The irony of the political funding of Art, which censors by financing not forbidding.
History is "linear" / Progressive, NOT Cyclical, Dammit!
The famous "attack" on Arnold Toynbee in Encounter magazine was a scathing intellectual demolition written by British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper. Published in the June 1957 issue of Encounter under the title "Arnold Toynbee's Millennium," the essay effectively broke Toynbee’s massive public and academic reputation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]At the time, Toynbee was a globally revered intellectual celebrated for his bestselling, 10-volume masterpiece, A Study of History. However, Trevor-Roper used his famously sharp, pitiless, and sarcastic prose to tear the work to pieces. [1, 2, 3]Key Arguments of the Critique
- The "Messiah" Accusation: Trevor-Roper Mocked Toynbee for constructing an ego-driven narrative, accusing him of viewing himself as a literal Messiah complete with his own "temptations, missionary journeys, and revelations." [1]
- The Religion of "Mish-Mash": Toynbee argued that Western civilization was in decay and advocated for a syncretic, global spiritual solution. Trevor-Roper fundamentally loathed this, calling it a self-concocted "religion of Mish-Mash." [1, 2]
- Anti-Rationalism: Trevor-Roper attacked Toynbee’s view of history as deterministic and anti-rational, arguing that Toynbee despised "everything which suggests the freedom of the human reason." [1]
The ImpactThe essay acted as a cultural "massacre" of Toynbee's credibility. Prior to the June 1957 article, Toynbee was viewed by the general public as a profound prophet of history; afterward, his academic reputation never fully recovered, and the essay emboldened other experts to publicly dismantle his historical methodology. [1, 2, 3, 4]If you are researching this particular era of intellectual history, let me know if you would like to explore:
- The fierce counter-debates that followed in subsequent issues of Encounter.
- The controversial political background of Encounter magazine itself (including its secret CIA funding).
- Trevor-Roper's other famous academic feuds, such as his clashes with A. J. P. Taylor or Evelyn Waugh
When the CIA Drives Your Bus off the Road...
from Google AI:
In Atom Egoyan’s film adaptation and Russell Banks’s novel The Sweet Hereafter, Robert Browning’s poem The Pied Piper of Hamelin acts as a dark allegorical framework exploring the loss of a town's children, broken promises, and collective guilt. [1, 2, 3, 4]Key Elements of the Analogy
- The Loss of the Generation: In the folk tale, the Piper leads away the children of Hamelin into a mountain cave as retribution for the town's broken promise and greed. In The Sweet Hereafter, a tragic school bus crash claims the lives of 14 children in a small mountain community (Sam Dent), wiping out an entire generation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
- The "Pied Pipers" (False Saviors and Influences):
- Mitchell Stephens (the lawyer): The big-city class-action lawyer who descends upon the grieving town acts as a modern Pied Piper. Instead of musical notes, he uses the promise of justice, revenge, and financial compensation to charm and lead the parents, though his crusade only tears the community apart further and unearths ugly local secrets. His drive is also fueled by his own personal failure and alienation from his drug-addicted daughter.
- Fate or Internal Decadence: Just as the Hamelin townsfolk brought about their own doom through dishonesty, the accident in Sam Dent parallels the hidden moral rot, secret affairs, incest, and fractures within the community. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
- Nicole Burnell (The Lame Child Parallels):
- In Browning's poem, a single lame child is left behind, unable to keep up, and spends his life mourning the magical paradise he missed.
- Nicole—a teenage survivor paralyzed from the waist down by the crash—initially mirrors this crippled child. However, she subverts the role: she consciously lies during her deposition to kill the class-action lawsuit, effectively stopping the lawyer's toxic orchestration and saving the town from further psychological destruction, becoming a different kind of guiding force.
Abdul El-Sayed is apparently
ReplyDeletea dangerous radical. Michigan’s deserve to know exactly who he is before they cast their vote for him.
Apparently Veronica you are an Islamophobic bigot who listens to the bullshit the Reichwing Islamophobes feed those to damn lazy to actually educate themselves about the actual truth around the people they so readily shit on.
Delete))))))))))
DeleteOh, Great Guru Lessy Nazi Comi... and its mantras, here's again.)))
Delete🥸Me (asking AI Question): What do Nazi Communists believe?
Delete🤖Gemini: Nazism and communism are distinct and opposing ideologies rather than a single combined belief system, though the Nazi Party historically used the word "socialist" in its official name (National Socialist German Workers' Party) to attract working-class voters. In practice, the Nazis and the communists were fierce ideological arch-enemies.🛑
DeleteYes, communist factions, leaders, and states were frequently fierce ideological arch-enemies to each other. Despite the external perception of a unified global movement, history shows that communists often reacted to internal heresies and rival communist factions far more viciously than they did to traditional capitalist adversaries.
Time Magazine
+1
Because communist legitimacy was derived from a strict adherence to scientific Marxism rather than democratic votes or royal lineage, any disagreement on policy was treated not as a difference of opinion, but as a dangerous betrayal of the revolution.
Time Magazine
Major Global Schisms
Conflict / Split Key Figures / Factions Core Ideological Disagreement Outcome
The Stalin-Trotsky Feud
(1920s–1930s) Joseph Stalin vs. Leon Trotsky "Socialism in One Country" vs. "Permanent Revolution." Stalin wanted to fortify the USSR internally first; Trotsky argued communism must be immediately exported worldwide to survive. Trotsky was exiled, branded the ultimate "arch-enemy" by Soviet propaganda, and assassinated. Millions of suspected "Trotskyists" were executed in Stalin's Great Purges.
Sino-Soviet Split
(1956–1960s) Nikita Khrushchev (USSR) vs. Mao Zedong (China) De-Stalinization and "Peaceful Coexistence." Mao viewed Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin and efforts to ease tensions with the US as weak revisionism. Mao believed in continuous, violent peasant revolution. A total breakdown of diplomatic, economic, and military relations. It fractured the global communist movement and led to deadly border skirmishes in 1969.
Soviet-Yugoslav Split
(1948) Joseph Stalin (USSR) vs. Josip Broz Tito (Yugoslavia) National Sovereignty. Tito refused to let Yugoslavia become a compliant puppet state of Moscow, preferring an independent path to socialism. Yugoslavia was expelled from the Soviet bloc. Stalin attempted multiple times to assassinate Tito, who went on to help found the Non-Aligned Movement.
Cambodian-Vietnamese War
(1978–1979) Pol Pot (Khmer Rouge) vs. Vietnam (Soviet-backed) Ultranationalism vs. Regional Hegemony. Pol Pot's regime practiced an extreme, agrarian form of communism mixed with intense anti-Vietnamese racism. A full-scale war where a communist nation (Vietnam) invaded and overthrew another communist government (the Khmer Rouge) to halt border raids.
Why Internal Rivalries Were So Deadly
The Monopoly on Truth: In Marxist-Leninist thought, there is only one correct path forward for humanity. Deviating from the party line meant you were actively delaying human liberation, which justified your elimination.
Paranoia and Infiltration: Communist political cultures were heavily plagued by paranoia regarding subversion, treason, and internal enemies. This made it incredibly easy for leaders to label internal political rivals as "counter-revolutionaries" or "bourgeois spies" to justify purging them.
The "Narcissism of Small Differences": Just as in religious schisms, the closer two political groups were in basic theory, the more violently they fought over minor interpretations of texts (like the writings of Lenin or Marx) to prove their own absolute legitimacy.
Time Magazine
What's your point? Don't have one?
DeleteMy points are as always -- OPEN AND OBVIOUS OBJECTIVE *FACTS*.
DeleteYawn.
But you are cretin. Allergic and histericly-blind to a facts.
Yawn.
Your observations cut straight to the core of an ongoing, intense debate in political science and sociology. The intersection of right-wing politics, worker appeal, and social justice rhetoric is complex, and the academic consensus aligns closely with your skepticism about the gap between propaganda and implementation.
Delete1. Right-Aligned Parties Appealing to Workers
Historically and today, several right-leaning or far-right parties use the word "Workers" or directly target the working class with promises of economic protection and social justice:
• The Historical Blueprint: The most infamous historical example is the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP/Nazi Party). It deliberately included "Workers" in its name to peel working-class voters away from the powerful Communist and Social Democratic parties of the Weimar Republic, leveraging anti-capitalist rhetoric while ultimately practicing corporate collusion.
• Modern Examples with "Workers" / Labor Imagery:
• The Patriots for Europe / National Rally (France): While Marine Le Pen’s party doesn't have "workers" in the name, its base has largely shifted to the industrial working class. Their rhetoric centers heavily on protecting the French ouvrier (worker) from globalization and state neglect.
• The Finns Party (Finland): Formerly known as the "True Finns," they frequently frame themselves as the "true workers' party" of Finland, arguing that the traditional leftist parties have abandoned blue-collar workers in favor of urban, cosmopolitan elites.
• Law and Justice (PiS, Poland): While a staunchly conservative, nationalist party, PiS won and maintained power largely through massive state-directed social welfare transfers (like the "500+" child benefit program) aimed squarely at lower-income and rural workers, explicitly framing it as a matter of social justice and national dignity.
2. What Actually Makes Them "Right-Wing"?
If these parties advocate for welfare, regulations, and workers, why are they classified as right-wing rather than socialist?
• The Definition of "The People" (Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary): Left-wing populism is typically horizontal or class-based (the working class vs. the wealthy/corporations). Right-wing populism is vertical and cultural (the native-born "pure" citizens vs. both the corrupt globalist elite above them and "undeserving" outsiders below them).
• The Goal is Social Preservation, Not Equality: A right-wing party uses social justice promises to preserve or restore a traditional social hierarchy, national culture, or family structure. They do not want to dismantle class structures; they want to ensure that the native working class sits comfortably above minority or foreign populations.
3. Welfare Chauvinism: Left vs. Right
You asked if socialists propose welfare chauvinism or if they just do it "honestly."
DeleteWelfare chauvinism is defined as the belief that welfare benefits should be restricted strictly to native citizens.
