Rapist tRump found guilty. Has to pay his victim 5 million. Guilt determined by court of law. Though hypocrite Qtard will likely come up with reason it doesn't count.
If you don't care, why don't you go away? No "primal scream" demanding you go away, just confusion re why you involve yourself in discussions about American politics if you don't care. Why not instead read and comment on some Trekkie fanboy board?
\\why you involve yourself in discussions about American politics if you don't care.
And we discussion American politics??? WHERE???!!!! :-))))))))))))
From MY POV(point of view) it do not look like that. AT ALL. ;-P
Well... to that last snark -- I'm lifetime learner. ;-P So, that would mean only -- that there is nothing to learn from. Some grabage of a thought non-process. ;-P
\\Why not instead read and comment on some Trekkie fanboy board?
And why should I??? That is YOUR interests.
\\Qtard will never read my blog. To fearful that he might learn something.
Because there's nothing to comment? Or there is no anonimous comments allowed. Don't remember.
But... do you really want ME in your blog??? :-)))))))))))))) Doubt it. Very much. :-))))))))))))
Because the topics of discussion here are of no interest to you. Proven with comments like, "I don't care", "Not my problem" and "whos zat?". Also because you desire not to be involved. What I don't understand is why you continue to punish yourself by reading and commenting on a blog where the topics being discussed don't interest you.
Qtard: And we discussion American politics??? WHERE? ... From MY POV it do not look like that. AT ALL.
Your POV is that of a FM.
Qtard: I'm lifetime learner.
You are uninterested and incapable of learning. Uninterested by your own admission.
Qtard: Some grabage of a thought non-process.
"Garbage thought non-process" describes how Qtard's brain functions.
Qtard: "Why not instead read and comment on some Trekkie fanboy board?"... And why should I? That is YOUR interests.
You are the one who calls himself "Q" (after the Star Trek character). I have seen some of the movies and some of the television episodes. Qtard, on the other hand, is a bigly Trekkie fanboy. As CONFIRMED by his many denials. Because (as per qtarded logic) when you deny something that confirms you are guilty of it.
Qtard: I would be banned in a jiffy of time.
You've banned yourself by refusing to create a Blogger account. It's easy to do.
Minus: I'm sure he could fashion a parody blog fashioned about you as he does all his heroes. The section dedicated to me is quite extensive.
I have zero parody blogs dedicated to any of my heroes. If Minus is implying he is a "hero" of mine he is mistaken.
\\Because the topics of discussion here are of no interest to you.
Your *framing* of it. Not discussions itself. Yawn. ;-P
\\Also because you desire not to be involved.
I am NOT. In the first place. Yawn.
But you keep that strawmaning attacks.
Continue-continue. :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Show that you are totqalitarian... wannnabe.
\\What I don't understand is why you continue to punish yourself by reading and commenting on a blog where the topics being discussed don't interest you.
Really. Why you continue coming to a place where they call you idiot? Rightefully. :-)))))))))))))))
Masohism? ;-P
Or... that is just that natural trait of narcissist showing?
\\Your POV is that of a FM.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And that is ALL what you can say?
Yeah, of course. Cause you are damn hilarious r.b. ;-P
\\You are uninterested and incapable of learning. Uninterested by your own admission.
It's impossible to be interested in missives of obvious idiocy. Cause... they are too damn predictable. NO news. That's why I am not. ;-P
\\"Garbage thought non-process" describes how Qtard's brain functions.
Sentence generated by brain that blatantly incapable of producing ANY own original thought... that's why it reusing and trying to throw back words of opponents.
That is -- hilarious. :-))))))))))))
While obvious idiocy is stupid and uninterested. Per se.
The veriety of how that idiocy manififestates... is like of that trilobites. Facinating, just fascinating. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\You are the one who calls himself "Q" (after the Star Trek character).
Yes? Or that is just YOU who assumed it? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))) And revealed itself being that Demn trekkie. ;-P And your denial of it... just priceless. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\ As CONFIRMED by his many denials. Because (as per qtarded logic) when you deny something that confirms you are guilty of it.
Aha... and you can support that "confirmed" with CORRECT quotes???
Naaaaah. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And your denial of it -- that claims need to be proved with FACTUAL quotes -- showing that you are proven guilty. Being blatantly militant religiously biggoted idiot. ;-P
Qtard: Your *framing* of it. Not discussions itself. Yawn.
