The claim that “Covid mRNA isn’t a vaccine, it’s gene therapy” is inaccurate. mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are vaccines, not gene therapy. They work by teaching cells to make a harmless piece of the virus’s spike protein, which trains the immune system to recognize and fight the virus. They do not alter DNA or permanently change genes.
⚡ Why mRNA Vaccines Are Vaccines.
Definition of a vaccine: A preparation that stimulates the immune system to produce protection against disease.
mRNA mechanism: Delivers messenger RNA into cells, which instructs them to produce a viral protein fragment. The immune system then learns to recognize and attack the real virus.
No DNA alteration: The mRNA stays in the cytoplasm and is broken down quickly. It does not enter the cell nucleus or integrate into the genome.
✨ Why It’s Not Gene Therapy.
Gene therapy definition: Involves deliberately altering or replacing a person’s genes to treat a genetic disorder.
mRNA vaccines: Do not modify genes, DNA, or hereditary material. They only provide temporary instructions for protein production.
Expert consensus: Multiple fact‑checks and scientific reviews confirm that calling mRNA vaccines “gene therapy” is misleading.
🌒 Why the Confusion Exists.
The use of genetic material (RNA) leads some to conflate vaccines with gene therapy.
Misinterpretations are amplified by blogs, social media, and commentators who frame mRNA vaccines as experimental or misclassified.
In reality, mRNA vaccines are a new *type* of vaccine technology, but they still meet the definition of a vaccine.
✅ Bottom line: The blog’s summary is **not scientifically accurate**. COVID‑19 mRNA vaccines are vaccines, not gene therapy. They train the immune system without altering DNA. 🛑
Two “Disgusting. Democrat Senators John Hickenlooper and Jack Reed say the shutdown "was difinaty Worth it"— that put our most vulnerable at risk and deprived Americans of their paychecks and benefits for weeks — was ‘worth it,'” Research pointed out, sharing a clip of both senators concluding that the longest shutdown in U.S. history was, indeed, worth it, yeah, it was worth it, “definitely.”
Biden knows the Democrat Party is collapsing. Thanks Joe, you made this possible. Every time he gets inappropriately emotional, it reminds me of when he went NUTS with those RED curtains behind him a two Marines Armed on each side of him while he was Waving, and Slamming his fists in anger.
Minus: The lies of oficialism. Go get a Covid Booster Derv. Stay current!
LOL! donald trump believes the "lies of oficialism"? I thought he was in office to shatter the lies?
🤖 Via Copilot...
Donald Trump’s physician has confirmed that he received updated COVID‑19 booster shots (alongside flu shots) during scheduled medical checkups at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in October 2025. These updates were shared in official memos released by the White House...
📜 What’s Known.
October 10, 2025: Trump’s physician, Capt. Sean P. Barbabella, announced that Trump received both a COVID‑19 booster and a flu shot as part of a routine health evaluation at Walter Reed.
Public disclosure: The White House released a memo summarizing the visit, noting that Trump “remains in exceptional health” and that the immunizations were part of his preventive care.
Media coverage: Outlets like *USA Today*, *NBC News*, and *Times Now Health* reported on the shots, confirming that this information was made public. ...🛑
Re: "The claim that “Covid mRNA isn’t a vaccine, it’s gene therapy” is inaccurate. mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are vaccines, not gene therapy."
That's classic official propaganda/lies!
