What’s happening right now is that Democrats, who have been literally thrown out of power by the American voters in a landslide victory for Donald Trump, have decided they’re going to deploy a widely-used tactic from Trump’s first term to thwart the president’s agenda: use the federal judiciary. Under the FALSE PRETEXT that the lower federal courts are part of a “coequal branch of government” with the executive, they’re aiming to shut down Trump’s reform efforts with a fusillade of preliminary injunctions.And if they can’t succeed in that then just make him look bad as they did in his first term. In recent months or years dozens of lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration by Democrat attorneys general and various left-wing groups. In hope to neve have him be elected again, but since that didn’t work, they are trying their best to make him fail this time around, and do so before the end of his term keeping JDVance from being elected when Trump’s term expires. These groups have carefully selected their venues, ensuring the lawsuits come before rabidly anti-Trump activist judges. So far, the tactic seems to be working. As of this past weekend, eight different rulings from the federal bench have temporarily halted the president’s executive orders. Federal judges in Democrat-majority districts have issued preliminary injunctions blocking Trump’s executive actions to end birthright citizenship, reform and downsize the United States Agency for International Development, and offer buyouts to federal bureaucrats. A federal judge this past weekend blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency and all other political appointees in the Trump administration — including the Treasury secretary and his deputies ,And it matters not if Elon Musk Successfully Succeeded or not. As long as he seems that he didn’t. Now, Did the Democrats nudge Ukraine's Zelensky to reject mineral deal with Trump? Everything certainty points in that direction! \ The fallout from the tense Oval Office meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky just took another twist. A report by New York Post suggests that Democratic lawmakers may have played a role in Zelensky’s decision to reject a crucial mineral deal with the US and the outcome might not be what Ukraine needs right now. According to the New York Post. Sen. Chris Murphy, Zelensky’s meeting earlier Saturday with Democrats had a significant impact on his approach when he finally sat down with Trump at the White House, as per the records show. Murphy shared on social media that during their discussion, Zelensky confirmed that Ukraine would not support a peace agreement with Russia if it didn’t include Real Security Arrangements for Ukraine, reported New York Post. President Zelensky confirmed that the Ukrainian people will not support a “fake” peace agreement where Putin gets everything he wants and there are no Security Arrangements for Ukraine,” quoted New York Post. This meeting took place just a few hours before Zelensky was due to meet with Trump, and it seems that Democratic leaders in Washington were advising Zelensky to reject Trump’s proposed deal, according to New York Post's op-ed. The deal would have seen Ukraine and the US partner to mine Ukraine’s rich rare-earth mineral deposits, with the proceeds being used to help rebuild Ukraine, as per the report. The outcome of the meeting with Trump was a disaster for Ukraine and a gift to Russian president Vladimir Putin, reported New York Post. How these clowns think their dirty activism will hold up remains to be seen. Anyway this is Starting To Unravel.
"Good times" for you is bad times for people you hate. "People you hate" includes people that voted for d0n0ld. d0n0ld hates everyone except the very wealthy. Social Security benefits of republican-voting seniors is being targeted. republicans that voted for the Orange Turd are being fired from their government jobs. Everyone* will be harmed when the tRump depression hits. We are now in the FAAFO phase with "bad times" TIMES 100 on the horizon.
*Not the uber wealthy. Depressions are a buying opportunity for them.
In your telling of it, you leave out too much and too many "facts that don't fit the narrative" for verisimilitude. In other words, you empahsize "partial truths"... partial to yourself and your political group... aka producing gaslight.
You're talking about me or yourself? Or you think you give ALL the facts? As opposed to spun facts and lies... hence the gaslight... emanating from YOU. It's overwhelming in your digital presence.
...I then refute your ridiculous paranoaic-critical explanation for the "facts" in your select assemblage. (aka - "Putin as Hitler" instead of "the people as the source of the problem") Scapegoating is fine provided you're skewering the right goat.
Copilot: ...people naturally select facts that support their own perspective, intentionally or unintentionally. Crafting an argument isn’t about presenting every fact; it's about presenting the ones that build your case. Expecting someone to argue against themselves by presenting contradictory facts is unreasonable -- after all, that’s where constructive debate comes in.
It sounds like the other commenter is leaning toward a combative approach rather than engaging in a balanced discussion. If they have other facts, it’s on them to present and back them up. You’re not obligated to do their legwork for them. [end]
Your "facts" are frequently BS and/or rightwing spin. I don't consume nearly as much rightturd media as you. So, it's not that I "forgot" your "facts", it's that I haven't heard them. Or heard them and realized they aren't facts at all.
What’s happening right now is that Democrats, who have been literally thrown out of power by the American voters in a landslide victory for Donald Trump, have decided they’re going to deploy a widely-used tactic from Trump’s first term to thwart the president’s agenda: use the federal judiciary. Under the FALSE PRETEXT that the lower federal courts are part of a “coequal branch of government” with the executive, they’re aiming to shut down Trump’s reform efforts with a fusillade of preliminary injunctions.And if they can’t succeed in that then just make him look bad as they did in his first term.
