Monday, December 11, 2023

More Democrat Dirty Tricks Revealed

Grassley says Democrats officially no longer enforce laws against Democrats or act with impartiality and actively retaliate against whistleblowers.

72 comments:

  1. The title of your post is wrong. It should read "More Republican Dirty Tricks Revealed".

    Grassley's lies about Democrats is definitely a dirty trick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor Assface Derpish! The truth is a bigly booboo that slapped his assface!😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

      Delete
  2. Poor Dervy, the truth of Democratic Party perfidies too much for you?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The truth about republiturd Party perfidies seems to be too much for you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know the truth, I'm not a Democrap, like you. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are completely clueless about what truth even is. This blog is the proof.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No tinfoil hat nuttery on mine. That's bad?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't say it's bad, I say it's good. Obviously you disagree. Why your blog is chock full of such nuttery.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You've confirmed this by visiting the town where I live? Walking the streets, talking to people. Even though "Dervish Sanders" is an alias, somehow everyone in the town where I live knows my real name? It's either Anthony or Allen Sanders. Did you talk to my relatives Cheryl, Vince and Mavis -- and that was their opinion?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Chuck Grassley's dirty tricks revealed...

    Former Vice President Mike Pence briefly considered not presiding over the ceremony that formalized his coup-attempting boss’s 2020 election loss, once again raising questions about the contemporaneous scheming about Iowa's Chuck Grassley presiding in his stead.

    In his daily planner, in which he also took journal-like notes, Pence on Christmas Eve in 2020 wrote it might be better to abdicate his constitutionally proscribed role overseeing the Electoral College tally to avoid bruising then-President Donald Trump's ego.

    "Not feeling like I should attend electoral count", he wrote, according to a report Tuesday by ABC News. "Too many questions, too many doubts, too hurtful to my friend. Therefore I’m not going to participate in certification of election".

    Grassley, on Jan. 5, 2021, told reporters, "If the vice president isn’t there, and we don't expect him to be there, I will be presiding over the Senate...". link

    Grassley would have done what Pence did not... helped dotard donald steal the presidency.



    ReplyDelete
  10. Grassley wouldn't have adjourned the session allowing the challenge to fail because of the fake J6 "emergency" evacuation? I guess Nancy Pelosi's successful coup would have failed then.

    ReplyDelete
  11. dotard donald wouldn't have sent his minions to the Capitol if it was Grassley instead of Pence presiding. "Nancy Pelosi's coup" never was planned or happened. The coup that failed was dotard donald's.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It wasn't planned? Then why did Democrats hold a rehearsal evacuation on J5?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Says who? You didn't give a link. I Googled but couldn't find anything. Did Nancy Pelosi also hire a dotard donald look-alike to incite tRump supporters to march to the Capitol and violently attack it? Why hasn't dotard donald ever mentioned this? Said, "that wasn't me who told my supporters to go to the Capitol, it was an imposter"?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Google it yourself. It was a "democrats only" event sponsored by the Speaker.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Maybe her daughters film crew needed to know where to put the camera dolly tracks.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Shay Moss and Ruby Freeman are about to become millionaires? I just heard on the news that the judge in the defamation case they brought is going to order Rudy pay them a bigly amount of money 😊

    The good guys win while the bad guys lose. :P

    ReplyDelete
  17. Minus: Google it yourself. It was a "democrats only" event sponsored by the Speaker.

    I don't believe you. Not your characterization, at least. Safety procedures are often practiced. You never had a tornado or fire drill in school?

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's funny how people who actively support censoring the internet so often demand censored evidence.

    But it's true, nonetheless.

    As for Giuliani, I feel sorry for him. The self-same censorship industrial complex prevents him from defending himself. It must be "social justice", huh, Dervy? Cuz it sure ain't justice.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hesiod, "Works and days"

    [225] But they who give straight judgements to strangers and to the men of the land, and go not aside from what is just, their city flourishes, and the people prosper in it: Peace, the nurse of children, is abroad in their land, and all-seeing Zeus never decrees cruel war against them. Neither famine nor disaster ever haunt men who do true justice; but light-heartedly they tend the fields which are all their care. The earth bears them victual in plenty, and on the mountains the oak bears acorns upon the top and bees in the midst. Their woolly sheep are laden with fleeces; their women bear children like their parents. They flourish continually with good things, and do not travel on ships, for the grain-giving earth bears them fruit.

    [238] But for those who practise violence and cruel deeds far-seeing Zeus, the son of Cronos, ordains a punishment. Often even a whole city suffers for a bad man who sins and devises presumptuous deeds, and the son of Cronos lays great trouble upon the people, famine and plague together, so that the men perish away, and their women do not bear children, and their houses become few, through the contriving of Olympian Zeus. And again, at another time, the son of Cronos either destroys their wide army, or their walls, or else makes an end of their ships on the sea.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Shay Moss and Ruby Freeman were awarded $74 million EACH.

    What censored evidence?

    I laugh at Giuliani. There will soon be even biglier judgements against him in the coming Dominion and Smartmatic lawsuits. He will die a pauper.