These "vaccines" are not health-promoting agents but health-destroying poisons/bioweapons that have killed MILLIONS OF PEOPLE globally, and it's still ongoing --- www.CovidTruthBeKnown.com or https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html (The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”)
"I kept an extensive record of sudden deaths of mRNA vaccinated doctors during 2021-2023, after COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines were forced via mandates. The data showed a SKYROCKETING MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OF DOCTORS following injection with mRNA products. I stopped keeping track as it became clear that for the medical and political establishments, THESE SUDDEN DEATHS WERE DEEMED "ACCEPTABLE" TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE. And doctors themselves, stayed silent." --- William Makis, M.D., September 2025 (https://archive.is/R9G0j)
"The term ‘mRNA vaccine’ is a cover for nanotechnologies that are being used as gene-editing technologies and agents of biowarfare on US and global citizens. The cationic liposome nanotechnologies are being used to introduce non-human DNA into the cells of adults and children to turn their cells into disease-causing, toxic spike-protein bioweapon factories." --- Karen Kingston, former Big Pharma employee, in 2023 (https://archive.md/GTmQ1)
"There are essentially no usable, relevant and unbiased policy-grade clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, and COVID-19 vaccine efficacy has never been reliably demonstrated in observational or ecological studies free of design bias." --- Denis G. Rancourt, Ph.D., Independent Research Scientist on Covid-19 "Vaccines" in 2025 (https://archive.ph/uWpzR)
"Despite the extensive documentation, most mainstream doctors and media dangerously continue to ignore my findings and refuse to speak about the self assembly nanotechnology that is in every human being now. The blood contamination is greatly accelerating in the amount of nanotechnology seen due to C19 bioweapon shedding, geoengineering and food contamination, to name a few sources." ---Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D., Ph.D., Oct 2023 (https://archive.ph/GbMtm)
If you have been injected with Covid jabs/bioweapons and are concerned, then verify what batch number you were injected with at https://howbadismybatch.com
"There are large numbers of scientists, doctors, and presstitutes who will sell out truth for money, such as those who describe people dropping dead on a daily basis as “rare” when it it happening all over the vaccinated world." --- Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., American economist & former US regime official, in 2024
"This is why they have to make yard signs that say “Science is Real”. Because this new science ISN'T. It is a total in-your-stupid-face conjob. When something is real and people know that, you don't have to make yard signs promoting it. You don't need yard signs saying “trees are real”, “the sky is blue”. You only need yard signs promoting things that AREN'T real. Like new science and, say, political candidates." --- Miles Mathis, American author
Update: Minus has conceded that his blog post statement, "Covid nRNA isn't a Vaccine. It's Gene Therapy" is incorrect. I therefore expect this post to be corrected and the error to be noted. If Minus has any integrity, that is.
I actually need to get on some drugs. I am currently on no drugs.
But this non sequitur has nothing to do with the fact that you clearly admitted being wrong. Is it your moronic argument that mRNA vaccines do not effect genes but are somehow gene therapy anyway?
The RNA genetic code is a set of rules that defines how the sequence of nucleotides in an RNA molecule is translated into a sequence of amino acids to build proteins. This code uses codons, which are three-nucleotide sequences on messenger RNA (mRNA), to specify each amino acid or a stop signal for translation. It is universal across almost all life forms, and the process involves transcription (DNA to mRNA) and translation (mRNA to protein).
COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved rapidly in response to the urgency created by the pandemic. No specific regulations existed at the time they were marketed. The regulatory agencies therefore adapted them as a matter of urgency. Now that the pandemic emergency has passed, it is time to consider the safety issues associated with this rapid approval. The mode of action of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines should classify them as gene therapy products (GTPs), but they have been excluded by regulatory agencies. Some of the tests they have undergone as vaccines have produced non-compliant results in terms of purity, quality and batch homogeneity. The wide and persistent biodistribution of mRNAs and their protein products, incompletely studied due to their classification as vaccines, raises safety issues. Post-marketing studies have shown that mRNA passes into breast milk and could have adverse effects on breast-fed babies. Long-term expression, integration into the genome, transmission to the germline, passage into sperm, embryo/fetal and perinatal toxicity, genotoxicity and tumorigenicity should be studied in light of the adverse events reported in pharmacovigilance databases. The potential horizontal transmission (i.e., shedding) should also have been assessed. In-depth vaccinovigilance should be carried out. We would expect these controls to be required for future mRNA vaccines developed outside the context of a pandemic.
The link you shared is to PubMed Central (PMC), which is hosted by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the NIH.
PMC is a repository of published scientific articles. It carries a government banner because the site itself is an NIH service.
Important distinction: The articles in PMC are not NIH statements. They are papers written by independent researchers, deposited there for open access.
📃 The specific article.
The text you quoted comes from a paper by Hélène Banoun, titled “mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues”, published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences in 2023.
Banoun is a French researcher, not an NIH employee.
