In late December of 1977, I was deported from Japan, having been injured in an accident aboard ship and treated for a hand injury in a Yokohama hospital. Landing on a PanAm 747 at SFO, I was confronted with a passenger collapsed and unconscious lying a few feet from the exit of the jetway. I looked around as deplaning passenger stepped around this slightly overweight mid 50's man, with concerned expression on all their faces, but with none offering assistance. I stopped and began to examine him, discerning that his breathing had stopped, and so exclaimed his non-breathing status to the nearest departing passengers and requesting that relay info to the cockpit and gate. My own right hand was bandaged, a fist ball of cotton bandages, as I was yet to receive a follow-up skin graft at the USPHS Seaman's Hospital in San Francisco. I immediately attempted CPR, but my hand prevented me from performing its' proper administration. Passengers continued passing by, watching my dilemma, but none stopping to assist. At one point, he threw up into my face, but my futile and incompetent attempts yielded the expected result. He died before competent medical personnel could arrive, roughly 20 minutes later.
I subsequently told myself that I should have stepped over or around his collapsed form so that perhaps a more competent form of aid could have been attempted or administered.
No.
ReplyDeleteMine was obviously "dangerous assistance"...
ReplyDeleteDarley and LatanΓ© (1968) conducted research on diffusion of responsibility.[24] The findings suggest that in the case of an emergency, when people believe that there are other people around, they are less likely or slower to help a victim because they believe someone else will take responsibility. People may also fail to take responsibility for a situation depending on the context. They may assume that other bystanders are more qualified to help, such as doctors or police officers, and that their intervention would be unneeded. They may also be afraid of being superseded by a superior helper, offering unwanted assistance, or facing the legal consequences of offering inferior and possibly dangerous assistance. For this reason, some legislations, such as "Good Samaritan Laws" limit liability for those attempting to provide medical services and non-medical services in an emergency.
Not only dangerous, but ultimately, "lethal".
ReplyDeleteThank you for your service and for mercy upon a man. God hasn't forgotten this.
Delete\\Darley and LatanΓ© (1968) conducted research on diffusion of responsibility.[24]
ReplyDeleteHoh... so that is how Uvalde Syndrome was named before...
What do the video and attached unattributed story have to do with the title of the post?
ReplyDeleteIs it a prediction that voters won't turn out to save democracy and donald tRump will get back in office? But they did in 2020. They turned out bigly to oust the Orange Turd.
This time everyone is going to hope everyone else shows up to vote so they don't have to bother? Is that what you think is going to happen? And that is how the Orange Turd will get back in and we will lose democracy?
Also, why did Mystere reply "no" anonymously instead of under my name?
πΊWow Ichabod Derpwood bin §atan ~ §ander$666! "π¨π¨π¨Also, why did Mystere reply 'no' anonymously instead of under my name?π¨π¨π¨" Your delusion of seeing Mystere here is getting worse. Your baseless accusations are getting old, Ichabod. You say so many stupid things here Ichabod, to the point that someone, probably you, posted no anonymously, so that you could have an excuse to attack Mystere for no reason at all, or to laugh at you if you got triggered. My bet is the former. You probably posted it just to make up an excuse to attack Mystere. By the way, how much are you charging rent for Mystere to live in your head? ππππππππππ
DeleteI looked around as deplaning passenger stepped around this slightly overweight mid 50's man, with concerned expression on all their faces, but with none offering assistance.
ReplyDeleteAll it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
ReplyDeleteSo much for good Samaritans, eh Dervy?
ReplyDelete"...but, but, but Orange Man Bad!"
ReplyDeleteAll it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. So much for good Samaritans, eh Dervy?
ReplyDeleteHuh? That's supposed to be an answer to the question I asked? Re: What does the post body (and video) have to do with the post title?
Obviously you aren't going to answer.
Minus: "...but, but, but Orange Man Bad!"
Yes. But hopefully enough voters turn out to vote. aka "offer assistance" to get rid of the Orange Turd once and for all.
It is a very good thing that the prosecutors and judges dealing with tRump are offering their assistance. Not shirking it due to fear of reprisals. From tRump's violent supporters. Or from his allies in government. Or from tRump himself -- if he gets back in office. MANY people are going to have to step up (offer their assistance) to save democracy from the Orange fascist threat.
3x and you're out, Dervy. Indifference.
ReplyDelete...and in your case, a self-serving one.
ReplyDeleteMinus: All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
ReplyDeleteIt seems you're banking on it. That enough voters do nothing and the Orange Turd gets back in office. Voting for a spoiler like rfkjr or some other 3rd party candidate -- that's also doing nothing to save democracy.
If evil triumphs you will be very happy.
Minus: ...and in your case, a self-serving one.
