Friday, May 22, 2026

Jesse Goes Electric...

...so Who's Masks Have Slipped Again?
History Repeats, First as Tragedy and then Again as Farce.
9/11/01 - The Day the Masks Began to Come Off of Neo-Liberalism, Every Dissent Against the State Became an Act of Terror, and Its' Perpetrator, a Terrorist!
"Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions
- Nietzsche, "Twilight of the Idols"

Main Stream Media (MSM) Theory of Relativity
Terrorism:Media Spectacle::Suicide Bomber:SSBN

...an I.E.D. collapsing the Post WWII Consensus Built Neoliberal International Rules Based Order upon itself.

aka - Blowback!
Trump = Proof the Rules No Longer Function and the Masks Have Now Totally Come Off of Neoliberalism and that the Democrats Can No Longer Put the Political Toothpaste (& Illusion of Order and Control) BACK into the Tube

58 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Do I look like a Democrat?

      from Google AI:

      Historically, the Democratic Party in the South was the party of Jim Crow and segregation. The defining song of this era was "Dixie", which originated in blackface minstrel shows and became the unofficial anthem of the Confederacy and segregationist politicians. I

      Delete
    2. The key word here is "historically". It doesn't say contemporarily. You're a rightturd, which is contemporarily the party of White Supremacy. Democrats progressed. Republicans regressed. But you're very happy about this development. You just don't like the baggage that comes with the White Supremacy brand. Why you try to rebrand it as "race non essentialism".

      FYI, there were zero Democrats in the Confederacy. The Democratic Party was a Union Party. Confederate politicians ceased being Democrats when they seceded.

      Delete
    3. Historically? Nope. Race Essentialism is still the Democratic Party's central tenet, upon which their entire raisson d'etre circulates. Only it's supporting an anti-colonial racial stance now (pro-brown races), instead of its former colonial racial stand (pro-white European races).

      Delete
    4. The party's core - race essentialism - hasn't changed.

      Delete
    5. Race Essentialism is the trump republican party's central tenet, upon which its entire raisson d'etre circulates. White Male Grievance is at the core of the current trump republican party.

      The Democratic Party believes in equality between the races. They are the true party of race non essentialism. They Democrats realize we are a long way off from race non essentialism. Due in LARGE part to the FACT that White Supremacy has come roaring back. Now is definitely not the time to pretend that racism is over.

      Delete
    6. The Democratic Party's anti-white, anti-European race essentialism that discriminates against European ethnicities was amply demonstrated with Joe Biden's judicial nominations from 2021-5. It's Q.E.D. Race essentialism has GOT to go!

      Delete
    7. Joe Biden is neither anti-white nor anti-European and he doesn't believe in race essentialism or discrimination based on race nor does the Democratic Party. These are your White Supremacist delusions. Joe Biden was only making up with the inequality in appointments that preceded him.

      Delete
    8. LOL! Because social justice demanded it! The arc of history needs to be twisted, because it can't bend towards actual justice alone!

      Delete
    9. ...by making appointments on the merits, and not the superficial appearances, of justice.

      Delete
    10. Minus: The arc of history needs to be twisted, because it can't bend towards actual justice alone!

      wtf are you talking about? History is what people do. "History" the concept doesn't make judicial appointments.

      Minus: ...by making appointments on the merits, and not the superficial appearances, of justice.

      The appointments were made on merit. Of all the candidates that are Black, Biden chose the very best. You apparently don't realize that choosing the best candidate is subjective and not 100 percent quantifiable. There is no undisputed and quantifiable "the best" choice in these matters. While you stupidly think there is. And that one of the ways we can tell the best person was chosen would be that they have White skin.

      Delete
    11. ...of all the candidates that were Black, Biden chose the best? Great, the best of the bottom 5% of lawyers. @@

      Delete
    12. from Google:

      Median GPA Distribution: Research indicates that at most U.S. law schools (excluding HBCUs), the median GPA for Black students often falls around the 6.7 to 7.5 percentile of white law students. This means approximately 50% of Black students had a GPA lower than roughly 93% of white students in those studies.

      Performance by Quintile: A significant portion of the disparity is concentrated in the bottom quintile of the overall law school applicant pool.

