What do all these news accounts have in common?
“Florida Sets Yet Another Coronavirus Record: 173 Deaths In A Day”
“A record 173 Floridians died from the virus Thursday, an average of more than one every eight minutes.”
“The 134 new confirmed deaths is the second-largest increase on record, coming five days after the largest one-day jump of 156 last week.”
“COVID-19 has ravaged Florida, with more than 237,000 people testing positive and 2,013 dying from the virus in July alone.”
So what characteristic do all of the reports share? They are all false.
It is not true that 173 people died from COVID-19 “in a day” in Florida. Nor did 134, or 156 on previous days.
It is also untrue than 2,013 had died in July when that story was published.
All of these scary headlines are based on the number of deaths reported by the state on any given day. This is not the same as the number of deaths that occurred on those days.
The difference might seem trivial. But it’s crucial because the press is using the timing of Florida’s death reports to whip up a frenzy about COVID-19 running riot in the state.
Take a look at the chart below. The blue bars are the number of deaths reported in four days last week. Notice the sharp uphill climb? That’s the story the press has been telling.
But those deaths didn’t occur on those days. In fact, the vast majority of them occurred days, or even weeks, before. The actual date of these deaths is indicated by the orange bars.
In fact, as of Sunday, the biggest one-day death toll so far in the state occurred back on July 16, when 114 are known to have died. And when the press was claiming that 2,013 had died in July, the actual number of known deaths was 1,847.
As we noted in this space last week, this distortion is being repeated by the media in state after state that has seen a recent spike in coronavirus cases. While deaths attributed to coronavirus have increased, the “surge” is a fiction because many of those deaths happened earlier.
But almost no news outlet explains this difference clearly to readers. The Miami Herald is one exception.
In a recent story, it noted — after shouting about hitting a new record for daily deaths — that “the 173 deaths …. does not necessarily mean that every person died in the past 24 hours. In Florida, the deaths announced on a given day could be from several days earlier because the state information does not include the exact date of death.”
But even the Herald didn’t have to leave readers guessing as to how many of those 173 died in the previous 24 hours. Florida’s COVID-19 tracking site had it right on the main page. Of the 173 reported, the number of people who actually died that day was … 19.
This is only one of the problems with the death counts being shouted from the media rooftops.
Here again, Florida serves as a model of how to sow fear.
First there’s the missing context.
While 173 deaths reported in a single day sounds like a lot, it pales in comparison to the peak reached in New York and New Jersey earlier this spring.
New York’s reported deaths topped 1,000 on more than one day in April. That’s in a state with 9% fewer people than Florida.
New Jersey’s peak was 523 on April 20. That’s three times the current “record” set in Florida — in a state that has 59% fewer residents.
Another way to look at it is that the death rate in Florida at the moment is 273 per million residents. In New York, it’s 1,680 and in New Jersey it’s 1,785.
In other words, the current situation in Florida is nothing at all like what happened in the northeast in the spring. Yet that critical information never gets conveyed by the press.
Another bit of missing context is where these deaths are occurring.
That’s not to say these deaths are less important. But it does provide a needed backdrop for everyone else in the state. Their risk is tiny by comparison.
This finding also shows that what’s needed most is to protect at-risk populations, something that the generalized lockdowns failed to do. Pretending that coronavirus “doesn’t discriminate” is a dangerous fiction.
Then there’s the fact that Florida’s death count is almost certainly inflated because the state is counting people who died with the virus, not just those who died because of it.
A report by CBS-12 in West Palm Beach, for example, found that the state has counted as coronavirus deaths:A 60-year-old man who died from a gunshot wound to the head.Out of 581 deaths attributed to coronavirus, “The I-Team found eight cases in which a person was counted as a COVID death, but did not have COVID listed as a contributing cause of death.”
A 90-year-old man who fell and died from complications of a hip fracture.
A 77-year-old woman who died of Parkinson’s disease.
What’s more, only 169 deaths were listed as due to coronavirus without any other contributing factors.
(As a side note, why is a local TV news team digging into the numbers, while the national media is content to repeat whatever the government tells them?)
As we’ve said before, this sort of overcounting is going on nationwide, largely because the CDC has told states to report deaths this way.
The question that deserves to be answered is why the mainstream press seems so willing and eager to whip up fear, rather than provide all the relevant facts, in context, so the public can make its own informed decisions about how to respond to this disease.
Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Monday, July 27, 2020
On Florida's SURGING Death Toll...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
30 comments:
"The question that deserves to be answered is why the mainstream press seems so willing and eager to whip up fear..."
AKA we're lying. Because there is absolutely NO REASON for the media to do such a thing. If they are, why isn't the White House pushing back? Why did Dotard recently say the coronavirus pandemic is going to get worse before it gets better? Is Dotard in on the conspiracy? Are his advisors in on the conspiracy and duping him?
The REAL question that deserves to be answered is why the conservative press seems so willing and eager to whip up paranoia.