Self-contradictory denial. Claim to be interested, then declare disinterest with a "yawn".
Qtard: I am NOT. In the first place. Yawn.
Many Qtard comments prove otherwise.
Qtard: But you keep that strawmaning attacks.
Impossible. I cannot "keep" doing something I have never done.
Qtard: Why you continue coming to a place where they call you idiot?
Why does Qtard come to a place where he is rightfully called an idiot? I am defending my human rights. I won't be driven away by Qtard's primal screams of "idiot!!".
Qtard: It's impossible to be interested in missives of obvious idiocy. ... That's why I am not.
LOL! Non-interest explains your many lengthy replies? And demands for replies? ("where are you?", etc).
Qtard: ...revealed itself being that Demn trekkie. And your denial of it... just priceless.
Qtard's denial proves he is a Trekkie. And embarrassed I guessed correctly why he calls himself "Q".
Qtard: ...you can support that "confirmed" with CORRECT quotes???
Where are your correct quotes confirming I am a "religious bonker", asshole? Why do I need correct quotes and Qtard does not?
Qtard: ...claims need to be proved with FACTUAL quotes.
Unless it is Qtard making the claim. Then he can just pull accusations out of his ass. Because Qtard is a huge hypocrite.
\\Self-contradictory denial. Claim to be interested, then declare disinterest with a "yawn".
For an idiot? Yes.
I like to eat fish, but do not like to catch it. Or. I like to catch fish, but it tastes... yak. ;-P
Self-contradictory??? Yeah :-))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: I am NOT. In the first place. Yawn.
\\Many Qtard comments prove otherwise.
Yap. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
Only.
You neither able to confirm it with quotes nor give some plausibly logical explanation -- why so?
Bu never the less... because you... who are you??? actually, for that that you basless moronic blurts would/could/should be regarded as Truth... without ANY confirmation???!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Impossible. I cannot "keep" doing something I have never done.
Self-contradictory denial, no? ;-P
\\Why does Qtard come to a place where he is rightfully called an idiot? I am defending my human rights. I won't be driven away by Qtard's primal screams of "idiot!!".
Of course. Cause you are idiot. YET ONE demonstartive confirmation of you being idiot -- idiots, do not understand that they are idiots. ;-P Have not that much brains. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\LOL! Non-interest explains your many lengthy replies? And demands for replies? ("where are you?", etc).
I stated many times. Openly and truthfully. That your missive -- do not interest me.
But your behavior -- is. ;-P
\\Qtard's denial proves he is a Trekkie. And embarrassed I guessed correctly why he calls himself "Q".
Defrinitely. Trekkie in denial. Idotic one to boot. Who dunno that there can be some other meanings of Q.
Cause... how else he'd know that being trekkie -- is emberrassing? Surely, some foreigner would not know.
Like. Capital latter from English alphabet, for example.
And that makes me "Alphabettian in denial", of course. ROFLing :-))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Where are your correct quotes confirming I am a "religious bonker", asshole? Why do I need correct quotes and Qtard does not?
I gave it to you.
Many times.
That link where you say "I believe in facts" -- that is definite trait of religious bonkerism. ;-P To believe in something that do not need to be -- that is damn crackpot idea. ;-P
But... you KEEP confirming that... each time... when you ignore MY correct quotes.
Like this time.
Now.
You have few choices.
Either.
You'd dismiss you false religious faith "I believe in facts". ;-P
Or... you'd continue being u.u.r.b.
Choice is yours. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But I know what you'd chose -- cause you are u.u.r.b.
Fake comments from "Mystere"? I don't see this "Mystere" guy here, Dervish. I see 2 comments above with your avatar and one with your name but no avatar, Dervitard bin $atan-$ander$.
Hey Q! You're right about Dervitard's hate blogs. He's fixated on slandering people he hates and spewing libel as long as he can get away with it without getting sued by his targets. Dervitard is also fixated on Donald Trump's private parts, as seen on his hate sites. Dervitard fantasizes about having brokeback moments with his gods Putin and the Biden Crime Family. He wants to shower in a locker room with his gods aka the Biden Crime Family, as seen on his hate blog sites. Dervitard blushes and wants us to go away, because we keep exposing his dirty fantasies for the sick deranged things they really are.
