Sunday, August 6, 2023

Attack of the Drones...

Plato, "Republic"
When a young man who has been brought up as we were just now describing, in a vulgar and miserly way, has tasted drones’ honey and has come to associate with fierce and crafty natures who are able to provide for him all sorts of refinements and varieties of pleasure—then, as you may imagine, the change will begin of the oligarchical principle within him into the democratical?

...

Well, I said, I meant to refer to the class of idle spendthrifts, of whom the more courageous are the leaders and the more timid the followers, the same whom we were comparing to drones, some stingless, and others having stings.

A very just comparison.

These two classes are the plagues of every city in which they are generated, being what phlegm and bile are to the body. And the good physician and lawgiver of the State ought, like the wise bee-master, to keep them at a distance and prevent, if possible, their ever coming in; and if they have anyhow found a way in, then he should have them and their cells cut out as speedily as possible.

Yes, by all means, he said.

Then, in order that we may see clearly what we are doing, let us imagine democracy to be divided, as indeed it is, into three classes; for in the first place freedom creates rather more drones in the democratic than there were in the oligarchical State.

That is true.

And in the democracy they are certainly more intensified.

How so?

Because in the oligarchical State they are disqualified and driven from office, and therefore they cannot train or gather strength; whereas in a democracy they are almost the entire ruling power, and while the keener sort speak and act, the rest keep buzzing about the bema and do not suffer a word to be said on the other side; hence in democracies almost everything is managed by the drones.

Very true, he said.

Then there is another class which is always being severed from the mass.

What is that?
They are the orderly class, which in a nation of traders is sure to be the richest.
Naturally so.

They are the most squeezable persons and yield the largest amount of honey to the drones.

Why, he said, there is little to be squeezed out of people who have little.

And this is called the wealthy class, and the drones feed upon them.

That is pretty much the case, he said.

The people are a third class, consisting of those who work with their own hands; they are not politicians, and have not much to live upon. This, when assembled, is the largest and most powerful class in a democracy.

True, he said; but then the multitude is seldom willing to congregate unless they get a little honey.

And do they not share? I said. Do not their leaders deprive the rich of their estates and distribute them among the people; at the same time taking care to reserve the larger part for themselves?

Why, yes, he said, to that extent the people do share.

And the persons whose property is taken from them are compelled to defend themselves before the people as they best can?

What else can they do?

And then, although they may have no desire of change, the others charge them with plotting against the people and being friends of oligarchy?

True.

And the end is that when they see the people, not of their own accord, but through ignorance, and because they are deceived by informers, seeking to do them wrong, then at last they are forced to become oligarchs in reality; they do not wish to be, but the sting of the drones torments them and breeds revolution in them.

That is exactly the truth.

Then come impeachments and judgments and trials of one another.

True.

The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness.

Yes, that is their way.

This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears above ground he is a protector.

Yes, that is quite clear.

More on the subject.

3 comments:

  1. Yawn.

    Cybernetics. ;-)

    When our ancestors was hunting their prey... there need to be some Leader.

    ONE who would deliver final blow.

    And there need to be his... minons, drones you can call em... or partners... or elements of that strategic games.

    One who would rise pray from its nest. Make it running. Direct it to the Leader.

    THAT is the way ALL tribe could have some decent meal.

    But times when it became agriculture. Where final result became spread among many, and nearly independently from efforts...

    I am not one to blame it, or propose to return to gathering/hunting.

    That... would be moronic. Given with that amount of resources, entertainment and power that path leaded us to.

    But... only to point at how it corelate with such a "phenomenological" thoughts and talks -- that DO NOT pierce through ESSENCE of THINGS...

    but just striking over it...

    to miss the point (completely?) and redirect it, into aimless wild guss chase. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  2. What do you think of the parricde of the "primordial father" by the "band of brothers" in Freud's "Totem and Taboo" (the birth of law and religion?)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your know my answer already. "Old wisdoms became not that precise, or even outdated... with time". ;-)

    Will religion even suirvive... through next cultural bottlneck? So, why bother to talk about it?

    ALAS.

    "We all do what we must to do" (c) ??? know that ref? Well, YouTube could help.

    ReplyDelete