      Credential Gaps: Studies have shown that the 95th percentile Black student often has credentials equivalent to only the 54th percentile of the white student distribution, contributing to, but not entirely explaining, the performance gap.

      Delete
    13. Minus: ...of all the candidates that were Black, Biden chose the best? Great, the best of the bottom 5% of lawyers. Median GPA Distribution: Research indicates that at most U.S. law schools (excluding HBCUs), the median GPA for Black students often falls around the 6.7 to 7.5 percentile of white law students. This means approximately 50% of Black students had a GPA lower than roughly 93% of white students in those studies.

      Joe Biden elevated ZERO recent law school graduates. He selected individuals with strong backgrounds, lot of experience, and a proven track record of excellence. And your GPA stats aren't even for Black law students and are therefore not germane to the conversation at all. You think your stats show there were zero top tier Black lawyers and Judges for Biden to select from due to being a White Supremacist. There are fewer, but they exist. And Biden chose the best of the best. Not of the "bottom 5 percent" but of all qualified people.

      But I think it is VERY obvious that you care about ONE thing, and that's skin color. If not you'd be criticising donald trump for appointing reality TV and Fox Nooz personalities to important cabinet posts they have zero qualifications for. Being White and famous is what is most important to donald trump. Though he will appoint toadishly loyal minorities (such as Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard). With donald trump it seems being laughably unqualified (but lovers of donald trump, or willing to sell out completely for donald trump) is what he looks for. And you are FINE with it. Why I give ZERO credence to your criticisms of Joe Biden for appointing minority judges. I 100 percent support Joe Biden's commitment to diversity (while he was president). I view it as a positive and not a negative.

      Delete
    14. from Google AI:

      Comprehensive comparative data tracking the exact, isolated percentage of "cum laude" graduates does not exist publicly, as judicial selection tracking usually groups top academic honors together. However, studies assessing the broader academic credentials of federal judges show that Trump nominees graduated with top-tier academic honors at a significantly higher percentage than Biden nominees.

      This variance reflects differing appointment philosophies: the Trump administration prioritized traditional elite legal credentials (clerkships, top percentiles, and prestige law reviews), while the Biden administration prioritized demographic diversity and professional variety (appointing more public defenders, civil rights lawyers, and non-traditional candidates)


      In other words, Biden appointed based on race, and Trump on judicial Merit.

      Delete
    15. Copilot response...

      🤖The blogger’s pattern fits a known rhetorical strategy. He is doing what many ideologues do:

      Present racially charged claims as “just data”.

      Attribute them to an AI to avoid responsibility.

      Draw sweeping conclusions that the data does not support.

      Frame diversity as anti‑merit.

      Frame whiteness as the default for competence.

      You’re not imagining it. You’re recognizing a pattern.🛑

      Your claim that "Biden appointed based on race, and Trump on judicial Merit" is false. trump appointed based on race. And the most important "qualification" for him (and you) is Whiteness.

      🤖Via the google AI...

      ✔ Biden’s nominees:

      Are overwhelmingly highly qualified.

      Include many public defenders, which historically were excluded.

      Include more women and minorities, correcting decades of underrepresentation.

      Have ABA ratings comparable to Trump’s nominees.

      ✔ Trump’s nominees:

      Were selected heavily from elite conservative networks.

      Often had elite credentials, but also included some with low ABA ratings

      Reflected a narrower professional background.

      Neither approach is inherently "more merit‑based". They reflect different definitions of merit.🛑

      Plus you don't even like "liberal elite" colleges and claim they are dominated by Leftist professors. So why are college grades (and not life and on the job experience) the most important factor for you?

      🤖Via Copilot...

      👉Conservative rhetoric about universities:

      “They’re indoctrination centers.”

      “Professors are Marxists.”

      “Degrees don’t mean anything anymore.”

      👉But when discussing judges:

      “Law degrees proves merit.”

      “Top-tier academic honors are the gold standard.”

      “Top 10% of the class matters.”

      ❓Why the switch?