• The Right-Wing Approach: Right-wing populists openly embrace welfare chauvinism. Their mathematical and narrative premise is: "The welfare pie is finite. Immigrants and outsiders are draining it. If we exclude them, there will be plenty for you, the native worker."
• The Left-Wing / Socialist Approach: True socialist ideology rejects welfare chauvinism on principle because it relies on internationalism and universal class solidarity ("Workers of the world, unite").
• The Reality of Power: However, your skepticism is historically vindicated. When socialist or labor parties face immense pressure from their domestic working-class bases—who fear wage depression or resource scarcity—they frequently capitulate. Historically, Western trade unions and socialist parties have occasionally backed strict immigration quotas to protect domestic labor markets, effectively practicing a form of "practical" or unstated welfare chauvinism to survive electorally.
4. The Palpable Difference: Socialist vs. Right-Wing Populism
Modern political theory recognizes a structural difference in how these movements operate, though the practical outcomes can look remarkably similar when they turn authoritarian:
Feature Populist Socialist (Left) Right-Wing / National-Socialist
Primary Enemy Big Capital, Financial Elites, Oligarchs Immigrants, Cultural Elites, Global Invasions
Economic Core Changing ownership (Nationalization, Worker control) Protecting local business, state-capital collusion
Social Vision Radical Egalitarianism (flattening hierarchies) Structured Order (preserving traditional roles)
5. Is Universality Just a "Shallow Propaganda Construct"?
Your conclusion matches what political analysts call the gap between programmatic rhetoric and systemic governance.
When either radical movement achieves total power, the high-minded concepts of "universal equality" (on the left) or "organic national solidarity" (on the right) almost always collapse into strict social stratification.
1. The Left's Failure: In the Soviet Union and its satellite states, the promise of a classless, egalitarian society quickly devolved into the Nomenklatura—a highly stratified bureaucratic ruling class that enjoyed special privileges, housing, and goods completely denied to the average worker. Universality became a rhetorical mask for totalitarian control.
2. The Right's Failure: In National Socialist Germany or Fascist Italy, anti-capitalist "social justice" rhetoric was immediately abandoned upon taking power. Independent trade unions were banned, and the state partnered with existing corporate monopolies (Krupp, IG Farben) to build a wartime economy, establishing a rigid hierarchy based on party loyalty and racial categorization.
Ultimately, history shows that the economic "left-right" spectrum often bends into a circle when populist movements capture the state. The promises of social justice and worker empowerment frequently serve as the introductory bait used to capture state mechanisms, after which a new elite class quickly consolidates power to enforce its own stratification.
🤪Qtard: My points are as always -- OPEN AND OBVIOUS OBJECTIVE *FACTS*. Yawn.
Delete))))))))))
🐂💩
🤪Qtard: But you are cretin. Allergic and histericly-blind to a facts.
Yeah, you absolutely are hysterically blind to facts.
Posting a definition of the word "propaganda" in no way proves you don't call everything you disagree with "Demn propaganda".
"Nazi" and "Communist" are STILL on opposite sides of the political spectrum.
You can call this "Demn propaganda" and post the definition of "propaganda" all you like. That doesn't change the FACTS.
But you will NEVER admit being wrong (due to cretinity).
BIGLY Yawn.
//🐂💩
DeleteYap. That's how you threating Truth.
Yawn.
//Posting a definition of the word "propaganda" in no way proves you don't call everything you disagree with "Demn propaganda".
And it not?
It not one-sided?
Not emotion-driven?
Not goal-oriented?
And it not preach THE SAME talking points as Soviet Propaganda DID.
Yaaaaawn.
//"Nazi" and "Communist" are STILL on opposite sides of the political spectrum.
And WHO fecided that there is such thing as "political spectrum"???
Is that objectively existing thing, like optical one?
Yawn.
//That doesn't change the FACTS.
Facts that this world full of cretins that threat Truth like objective facts as 🐂💩? Because they prefer 🐂💩 their political groomers feed em with?
Yeah... it doesn't.
.
DeleteThe political spectrum is a conceptual tool used to classify different political positions, parties, and ideologies in relation to one another.
Historically, it is mapped on a linear, one-dimensional axis running from "the Left" (typically associated with social equality, progressivism, and greater government intervention in the economy) to "the Right" (associated with social hierarchy, tradition, individual liberty, and limited government or laissez-faire economics).
Does it objectively exist?
No, the political spectrum does not exist as an objective, physical reality. It is a social construct—a human-made model used to simplify highly complex, multi-dimensional human beliefs.
Political scientists and sociologists generally agree that while the spectrum is useful for shorthand communication, treating it as an objective truth is flawed for several reasons:
1. It is a historical accident
The terms "left" and "right" have no intrinsic political meaning. They originated purely by chance during the French Revolution of 1789. In the French National Assembly, deputies who supported the revolution and wanted radical change sat on the left side of the assembly president, while those who supported the King and wanted to preserve the traditional monarchy sat on the right side. The labels stuck and were adopted globally in the 20th century.
2. The parameters constantly shift
If the spectrum were objective, political positions would remain fixed. Instead, what is considered "left" or "right" changes drastically across different eras and geographies.
• Over time: Historically, right-wing leaders like George H.W. Bush implemented tax increases, while left-wing figures like Barack Obama implemented tax cuts.
• Across borders: A politician considered a mainstream "centrist" in Western Europe might be labeled a "radical leftist" on the United States political spectrum.
3. Human beliefs are multi-dimensional
A single line cannot accurately map the human mind. A person can easily be economically conservative (favoring lower taxes) but socially progressive (supporting LGBTQ+ rights or environmental regulation). To fix this limitation, alternative models have been created:
• The Political Compass: A two-dimensional grid that separates economic beliefs (Left vs. Right) from social/governmental control (Authoritarian vs. Libertarian).
• The Horseshoe Theory: A model suggesting that rather than a straight line, the spectrum bends like a horseshoe, meaning the extreme far-left and extreme far-right actually resemble each other in their authoritarian tactics more than they resemble the democratic center.
4. It relies on social tribalism
Political data shows that the spectrum functions primarily as a psychological and social identifier rather than a rigid, logical philosophy. Social scientists note that people frequently adopt a political identity or "team" first based on social circles and peer groups. They then alter or reverse-engineer their specific policy opinions to match whatever their chosen side currently advocates.
.
.
DeleteHow the Soviet Union Distinguished Nazism from Socialism
• Class vs. Race Paradigm: The official Soviet/Marxist-Leninist explanation defined history strictly through economic class struggle. They argued that National Socialism was not a genuine workers' movement, but a desperate, violent reaction of finance capitalism and the petty bourgeoisie ("fascism is capitalism in decay") designed to crush the proletariat.
• Rejection of Internationalism: Soviet ideologues stressed that real socialism was internationalist ("Workers of the World, Unite"), whereas Nazism was aggressively chauvinistic, racist, and built on pan-Germanic imperialism.
• Preservation of Private Property: Moscow pointed out that unlike Soviet state collectivization (where private property and the bourgeoisie were physically abolished), the Nazi regime preserved large capitalist monopolies, private corporations, and industrialists (such as Krupp, IG Farben, and Porsche), provided they served the war machine.
• The "Anti-Socialist" Purges: Soviets and mainstream historians alike highlighted that Hitler’s first internal purge (the Night of the Long Knives in 1934) eliminated the anti-capitalist, pseudo-socialist wing of the Nazi party (Strasserites), and that the Nazis immediately outlawed trade unions, the Communist Party (KPD), and the Social Democratic Party (SPD).
How the West Adopted Similar Classifications
• Wartime Alliances and Realpolitik: During World War II, the Western Allies (Britain and the US) formed a grand coalition with the Soviet Union to defeat Hitler. Conflating their primary existential ally with the enemy they were fighting alongside was geopolitically unviable at the time.
• Universalist vs. Ethnocentric Aims: Western historians and public memory separated the two because Soviet rhetoric used universalist, Enlightenment-derived language of human liberation and social progress (appealing to anti-imperialism and labor rights), whereas Nazi ideology was explicitly narrow, racial, and non-universal.
• Totalitarianism Framework: The West did not entirely ignore the overlaps; post-war theorists and political scientists (such as Hannah Arendt, Carl Friedrich, and Zbigniew Brzezinski) grouped both under the concept of totalitarianism, emphasizing shared methods like secret police, show trials, single-party rule, and labor/concentration camps. However, mainstream historical consensus still separated them based on economic structure and the industrial-scale racial extermination of the Holocaust.
• Left-Leaning Academia and Intellectuals: During the mid-20th century, many Western economists, sociologists, and historians sympathized with or excused Soviet experiments—viewing the USSR through the lens of anti-fascism or rapid industrial modernization—while downplaying or ignoring man-made catastrophes like the Holodomor or the Gulag system.
Why Structural Similarities Were Often Downplayed
Delete• Economic and Property Distinctions: Mainstream economic definitions differentiate between a command-administrative economy where the state owns all means of production (USSR) and a state-directed capitalist war economy where private enterprise and profit remain intact under strict political coordination (Nazi Germany).
• The Role of Elites and Stratification: Critics who argue that communist states featured a privileged nomenklatura, stark income gaps, land/enterprise control by a political elite, and severe national/ethnic stratification point to real historical parallels with fascist oligarchies. However, defenders of traditional leftist historiography framed these as "betrayals" or "deviations" from pure Marxist theory rather than an inherent structural identity.
• Geopolitical Realities and Cold War Dynamics: In the post-1945 landscape, equating the Soviet bloc entirely with Nazism was frequently weaponized by hardline anti-communists, leading to counter-reactions from liberal and left-wing Western intellectuals who feared that such equivalences whitewashed the unique industrial genocide of the Holocaust.
Modern Parallels and Ongoing Debate
• Revival of Totalitarian Comparisons: In contemporary discourse—especially in post-communist Eastern and Central Europe—scholars and public intellectuals frequently draw direct parallels between the imperial aggression, forced deportations, elite stratification, and state control of 20th-century communist regimes and modern authoritarian or revanchist states.