Dervitard bin-$atan-$ander$' hate blogs are his Moonbat Hall Of Shame sites. Dervitard's blog stalking on his vulgar hate site Whoz Yo Mama shows only a small slice of his mental illness. His fixation on stalking those he hates and his doxxing on his hate sites barely scratches the surface of his mental derangement. The authorities in Paris Tennessee will capture him one day when he least expects it to happen to him.
Posting people's addresses, phone numbers and other personal information such as Social Security Numbers and Driver License numbers or license plate numbers from trucks or cars registered to those you hate isn't very bright, Dervitard bin-$atan-$anders.
Qtard: "Many Qtard comments prove otherwise"... Yap. Only. You neither able to confirm it with quotes nor give some plausibly logical explanation -- why so?
I AM able to confirm it with a logical explanation. I already gave it. By "many" I meant high quantity. There are many Qtard comments. Anyone who isn't blind can see this.
Qtard: Self-contradictory denial, no?
No. That I can't "keep" doing something I have never done is a statement of fact. Understandable that a fact-challenged FM like you would have difficulty understanding.
Qtard: Where are your correct quotes confirming I am a religious bonker"... I gave it to you. Many times.
You did not. Saying that say "I believe in facts" is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism". It is a trait of an intelligent person. Many people (Qtard for example) do not believe in facts. They disbelieve them.
Qtard: But... you KEEP confirming that... each time... when you ignore MY correct quotes.
"each time" is no times. Because there no "correct quotes" that prove religious "bonkerism". Only quotes that disprove this.
Fugly Mystere: Fake comments from "Mystere"? I don't see this "Mystere" guy here, Dervish.
YOU are Mystere. Mystere is your Blogger account. I don't pretend that people who use multiple IDs are multiple people.
🔺😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄 Dervitard bin-§atan-§ander$ plays his strawman attack card again. 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄 Dervitard, you need to stop snorting or smoking the hallucinogens making you hallucinate seeing Mystere in the reply sections of this blog. Those illegal drugs, shrooms or Moonbat Moonshine Hooch you're chugging down are opening spiritual portals for demons to possess your carcass.
Another thing, Derpitard: go spend your time with your birther person today. Whoever hatched you needs to be reminded about what happened decades ago, after spending 9 months keeping you in its belly.
\\Qtard: "Many Qtard comments prove otherwise"... Yap. Only. You neither able to confirm it with quotes nor give some plausibly logical explanation -- why so?
\\I AM able to confirm it with a logical explanation.
Yeah? Then why you not doing that?
\\I already gave it.
Contre-factual. Yawn.
\\By "many" I meant high quantity.
Redefinition, no? :-)))))
Brazen one.
\\Qtard: Self-contradictory denial, no?
\\No. That I can't "keep" doing something I have never done is a statement of fact.
Self-contradictory denial. Yawn.
You do strawmaning. Like saying what I did or said -- without correct quotes.
And then immediately, in the very next sentence claiming that "I never did it". BUT YOU DID IT JUST a sentence ago. :-)))))))))))))
That is exactly what "self-contradictory denial" is.
\\You did not. Saying that say "I believe in facts" is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism". It is a trait of an intelligent person.
Aha... that's big.
So, by YOUR definition "intelligent person" is that that: do not what facts and logic is, do not questions, do not like their beliefs being challanged, even though they tend to believe in some non-sense and dismiss fact and factuality... and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Well... yeah. In accorance with SUCH definition -- your perfectly "intelligent person". That I am ready to admit. ;-P
\\Many people (Qtard for example) do not believe in facts. They disbelieve them.
Bonker Derpy. "beleaf" and "disbeleaf" is pretty much the same in given context.
FACTS -- they JUST IS. DO NOT NEED to be believed or not. Ipso factum.
Like. If a stone would fall on your head -- what it would change for you -- if you'd believe it didn't fell... or disbelieve it???? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))) NOTHING!!!
But... claim "I believe in facts" ALLOW you to believe in some non-facts, which didn't happend or even totally impossible to happen. But, looks like Reality for you... as you think, through sheer force of your imagination and "make believe" struggles.
And that is -- definitely Religious Bonkerism. ;-P
As in that "Jesus said to me" case. ;-P
\\Because there no "correct quotes" that prove religious "bonkerism". Only quotes that disprove this.
And which ones exactly?
And can you give some logical explanation -- WHY it so? ;-P
Naah.
You can't.