I kept asking, "Where are all the deaths?" Now we know. You have been lying the whole time to create a panic...one based upon data long passed and currently irrelevant.
I said before that you were going to claim that the coming increase was fake. Now that it's here? Surprise - you claim it's fake. Yet another conspiracy to feed your persecutory delusions. I saw Mary Trump on Stephen Colbert's show recently. He asked her is she thought her uncle could be helped. She said no. Because he would never admit he has a problem. Also, he is surrounded by enablers. This must be the case with your wife (and other people in your life). Hopefully someone is secretly planning an intervention and you will soon get the help you obviously need. But I doubt it.
Claim? Its now been proven.
Predisent Dotard: "It will probably, unfortunately, get worse before it get's better. Something I don't like saying, but that's the way it is".
Apparently you are unable to hear the words coming out of your leader's mouth when they don't fit the narrative you want to believe.
What do you hear if you watch this video? White noise? Can you even click the link, or does your cognitive dissonance prevent you from doing so?
Herman Cain contracted covid after attending the Dotard rally in Tulsa and has now died. Although maybe his death was faked and he is really still alive? On the other hand, he had cancer in 2006 and subsequently went into remission. So you might say his death wasn't due to covid, but due to the cancer he had 13 years ago. Or "natural causes", given he was 74 years old.
...unlike Democrats, who but for Covid, would be "immortals".
Herman Cain was 74. Dotard is 74. Time for him to die too? Dead people aren't prosecuted for crimes. Other than for that reason I can't say I'd be sad.
I guess your cognitive dissonance did prevent you from looking at that video. The one in which Dotard says the pandemic is going to get worse before it gets better. As opposed to him agreeing with you and declaring the pandemic is over.
Old people die, news at eleven...
Covid has only been around a few months. ZERO old people died from it prior to this year.
And so yes, the "excess deaths" occurring AFTER the influenza period can be attributed to Covid...
...thereby reducing future averages.
Based on race, life expectancies in 2014 were as follows:
Native Americans: 75.06 years
African Americans: 75.54 years
White Americans: 79.12 years
Hispanic Americans: 82.89 years
Asian Americans: 86.67 years
Covid took 1.5 years off Hermann Cain's expected life... if you include black women...
...and nothing if you don't. (2010 Life expectancy for Black males was 71.8 years, and Black females 78.0)
Nobody lives longer than their life expediency? Who knew? So, according to you, I should know (barring accident) the exact day I will die on? Given the life expectancy of a White male is 75.3 years, Dotard doesn't have long left. He won't even make it though a second term. And what about Joe Biden? He's 77 and therefore should already be dead. Do you think he's a zombie?
He'll be a zombie president, if elected.
Better a zombie than a Putin puppet. But we're going to take back the Senate and hold on to the House as well. Then get rid of the filibuster, as recommended by President Obama. There are some significant changes coming. And all to make things better, instead of worse (as under Dotard).
Even if all Biden does is undo Dotard's executive orders (and issue some of his own), roll back White Supremacy (simply by not being Dotard), and competently bring the pandemic to an end -- many will consider the Biden presidency a success.
Biden can only save his political reputation by losing. He admits that he's merely a "placeholder" president because in 2020, no one in the Democrat Party was even marginally qualified to vye with Trump for the posting.
Biden is the "Kick the Can Down the Road Again" option that is the Democrats "go-to" option in just about EVERY political instance when they don't control all three branches of government.
Biden has never admitted he will be a "placeholder" president. Dotard isn't qualified to be president. As PROVEN by his destruction of the US economy. That's in addition to all the other ways he has damaged the US, the presidency and our reputation in the world. It's going to take a LOT longer than 4 or even 8 years to undo the disastrous Dotard presidency.
"Kick the can down the road"? You imply that Dotard has actually fixed any problem? As opposed to making ALL our problems infinitely worse?
He'll run again in 2024 if he wins? LOL! Placeholder Joe....
There has been speculation that Joe Biden may only serve one term, but he hasn't (and won't) confirm that. So it's only speculation. Unless you read his mind. And, even if you did, who is to say he won't change his mind? What difference does it make in any case? He can still have a consequential presidency even if he decides not to run for a second term. "Placeholder" implies he intends to do nothing. NOBODY runs for president intending to do nothing.
won't. If he doesn't say it, it won't happen. Biden's head is your new cloak of Gyges.
Acta non verba!
What the f*ck difference does it make? It doesn't make him a "placeholder".
Biden doesn't even know what country he's in. Of course he's a placeholder.
lol (starting @ 1:30-2:45)!
Dotard is the one who took a cognitive test. And brags that he was able to identify an elephant. LOL!
Joe Biden missed the donkey question.
Biden didn't take the test. There is no suspicion that he might have dementia. Which must be why Dotard took the test.
Joe couldn't remember whether he took the test or not...
At the very end of the question-and-answer session, asked by a reporter if he had been tested for "cognitive decline," he answered, "I've been tested.
Post a Comment