Minus: Political prisoners...the DNCs greatest achievement after the KKK, the Civil War, and antifa.
Getting people to believe those lies is a republican achievement. The DNC didn't have anything to do with any of those things.
Minus: Leader of J6 Insurrection get's probation. Musta been one hell of an "insurrection" to merit probation.
You're predicting that the leader of the insurrection, donald tRump, will only receive probation? That would be a great miscarriage of justice. donald tRump should receive more time than Enrique Tarrio.
Qtard: Must be some, still sane, alter-ego of it intervened and typed it.
The democracy hater believes the statement "insurrection is patriotic" is sane. No surprise there. The democracy hater also thinks it is a "human right" to overthrow democracy.
According to Putin, "these people came with political requests". The democracy hater Qtard agrees very strongly with it's idol. It would very much like to see Putin's puppet dotard donald be "president for life".
The president you allege is a puppet is behaving very unpuppet-like...
"...as Chinese growth flatlines, there is growing recognition in Beijing of just how many economic punches current U.S. President Joe Biden is landing on Beijing. Hits that, over time, are causing real economic pain.
Trump's blunderbuss administration swung wildly in all directions as it sought to make life difficult for China's economy and rarely made meaningful contact. Xi's economic policy team nimbly pivoted to limit fallout, while U.S. allies seethed in anger as they suffered collateral damage.
Biden's China policy mix, by contrast, has undermined the world's second-biggest economy with surgical precision. His team has gone after soft targets, including limiting access to key technologies needed to propel China Inc. upmarket and making life difficult for Chinese companies listed on U.S. exchanges.
Evidence any these were received? Or is presumption of innocence something only donald tRump should have?
The US will only transform into Nazi Germany if people have an opinion about donald tRump's guilt or innocence. People having an opinion about Joe Biden being guilty won't make us like Nazi Germany. Can Qtard explain WHY this would be the case?
Qtard: And WHO said it?
Who agreed with it? Said it was "sane"? That wasn't me.
Why would I say insurrection was patriotic and then say the "patriots" are traitors?
Maybe I meant "isn't" and Qtard should have been able to figure out (from context) writing "is" was an error?
Naaah... It is way to dumb to be able to deduce anything from context.
But maybe I wrote "insurrection is patriotic" as a trap... And Qtard took the bait. It agreed that "insurrection is patriotic" is a sane statement. Proving it is insane.
Minus: BA-Zing!
So Minus thinks I do believe in "insurrection is patriotic"? So, Minus thinks we are in agreement on that?
Ok. So then you agree there was a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the government. Given that people were charged and convinced of seditious conspiracy.
The proof that there was no insurrection lies in the fact that no actual legal attempts were ever made to hit it over the fence. Where are the legal charges?
In 24h before election... as final counter-measure to not allow him to win? ;-P
\\Evidence any these were received? Or is presumption of innocence something only donald tRump should have?
Is dRump acting POTUS??? And not just one with ex-president honorary title only?
But... imbecile DUNNO, that Presumption of Innocence NOT APPLICABLE to person in power.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
...Insurrection is patriotic...
January 10, 2024 at 1:39 PM
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
Who agreed with it? Said it was "sane"? That wasn't me.
January 12, 2024 at 7:58 AM
So? What logical conclusion of that TWO facts could be?
That either that "Dervish Sanders" is a liar.
Or... as less possible, but still passable alternative -- it have split personality disorder -- and keep forgetting what it said before.
What else?
\\Maybe I meant "isn't" and Qtard should have been able to figure out (from context) writing "is" was an error?
Hah??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
I'd say... "slip of the tongue". Self-revealing one. ;-P
\\Naaah... It is way to dumb to be able to deduce anything from context.
I'm not psychiatrist. ;-P
To deduce from babbling of a crazy imbecile. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\But maybe I wrote "insurrection is patriotic" as a trap... And Qtard took the bait. It agreed that "insurrection is patriotic" is a sane statement. Proving it is insane.
Yep.
If you'd BE ABLE to EXPLAIN -- how it is "a trap". And how it "Proving it is insane."
Qtard: Must be some, still sane, alter-ego of it intervened and typed it.
Qtard: Brain of a crazy imbecile DO PRODUCE all kinds of crazy delusions.
What is the delusion? That Minus FJ would believe (like you do) that "insurrection is patriotic"?
So it's only you that believes overthrowing just installed in a democratic election is somehow patriotic? Gotcha.
That definitely is a delusion from the brain of a crazy imbecile. Your crazy imbecilic brain. Thank you for admitting it. Finally. The next step is for you to get the help you desperately need.
\\Asking yourself? I think the answer is very clearly NO.
Of course not. ;-P
I was asking imbecile -- you. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Which is obvious from context... but imbecile cannot help it to show flying colors of it -- own imbecility. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
Even when it tryes to say that this or that is much smarter opponent fault... and fails.
Spectacularly.
With falling on its imbecilic face. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But.
Immediately standing up. And even without cleaning mud and feces from its dumb face screaming "NO! Thart is YOU are one who fell! That is YOUR face are in feces!... I know it, because I feel it... in my mouth" :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0000
Minus: No balls made it over THAT fence. The one labelled "insurrection".
None at all? What about the fact that dotard donald's name is being kept off the ballot (under the 14th amendment) in Colorado and Maine due to the fact that he lead an insurrection against the newly elected government?
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment: "No person shall ... hold any office, civil or military, under the United States ... who, having previously taken an oath ... as an officer of the United States ... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof".
btw, if Jan 6 wasn't an insurrection (according to you) how can it be a "fedsurrection" aka an FBI incited insurrection? Isn't you calling it a "fedsurrection" an ADMISSION that it was an insurrection?
btw, do you think Ray Epps called donald tRump before his speech and told him he needed to send his supporters to the Capitol? Did Ray Epps also incite tRump to wait 187 before telling the mob to leave?
