Thursday, February 20, 2020

On Saving the Russia-Russia Narrative...

19 comments:

  1. What needs "saving" are your Russian conspiracy theories. The TRUTH about what happened during the run up to the 2016 election has been CONFIRMED by our intelligence agencies, the Mueller report, and the publicly available facts. Assange is a Russian stooge.

    Quote: It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is: a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia", Pompeo said at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. [end quote].

    How do you expect to sell your (false) narrative when everyone on the Dotard team isn't on the same page?

    LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're the one that prefers CIA cover stories for spying on political campaigns to truth, Dervy. The IA "assessment" was 100% Brennan hallucinated B.S.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just ask Adm. Mike "moderate confidence" Rogers:)

    He has all the "evidence" of the Ukrainian discovered "Russia DNC hack," after all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There was no "Ukrainian discovered DNC hack". Ukraine had absolutely nothing to do with the DNC hack. That is Russian disinformation (the hack perpetrators). The Dotard campaign wasn't spied on, they were caught colluding with Russians to steal the presidency.

    ReplyDelete
  5. lol! Says the CrowdStrike Chief Technical Officer son of the Ukrainian genius who developed the computer codes that CrowdStrike used to prove the hack was of Russian origin....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Michael Alperovitch is the coding genius, not his CTO idiot son. He's the one that knows all the back doors built into all the world's encryption... doors that HE installed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Quote: There is no missing server. ...when CrowdStrike or another firm investigates an incident, they typically don't physically remove a client's devices. Instead, they make "images" of the hard drive and memory of every relevant device so that they can preserve a sort of snapshot of the compromised systems. ... There's also nothing untoward or unusual about the DNC having turned to a private company in the first place. "There's this narrative that if the DNC had nothing to hide, then why did they bring in CrowdStrike in addition to the FBI", says Jake Williams, a former NSA hacker and founder of the security firm Rendition Infosec. "But the reality is that they're a private organization and the FBI will not help you put your systems back online. They're not going to help you recover from a breach, they're just going to investigate it".

    Why bring it up with Ukraine? ... A CrowdStrike spokesperson said Wednesday that the company is based in the US and has no specific connection to Ukraine. CrowdStrike was cofounded by its chief technology officer, Dmitri Alperovitch, who was born in Moscow and moved to America with his parents as a teenager. Some dubious reports and far-right fringe conspiracies theories have attempted to draw a connection between Alperovitch and the Ukrainian elite, but no actual evidence of those ties appears to exist. [end quote]

    There was no "Ukrainian discovered DNC hack". Ukraine had absolutely nothing to do with the DNC hack. That is Russian disinformation (the hack perpetrators).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dmitri Alperovitch is Michael Alperovitch's son. Michael defected to the USA with his family and was given a CIA fabricated cover (hence no "evidence" of a Ukrainian connection). They say that he was a nuclear physicist, but it's evident that he is an expert in mathematics and Soviet encryption and it is rumoured that he brought all the former SovietUnion's "encryption code technology" with him (hence Dmitri's/ CrowdStrikes ability to tell who the hackers are by their software code used in the hacks). Michael, Dmitri's father, is the world's foremost expert in PKI encryption technology, which is used almost universally world-wide for commercial/non-governmental encryption privacy. He has worked for many US covert contractors.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You might want to start the video at 15:25 on Russian/ Ukrainian election interference...

    ReplyDelete
  10. SO WHAT if what you write is true? It wouldn't prove anything. There was no "Ukrainian election interference". Some Ukrainians spoke out because they didn't like the fact that Dotard sided with the country that invaded them and seized some of their territory. They didn't have the right to say they didn't like that? Has Dmitri Alperovitch said anything about Crimea? I'm not aware that he has.

    Quote: “If we take Trump's words at face value, then it appears that the president of the United States is intellectually unable to distinguish between utterly outlandish conspiracy theories and solid intelligence assessments based on facts", said Thomas Rid, a Johns Hopkins security studies professor. [end quote].

    It appears that the pro-Dotard blogger who calls himself Minus FJ is intellectually unable to distinguish between utterly outlandish conspiracy theories and solid intelligence assessments based on facts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I can't watch any videos until Thursday. I'm almost out of data. btw, I'd only watch it for a laugh (if I do). Jimmy Dore is an idiot. If he really is for Bernie Sanders he should be happy. It looks like Bernie almost has it wrapped up. Although (despite what Dore says) he clearly supports Dotard. btw, I just early voted for Bernie :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. A vote in the primary for Bernie is a vote for Trump in the general! Thanks for your vote. :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. It isn't Anyway, I voted for the real populist, not the fake, Putin-backed one.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You mean that you voted for Putin's ACTUAL puppet. Traitor!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bernie is Putin's puppet. Just ask the US IC

    ReplyDelete