Friday, February 20, 2026

On Guilt-Pride and Post-Colonialist Identity Performance Art

"Those MAGA People Need Shaming for Their Culpability for  White History.  I'm Against White Colonialist History (Except for New Colour Revolutions in Places like 2014 Ukraine or 2011 Tahrir Square).  The Guilt of Colonization and Slavery is Theirs, Not Mine!  I'm Proud to Discriminate Against Them in Favour of You Brown People!  Trust Me, I'll NEVER Criticize Brown People (Unless They Support the White Colonizers) and I'll NEVER Criticize Your Culture, ONLY My Own!  I am AUTHENTICALLY SINCERE (aka - Genuinely Pretending)!  MUH!  Democracy!  I AM YOUR WHITE SAVIOUR and YOU are MY MAGICAL NEGROES!"

"Woke Guilt-Pride.  Take a Stand FOR Anti-White Racial Discrimination Against the Evil Colonizers!  Maintaining Your Brown Races Is Essential and Therefore Your Culture(s) Must be Restored and Maintained!  White Colonialist Culture(s) OUT!  Decolonize Education!  Decolonize Gaza!  Decolonize ALL White and Brown Minds!"

“Postcolonialism is the invention of rich Indian guys who wanted to make a good career in the west by playing on the guilt of white liberals”

― Slavoj Žižek

“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”
–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"

31 comments:

  1. The MORON leftist Hate the President so much that they pray for everything that he does to fail, even if it means HURTING OUR COUNTRY.
    For example, President Trump has not even in Office for 30 days and already the Deaf and Dumb Democratic Progressives were right there BLAMING HIM FOR ALL THE CRAZIEST CRAP THAT THE DELUSIONAL JOE BIDEN WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR.

    Reply

    ReplyDelete

  2. The Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs in major setback for president.
    This will only Hurt our Country, and I guess that’s exactly what the Democrats want, so that it will help them in the Midterm Elections.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your "quote" is 100 fake. It's much easier to refute a straw man, which your fake quote is.

    "Those People Need Shaming for White History. I'm Against White History".

    What would be the point of shaming anyone for "White history", when the history was made by people who are all dead? I'm not against any history. It happened. Being "against" it won't mean it didn't happen. I think we should learn from history and not repeat past mistakes.

    What "white history" do you support? You think slavery and discrimination were good ideas and you're happy they occurred?

    "The Guilt of Colonization and Slavery is Theirs, Not Mine!"

    No. Why would that be the case? Unless you're claiming this history by saying colonization and slavery was a good idea, as it seems you are.

    "I'm Proud to Discriminate Against Them in Favour of You Brown People!"

    Discrimination against anyone due to their race is wrong. I'd never be proud of discriminating against someone for having the same skin color as dead White Supremacists. Unless they are proud White Supremacists and say slavery and discrimination were all good ideas that need to be continued (the discrimination part). As you obviously do.

    "Trust Me, I'll NEVER Criticize Brown People (Unless They Support the White Colonizers) and I'll NEVER Criticize Your Culture, ONLY My Own!"

    Sure, I'd criticize a Black person that said they were happy there was slavery in the past. Or at least think this was a strange view to have. It's something that happened (in any case) and nothing can be done to change the past.

    btw, White supremacy isn't my culture. When I criticize it, I'm not criticizing "my own" culture. You consider White Supremacy to be your "culture"?

    "I am AUTHENTICALLY SINCERE (aka - Genuinely Pretending)!"

    "Genuinely pretending" is an oxymoron. A person is genuine -- or pretending. There is no "genuinely pretending".

    "Woke Guilt-Pride. Take a Stand FOR Anti-White Racial Discrimination Against the Evil Colonizers! Maintaining Your Brown Races Is Essential..."

    I'm strongly opposed to both "Woke Guilt-Pride" and "Anti-White Racial Discrimination". The historical colonizers are all dead. Unless you mean people who support modern day colonization, like donald trump... who thinks Venezuela "stole" from American oil companies by kicking them out of THEIR country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Your Culture(s) Must be Restored and Maintained! White Culture(s) OUT!"

      I support people honoring and maintaining their own cultures... if that's what they want to do. You're for forcing people to abandon their cultures? I thought conservatives were all about freedom. I guess that is freedom for Whites only. And "freedom" for non-whites to adopt White culture (or be forced to adopt it).