Qtard: That either that "Dervish Sanders" is a liar. Or... as less possible, but still passable alternative -- it have split personality disorder -- and keep forgetting what it said before. What else?
Factual quotes imbecile trying to call lies? :-)))))))))))))))))))))
\\None at all? What about the fact that dotard donald's name is being kept off the ballot (under the 14th amendment) in Colorado and Maine due to the fact that he lead an insurrection against the newly elected government?
Yep.
DEMN-rats growing in their totalitarian affinity.
Like it is in Russia and China, and all over the World, today -- eradication of opposition through unlawful use of legal means.
\\What else?
\\Mistype.
But-but-but... Most Brightest and Never-Erring Grammar Boy Derpish Sadners -- CANNOT mystype. ;-P
That's UNTRUE. And UNBELIEVABLE!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))
Quotes: Factual quotes imbecile trying to call lies?
When did you post a "factual quote" without lying about it -- saying "what Derpy really mean"? When did you then "try" to call it a lie? Do you mean "admit"? I don't remember you ever admitting ANY of your many lies.
Qtard: DEMN-rats growing in their totalitarian affinity.
Qtard: Democrats growing in their affinity for the US Constitution and democracy.
Qtard: Like it is in Russia and China, and all over the World, today -- eradication of opposition through unlawful use of legal means.
donald tRump tried to hold on to power using illegal means. But the democracy-hating imbecile has defended overthrowing democracy many times.
While accusing Democrats of having a "totalitarian affinity". Even though it is donald tRump who is vowing to be a dictator and threatening retribution.
Well, that's what democracy hating NewSpeakers like you do.
I have. Many times previously. But you will pretend I did not. In fact, I JUST did explain how. Your moronity makes it impossible for you to understand.
Qtard: That's IMPOSSIBLE to make Factual Quote of something -- that NOT happened. That, that IS NOT a FACT.
Imbecilic lie. Of course it is possible. You do it all the time.
Qtard: But, you are proud imbecile -- and will never admit that obvious Truth.
Of course not. Because it is an obvious lie. Just because you quoted me, anything you say about my quote has to be true? Because you quoted me? That is pure moronity.
Qtard: Your inner Qtard talking??? ;-P --->> //Qtard... Or... that is "mistyping"??? AGAIN???!!!
Already corrected. But you pretended not to see the correction. Yawn. As if every one of your comments is always completely free of errors.
\\ I have. Many times previously. But you will pretend I did not. In fact, I JUST did explain how. Your moronity makes it impossible for you to understand.
Ah... that.
SO-O-O not interesting.
Facts is not facts just because some cretin saying so... what a primitive imbecilic lie. :-((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Can you try to produce some more flashy BS??? Aaaah? Pretty please. ;-p
Naaaah.
\\Qtard: That's IMPOSSIBLE to make Factual Quote of something -- that NOT happened. That, that IS NOT a FACT.
\\Imbecilic lie. Of course it is possible. You do it all the time.
It's just not possible for such imbecile.
IT can only doubling down on its imbecilic lies.
Well.
Yeah.
Yawn.
Continue-continue. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Of course not. Because it is an obvious lie. Just because you quoted me, anything you say about my quote has to be true? Because you quoted me? That is pure moronity.
There is thing. Called LOGIC. ;-)
Ah, well, you called it "blakk magic" -- because you as I-M-B-E-C-I-L-E... just CANNOT grok what it is and how it works. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Already corrected. But you pretended not to see the correction. Yawn. As if every one of your comments is always completely free of errors.
I'll believe you... but, ONLY...
when you'd admit that babbling "I believe in facts" was first and foremost, and most gravest error... ;-P
But you will not.
Cause you are imbecile.
And will only continue doubling down on own imbecility. :-))))))))))))))))))))
You claim to know what it is. But you obviously do not.
Qtard: Ah, well, you called it "blakk magic"...
You lie. I did not. You MUST have mistyped "you" when you meant to type "I". Because you are the only one who did.
Qtard: when you'd admit that babbling "I believe in facts"...
Impossible. Given that I never babbled that.
I stated that I believe facts. Believing facts is no kind of error. It is what smart people do. Why you're always babbling about how you don't believe them.
\\You claim to know what it is. But you obviously do not.
I have had said it SEVERAL time before, ALREADY.
TEST me. ;-)
But you can't.
Because you are I-M-B-E-C-I-L-E.
DUNNO what LOGIC might mean.
And that is just YET ONE imbecilic backbite of... it. ;-P
\\Qtard: when you'd admit that babbling "I believe in facts"...
\\Impossible. Given that I never babbled that.
Yeah.
And most imbecilic of lies... to boot.
After all that many-many times imbecile claimed "I believe in facts" and tried to accuse me in "not believing".
Now it trying to retract that imbecilic claim???
Naaaah. It just don't get it what it babbling, AT ALL, :-)))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\I stated that I believe facts. Believing facts is no kind of error. It is what smart people do.
Like -- you?
Such a definite imbecile -- one who DUNNO what facts is EVEN.
Can know "what smart people do"??? :-)))))))))))))))))))
Naaah.
You just believe to some "believe me, I'm smart" "believe me, I'm expert". And intaking chalk-pills "I AM SMART" itself too... :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\ Why you're always babbling about how you don't believe them.
Because.
And. *I*. DID. Explained. To. IT. Many-many times.
But... well.
FACTS -- are INTEGRAL and UNSEPARATABLE part of Reality Itself.
