I think you are far less intelligent than you claim if you also believe donald trump isn't a low IQ moron. But you do have many very crazy ideas about destroying the government we have so it can magically be replaced by something better.
Minus: Keep drinking the kayfabe kool-aid, Derv...
I'd need to start first. btw, it completely and utter absurd to the highest degree that, after YOU were fooled by donald trump's lies (re "no new wars") to say that I'm the one drinking the Kool-aid. How the fVck does YOUR bad judgment reflect badly on ME?
Even though you now realize that donald trump lies and lied to maga, you STILL have raging out-of-control TDS. Because it absolutely is completely deranged to say donald trump is incredibly intelligent.
Eric Weinstein is another hopeless case of TDS. Some people who voted for trump are finally waking up and on their way to recovering. You will never be cured. Your TDS is terminal.
The Debate over Birthright Citizenship has now Reached the Highest Court in the Land. The debate that is now before the Supreme Court Trump v. Barbara, has sparked intense legal and political discussion. Lower courts blocked the order, but the Trump Administration maintains it restores the proper rights, and limits of citizenship. The Executive Order that President Trump’s, signed on January 20, 2025, his first day back in office, seeks to clarify the scope of the 14th Amendment by denying automatic U.S. citizenship to any children born in America and to all temporary visitors such as those engaging in “Birth Tourism”and specially to Illegal Aliens. The order argues that this interpretation aligns with the Constitution’s original meaning rather than the expansive view that has prevailed for many decades. The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” While it wasn’t fully clear which way the high court will go in the landmark case, Republican-appointed justices made clear they were far from a lock for the administration all while President Trump was in the room as the first sitting president in US history to observe oral arguments in person. The Trump administration contends that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” requires more than just the physical location on U.S. soil. It demands Full Legal Allegiance and Complete Political Jurisdiction. Children born to parents who are Temporary Visitors (on visas) or Present Unlawfully Do Not Qualify, as their parents owe primary allegiance elsewhere and lack the permanent ties that establish true jurisdiction.They want to make it clear that birthright citizenship was only intended for American citizens. It was not intended for foreign citizens who illegally entered our country. . The Trump administration contends that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” requires more than just the physical location on U.S. soil. It demands Full Legal Allegiance and Complete Political Jurisdiction. Children born to parents who are Temporary Visitors (on visas) or Present Unlawfully Do Not Qualify, as their parents owe primary allegiance elsewhere and lack the permanent ties that establish true jurisdiction.They want to make it clear that birthright citizenship was only intended for American citizens. border and immigration laws and even create sanctuary cities. With that said, I think it’s an uphill battle for President.Trump. So my fingers are crossed.
The Democratic Critics often label Illegal Aliens as “Undocumented Immigrants,” but the administration and supporters emphasize that Illegal entry or overstaying violates U.S. law, places such individuals outside the full protective and obligatory jurisdiction contemplated by the Amendment’s framers. The order does not rewrite the Constitution; it CLEARLY interprets it faithfully to EXCLUDE “Birth Tourism” and similar practices that treat citizenship as a loophole foe Citizenship. As the Supreme Court weighs the arguments in this high-stakes case—with oral arguments having drawn significant attention and a decision expected by late June or early July 2026the outcome could reshape immigration policy, national identity, and the incentives surrounding legal versus unlawful presence.
This is not about denying humanity or opportunity but about maintaining our national sovereignty, our exceptional American culture, and restoring constitutional fidelity. True reform of immigration must address root causes, but citizenship itself should remain a deliberate covenant, not an automatic byproduct detached from allegiance to America.
Eric Weinstein: Drinking in the full effects of trump kool-aid the man sheeple swoons at the profound gibberish of his guiding darkness, trump.
One malignant narcissist impressing another impressionable mind searching for meaning in the incredible darkness he has surrounded himself in.
When an ignorant self serving narcissist like trump is considered incredibly intelligent then the culture he has infected with his division and hate is speeding to a very unfortunate end.