      Also, White Culture "out" from where? The United States? That's not going to happen due to being impossible. And what "white culture" are you referring to? There are many "white" cultures. Do you mean White American culture? You want to forbid White people from practicing their individual White cultures? You really are a hardcore fascist who is completely opposed to individual freedoms, aren't you? FYI, you're a very, very small demographic. Why you aren't going to get your way.

      But you might mean that White Supremacy is "White Culture"? In which case, I very much *do* want it reduced. We could start by getting White Supremacy out of the White House. As for getting White Supremacists out of the United States (people like you), that's impossible. Due to you being an American citizen and having constitutional rights. I know constitutional rights are meaningless to you, but I believe in them.

      Salvatore: The MORON leftist Hate the President so much that they pray for everything that he does to fail, even if it means HURTING OUR COUNTRY.

      Not at all. I want everything donald trump does to hurt the country to fail. If he was to do something to help the country, I'd want it to be successful, of course.

      FYI, the supreme court has ruled that donald trump's illegal tariffs must be rolled back. These tariffs were bad for the country, so them being deemed illegal by the scotus is an example of something donald trump did to try to harm our country failing... which, YES, I support. I'm glad he failed on this front.

      Delete
    2. ^^Not a reply to, or refutation of ANYTHING I wrote^^

      A blog comment is made up of words? Who knew?

      Your original post is also comprised of words. What a pointless/meaningless reply.

      Delete
    3. As a race essentialist, what did you think of Joe Biden's requirements for SCotUS Assoc. Justice? Did you find them reasonable? Black Female. If DJT listed his next SCotUS pick as having to be White and Male, would you praise or condemn it? Do you think Race and Sex are appropriate requirements for Public Service positions?

      Delete
    4. Would you find it discriminatory if 78% of Trumps judicial appointments over the next 4 years were white males (as 62% of Biden's were POC and 60% were women and only 15% were white men)

      78% of all 1.3 million US lawyers are white and 58% are male.

      Delete
    5. Do you believe that Joe Biden is a race essentialist or not?

      Delete
    6. Minus: Do you believe that Joe Biden is a race essentialist or not?

      Joe Biden believed representation was important re his appointments. He also appointed White people. He was not a "race essentialist".

      As per g00gle, "As of late 2024, approximately 74% to 76% of all sitting Article III federal judges in the United States are White, and roughly 67-68% are men".

      Joe Biden did NOT increase the percentage of Judges who are Black to 62 percent. Joe Biden did NOT increase the percentage of Judges who are women to 60 percent. That Joe Biden appointed more Black judges and more women judges when fewer were appointed in the past (to increase representation) was a good thing and not indicative of "race essentialism" in the least.

      I don't give a poop that you feel threatened (as a White Supremacist) that Joe Biden appointed qualified minorities in order to increase representation.

      donald trump doesn't need to announce he will appoint a White person. I expect he will, given that is what he has done (mostly).

      Delete
    7. It sure seemed to be essential to Biden that the SCotUS assoc. Justice be a black female. And since she had no competition, there's no way she was the most qualified candidate. Many are now questioning if she were even minimally qualified... we certainly didn't get the best legal candidate.

      Delete
    8. ...but then again, when race is the "essential" criteria as it was in this case, you get what you get. A third tier associate justice.

      Delete
    9. Minus: ...there's no way she was the most qualified candidate.

      g00gle AI: Ketanji Brown Jackson was widely considered exceptionally qualified for the Supreme Court, receiving a unanimous "Well Qualified" rating from the American Bar Association. Her extensive, diverse experience—including federal trial/appellate judge, public defender, and Sentencing Commission vice chair—led many legal experts to affirm her credentials.

      But, to you, she lacks the most important qualification... Being a White and/or male person.

      Delete
    10. Minus: but then again, when race is the "essential" criteria as it was in this case, you get what you get. A third tier associate justice.

      Because, for a White Supremacist like you, there can be no first tier choice that is also a Black female. In your racist, misogynist mind the two are incompatible. In your White Supremacist opinion, such a person simply can't exist.

      Delete
    11. She lacks the most "essential" qualification. Being the BEST qualified legal practitioner. Because America deserves only the BEST.

