Sunday, January 12, 2025

Who Should You Believe... Your Own Eyes, or the Media Victim Narrative?

What is white guilt-pride? It's believing in things that are both "not true and can't be denied".

from Wikipedia:
Wilfred Reilly is an American political scientist. He is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Kentucky State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from Southern Illinois University and a J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law.[2] Reilly's research focuses on empirical testing of political claims.

19 comments:

  1. I'm not watching this. 14 seconds is enough. Neither the Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin stories were lies. Both of those people were murdered by racists. Clearly Wilfred Reilly is a member of "Blacks for White Supremacy". I believe what I saw with my own eyes and heard with my own ears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, you shoulda watched more... he got to those cases.

      I believe what I saw with my own eyes and heard with my own ears.

      You were physically present and witnessed BOTH "murders". You didn't get your information about the cases from hyper-media/ fake news?

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. ^^🐔🐓🐔🐓🐔🐓🐔🐓🐔🐓🐔🐓🐔🐓🐔🐓💨💨💨💨^^

      Delete
  3. I think you got your information about the cases from the rightturd hyper-media/fake news.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did. Which makes it as good, if not better, than your information. They don't have a guilt-pride driven agenda and narrative to adhere to.

      Delete
  4. That makes your information much worse. Given that it's lie-centric. And I know all about those cases. They were not fake hate crimes, they were genuine hate crimes. I don't need to watch any "alternative facts" video that tells me everything I know is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So why were the defendents in all those cases found "not guilty"? More racists? LOL!

      Delete
    2. I think that the Court verdicts make it abundantly clear who the "liars" were...

      Delete
  5. So... Truth is worse than lies, eh Dervish? Boy, you sure are a bumbling fool!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mystere: Truth is worse than lies...

    Yes, to you truth is worse than lies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Minus: I think that the Court verdicts make it abundantly clear who the "liars" were...

    You are correct. The court verdicts do. "According to a report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the conviction rate for federal hate crime prosecutions increased from 83% during 2005-09 to 94% during 2015-19". link

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 100% of hate crime fakers were found guilty. Jussie Smolette, we barely knew ye!

      Delete
  8. Minus: 100% of hate crime fakers were found guilty.

    Jussie is a Turd. His fake hate crime allows people like you an example to give when you lie about hate crimes ALL being fake. When the FACTS show a 94 percent conviction rate of people charged with hate crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 100 percent of less 6 percent. Depending on why the hate crime charges don't stick for that 6 percent.

    ReplyDelete