Eric Weinstein has not supported Donald Trump for president, often describing him as an "existential risk to America and its values". While acknowledging Trump’s shrewdness and criticizing the Democratic party, Weinstein has stated he cannot vote for him, though he sometimes approves of specific deregulatory economic policies.
Existential Risk: Weinstein has frequently criticized Trump, referring to him as an "existential risk to America" and taking issue with his rhetoric on social media, such as praise for extrajudicial actions.
Not a Voter: In 2024, he explicitly stated, "I don't hate Trump... But he doesn't sit well with me either and, like you, I don't think I can vote for him".
Criticism of "MAGA" & Supporters: While sometimes analyzing the appeal of the MAGA movement, he has noted that Trump supporters often live "vicariously" through him, characterizing it as a phenomenon born of frustration, rather than endorsing it.
Political Stance: Weinstein has described himself as holding left-wing views in the past, yet he is highly critical of the current Democratic party, often placing him in a position of criticizing both sides.
Weinstein's position is nuanced—he has complimented specific, quiet deregulation moves—but he has consistently declined to endorse or support Trump's candidacy
Weinstein believes in Democratic Institutions who "gatekeep" the ideas within them. He simply thinks that the Democratic "woke" gatekeepers have gone so far as to prevent "real science" from happening anymore. It's all kayfabe "standard science" (paradigm) now and it's preventing "revolutionary/ extraordinary science" from emerging from it.
Who was president when big pharma was granted immunity? Oh right, it was donald trump. But I don't know that they were wrong. The covid vaccines saved millions of lives. Sounds like a success to me.
Minus: USA - #1 in Covid deaths. That "vaccine" sure was a success!
The people who took it were protected. The people who didn't died (a higher percentage of them). donald trump convinced his magamoron supporters to commit suicide by covid, when he took the vaccine himself.
g00gle "covid vaccines saved lives" and the result says that, with no vaccines, 14 million more people would have died worldwide. But you are absolutely right that the trump administration did a very bad job convincing people to take the vaccine. And, as a result many more people died. A lot of them older trumpers.
They determined the number of lives lost if there had been no vaccines. Based on reported COVID‐19 deaths, vaccinations prevented an estimated 14.4 million deaths...Link
So what? He said that he thinks donald trump is "incredibly intelligent". But donald trump is proveably a moron. Seems to me he is another "intellectually honest" Turd like Jimmy Dore. If he isn't a trump supporter, why is he telling such absurd lies about donald trump's cognitive abilities?
We still have a way to go before Election Day 2028.
It might be a be a good year for the Democrats, or so they think.
Anything can happen between now and Labor Day, so let’s recalibrate then.
But if Democrats fumble the ball here, and it’s possible given their terrible leadership, this moment will be cited as the reason why.
First, CNN polled speech watchers, and Trump’s approval for his agenda grew the more he spoke.
Second, standing with American citizens over illegal aliens shouldn’t be a tough sell.
No Democrat stood up when Trump asked if those who agree that the core function of government is to protect American citizens, not illegals:
The president RIGHTLY called Democrats crazy, adding their agenda is killing the country, but his 2024 win stopped it. Lets face it folks, the Democrats can’t even get behing our Troops in this War with Iran who wants to Protest us from the Iranians who want to Kill us all, because we are Americans! It’s a brutal juxtaposition, one that could be election-killing.
The problem is that it might have happened too early. Again, we’ll see what happens, but last night’s address provided Republicans with a lot of ammunition for campaign ads. Unfortunately, we don't live in a rational world.
Grin and bear it victor. Cause the more American's who wake up to the bulls**t spewed by trump and netanyahu the smaller your growing minority becomes.
No. America simply hasn't signed on to his counter-Mackinder Heartland Theory foreign policy. America has gone from being a world-policing "facilitator" of it, to becoming a "disrupter" of it. And the foreign policy establishment (one of Weinsteins essential democratic institutions) hasn't "bought it" yet. They can't acknowledge the unsustainability of the post WWII neoliberal consensus on the America economy (especially in face of BRICS and the Chines Belt and Road Initiative that revives the old Heartland Strategy (Britain "great Game")
As trump proves a Christian Zionust dictatorship is the very worst choice a people can willingly embrace. Something MAGAts are seemingly more than happy to do.