      Delete
    12. ...her race/ sex being Biden's "essential" qualification was entirely NON-ESSENTIAL. And you agree with Biden. *tsk-tsk*

      Delete
    13. Minus: She lacks the most "essential" qualification. Being the BEST qualified legal practitioner.

      Except that she is. Obviously, to you, "BEST" means "White".

      Delete
    14. lol! Yes, both she and Barrack Obama are veritable Constitutional Law scholars... @@

      Following judicial precedents isn't quite the same thing as setting them.

      Delete
  4. As for the video, what is claimed is ridiculous moronity. This video shows two liars talking about their delusions. What incredibly offensive bullplop. What they are talking about has nothing to do with the Left. It is a twisted misrepresentation. I'm thinking deliberate. Though the reason for the incredible distortions they're spinning could be due to their horrible Turd mindsets. Everything said in the video is almost 100 percent completely false. This lady had no idea what the fVck she's talking about. Or she's lying. How should I know what goes through the twisted minds of hate-filled Turds?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In other words, all true. Thanks fr playing.

      Delete
    2. I said everything said was a lie and you conclude I affirmed everything said was true? I guess. To someone (like you) who thinks lies are the truth that would probably be the case.

      I gave you my motivations with my first comment. I suspect many if not most Democrats would (at least) broadly agree. Yet the video claims the Left's motivations are otherwise. Those were the lies.

      Meaning... I already told you what the lie are and what the truth is.

      Delete
    3. You can't and won't substantiate a single lie the woman made. You're "motive" is to pretend that you're not the liar.

      Delete
    4. Lionel Shriver didn't substantiate her claims. She said, "this is what motivates the Left", then gave her incorrect opinions on what the motivations are. Opinions aren't substantiation. You obviously don't know what "substantiate" means.

      I previously directed you back to my first comment. I gave the real motivations in this comment. Mine, at least. And I think most Leftists would agree.

      But I'll give you some examples. You said wouldn't. But you probably won't consider my debunkings "substantiated"... due to the fact that you obviously don't know what the word means.

      1. I think they reject the entire notion of a nation state.

      FALSE.

      The Left does not reject the idea of nations and borders. This is a completely absurd claim. This is obviously a lie. I know I don't believe this AT ALL. I strongly believe in borders and immigration. Barack Obama and Joe Biden deported more illegal immigrants then donald trump. More proof this is a false claim.

      2. They don't come out and say "we don't want to have countries" [but that's what they want].

      FALSE.

      Substantiation? None. This is an extremely fringe idea. 99 percent (at least) of the Left would disagree with this. I know I did.

      She makes these two completely absurd claims in just the first 18 seconds of the video with zero substantiation. Yet (according to you) I should be offering substantiation that her absurd claims are false? How about you present the evidence that they're true? You won't because you can't. Aside from her moronic opinion, you won't be able to cite any official statements/policies/platforms that affirm any of this bullplop represents actual positions held by the Left.

      Delete
    5. The Left does not reject the idea of nations and borders.

      So what was Renee Good protesting? What is Tim Walz upset about? Why are there "sanctuary cities"?

      Delete
    6. Minus: So what was Renee Good protesting? What is Tim Walz upset about?

      ICE terrorism. donald trump's lies about going after "the worst of the worst". The fact that Obama and Biden both deported illegal aliens WITHOUT resorting to violating the Constitution and unnecessary brutality.

      Minus: Why are there "sanctuary cities"?

      Because immigration enforcement is the preview of the federal government. Nothing stopped ICE from enforcing immigration laws in so-called "sanctuary cities" while Obama or Biden were president. These cities only said, "we will use our resources to do our job and the federal government can use its resources to do its job". And they do cooperate with ICE. They only decline to do ICE's job.

      FYI, as a Leftist I strongly support the idea of nations and borders. That there could even be a world without nations or borders is Libertarian moronity. republican donors support bringing in cheap labor to force down wages, not Democrats.

      Delete
    7. 🤖g00gle AI: Based on available records and fact-checking, the Obama administration did use chain-link enclosures, often described as "cages," to detain unaccompanied migrant children in 2014, but these were largely used to manage a surge of minors, not as part of a systematic policy to separate children from their parents.🛑

      Turd-1 kidnapped migrant kids. Putin kidnapped Ukraine kids. Because they are both evil Turds who live inflicting misery on innocents.

      Barack Obama didn't kidnap children.

      Delete