ReplyDeleteOf course. It isn't going to "serve" me if evil triumphs and donald tRump gets back in office. It won't serve you either. But that's what you want. Apparently you're so afraid of losing your White Supremacy that you will eagerly vote against your own interests. Well, many people are. Unfortunately.
The banality of evil most thoroughly eludes you Dervy. You've painted the veil directly on the canvas.
ReplyDeleteYou prefer the "in your face" evil of donald tRump?
ReplyDeleteYou obviously prefer this over an honest person:
Deletehttps://youtube.com/watch?v=9Y1ug-5WMpE&si=FQtntbyjU7JGfjMa
You should be ashamed of yourself, Ichabod.
What would you rather have, a corrupt president and an honest governmental system OR an honest president and a corrupt governmental system? Because we already HAVE a corrupt president AND a corrupt governmental system.
ReplyDeleteA corrupt flatulent pants pooping warmonger named Josef RobbingIt Bidet Junior and a corrupt governmental system makes Derwitch bin §atan ~ §ander$666 very happy.
Delete\\Blogger The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ You prefer the "in your face" evil of donald tRump?
And what so bad happened from 2016 till 2020???
Some war started? Some economic problems? Natural disasters???
\\Blogger Joe Conservative said...
\\ Not only dangerous, but ultimately, "lethal".
"Swiss Army Man". ;-P
\\Blogger -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...
\\ I looked around as deplaning passenger stepped around this slightly overweight mid 50's man, with concerned expression on all their faces, but with none offering assistance.
That can be just a culture of Japan.
To "not be involved".
\\So much for good Samaritans, eh Dervy?
Little you know... Samaritans -- they not Christians. ;-P
They not even Jews. :-)))))))))))))))0
\\MANY people are going to have to step up (offer their assistance) to save democracy from the Orange fascist threat.
Yep.
That's what DEMN totalitarians want to achieve.
Yawn.
\\Of course. It isn't going to "serve" me if evil triumphs and donald tRump gets back in office.
And you know it... because DEMN propaganda said it to you? ;-P
Isn't that self-serving of em? ;-P
OH'COUGHs... they would not like to loose POWER... but what it gives to all that miserly critters -- voters for DEMNs????
Seems like that cretins totally lost any ability to look for their own benefit.
Yawn.
Mystere: ...probably you, posted no anonymously, so that you could have an excuse to attack Mystere for no reason at all, or to laugh at you if you got triggered. My bet is the former. You probably posted it just to make up an excuse to attack Mystere.
ReplyDeleteI was not "triggered". And that "no" is yours. But you got the payoff you wanted. I guess. I replied. Which allowed you to post your stupidity.
Mystere: A corrupt flatulent pants pooping warmonger named Josef RobbingIt Bidet Junior and a corrupt governmental system makes Derwitch bin §atan ~ §ander$666 very happy.
Sure. I bet "Derwitch" is VERY happy. In your delusions. In reality no such persons exists. Neither The "Derwitch" you mention nor the "Josef" you say is "a corrupt flatulent pants pooping warmonger".
The corrupt farting pants pooper is donald tRump.
dotard donald is a "surrender monkey". A term republicans (your party) used to attack those who didn't support their warmongering under gwb. dotard donald surrendered in Afghanistan (which you falsely blame on Joe Biden). And he has plans to force a surrender in Ukraine (in support of his puppet master). Which you approve of.
Both you and Minus support Putin's warmongering. Qtard says he opposes it, but I doubt it. Given his support for Putin's puppet, donald tRump. (and no, I'm not referring to the imaginary "your alter ego Qtard").
Mystere: You should be ashamed of yourself, Ichabod.
Nobody using that handle has commented. Playing these moronic games should cause you to be ashamed, Mystere.
\\dotard donald is a "surrender monkey". A term republicans (your party) used to attack those who didn't support their warmongering under gwb. dotard donald surrendered in Afghanistan (which you falsely blame on Joe Biden). And he has plans to force a surrender in Ukraine (in support of his puppet master). Which you approve of.
ReplyDeleteBut.
Still.
That is Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.
Are one who said "Ukraine? They do not need planes"(and they STILL not sent).
And till the very last time demanded from Ukraine "do not shut onto RFia territory".
And even now, limited it only to cross-border territory.
While that RFia still free to attack ANY part and ALL territory of Ukraine. And with ANY kind of weapon. Up to bragging about using nukes.
So???
If that dRump is pro-surrender... so what this Bi-den, then???? %-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Seems like... NewSpeak lying BS, your this cretinic claim is.
\\(and no, I'm not referring to the imaginary "your alter ego Qtard").
Yep.
You lying... well, using NewSpeak here too. ;-P