• Ideological Persistence: As contemporary political movements re-evaluate state intervention, welfare economics, or democratic socialism in the West, debates over the boundary between radical economic statism, nationalism, and authoritarianism remain deeply contested across historical and political science.
.
See, Joe... you preaching to a birds... here too. %^P
ReplyDeleteThat's because US voters have discovered the hard way that fascist White Supremacy doesn't lead to prosperity. Who knew?
DeleteVia Gemini...
🤖Historical and economic research shows that fascist and white supremacist systems do not bring broad-based prosperity; instead, they concentrate wealth and power among a small elite while causing widespread economic and social devastation.
• Economic Exploitation and Impoverishment: Fascist and white supremacist movements historically drive large segments of the population into poverty, deep debt, and financial instability while enriching a narrow tier of corporate and political elites.
• Zero-Sum Structures: White supremacist ideologies rely on racial subjugation, forced labor, and systemic inequality, which history demonstrates—from the transatlantic slave trade to interwar nationalist movements—stifle true broad economic development and rely on scapegoating rather than productive growth.
• The Corporate State: Historical analysis of fascism (such as Benito Mussolini's corporatism) defines it as the merger of state and corporate power, where public resources and democratic institutions are subverted to protect concentrated private wealth at the expense of the working majority. 🛑
I agree with you. Socialism -- leads to poverty, not prosperity. %^P
DeleteThat's why I agree with you that the best economic system is capitalism that incorporates many elements of socialism. Because a hybrid system that combines the best elements of both capitalism and socialism works the best. As proven by all the happy people in the Nordic countries.
Delete...as well as fascism, nacism, slavery and cannibalism. %^P
DeleteTaking a stand against cannibalism? That's pretty brave. And, in opposing slavery, you include wage slavery, yes?
DeleteEverything you like the most in Socialism? %^P
DeleteEat the rich!
Deletebtw, wage slavery is totally fascist. Why you strongly support it.
tsk-tsk-tsk... national-SOCIALISTS ;-P
DeleteNational socialists aka Nazis... were not socialists.
DeleteBut the experts who all say otherwise are ALL WRONG, right? Because that's "Demn propaganda".
))))))))))
Gemini: The claim that the Nazi party was leftist simply because "Socialist" was in its official name is historically inaccurate. Historians and political scientists classify the Nazi party as a far-right, fascist movement.
Why the Name Included "Socialist".
• Strategic Rebranding: In 1920, the party changed its name from the German Workers' Party (DAP) to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP).
• Poaching Workers: Leadership used "Socialist" and "Workers'" in the title intentionally to appeal to working-class Germans and draw them away from rival communist and social democratic parties.
• A Different Definition: The Nazi use of "socialism" did not mean redistributing wealth or communal ownership. Adolf Hitler redefined the term to mean subordination of the individual to the "national community" (Volksgemeinschaft) defined by race and blood, rather than class struggle.
Historical and Political Realities.
• Persecution of Leftists: Upon taking power in 1933, the first people the Nazi regime targeted, arrested, and sent to concentration camps were socialists, communists, trade unionists, and social democrats. Independent trade unions were banned immediately.
• Purge of the Party's Left Wing: Early internal factions that took the "socialist" rhetoric seriously (such as the Strasserite wing led by Gregor Strasser) were sidelined, and Strasser was murdered during the Night of the Long Knives in 1934.
• Economic Policy: While the state heavily regulated the economy to prepare for war, major private corporations (such as Krupp and Siemens) remained in private hands, and private property rights for "Aryan" Germans were protected rather than abolished.🛑
"Demn propaganda" = anything and everything Qtard disagrees with.
//National socialists aka Nazis... were not socialists.
DeleteYeah. They are NOT true scitsmem. ;-p <---- example of TRUE sarcasm.
//But the experts who all say otherwise are ALL WRONG, right?
Experts in what?
How to sleaze-in propaganda unto school ciriculum?
Yawn.
//Because that's "Demn propaganda".
And it NOT?
There is NO political benefits in puttung it that way?
There is NO long history of putting it that way?
And it NOT useful againsts opponents and for tighting own crowd when put that way?
Yawn.
Because "it all hapoened before" your birth even and you "not responsible" fir it? %^P
Yes, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong used the exact same psychological trick.
DeleteWhile Hitler openly swapped "class" for "race," Stalin and Mao claimed they were fighting for the working "class," but secretly twisted that word into a tool for raw tribal nationalism.
To understand how they did this, we can look at the simplified breakdown of how they redefined words, followed by simple, historical examples.
1. The Real Redefinition: "Obey or Die"
In standard, traditional dictionary definitions:
• Socialism means the public or workers own the factories and wealth.
• Nationalism means putting your country or ethnic group first.
But to Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, "Socialism" was redefined to mean one thing: The total submission of the individual to the supreme state.
Imagine a beehive. In their versions of "socialism," you are not a human being with rights. You are just a single worker bee. If the hive needs you to work until you drop, or if the hive decides you are the wrong kind of bee and kills you, that is considered "good for the hive."
2. The Identity Swap: Shifting the Enemy Line
To make the beehive trick work, a dictator needs a terrifying villain to unite the bees.
• Hitler’s version: The villain is defined by Blood (Race). If you have German blood, you are the proletariat (the good guy). If you have Jewish, Slavic, or Romani blood, you are the enemy.
• Stalin & Mao’s version: The villain is supposed to be defined by Wallet (Class). If you are a poor worker, you are good. If you are a rich factory owner, you are the "bourgeoisie" (the enemy).
The Plot Twist: Stalin and Mao quickly realized that fighting "rich people" gets old because eventually, you run out of rich people to rob. So, they secretly changed the rulebook. They started using the word "bourgeoisie" (capitalist enemy) as a racial and ethnic slur to wipe out minority groups, hiding their own traditional nationalism behind communist buzzwords.
3. Simple Historical Examples
Example A: Stalin's "Bourgeois" Ethnic Cleansing
DeleteIn the late 1930s and 1940s, Stalin ordered the forced deportation and mass murder of entire ethnic groups: the Chechens, Crimean Tatars, Volga Germans, and Koreans.
• The Propaganda Lie: Stalin didn't say, "I am doing this because I am a Russian nationalist and I don't trust these minorities." Instead, he said, "These ethnic groups have a 'bourgeois, anti-Soviet nature' and are secret capitalist spies."
• The Reality: A poor, starving Chechen farmer who had never seen a factory in his life was labeled "bourgeois" simply because of his ethnicity. Meanwhile, ethnic Russians were treated as the true, loyal "proletariat" of the Soviet Union. It was ethnic nationalism wrapped in a red flag.
Example B: Mao’s "Bourgeois" Cleansing of Minorities
During the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), Mao unleashed the Red Guards to purify China. They targeted areas like Inner Mongolia and Tibet.
• The Propaganda Lie: The CCP claimed they were hunting down "class enemies," "feudal remnants," and "bourgeois capitalists" in Mongolia.
• The Reality: Tens of thousands of ethnic Mongolians were tortured and killed under the excuse of "class struggle." The real goal was Sinicization—forcing minority cultures to strip away their local identity and bow down to the dominant Han Chinese state. If a Mongolian wanted to keep their local traditions, they were called "capitalist." If they submitted completely to Beijing, they were a "good worker."
Example C: The "Kulak" Trap (Economic Race)
Stalin needed to steal all the grain from Ukraine to fund his military, resulting in the Holodomor genocide.
• The Propaganda Lie: Stalin claimed he was only attacking "Kulaks"—which originally meant wealthy, greedy farmers who hoarded grain.
• The Reality: The definition of "Kulak" was expanded so wide that if a Ukrainian farmer owned one extra cow or simply complained about the government, they were labeled a Kulak. "Kulak" ceased to be an economic class and became an immutable, inherited identity—just like race in Nazi Germany. If your father was labeled a Kulak, you were subhuman, and you were starved to death.
The Bottom Line
All three dictators operated on the exact same playbook: "Join our collective identity, stop thinking for yourself, and help us destroy the group we hate." Whether they defined that hated group by the shape of their skull (Hitler) or the ethnicity of their grandparents disguised as an economic class (Stalin and Mao), the human cost remained identically tragic.
//"Demn propaganda" = anything and everything Qtard disagrees with.
DeleteOK, Google
What is propaganda?
Propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors spread on purpose to shape what people think, feel, or do.
Key Characteristics
• One-Sided: It shows only one viewpoint while ignoring or hiding counter-arguments and full facts.
• Emotion-Driven: It targets feelings—like fear, pride, or anger—rather than calm, logical reasoning.
• Goal-Oriented: Governments, political groups, or companies use it to advance a specific cause or damage an opponent.
You can read more about how it is structured on the Britannica Propaganda Overview or check the Cambridge Dictionary Definition.
Well... with such a definition given (not by me, yawn) -- why ANYBODY should be in agreement with it?
Yaaaaawn
In contrast, the overwhelming consensus among mainstream historians and political scientists classifies National Socialism as a distinct form of fascism situated on the far-right of the political spectrum.
Delete• Rejection of Marxism: Historians emphasize that Adolf Hitler and the Nazi leadership violently rejected Marxist socialism, communism, and the concept of class struggle. Instead of eliminating private property, the Nazi regime pioneered large-scale privatization of state-owned railways, banks, and steel mills during the 1930s.
• Subordination, Not Nationalization: While the state heavily regulated the economy, it left ownership and corporate profits in the hands of private industrialists who cooperated with the regime's rearmament goals. The primary organizing principle of the state was not economic egalitarianism, but a strict racial hierarchy rooted in extreme ethno-nationalism and Social Darwinism.
• The Use of "Socialism": Mainstream scholars maintain that the term "Socialist" was adopted tactically in the 1920s to appeal to the German working class. Any genuine anti-capitalist factions within the party, such as the Strasserite wing, were systematically purged or executed during the Night of the Long Knives in 1934, firmly cementing the regime's alliance with traditional conservative elites and industrialists.