I'm not arguing your point is invalid Joe, it is a legitimate point for honest discussion. But trump is neither honest nor is to be trusted. Nor is his trumpublican party.
The DC establishment could virtue signal its' "world police" reputation, but can't virtue signal their Iran attacks on BRICS. So who's being dishonest here? Trump says its' for the oil. They say it's about "justice" and liberating the Iranians from theocracy???? How is establishing a Jewish ethnostate a blow against theocracies?
"Genius Move"?? LOL.
ReplyDelete"I think trump is an incredibly intelligent man"... Eric Weinstein.
ReplyDeletedonald trump is a moron who thinks he is smart. I question the intelligence of anyone who can't see this incredibly obvious thing.
^^Drunk on Blue Razzberry Kool-Aid^^
DeleteI think you are far less intelligent than you claim if you also believe donald trump isn't a low IQ moron. But you do have many very crazy ideas about destroying the government we have so it can magically be replaced by something better.
DeleteKeep drinking the kayfabe kool-aid, Derv...
DeleteMinus: Keep drinking the kayfabe kool-aid, Derv...
DeleteI'd need to start first. btw, it completely and utter absurd to the highest degree that, after YOU were fooled by donald trump's lies (re "no new wars") to say that I'm the one drinking the Kool-aid. How the fVck does YOUR bad judgment reflect badly on ME?
Even though you now realize that donald trump lies and lied to maga, you STILL have raging out-of-control TDS. Because it absolutely is completely deranged to say donald trump is incredibly intelligent.
Eric Weinstein is another hopeless case of TDS. Some people who voted for trump are finally waking up and on their way to recovering. You will never be cured. Your TDS is terminal.
^^You must be having a Kool-Aid blackout, Derv.^^
DeleteNope. I never drank the maga kool aide.
DeleteThe Debate over Birthright Citizenship has now Reached the Highest Court in the Land.
ReplyDeleteThe debate that is now before the Supreme Court Trump v. Barbara, has sparked intense legal and political discussion. Lower courts blocked the order, but the Trump Administration maintains it restores the proper rights, and limits of citizenship.
The Executive Order that President Trump’s, signed on January 20, 2025, his first day back in office, seeks to clarify the scope of the 14th Amendment by denying automatic U.S. citizenship to any children born in America and to all temporary visitors such as those engaging in “Birth Tourism”and specially to Illegal Aliens. The order argues that this interpretation aligns with the Constitution’s original meaning rather than the expansive view that has prevailed for many decades.
The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
While it wasn’t fully clear which way the high court will go in the landmark case, Republican-appointed justices made clear they were far from a lock for the administration all while President Trump was in the room as the first sitting president in US history to observe oral arguments in person.
The Trump administration contends that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” requires more than just the physical location on U.S. soil. It demands Full Legal Allegiance and Complete Political Jurisdiction. Children born to parents who are Temporary Visitors (on visas) or Present Unlawfully Do Not Qualify, as their parents owe primary allegiance elsewhere and lack the permanent ties that establish true jurisdiction.They want to make it clear that birthright citizenship was only intended for American citizens.
It was not intended for foreign citizens who illegally entered our country.
.
The Trump administration contends that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” requires more than just the physical location on U.S. soil. It demands Full Legal Allegiance and Complete Political Jurisdiction. Children born to parents who are Temporary Visitors (on visas) or Present Unlawfully Do Not Qualify, as their parents owe primary allegiance elsewhere and lack the permanent ties that establish true jurisdiction.They want to make it clear that birthright citizenship was only intended for American citizens.
border and immigration laws and even create sanctuary cities. With that said, I think it’s an uphill battle for President.Trump. So my fingers are crossed.