      Because elite academic credentials historically favored white, affluent students. So when those credentials support their preferred candidates, they’re “merit.” When they support someone they dislike — especially a minority — they’re “DEI.” It’s not about consistency. It’s about who benefits.🛑

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. We're ALL "terrorists" now.

      In May of 1979 I learned a very important lesson about the true nature of the US government. That lesson was (and still is) that, "We can do ANYTHING that we want to do to you. The "official rules" are a lie."

      Delete
    2. It was the day that for me, the "masks" came off.

      Delete
    3. I did not receive the "license" that I had earned while attending the USMMA like most of my classmates did on graduation day that June. I had to return to the Administration office a day later and collect it by hand. Such was the action that the Administration thought required to secure an "orderly" graduation ceremony that year... following a round of extra-judicial punishments for insubordination by Midshipman Officers, such as myself. Apparently the Rules were considered "inadequate" to deal with us.

      Delete
    4. The International "Rules-Based Order" was ALWAYS a lie.

      Delete
    5. WTF do you mean? You love that donald trump lies. You praised him for it, remember? He is "The Prince". The Prince keeps his mask in place, he doesn't remove it. This is why I'm a Lefty. We believe in no masks, not wearing them proudly like you and your ilk.

      Delete
    6. LOL! White liberals are Black Panthers in white face. a Minstrel Show with a unique race quota-mandated party-nomination cake walk.

      Delete
    7. "This years SCotUS nominee will be an Indian woman..." the merits of her jurisprudence be damned!

      Delete
    8. Who do you take me for, a white Zip Coon? or a white Jim Crow?

      Delete
    9. What utter stupidity. Your comments are just the racist rants of an angry White man.

      And YOU called donald trump The Prince, and praised him for his lies. That wasn't me. I say it is very obvious that donald trump isn't telling lies for the "greater good", but for his own good. Also for the good of the oligarchs. And that his lies are hurting the rest of us.

      btw, I see not much difference between the brainwashed magaturds who sing their Orange Turd leader's praises, no matter what he does -- and the Turds like you who part ways with him ONLY in regards to him taking direction from Netanyahu to attack Iran. It is far too little and far too late. YOU enabled what is happening in Iran. You're complaining because you got what you vote for. Which is to be lied to. He said "no new foreign wars", but that was a lie from the liar The Prince. YOU GOT WHAT YOU VOTED FOR!!

      Delete
    10. Better Alexander than Caesar. Italian proverb.

      Delete
    11. The "narrative" keeps the kayfabe in play. Especially with all the body slams on trampoline ring floors and fake "sleeper" choke holds demonstrated daily in the political Colliseum by Democrats and Republicans.

      Delete
    12. btw - When do you think Democrats will deliver on their "health care is a human right" rhetoric? Never.

      Delete
    13. I don't know about health care being a human right. People pay taxes for government services. And all US citizens should have access to health care insurance provided by the government. We should also not be turning anyone away in need (or they will die) from the hospital (citizen or not). That's basic human decency, which you've admitted you lack. If calling it a human right is the way to go, then so be it. Bernie Sanders says health care is a human right.

      Delete
    14. The Democratic Party platform asserts that "health care is a right, not a privilege".

      Were you unaware of the platform, or do you not support it?

      Or is it all merely a sign of your basic lack of human decency? LOL!

      Delete
    15. What difference does it make now? The Democrats are obviously not in a position to pass any laws saying healthcare is a human right. If they ever are and such legislation can pass, I'd support it. But I'd be surprised. The ACA was a heavy lift and almost didn't become law. And Turd-2 is currently trying to kill it. Not by repealing it, but by making health care unaffordable they hope to do damage to it. You're the one that suffers from a lack of basic human decency. And are proud you do.

      Delete
    16. They were in 2021 (Supermajorities). Why didn't they pass health care? Biden might outshine Obama? LOL!

      Delete
    17. Minus: They were in 2021 (Supermajorities). Why didn't they pass health care? Biden might outshine Obama? LOL!

      That's an incredibly stupid question and thing to laugh about. The reason is that the Democratic Party isn't a progressive party. There is a progressive caucus, but the party (as a whole) isn't progressive.