Because PMC archives peer-reviewed journal content, her article appears ther -- but that doesn’t mean NIH endorses it.
⚖️ NIH’s actual position.
NIH/NIAID materials consistently describe mRNA COVID-19 products as vaccines, not gene therapies.
Their educational pages emphasize that mRNA vaccines deliver instructions to make a viral protein, do not alter DNA, and are regulated as vaccines.
NIH has funded research into mRNA platforms, but it does not classify them as gene therapy.
💩 Why bloggers exploit this.
By linking to PMC, they can say “this is on the NIH site,” which is technically true in the sense of hosting, but misleading in terms of authorship.
It’s a rhetorical move: borrowing the NIH banner to give weight to a viewpoint that NIH itself does not hold.
✅ Bottom line.
The page is indeed on an NIH-hosted site (PMC), but the content is Banoun’s article, not an NIH statement. NIH provides the infrastructure; the author provides the claims. The blogger is blurring that line to make it sound like NIH itself is saying mRNA vaccines are gene therapy, which is not the case. 🛑
🤖 This is a classic rhetorical move: reframing regulatory language as a kind of conspiracy or semantic trick. Let’s break it down carefully.
▶️ 1. What “Operation Warp Speed” actually was.
Operation Warp Speed (OWS) was a U.S. government program launched in 2020 to accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID‑19 vaccines and therapeutics.
Its goal was speed through parallelization: funding manufacturing while trials were still ongoing, streamlining logistics, and coordinating agencies.
It did not involve redefining gene therapy products (GTPs). Regulators continued to classify mRNA vaccines as vaccines under biologics law.
▶️ 2. Why mRNA vaccines are called vaccines
Mechanism: They deliver mRNA instructions to cells to produce a viral protein (spike), which trains the immune system.
Purpose: The intent is immunization against infection, not correction of genetic defects.
Regulatory precedent.
Nucleic acid–based vaccines (DNA, RNA) were already being researched for decades. The FDA and EMA classify them as vaccines because their function is immunization, not gene modification.
▶️ 3. The “gene therapy” framing.
Critics like Banoun argue that because mRNA involves genetic material, it should fall under gene therapy regulations.
Regulators disagree: gene therapy implies altering or replacing genes, often with vectors designed for integration. mRNA vaccines do not do this.
So the “re-definition” claim is misleading -- it’s not that regulators changed definitions, but that critics are applying a different lens.
▶️ 4. The rhetorical strategy.
Saying “they just called them vaccines to avoid precautions” implies intentional deception.
In reality, regulators applied vaccine frameworks because the products fit the vaccine definition.
Safety precautions were not skipped: EUA required large Phase 3 trials, and post‑marketing surveillance continues. Known risks (like myocarditis) were added to labeling.
▶️ 5. How to read this critically.
Check the source: If it’s on PubMed Central, it’s a journal article archived by NIH, not an NIH statement.
Separate hosting from endorsement: NIH hosts thousands of papers, including critical ones, but doesn’t endorse their conclusions.
Watch for semantic reframing: “Gene therapy” vs “vaccine” is a definitional debate, not evidence of regulatory misconduct.
✅ Bottom line: The follow‑up comment reframes vaccine classification as a deliberate dodge, but that’s rhetoric, not fact. Regulators classify mRNA COVID‑19 products as vaccines because they function as vaccines. Operation Warp Speed accelerated timelines but did not redefine gene therapy. 🛑
If what she had said was untrue, wouldn't the paper have been retracted and classified as misinformation? NIH distributes misinformation? Was was all that censorship of Lab outbreaks about then? LOL!
22 comments:
🤖 Via Copilot...
The claim that “Covid mRNA isn’t a vaccine, it’s gene therapy” is inaccurate. mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are vaccines, not gene therapy. They work by teaching cells to make a harmless piece of the virus’s spike protein, which trains the immune system to recognize and fight the virus. They do not alter DNA or permanently change genes.
⚡ Why mRNA Vaccines Are Vaccines.
Definition of a vaccine: A preparation that stimulates the immune system to produce protection against disease.
mRNA mechanism: Delivers messenger RNA into cells, which instructs them to produce a viral protein fragment. The immune system then learns to recognize and attack the real virus.
