The transition council is supposed to comprise seven voting members representing key political and private-sector forces in Haiti. It has been tasked with selecting an interim prime minister and nominating an “inclusive” cabinet.
That was your comment, not mine. How did you determine what I think from YOUR comment? I don't think that anyone meant that. But, if that is what it means, then wouldn't they say YES to that "inclusion"? I assumed the answer to your question was no. But you say it's yes? So why did you laugh?
That was my comment, btw. Forgot to add my name. I dunno why Google won't let me sign into my account on my phone. I can't even comment on my own blog unless I'm using my PC.
I laughed because of your first comment on this thread expressing the thought that the "inclusivity" would not include "gangsters".
You do know what "context" means, right? Deconstruction may be your preferred means of avoiding context so that you can provide your selective judgements and deny facts that don't support your narrative, but it's not mine.
\\Blogger -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...
\\ You do know what "context" means, right?
No... IT -- do not.
Yawn.
\\Deconstruction may be your preferred means of avoiding context so that you can provide your selective judgements and deny facts that don't support your narrative, but it's not mine.
Naaaah.
Too complex method to use... for such a cretin.
IT... is just like Poppy parrot -- repeating what propaganda chants.
Minus: ...deny facts that don't support your narrative...
What facts? You haven't given any "facts" about negotiations between Haitian gangs and the Biden administration to put the Haitian gangs in control of the Haitian government.
WHY I watched the video. I don't watch every video you post. But I did want to see if the video mentioned the alleged negotiations you referenced previously. But they were not mentioned. Because there aren't any such negotiations, yes?
Qtard: \\ You do know what "context" means, right?\\ No... IT -- do not.
Qtard's admission about it's alter ego, "IT".
Another admission about IT's alter ego "cretin" follows.
IT says that it's alter ego "cretin" likes propaganda chants. Maybe like "stop the steal"? Why IT keeps insisting that storming the Capitol to try and reverse the results of the just-held election was a "human right"?
The gangs ARE in control of Haiti and ARE the de facto "government". The real question is, can Sleepy Joe and the Global Gang do anything to reverse the facts on the ground? IMO, it ain't happening.
It cannot admit fact... even if it will fall on it's head. (like it tried to OPPOSE visible fact that "Sun is... in the sky")
\\fyi, Qtard... Getting rid of democracy is a human rights violation.
Yeah...
like NOT allowing people to enter public building and ask questions about elections... and calling em "insurrectionists"... and even DENYING em having Human Rights.
That is DEFINITE Human Right Violation -- TRY to get rid of... literally Rule of the People. ;-P
Q, did you know that what Pigloser did was from an old FDR WW2 blueprint FDR & General John DeWitt created in the late 30s in a plot to deport all Japanese from North, Central and South America? Pigloser's pappy Thomas D'Allesandro Sr was privy to FDR's plot and passed down the information to Nanshee later on. Nanshee's pappy hated the Japanese as much as DeWitt and FDR did. A son of a Navajo code talker told me and my friend Mystere back in 1982 about the plot FDR had hatched with General John DeWitt in 1938 to deport the Japanese from all the Americas. This Navajo man had a Japanese wife he married in the 1950s. The code talker's son served in the Korean War in Okinawa. He met his wife in Japan, and she came to the US as his bride. He saw fit to tell me and Mystere about this. What I see going on with J6 is similar to how the Japanese got treated during WW2.
Minus: btw - Per dervy's link - 1st world Neoliberal values (democracy) = human rights.
I don't see anything about neoliberalism on that page. You see democracy as being neoliberal? Why you want to get rid of it? Make donald tRump president for life?
Qtard: That is DEFINITE Human Right Violation...
No.
Qtard: TRY to get rid of... literally Rule of the People.
Your NewSpeak -- "literally Rule of the People" that's a minority of sore losers overthrowing democracy. Getting RID of rule by The People.
Qtard: Totally totalitarian creed you chanting -- that INDIVIDUALS... doesn't matter, have no rights.
That's the totalitarian creed that YOU are chanting. Saying individuals in the minority can decide for everyone else, take away their rights using violence. It's their "human right" to get rid of the election winner Joe Biden and replace him with a "president for life" donald tRump (guy who LOST the election).
I watched the video. It said nothing about the Biden administration supposedly negotiating with Haiti's gangs to turn the government over to them.
ReplyDeleteThe transition council is supposed to comprise seven voting members representing key political and private-sector forces in Haiti. It has been tasked with selecting an interim prime minister and nominating an “inclusive” cabinet.
ReplyDeleteOk. So they aren't. Thanks for confirming.
ReplyDeleteYou really think that the gangs in Haiti care about DEI? LOL!
ReplyDelete"Not my business"... I suppose. ;-P
ReplyDeleteYou can weigh in... think Haiti's new government will be filled with gangsters?
ReplyDeleteMinus: You really think that the gangs in Haiti care about DEI? LOL!
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking to? Someone said they think that? Did that person's comment go to spam?
It's still there... nothing went to spam. You think that "inclusive" means diversity. it does. An "inclusive" diversity of GANG leaders.
ReplyDeleteThat was your comment, not mine. How did you determine what I think from YOUR comment? I don't think that anyone meant that. But, if that is what it means, then wouldn't they say YES to that "inclusion"? I assumed the answer to your question was no. But you say it's yes? So why did you laugh?