      Why doesn't the republican party, which controls the house, senate, and presidency, codify donald trump's tariffs into law? Then there would be no reason to go to the supreme court (and they said the tariffs are unconstitutional and need to be refunded). But the republicans could pass legislation and that would be an easy fix. So why don't they?

      FYI, that's as dumb (at least) a question as the one you asked me. The reason is because the republican party (as a whole) doesn't support donald trump's tariffs. You REALLY don't understand either situation? You are really that stupid? This is a genuine question.

      Delete
  3. DUBYA IS GOING OFF HIS ROCKER EVERY TIME TRUMP MAKE ANOTHER FABULOUS MOMENT! AND AMAZES THE DUMB Democrats
    TRUMPS CONSTANT ABILITY TO LEAD LIKE A REAL LEADER SHOULD, DRIVE THE LEFTIES COOK COO.
    EAT YOUR HEARTS OUT YOU MORONIC SOCIALISTS! THERE’S GONER BE A LOT MORE TO COME

    ReplyDelete
  4. While we Americans go about our lives complaining about things like the price of gas, and the weather, a sinister network of wealthy Marxists tied to the Chinese Communist Party is openly working to shield their brutal dictator masters and undermine our sovereignty. By coming out of the woodwork to create their dirty work and Chaos. This isn’t some conspiracy theory. It’s happening in real time as these Left-wing Radicals rush to defend one of Communism’s most notorious figures after the Justice Department finally held him accountable.

    The Indictment That Exposed The Rot that lies

    The DOJ’s charges against Raúl Castro for his role in the cold-blooded 1996 shootdown of civilian planes—killing four Americans—should have been a unifying moment of justice. Instead, it triggered a coordinated meltdown from far-left groups. These aren’t organic American voices. They’re part of a well-funded machine led by Neville Roy Singham, a Marxist billionaire operating out of China, pumping resources into domestic activists who treat communist regimes like sacred cows.

    These groups immediately parroted Cuban regime talking points, calling the indictment a “pretext for war” and “sham.” They ignore the facts: unarmed humanitarian flights shot out of the sky over international waters, no warnings given, American lives erased. Their defense? Sovereign rights. The same “rights” they deny to anyone who dares challenge their twisted ideology.
    These people aren’t just leftists with misguided idealists. They’re active participants in a foreign-backed campaign to weaken America. They meet with Cuban leaders, coordinate messaging, and mobilize their foot soldiers to pressure U.S. policy all while enjoying the freedoms of the United States of America that they seek to destroy.
    Meet The Singham Network America’s Internal Saboteurs, who work with the Name Calling Progressives that we see in the new every day. The same Name Calling Progressives that are calling our President those Flithy names and accusing him of thigs that he was clearly Cleared of by the courts. But these Deaf, and Dumb Leftist Deadbeats don’t care about that. They have these pebble brains that had all these accusations drummed in to the Pea-Brains that they were sold by the Progressive Democrats with those Anti-Trump Blogs, and even the Leaders of their Disgusting Failed Democratic Party, the same Rotted Party of Hakeem Jeffries, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Ilhan Omar, ,Rashida Tlaib, and even Keith Ellison, and Chuck Schemer. And at the heart of this betrayal sits the Singham Network, funneling money and coordination into outfits like the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), The People’s Forum, Code Pink, and Tricontinental. These aren’t harmless protesters that walk around with signs. . They’re revolutionary gangs of them who traveled to Havana to hug it out with Cuba’s current Dictator, plotting “coordinated actions” against the United States in the ideological, cultural, and media spheres.
    They organize fake “humanitarian” convoys while praising the very regime that keeps its people in poverty and desperation. They claim to love the Cuban people but defend the shoot down order that murdered Americans by the dozens. The hypocrisy stinks to high heaven. One minute, they’re screaming about human rights, the next, they’re justifying murder because it was done by their Socialist, and Communist heroes.The pattern is clear: erode American resolve, manufacture sympathy for these Radical Tyrants, and chip away at our security from inside our borders who are constantly throwing jabs at President Trump.
    It is time to wake up and to prosecute these foreign entities who are creating Havoc, and Mayhem, causing widespread Chaos, Disorder, and Even Destruction in the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dave Dubya, I'm extremely Happy to see that EVERYONE is paying less attention to people like you, AND ESPECIALLY YOU....

