... and I call "global corporatist interests".
You lie. I call her truth-telling about tRump intellectual integrity. Not her support of global corporatist interests. Liz Cheney supports global corporatist interests because that is what republicans do.
lol! Think you could sell THAT to Paul Pelosi Sr & Jr?
\\Blogger Joe Conservative said...
Liz Cheney was the former Representaive for the State of Wyoming. Her father was George W. Bush's Republican Vice President. She was a rabid Never-Trumper and critic of the Trump Administration. This, Dervy calls, "intellectual integrity"... and I call "global corporatist interests"
Ok. Ok. I will not be asking such questions anymore. :-)
\\Liz Cheney supports global corporatist interests because that is what republicans do.
...and Dems too. ;-P
Sorry, I read it wrong the first time... and corrected my mistake in the 2nd comment. :(
Qtard: "Liz Cheney supports global corporatist interests because that is what republicans do" ...and Dems too.
False. The official position of the Democratic Party is that American jobs should be protected via the imposition of "a Biden Offshoring Tax Penalty".
Quote: This penalty is specifically aimed at those who offshore manufacturing and service jobs to foreign nations in order to sell goods or provide services back to the American market.
Yap. Helping one global corporatists to fight with another global corporatists. ;-P
Nope. See my prior comment.
Post a Comment