Steve Bannon STOLE from tRump supporters. He took money from "we build the wall" and spent it bigly on himself. But that's probably a reason you admire him. You admitted previously that you think it's awesome that d0n0ld hustles crap "luxury products" like gold tennis shoes and rubes buy them.
She does. Obviously. Gifts/bribes are illegal. Unless the bribe comes after the desired action. Then, as per the corrupt scotus, the illegal bribe is magically transformed into a legal "tip".
That's really rich, accusing Steve Bannon of being a thief, when YOU steal identities and slander people, using those stolen identities, Dylan Anthony Dervish Mulvaney Sanders of Highway 69 in Paris Tennessee.
d0n0ld was already paid for the sale. Peter Thiel and Elon gave bigly to the "install d0n0ld and future predisent Vance" effort.
btw, some people speculate that the plan is to quickly get d0n0ld out and install Vance. Though you've said you don't trust him. But he could be predisent in short order if d0n0ld gets back in. He's going to be needing to be placed in a home eventually. I'm thinking sooner than later.
As for Steve Bannon, he is a criminal who should be in prison. And for a lot longer than the 4 month term he is currently serving. I don't mean as a "political prisoner", either. Taking political prisoners is d0n0ld's plan if he returns to the presidency. Or maybe dictator Vance will carry that out.
For sentences of under 1 year, good conduct time can waive as much as 50% of the original sentence. Persistent controversy over calculation of good conduct time in the United States was laid to rest in the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Barber v. Thomas (2010)
Me: The information about no federal parole for sentences of under a year is according to Barbara McQuade. She was wrong?
Copilot: Barbara McQuade's statement about no parole and no credit for good behavior for sentences under one year is accurate for the federal system. The Supreme Court case "Barber v. Thomas" clarified how good conduct time is calculated for sentences over one year. For sentences under one year, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) does not typically apply good conduct time credits.
In Steve Bannon's case, his four-month sentence means he is expected to serve the full term without the possibility of early release for good behavior. The decision to serve the full sentence is not up to the judge but follows federal guidelines and the BOP's policies.
Me: Bannon himself says he is eligible for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act of 2018. Does that apply to him?
Copilot: The First Step Act of 2018 allows federal inmates to earn time credits for participating in recidivism reduction programs and productive activities. However, eligibility for these credits depends on several factors, including the nature of the offense and the inmate's behavior while incarcerated.
Given that Steve Bannon's sentence is only four months, it's unlikely that he would be able to earn significant time credits under the First Step Act. The Act primarily benefits inmates with longer sentences who have more opportunities to participate in the required programs.
So, while Bannon might claim eligibility, the practical application of the First Step Act to his short sentence is limited. Anything else on your mind? [end copilot response].
Steve Bannon's sentence is too short for him to earn the necessary credits to decrease it.
I'll die soon enough. Are you looking forward to that day? I think Mystere is. But you'll just never hear from me again. You'll have no idea what happened. Unless you die first. Or quit blogging.
Steve Bannon STOLE from tRump supporters. He took money from "we build the wall" and spent it bigly on himself. But that's probably a reason you admire him. You admitted previously that you think it's awesome that d0n0ld hustles crap "luxury products" like gold tennis shoes and rubes buy them.
ReplyDeleteWho pays for Kamala's luxury value lifestyle?
Delete;p
DeleteShe does. Obviously. Gifts/bribes are illegal. Unless the bribe comes after the desired action. Then, as per the corrupt scotus, the illegal bribe is magically transformed into a legal "tip".
DeleteUS government 4 sale... enquire with Kamala....
DeleteThat's really rich, accusing Steve Bannon of being a thief, when YOU steal identities and slander people, using those stolen identities, Dylan Anthony Dervish Mulvaney Sanders of Highway 69 in Paris Tennessee.
Deleted0n0ld was already paid for the sale. Peter Thiel and Elon gave bigly to the "install d0n0ld and future predisent Vance" effort.
ReplyDeletebtw, some people speculate that the plan is to quickly get d0n0ld out and install Vance. Though you've said you don't trust him. But he could be predisent in short order if d0n0ld gets back in. He's going to be needing to be placed in a home eventually. I'm thinking sooner than later.
As for Steve Bannon, he is a criminal who should be in prison. And for a lot longer than the 4 month term he is currently serving. I don't mean as a "political prisoner", either. Taking political prisoners is d0n0ld's plan if he returns to the presidency. Or maybe dictator Vance will carry that out.
Bannon should be out for good behaviour. But the Democrats aren't following their own laws and rules in his case. They're hypocrits.
ReplyDeleteIn the federal system, there is no parole and no credit for good behavior for sentences under one year. link.
ReplyDeleteThe laws and rules are being followed.
For sentences of under 1 year, good conduct time can waive as much as 50% of the original sentence. Persistent controversy over calculation of good conduct time in the United States was laid to rest in the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Barber v. Thomas (2010)
ReplyDeleteThe Queen of incarceration has spoken.
ReplyDeleteMe: The information about no federal parole for sentences of under a year is according to Barbara McQuade. She was wrong?
ReplyDeleteCopilot: Barbara McQuade's statement about no parole and no credit for good behavior for sentences under one year is accurate for the federal system. The Supreme Court case "Barber v. Thomas" clarified how good conduct time is calculated for sentences over one year. For sentences under one year, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) does not typically apply good conduct time credits.
In Steve Bannon's case, his four-month sentence means he is expected to serve the full term without the possibility of early release for good behavior.
The decision to serve the full sentence is not up to the judge but follows federal guidelines and the BOP's policies.
Me: Bannon himself says he is eligible for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act of 2018. Does that apply to him?
Copilot: The First Step Act of 2018 allows federal inmates to earn time credits for participating in recidivism reduction programs and productive activities. However, eligibility for these credits depends on several factors, including the nature of the offense and the inmate's behavior while incarcerated.
Given that Steve Bannon's sentence is only four months, it's unlikely that he would be able to earn significant time credits under the First Step Act. The Act primarily benefits inmates with longer sentences who have more opportunities to participate in the required programs.
So, while Bannon might claim eligibility, the practical application of the First Step Act to his short sentence is limited. Anything else on your mind? [end copilot response].
Steve Bannon's sentence is too short for him to earn the necessary credits to decrease it.
Au contraire. He qualifies for compassionate release. He's 70.
DeleteIs he "dying" now too. Like that turd Julian Assange was "dying". But is now free and lying it up?
ReplyDeleteYou're not dying? You've found the fountain of youth? Is it in TN?
DeleteAnother qualifier - nonviolent 1st time offender. Another, victim of a law only ever enforced against Republicans.
Delete...our bureaucracy is too slow...
ReplyDeleteCompassionate release doesn't work that way.
ReplyDeleteI'll die soon enough. Are you looking forward to that day? I think Mystere is. But you'll just never hear from me again. You'll have no idea what happened. Unless you die first. Or quit blogging.
ReplyDelete