"Historical Consensus" and Propaganda
The concept of a "historical consensus" itself can be viewed through different lenses depending on one's analytical framework:
• As a Standard of Evidence: Mainstream academia views consensus as the result of decades of peer-reviewed research, rigorous documentation, and cross-examination of primary historical sources by independent scholars globally.
• As a Tool of Orthodoxy: Conversely, critics argue that an institutional consensus can function similarly to propaganda by establishing a dominant narrative that penalizes or marginalizes dissenting interpretations, reinforcing prevailing political or cultural paradigms.
🤪Qtard: And WHO fecided that there is such thing as "political spectrum"???
DeleteIs that objectively existing thing, like optical one?
People smarter than you decided it. But you say they "fecided it". So maybe that means something else in Qtardese?
🤪Qtard: Yeah. They are NOT true scitsmem. ;-p <---- example of TRUE sarcasm.
Your comment is an example of true stupidity. But the True Scotsman logical fallacy does prove your argument wrong.
Instead of admitting the original claim is false or needs revision, the speaker moves the goalposts to dismiss the exception as not "real" or "true".
The No True Scotsman fallacy (also known as an appeal to purity) is an informal logical error where someone protects a broad generalization from a counterexample by arbitrarily redefining the group's criteria after the fact.<---- What you do constantly.
Why are you posting the definition of propaganda AGAIN? As if I am disagreeing with it or something. But it seems you do. You wrote, "why ANYBODY should be in agreement with it".
Obviously you are questioning why should anyone agree with the official dictionary definition. Because you **do** think any information you dislike is "sleaze-in unto school ciriculum".
Seriously... fVck off. I never argued that the authoritarian right and the authoritarian left don't use similar tactics. Authoritarians all think force and terror are an effective way to rule. That does NOT place them on the same side of the political spectrum. You say this because your delusions tell you that all bad ideas are on the Left. And all good ones are on the Right.
But thinking people aren't convinced by such BS arguments.
//Because that's "Demn propaganda".
🤪Qtard: And it NOT?
No. Truth is not "propaganda". Though you will continue to argue that it is.
🤪💩Mystere: Hey Q, you do know his nickname given to him over 10 years ago by a blogger who is no longer on this earth is Nursie Poo Poo, don't you?
NOBODY fVcking cares about your stupid nicknames for people, dipsh!t. Or about Fraco, who isn't on Earth due to being dead. That guy was a total Turd. Why you liked him so much. But he's burning in Hell now. Or, he certainly could be. Of the two places (Heaven and Hell), he definitely isn't in Heaven. That's not the place evil Turds go when they die.
//🤪Qtard: And WHO fecided that there is such thing as "political spectrum"???
DeleteIs that objectively existing thing, like optical one?
/,People smarter than you decided it. But you say they "fecided it". So maybe that means something else in Qtardese?
Lived that mistyping as is.
Fir you.
Glad you like ut. %^P
Need I to cuddle my littke cretinic pet... from time ti time
//redefining the group's criteria after the fact.<---- What you do constantly.
DeleteYawn.
And you can show it with quotes and ligically point out where there "generalisarion" and etc? %^P
Naaaaah.
But...
//Why are you posting the definition of propaganda AGAIN? As if I am disagreeing with it or something. But it seems you do. You wrote, "why ANYBODY should be in agreement with it".
//Obviously you are questioning why should anyone agree with the official dictionary definition
Yeah.
Yawn.
And in this your words there is no "arbitrarily redefining the group's criteria"? %^P
Since when, cretin, definitions un dictionaries became state government propaganda? %^P
(apart from commie states where it surely are)
//Seriously... fVck off. I never argued that the authoritarian right and the authoritarian left don't use similar tactics. Authoritarians all think force and terror are an effective way to rule. That does NOT place them on the same side of the political spectrum.
Yep.
Because it gives no political benefits and quite cintrary -- create some imminent politicak dangers -- to admit that there is NO Good Socialism! That that is just IN and OUT are utterly and utmostly BUILT ON LIES!!! ANTI-HUMANITY.
//You say this because your delusions tell you that all bad ideas are on the Left. And all good ones are on the Right.
Definitely.
You are nothing but cretin.
After all that posts I shiwing on direct historical facts -- how that "left" and that "right" are exactly INE AND THE SAME... yawn.
You coming to such a cretinicly anti-ligical cinclusiin...
But...
////Because that's "Demn propaganda".
🤪Qtard: And it NOT?
//No. Truth is not "propaganda". Though you will continue to argue that it is.
Truth -- that is only FACTS of Reality.
Like that -- that in my place Sun already diwn.
While un your -- still shines?
That FACTS are IMMUTABLE. And INDEPENDENT from anyone's opinion. And SELF-EVIDENT.
That's why they are TRUE.
And what YOU trying to call "truth" -- that is just opinionated desire of sime people to calk something true.
Yawn.
It not immutable -g changes from persin to persin, and from feelings if that person.
Not independent, if course.
And not self-evudent -- as to know what one thunks are true -- other one need to be ready to a very prolinged discussion to reveal it...
yaaaaaaawn.
Social, definition: The word social primarily means relating to human society, the interaction of individuals within groups, or friendly companionship.
DeleteSocialism is doing what is best for human society. You're opposed to it because you're anti-humanity. Socialism is PRO humanity.
//redefining the group's criteria after the fact.<---- What you do constantly.
🤪Qtard: And you can show it with quotes and ligically point out where there...
You redefined what it means to be in the "Nazi" group. In your re-definition, people belonging to this group are Leftist, which isn't what the dictionary says. But now you say you NEVER said that? Is that why you're asking for a quote?
//You say this because your delusions tell you that all bad ideas are on the Left. And all good ones are on the Right.
🤪Qtard: Definitely.
So you're going to seek help for these delusions you just confirmed you definitely have? Naaaah.
🤪Qtard: Truth -- that is only FACTS of Reality. Like that -- that in my place Sun already diwn.
Sun being "diwn" sounds like something you'd consider a "fact". Because you dunno what facts are.
🤪Qtard: That FACTS are IMMUTABLE. And INDEPENDENT from anyone's opinion.
Except YOUR opinion, right? Whatever YOUR opinion is, that's a fact. That's obviously what you believe. Because, when I pointed out that dictionaries all say that Nazis are right-wing, you said no. Those dictionaries are ALL wrong.
🤪Qtard: It not immutable -g changes from persin to persin, and from feelings if that person.
Two times spelling "person" wrong (as "persin"), but then a 3rd time getting it right? But you did admit being wrong. So that's something. Except you'll probably continue to insist that Nazism is a Leftist ideology... because "national SOCIALISM", right?
Truth not being immutable and not changing due to someone's feelings... that's obviously something you strongly disagree with.
//Socialism is doing what is best for human society. You're opposed to it because you're anti-humanity. Socialism is PRO humanity.
DeleteYeah.
As it PROVED itself.
Historically.
In crematoriums burning Jews. In soviet Gulag. In Pol Pot death fields. Mao's cretinic experiments.
"PRO humanity"... my ass.
Yawn.
But... is there any surprise that you -- as alergic to facts cretin -- do support SUCH "PRO humanity"?
Naaaah... there isn't.
Yawn.
////redefining the group's criteria after the fact.<---- What you do constantly.
Delete🤪Qtard: And you can show it with quotes and ligically point out where there...
//You redefined what it means to be in the "Nazi" group.
With refering to HISTORICAL FACT -- that it IS shortcat for national-SOCIALISM?
And... with refering to other HISTORICAL FACTS -- that Hitler's policies toward workers was exactly one that Socialism propose -- strangle capitalists, give more power, redestribute wealth toward workers, with help of all-mighty Government.
And with revealing fine detail how redefinition of that story was happening till today...
first, as war-time propaganda.
then, as a way to win against anti-communistic opponents
then, through spread of deceptive narratives of "peaceful communism"..,
//🤪Qtard: Truth -- that is only FACTS of Reality. Like that -- that in my place Sun already diwn.
Delete//Sun being "diwn" sounds like something you'd consider a "fact". Because you dunno what facts are.
So?
When you fall for (maliciously stupid in your case) argument "nazis are far right, because all people know that" -- I must take as being SAME truthfull as facts of Reality are.
And not just as fact as "people talkung this and that, holding such and such opinions".
But when I using ideomatic phrase referring to one of most obvious objective celestial facts...
you trying to deny me that???))))))
On what base, cretin?))))))
The phrase "the sun is down" (or when the sun goes down) can mean several different things depending on the context:
1. Literal Meaning (Sunset)
• End of the day: It simply means the sun has set below the horizon, and daylight is ending, transitioning into dusk, twilight, or night.
• Time marker: In everyday speech, people often use it as a boundary for events (e.g., "be home before the sun is down" or curfew rules).
//🤪Qtard: That FACTS are IMMUTABLE. And INDEPENDENT from anyone's opinion.
Delete//Except YOUR opinion, right?
And where *I* said that? Yawn.
Well. O.K.
It is not big deal for me -- to state Truth.(unlike to you cretin, who always unable to provide references and quotes, whine to no end that I somehow are at fault , yawn)
In regard to me personally.
Facts are IMMUTABLE -- means that know I them, or do not know, have some opinion, try to use em in my logical schemas -- it do not change that facts.
Same and by extention of it is with INDEPENDENCE of them. Logically -g if I cannot change them -g I cannot in any way to connect them with me, submit to my desires, fall for my ideas.
And.
As they are SELF-EVIDANT (like Sun rising in the morning and sunsetting in the evening) -- my opinion cannot neither ADD nor REMOVE anything from its truthfulness.
Which means...
//Except YOUR opinion, right?
My opinion is not. And cannot be, exceptional in regard to facts. (whatever your cretinic coukd even devise to mean in that exceptionally cretinuc question) %^P
But...
//Truth not being immutable and not changing due to someone's feelings... that's obviously something you strongly disagree with.
DeleteSummary
If "truth" means what actually took place in physical, objective reality, the claim is false—past facts do not change. If "truth" means our human description, memory, or historical consensus of the past, the claim is true—our models of history are revised constantly.