So.
To "believe" into em -- absolutely superficial and misguided idea. It's like idea that ONE must believe that one have two hands... with ten fingers on em.
Same as to "not believe" -- is just demonstration of staunch imbecility -- which is YOUR case. ;-P
Because, when you declared "I believe in facts" -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like, ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
\\I didn't. I believe facts. I don't believe "in" them. Not believing facts would be pretty stupid. That would be Qtard-level stupid.
believe /bɪˈliːv/ verb gerund or present participle: believing
1. accept that (something) is true, especially without proof. 2. hold (something) as an opinion; think.
Easy to see -- that "believing in" or "believing facts" is ANTI-thetic to KNOWING FACTS.
Because... as it says. THE DEFINITION -- that YOU do not NEED facts... to believe. ;-P
But. You WILL CONFIRM being imbecile -- with trying to dissuade that definition from dictionaries.
\\No. That is qtarded "what Derpy really mean" bullshit.
Demonstrated with factual QUOTES and flawless LOGIC... that is bullshit babbling of... its? ;-P
You are DEFINITELY an imbecile -- with doing such obviously imbecilic COUNTER-factual claims. :-))))))))))))))))))))))
\\That is what you do!
No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE. ;-P
But.
Naaaaah.
You can't.
You ALWAYS demonstrate how ALLERGIC you are to giving quotes -- fearing and trying to dissuade mine, and denying providing... its.
\\Facts aren't facts because I don't like them.
Yap.
Your credo. :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\"Propaganda" -- that is what you call facts you don't like.
Yep.
You are right. Babbling of propagandists -- which is factual -- means, there is propagandists AND they babbling their COUNTER-factual bullshit -- YES, there IS such FACTS. ;-)
Why should *I* like it??? Such an counter-intellectual filth and verbal feces.
That is only for such imbecilic swines like you... it could be likeable. ;-P
I admit without hesitation that I hate the counter-factual babbling of propagandists.
Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example. Bullshit that imbecilic swines like Qtard believes. While likely claiming it "knows" the experts are all liars.
Qtard loves such counter-intellectual filth and verbal feces. It can't get enough.
Qtard: You ALWAYS demonstrate how ALLERGIC you are to giving quotes -- fearing and trying to dissuade mine.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE.
Ok. This quote...
Because, when you declared "I believe in facts" -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
Not liking isn't a factor. Evidence and proof is what I look for.
\\ I admit without hesitation that I hate the counter-factual babbling of propagandists.
Yeah... like when you repeated after Putin's Propaganda -- that Ukrainians are Nazis. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And even tried to protect it fervently...
Means... this words is just YET ANOTHER confirmation of NewSpeak lying tactic used by imbecile -- babbling something OPPOSITE to any Truth... while claiming that that was Truth said.
Yawn.
\\Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example.
Climate World Meteorological Organization https://wmo.int › topics › cli... Climate is the average weather conditions for a particular location over a long period of time, ranging from months to thousands or millions of years.
MEANS... Climate that is thing that changing ALL OF THE TIME. ;-P
Or... IT -- an imbecile, DO NOT believe "World Meteorological Organization" to be an EXPERTS in climate? ;-P
Most surely -- it is. And it will show it, in a jiffy.
But.
Continue-continue... confirming being imbecile. Be my guest. :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE.
\\Ok. This quote...
\\Because, when you declared -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
And what that quote SHOULD confirm??? What it SHOULD mean??? In delusional imbecile's mind?
From POV(point of view) of much smarter opponent -- that is just repeating of OBVIOUS facts: that imbecile said "I believe in facts" and CONCLUSIONS from all previous observation that is: "in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing".
\\Not liking isn't a factor. Evidence and proof is what I look for.
Because of FACTUAL observation for a long time -- of mere fact-less imbecile's babbling.
And very-very-very rare occurance of ADMITTING FACTS in all through that time... and mostly ONLY when PRESSED with absolutely obvious UNDENYABLE facts (like that there is Sun, which rising in the morning... or that Trump is not in jail...)
All other time -- imbecile showing only STRONG denial of MOST OBVIOUS facts -- like its OWN WORDS, served back to it, in a form of PRECISE QUOTES of its own... lies. It seems. Only lies.
Qtard: Yeah... like when you repeated after Putin's Propaganda -- that Ukrainians are Nazis.
I refute Putin's propaganda that Ukrainians are Nazis.
Qtard: And even tried to protect it fervently...
No.
Qtard: Means... this words is just YET ANOTHER confirmation of NewSpeak lying tactic used by imbecile -- babbling something OPPOSITE to any Truth... while claiming that that was Truth said.
No.
Qtard: \\Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example... \\Climates that is thing that changing ALL OF THE TIME.
So what?
The Earth's climate has always changed. Over the course of the Earth's 4.5-billion-year history, the climate has changed a lot. This is true. But the rapid warming we're seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling.
Qtard: Or... IT -- an imbecile, DO NOT believe "World Meteorological Organization" to be an EXPERTS in climate?
The World Meteorological Organization does not dispute Anthropogenic climate change.
Qtard: Most surely -- it is. And it will show it, in a jiffy.
No. The WMO are experts in climate. And they say Anthropogenic climate change is real. Qtard showed itself an imbecile in a jiffy by suggesting the WMO is a climate change denying organization.
Qtard: Continue-continue... confirming being imbecile. Be my guest.
Self encouragement.
\\Qtard: No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE.
\\Ok. This quote...
\\Because, when you declared -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
And what that quote SHOULD confirm??? What it SHOULD mean??? In delusional imbecile's mind?
