The antidote is even more Russian propaganda from Rudy the Putin-puppet and fake news from the Dotard boot-licking OAN? What a surprise. Not. OAN should be ORP.
LOL! Your convoluted conspiracy that has large chunks of the government, the DNC and Ukrainians involved in a "deep state" coup to take down Dotard is what Occam's Razor argues against.
Civil Servants serving their own interests is hardly a "conspiracy theory". It's a statement of the nature of every life form in the universe. It's a universal theory of life. Life forms seeks to preserve and perpetuate their continued existence. That apples to Jim Comey as it does a cockroach.
Quote: Rudy has worked as Trump's lawyer for "free", but Parnas paid him half a million dollars for his work [money that came from Dmytro Firtash]... If Parnas himself was being paid by Russian sources, this means the Russians were essentially subsidizing Trump, paying for the work themselves so he didn't have to lay out a dime of his own money. [End quote]
Putin's mayor is being paid by Putin to "gather" Russian disinformation helpful to the puppet Dotard.
Your stupidity concerning the imaginary "deep state" not being a conspiracy theory is pathetic and not even worthy of an "LOL".
Parnas is a Ukrainian trying to start a marijuana business...
Dmytro Firtash is ALSO a Ukrainian involved with Paul Manafort. Yet ALL Democrats agree that RUSSIA, and NOT Ukraine, was interfering in the US elections. Are you calling Democrats LIARS?
Turns out the DNC is the collusion king of globalism AND global politics.
Putin has puppets in Ukraine, just as he has puppets in America. The Democratic Party is fighting back against the enemy within, the republic party (the Russian collusion party). Les Parnas (an American citizen born in Ukraine) helped Putin's mayor collect Russian-manufactured misinformation. Now that he's been arrested, I've heard he wants to cooperate (flip on Rudy and Dotard). Which means he might soon be a member of the "deep state". LOL.
Who provided the Manafort "black book" that lead to a campaign manager's resignation (actual election interference). Here's a hint, it wasn't Russians colluding with a major political party to get a win for Trump. :)
Viktor Yanukovych, Manafort's employer, "is currently in exile in Russia and wanted by Ukraine for high treason". His government was pro-Russian. Anyway, providing evidence of crimes isn't "actual election interference". Also, Manafort was Putin's collusion connection. To facilitate collusion was the entire reason Manafort joined the Dotard campaign.
Re: "You've impeached a sitting president precisely for that"... No. Joe Biden has/will never be charged with a crime. Russian propaganda does not add up to criminal activity.
Re: "As for Manafort colluding with Russians/Putin... what part of the Mueller Report corroborated THAT charge?"... the part that details the 8/2/2016 meeting with Konstantin Kilimnik in the Grand Havana Room where he handed off Dotard campaign internal polling data. Data that allowed Russian to micro-target voters in key states Dotard needed to win in the Electoral college. (Mueller Report Pages 132-134, 138-141).
Polling data from August 2016 was all it took to fix the election? Who knew it could be so simple. Makes you wonder why they do polls after such definitive samples have been taken...
I suspect Manafort gave Kilimnik polling data on multiple occasions. In any case, that was only one strategy deployed to help Dotard "win". Personally I think strategy ONE (as it always is) was to disenfranchise as many voters as possible. Why Kris Kobach was a Dotard campaign advisor. The Russian cheating assist put then over top. It was a minor but vital component explaining how Dotard "won".
He got caught once. As everyone knows, criminals usually commit crimes many times without getting caught.
How much money did Congressional republics spend endlessly investigating the Clintons? How much did the multiple Benghazi and HRC email investigations (all of which cleared Hillary Clinton) cost? How much did it cost for the Dotard administration to re-investigate the HRC email situation before clearing her (again)? Give me a break.
If you said the republican Mueller and the largely republican (and pro-Dotard) FBI bungled the investigation, I couldn't say I entirely disagree. Even so, Toady Barr had to delay the report's release so his lies and spin had time to sink in. That is how damning what Mueller's investigators were able to uncover was. And why Manafort and Stone have been convicted.
Why do I need to explain? It was the Dotard administration that cleared her. BTW, the server was not "illegal". Also, a lot of the supposed "top secret" messages were reclassified as such at a later date. Meanwhile Dotard continues to use an unsecured phone that the Russians and Chinese (and others) are almost certainly listening in on. The security risk posed by Dotard (who revealed classified info to his Russian handler in the oval office) is huge. According to what I've heard, Hillary Clinton's LEGAL servier was never hacked (only the DNC servers were).