    ReplyDelete



  6. Just incase your not aware of it YET, Socialism always fails!
    The concept of Socialism is guilty of a fatal conceit: It believes its system can make better decisions for the people than they can for themselves! Yet,Socialism has failed in every Country in which it has been tried. India, the United Kingdom, and many others had all adopted Socialism at sometime in their past as an economic model following World War II.
    Socialism is guilty of a fatal conceit: It believes its system can make better decisions for the people than they can for themselves.
    Socialists are fond of saying that Socialism has never failed because it has never been tried where they have been say so. . But in truth, Socialism has failed in every country in which it has been tried, from the Soviet Union beginning a century ago to three modern countries that tried but ultimately rejected socialism in India, and the United Kingdom, and yes even in Israel,.
    While there were major political differences between the totalitarian rule of the Soviets and the democratic politics of Israel, India, and the U.K., all three of the latter countries adhered to Socialist principles, nationalizing their major industries and placing economic decision-making in the hands of their governments..
    So why has the American Democrat party embraced Socialism in the states and cities they control? Perhaps it’s because the people are leaving in droves to escape even the thought of their City, State or Nation would be turning to Socialism. .It is very sad, and even pathic that the people here in America are so easily manipulated through propaganda.Don’t belive it? Well then just look at what has happened in New York City! It’s been less than ome year and the people are already sorry that they let themselves vote that way! And already they are thinking of getting rid of Zohran Mamdani, who promised them the world, and has given them Nothing!
    We have so much information available at our fingertips, yet so many people seem to be getting MORE, and MORE IGNORANT! Just look at what has happened tothe Democratic Party in such a short time!.

    How many young people know a THING about history? It seems like they think the world started spinning when they were born

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dave Duyba says;
    “ You can be a racist if you choose. You can be an idiot if you choose also”

    And HE SHOULD KNOW

    ReplyDelete

  8. Why Do Trump Supporters Have Such A Hard Time Admitting He's A Convicted Felon?
    Why? Because this left the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense team and its strategy in the case, including some moves that may undermine appellate issues. However, after the instructions became public, I wrote a column that I thought the case was nearly un-winnable, even for those of us who previously saw a chance for a hung jury. Clarence Darrow would likely have lost with those instructions after the errors in the case by Judge Juan Merchan. At that point, it became a legal canned hunt. So the attention will now shift to the appellate courts. While it may be tough going initially in the New York court system for the former president, this case could well end up in the federal system and the United States Supreme Court. The thrill kill environment of last week may then dissipate as these glaring errors are presented in higher courts.
    The conviction of President Donald Trump in Manhattan of 34 felonies produced citywide celebrations. This thrill-kill environment extended to the media, where former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace that it was “majestic day” and “a day to celebrate.” When I left the courthouse after watching the verdict come in, I was floored by the celebrations outside by both the public and some of the media.
    The leftist celebrants would be wise to think twice before mounting this trophy kill on the political wall. The Trump trial is a target-rich environment for an appeal, with multiple layers of reversible error, in my view.
    I am even less convinced by suggestions that the case could be challenged on the inability of Trump receiving a fair trial in a district that voted roughly 90 percent against him. The problem was not the jury, but the prosecutors and the judge.
    To put it simply Some of the most compelling problems can be divided into four groups.
    The acting Supreme Court justice Juan Merchan was handpicked for this case rather than randomly selected. This is only the latest in a litany of Trump cases where Merchan has meted out tough rulings against Trump and his organization. With any other defendant, there would likely be outrage over his selection. Merchan donated to President Biden. Even though the state bar cleared that violation based on the small size of the contribution, it later stressed that no such contributions were appropriate for a judge. We learned later that Merchan has contributed to a group to stop the GOP and Trump. Merchan’s daughter is also a Democratic organizer who has helped raise millions against Trump and the GOP and for the Democrats.
    To his credit, even CNN legal analyst Elie Honig has previously said that this case was legally dubious, uniquely targeted Trump and could not succeed outside of an anti-Trump district. On the judge, he recently challenged critics on the fairness of assigning a Biden donor who has earmarked donations for “resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.” He asked “Would folks have been just fine with the judge staying on the case if he had donated a couple bucks to “Re-elect Donald Trump, MAGA forever!”? “Absolutely not.”