From POV(point of view) of much smarter opponent -- that is just repeating of OBVIOUS facts: that imbecile said "I believe in facts" and CONCLUSIONS from all previous observation that is: "in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing".
\\Not liking isn't a factor. Evidence and proof is what I look for.
Because of FACTUAL observation for a long time -- of mere fact-less imbecile's babbling.
And very-very-very rare occurance of ADMITTING FACTS in all through that time... and mostly ONLY when PRESSED with absolutely obvious UNDENYABLE facts (like that there is Sun, which rising in the morning... or that Trump is not in jail...)
All other time -- imbecile showing only STRONG denial of MOST OBVIOUS facts -- like its OWN WORDS, served back to it, in a form of PRECISE QUOTES of its own... lies. It seems. Only lies.
Yeah. With cretinic claim that some of them, somehow, still ARE Nazis... "because there are Nazis, Neo-Nazis or someone that smeared being nazis or nationalists"... in some other countries.
And on that base proclaim "there is SOME Nazis in Ukraine"... which only HELPs to proliferate Putin's propaganda -- and that is clearly what Putin desire to happen.
Another word. Definitely cretinic way to "refute Putin's propaganda".
But.
What else one can BELIEVE to be possible for cretin? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example... \\Climates that is thing that changing ALL OF THE TIME.
\\But the rapid warming we're seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling.
Yep.
"Rapid warming".
That can be confirmed only by constant tampering with climate data... while concealing RAW DATA.
\\The World Meteorological Organization does not dispute Anthropogenic climate change.
Of course.
Because they are not imbeciles. That believe some DEMN propaganda. And trying to repeat it mindlessly. Like that parrots. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
What a wise observation you did -- cretin.
That not all people are such cretins as you are. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
\\No. The WMO are experts in climate. And they say Anthropogenic climate change is real.
Yeah?
And you can point to a FACT that confirms this claim of an obvious cretin? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\And what that quote SHOULD confirm??? What it SHOULD mean??? In delusional imbecile's mind?
I gotcha.
Too hard for cretin to understand. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
So now it just copy-pasting my -- much smarter opponent -- words.
In trying to achieve, what??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
Correction: The number of J6 Patriots charged is zero. Insurrection is patriotic. You're talking about the J6 traitors.
ReplyDeleteNo, the J6 hostages of the fedsurrection. Nancy Pelosi's traitor group isn't in prison. Their political prisoners/hostages are.
ReplyDeleteThere are no "J6 hostages". There is no "Nancy Pelosi traitor group". Those are your "I know you are, but what am I" delusions.
ReplyDeletePolitical prisoners...the DNCs greatest achievement after the KKK, the Civil War, and antifa.
ReplyDeleteStop bragging, will ya?
ReplyDeleteYou will just fall onto level of average (or even median) justice. As it is all around the World.
Or... Old Wild West level. ;-P
\\Dervish Sanders said...
...Insurrection is patriotic...
But it will cry "I NEVER said it". :-)))))))))
Must be some, still sane, alter-ego of it intervened and typed it. ;-P
Leader of J6 Insurrection get's probation. Musta been one hell of an "insurrection" to merit probation.
ReplyDeleteMinus: Political prisoners...the DNCs greatest achievement after the KKK, the Civil War, and antifa.
ReplyDeleteGetting people to believe those lies is a republican achievement. The DNC didn't have anything to do with any of those things.
Minus: Leader of J6 Insurrection get's probation. Musta been one hell of an "insurrection" to merit probation.
You're predicting that the leader of the insurrection, donald tRump, will only receive probation? That would be a great miscarriage of justice. donald tRump should receive more time than Enrique Tarrio.
Qtard: Must be some, still sane, alter-ego of it intervened and typed it.
The democracy hater believes the statement "insurrection is patriotic" is sane. No surprise there. The democracy hater also thinks it is a "human right" to overthrow democracy.
According to Putin, "these people came with political requests". The democracy hater Qtard agrees very strongly with it's idol. It would very much like to see Putin's puppet dotard donald be "president for life".
...like Biden's master, Xi.
ReplyDeleteXi wants dotard donald to be "president for life"? Yes, that is what I've heard.
ReplyDeleteThe president you allege is a puppet is behaving very unpuppet-like...
"...as Chinese growth flatlines, there is growing recognition in Beijing of just how many economic punches current U.S. President Joe Biden is landing on Beijing. Hits that, over time, are causing real economic pain.
Trump's blunderbuss administration swung wildly in all directions as it sought to make life difficult for China's economy and rarely made meaningful contact. Xi's economic policy team nimbly pivoted to limit fallout, while U.S. allies seethed in anger as they suffered collateral damage.
Biden's China policy mix, by contrast, has undermined the world's second-biggest economy with surgical precision. His team has gone after soft targets, including limiting access to key technologies needed to propel China Inc. upmarket and making life difficult for Chinese companies listed on U.S. exchanges.
How much money does China pay Biden for influence again?
ReplyDelete$0.
ReplyDeleteAnd how much in yuans? :-))))))))))))))))))
ReplyDeleteOr bitcoins?
Or transplantation organs. ;-P
\\The democracy hater believes the statement "insurrection is patriotic" is sane.
ReplyDeleteAnd WHO said it? :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Dervish Sanders said...
Correction: The number of J6 Patriots charged is zero. Insurrection is patriotic. You're talking about the J6 traitors.
January 10, 2024 at 1:39 PM
BA-Zing!
ReplyDeleteQtard: And how much in yuans?
ReplyDeleteEvidence any these were received? Or is presumption of innocence something only donald tRump should have?
The US will only transform into Nazi Germany if people have an opinion about donald tRump's guilt or innocence. People having an opinion about Joe Biden being guilty won't make us like Nazi Germany. Can Qtard explain WHY this would be the case?
