Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Monday, March 4, 2024
Pay No Attention to Our Minor Data Adjustments...
We Also Just Need MORE Russian Economic Sanctions! We can't justify moving the US Economy to a CBDC without an URGENT Need to enforce THOSE (and eliminating donations to the Trump Campaign, RNC and NRA)
According to the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2022 was a bad year for the Russian economy. It is estimated that in 2022, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) dropped by 2.1%. link:-\
So, if the Russian government did release that data, you would say, yes we can totally trust it?
I saw the same figures from multiple sources. Well, same as I saw the Azov battalion Nazi story confirmed by multiple sources.
Proof that facts Qtard doesn't like are "Demn propaganda" or lies from a "trust me, I'm expert".
btw, Russia’s economy "in for very tough times" despite improved growth outlook, IMF managing director says. link
Qtard will probably say that is "fake" too. While it said nothing when Minus claimed the Russian economy is "booming". Because it hardly ever contradicts it's fellow Putin puppet. You think the Russian economy is booming, Qtard?
Sanctions are good for the Russian economy? Maybe they'll ask for more? They are regretting not asking to be sanctioned sooner?
Qtard: But... you are cretin, and you will NOT -- because you ONLY capable in sucking propaganda... from "multiple sources".
Checking many sources is what to do to detect propaganda. But Qtard dunno anything about how to do that. Because IT determines what is "propaganda" based on if IT likes the story or dislikes it. Disliking means it is "propaganda".
According to the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2022 was a bad year for the Russian economy. It is estimated that in 2022, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) dropped by 2.1%. link :-\
ReplyDeleteProblem with your argument, Derv, is that it's now 2024.
ReplyDeleteIt always takes awhile to collect and analyze data. You never noticed that?
ReplyDeleteYou mean like "Russia-Russia"?
ReplyDeleteSome people just like the FRESH taste of bullsh*t.
ReplyDeleteGo Google cretin -- HOW value of GDP is counted.
ReplyDeleteThen... go Google for RFia legislation... which PROHIBITs sharing such data.
Means... that "Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) dropped by 2.1%. link :-\"
is TOTAL FAKE.
Qtard: is TOTAL FAKE.
ReplyDeleteSo, if the Russian government did release that data, you would say, yes we can totally trust it?
I saw the same figures from multiple sources. Well, same as I saw the Azov battalion Nazi story confirmed by multiple sources.
Proof that facts Qtard doesn't like are "Demn propaganda" or lies from a "trust me, I'm expert".
btw, Russia’s economy "in for very tough times" despite improved growth outlook, IMF managing director says. link
Qtard will probably say that is "fake" too. While it said nothing when Minus claimed the Russian economy is "booming". Because it hardly ever contradicts it's fellow Putin puppet. You think the Russian economy is booming, Qtard?
Sanctions are good for the Russian economy? Maybe they'll ask for more? They are regretting not asking to be sanctioned sooner?
\\So, if the Russian government did release that data, you would say, yes we can totally trust it?
ReplyDeleteRAW DATA... much more HARDER to forge.
While that "2.1%" figure... I was obseerving how it was formed in real-time.
When liliPut AT FiRST babbled that fall are more then 5%...
Then... MAGICVALLY... is became "less then 3%".
Then... "2 and something".
And in the end it ended on that "psychological" number. Like... it LOWEST of ONE digit numbers.
And that... happened on span on couple months.
And... RFia/USSR/Russian Empire have RICH tradition of making FAKES about own "prosperity".
Like just recently -- that YET MAGICLY, LOWERED number of poor in their country...
with same forgery of statistics. ;-P
\\I saw the same figures from multiple sources. Well, same as I saw the Azov battalion Nazi story confirmed by multiple sources.
Yeah. That is KNOWN fact. Even on the West. By today.
That RFia trying to spread liliPut's Propaganda... AS WIDE AS POSSIBLE.
GO READ something Bi-den or his minions saying about liliPut Propaganda, for god's sake.
But... you are cretin, and you will NOT -- because you ONLY capable in sucking propaganda... from "multiple sources".
Yak! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\btw, Russia’s economy "in for very tough times" despite improved growth outlook, IMF managing director says. link
Yeah.
Propaganda.
Not based on knowing REAL data.
Well... RFia is now in state of War... on the track to Total War economy.
Means... that "IMF managing director" is just a cretin that DUNNO what it talking about.
As that is LOST knowledge... about WW2 war econbomies... in Hitler's Germany, in Japan... in USSR... and USA.
Qtard: But... you are cretin, and you will NOT -- because you ONLY capable in sucking propaganda... from "multiple sources".
ReplyDeleteChecking many sources is what to do to detect propaganda. But Qtard dunno anything about how to do that. Because IT determines what is "propaganda" based on if IT likes the story or dislikes it. Disliking means it is "propaganda".
\\Checking many sources is what to do to detect propaganda.
ReplyDeleteFor that... one need to UNDERSTAND what FACTS is.
And be able to discern FACT from non-facts.
With LOGIC. ;-P
But...
\\But Qtard dunno anything about how to do that.
YOU are correct. YOU dunno "about how to do that." ;-P
\\Because IT determines what is "propaganda" based on if IT likes the story or dislikes it.
Yeah.
U R. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
IT. ;-P
ReplyDeleteQtard: For that... one need to UNDERSTAND what FACTS is. And be able to discern FACT from non-facts. With LOGIC.
ReplyDeleteYeah. You/IT dunno how to do that. Because you dunno what facts or logic are.
Obvious self-revelation of IT... with usual habitual substituting "I" with "you".
ReplyDeleteYawn. ;-p