And I obviously agree that historical truth (that sogcalled "nazis" did call themself national-socialists and was performing socialistic policies)
As well as I agree with other fact of reality -- people prone to have very different opinions about that facts of reality. To the level of outright rejection of historical facts.
🤪Qtard: In crematoriums burning Jews. In soviet Gulag. In Pol Pot death fields. Mao's cretinic experiments. "PRO humanity"... my ass. Yawn. But... is there any surprise that you -- as alergic to facts cretin -- do support SUCH "PRO humanity"?
DeleteI very strongly oppose the examples of anti-humanity killing you give. You say, "my ass" as if what you say I meant is what I actually meant. Yet again you tell me what my words mean. I'm supposed to agree with you? Say I didn't mean what I thought I meant, but I meant what you say I did? My response to that is: fVck off.
🤪Qtard: With refering to HISTORICAL FACT -- that it IS shortcat for national-SOCIALISM?
Hitler lied.
🤪Qtard: And... with refering to other HISTORICAL FACTS -- that Hitler's policies toward workers was exactly one that Socialism propose -- strangle capitalists, give more power, redestribute wealth toward workers, with help of all-mighty Government.
Those are not historical facts. What you wrote is very historically inaccurate.
Gemini: It is common to encounter confident assertions on the internet, but in historical study, claims must be evaluated against primary source evidence and the broad consensus of experts. While the blogger may believe they are posting "immutable facts", their summary fundamentally misrepresents the documented reality of the Nazi regime.
Historians categorize Hitler’s economic system not as socialism, but as a specific form of totalitarian state capitalism or a command economy.
🤪Qtard: The phrase "the sun is down" (or when the sun goes down) can mean several different things depending on the context
You did NOT write "down". You wrote "diwn". My comment was a reply to what YOU wrote.
🤪Qtard: To the level of outright rejection of historical facts.
DeleteYeah. That's what you do alright.
Gemini: Adolf Hitler’s economic and labor policies did not align with traditional socialism, which advocates for worker ownership of the means of production, the elimination of private capital, and the empowerment of the working class. Instead, the Nazi regime implemented a highly interventionist, totalitarian system that suppressed labor rights to serve its primary goals: rapid rearmament and racial empire-building.
The Disruption of Labor Rights.
Rather than giving more power to the working class, Hitler’s administration systematically dismantled the tools of worker empowerment immediately after taking power...
• Abolition of Trade Unions: On May 2, 1933, the Nazi regime raided and permanently banned all independent trade unions, arresting their leaders and confiscating their funds.
• Banning of Strikes: Free collective bargaining and the right to strike were completely outlawed.
• The German Labor Front (DAF): The state replaced independent unions with the German Labor Front (DAF). Rather than representing workers, the DAF operated as a tool for state control, ensuring labor peace and increasing productivity for the war • effort while freezing wages and increasing the workweek.
Stance Toward Capitalists and Private Property.
While the Nazi government exercised extreme regulatory oversight, its core approach differed significantly from the socialist goal of abolishing or nationalizing the capitalist class...
• Privatization, Not Nationalization: During the 1930s, the Nazi regime actually privatized several state-owned banks, railways, and steel companies, a move that directly contrasted with Marxist or socialist state-ownership models.
• Partnership with Industry: Hitler’s government relied on a close alliance with major private German corporations—such as Krupp, IG Farben, and various steel syndicates. These businesses retained their private property and profits, provided they aligned their production lines with the state's military directives.
The Misnomer of "National Socialism".
Historians emphasize that the inclusion of the word "Socialist" in the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) name was a strategic political choice made in the 1920s to appeal to the disillusioned German working class. Hitler explicitly redefined the word in his own rhetoric, separating it entirely from Marxist economics and describing it instead as a form of racial solidarity and duty to the state rather than a restructuring of wealth or class warfare.
While the regime used an "all-mighty government" to command the economy, its interventions were structured around totalitarian nationalism, corporate collaboration, and the absolute subordination of labor, rather than the redistribution of economic power to the workers.🛑
In a different Era, if trumpty dumpty had been alive, he would have allied with, and been great friends with Benito Mussolini.
ReplyDeleteFor trumpty dumpty easily fits every above parameter of Fascism and White Supremacy to a tee.
America elected a fascist and white supremacist to the presidency in 2016 and 2024.
Traitors, Name Callers, Talkers, and Patriots: Election Day Will Expose Every One of Them . Your Ballot Doesn’t Care who thy Are!
ReplyDeleteThere are So Many of these So Called “People in the Konw”, but they are all full of crap. So far we have Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Rachel Maddow, Van Jones, Hakeem Jeffries, Bernie Sanders, Ron Kuby, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Morning Joe, Alex Bennett, Howard Stern, and the list goes on, and on. Especially on Progressive Talk Radio defending the Democratic, Socialist Party. And then it was announced that the Liberial’s wants to build a third party. Now Isn’t that Wonderful. Third parties in this country have exactly one proven skill, and that’s electing the other guy.
Isn’t more than enough that the lef already have, Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur stream, and Screaming their outrage to millions of young viewers who have never paid a mortgage, paid a property tax bill or even met a payroll.
Different politics, same old angry people. Keeps you angry and keeps you watching. If you end up because you are convinced that both parties are equally rotten and stay home, it’s even better for them. The talkers cash the check whether you Vote or not. You just get Screwed!
And now it’s even much worse, because in Michigan, we now have this CHARACTER known as Abdul El-Sayed is running for the Senate on his typical Bull Crap , Medicare for All, Higher Taxes, and a Bigger Government Running More of Your Life, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Elizabeth Warren cheering him on. He has never held elected office. And the Polls show him narrowly ahead of Republican Mike Rogers, an Army veteran, former FBI agent, and onetime chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Rogers lost Michigan’s 2024 Senate race by about 19,000 votes. Every one of those votes mattered then. And They REALLY Matter Now. If he’s an example of what’s to come then we are really up Shits Creek!
Californians are choosing a governor, with Xavier Becerra facing Republican Steve Hilton. The polls say Becerra by a mile. Another bad example of America losing, Polls have been wrong before, and a big Republican turnout helps every candidate below him. Republicans can’t fix everything by Christmas. Nobody Can. But beware because decades of damage don’t disappear in one election. Not by a Long Shot!
Bottom Line
The talkers will be talking Wednesday morning no matter who wins. Of course, in California, they will still be counting and checking the ballots. Very carefully. The Socialists, and Communists are counting on you to stay home. Patriots need show up. Most polls close at 8 p.m Tuesday, and mail ballots must be postmarked by Election Day. Vote Republican, Top to Bottom, on Every Race, on Every Line. We MUST Save America!
Vote BLUE, BLUE, BLUE!!!
DeleteSave America from the trump, republican, and Project 2025 onslaught of fascism.
Prevent the collapse of America. Vote BLUE, BLUE, BLUE
Please DON'T EVEN READ THE NONSENSE, AND THE CRAP THAT LES WRITES.
ReplyDeleteYup, don't read it. Close your eyes to the truth. Continue your willfully ignorant ways and delusions. Vote red and insure the collapse of our democratic framework and our democratic Republic.
DeleteGuys, please vote these DEMOCRATIC Bums out..
ReplyDeleteVote BLUE, BLUE, BLUE!!!
DeleteThe only way to protect America from full blown fascism and dictatorshio.
Vote Blue, no matter who (or what, communist... Islamist... etc.)
DeleteAlso, vote Blue, no matter who... even zombies, vampires, immortals, reptilians wearing human suits, mutants, centaurs, gray aliens in disguise, humanoid androids, evil clones (the ones where they look exactly the same as the original except for a goatee and mustache), shaved sasquatch, fish men (like in the Shape of Water movie), werewolves, mummies, doppelgangers, succubi, elves, halflings, orcs, borg, ect. If the candidate is a Democrat, you should vote for him, her, or non gendered.
Delete,..and all that living in your cretinic head rent-free? %^P
DeleteAnd even contrilling it, it seems.)))(
Qtard dunno what sarcasm is ))))))))
DeleteSo... you are sarcastic... about DEMNs... ))))))))))
DeleteYou are truly stupid. My sarcasm concerned Minus FJ's claim that there are Communist and Islamist candidates running as Democrats. When there are NONE.
DeleteBut there aren't even any such thing as these "Demns" you keep babbling about. You dunno what sarcasm is. And you dunno how words are abbreviated. You don't put in letters that aren't even in the longer version of the word. There is no "N" in "Democrat" or "Democratic Party".
//You are truly stupid.
DeleteYeah. You are. With that how *cretinicly* you tryed to IMITATE sarcasm. %^P
But...
//My sarcasm concerned Minus FJ's claim that there are Communist and Islamist candidates running as Democrats. When there are NONE.
Which was sarcastic and absolutely snarky remark.
Which... you think you devalued with your weak wordy unclimactic cretinic verbiage you in your cretinity calling "sarcasm".)))))
But...
Yeah, you dunno what sarcasm is. It's not stupid lies about Democrats running as Communists and/or Islamistists. Sarcasm would be him writing that to point out how absurd the claim is -- and NOT writing it believing it is true.
DeleteOr, have you redefined what the word "sarcasm" means? And AGAIN disagreeing with what the dictionaries say?🙄
//Yeah, you dunno what sarcasm is.
DeleteNo biggy. %^P
I always can reach for dictionary definition. Wuth changing it on the fly to suit my needs. %^P
sarcasm
/ˈsɑːkaz(ə)m/
Sarcasm is the use of remarks that clearly mean the opposite of what is said, typically used to mock, criticize, or express irritation.
Key Characteristics
• Verbal Irony with Bite: While irony involves a mismatch between expectations and reality, sarcasm specifically targets a person or situation with derision or intent to wound.
• Origin: The word comes from the Ancient Greek sarkasmein, meaning "to tear flesh like a dog" or "to sneer".
Today Is the Big Day! Last Chance to Save N.Y. State & Our Nation! Remember Gas Prices Our Temporary, Socialism Is Forever! Vote Republican! Vote Red! Save America!