You just continue your "make believe" games of religious bonker.
\\YOU are Mystere. Mystere is your Blogger account. I don't pretend that people who use multiple IDs are multiple people.
"Yeah? Then why you not doing that?"... I have. Many times. Also you just admitted you involve yourself. There is nothing to give given your admission. Idiot.
"So, by YOUR definition intelligent person is that that..."... It does not matter that you capped "your". The bullplop you wrote is NOT my definition. It sounds to me like your definition.
"Bonker Derpy. beleaf and disbeleaf is pretty much the same in given context"... No. They're opposites.
"But... claim I believe in facts ALLOW you to believe in some non-facts, which didn't happend or even totally impossible to happen"... You are strawmanning me. I have never made such a claim. If something didn't happen (or if it would impossible for it to happen) then it can't be a fact.
"You just continue your make believe games of religious bonker"... When has this happened? Give examples. FYI, Jesus has never said anything to me.
\\"Yeah? Then why you not doing that?"... I have. Many times.
Then... give an example. Of thing you'd call "logical explanation". So I would be on the same page with you. And we could discuss it properly.
Cause... I do not see your screams like "it's PROVED" or "you are FM" as anything resembling being "logical explanation".
As well as this you "I have. Many times." -- that is empty, not supported with facts claim... without EVEN ONE correct quote.
And this one " Also you just admitted you involve yourself. There is nothing to give given your admission. Idiot." is hardly logicla too.
So? You will be opposing? Countre-factually. That that is YOUR words: "Saying that say "I believe in facts" is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism". It is a trait of an intelligent person."????
For you to know. Sentences with structure like "SOMETHING A is SOMETHING B" -- can be counted as definition.
As well as your claim "is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism"." That looks like you opposing to my definition... and giving yours.
\\"Bonker Derpy. beleaf and disbeleaf is pretty much the same in given context"... No. They're opposites.
In given context. When we talk about FACTS. Facts -- that is manifestations of Reality, Real World. Do you know what that mean? ;-P Maybe you do not know, and all your conversations are so misguided beacause of this??? Are you... solipsist???? One who believes that everithing in a world is just a fogment of his own imagination????? :-))))))))))))))))))))
That way... it could explain a big part of your behaviorial quircks.
\\"But... claim I believe in facts ALLOW you to believe in some non-facts, which didn't happend or even totally impossible to happen"... You are strawmanning me.
And how that is strawmaning??? That is YOUR claim -- that you "believe in facts".
And you repeated it in that excerpt too -- "\\Many people (Qtard for example) do not believe in facts. They disbelieve them. "
And added a perfect strawmaning -- that I "disbelieve" facts.
\\I have never made such a claim. If something didn't happen (or if it would impossible for it to happen) then it can't be a fact.
We-e-e-ell.
Just from news.
You USA general prosecutor stated that whole idea of "dRumps collusion with Russian" was FAKE. AKA "something didn't happen (or if it would impossible for it to happen)"
BUT... how many times you have repeated that it is FACT here???
Even though I have pointed it to you -- that that is just "something-something that somebody-somebody have said"... without any proofs or evidances.
A hyper-reality based/constructed upon second-hand knowledge and value-selecting certain facts over and ignoring other fact to create an surreal paranoiac-critical vision.
30 comments:
No!
Jimmy Dore is a Nazi.
Above two comments are Mystere pretending to be me again.
Ho?
So that two (three) dudes in shining armor (fire-proof clothes?) on the roof... was Ukrainins????
And WHY we still have NO video with remants of that "scary Ukrainina Putin-slaughtering heinous machine"????
Maybe, just maybe... there'd be "made in USSR" signs would be on that remanants??? ;-P
Glenn Greenwald and Jimmy Dore are two of Putin's biggest hoax-pushing propagandists. Tucker was number one until Fox fired him.
Rapist tRump found guilty. Has to pay his victim 5 million. Guilt determined by court of law. Though hypocrite Qtard will likely come up with reason it doesn't count.
*I*... don't care.
Well... if that amount of verdicts will pile up. I will say that that'll pile up to a shame of whole USA. And Reps. And Demns. ;-P
Cause. That is how it works.
If you don't care, why don't you go away? No "primal scream" demanding you go away, just confusion re why you involve yourself in discussions about American politics if you don't care. Why not instead read and comment on some Trekkie fanboy board?