Hillary Clinton Cleared of Mishandling Classified Information. (excerpt) A major investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state found no evidence of deliberate mishandling of classified information. The finding by the U.S. State Department, released on Friday [end excerpt].
That would be Friday October 16, 2019. A date that occurred DURING the Dotard presidency. Also, it is COMMON SENSE to make sure the data contained on Hard Drives you are disposing of is destroyed. HRC followed the law which (at the time) stated that she had to turn over job related emails. Also the law said the sorting of job-related and personal emails was at her discretion. HRC followed the law/did nothing wrong. Explaining why even the Dotard administration cleared her. If there was ANYTHING they could have nailed her on -- I am POSITIVE they would have. Yet they CLEARED here. After the expense of an unnecessary 3 year re-investigation.
Accidental unauthorized disclosures of classified materials are prosecuted all the time.
While not dispositive, the following multifactor test is commonly used in determining whether an inadvertent disclosure is a waiver. the reasonableness of precautions taken, the time taken to rectify the error, the scope of discovery, the extent of disclosure, and the overriding issue of fairness.
Whether or not an inadvertent disclosure of privileged information constitutes a waiver varies amongst the courts. The majority of courts rule the inadvertent disclosure as a wavier if the disclosing party acted carelessly in disclosing the information and failed to request its return in a timely manner. Other courts rely on the theory that a disclosure must be intentional to be a waiver, while some courts hold that any inadvertent disclosure of privileged information constitutes a waiver without regard to the protections taken to avoid such a disclosure.
The US government has consistently argued that it does not have to show any of the following: 1. That the person acted with the intent to harm the United States or to aid a foreign power. 2. That the person actually believed or even had reason to believe that disclosing the information would harm the national defense. 3. That the person did not act to disclose information related to illegal activity, or information of significant public interest, i.e., that the person was not acting as a “whistle blower.” (It asserts that there is simply no First Amendment right to disclose such information.) 4. That the disclosure actually caused harm to the United States, 5. That the person acted with the intent to violate the statute, or 6. That there was a reasonable belief that the disclosure would cause harm (unless only information and no documents were transferred).
OK. Anyway, current administrations usually/almost always look the other way when it comes to such violations. Because they know they're likely to commit violations of their own. Yet (according to what I've heard) Dotard REALLY wanted to go after (and prosecute) HRC. So far... nothing. Which says to me that they can't come up with anything. In regards to HRC or BHO.
When are the oranges trials going to start? Dotard's time in office is almost up. You're sure Putin will be able to steal a second term for Dotard? Maybe the plan is to wait until Ivana Jr's second term? The trials should definitely begin before Barron's term. BHO is still relatively young but HRC might not be around any longer to prosecute. LOL!
I doubt Nancy Pelosi has any inside info regarding possible sham charges Dotard and his toady "Attorney General" Barr may wish to bring against any former Obama administration official (or when they might bring such charges). If she does I'm positive she wouldn't tell me.
Joe Biden was going to be (and still might?) be indicted? LOL. Have him and his dad Hunter called as witnesses during the Senate trial. I'd be fine with that. So long as Democrats get the witnesses they want.
The antidote is even more Russian propaganda from Rudy the Putin-puppet and fake news from the Dotard boot-licking OAN? What a surprise. Not. OAN should be ORP.
ReplyDelete"...do us a favor, though" = not complicated.
America's Mayor is colluding with Putin, too? Who knew? Certainly not Occham or his razor.
ReplyDeleteLOL! Your convoluted conspiracy that has large chunks of the government, the DNC and Ukrainians involved in a "deep state" coup to take down Dotard is what Occam's Razor argues against.
ReplyDelete"America's Mayor" = Putin's mayor.
Civil Servants serving their own interests is hardly a "conspiracy theory". It's a statement of the nature of every life form in the universe. It's a universal theory of life. Life forms seeks to preserve and perpetuate their continued existence. That apples to Jim Comey as it does a cockroach.