Qtard: And WHO said it?
Who agreed with it? Said it was "sane"? That wasn't me.
Why would I say insurrection was patriotic and then say the "patriots" are traitors?
Maybe I meant "isn't" and Qtard should have been able to figure out (from context) writing "is" was an error?
Naaah... It is way to dumb to be able to deduce anything from context.
But maybe I wrote "insurrection is patriotic" as a trap... And Qtard took the bait. It agreed that "insurrection is patriotic" is a sane statement. Proving it is insane.
Minus: BA-Zing!
So Minus thinks I do believe in "insurrection is patriotic"? So, Minus thinks we are in agreement on that?
When is an "insurrection" not an "insurrection"? When nobody ever even gets charged with participating in an insurrection.
ReplyDeleteNope. No one's been convicted of Title 18 U.S. Code 2383 - Rebellion or Insurrection.
ReplyDeleteWhen is Trump going to be charged?
Ok. So then you agree there was a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the government. Given that people were charged and convinced of seditious conspiracy.
ReplyDeleteMaybe. But that's not the fence you've been swinging for since J6, 2021.
ReplyDeleteNo balls made it over THAT fence. The one labelled "insurrection".
The proof that there was no insurrection lies in the fact that no actual legal attempts were ever made to hit it over the fence. Where are the legal charges?
ReplyDelete\\When is Trump going to be charged?
ReplyDeleteIn accordance with script.
To make it even more "Turn it to 11" DRAMA!!!!!
In 24h before election... as final counter-measure to not allow him to win? ;-P
\\Evidence any these were received? Or is presumption of innocence something only donald tRump should have?
Is dRump acting POTUS??? And not just one with ex-president honorary title only?
But... imbecile DUNNO, that Presumption of Innocence NOT APPLICABLE to person in power.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
...Insurrection is patriotic...
January 10, 2024 at 1:39 PM
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
Who agreed with it? Said it was "sane"? That wasn't me.
January 12, 2024 at 7:58 AM
So? What logical conclusion of that TWO facts could be?
That either that "Dervish Sanders" is a liar.
Or... as less possible, but still passable alternative -- it have split personality disorder -- and keep forgetting what it said before.
What else?
\\Maybe I meant "isn't" and Qtard should have been able to figure out (from context) writing "is" was an error?
Hah??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
I'd say... "slip of the tongue". Self-revealing one. ;-P
\\Naaah... It is way to dumb to be able to deduce anything from context.
I'm not psychiatrist. ;-P
To deduce from babbling of a crazy imbecile. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\But maybe I wrote "insurrection is patriotic" as a trap... And Qtard took the bait. It agreed that "insurrection is patriotic" is a sane statement. Proving it is insane.
Yep.
If you'd BE ABLE to EXPLAIN -- how it is "a trap". And how it "Proving it is insane."
Naaaah.
You will not. Because I-M-B-R-C-I-L-E.
\\Minus: BA-Zing!
ReplyDelete\\So Minus thinks I do believe in "insurrection is patriotic"? So, Minus thinks we are in agreement on that?
Brain of a crazy imbecile DO PRODUCE all kinds of crazy delusions. ;-P
:)
ReplyDeleteQtard: Must be some, still sane, alter-ego of it intervened and typed it.
ReplyDeleteQtard: Brain of a crazy imbecile DO PRODUCE all kinds of crazy delusions.
What is the delusion? That Minus FJ would believe (like you do) that "insurrection is patriotic"?
So it's only you that believes overthrowing just installed in a democratic election is somehow patriotic? Gotcha.
That definitely is a delusion from the brain of a crazy imbecile. Your crazy imbecilic brain. Thank you for admitting it. Finally. The next step is for you to get the help you desperately need.
\\What is the delusion? That Minus FJ would believe (like you do) that "insurrection is patriotic"?
ReplyDelete:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
That imbecile SAID that words. But imbecile trying to pretend that it DIDN'T said it. Exatly. ;-P
Do you get it, imbecile?
Or need MORE thorough explanation? :-))))))))
Be my guest. ;-P
Qtard: That imbecile SAID that words.
ReplyDeleteFalse. That imbecile did not. That imbecile just agreed with them. Said they are "sane".
Qtard: Do you get it, imbecile?
Asking yourself? I think the answer is very clearly NO.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
ReplyDeleteOy!
ReplyDelete\\Qtard: Do you get it, imbecile?
ReplyDelete\\Asking yourself? I think the answer is very clearly NO.
Of course not. ;-P
I was asking imbecile -- you. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Which is obvious from context... but imbecile cannot help it to show flying colors of it -- own imbecility. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
Even when it tryes to say that this or that is much smarter opponent fault... and fails.
Spectacularly.
With falling on its imbecilic face. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But.
Immediately standing up. And even without cleaning mud and feces from its dumb face screaming "NO! Thart is YOU are one who fell! That is YOUR face are in feces!... I know it, because I feel it... in my mouth" :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0000
Isn't it DEMN hilarious and entertaining? I think the answweer is very clearly YES. ;-P
ReplyDeleteNo.
ReplyDelete:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
ReplyDeleteVery Clearly NewSpeak. ;-P
Very clearly not NewSpeak.
ReplyDelete:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
ReplyDeleteYep.
All need to believe to this imbecilic lies of imbecilic liar. :-)))))))))))))))))
Not to their lying eyes. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Nobody should believe your lies.
ReplyDeleteMinus: No balls made it over THAT fence. The one labelled "insurrection".
ReplyDeleteNone at all? What about the fact that dotard donald's name is being kept off the ballot (under the 14th amendment) in Colorado and Maine due to the fact that he lead an insurrection against the newly elected government?