Why would he want to read YOUR blog, Dervy?
I have never mentioned Star Trek on my blog. You know this. Anyway, Qtard will never read my blog. To fearful that he might learn something.
\\If you don't care, why don't you go away?
Why should I??? ;-P
\\why you involve yourself in discussions about American politics if you don't care.
And we discussion American politics??? WHERE???!!!! :-))))))))))))
From MY POV(point of view) it do not look like that. AT ALL. ;-P
Well... to that last snark -- I'm lifetime learner. ;-P
So, that would mean only -- that there is nothing to learn from.
Some grabage of a thought non-process. ;-P
\\Why not instead read and comment on some Trekkie fanboy board?
And why should I???
That is YOUR interests.
\\Qtard will never read my blog. To fearful that he might learn something.
Because there's nothing to comment?
Or there is no anonimous comments allowed.
Don't remember.
But... do you really want ME in your blog??? :-))))))))))))))
Doubt it. Very much. :-))))))))))))
I would be banned in a jiffy of time.
I'm sure he could fashion a parody blog fashioned about you as he does all his heroes. The section dedicated to me is quite extensive.
:-)))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Why should I?
Because the topics of discussion here are of no interest to you. Proven with comments like, "I don't care", "Not my problem" and "whos zat?". Also because you desire not to be involved. What I don't understand is why you continue to punish yourself by reading and commenting on a blog where the topics being discussed don't interest you.
Qtard: And we discussion American politics??? WHERE? ... From MY POV it do not look like that. AT ALL.
Your POV is that of a FM.
Qtard: I'm lifetime learner.
You are uninterested and incapable of learning. Uninterested by your own admission.
Qtard: Some grabage of a thought non-process.
"Garbage thought non-process" describes how Qtard's brain functions.
Qtard: "Why not instead read and comment on some Trekkie fanboy board?"... And why should I? That is YOUR interests.
You are the one who calls himself "Q" (after the Star Trek character). I have seen some of the movies and some of the television episodes. Qtard, on the other hand, is a bigly Trekkie fanboy. As CONFIRMED by his many denials. Because (as per qtarded logic) when you deny something that confirms you are guilty of it.
Qtard: I would be banned in a jiffy of time.
You've banned yourself by refusing to create a Blogger account. It's easy to do.
Minus: I'm sure he could fashion a parody blog fashioned about you as he does all his heroes. The section dedicated to me is quite extensive.
I have zero parody blogs dedicated to any of my heroes. If Minus is implying he is a "hero" of mine he is mistaken.
I'll let your "wall of fame' speak for itself.
I don't have one.
\\Because the topics of discussion here are of no interest to you.
Your *framing* of it. Not discussions itself. Yawn. ;-P
\\Also because you desire not to be involved.
I am NOT. In the first place. Yawn.
But you keep that strawmaning attacks.
Continue-continue. :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Show that you are totqalitarian... wannnabe.
\\What I don't understand is why you continue to punish yourself by reading and commenting on a blog where the topics being discussed don't interest you.
Really. Why you continue coming to a place where they call you idiot? Rightefully. :-)))))))))))))))
Masohism? ;-P
Or... that is just that natural trait of narcissist showing?
\\Your POV is that of a FM.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And that is ALL what you can say?
Yeah, of course. Cause you are damn hilarious r.b. ;-P
\\You are uninterested and incapable of learning. Uninterested by your own admission.
It's impossible to be interested in missives of obvious idiocy.
Cause... they are too damn predictable. NO news.
That's why I am not. ;-P
\\"Garbage thought non-process" describes how Qtard's brain functions.
Sentence generated by brain that blatantly incapable of producing ANY own original thought... that's why it reusing and trying to throw back words of opponents.
That is -- hilarious. :-))))))))))))
While obvious idiocy is stupid and uninterested. Per se.
The veriety of how that idiocy manififestates... is like of that trilobites. Facinating, just fascinating. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\You are the one who calls himself "Q" (after the Star Trek character).
Yes?
Or that is just YOU who assumed it? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
And revealed itself being that Demn trekkie. ;-P
And your denial of it... just priceless. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\ As CONFIRMED by his many denials. Because (as per qtarded logic) when you deny something that confirms you are guilty of it.
Aha... and you can support that "confirmed" with CORRECT quotes???
