The Missouri bills never made it out of committee in the state House and Senate, but via other laws Missouri parents already have the ability to opt their kids out of sex ed classes with objectionable curricula. For the most part the resulting curricula as far as I know doesn't rock the boat because they would be a mass exodus if they did.
DeSantis collected money for and supported the Parental Rights in Education Bill. PP lobbied against it under the mantra "Stop the Don't Say Gay Bill". If there's any confusion, it was all deliberate on PP's behalf.
I wouldn't say I was pro or anti grooming. People need to earn a living. But with 3 dogs it cost my parents over $100 to get them all groomed. So I started doing it for them. They are well behaved but it still takes quite a bit of time to cut and wash one dog. When they need haircuts I'll just do one a day.
Beamishderp read content into my comment that isn't there. I say he is expressing an unconscious desire and projecting it onto me. My comment concerned hair cutting and bathing. Nothing else.
Derpy read comments about grooming kids to be catamites and immediately thought about dogs. That's just weird. Almost as weird as turning down a pet groomer that will clean up 3 dogs for a paltry $100 so his parents can buy crack cocaine instead.
Beamish is really fixated on catamites. Must be a fantasy of his - to have a stable of boys he can use for his sexual gratification whenever he feels like it.
Minus probably doesn't even consider what Matt Gatez did to be grooming. In his opinion Matt is another alpha male.
Derpy is the activist that says "Gays should vote Democrat, but conceal the smell of shit wafting from their dicks and mouths with body spray and Tic-Tacs."
The case has gone to trial and been judged already? Who knew?
My comment concerned the source of the allegations. Your insinuation is that Stephen Alford made them up. He did not. I provided (with links to verify) the actual sources of the allegations. I didn't say Matt Gaetz has been convicted of anything... YET.
He seems embarrassed by the specifics of his feigned concerns.
What "specifics"? The bullshit you made up? Why would your false allegations embarrass me? btw, I didn't feign any concerns. I am genuinely concerned about your fixation with catamites. If you're sexually abusing underage boys you need to be exposed and prosecuted.
You are embarrassed by the specifics of homosexual behavior and activity. You chide that there is a difference between a homosexual and the behaviors and activities that define them as a homosexual, as if the difference you're splitting is going to be an acceptable compromise for the group you're championing against the "bigots." You are telling homosexuals, "Sure, go ahead and buy Maroon 5 CDs and play them in your own home. Maybe you can wear a Maroon 5 T-shirt in certain company. If you really need to be fabulous, move to San Francisco or absolutely any inch of Massachusetts. Stay ambiguous. Under NO circumstances are you to churn another man's feces with your genitals. You can't be specifically gay. Look at Will and Grace on TV. You never saw them talking about rectal lesions and irritable bowel syndrome."
Yes, the specifics embarrass you. As if teaching schoolchildren about homosexuality is just going to cover decorating with ferns and ordering steaks well done.
OK. Yes, the bullshit you made up. Children are aware straight people exist. That isn't a verboten topic for young kids. Educators don't go into graphic detail re the sex lives of straight people.
Also, heterosexual people have anal sex. I'm not embarrassed, I just don't get off talking about it in as graphic as possible terms (like you clearly do). Sex between consenting adults isn't my business (unless I'm one of them).
You are embarrassed. Your "Straight people listen to Maroon 5 too" deflection practically screams (or lispy hisses) to justify homosexual behavior in sanitized terms. You're still trying to pick up the clean end of a turd and failing miserably. If you didn't find homosexual behavior inherently disgusting you'd stop trying to use perverse heterosexual behaviors to justify it.
This reminds me of the paleo-historic wars between our Amoebic and Protozoan ancestors, especially when they began experimenting with parasitism and immunology.
I'm fully aware services that are "free" (Twitter, Facebook) make money through advertising and data harvesting. As far as I can tell "Jack's Magic Coffee Shop" isn't a real coffee shop.
57 comments:
The Missouri bills never made it out of committee in the state House and Senate, but via other laws Missouri parents already have the ability to opt their kids out of sex ed classes with objectionable curricula. For the most part the resulting curricula as far as I know doesn't rock the boat because they would be a mass exodus if they did.
i.e. the rot hasn't reached us yet
You're dreaming. the rot is everywhere.
It's like the green knight, the moment you think you've chopped his head off, he's back.
Perhaps. I don't have kids to come home and tell me what they learned in school today.
Still, Missouri, at least in the boonies where I live, doesn't see a lot of the freak show outside television.
Oh, it'll get there. There's a cost that usually comes with "free". And there seem to be more and more people every day willing to pay it.
Ron desantis takes money from Planned Parenthood? I call bullshit. Why would PP give him money to legislate hate?
DeSantis collected money for and supported the Parental Rights in Education Bill. PP lobbied against it under the mantra "Stop the Don't Say Gay Bill". If there's any confusion, it was all deliberate on PP's behalf.
"parental rights" only for parents who are bigots. Parental rights trampled for non bigot parents.
The non-bigot parents aren't going to have grandchildren, so...
Dervy is pro-Grooming.
He was groomed that way
My favorite groomers...
I wouldn't say I was pro or anti grooming. People need to earn a living. But with 3 dogs it cost my parents over $100 to get them all groomed. So I started doing it for them. They are well behaved but it still takes quite a bit of time to cut and wash one dog. When they need haircuts I'll just do one a day.
The non-bigot parents aren't going to have grandchildren...
Beamish = bigly derp. Thinks the children of non bigots are born sterile. And (for some reason) won't adopt or use a surrogate.
Ewww. Derpy grooms dogs to be gay. Does he start them licking Alpo out of his crotch as puppies?
Beamishderp read content into my comment that isn't there. I say he is expressing an unconscious desire and projecting it onto me. My comment concerned hair cutting and bathing. Nothing else.
Says the guy who thought of dogs when the topic of grooming children for sex came up.
He says "don't be a bigot, dogs like being molested."
I was responding to the accusation that I am pro grooming. Which is absurd. So I posted something absurd in response.
He says "don't be a bigot, dogs like being molested."
Nobody except you said this.
btw, Minus defends Matt Gaetz, the scumbag who groomed underage girls. Minus is pro-grooming.
Minus defends Gaetz with bullshit about him being "framed". The same bullshit defense he uses to deny donald tRump's proven Putin collusion.
^^Must have access to really good weed^^
>>your pointers should look like this<<
^^...and shrooms^^
Derpy read comments about grooming kids to be catamites and immediately thought about dogs. That's just weird. Almost as weird as turning down a pet groomer that will clean up 3 dogs for a paltry $100 so his parents can buy crack cocaine instead.
Beamish is really fixated on catamites. Must be a fantasy of his - to have a stable of boys he can use for his sexual gratification whenever he feels like it.
Minus probably doesn't even consider what Matt Gatez did to be grooming. In his opinion Matt is another alpha male.
I certainly don't take blackmailer tales as Gospel, either.
The accounts of Matt Gaetz grooming underage girls originated with his accomplice Joel Greenberg, his victims, and his congressional republican colleagues... not a purported blackmailer.
The case has gone to trial and been judged already? Who knew?
Derpy will stand up for gays as long as nobody accuses him of standing with them. Weird, huh?
Homophobe?
Probably. He seems embarrassed by the specifics of his feigned concerns.
Derpy is the activist that says "Gays should vote Democrat, but conceal the smell of shit wafting from their dicks and mouths with body spray and Tic-Tacs."
The case has gone to trial and been judged already? Who knew?
My comment concerned the source of the allegations. Your insinuation is that Stephen Alford made them up. He did not. I provided (with links to verify) the actual sources of the allegations. I didn't say Matt Gaetz has been convicted of anything... YET.
He seems embarrassed by the specifics of his feigned concerns.
What "specifics"? The bullshit you made up? Why would your false allegations embarrass me? btw, I didn't feign any concerns. I am genuinely concerned about your fixation with catamites. If you're sexually abusing underage boys you need to be exposed and prosecuted.
Charged?
You're eager for Matt to be charged? Me too. His accomplice Joel Greenberg pleaded guilty, so I'm sure the Gaetz charges are coming.
"On May 17, 2021, he [Greenberg] pleaded guilty to six federal charges, including sex trafficking of a minor..."
A year ago... with a DNC led DOJ? lol!
You are embarrassed by the specifics of homosexual behavior and activity. You chide that there is a difference between a homosexual and the behaviors and activities that define them as a homosexual, as if the difference you're splitting is going to be an acceptable compromise for the group you're championing against the "bigots." You are telling homosexuals, "Sure, go ahead and buy Maroon 5 CDs and play them in your own home. Maybe you can wear a Maroon 5 T-shirt in certain company. If you really need to be fabulous, move to San Francisco or absolutely any inch of Massachusetts. Stay ambiguous. Under NO circumstances are you to churn another man's feces with your genitals. You can't be specifically gay. Look at Will and Grace on TV. You never saw them talking about rectal lesions and irritable bowel syndrome."
Yes, the specifics embarrass you. As if teaching schoolchildren about homosexuality is just going to cover decorating with ferns and ordering steaks well done.
You know what they say, "the devil's in the details-"
OK. Yes, the bullshit you made up. Children are aware straight people exist. That isn't a verboten topic for young kids. Educators don't go into graphic detail re the sex lives of straight people.
Also, heterosexual people have anal sex. I'm not embarrassed, I just don't get off talking about it in as graphic as possible terms (like you clearly do). Sex between consenting adults isn't my business (unless I'm one of them).
The DNC doesn't lead the DOJ.
You are embarrassed. Your "Straight people listen to Maroon 5 too" deflection practically screams (or lispy hisses) to justify homosexual behavior in sanitized terms. You're still trying to pick up the clean end of a turd and failing miserably. If you didn't find homosexual behavior inherently disgusting you'd stop trying to use perverse heterosexual behaviors to justify it.
You're a bigot and an idiot. I never mentioned Maroon 5.
lol! Tell that to the AG.
He knows. Apparently you don't.
Why'd he back the J6 committee subpoena for testimony of Republican Congressmen then? It's never been done before?
Because the RNC isn't leading the DOJ.
There's almost 100 years of history before the first Republican got elected.
There is only 1 year of history since the DOJ was lead by a partisan AG acting as the personal lawyer of the predisent.
If that were so, Trump would still be President. He would have exposed the election/DNC voter graft and corruption.
This reminds me of the paleo-historic wars between our Amoebic and Protozoan ancestors, especially when they began experimenting with parasitism and immunology.
Hey, it's long past twilight for atavism.
...Everything's retro now.
Drinking from the fount of Deep State partisanship.
...cuz Dervy thinks that there's no cost for free stuff.
I'm fully aware services that are "free" (Twitter, Facebook) make money through advertising and data harvesting. As far as I can tell "Jack's Magic Coffee Shop" isn't a real coffee shop.
Post a Comment