    ReplyDelete
  9. Continued..
    What is equally disturbing is the failure of Merchan to protect the rights of the defendant and what even critics admit were distinctly pro-prosecution rulings in the trial. It is not just the appearance of a conflict with Judge Merchan but a record of highly biased decisions. In watching Merchan in the courtroom, I was shocked by his rulings as at times incomprehensible and conflicted.
    A leading threshold issue will be the decision to allow Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to effectively try Trump for violations of federal law. The Justice Department declined any criminal charges against Trump under federal election law over the alleged “hush money” payments. The Federal Election Commission likewise found no basis for a civil fine. With no federal prosecution, Bragg decided to use an unprecedented criminal theory not only to zap a dead misdemeanor into life (after the expiration of the statute of limitation) but to allow him to try violations of not only federal election law but also federal taxation violations. In other words, the Justice Department would not prosecute federal violations, so Bragg effectively did it in state court.
    Even when closing arguments were given, analysts on various networks admitted that they were unclear about what Bragg was alleging. The indictment claimed a violation under New York’s election law 17-152 that the falsification of business records were committed to further another crime as an unlawful means to influence the election. However, in a maddeningly circular theory, that other crime could be the falsification of business records. It could also be violations of federal election and taxation laws, which Trump was never charged with, let alone any evidence of what he was convicted of.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Leto face Facts Kamala took a whopping hit in her race against the Greatest Y Prey in the past 3 decades. Let’s face it she was very lousy candidate , she sounded like an idiot when she spoke. And like a Hyena when she laughed. She was just propped up for the gullible like the rest of the democratic Loosers. Trump had a very methodical and intelligent campaign. He Beat Her, ass off on a LANDSLIDE.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Happy Memorial Day weekend and a big Thank you to ALL service to all men and women in the Military

    ReplyDelete
  12. As the time given to Iran grows short, a deal begins to emerge’.
    President Donald Trump announced last noght that a peace deal between the United States, Iran, and other regional partners has been “largely negotiated”, including the opening of the Strait of Hormuz.. After talking to his team, President Trump said that following an Oval Office call on Saturday with leaders from the Middle East and a separate call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a “Memorandum of Understanding” pertaining to peace between Washington and Tehran has been agreed to in principle.
    The potential deal will include Iran’s commitment that it won’t pursue a nuclear weapon, and Tehran agreed to give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, according to two regional officials.
    One official, with direct knowledge of the negotiations, said how Iran will give up its highly enriched uranium is a subject of further negotiations over the course of a 60-day period.

    It’s highly likely that a part of the amount will be diluted, while the rest will be transferred to a third country, potentially Russia, he said.
    Iran has 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium that is enriched up to 60% purity, a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90%, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency.
    The Strait of Hormuz will be gradually open in parallel with the U.S. ending its blockade of Iran’s ports, said the official.

    The Democrats will be devastated, if any kind of a peace is restored and Gas Prices fall. After all, they want the American People to suffer for their own political gain, especially now that we are so close to the elections.. Then the democrats will have to look high and low for another crisis that they won't let go to waste

    ReplyDelete
  13. It certainly seems to me that today's liberal democrats are more prone to mental illness.
    As much as I want to joke about it, I won't. But when I think about ,it certainly seems that way with people like
    Hakeem Jeffrey, and Cory Booker, and AOC, and you can add Chuck Schumer as well.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It certainly seems to me that today's liberal democrats are more prone to mental illness.
    As much as I want to joke about it, I won't. But when I think about ,it certainly seems that way with people like
    Hakeem Jeffrey, and Cory Booker, and AOC, and you can add Chuck Schumer as well.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yesterday when I was about to enter the door it the Four leaf Credit union building I saw s HUGE RAT. I Was about to open the door to leave the credit union when I saw a humongous rat meandering by the door looking for a place out of the rain. He just kept going, not bothered by people or dogs. Finally saw him jump in a street drain .