No DNA alteration: The mRNA stays in the cytoplasm and is broken down quickly. It does not enter the cell nucleus or integrate into the genome.
✨ Why It’s Not Gene Therapy.
Gene therapy definition: Involves deliberately altering or replacing a person’s genes to treat a genetic disorder.
mRNA vaccines: Do not modify genes, DNA, or hereditary material. They only provide temporary instructions for protein production.
Expert consensus: Multiple fact‑checks and scientific reviews confirm that calling mRNA vaccines “gene therapy” is misleading.
🌒 Why the Confusion Exists.
The use of genetic material (RNA) leads some to conflate vaccines with gene therapy.
Misinterpretations are amplified by blogs, social media, and commentators who frame mRNA vaccines as experimental or misclassified.
In reality, mRNA vaccines are a new *type* of vaccine technology, but they still meet the definition of a vaccine.
✅ Bottom line: The blog’s summary is **not scientifically accurate**. COVID‑19 mRNA vaccines are vaccines, not gene therapy. They train the immune system without altering DNA. 🛑
Two “Disgusting. Democrat Senators John Hickenlooper and Jack Reed say the shutdown "was difinaty Worth it"— that put our most vulnerable at risk and deprived Americans of their paychecks and benefits for weeks — was ‘worth it,'” Research pointed out, sharing a clip of both senators concluding that the longest shutdown in U.S. history was, indeed, worth it, yeah, it was worth it, “definitely.”
The lies of oficialism. Go get a Covid Booster Derv. Stay current!
LMAO!... And yet you continue to believe the official lies of the tRump regime.
Biden knows the Democrat Party is collapsing. Thanks Joe, you
made this possible.
Every time he gets inappropriately emotional, it reminds me of when he went NUTS with those RED curtains behind him a two Marines Armed on each side of him while he was Waving, and Slamming his fists in anger.
Minus: The lies of oficialism. Go get a Covid Booster Derv. Stay current!
LOL! donald trump believes the "lies of oficialism"? I thought he was in office to shatter the lies?
🤖 Via Copilot...
Donald Trump’s physician has confirmed that he received updated COVID‑19 booster shots (alongside flu shots) during scheduled medical checkups at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in October 2025. These updates were shared in official memos released by the White House...
📜 What’s Known.
October 10, 2025: Trump’s physician, Capt. Sean P. Barbabella, announced that Trump received both a COVID‑19 booster and a flu shot as part of a routine health evaluation at Walter Reed.
Public disclosure: The White House released a memo summarizing the visit, noting that Trump “remains in exceptional health” and that the immunizations were part of his preventive care.
Media coverage: Outlets like *USA Today*, *NBC News*, and *Times Now Health* reported on the shots, confirming that this information was made public. ...🛑
Re: "The claim that “Covid mRNA isn’t a vaccine, it’s gene therapy” is inaccurate. mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are vaccines, not gene therapy."
That's classic official propaganda/lies!
