Friday, March 4, 2022

The Globalist Neo-Liberal/-Con UniParty Post WWII War Against Independent Media and Classical Liberalism Continues...

38 comments:

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

The handle of the bullwhip reeks of Robert Mapplethorpe's butthole.

Thersites said...

You weren't supposed to drink the 'Piss Christ" punch, beamish...

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Just because I don't have the genocidal hatred of all things American required to have considered voting for Trump longer than a third of a second doesn't mean you should hate me.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

So the left is eating itself. Bon appetit.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Next on Father Charles Coughlin's Social Justice podcast....

Thersites said...

Next time try the blue pill, Neo.

Thersites said...

All you globalists will then realize that you Lefty-Righties were in the same matrix all the time.

Thersites said...

The "Neo" -lib/-con matrix

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Let me know when the right isn't left anymore. I'll bring the chainsaw when you want to cut Medicare.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

'Til then, keep the channels open

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

I'm willing to give you Medicare back the minute you refund me the 43 years of wages paid in with interest.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...and while your at it, I'll take the Social Security lump sum too. I figure $2 million ought to about cover my payments and interest.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Knock on FDR's and LBJ's tomb for that. I can send you a note that says "sucker" on nice stationery though.

Joe Conservative said...

...or you can keep paying in 'til the Ponzi scheme collapses on top of you the day you are set to retire. :)

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

We need to annex more countries and make them pay for it

Joe Conservative said...

...or just force China to buy our Afghani opium...

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Thailand opium is better and you don't get the buzzkill Taliban open mike poetry though

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

RT isn't "independent media".

Wikipedia: RT has regularly been described as a major propaganda outlet for the Russian government and its foreign policy. Academics, fact-checkers, and news reporters (including some current and former RT reporters) have identified RT as a purveyor of disinformation and conspiracy theories. UK media regulator Ofcom has repeatedly found RT to have breached its rules on impartiality, including multiple instances in which RT broadcast "materially misleading" content.

Joe Conservative said...

CNN never broadcast any materially misleading content? Who Knew?

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

I doubt it. Though maybe you can cite an example. But CNN isn't state controlled or a propaganda outlet for the US government.

CNN scores highest of all TV news sources in terms of being high quality (82%), accurate (78%), trustworthy (78%), and impartial (71%). :)

Joe Conservative said...

LOL!

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

18% low quality, 22% inaccurate, 22% untrustworthy, and 29% biased

Dove chocolate is awesome but their soap tastes like shit.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

18% low quality, 22% inaccurate, 22% untrustworthy, and 29% biased

Dove chocolate is awesome but their soap tastes like shit.

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

LOL! He filed a nuisance lawsuit and got paid to go away. If there was any merit to his lawsuit he wouldn't have settled. His lawyers probably took most of whatever pittance CNN offered him to f*ck off.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

So he got $75,000 for a few hours of paperwork?

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

..or $225 million. CNN isn't saying.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

In total, Nick Sandmann’s settlements from The Washington Post, CNN, and NBCUniversal could amount to $775 million but this amount could also be $100 million. As he is a student, the amounts of his settlements are sealed.

What a nuisance!

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

CNN did not pay him $225 million. They paid less than what it would cost them to go to trial. And Sandmann's lawyers (knowing they'd likely lose and get nothing) told him to accept.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

There you go again, reading minds... yet assuming that Sandmann didn't have a legit. case.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...let's see... a legit case that goes to trial gets about 1/4 of the "ask"...
settled would be around 1/8... putting the $100m in the example speculation above into "better perspective".

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

I'm sure CNN's bean counters sent out a memo asking news writers to not defame nuisances further.

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

There you go again, reading minds... yet assuming that Sandmann didn't have a legit. case.

What is your proof that his lawyers thought they'd win? You don't have any. Your link concerns a case that went to trial. This one didn't.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

CNN wanted to settle out of court? Why?

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Because it was cheaper than paying their lawyers to take the case to trial.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Their lawyers would have lost them $775 million?

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

No. You have to pay lawyers to take a case to trial. You settle if it costs less to do so than what the lawyer's fees would be.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

The lawyers would cost $775 million to win a case that allegedly had no merit? Why doesn't everyone sue CNN then? It's free money, right?

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

I assume your stupidity on this subject is intentional. Apparently you believe it's funny. Or maybe you are that stupid. fyi, Sandmann was suing CNN for 225 million. 775 million was the total of all the frivolous lawsuits Sandmann's lawyers filed.

If you think you can get free money by suing CNN, go ahead and file. I doubt you will be able to find a lawyer who will represent you though.