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment: "No person shall ... hold any office, civil or military, under the United States ... who, having previously taken an oath ... as an officer of the United States ... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof".
btw, if Jan 6 wasn't an insurrection (according to you) how can it be a "fedsurrection" aka an FBI incited insurrection? Isn't you calling it a "fedsurrection" an ADMISSION that it was an insurrection?
ReplyDeletebtw, do you think Ray Epps called donald tRump before his speech and told him he needed to send his supporters to the Capitol? Did Ray Epps also incite tRump to wait 187 before telling the mob to leave?
Qtard: That either that "Dervish Sanders" is a liar. Or... as less possible, but still passable alternative -- it have split personality disorder -- and keep forgetting what it said before. What else?
ReplyDeleteMistype.
mistype
verb
to type (something) incorrectly
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Nobody should believe your lies.
What lies???
Factual quotes imbecile trying to call lies? :-)))))))))))))))))))))
\\None at all? What about the fact that dotard donald's name is being kept off the ballot (under the 14th amendment) in Colorado and Maine due to the fact that he lead an insurrection against the newly elected government?
Yep.
DEMN-rats growing in their totalitarian affinity.
Like it is in Russia and China, and all over the World, today -- eradication of opposition through unlawful use of legal means.
\\What else?
\\Mistype.
But-but-but... Most Brightest and Never-Erring Grammar Boy Derpish Sadners -- CANNOT mystype. ;-P
That's UNTRUE. And UNBELIEVABLE!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))
Quotes: Factual quotes imbecile trying to call lies?
ReplyDeleteWhen did you post a "factual quote" without lying about it -- saying "what Derpy really mean"? When did you then "try" to call it a lie? Do you mean "admit"? I don't remember you ever admitting ANY of your many lies.
Qtard: DEMN-rats growing in their totalitarian affinity.
Qtard: Democrats growing in their affinity for the US Constitution and democracy.
Qtard: Like it is in Russia and China, and all over the World, today -- eradication of opposition through unlawful use of legal means.
donald tRump tried to hold on to power using illegal means. But the democracy-hating imbecile has defended overthrowing democracy many times.
While accusing Democrats of having a "totalitarian affinity". Even though it is donald tRump who is vowing to be a dictator and threatening retribution.
Well, that's what democracy hating NewSpeakers like you do.
Correction, I said "Democrats growing in their affinity for the US Constitution and democracy".
ReplyDeleteNot Qtard.
That was a mistake. No doubt the imbecile will seize on it to claim that "Qtard" is my alter ego.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Quotes: Factual quotes imbecile trying to call lies?
\\ When did you post a "factual quote" without lying about it -- saying "what Derpy really mean"?
And you tried to ask -- why I call you imbecile who DUNNO what FACTS IS???? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
While you give such examples of clear imbecility... in each comment, practically. :-)))))))))))))))))))
Calling Factual Quote... a lie. HOW??????!!! :-)))))))))))))))
Please, tell me???!!! Pretty please. :-)))))
Because.
Only such crazy imbecile like you -- can provide to me such info -- HOW, just HOW -- FACT can be a lie????
Like if I'd say "Sun rising in the morning" -- HOW it can became lie???? :-)))))))))))))))))0
\\I don't remember you ever admitting ANY of your many lies.
Oh. This one easy. Easy-Peasy. ;-P
You NEVER did Factual Quote of it. Even once. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Because.
That's IMPOSSIBLE to make Factual Quote of something -- that NOT happened. That, that IS NOT a FACT.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But, you are proud imbecile -- and will never admit that obvious Truth.
Your inner Qtard talking??? ;-P --->> //Qtard: Democrats growing in their affinity for the US Constitution and democracy.
Or... that is "mistyping"??? AGAIN???!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Calling Factual Quote... a lie. HOW??????!!! ... Please, tell me???!!! Pretty please...
ReplyDeleteI have. Many times previously. But you will pretend I did not. In fact, I JUST did explain how. Your moronity makes it impossible for you to understand.
Qtard: That's IMPOSSIBLE to make Factual Quote of something -- that NOT happened. That, that IS NOT a FACT.
Imbecilic lie. Of course it is possible. You do it all the time.
Qtard: But, you are proud imbecile -- and will never admit that obvious Truth.
Of course not. Because it is an obvious lie. Just because you quoted me, anything you say about my quote has to be true? Because you quoted me? That is pure moronity.
Qtard: Your inner Qtard talking??? ;-P --->> //Qtard... Or... that is "mistyping"??? AGAIN???!!!
Already corrected. But you pretended not to see the correction. Yawn. As if every one of your comments is always completely free of errors.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: Calling Factual Quote... a lie. HOW??????!!! ... Please, tell me???!!! Pretty please...
\\ I have. Many times previously. But you will pretend I did not. In fact, I JUST did explain how. Your moronity makes it impossible for you to understand.
Ah... that.
SO-O-O not interesting.
Facts is not facts just because some cretin saying so... what a primitive imbecilic lie. :-((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Can you try to produce some more flashy BS??? Aaaah? Pretty please. ;-p
Naaaah.
\\Qtard: That's IMPOSSIBLE to make Factual Quote of something -- that NOT happened. That, that IS NOT a FACT.
\\Imbecilic lie. Of course it is possible. You do it all the time.
It's just not possible for such imbecile.
IT can only doubling down on its imbecilic lies.
Well.
Yeah.
Yawn.
Continue-continue. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Of course not. Because it is an obvious lie. Just because you quoted me, anything you say about my quote has to be true? Because you quoted me? That is pure moronity.