    Seems to me the amount of garbage kept behind the restaurants needs to be picked up more often in order to help control the problem. Hello city do you hear ma? ? This isn't the first time you're hearing this.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Today, we Commemorate Our Brave Soldiers Who Died or Were Grievously Wounded to Safeguard Our Precious Freedom, and to Protect Us. .
    As we reflect on these sacrifices, let us honor their lives and consider and condemn those who would waste their magnificent contribution to America, either by knowingly collaborating with our enemies or restricting our God-given inalienable rights that are enshrined in our Constitution.

    Those Politicians, Jurists, and others who overtly or covertly undermine or subvert our Constitution are every bit the foe of every American as if they were standing on the battlefield under foreign arms.

    Our Freedom is being squandered by self-serving traitors who are selling out our nation and its citizens in return for temporary political power, or money.
    While our troops fought to protect each other and our nation, today’s political leadership, from the Corrupt, Incompetent, Uncaring Politicians, the bureaucratic cadre of Progressive Communist Democrats, the ungrateful leftist Judges, and Politicians who creates their own law and those big technology multinationals that surreptitiously provide aid and comfort to our enemies, you are all more than the traitors in the battle at home to preserve America and American freedom. But be grateful to our veterans, all of Them, Past, Present, and Future who ensure your safety, and fight for your Constitutional liberties.
    Also while our Brave Troops are fighting thousands of miles from their homes with enemies who have been Murdering our Soliders, and other Americans for over 40 years, Please do not degrade them or call,and INSULT their Commander in Chief those Dirty, Filthy, and UNTRUE names . While you coddle, and protect the Progressive, Socialist, Democratic, Communists, that are Trators to our Great Nation. We are, and susposed to be all Americans, and that is NOT what Americans do to our Fighting Troops.
    Be grateful for your freedom and remember it should never be taken for granted. We have seen, in just a few cycles of progressive communist democrats, our national resolve, our military strength, and our stature within the international community eroded by corrupt, incompetent, and uncaring progressive communist democrats. Our enemy appears to own the Democrat Party, which should rightly brand itself as the U.S. Communist Party.
    Remember who we are and what we stand for, and not those who shout “Kill The Americans”

    ReplyDelete
  17. This is what the Democrats do. They weaponize the US Justice System against Conservatives and try to destroy them PERSONALLY just like they TRIED AND FAILED with citizen Donald Trump.
    And I seriously doubt if any of these greedy evil vultures are in jail, unfortunately.
    And the people of America don't seem to give a damn. All they care about is being able to use their Cell-Phones, and Smole that Crap that America now seems to make legeal after all these years of it being Criminal. They don’t even seem tocare if it causes vehicle collisions and seriously harming others. This is what the Democrats do. They weaponize the US Justice System against Conservatives and try to destroy them PERSONALLY just like they TRIED AND FAILED with citizen Donald Trump.
    America truly is lost.
    In the Biden era, NO ONE was watching this, and the same held true in the case of our Border. It was all come in as much as possible and come in freely. And a record of more than 100 million lethal doses of fentanyl had come into our country with them! .
    The Democrats have tried to Cheat every single day.So when the House flips (if it does) this November, you’re going to know it was because of voter fraud? The Democrat The Steal was Real.

    ReplyDelete
  18. On This Memorial Day , Can we ever say thank You to our Vets enough , I think Not

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure we can. Meden agan! Today is a day of "ritual" honouring. A wreath at the tomb from the high priests of our civic religion.

      Religion - "A unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden- beliefs and practices which unite in one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them."

      -Emile Durkheim

      ...or a single moral community called a "Nation"... or in the case of Democrats, a "Party".

      Delete
    2. ...centered on the artificial class essentialisms of "race", "gender", and "religion" (not "actual" class).

      Delete
    3. It was established originally as the anti-aristocratic (class) party.

      Delete
    4. ...and which morphed into its current artificial class consciousness after its' defeat in the US Civil War.

      Delete
    5. ...so much for the Democratic Party's vision of a viable civic religion. @@

      Delete
    6. Minus: ...so much for the Democratic Party's vision of a viable civic religion.

      They don't have this vision. That's one of your delusions.

      Delete