These "vaccines" are not health-promoting agents but health-destroying poisons/bioweapons that have killed MILLIONS OF PEOPLE globally, and it's still ongoing --- www.CovidTruthBeKnown.com or https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html (The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”)
"I kept an extensive record of sudden deaths of mRNA vaccinated doctors during 2021-2023, after COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines were forced via mandates. The data showed a SKYROCKETING MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OF DOCTORS following injection with mRNA products. I stopped keeping track as it became clear that for the medical and political establishments, THESE SUDDEN DEATHS WERE DEEMED "ACCEPTABLE" TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE. And doctors themselves, stayed silent." --- William Makis, M.D., September 2025 (https://archive.is/R9G0j)
"The term ‘mRNA vaccine’ is a cover for nanotechnologies that are being used as gene-editing technologies and agents of biowarfare on US and global citizens. The cationic liposome nanotechnologies are being used to introduce non-human DNA into the cells of adults and children to turn their cells into disease-causing, toxic spike-protein bioweapon factories." --- Karen Kingston, former Big Pharma employee, in 2023 (https://archive.md/GTmQ1)
"There are essentially no usable, relevant and unbiased policy-grade clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, and COVID-19 vaccine efficacy has never been reliably demonstrated in observational or ecological studies free of design bias." --- Denis G. Rancourt, Ph.D., Independent Research Scientist on Covid-19 "Vaccines" in 2025 (https://archive.ph/uWpzR)
"Despite the extensive documentation, most mainstream doctors and media dangerously continue to ignore my findings and refuse to speak about the self assembly nanotechnology that is in every human being now. The blood contamination is greatly accelerating in the amount of nanotechnology seen due to C19 bioweapon shedding, geoengineering and food contamination, to name a few sources." ---Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D., Ph.D., Oct 2023 (https://archive.ph/GbMtm)
If you have been injected with Covid jabs/bioweapons and are concerned, then verify what batch number you were injected with at https://howbadismybatch.com
"There are large numbers of scientists, doctors, and presstitutes who will sell out truth for money, such as those who describe people dropping dead on a daily basis as “rare” when it it happening all over the vaccinated world." --- Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., American economist & former US regime official, in 2024
"This is why they have to make yard signs that say “Science is Real”. Because this new science ISN'T. It is a total in-your-stupid-face conjob. When something is real and people know that, you don't have to make yard signs promoting it. You don't need yard signs saying “trees are real”, “the sky is blue”. You only need yard signs promoting things that AREN'T real. Like new science and, say, political candidates." --- Miles Mathis, American author
Well that makes the 4th Trump assassination attempt. I wonder what foreign government Trump's doctor was paid by...
Probably American!
^^Winner Winner, chicken dinner^^
When is Capt. Sean P. Barbabella going to be arrested and charged with this alleged "assassination attempt"?
"That's classic official propaganda/lies!"
qtard bullplop 🤥💩
The change (of the definition of a vaccine0 was part of a larger effort to use clear, consistent public health messaging
Maybe they should change the definition of "assassination" in the interest of more effective "messaging"...?
Oh wait, isn't propaganda just "messaging"?
Update: Minus has conceded that his blog post statement, "Covid nRNA isn't a Vaccine. It's Gene Therapy" is incorrect. I therefore expect this post to be corrected and the error to be noted. If Minus has any integrity, that is.
Stay off the drugs, Derv!
I actually need to get on some drugs. I am currently on no drugs.
But this non sequitur has nothing to do with the fact that you clearly admitted being wrong. Is it your moronic argument that mRNA vaccines do not effect genes but are somehow gene therapy anyway?
RNA isn't genetic? Who knew?
Google AI:
The RNA genetic code is a set of rules that defines how the sequence of nucleotides in an RNA molecule is translated into a sequence of amino acids to build proteins. This code uses codons, which are three-nucleotide sequences on messenger RNA (mRNA), to specify each amino acid or a stop signal for translation. It is universal across almost all life forms, and the process involves transcription (DNA to mRNA) and translation (mRNA to protein).
from NIH
COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved rapidly in response to the urgency created by the pandemic. No specific regulations existed at the time they were marketed. The regulatory agencies therefore adapted them as a matter of urgency. Now that the pandemic emergency has passed, it is time to consider the safety issues associated with this rapid approval. The mode of action of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines should classify them as gene therapy products (GTPs), but they have been excluded by regulatory agencies. Some of the tests they have undergone as vaccines have produced non-compliant results in terms of purity, quality and batch homogeneity. The wide and persistent biodistribution of mRNAs and their protein products, incompletely studied due to their classification as vaccines, raises safety issues. Post-marketing studies have shown that mRNA passes into breast milk and could have adverse effects on breast-fed babies. Long-term expression, integration into the genome, transmission to the germline, passage into sperm, embryo/fetal and perinatal toxicity, genotoxicity and tumorigenicity should be studied in light of the adverse events reported in pharmacovigilance databases. The potential horizontal transmission (i.e., shedding) should also have been assessed. In-depth vaccinovigilance should be carried out. We would expect these controls to be required for future mRNA vaccines developed outside the context of a pandemic.
And yeah, they called them "vaccines" just to avoid the necessary precautions... operation warp-speed (aka re-definition of GTPs to vaccines)
🤖 Via Copilot.