There is thing. Called LOGIC. ;-)
Ah, well, you called it "blakk magic" -- because you as I-M-B-E-C-I-L-E... just CANNOT grok what it is and how it works. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Already corrected. But you pretended not to see the correction. Yawn. As if every one of your comments is always completely free of errors.
I'll believe you... but, ONLY...
when you'd admit that babbling "I believe in facts" was first and foremost, and most gravest error... ;-P
But you will not.
Cause you are imbecile.
And will only continue doubling down on own imbecility. :-))))))))))))))))))))
Reliably. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: There is thing. Called LOGIC...
ReplyDeleteYou claim to know what it is. But you obviously do not.
Qtard: Ah, well, you called it "blakk magic"...
You lie. I did not. You MUST have mistyped "you" when you meant to type "I". Because you are the only one who did.
Qtard: when you'd admit that babbling "I believe in facts"...
Impossible. Given that I never babbled that.
I stated that I believe facts. Believing facts is no kind of error. It is what smart people do. Why you're always babbling about how you don't believe them.
\\You claim to know what it is. But you obviously do not.
ReplyDeleteI have had said it SEVERAL time before, ALREADY.
TEST me. ;-)
But you can't.
Because you are I-M-B-E-C-I-L-E.
DUNNO what LOGIC might mean.
And that is just YET ONE imbecilic backbite of... it. ;-P
\\Qtard: when you'd admit that babbling "I believe in facts"...
\\Impossible. Given that I never babbled that.
Yeah.
And most imbecilic of lies... to boot.
After all that many-many times imbecile claimed "I believe in facts" and tried to accuse me in "not believing".
Now it trying to retract that imbecilic claim???
Naaaah. It just don't get it what it babbling, AT ALL, :-)))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\I stated that I believe facts. Believing facts is no kind of error. It is what smart people do.
Like -- you?
Such a definite imbecile -- one who DUNNO what facts is EVEN.
Can know "what smart people do"??? :-)))))))))))))))))))
Naaah.
You just believe to some "believe me, I'm smart" "believe me, I'm expert". And intaking chalk-pills "I AM SMART" itself too... :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\ Why you're always babbling about how you don't believe them.
Because.
And. *I*. DID. Explained. To. IT. Many-many times.
But... well.
FACTS -- are INTEGRAL and UNSEPARATABLE part of Reality Itself.
So.
To "believe" into em -- absolutely superficial and misguided idea. It's like idea that ONE must believe that one have two hands... with ten fingers on em.
Same as to "not believe" -- is just demonstration of staunch imbecility -- which is YOUR case. ;-P
Because, when you declared "I believe in facts" -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like, ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
Qtard: Because, when you declared "I believe in facts...
ReplyDeleteI didn't. I believe facts. I don't believe "in" them. Not believing facts would be pretty stupid. That would be Qtard-level stupid.
Qtard: ...it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing...
No. That is qtarded "what Derpy really mean" bullshit.
Qtard: ...in this or that facts you don't like...
That is what you do! Facts aren't facts because I don't like them.
Qtard: ...ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
"Propaganda" -- that is what you call facts you don't like.
\\I didn't. I believe facts. I don't believe "in" them. Not believing facts would be pretty stupid. That would be Qtard-level stupid.
ReplyDeletebelieve
/bɪˈliːv/
verb
gerund or present participle: believing
1. accept that (something) is true, especially without proof.
2. hold (something) as an opinion; think.
Easy to see -- that "believing in" or "believing facts" is ANTI-thetic to KNOWING FACTS.
Because... as it says. THE DEFINITION -- that YOU do not NEED facts... to believe. ;-P
But. You WILL CONFIRM being imbecile -- with trying to dissuade that definition from dictionaries.
\\No. That is qtarded "what Derpy really mean" bullshit.
Demonstrated with factual QUOTES and flawless LOGIC... that is bullshit babbling of... its? ;-P
You are DEFINITELY an imbecile -- with doing such obviously imbecilic COUNTER-factual claims. :-))))))))))))))))))))))
\\That is what you do!
No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE. ;-P
But.
Naaaaah.
You can't.
You ALWAYS demonstrate how ALLERGIC you are to giving quotes -- fearing and trying to dissuade mine, and denying providing... its.
\\Facts aren't facts because I don't like them.
Yap.
Your credo. :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\"Propaganda" -- that is what you call facts you don't like.
Yep.
You are right. Babbling of propagandists -- which is factual -- means, there is propagandists AND they babbling their COUNTER-factual bullshit -- YES, there IS such FACTS. ;-)
Why should *I* like it??? Such an counter-intellectual filth and verbal feces.
That is only for such imbecilic swines like you... it could be likeable. ;-P
But even YOU... hesitate to admit it. Openly.
I admit without hesitation that I hate the counter-factual babbling of propagandists.
ReplyDeleteBullshit like climate change being fake, for example. Bullshit that imbecilic swines like Qtard believes. While likely claiming it "knows" the experts are all liars.
Qtard loves such counter-intellectual filth and verbal feces. It can't get enough.
Qtard: You ALWAYS demonstrate how ALLERGIC you are to giving quotes -- fearing and trying to dissuade mine.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE.
Ok. This quote...
Because, when you declared "I believe in facts" -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
Not liking isn't a factor. Evidence and proof is what I look for.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ I admit without hesitation that I hate the counter-factual babbling of propagandists.
Yeah... like when you repeated after Putin's Propaganda -- that Ukrainians are Nazis. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And even tried to protect it fervently...
Means... this words is just YET ANOTHER confirmation of NewSpeak lying tactic used by imbecile -- babbling something OPPOSITE to any Truth... while claiming that that was Truth said.