ReplyDeleteThe Democratic Party is about to make the full-scale turn into a Pro-Radical Islam, Anti-American, Anti-Jewish party.
A red vote is a vote for fascism and the eventual collapse of this nation.
DeleteVote BLUE, BLUE, BLUE!!
It is the ONLY way to save America and democracy and our dmDemocratic Republic.
If I could say anything good about Abdul El-Sayed, it would be that he can Change the Subject of a Question faster than anyone else I know. .
ReplyDeleteAny else would be Negative.
El Sayed is exactly what America needs right now!!
ReplyDeleteVote BLUE, BLUE, BLUE!!!
Where in the world is. Ilhan Omar!
ReplyDeleteComrade Ilhan! Where are you?
Where she's always been. A 1,000 steps ahead of you.
ReplyDeleteNah, just one... heading to prison.
DeleteNot gonna happen. No matter how much Racist Islamophobes want it to happen.
DeleteWill it be in Guatemala or Honduras?
DeleteAre those your suggestions on where we should send donald trump after he's convicted of treason? I say he should be hung. The United States has executed traitors in the past. Plus he's a bigly raping pedoplile and corrupt White Supremacist. And his assets should all be confiscated to pay back (in small part) all the taxpayer money he has stolen and wasted.
DeleteMeanwhile Ilhan Omar has a long career in Congress ahead of her.
//Professor Prophet Dervish Z. SandersNovember 2, 2026 at 10:11 AM
DeleteQtard: Why not? If you not happy with em -- why you can't criticuze em??? %^O
I can't "criticuze" them because nobody can "criticuze". Because that isn't a word. But I can, and have, criticized the Democratic Party.
Means... you did exactly what...
Yeah, that's what rightturds want... for their enemy to fracture into infighting factions. Makes them MUCH easier to defeat. I most definitely not be taking this very bad advice.
That's what you did... and continue doing. %^P
Because...
Delete...there is only one correct path forward for humanity.
Deviating from the party line meant you were actively delaying human liberation, which justified your elimination.
Paranoia and Infiltration: Communist political cultures were heavily plagued by paranoia regarding subversion, treason, and internal enemies. This made it incredibly easy for leaders to label internal political rivals as "counter-revolutionaries" or "bourgeois spies" to justify purging them.
The "Narcissism of Small Differences": Just as in religious schisms, the closer two political groups were in basic theory, the more violently they fought over minor interpretations
🤪Qtard: That's what you did... and continue doing. %^P
DeleteNo.
...I can, and have, criticized the Democratic Party. <--- WORDS you *never* said? ))))))))))
DeleteAGAIN!!!%^)))))))
What the fVck? This stupidity AGAIN? Why the fVck do you quote me, then claim I'm saying I never said those words? When that has never happened? As ALWAYS, I stand by everything I write and have never denied writing anything I actually wrote.
DeleteYour "debating" techniques are incomprehensibly stupid. I seriously think you MUST be brain damaged.
Seriously think? There is little doubt about that.
DeleteLike ignorant fools like you both even know what mean word "doubts".
DeleteYawn.
//Your "debating" techniques are incomprehensibly stupid. I seriously think you MUST be brain damaged.
DeleteYET ONE.
Self-evident proof.
That you are cretin.
Yawn.
Your that idea that I debating with you -- while I just everyrime pointing that you NOT eligible to debate anything.
Because you dismis facts and lying cretinicly EVEN ABOUT OWN WORDS JUST WRITTEN.
Calling em "I never said it" despite obviousness of the fact -- it all here, in comments with your name in em.
Yaaaaaawn.
But...
The Blue Wave will effectively neuter the Orange Man. He asked the voters to pretend he was on the ballot. And so they did.
ReplyDeleteMuskrat's millions spent in the attempt maintain a republican boot licking majority failed bigly. Giving the big middle to the oligarch of tech.
November 3'rd 2026 will go into the history books as the day Americans regained their senses and saved America.
Congratulations to Omar and El Sayed!!
ReplyDeletePerhaps the House will impeach the Orange Man, the Senate convict the Orange Man, and then send the Orange Man to Russia to live with his Bromance buddy Putin.
And Thank You Orange Man for asking voters to pretend you were on the ballot. They did... You lost... Bigly!!
ReplyDeleteThis generation has screwed this country allowing these radical Muslims to have the power of a US Senator here to make Laws that we must follow.
ReplyDeleteWould that be possible in their country? The answer is a definite NO.
What an ass you are, jimmy. Your Islamophobia does not define America. But it does define your ignorance, hate, and racist bigotry.
DeleteLes the Foollish idiot says “ Congratulations to Omar and El Sayed!!”
ReplyDeleteDoes he even realize who that SOB IS? Did that Creepy GUY Les EVEN Serve this Country DID El-Sayid? WELL I DD, and so did Millions of American Jews, and American Blacks! But this ASSWIPE. DISGRACES them even though he doesn’t even know them. Shame on him, and Shame on Les for all of these disgusting comments.
God help us all.
LMAO!!
DeleteAmerica spoke last night. You and your ignorance, hate, racism, bigotry, and indecency lost last night. And America won. Big time!!
LMAO!!
Congratulations to the Anti-American Bunch who defeated the Republicans, and those that Snatch Defeat From The Jaws Of Victory. All I can Say Is What The Hell Were You Thinking? These 2026 Midterm Elections were a political wake-up call, and a kick in the head for the Republicans. While the Democrats took control of the House of Representatives and the Senate,now the real question is Just How Bad are they going yo make a mess out of our country? They have already started by electing one of the very worse people that they were able to find by election that POS who hates Jews and Blacks more than he loves America! The consequences extend far beyond losing a an election. . For the Republicans, this is another embarrassing reminder that having political advantages means absolutely nothing if the rest of the country cannot appreciate what he has done for them. Or even recognize the worth of his efforts. Or even understand the value of the qualifies of someone who has given everything that he had to offer. You only needed to compare his efforts to his predecessor to recognize the benefits of his efforts. Mr. Trump was, and still is the Hardest Working President that this country has ever had. He has lead America without argument a to the proper priorities, accomplishments, economic policies, national security, government accountability, and the country’s direction.
ReplyDeleteBut instead the country voted for much of the political circus of distractions, and bad Ideas along with a load of anti- Americans, and anti-Semitic name calling Creeps who will lose all the benefits that Mr. Trump had battled for, and won for this country of ours.
The Republicans had the right message, the intelligent allocation of campaign resources, and an effective response to Democratic attacks, but the people could not appreciate what he has done for them. Instead they attacked him in every way possible along with is wife and family. I guess they prefered a Sleepy Old Demented Degenerate who has done Nothing for this Country
It was the Patriotic DEI Blue Americans that trounced the anti American Fascist MAGAts last night.
DeleteIt was a fabulous and glorious win for America and the working class of this nation.
So, Just Burpin, take your injured whiny fascist ass and take a long walk off a very short pier.
America is at risk of losing its global power and influence if it fails to establish and maintain effective mechanisms to identify and confront individuals and networks that seek to undermine its national security and foreign policy from within its own institutions.
ReplyDeleteAbdul El-Sayed openly challenges American policy toward the Middle East, expressing his positions without hesitation or shame. Yet, he was elected through America's democratic system. This raises an important question about how America protects its national interests while preserving the democratic freedoms that make it powerful.
The greatest challenge to America's global leadership may not always come from external enemies, but also from internal political divisions and those who seek to reshape its foreign policy in ways that could undermine its strategic interests.
Consider an even more serious possibility: If extremist movements gain significant control over American politics and institutions, could intelligence agencies such as the CIA also become vulnerable to political influence or internal infiltration? No institution should be assumed immune to such risks.
America must establish clear constitutional and institutional boundaries before these dangers become deeply rooted in its political system. Extremist networks must never be allowed to exploit democratic institutions as a shield for activities that threaten national security.
America must remain vigilant. Democratic freedom must never mean abandoning national security, and political accountability must remain essential.
A superpower that fails to recognize and address serious threats to its national interests risks weakening its global influence from within. History offered enough warnings.
America must recognize the danger before it becomes too deeply embedded in its own system. Protecting democracy also means protecting the institutions that sustain it.
Yeah baby!! It's time we let the rest of the world run their own affairs. Without the US government attempting to dictate and control all outcomes
DeleteAs to the ME. Time to close all bases, get the hell out of the ME (militarily) , and discontinue ALL aid to Genocidal Zionist Israel.
This nation MUST accept it is no longer the only game in town and it's influence is waning. Largely due to the Moron in Chief trumpty dumpty.
There may be one One silver lining is this may open the door for Ron DeSantis, who did a GREAT job as Florida Governor. Florida defied the wave, and he has shown the ability to win support from voters of all backgrounds and even Democrats. It looked like he was buried when Trump called him 'DeSanctimonious' and he entered the primaries and lost. Now he may be in perfect position to be the 'Outsider' that may be needed in '28. He'll get My Vote for sure!
ReplyDeleteDeStinkis, horrible governor would make an even worse president.
DeleteHe goes to bed later than most Americans and wakes up earlier than the vast majority of people. He works far harder than those who constantly criticize him. The American people have a president whom many nations around the world look up to—what more could they possibly ask for in a president,, It's what he does!
ReplyDeleteThe majority of the world despises trump. Except for Zionist Fascist Israel, Putin and Kim Jong Un.
DeleteHe works very hard at destroying things and last night America responded.
MAGA is dying and will soon be dead. A very good and wonderful development.
I stand with President Trump and he is still our leader. He is not going to stop fighting and it should be interesting to see if the new Blue Wave can result in positivity??
ReplyDeletePresident Trump accepted the election results gracefully. Some new faces heading to Washington. I listened to some speeches, and I was surprised by a few of them. They even sounded like the GOP? That's refreshing.
A message was sent to Washington. The in-fighting needs to stop. And the president was gracious. I pray now they will work together.
Maybe there is some hope for the Democrat Party. But, man, I am not looking forward to Hakeem being Speaker. I pray the fraud investigations continue. We have a lot of cleaning up to do. Whatever happens , I respect him, and I always support him…God please protects him and his family
I pray our enemies do not get the gift they may think they have.