The link you shared is to PubMed Central (PMC), which is hosted by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the NIH.
PMC is a repository of published scientific articles. It carries a government banner because the site itself is an NIH service.
Important distinction: The articles in PMC are not NIH statements. They are papers written by independent researchers, deposited there for open access.
📃 The specific article.
The text you quoted comes from a paper by Hélène Banoun, titled “mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues”, published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences in 2023.
Banoun is a French researcher, not an NIH employee.
Because PMC archives peer-reviewed journal content, her article appears ther -- but that doesn’t mean NIH endorses it.
⚖️ NIH’s actual position.
NIH/NIAID materials consistently describe mRNA COVID-19 products as vaccines, not gene therapies.
Their educational pages emphasize that mRNA vaccines deliver instructions to make a viral protein, do not alter DNA, and are regulated as vaccines.
NIH has funded research into mRNA platforms, but it does not classify them as gene therapy.
💩 Why bloggers exploit this.
By linking to PMC, they can say “this is on the NIH site,” which is technically true in the sense of hosting, but misleading in terms of authorship.
It’s a rhetorical move: borrowing the NIH banner to give weight to a viewpoint that NIH itself does not hold.
✅ Bottom line.
The page is indeed on an NIH-hosted site (PMC), but the content is Banoun’s article, not an NIH statement. NIH provides the infrastructure; the author provides the claims. The blogger is blurring that line to make it sound like NIH itself is saying mRNA vaccines are gene therapy, which is not the case. 🛑
🤖 This is a classic rhetorical move: reframing regulatory language as a kind of conspiracy or semantic trick. Let’s break it down carefully.
▶️ 1. What “Operation Warp Speed” actually was.
Operation Warp Speed (OWS) was a U.S. government program launched in 2020 to accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID‑19 vaccines and therapeutics.
Its goal was speed through parallelization: funding manufacturing while trials were still ongoing, streamlining logistics, and coordinating agencies.
It did not involve redefining gene therapy products (GTPs). Regulators continued to classify mRNA vaccines as vaccines under biologics law.
▶️ 2. Why mRNA vaccines are called vaccines
Mechanism: They deliver mRNA instructions to cells to produce a viral protein (spike), which trains the immune system.
Purpose: The intent is immunization against infection, not correction of genetic defects.
Regulatory precedent.
Nucleic acid–based vaccines (DNA, RNA) were already being researched for decades. The FDA and EMA classify them as vaccines because their function is immunization, not gene modification.
▶️ 3. The “gene therapy” framing.
Critics like Banoun argue that because mRNA involves genetic material, it should fall under gene therapy regulations.
Regulators disagree: gene therapy implies altering or replacing genes, often with vectors designed for integration. mRNA vaccines do not do this.
So the “re-definition” claim is misleading -- it’s not that regulators changed definitions, but that critics are applying a different lens.
▶️ 4. The rhetorical strategy.
Saying “they just called them vaccines to avoid precautions” implies intentional deception.
In reality, regulators applied vaccine frameworks because the products fit the vaccine definition.
Safety precautions were not skipped: EUA required large Phase 3 trials, and post‑marketing surveillance continues. Known risks (like myocarditis) were added to labeling.
▶️ 5. How to read this critically.
Check the source: If it’s on PubMed Central, it’s a journal article archived by NIH, not an NIH statement.
Separate hosting from endorsement: NIH hosts thousands of papers, including critical ones, but doesn’t endorse their conclusions.
Watch for semantic reframing: “Gene therapy” vs “vaccine” is a definitional debate, not evidence of regulatory misconduct.
✅ Bottom line: The follow‑up comment reframes vaccine classification as a deliberate dodge, but that’s rhetoric, not fact. Regulators classify mRNA COVID‑19 products as vaccines because they function as vaccines. Operation Warp Speed accelerated timelines but did not redefine gene therapy. 🛑
If what she had said was untrue, wouldn't the paper have been retracted and classified as misinformation? NIH distributes misinformation? Was was all that censorship of Lab outbreaks about then? LOL!
Post a Comment