The Democratic Critics often label Illegal Aliens as “Undocumented Immigrants,” but the administration and supporters emphasize that Illegal entry or overstaying violates U.S. law, places such individuals outside the full protective and obligatory jurisdiction contemplated by the Amendment’s framers. The order does not rewrite the Constitution; it CLEARLY interprets it faithfully to EXCLUDE “Birth Tourism” and similar practices that treat citizenship as a loophole foe Citizenship.
As the Supreme Court weighs the arguments in this high-stakes case—with oral arguments having drawn significant attention and a decision expected by late June or early July 2026the outcome could reshape immigration policy, national identity, and the incentives surrounding legal versus unlawful presence.
This is not about denying humanity or opportunity but about maintaining our national sovereignty, our exceptional American culture, and restoring constitutional fidelity. True reform of immigration must address root causes, but citizenship itself should remain a deliberate covenant, not an automatic byproduct detached from allegiance to America.
Eric Weinstein: Drinking in the full effects of trump kool-aid the man sheeple swoons at the profound gibberish of his guiding darkness, trump.
ReplyDeleteOne malignant narcissist impressing another impressionable mind searching for meaning in the incredible darkness he has surrounded himself in.
When an ignorant self serving narcissist like trump is considered incredibly intelligent then the culture he has infected with his division and hate is speeding to a very unfortunate end.
^^Wearing his TDS Goggles^^
DeleteEric Weinstein isn't a Trump "supporter":
Deletefrom Google AI:
Eric Weinstein has not supported Donald Trump for president, often describing him as an "existential risk to America and its values". While acknowledging Trump’s shrewdness and criticizing the Democratic party, Weinstein has stated he cannot vote for him, though he sometimes approves of specific deregulatory economic policies.
Existential Risk: Weinstein has frequently criticized Trump, referring to him as an "existential risk to America" and taking issue with his rhetoric on social media, such as praise for extrajudicial actions.
Not a Voter: In 2024, he explicitly stated, "I don't hate Trump... But he doesn't sit well with me either and, like you, I don't think I can vote for him".
Criticism of "MAGA" & Supporters: While sometimes analyzing the appeal of the MAGA movement, he has noted that Trump supporters often live "vicariously" through him, characterizing it as a phenomenon born of frustration, rather than endorsing it.
Political Stance: Weinstein has described himself as holding left-wing views in the past, yet he is highly critical of the current Democratic party, often placing him in a position of criticizing both sides.
Weinstein's position is nuanced—he has complimented specific, quiet deregulation moves—but he has consistently declined to endorse or support Trump's candidacy
Weinstein believes in Democratic Institutions who "gatekeep" the ideas within them. He simply thinks that the Democratic "woke" gatekeepers have gone so far as to prevent "real science" from happening anymore. It's all kayfabe "standard science" (paradigm) now and it's preventing "revolutionary/ extraordinary science" from emerging from it.
DeleteMinus: It's all kayfabe "standard science" (paradigm) now and it's preventing "revolutionary/ extraordinary science" from emerging from it.
DeleteNo. And you don't want that. When a revolutionary new way to combat viruses was introduced to the public you fear mongered the science.
...with 100% liability protection? You're damn sure being skeptical was the prudent position.
DeleteIf you want to revolutionize science you'd better damn well willing to pay the consequences for being wrong. Pfizer, et al, were NOT.
Ich kann einen großen Pilz in 1 Sekunde schlucken. LOL! LOL! LOL! Whoo hoo!
DeleteWho was president when big pharma was granted immunity? Oh right, it was donald trump. But I don't know that they were wrong. The covid vaccines saved millions of lives. Sounds like a success to me.
DeleteIt did? Amazing!
DeleteIt is pretty amazing.
DeleteUSA - #1 in Covid deaths. That "vaccine" sure was a success!
DeleteMinus: USA - #1 in Covid deaths. That "vaccine" sure was a success!
DeleteThe people who took it were protected. The people who didn't died (a higher percentage of them). donald trump convinced his magamoron supporters to commit suicide by covid, when he took the vaccine himself.
g00gle "covid vaccines saved lives" and the result says that, with no vaccines, 14 million more people would have died worldwide. But you are absolutely right that the trump administration did a very bad job convincing people to take the vaccine. And, as a result many more people died. A lot of them older trumpers.