Naaaaah. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And your denial of it -- that claims need to be proved with FACTUAL quotes -- showing that you are proven guilty. Being blatantly militant religiously biggoted idiot. ;-P
Qtard: Your *framing* of it. Not discussions itself. Yawn.
Self-contradictory denial. Claim to be interested, then declare disinterest with a "yawn".
Qtard: I am NOT. In the first place. Yawn.
Many Qtard comments prove otherwise.
Qtard: But you keep that strawmaning attacks.
Impossible. I cannot "keep" doing something I have never done.
Qtard: Why you continue coming to a place where they call you idiot?
Why does Qtard come to a place where he is rightfully called an idiot? I am defending my human rights. I won't be driven away by Qtard's primal screams of "idiot!!".
Qtard: It's impossible to be interested in missives of obvious idiocy. ... That's why I am not.
LOL! Non-interest explains your many lengthy replies? And demands for replies? ("where are you?", etc).
Qtard: ...revealed itself being that Demn trekkie. And your denial of it... just priceless.
Qtard's denial proves he is a Trekkie. And embarrassed I guessed correctly why he calls himself "Q".
Qtard: ...you can support that "confirmed" with CORRECT quotes???
Where are your correct quotes confirming I am a "religious bonker", asshole? Why do I need correct quotes and Qtard does not?
Qtard: ...claims need to be proved with FACTUAL quotes.
Unless it is Qtard making the claim. Then he can just pull accusations out of his ass. Because Qtard is a huge hypocrite.
\\Self-contradictory denial. Claim to be interested, then declare disinterest with a "yawn".
For an idiot? Yes.
I like to eat fish, but do not like to catch it.
Or.
I like to catch fish, but it tastes... yak. ;-P
Self-contradictory??? Yeah :-))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: I am NOT. In the first place. Yawn.
\\Many Qtard comments prove otherwise.
Yap. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
Only.
You neither able to confirm it with quotes nor give some plausibly logical explanation -- why so?
Bu never the less... because you... who are you??? actually, for that that you basless moronic blurts would/could/should be regarded as Truth... without ANY confirmation???!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Impossible. I cannot "keep" doing something I have never done.
Self-contradictory denial, no? ;-P
\\Why does Qtard come to a place where he is rightfully called an idiot? I am defending my human rights. I won't be driven away by Qtard's primal screams of "idiot!!".
Of course.
Cause you are idiot.
YET ONE demonstartive confirmation of you being idiot -- idiots, do not understand that they are idiots. ;-P Have not that much brains. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\LOL! Non-interest explains your many lengthy replies? And demands for replies? ("where are you?", etc).
I stated many times.
Openly and truthfully.
That your missive -- do not interest me.
But your behavior -- is. ;-P
\\Qtard's denial proves he is a Trekkie. And embarrassed I guessed correctly why he calls himself "Q".
Defrinitely. Trekkie in denial. Idotic one to boot. Who dunno that there can be some other meanings of Q.
Cause... how else he'd know that being trekkie -- is emberrassing?
Surely, some foreigner would not know.
Like. Capital latter from English alphabet, for example.
And that makes me "Alphabettian in denial", of course. ROFLing :-))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Where are your correct quotes confirming I am a "religious bonker", asshole? Why do I need correct quotes and Qtard does not?
I gave it to you.
Many times.
That link where you say "I believe in facts" -- that is definite trait of religious bonkerism. ;-P
To believe in something that do not need to be -- that is damn crackpot idea. ;-P
But... you KEEP confirming that... each time... when you ignore MY correct quotes.
Like this time.
Now.
You have few choices.
Either.
You'd dismiss you false religious faith "I believe in facts". ;-P
Or... you'd continue being u.u.r.b.
Choice is yours. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But I know what you'd chose -- cause you are u.u.r.b.
Fake comments from "Mystere"? I don't see this "Mystere" guy here, Dervish. I see 2 comments above with your avatar and one with your name but no avatar, Dervitard bin $atan-$ander$.
Hey Q! You're right about Dervitard's hate blogs. He's fixated on slandering people he hates and spewing libel as long as he can get away with it without getting sued by his targets. Dervitard is also fixated on Donald Trump's private parts, as seen on his hate sites. Dervitard fantasizes about having brokeback moments with his gods Putin and the Biden Crime Family. He wants to shower in a locker room with his gods aka the Biden Crime Family, as seen on his hate blog sites. Dervitard blushes and wants us to go away, because we keep exposing his dirty fantasies for the sick deranged things they really are.
