Gov. Martin O'Malley's proposal to require handgun licenses would make the state more than twice as much as it would cost to administer the program, according to a Department of Legislative Services analysis released Monday night.
The analysis is the first independent look the costs of licensing, which advocates call the most effective and the most controversial piece of O'Malley's sweeping gun proposal.
Requiring a license to buy a handgun in Maryland would generate $3.8 million for Maryland in its first year, after the Maryland State Police hires 22 people to help implement the program. By the second year, the state would generate $5 million, more than twice the cost to give out the licenses.
Handgun purchasers must now undergo a background check and complete a 30-minute, online safety training course. Under O'Malley's proposal, no one could buy a handgun without first obtaining a license, which requires a a $100 fee, undergoing more expansive background check, completing an eight-hour training course and giving digital fingerprints to state police.
Gun control advocates say licensure cuts down on "straw-purchases" because the more rigourous buying process deters people from purchasing guns for criminals to use.
Opponents of O'Malley's gun-control program has likened the requirement to a poll tax that would only allow weathly people to own guns.
The governor is scheduled to testify Wednesday on the first public hearing of his public safety bill, which includes the gun licensing provision and a ban on assault rifles.
Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Guns, the Next "Sin" Tax Revenue Stream...
from the Baltimore Sun
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This is a hare brained idea at best. The analysts who contend that the gun licensing fees will double the cost to administer are the same ones that then-Sen. Tom McCall (R-Or) asked the following:
"If marginal federal tax rates are increased from their current 39.6% to 100%, what would be the amount collected annually?"
And these dolt bureaucrat number crunchers started punching numbers on their calculators to come up with astronomical figures, when the immediate answer doesn't need a calculator: the answer to Sen. McCall's question is ZERO.
Nobody will tolerate the government taking EVERYTHING they make, it simply won't be the case.
Post a Comment