    And he could go to prison re the Georgia indictment.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Attorney John Langford [said] they plan to ensure that Moss and Freeman “see every bit of money that Mr. Giuliani has available to him, to pay and satisfy this judgment” and are “looking at every option (they) have to obtain the money that he owes Ruby and Shaye.”

    They plan, Langford said, to move quickly toward getting a final judgment entered in order to go to other jurisdictions where Giuliani has assets.

    Ryan Goodman, a former special counsel at the Department of Defense, told Burnett that it’s likely the election workers will collect only “a fraction” of the awarded amount. “There is no way they’ll collect (the total judgment), and I don’t think they’ll collect half the amount or a quarter of the amount, just a fraction. But . link

    ReplyDelete
  22. But I do think maybe they will collect millions.

    ReplyDelete
  23. ...only to have to return it all upon appeal. :(

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm sure that they'll spend anything they are able to collect as fast as they can.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The verdict will be upheld on appeal. Rudy shouldn't waste more of Shay and Ruby's money on legal cases that have already been decided.

    ReplyDelete
  26. lol! You should apply to be Rudy's "financial advisor".

    ReplyDelete
  27. ...oh, that's right. No qualifications other than "mentalist/ mind reader"...

    ReplyDelete
  28. ...but hey, are you, by any chance, blacK? Maybe you could magically disappear Rudy's legal problems!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Whose mind did you read to determine that Rudy would win on appeal? Maybe he should countersue and win? Then they will have to pay him.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Maybe he should countersue and win?

    Sounds like a plan!

    ReplyDelete
  31. If wishes were horses beggers would ride.

    I read that somewhere. I think it applies to Rudy's situation.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yep, sounds like Ruby and her daughter are riding today....

    ReplyDelete
  33. \\ Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...

    \\ If wishes were horses beggers would ride.


    Not surprising that somebody said something like that to Derpy.

    And even less, that it didn't get it and decided to repeat it, which showing that it didn't get it. :-))))))))))))))))

    Pulling Charlie Gordon.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Minus: Yep, sounds like Ruby and her daughter are riding today....

    Actual horses. If they wanted to buy them. Given that they will soon be millionaires.

    Qtard: ...it didn't get it and decided to repeat it, which showing that it didn't get it.

    You? That's obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  35. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    Using "you" instead of "I"... obviously. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  36. Why would I use incorrect grammar like you? If I meant "me" that is what I would have written. But I didn't. I wrote YOU because I meant YOU.

    Why would I write "I"? I know how to speak and write English.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Cause... it... are crazy bonker -- Derr Punn, which like to go under name Derpish Sadners. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  38. "it" is you. The self described foreigner from far far away.

    Qtard: ...which like to go under name Derpish Sadners.

    You again. As you previously admitted. "Derpish Sadners" is one of your alter egos. It is sad that it is such a moron.

    I know I do not "like to go under" that name.

    ReplyDelete
  39. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Perfect Cringing!

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  40. Imaginary cringing Qtard sees in it's delusions.

    ReplyDelete
  41. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  42. Qtard cringes via its nervous laughter.

    Nervous laughter is laughter provoked from an audience's expression of alarm, embarrassment, discomfort or confusion, rather than amusement. Source: Wikipedia.

    ReplyDelete
  43. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  44. Continue-continue... pulling Charlie Gordon. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    ReplyDelete
  45. You dunno what "pulling a Charlie Gordon" means. It's when Charlie does/says something stupid and his friends laugh at him -- and he laughs with them.

    We aren't friends, I didn't write anything stupid and I've definitely never laughed along with you at myself.

    Maybe Qtard is laughing at itself along with itself? Because it did something stupid? That is the only explanation that makes sense. Meaning -- you pulled the Charlie Gordon.

    ReplyDelete
  46. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    Continue-continue, charlie Gordon. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    That still thinks with its moronic brain that I talking with it seriously. :-))))))))))))))))00

    ReplyDelete
  47. Self encouragement.

    ReplyDelete
  48. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0


    Continue-continue, charlie Gordon. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    ReplyDelete
  49. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  50. No more drooling imbecility showed here? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  51. LOTS more shown. In the proceeding 3 comments.

    ReplyDelete
  52. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00

    ReplyDelete
  53. Even more drooling imbecility shown.

    ReplyDelete
  54. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Continue-continue. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Confirming INABILITY to say something from itself. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  55. If all I'm doing is repeating your words, on what basis are you constantly attacking me? Obviously it must agree that it's own words are stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  56. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) <--- is it attacking? ;-P

    That is just your imbecilic delusion. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    ReplyDelete
  57. I thought you were laughing at (as per your delusions) my moronity. How is that not attacking?

    ReplyDelete
  58. And how it is? ;-P :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  59. No imbecilic "explanayions"? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  60. Asking yourself for "explanayions"? I dunno even know what an "explanayion" is.

    ReplyDelete
  61. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Genuinely imbecilic reaction here too. :-))))))))))))))))

    Continue-continue. :-))))))))))))))))0

    ReplyDelete
  62. Self encouragement again.

    ReplyDelete
  63. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    Derpish SADners -- master of imbecilic backbites! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete