Strange that you disagree with Ronald Reagan ignoring the AIDs crisis while you agree with Dotard ignoring the coronavirus pandemic. Why is that? I would think you'd be happy about more gay men dying.
What I can't stand is political idiots like Fauci hijacking the medical establishment to benefit a tine minority of highly political operatives. Fauci, et al, set cancer research back 10 years in the 80's, and he's doing it again now. Covid only threatens the AARP.
Sure, your imaginary gay brother and your imaginary gay son. You hate both of them. If you loved them you'd want them to be happy (and be able to marry who they love).
13 comments:
No.
lol! You remind me of all the 'oficialista' pencil whipping problem solvers of the world.
Like the CDC bureaucrats (Fauci, et al) who conflated heterosexual and homosexual AIDs in the 80s.
There are two different strains of the AIDs virus? "Hetro-AIDs" and "Homo-AIDs"? Who knew?
No there were two means of sexual transmission, vaginal and anal. And the viral loads associated with the latter weres 100x deadlier than the former.
Strange that you disagree with Ronald Reagan ignoring the AIDs crisis while you agree with Dotard ignoring the coronavirus pandemic. Why is that? I would think you'd be happy about more gay men dying.
Why would that make me happy? Are you happy with more people with cancer dying because the CDC is currently obsessed with Covid research?
Because you hate gay people.
...like my brother and my son? lol!
What I can't stand is political idiots like Fauci hijacking the medical establishment to benefit a tine minority of highly political operatives. Fauci, et al, set cancer research back 10 years in the 80's, and he's doing it again now. Covid only threatens the AARP.
Sure, your imaginary gay brother and your imaginary gay son. You hate both of them. If you loved them you'd want them to be happy (and be able to marry who they love).
They both have.
...but are abstinent virgins?
Post a Comment