Dervitard bin-$atan-$ander$' hate blogs are his Moonbat Hall Of Shame sites. Dervitard's blog stalking on his vulgar hate site Whoz Yo Mama shows only a small slice of his mental illness. His fixation on stalking those he hates and his doxxing on his hate sites barely scratches the surface of his mental derangement. The authorities in Paris Tennessee will capture him one day when he least expects it to happen to him.
Posting people's addresses, phone numbers and other personal information such as Social Security Numbers and Driver License numbers or license plate numbers from trucks or cars registered to those you hate isn't very bright, Dervitard bin-$atan-$anders.
Derpitard better watch the hate he posts...
Qtard: "Many Qtard comments prove otherwise"... Yap. Only. You neither able to confirm it with quotes nor give some plausibly logical explanation -- why so?
I AM able to confirm it with a logical explanation. I already gave it. By "many" I meant high quantity. There are many Qtard comments. Anyone who isn't blind can see this.
Qtard: Self-contradictory denial, no?
No. That I can't "keep" doing something I have never done is a statement of fact. Understandable that a fact-challenged FM like you would have difficulty understanding.
Qtard: Where are your correct quotes confirming I am a religious bonker"... I gave it to you. Many times.
You did not. Saying that say "I believe in facts" is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism". It is a trait of an intelligent person. Many people (Qtard for example) do not believe in facts. They disbelieve them.
Qtard: But... you KEEP confirming that... each time... when you ignore MY correct quotes.
"each time" is no times. Because there no "correct quotes" that prove religious "bonkerism". Only quotes that disprove this.
Fugly Mystere: Fake comments from "Mystere"? I don't see this "Mystere" guy here, Dervish.
YOU are Mystere. Mystere is your Blogger account. I don't pretend that people who use multiple IDs are multiple people.
🔺😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄 Dervitard bin-§atan-§ander$ plays his strawman attack card again. 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄 Dervitard, you need to stop snorting or smoking the hallucinogens making you hallucinate seeing Mystere in the reply sections of this blog. Those illegal drugs, shrooms or Moonbat Moonshine Hooch you're chugging down are opening spiritual portals for demons to possess your carcass.
Another thing, Derpitard: go spend your time with your birther person today. Whoever hatched you needs to be reminded about what happened decades ago, after spending 9 months keeping you in its belly.
\\Qtard: "Many Qtard comments prove otherwise"... Yap. Only. You neither able to confirm it with quotes nor give some plausibly logical explanation -- why so?
\\I AM able to confirm it with a logical explanation.
Yeah?
Then why you not doing that?
\\I already gave it.
Contre-factual. Yawn.
\\By "many" I meant high quantity.
Redefinition, no? :-)))))
Brazen one.
\\Qtard: Self-contradictory denial, no?
\\No. That I can't "keep" doing something I have never done is a statement of fact.
Self-contradictory denial. Yawn.
You do strawmaning. Like saying what I did or said -- without correct quotes.
And then immediately, in the very next sentence claiming that "I never did it". BUT YOU DID IT JUST a sentence ago. :-)))))))))))))
That is exactly what "self-contradictory denial" is.
Like when Pinocchio trying to say "I didn't lie"... just a moment AFTER (and BEFORE) his nose grown bigger.
\\You did not. Saying that say "I believe in facts" is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism". It is a trait of an intelligent person.
Aha... that's big.
So, by YOUR definition "intelligent person" is that that: do not what facts and logic is, do not questions, do not like their beliefs being challanged, even though they tend to believe in some non-sense and dismiss fact and factuality... and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Well... yeah. In accorance with SUCH definition -- your perfectly "intelligent person". That I am ready to admit. ;-P
\\Many people (Qtard for example) do not believe in facts. They disbelieve them.
Bonker Derpy. "beleaf" and "disbeleaf" is pretty much the same in given context.
FACTS -- they JUST IS.
DO NOT NEED to be believed or not. Ipso factum.
Like.
If a stone would fall on your head -- what it would change for you -- if you'd believe it didn't fell... or disbelieve it???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
NOTHING!!!
But... claim "I believe in facts" ALLOW you to believe in some non-facts, which didn't happend or even totally impossible to happen.
But, looks like Reality for you... as you think, through sheer force of your imagination and "make believe" struggles.
And that is -- definitely Religious Bonkerism. ;-P
As in that "Jesus said to me" case. ;-P
\\Because there no "correct quotes" that prove religious "bonkerism". Only quotes that disprove this.
And which ones exactly?
And can you give some logical explanation -- WHY it so? ;-P
Naah.
You can't.
You just continue your "make believe" games of religious bonker.
\\YOU are Mystere. Mystere is your Blogger account. I don't pretend that people who use multiple IDs are multiple people.
What's the problem?
Ignore him. If you don't like his quirks so much.
"Yeah? Then why you not doing that?"... I have. Many times. Also you just admitted you involve yourself. There is nothing to give given your admission. Idiot.
"So, by YOUR definition intelligent person is that that..."... It does not matter that you capped "your". The bullplop you wrote is NOT my definition. It sounds to me like your definition.
"Bonker Derpy. beleaf and disbeleaf is pretty much the same in given context"... No. They're opposites.
"But... claim I believe in facts ALLOW you to believe in some non-facts, which didn't happend or even totally impossible to happen"... You are strawmanning me. I have never made such a claim. If something didn't happen (or if it would impossible for it to happen) then it can't be a fact.
"You just continue your make believe games of religious bonker"... When has this happened? Give examples. FYI, Jesus has never said anything to me.
\\"Yeah? Then why you not doing that?"... I have. Many times.
Then... give an example.
Of thing you'd call "logical explanation".
So I would be on the same page with you.
And we could discuss it properly.
Cause... I do not see your screams like "it's PROVED" or "you are FM" as anything resembling being "logical explanation".
As well as this you "I have. Many times." -- that is empty, not supported with facts claim... without EVEN ONE correct quote.
And this one " Also you just admitted you involve yourself. There is nothing to give given your admission. Idiot." is hardly logicla too.
So? You will be opposing? Countre-factually.
That that is YOUR words: "Saying that say "I believe in facts" is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism". It is a trait of an intelligent person."????
For you to know. Sentences with structure like "SOMETHING A is SOMETHING B" -- can be counted as definition.
As well as your claim "is not a "definite trait of religious bonkerism"."
That looks like you opposing to my definition... and giving yours.
\\"Bonker Derpy. beleaf and disbeleaf is pretty much the same in given context"... No. They're opposites.
In given context.
When we talk about FACTS.
Facts -- that is manifestations of Reality, Real World. Do you know what that mean? ;-P
Maybe you do not know, and all your conversations are so misguided beacause of this???
Are you... solipsist????
One who believes that everithing in a world is just a fogment of his own imagination????? :-))))))))))))))))))))
That way... it could explain a big part of your behaviorial quircks.
\\"But... claim I believe in facts ALLOW you to believe in some non-facts, which didn't happend or even totally impossible to happen"... You are strawmanning me.
And how that is strawmaning???
That is YOUR claim -- that you "believe in facts".
And you repeated it in that excerpt too -- "\\Many people (Qtard for example) do not believe in facts. They disbelieve them.
"
And added a perfect strawmaning -- that I "disbelieve" facts.
\\I have never made such a claim. If something didn't happen (or if it would impossible for it to happen) then it can't be a fact.
We-e-e-ell.
Just from news.
You USA general prosecutor stated that whole idea of "dRumps collusion with Russian" was FAKE.
AKA "something didn't happen (or if it would impossible for it to happen)"
BUT... how many times you have repeated that it is FACT here???
Even though I have pointed it to you -- that that is just "something-something that somebody-somebody have said"... without any proofs or evidances.
A hyper-reality based/constructed upon second-hand knowledge and value-selecting certain facts over and ignoring other fact to create an surreal paranoiac-critical vision.
Here's derpy value-selecting his "facts"... like certain giraffe necks "burning with desire" and other monstruous inventions.
Well... thatś how Intelligence works. ;-P
Just try to look at it from technological POV.
You have a task to create entity/robot -- that need to react rationally.. to such an enormous pile of utter mess as our Universe is.
But you not allowed. Just cannot translate and insert some a priori info in that brains...
That is how Evolution was limited when created us.
And... probably we would be limited. Like in that scenario of sending probes to other stars.
There could be just not enough space.
So we would need to pack only most important info and capabilities into less space possible.
So, there´d be no space for sending reproductions of Mona Liza there. ;-)
Post a Comment