ReplyDeleteQuote: Rudy has worked as Trump's lawyer for "free", but Parnas paid him half a million dollars for his work [money that came from Dmytro Firtash]... If Parnas himself was being paid by Russian sources, this means the Russians were essentially subsidizing Trump, paying for the work themselves so he didn't have to lay out a dime of his own money. [End quote]
ReplyDeletePutin's mayor is being paid by Putin to "gather" Russian disinformation helpful to the puppet Dotard.
Your stupidity concerning the imaginary "deep state" not being a conspiracy theory is pathetic and not even worthy of an "LOL".
Parnas is a Ukrainian trying to start a marijuana business...
ReplyDeleteDmytro Firtash is ALSO a Ukrainian involved with Paul Manafort. Yet ALL Democrats agree that RUSSIA, and NOT Ukraine, was interfering in the US elections. Are you calling Democrats LIARS?
Turns out the DNC is the collusion king of globalism AND global politics.
Putin has puppets in Ukraine, just as he has puppets in America. The Democratic Party is fighting back against the enemy within, the republic party (the Russian collusion party). Les Parnas (an American citizen born in Ukraine) helped Putin's mayor collect Russian-manufactured misinformation. Now that he's been arrested, I've heard he wants to cooperate (flip on Rudy and Dotard). Which means he might soon be a member of the "deep state". LOL.
ReplyDeleteWho provided the Manafort "black book" that lead to a campaign manager's resignation (actual election interference). Here's a hint, it wasn't Russians colluding with a major political party to get a win for Trump. :)
ReplyDeleteViktor Yanukovych, Manafort's employer, "is currently in exile in Russia and wanted by Ukraine for high treason". His government was pro-Russian. Anyway, providing evidence of crimes isn't "actual election interference". Also, Manafort was Putin's collusion connection. To facilitate collusion was the entire reason Manafort joined the Dotard campaign.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, providing evidence of crimes isn't "actual election interference".
ReplyDeleteYou've impeached a sitting president precisely for that...
As for Manafort colluding with Russians/Putin... what part of the Mueller Report corroborated THAT charge?
oooops!
Re: "You've impeached a sitting president precisely for that"... No. Joe Biden has/will never be charged with a crime. Russian propaganda does not add up to criminal activity.
ReplyDeleteRe: "As for Manafort colluding with Russians/Putin... what part of the Mueller Report corroborated THAT charge?"... the part that details the 8/2/2016 meeting with Konstantin Kilimnik in the Grand Havana Room where he handed off Dotard campaign internal polling data. Data that allowed Russian to micro-target voters in key states Dotard needed to win in the Electoral college. (Mueller Report Pages 132-134, 138-141).
:P
ReplyDeletePolling data from August 2016 was all it took to fix the election? Who knew it could be so simple. Makes you wonder why they do polls after such definitive samples have been taken...
ReplyDeleteGet real.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI suspect Manafort gave Kilimnik polling data on multiple occasions. In any case, that was only one strategy deployed to help Dotard "win". Personally I think strategy ONE (as it always is) was to disenfranchise as many voters as possible. Why Kris Kobach was a Dotard campaign advisor. The Russian cheating assist put then over top. It was a minor but vital component explaining how Dotard "won".
ReplyDeleteYou suspect? That's all you can say after spending $40 million investigating with the FBI's best & brightest?
ReplyDeleteHe got caught once. As everyone knows, criminals usually commit crimes many times without getting caught.
ReplyDeleteHow much money did Congressional republics spend endlessly investigating the Clintons? How much did the multiple Benghazi and HRC email investigations (all of which cleared Hillary Clinton) cost? How much did it cost for the Dotard administration to re-investigate the HRC email situation before clearing her (again)? Give me a break.
If you said the republican Mueller and the largely republican (and pro-Dotard) FBI bungled the investigation, I couldn't say I entirely disagree. Even so, Toady Barr had to delay the report's release so his lies and spin had time to sink in. That is how damning what Mueller's investigators were able to uncover was. And why Manafort and Stone have been convicted.
ReplyDeleteHillary was "cleared" given all the Top Secret/Code Compartmented data on her illegal server? 'Splain how THAT happened.
ReplyDeleteWhy do I need to explain? It was the Dotard administration that cleared her. BTW, the server was not "illegal". Also, a lot of the supposed "top secret" messages were reclassified as such at a later date. Meanwhile Dotard continues to use an unsecured phone that the Russians and Chinese (and others) are almost certainly listening in on. The security risk posed by Dotard (who revealed classified info to his Russian handler in the oval office) is huge. According to what I've heard, Hillary Clinton's LEGAL servier was never hacked (only the DNC servers were).