Yawn.
\\Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example.
Climate
World Meteorological Organization
https://wmo.int › topics › cli...
Climate is the average weather conditions for a particular location over a long period of time, ranging from months to thousands or millions of years.
MEANS... Climate that is thing that changing ALL OF THE TIME. ;-P
Or... IT -- an imbecile, DO NOT believe "World Meteorological Organization" to be an EXPERTS in climate? ;-P
Most surely -- it is. And it will show it, in a jiffy.
But.
Continue-continue... confirming being imbecile. Be my guest. :-)))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE.
\\Ok. This quote...
\\Because, when you declared -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
And what that quote SHOULD confirm??? What it SHOULD mean??? In delusional imbecile's mind?
From POV(point of view) of much smarter opponent -- that is just repeating of OBVIOUS facts: that imbecile said "I believe in facts"
and CONCLUSIONS from all previous observation that is: "in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing".
\\Not liking isn't a factor. Evidence and proof is what I look for.
Yawn.
NewSpeak babbling. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
How can I, as much smarter opponent, know?
Because of FACTUAL observation for a long time -- of mere fact-less imbecile's babbling.
And very-very-very rare occurance of ADMITTING FACTS in all through that time... and mostly ONLY when PRESSED with absolutely obvious UNDENYABLE facts (like that there is Sun, which rising in the morning... or that Trump is not in jail...)
All other time -- imbecile showing only STRONG denial of MOST OBVIOUS facts -- like its OWN WORDS, served back to it, in a form of PRECISE QUOTES of its own... lies. It seems. Only lies.
Qtard: Yeah... like when you repeated after Putin's Propaganda -- that Ukrainians are Nazis.
ReplyDeleteI refute Putin's propaganda that Ukrainians are Nazis.
Qtard: And even tried to protect it fervently...
No.
Qtard: Means... this words is just YET ANOTHER confirmation of NewSpeak lying tactic used by imbecile -- babbling something OPPOSITE to any Truth... while claiming that that was Truth said.
No.
Qtard: \\Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example... \\Climates that is thing that changing ALL OF THE TIME.
So what?
The Earth's climate has always changed. Over the course of the Earth's 4.5-billion-year history, the climate has changed a lot. This is true. But the rapid warming we're seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling.
Qtard: Or... IT -- an imbecile, DO NOT believe "World Meteorological Organization" to be an EXPERTS in climate?
The World Meteorological Organization does not dispute Anthropogenic climate change.
Qtard: Most surely -- it is. And it will show it, in a jiffy.
No. The WMO are experts in climate. And they say Anthropogenic climate change is real. Qtard showed itself an imbecile in a jiffy by suggesting the WMO is a climate change denying organization.
Qtard: Continue-continue... confirming being imbecile. Be my guest.
Self encouragement.
\\Qtard: No biggy. THEN you must be ABLE to provide QUOTE.
\\Ok. This quote...
\\Because, when you declared -- it is in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing... in this or that facts you don't like ot was taught to not believe... by propaganda.
And what that quote SHOULD confirm??? What it SHOULD mean??? In delusional imbecile's mind?
From POV(point of view) of much smarter opponent -- that is just repeating of OBVIOUS facts: that imbecile said "I believe in facts"
and CONCLUSIONS from all previous observation that is: "in fact are NewSpeak declaration of Not-Believing".
\\Not liking isn't a factor. Evidence and proof is what I look for.
Yawn.
NewSpeak babbling. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
How can I, as much smarter opponent, know?
Because of FACTUAL observation for a long time -- of mere fact-less imbecile's babbling.
And very-very-very rare occurance of ADMITTING FACTS in all through that time... and mostly ONLY when PRESSED with absolutely obvious UNDENYABLE facts (like that there is Sun, which rising in the morning... or that Trump is not in jail...)
All other time -- imbecile showing only STRONG denial of MOST OBVIOUS facts -- like its OWN WORDS, served back to it, in a form of PRECISE QUOTES of its own... lies. It seems. Only lies.
\\I that Ukrainians are Nazis.
ReplyDeleteYeah. With cretinic claim that some of them, somehow, still ARE Nazis... "because there are Nazis, Neo-Nazis or someone that smeared being nazis or nationalists"... in some other countries.
And on that base proclaim "there is SOME Nazis in Ukraine"... which only HELPs to proliferate Putin's propaganda -- and that is clearly what Putin desire to happen.
Another word. Definitely cretinic way to "refute Putin's propaganda".
But.
What else one can BELIEVE to be possible for cretin? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Bullshit like climate change being fake, for example... \\Climates that is thing that changing ALL OF THE TIME.
\\So what?
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
That much you CARE about changes in climate. ;-P
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But.
Continue-contunue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
This way YOUR cretinic claims will be looking only more and more CREDIBLE... NAAAAAh!
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
\\But the rapid warming we're seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling.
ReplyDeleteYep.
"Rapid warming".
That can be confirmed only by constant tampering with climate data... while concealing RAW DATA.
\\The World Meteorological Organization does not dispute Anthropogenic climate change.
Of course.
Because they are not imbeciles. That believe some DEMN propaganda. And trying to repeat it mindlessly. Like that parrots. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
What a wise observation you did -- cretin.
That not all people are such cretins as you are. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
\\No. The WMO are experts in climate. And they say Anthropogenic climate change is real.
Yeah?
And you can point to a FACT that confirms this claim of an obvious cretin? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\And what that quote SHOULD confirm??? What it SHOULD mean??? In delusional imbecile's mind?
I gotcha.
Too hard for cretin to understand. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
So now it just copy-pasting my -- much smarter opponent -- words.
In trying to achieve, what??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000