ReplyDeleteThat was my comment, btw. Forgot to add my name. I dunno why Google won't let me sign into my account on my phone. I can't even comment on my own blog unless I'm using my PC.
ReplyDelete:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
ReplyDeleteI laughed because of your first comment on this thread expressing the thought that the "inclusivity" would not include "gangsters".
ReplyDeleteYou do know what "context" means, right? Deconstruction may be your preferred means of avoiding context so that you can provide your selective judgements and deny facts that don't support your narrative, but it's not mine.
Dervy's phone....
ReplyDeleteThat's hilarious!
Delete\\Blogger -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...
ReplyDelete\\ You do know what "context" means, right?
No... IT -- do not.
Yawn.
\\Deconstruction may be your preferred means of avoiding context so that you can provide your selective judgements and deny facts that don't support your narrative, but it's not mine.
Naaaah.
Too complex method to use... for such a cretin.
IT... is just like Poppy parrot -- repeating what propaganda chants.
Yawn.
Minus: ...deny facts that don't support your narrative...
ReplyDeleteWhat facts? You haven't given any "facts" about negotiations between Haitian gangs and the Biden administration to put the Haitian gangs in control of the Haitian government.
WHY I watched the video. I don't watch every video you post. But I did want to see if the video mentioned the alleged negotiations you referenced previously. But they were not mentioned. Because there aren't any such negotiations, yes?
Qtard: \\ You do know what "context" means, right?\\ No... IT -- do not.
Qtard's admission about it's alter ego, "IT".
Another admission about IT's alter ego "cretin" follows.
IT says that it's alter ego "cretin" likes propaganda chants. Maybe like "stop the steal"? Why IT keeps insisting that storming the Capitol to try and reverse the results of the just-held election was a "human right"?
fyi, Qtard... Getting rid of democracy is a human rights violation.
The gangs ARE in control of Haiti and ARE the de facto "government". The real question is, can Sleepy Joe and the Global Gang do anything to reverse the facts on the ground? IMO, it ain't happening.
ReplyDeletebtw - Per dervy's link - 1st world Neoliberal values (democracy) = human rights. What a bunch of maroons!
ReplyDeleteDerpish is a commietard
Delete\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Minus: ...deny facts that don't support your narrative...
\\ What facts?
SEE!!!
What I mean -- and IT confirmed it in a jiffy -- cretin DUNNO what FACTS is!
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
It cannot admit fact... even if it will fall on it's head. (like it tried to OPPOSE visible fact that "Sun is... in the sky")
\\fyi, Qtard... Getting rid of democracy is a human rights violation.
Yeah...
like NOT allowing people to enter public building and ask questions about elections... and calling em "insurrectionists"... and even DENYING em having Human Rights.
That is DEFINITE Human Right Violation -- TRY to get rid of... literally Rule of the People. ;-P
Q, did you know that what Pigloser did was from an old FDR WW2 blueprint FDR & General John DeWitt created in the late 30s in a plot to deport all Japanese from North, Central and South America? Pigloser's pappy Thomas D'Allesandro Sr was privy to FDR's plot and passed down the information to Nanshee later on. Nanshee's pappy hated the Japanese as much as DeWitt and FDR did. A son of a Navajo code talker told me and my friend Mystere back in 1982 about the plot FDR had hatched with General John DeWitt in 1938 to deport the Japanese from all the Americas. This Navajo man had a Japanese wife he married in the 1950s. The code talker's son served in the Korean War in Okinawa. He met his wife in Japan, and she came to the US as his bride. He saw fit to tell me and Mystere about this. What I see going on with J6 is similar to how the Japanese got treated during WW2.
DeleteMinus: btw - Per dervy's link - 1st world Neoliberal values (democracy) = human rights.
ReplyDeleteI don't see anything about neoliberalism on that page. You see democracy as being neoliberal? Why you want to get rid of it? Make donald tRump president for life?
Qtard: That is DEFINITE Human Right Violation...
No.
Qtard: TRY to get rid of... literally Rule of the People.
Your NewSpeak -- "literally Rule of the People" that's a minority of sore losers overthrowing democracy. Getting RID of rule by The People.
Assface Derpish better pull his head out of the gay fatso's cracks before he ends up giving his butt buddy an enema and colonoscopy simultaneously.
Delete\\Your NewSpeak -- "literally Rule of the People" that's a minority of sore losers overthrowing democracy. Getting RID of rule by The People.
ReplyDeleteYeah.
Totally totalitarian creed you chanting -- that INDIVIDUALS... doesn't matter, have no rights.
While some voiceless masses can be packed and hauled and directed to go in straight rows.
Like liliPut now doing... after gaining strength with DEMN-Ok-ratsy -- totally faked elections, to direct millions whenever it wants.
Totalitarian plot... is all the same.
ReplyDeleteYawn.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteQtard: Totally totalitarian creed you chanting -- that INDIVIDUALS... doesn't matter, have no rights.
ReplyDeleteThat's the totalitarian creed that YOU are chanting. Saying individuals in the minority can decide for everyone else, take away their rights using violence. It's their "human right" to get rid of the election winner Joe Biden and replace him with a "president for life" donald tRump (guy who LOST the election).