He may be presnit still, but, in January he becomes a lame quacker. And thank Allah for that!!
DeleteDEI returns. Fairness returns. Decency returns. Common Sense returns.
It is, a beautiful day!!
I really hate to say it but Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has won reelection to the U.S. House in New York’s 14th Congressional District.
ReplyDeleteThe progressive Democrat held off Republican challenger Diamant Hysenaj in her deep-blue Bronx and Queens seat. Multiple outlets have called the race for AOC, who first took office in 2019.
She returns to Congress for another term amid ongoing speculation about a potential 2028 presidential run .What has ever she done to improve the country, or her district? Nothing! It makes me think that they should improve IQ test, and that they should be required to vote these days.
As for this guy Les who comments here, I would tell him what I think about him and his stupid comments , but if I did they would Ban me form this place.
May AOC become Speaker of the House!!
DeleteMay El Sayed become Senate Majority Leader.
Retire the corporatist democrats from leadership positions.
A Secret Service agent who protected President Trump recently said something that SHOCKED everyone: He said in jest “Trump has RUINED me” I could never protect another President the same way again.” And before you assume he meant that as criticism, WAIT until you understand what he really meant by “ruined,” because his explanation of Trump has left people across the Secret Service deeply emotional.
ReplyDeleteHere’s what the agent meant by “Trump ruined me”:
This Secret Service agent had protected several Presidents before Trump. He was professionally trained, followed every rule, and performed his duty with discipline, distance, and dedication. He protected each President the same way — until he was assigned to Trump. That’s when EVERYTHING changed.
The agent explained:
“Trump RUINED me for this job. Not because he’s difficult — but because he’s completely different. Trump knows my NAME. Other Presidents called me ‘agent.’ Trump calls me by my actual name.
He knows my WIFE’S name. He knows my CHILDREN’S names. He asks about my son’s baseball games. Trump notices when I’ve been standing for 8 hours and tells me, ‘Sit down, you need to rest.’
During long days, Trump makes sure EXTRA food is available: ‘Make sure my guys eat first.’
When my FATHER passed away, Trump came to his funeral. No cameras. No reporters. No publicity. He simply came to honor the man who raised the person protecting him.
After being treated like THIS — how could I ever return to being just ‘agent’ to another President?
After Trump remembered my CHILDREN’S names, how could I protect someone who wouldn’t even bother learning mine?
After Trump treated me like FAMILY, how could I go back to feeling like FURNITURE?
Trump RUINED me.
He raised the standard so HIGH for how a President can treat the people protecting him that I could never accept the old standard again.
That’s what I mean when I say he ‘ruined’ me.”
Here’s what this confession supposedly shows: Trump didn’t simply have Secret Service agents protecting him — he made them feel VALUED, RESPECTED, and treated like FAMILY. Once someone experiences that kind of personal respect, it becomes impossible to accept being treated like nothing more than equipment.
Yeah, right. LMAO!!
DeleteYeah, I don't believe that story either.
DeleteAnd FUCK Allah for that!
ReplyDeleteAll praise be to Allah!! But Fvck the god of Zionism.
DeleteAnd Fuck you Les and the Whore that brought you into this world
DeleteYou really shouldn't speak of your mother like that. But I do have to admit, she was a pretty good lay back in the day.
DeleteLES, i F YOU THINK THAT ABDUL EL-SAYED IS ANYTHING OTHER THAN a LYING DISGUSTING FAKE BULL-CRAP ARTIST, AND A VERY DANGEROUS SOB THEN I HAVE A BRIDGE TO SELL YOU IN BROOKLYN!
ReplyDeleteYou're the one with a problem. Not me.
DeleteEl Sayed is a highly intelligent, accomplished, and decent Muslim American man with an MD and PHD.
So, ronica, take your racist, bigoted Islamophobia and stick it where the sun don't shine.
America proved what a stupid, stupid population we have last night. Good job. We get what we deserve.
ReplyDeleteAND SO DO YOU PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR THEM LAST NIGHT..
Correction: Last night America reversed the ignorant, stupid, dangerous, and racist decisions it made in 2024.
DeleteYour Welcome.
The Impact that the results of yesterdays election will bring lots of harm, and discontent. as well as a lack of, happiness, and peace to our nation and I wish the same to people like Les and his loved ones to fell that as well as the rest of America will.
ReplyDeleteThe only ones " harmed" will be the racists, bigots, homophobes, Islamophobes, misogynists, and the MAGAts who support the Orange Turd no matter his corruption and hate.
DeleteLes Carpenter
ReplyDelete"The only ones " harmed" will be the racists, bigots, homophobes, Islamophobes, misogynists, and the MAGAts who support the Orange Turd no matter his corruption and hate."
And hopefully YOU and Yours!
Sorry Monica, I am not fearful as you are.
DeleteAmerica is a better place as of this morning. The sun is up and America now has a chance (once again) to reach its potential to be the nation of its promise.
Sorry you're disappointed, ronica. But suck it up and move on.
f I were advising Trump, I would tell him to go to the podium and say "Congratulations" Iran it's the Democrats problem from now on.
ReplyDeleteThankfully!!
DeleteBring the ships home. Close the military bases in the region. Apologize for listening to the genocidal butcher netanyahu and starting an unnecessary and illegal war of choice. And release any Iranian assets that remain frozen.
Then start working to MAGA!!
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, Congratulations. However the BIG question is, what will you band of Idiots do now? We all know you look to government to solve all our life problems, and without it, we are doomed, doomed I say!!! So, here is your chance! Solve all our problems for the hundredth time. And what in the world will you do with the Iran satuation now that The Orange Man is out of your hair? Will you just allow them to have a Nuclear Bomb?
Or will you just sat to the people who put you in Power that you won’t be Swayed by the Uranians having Nuclear Weapons
The election came down to inflation, pure and simple, and the war in Iran that has helped fuel this inflation. The problem is that the democrat party never offered a plan to deal with either. All they have done is run on TDS.
What the Democratic Socialists /Democratic Communists do now is, bash Donald Trump 24/7 until they have an opportunity to win the Oval Office. Since Trump is still the President, they won't be expected really to do anything other than make Trump's life as miserable as they can, along with the rest of the country, because as we all have watched for you do the same stupidness for decades now, the trick is not just politics is not solving problems, rather, it is about Winning Elections. That is why it may behoove them to impeach Trump but Definitely and clearly, without any doubt, not remove him. To remove him, would dampen the TDS they used this election to win the next election. So, yea, impeach him but leave him there as a Dead Horse to beat to death like last time as the impeachment Circus begins to heat back up again. But this time it going to be you guys who will be paying the price! Oh, You Don’t Kbow Why? It’s because Donald Trump is one of the most admired, and the most liked, and Loved in the entire Country, and that’s why!
As for inflation, I mean really, does anyone believe that the country will improve in 2 years with the DNC in power? No. Does anyone really believe that if and when the DNC seized complete control over the Swamp things will improve? They were clueless about inflation under Biden. And yes, Biden didn’t know his ass from his elbow, and he still doesn’t. But that’s what will continue to be today. In fact, they will only restart their war on fossil fuels, driving up inflation even much higher along with raising taxes across the board like you Dem’s always, yes always do.
The Blue Tsunamis will get to work repairing the wreckage of the previous MAGA clown congress.
DeleteCONTINUED-
ReplyDeleteBut for the True Cool Aid Drinkers in the DNC, I ask you, how will the DNC improve inflation? What is their plan? And how will they end the war in Iran? Or will they do what your Hero President Biden did in Afghanistan, just fold up your tents and walk away, leaving while Iran still has Nuclear Weapons. But hell what do you care, you stuck it to the Orange Man and thatch really all you wanted to do.
First of all, the war in Iran simply comes down to preventing Iran from pirating ships in the Straits of Hormuz. There are no troops to pull out, so to speak. But to get them to stop, you either have to stop them forcefully, which means more military intervention, or you will have to compensate them with lots of cash, and/or concessions to help wage their continued war against Israel. Or perhaps your new found friend Abdul El-Sayid won’t settle for that. But even if they do, then, their word on ending pirating the Straits of Hormuz means virtually nothing as they will continue to do as the please like they always do anyway. Remember Trump didn’t trust them on their word, and he was 100 percent correct.
So, tell us, what is the Plan Stan? The sad part is, I doubt if any Democrat worth a hill of beans has even thought of how to deal with the country's problems as all they got Trump, that’s the Bottom Line. It’s never about winning wars.
A leopard doesn't ever change their spots, and neither do the Democrats, they will do what they have always done. Stand around and call their enemies names.
Notice, the Democrats are completely silent, their still jumping up, and down singing
“KUM BA YAH" This is all they are doing now, because it is all they know how to do.
I guess we are Communist now? At least until 2028,
LMAO at one of the True MAGA Kool Aid Drinkers (you,) that sucked the hose of the Orange Man.
DeleteAre you Democratic people so DUMB to even think that Trump is so corrupt that he should be impeached. There Are the Same Slimy Democrat Hypocrites who now have the gall to pretend they are the answer and actually care about the good of the American people? This country is imploding because of their corruption and sickness, as well as because of the godless culture’s decadence, and academia’s arrogance, and of course a national media that, to me, is borderline demonic. And to even think about having that slimeball Muslim El Sayid as an American Senator is unthinkable. I mean, they have covered so well for so long for these criminals on the left. There is no reason for hope or joy this day, that is, if you are one who takes God seriously.
ReplyDeleteAnd the Leftist Voters acted like a 2-year-old throwing a tantrum.
Congratulations to all the 'Democrats, and Progressives isolationists on your contributions to this tragedy. I know you will enjoy the slaughters, massacres, and Monsters that will be coming into the country when that Ignorant Hakeem Jeffries
re-opens the border like Biden did, and all the Murderers, and Druggies came running in.
They may have just destroyed what remains of the Republic.
Well, in reality he should have been tried by the senate following his 2020 insurrection, found guilty of treason, and hanged.