They determined the number of lives lost if there had been no vaccines. Based on reported COVID‐19 deaths, vaccinations prevented an estimated 14.4 million deaths...Link
Minus: Eric Weinstein isn't a Trump "supporter".
DeleteSo what? He said that he thinks donald trump is "incredibly intelligent". But donald trump is proveably a moron. Seems to me he is another "intellectually honest" Turd like Jimmy Dore. If he isn't a trump supporter, why is he telling such absurd lies about donald trump's cognitive abilities?
We still have a way to go before Election Day 2028.
ReplyDeleteIt might be a be a good year for the Democrats, or so they think.
Anything can happen between now and Labor Day, so let’s recalibrate then.
But if Democrats fumble the ball here, and it’s possible given their terrible leadership, this moment will be cited as the reason why.
First, CNN polled speech watchers, and Trump’s approval for his agenda grew the more he spoke.
Second, standing with American citizens over illegal aliens shouldn’t be a tough sell.
No Democrat stood up when Trump asked if those who agree that the core function of government is to protect American citizens, not illegals:
The president RIGHTLY called Democrats crazy, adding their agenda is killing the country, but his 2024 win stopped it.
Lets face it folks, the Democrats can’t even get behing our Troops in this War with Iran who wants to Protest us from the Iranians who want to Kill us all, because we are Americans!
It’s a brutal juxtaposition, one that could be election-killing.
The problem is that it might have happened too early. Again, we’ll see what happens, but last night’s address provided Republicans with a lot of ammunition for campaign ads. Unfortunately, we don't live in a rational world.
Unfortunately, we don't live in a rational world.
DeleteSo true. For if we did neither trump or netanyahu would be in any position near power or influence.
Quantum Physics is rational?
Delete...or comprehnsible?
DeleteHow about a global strategy the optimizes Mahan (Seapower) and Minimizes the advantages of the Mackinder Heartland Strategy (Asian land power).
DeleteObama's "Pivot to Asia" would have lead to a direct US confrontation with China.
The Democratic foreign policy establishment (Brookings Institute) is stuck in post-WWII consensus Neoliberalism. It's unsustainable.
DeleteI see that Les Carpenter is here again spreading his usual disgusting Venom once again .
ReplyDeleteGrin and bear it victor. Cause the more American's who wake up to the bulls**t spewed by trump and netanyahu the smaller your growing minority becomes.
DeleteEven MTG gas woke up to the malignant narcissist's bulls**t.
DeleteAs well as Meagan Kelly has.
DeleteEven Tucker Carlson.
DeleteNo. America simply hasn't signed on to his counter-Mackinder Heartland Theory foreign policy. America has gone from being a world-policing "facilitator" of it, to becoming a "disrupter" of it. And the foreign policy establishment (one of Weinsteins essential democratic institutions) hasn't "bought it" yet. They can't acknowledge the unsustainability of the post WWII neoliberal consensus on the America economy (especially in face of BRICS and the Chines Belt and Road Initiative that revives the old Heartland Strategy (Britain "great Game")
DeleteAs trump proves a Christian Zionust dictatorship is the very worst choice a people can willingly embrace. Something MAGAts are seemingly more than happy to do.
DeleteI'm not arguing your point is invalid Joe, it is a legitimate point for honest discussion. But trump is neither honest nor is to be trusted. Nor is his trumpublican party.
The DC establishment could virtue signal its' "world police" reputation, but can't virtue signal their Iran attacks on BRICS. So who's being dishonest here? Trump says its' for the oil. They say it's about "justice" and liberating the Iranians from theocracy???? How is establishing a Jewish ethnostate a blow against theocracies?
DeleteThere is NO doubt in my mind that today’s Democrat’s are all sociopaths. PERIOD!
ReplyDeleteAs there is ABSOLUTELY zero doubt but what trumpublicans are all fascists and deluded Chritian Zionists with psychopathic tendencies.
DeleteWOW WHAT originality
Delete