Saturday, October 19, 2019

Oh, to be in Congress...

Congresswoman Kate Hill & Staffer
congress
[ˈkäNGɡrəs]

NOUN
1) a national legislative body, especially that of the US. The US Congress, which meets at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., was established by the Constitution of 1787 and is composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
"changes in taxation required the approval of Congress" · [more]

synonyms:
legislature · legislative assembly · parliament · convocation · diet · council · [more]
2) a formal meeting or series of meetings for discussion between delegates, especially those from a political party or labor union or from within a particular discipline.
"an international congress of mathematicians"

synonyms:
conference · convention · seminar · colloquium · symposium · consultation · [more]
3) a society or organization, especially a political one.
"the National Congress of American Indians"
4) the action of coming together.
"sexual congress"
Next time... could you please sit on a towel?

24 comments:

  1. So, you have an issue with a woman sitting naked on a couch without a towel, but none with guys who like watching women pee on mattresses?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You've got a tape? Would LOVE to see it. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. You'd "LOVE" to see the pee tape? So why criticize Kate Hill when you freely (and proudly?) admit your own perversions? BTW, if I had a copy I'd sell it to the highest bidder -- the highest bidder that planned to release it (instead of bury it) that is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I produced my picture. You produce yours. Oh, that's right you can't.... because yours are FALSE accusations. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. The pee tape won't be released so long as Dotard remains a good puppet. Something he proved recently by giving Putin exactly what he wants -- by abandoning our allies the Kurds. Dotard is a traitor to the US (gives aid and comfort to ISIS) but the pee tape remains in Putin's hands. And Dotard Tower Turkey is still making him money.

    Devin Nunes did say Democrats were/are looking for nude pictures of Dotard. I'm not sure if he meant the pee tape or some other nudes. So maybe Dotard nudes will be forthcoming at some future date. We've already seen the Melania nudes. The ones that suggest she likely violated US immigration laws.

    ReplyDelete
  6. lol! Are you sure that Putin doesn't have pictures of Bill Clinton that he's blackmailing Hillary with?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am 100 percent positive the nonsense you write is false.

    ReplyDelete
  8. So what? You think he should have promised to take orders from Putin as Dotard roes?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Selling out Uranium One wasn't Putin's orders? Hillary should return the Foundation donations....

    ReplyDelete
  10. No. Shep Smith debunked that conspiracy theory on Fox Nooz. One of the reasons he was fired, no doubt. Anyway, as Shep points out, none of the Uranium can be exported. It's mined in the US and sold to power plants in the US. So why would Putin even care?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Typo correction: "as Dotard roes" should be "as Dotard does" in my comment prior to your stupidity concerning Uranium One.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sorry, but everything not supporting the current Democrat narrative isn't a "conspiracy theory". It's proof that your ideology is distorting your vision.

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's pretty funny coming from someone who buys the laughably fake "Russia didn't hack the DNC and Dotard didn't collude with Russia" narrative. Also remember that the members of your fake "deep state" are mostly republicans. And is Shep Smith a Democrat who spins "Democrat narratives"? Proof your ideology is distorting your vision. Bigly.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm willing to out and fire deep state partisan Republicans. It's a shame you PREFER krony government. You should move to Argentina and vote Peron! Caudillos are the DNC's goal for the USA.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm not sure what "krony government" is. If you mean "crony", then I oppose it. Strongly. FYI, "cronyism" is "the appointment of friends and associates to positions of authority, without proper regard to their qualifications" -- and Dotard's appointment of his daughter and her husband certainly qualifies. Yet you seemingly approve. Are you going to move to Argentina and vote Peron?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Given that the deep state was actively spying on and undermining the president-elect I can totally understand why Trump couldn't entrust positions of authority to traditional corporate "revolving door" civil sevants. Obama had weaponized DOJ, CIA, IRS, State, and many other important aagencies.

    ReplyDelete
  17. If there were such a thing as this "deep state", one of them would have leaked that Dotard was under investigation for being a Russian asset, damaging his campaign and quite likely sinking it. Instead Comey sabotages HRC with a last minute "re-opening" of the bogus investigation into her emails.

    FYI, no agencies were weaponized under Obama. You're thinking of Dotard. He has the supposed Attorney General running around "investigating" the oranges conspiracy theory while he demands collusion from the leaders of multiple countries.

    republics win by cheating. Dotard upped the usual republic cheating game by combining voter suppression/disenfranchisement with collusion/being a traitor. He should be tried, found guilty and sent to Gitmo for the rest of his miserable life. To be safe I think we should at least consider execution (wouldn't want a future president to pardon him). Additionally his assets should be seized as proceeds from a criminal enterprise.

    ReplyDelete
  18. one of them would have leaked that Dotard was under investigation for being a Russian asset, damaging his campaign and quite likely sinking it.

    What was the Steele dossier? Chopped liver?

    ReplyDelete
  19. The public was largely unaware of it until after the election...

    October 31, 2016: ...a week before the election, Mother Jones reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI. The article disclosed some of the dossier's allegations...

    January 10, 2017: CNN reports that intelligence officials briefed Trump on a dossier that contains allegations about his campaign's ties to Russia as well as salacious rumors about him. The author of the dossier is a former British spy who was hired by a research firm that had been funded by both political parties to conduct opposition research on Trump.

    The Media was focused on HRC's emails for the ENTIRE election. The dossier stuff wasn't revealed until a week before the election and did not really become widely known until after Dotard was "elected".

    ReplyDelete
  20. The dossier itself wasn't published until AFTER the election.

    Quote: The dossier was published in full by BuzzFeed on January 10, 2017.

    You think a document that was published in 2017 somehow had an effect on an election that took place in 2016??

    ReplyDelete
  21. Steele wasn't leaking to the press like a sieve before the election Isakoff's Sept 23, 2016 article)? Who knew?

    ReplyDelete
  22. How else could the FBI have Steele tidbits cited press reports in their FISA applications for Carter Paige, et al in the summer of 2016?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why would they cite anything that was in the press instead of the actual dossier? Anyway -- like I already said -- this story didn't really break wide open until after the election. If this was "deep state" sabotage as you say, why the f*ck did the FBI do a much more timely job sabotaging Hillary? Why sabotage Hillary at all? Did they think they could get Jill Stein elected?

    ReplyDelete