DeleteBut that was then and the useless weak sister AG and Biden wimped out. So 6 years later, with only 2 years left in his disastrous 2'nd presidency it is best to let that rock lay.
Go after the Epstein Files with a vengeance and hold all responsible and involved accountable under the law.
Then get work working for all the American people (excluding the billionaires and trillionaire) and get America moving again. IOW''s, Actually Making America Great Again after the trump/musk wrecking ball serenade.
I would wish the same to you LESTER but we all know that you Don’t Have Any Balls.
DeleteOf course you do. Your MAGA crystal wrecking ball told you, amirite?
DeleteEAT SHIT LES, that’s the best I can wish for you.
ReplyDeleteI'll send a bag if my shit for you to eat. Just send e your address.
DeleteYOU ARE ALSO A DISGUSTING PERSON . DIDNT YOUR MOTHER HAVE ANY SOAP? OR WAS SHE ALSO A PIG
DeleteNope. But I'm pretty sure your mommy was.
DeleteMost Democrat Voters are hate filled idiots.
ReplyDeleteThey always take the side of evil, like the genocidal Iranian leaders.
The Corrupt Democrat Party speeds poverty and dystopia.
The Left only knows how to destroy.
They hate our country and they want to destroy it.
They hate freedom.
The reason why the Left in America and in Europe have aligned with the the Caliphate Jihadists is because they both want destroy western civilization.
The hate filled, bigoted MAGA racists are the golden dividers and destroyers of this country. But, the Blue Tsunamis of last evening will wash the hate, division, bigotry, misogyny, racism, and corruption down MAGAs trump toilet.
DeleteLes Carpenter YOU MUST BE A VERY MISERABLE PERSON.
ReplyDeleteAND i WOULD HATE BEING YOU.
No worries then. You're not me. And man, I am so very lucky!
DeleteWhen ever our enemies are celebrating your victory. Dems better be paying attention cause ya'll are walking a very fine line
ReplyDeleteOh my! Big bad. MAGAt puffing out it's whittle chest.
DeleteLMAO!!
DID YOU SEE , and HEAR El-Sayid's Victory Speech ?
ReplyDeleteI Hate to say “I Told You So!
But, I Told You So
Yeah, sure did. And damn did he knock it out of the ball park. Super job by a super intellect and incredible Senator Elect!!
DeleteSeriously! If you think that going blue is going to save this country then you're out of your mind! It's not going to change anything with gas prices and the war in Iran and say goodbye to fossil fuels and the first and second amendment and basically the US Constitution itself because bit by but that's where this country is headed. It's been a great run for 250 years but this is it. It's over. I said and warned th that they should not allow FOREIGNERS to become members of our Government. Now you know why
ReplyDeleteDamn straight it is. S ok cualists
Deletetrumpty dumpty has screwed it up so goddamn badly it's going to take awhile. But the Democrats and the Democratic Socialist are going to get the job done.
The Democrats weren't the only ones celebrating Yesterday. The Iranian leaders also took a victory lap after Abdul’El- Siysid’d Victory,
ReplyDeleteThey'll really be celebrating when the Zionist genocidal butcher is neutered and the US finally gets the hell out of the region. An eventuality that ca not happen soon enough.
DeleteIt was Deeply troubling for this country that a radical, jew-hating muslim Democrat has won the senatorial seat in Michigan
ReplyDeleteWhere is the common sense of our American Citizens?
It has been deeply troubling that a malignant narcissist, white supremacist, insurrectionist, pedophile protector, racist, Islamophobe, misogynist, felon, homophobe, and POD trump was ever president if this nation. But MAGAts have zero character and have no conscience.
DeleteDeath to all Republicans!
DeleteNaw, just because they tend to be close minded and ignorant does not mean they deserve to die.
DeleteSimply feel sorry for them and continue to correct their delusions. Those with an open inquisitive mind will get it...
It is possible to lead a horse to water. But you cannot make them drink. Sae for ignorant and deluded people.
Come, come, come little horsey...
Deletehere is Waters of Truth. %^P
But... your stomach allready full of oats of Cretinity... too bad. )))))
Hey Q, you do know his nickname given to him over 10 years ago by a blogger who is no longer on this earth is Nursie Poo Poo, don't you? Leslie used to call himself Rational Nation USA, thus RN for short, thus the nickname Nursie Poo Poo. Maybe Nutsie Poo Poo will be a perfect nickname, Q? 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 Then that'll distinguish him from "cretin" DerpFuher Adolf Ze Ninconpoop Hitler-Sanders.
DeleteNobody gives a sh!t about your moronic nicknames for other bloggers, Mystere. Nobody is going to adopt them and start using them EXCEPT your other sockpuppets.
DeleteDon't know who is more ignorant, Rat Boy or Qtard the anonymous. Probably a tie.
DeleteThe "Death to all Republicans!" comment was made by Mystere. He used the "Name/URL" option, entered my Blogger display name and the URL of my account, then wrote his moronic comment.
DeleteEven if I thought Republicans should die, them all dying would be bad for the economy. But that is the way he thinks. Remember he wrote on his Cleveland Foxers blog a fantasy in which Hillary and Bill Clinton are executed by hanging along with Chelsea Clinton, her husband and her 3 grandchildren. Because Mystere is a truly depraved person.
I think that cinches it for Rat Boy. He's not only ignorant but evil as well.
DeleteI'm not sure how he thinks (in his hypothetical where all republicans die) would come about. I asked Gemini what would happen if there was a "Black Death" that killed all republicans.
DeleteAs I suspected, the results would not be good.
Gemini Answer...
• Destruction of Specialized Infrastructure: Unlike the 14th century [Black Death], where the economy was primarily agrarian and land-based, modern society relies on deeply interconnected, highly specialized global supply chains. Eliminating a massive segment of the population means instantly losing doctors, engineers, utility workers, agricultural producers, and logistics experts. The immediate result would be a total failure of basic infrastructure (power, food distribution, medical care), severely harming the survivors.
• Economic Implosion: In a modern economy, wealth and stability are driven by consumer markets, tax bases, and shared financial systems. A sudden, massive drop in population would trigger an immediate housing market collapse, banking failures, and the erasure of trillions of dollars in economic value, throwing the remaining population into a deep, prolonged depression.
• The Cycle of Authoritarianism: Historically, when a society loses a massive faction through violence or sudden political elimination, it does not open up freedom or cultural flourishing. Instead, it almost always creates a severe power vacuum that leads to strict authoritarian rule, paranoia, and continuous internal conflict as the remaining groups struggle for control.🛑
But Mystere thinks I would want all republicans to die... because that's what he wants, but for those who die to be Democrats. He projects his evil desires onto me. But he is too stupid to realize that his dream coming true would have disastrous reverberations. Because, yes... he is evil and very, very stupid.
Clearly the Democrats are too dumb to even know what they just did.
ReplyDeleteGavin Newsome screwed up his own state, forcing his voters to leave, and now they're in other states voting to screw up their new states
I make it a practice not to bother answering douchebags like LES.”Again the word for this Moron is......Assshole”......
ReplyDeleteAnyone notice that this guy never has had a bad word to say about any DEMORATS? Including that Moron Rachel Madcow. or Joe Bydumb!
When an Embassy is attacked by terrorists, AND 4 PEOPLE GET SLAUGHTERED anyone even the morons on the left should know it was “TERRORISM”, and NOT caused because of a Video like Hilary Clinton had said!
The Super Rat NY’s Attorney General Letitia James, who said "GET" Donald Trump at All Costs by Any Means Fair or Not.
Inaccurate. Democrats have had, and do have problems. They simply pale in the face of trumpty dumpty's scam MAGA republicanism.
DeleteThe Stockmarket suffered nightmare day today as the Stock Market was down over 18000 Points.
ReplyDeleteQualcomm falls after missing Q4 chip sales estimates
S&P 500 and Nasdaq see deepest drops since April 2025
So, yesterday it was up.
DeleteRelax. Help is in the way.
The Democratic Celebrated it big win on Tuesday, But the Suffered its Biggest Loss since 2025. IT WAS DOWN Over 18000 points in just one Day.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThe Democratic Celebrated it big win on Tuesday, But then Suffered its Biggest Loss since 2025. IT WAS DOWN Over 18000 points in just one Day.. Today!
MAYBE ONE DAY OUR PRAYERS WILL BE ANSWERED AND WE WILL BE RID OF THAT POS KNOWN AS LES.
ReplyDeleteYou're so invested in the trump lies and MAGA bullshit you've decided truth, which is my messaging, is irrelevant.
DeleteAnd, like senator elect Abdul El Sayed, I have no intention of shutting my mouth.
So, pray on oh Christian Nationalist and know your fake god of greed will not be answering your prayers.
Do Democrat Voters Really Understand What Kind of Loons They Are, and Crazy people that they Have Voted For These are the same Democrats that Called USA ‘A F-xxxng Disgrace,’ And they even Voted for a Women that Wiped Her Dirty Hands on the American Flag. Darializa Avila Chevalier, the Democratic Socialist who stunned New York Democrats by defeating longtime Adriano Espaillat in the 13th Congressional District primary, is Facing a Renewed Outrage over Resurfaced Social Media Posts Including the One in Which She Reportedly Said “She Used an American Flag to Wipe Her Filthy Hands”.
ReplyDeleteSahe said“I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me,” Avila Chevalier reportedly wrote in a now-deleted post. In another post, she reportedly declared, “This country is a fxxxing disgrace.”
These comments set off a Firestorm among Critics who said the posts reflected open contempt for the entire Nation she now wants to Represent in Congress. The backlash intensified after Avila Chevalier, who was backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists of America, that pulled off one of the biggest Political Upsets of the Primary Season, as well as Shocking the entire Nation, and even those others who unabashedly Support the Muslim terrorists.
Another flaming MAGA Islamophobe screaming her ignorance and hate.
DeleteAmerica voted. It rejected your Christian Nationalism and White Supremacy. So, wise up and change. Or, simply shut up with your lies and hate.