ReplyDeletelol! Trump wasn't President when Comey cleared her. And spy satellite recon photo's are classified top secret simply because they reveal capabilities.
ReplyDeleteHillary Clinton's LEGAL servier was never hacked.
ReplyDelete...and Bleachbit ensured it was never examined, even by the "whatever results you require," totally "in the bag" DNC CrowStrike Team.
I suspect that CrowStrike hasd already exceeded it's Ukrainian foreign campaign contribution quota...
Hillary Clinton Cleared of Mishandling Classified Information. (excerpt) A major investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state found no evidence of deliberate mishandling of classified information. The finding by the U.S. State Department, released on Friday [end excerpt].
ReplyDeleteThat would be Friday October 16, 2019. A date that occurred DURING the Dotard presidency. Also, it is COMMON SENSE to make sure the data contained on Hard Drives you are disposing of is destroyed. HRC followed the law which (at the time) stated that she had to turn over job related emails. Also the law said the sorting of job-related and personal emails was at her discretion. HRC followed the law/did nothing wrong. Explaining why even the Dotard administration cleared her. If there was ANYTHING they could have nailed her on -- I am POSITIVE they would have. Yet they CLEARED here. After the expense of an unnecessary 3 year re-investigation.
Accidental unauthorized disclosures of classified materials are prosecuted all the time.
ReplyDeleteWhile not dispositive, the following multifactor test is commonly used in determining whether an inadvertent disclosure is a waiver.
the reasonableness of precautions taken,
the time taken to rectify the error,
the scope of discovery,
the extent of disclosure, and
the overriding issue of fairness.
Whether or not an inadvertent disclosure of privileged information constitutes a waiver varies amongst the courts. The majority of courts rule the inadvertent disclosure as a wavier if the disclosing party acted carelessly in disclosing the information and failed to request its return in a timely manner. Other courts rely on the theory that a disclosure must be intentional to be a waiver, while some courts hold that any inadvertent disclosure of privileged information constitutes a waiver without regard to the protections taken to avoid such a disclosure.
It simply depends upon the Court.
The US government has consistently argued that it does not have to show any of the following:
ReplyDelete1. That the person acted with the intent to harm the United States or to aid a foreign power.
2. That the person actually believed or even had reason to believe that disclosing the
information would harm the national defense.
3. That the person did not act to disclose information related to illegal activity, or
information of significant public interest, i.e., that the person was not acting as a “whistle
blower.” (It asserts that there is simply no First Amendment right to disclose such
information.)
4. That the disclosure actually caused harm to the United States,
5. That the person acted with the intent to violate the statute, or
6. That there was a reasonable belief that the disclosure would cause harm (unless only
information and no documents were transferred).
OK. Anyway, current administrations usually/almost always look the other way when it comes to such violations. Because they know they're likely to commit violations of their own. Yet (according to what I've heard) Dotard REALLY wanted to go after (and prosecute) HRC. So far... nothing. Which says to me that they can't come up with anything. In regards to HRC or BHO.
ReplyDeleteWhen are the oranges trials going to start? Dotard's time in office is almost up. You're sure Putin will be able to steal a second term for Dotard? Maybe the plan is to wait until Ivana Jr's second term? The trials should definitely begin before Barron's term. BHO is still relatively young but HRC might not be around any longer to prosecute. LOL!
ReplyDeleteWhen are the oranges trials going to start?
ReplyDeleteAsk Nancy.
I doubt Nancy Pelosi has any inside info regarding possible sham charges Dotard and his toady "Attorney General" Barr may wish to bring against any former Obama administration official (or when they might bring such charges). If she does I'm positive she wouldn't tell me.
ReplyDeleteShe isn't trying to head off future indictments through Impeachment proceedings against Trump? Who knew?
ReplyDeleteJoe Biden was going to be (and still might?) be indicted? LOL. Have him and his dad Hunter called as witnesses during the Senate trial. I'd be fine with that. So long as Democrats get the witnesses they want.
ReplyDeleteThe Democrats will still be demanding witnesses through the 2024 election.
ReplyDelete...just one more and THEN we'll finally have the evidence. BWAH!
ReplyDelete