They tried to steal it. They failed. It was a weird dynamic where this event in Pennsylvania’s Senate race was shocking but also not too surprising given liberal America’s penchant for engaging in election shenanigans when results don’t go their way. Republican Dave McCormick defeated incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), but he refused to concede. Even with no path given how much vote is left and how provisional ballots land, with most being rejected due to not meeting the benchmark requirements for authenticity, McCormick’s lead was viewed by both Republicans and Democrats as insurmountable. Most of the outstanding ballots were in red counties, like Cambria. It was over, but Casey and lawyer Marc Elias were finding ways to steal it.An update on the PA Senate Recount: There's approximately ~50,000 potential ballots still to review. Philly is done. If trends hold at most there would be at most 40,000 valid ballots left to count most likely less. McCormick has a lead of 29,000 votes. Again no path for Casey.
— Mark Davin Harris (@markdharris) November 13, 2024In Bucks County, the Democratic commissioners obliged, defying the courts and declaring that illegal ballots would be counted. The Republicans’ legal team filed a challenge, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its ruling. They ordered the immediate cessation of counting illegal ballots in the totally unnecessary recount.The Democrat Bucks County Commissioners just voted to count misdated and undated mail in ballots to try and help Bob Casey and one of them straight up says that she knows it's illegal but simply does not care.
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 14, 2024
Dems are trying to steal an election in PA.pic.twitter.com/7KP4Qoy31bBREAKING: In case over undated/incorrectly dated mail ballots, the PA Supreme Court says the ballots “shall not be counted” for the Nov. 5 election. pic.twitter.com/C167Rb6jX3
— Carter Walker (@ByCarterWalker) November 18, 2024In case you missed it, this is what Pennsylvania Democrats wanted to get counted in this circus:It was a 7-0 decision not to count the votes that Casey and his D allies tried to slip through. This is a sad way for Senator Casey to end his career.
— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) November 18, 2024
He should have spoken out against this. So too should Governor Shapiro. https://t.co/vKVnsgtujOThe GOP stopped the steal.#Pennsylvania #Casey’s lawyers are actually in court arguing for the following “votes” to be counted: (1) ballots of NON-registered “voters;” (2) un-signed mail in ballots; (3) mail-in ballots w/o dates; (4) ballots cast in a county where the Voter does NOT live. #CmonMan🤦♂️ https://t.co/UQ0A4EM2CQ
— Guy Ciarrocchi (@PaSuburbsGuy) November 13, 2024
Or DID They?
You only favor tossing mail in ballots because Democrats use them more than republiturds. To you "stealing" is counting ballots mailed in by Democrats. No "steal" was stopped. If anything, a steal was facilitated. Ballots were thrown out because people misunderstood or did not carefully read the instructions.
ReplyDeleteSo what of the rule of law? Not important when it comes to winning? Count till you win!
DeleteDervy's angry because the Democrats got caught cheating.
DeleteHow were Democrats cheating, Mystere? Explain it to me. I bet you can't.
ReplyDeleterepublicans = stop counting when you win and throw out votes until you win.
They got caught counting invalid ballots, and then just kept counting them when told by their supreme court 3x to stop...
DeleteHence, "Count till you win" the Democrats motto.
"Invalid" because the voters that filled them out didn't date them correctly. They were still ballots submitted by people legitimately entitled to cast a ballot. republiturds are ALWAYS in favor of disenfranchising people for whatever reason works.
ReplyDeleteHence, "Throw out ballots till you win", the republican's motto.
There either are rules, or there aren't. They knew what the rules were in advance, and then f*cked their ballots up anyway. Contrary to DNC opinion, Epimetheus isn't the smarter brother.
DeleteBS. There are only rules for some people. For others the rules don't apply. Like d0n0ld tRump. The Supreme Court said many rules don't apply to him. Other rules should have leeway. Especially when it comes to taking the right to vote away from people. You're OK with it because it was more likely that those ballots were cast by Democrats. But some republicans no doubt had their ballots tossed. You're ok with that because overall you think the decision to disenfranchise people will favor the republican candidate.
ReplyDelete