ReplyDeleteIn recent months or years dozens of lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration by Democrat attorneys general and various left-wing groups. In hope to neve have him be elected again, but since that didn’t work, they are trying their best to make him fail this time around, and do so before the end of his term keeping JDVance from being elected when Trump’s term expires. These groups have carefully selected their venues, ensuring the lawsuits come before rabidly anti-Trump activist judges. So far, the tactic seems to be working. As of this past weekend, eight different rulings from the federal bench have temporarily halted the president’s executive orders.
Federal judges in Democrat-majority districts have issued preliminary injunctions blocking Trump’s executive actions to end birthright citizenship, reform and downsize the United States Agency for International Development, and offer buyouts to federal bureaucrats. A federal judge this past weekend blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency and all other political appointees in the Trump administration — including the Treasury secretary and his deputies ,And it matters not if Elon Musk Successfully Succeeded or not. As long as he seems that he didn’t.
Now, Did the Democrats nudge Ukraine's Zelensky to reject mineral deal with Trump? Everything certainty points in that direction! \
The fallout from the tense Oval Office meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky just took another twist. A report by New York Post suggests that Democratic lawmakers may have played a role in Zelensky’s decision to reject a crucial mineral deal with the US and the outcome might not be what Ukraine needs right now.
According to the New York Post. Sen. Chris Murphy, Zelensky’s meeting earlier Saturday with Democrats had a significant impact on his approach when he finally sat down with Trump at the White House, as per the records show. Murphy shared on social media that during their discussion, Zelensky confirmed that Ukraine would not support a peace agreement with Russia if it didn’t include Real Security Arrangements for Ukraine, reported New York Post. President Zelensky confirmed that the Ukrainian people will not support a “fake” peace agreement where Putin gets everything he wants and there are no Security Arrangements for Ukraine,” quoted New York Post.
This meeting took place just a few hours before Zelensky was due to meet with Trump, and it seems that Democratic leaders in Washington were advising Zelensky to reject Trump’s proposed deal, according to New York Post's op-ed. The deal would have seen Ukraine and the US partner to mine Ukraine’s rich rare-earth mineral deposits, with the proceeds being used to help rebuild Ukraine, as per the report. The outcome of the meeting with Trump was a disaster for Ukraine and a gift to Russian president Vladimir Putin, reported New York Post.
How these clowns think their dirty activism will hold up remains to be seen. Anyway this is Starting To Unravel.
"Good times" for you is bad times for people you hate. "People you hate" includes people that voted for d0n0ld. d0n0ld hates everyone except the very wealthy. Social Security benefits of republican-voting seniors is being targeted. republicans that voted for the Orange Turd are being fired from their government jobs. Everyone* will be harmed when the tRump depression hits. We are now in the FAAFO phase with "bad times" TIMES 100 on the horizon.
ReplyDelete*Not the uber wealthy. Depressions are a buying opportunity for them.
Ride the Tiger, baby!
DeleteYou are definitely committed to riding the maga tiger.
ReplyDelete...and you to gaslighting + white guilt-pride.
DeleteNo.
DeleteJust caught a whiff of it, again! Gaslight.
DeleteF
DeleteMinus: Just caught a whiff of it, again! Gaslight.
DeleteOf course. You're located at a bigly source of the gas. Yourself.
If that were true, it wouldn't just be an occassional "whiff" that is "caught" only exists in your digital presence.
DeleteI write the truth as I see it. I don't try to gaslight anyone.
ReplyDeleteIn your telling of it, you leave out too much and too many "facts that don't fit the narrative" for verisimilitude. In other words, you empahsize "partial truths"... partial to yourself and your political group... aka producing gaslight.
DeleteYou're talking about me or yourself? Or you think you give ALL the facts? As opposed to spun facts and lies... hence the gaslight... emanating from YOU. It's overwhelming in your digital presence.
DeleteI merely incorporate all the pertinent facts that you conveniently leave out.
Delete...I then refute your ridiculous paranoaic-critical explanation for the "facts" in your select assemblage. (aka - "Putin as Hitler" instead of "the people as the source of the problem") Scapegoating is fine provided you're skewering the right goat.
Delete...and not just a random shape-goat.
DeleteMinus: I merely incorporate all the pertinent facts that you conveniently leave out.
ReplyDeleteNo.
...you're doing it again. Forgetting facts!
DeleteCopilot: ...people naturally select facts that support their own perspective, intentionally or unintentionally. Crafting an argument isn’t about presenting every fact; it's about presenting the ones that build your case. Expecting someone to argue against themselves by presenting contradictory facts is unreasonable -- after all, that’s where constructive debate comes in.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like the other commenter is leaning toward a combative approach rather than engaging in a balanced discussion. If they have other facts, it’s on them to present and back them up. You’re not obligated to do their legwork for them. [end]
Your "facts" are frequently BS and/or rightwing spin. I don't consume nearly as much rightturd media as you. So, it's not that I "forgot" your "facts", it's that I haven't heard them. Or heard them and realized they aren't facts at all.