Sunday, February 4, 2024

Ukraine - The Navel Gazing of the Analysts

The Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is a think tank in Washington, D.C. specializing in United States national security issues, including terrorism, irregular warfare, the future of the U.S. military, the emergence of Asia as a global power center, war games pitting the U.S. against the People's Republic of China,[2] and the national security implications of natural resource consumption, among others.[3]

CNAS has strong ties to the Democratic Party. It was founded in 2007 by Michèle Flournoy, who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy under President Bill Clinton and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy under President Barack Obama,[4] and Kurt M. Campbell, who serves as Coordinator for Indo-Pacific Affairs under President Joe Biden.[5] The Obama administration hired several CNAS employees for key positions.[6] In June 2009, The Washington Post reported, "In the era of Obama... the Center for a New American Security may emerge as Washington's go-to think tank on military affairs."[6] Other CNAS advisors have included John Nagl,[7] David Kilcullen, Andrew Exum, Thomas E. Ricks, Robert D. Kaplan,[8] and Marc Lynch. CNAS was formerly led by CEO Victoria Nuland, who serves as Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs in the Biden administration's State Department.

CNAS has received funding from large corporations, including defense contractors. Donors have included Northrop Grumman, Chevron, Amazon, and Google,[9] This has prompted criticism of CNAS from left-wing media outlets, with In These Times saying in October 2019 that the organization has "long pushed Democrats to embrace war and militarism."[10]
 
Employees, budget, and writings[edit]

CNAS has approximately 30 employees and a budget under $6 million.[11] The organization's top donors include Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems, Open Society Foundations, Airbus Group, The Boeing Company, Chevron Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Raytheon Company, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office, the United States government, BAE Systems, BP America and Exxon Mobil Corporation.[12]

CNAS commentators have been quoted in numerous national media outlets, including Foreign Policy,[13] The New York Times,[14] The Washington Post,[15] The Wall Street Journal,[16] The National Interest,[17] The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,[18] C-SPAN,[19] NBC and MSNBC,[20] Fox News,[21] NPR,[22] CNN,[23] and PBS.[24]
Research and initiatives[edit]
 
Hillary Clinton speaks at CNAS's rollout event, June 2007

CNAS has released extensive reports on terrorism, irregular warfare, and regional security challenges.[citation needed]

Before joining CNAS, John Nagl served as an active-duty officer in both the first Gulf War and in Operation Iraqi Freedom. He then was part of the team that wrote FM 3-24, the Army's counter-insurgency field manual that changed the way the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were conducted. Since joining CNAS first as a Senior Fellow and then as President, Nagl has continued to delve into counterinsurgency while also publishing papers on other topics, including the need for a permanent corps of Army advisers[25] and strategies for confronting Islamic extremism.[26]

CNAS has also staked out the terrain in studying the emergence of Asia as a center of global power, particularly with regards to China. One of the main stated goals of CNAS's Asia-Pacific Security program is to "devise a future path for America's engagement of China that can expand bilateral cooperation in areas of shared strategic interest and encourage increasing accountability from the Chinese regime."[27]

In 2008-2009, CNAS pushed environmental security, especially on climate change and energy. The organization released a report in 2009 called "Natural Security" by Senior Fellow Sharon Burke, which looked at the national security context for natural resources, including energy, critical minerals, land, water, biodiversity, and climate change. CNAS continues to lead on such research with Elizabeth Rosenberg, a former Treasury Department official who runs the Energy, Economics, and Security Program.[citation needed]

The CNAS U.S.-India Initiative is co-chaired by CNAS Board of Directors members Richard Armitage, former Deputy Secretary of State, and Ambassador R. Nicholas Burns, former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The stated goal of the Initiative is to help advance growing bilateral ties in areas of mutual interest, including security, economics, energy, climate change, democracy, and human rights.[28] On October 27, 2010, at the White House Press Gaggle on the President's Upcoming Trip to India, the CNAS report Natural Allies: A Blueprint for the Future of U.S.-India Relations was referenced in a reporter's question to White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.[29]
 
Gen. Martin E. Dempsey speaking at CNAS, November 2014

In 2010, the Center developed its Cyber Security project, which is co-chaired by Bob Kahn, the co-inventor of the TCP/IP protocols used to transmit information over the Internet; Vice Admiral John Michael McConnell, USN (Ret.), former Director of National Intelligence; Joseph Nye, Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard University; and Peter Schwartz, a futurist and business strategist and member of the CNAS Board of Directors.[30] In February 2011, CNAS Vice President and Director of Studies Kristin Lord and Research Associate Travis Sharp argued in The Hill that "increased federal attention to cybersecurity makes good sense," but "lawmakers must ensure that the U.S. government does not spend aimlessly on cybersecurity."[31]

CNAS has suggested that one way to contain future military costs would be to move heavy army units into the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Still, military officials have responded that the governors would rather have light units that are better suited to their emergency needs.[32]
 
Papers for the Next President Series[edit]

In May 2016, CNAS launched its Papers for the Next President series to assist the next president and his team in crafting a strong, pragmatic, and principled national security agenda. The series explores the critical regions and topics that the next president will need to address early in his tenure and includes actionable recommendations designed to be implemented during the first few months of 2017. Since its inception, CNAS has released 12 reports[33] on topics including U.S.-Russia Relations,[34] transatlantic security cooperation in the Asia-Pacific,[35] and U.S. strategy in the Middle East.[36]
Funding and controversy[edit]

Shortly after CNAS formed, it was noted by the Wall Street Journal and others that it was "rapidly emerging as a top farm team for the incoming Obama administration."[37] This was concerning[to whom?] since nearly 30 defense contractors, including Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon; NATO; several foreign governments, including Taiwan and United Arab Emirates; the oil companies BP and Chevron; investment banks including Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase; technology firms, such as Facebook, Google, and Microsoft; the U.S. Department of State, and two different Pentagon offices primarily fund the organization—creating a conflict of interest.[38][according to whom?][dead link]

When co-founder, Kurt Campbell, was questioned by Jim Webb before Congress about the potential for conflict, he replied, "We've kept a very clear line. Not one of our publications, not one of our public advocacies ever touches on anything that these companies worked on."[39] However, according to a report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research's Revolving Door Project, the Center has repeatedly violated its own ethics policy without acknowledgement of the violations.[40] For example, CNAS received $100,000 to $249,999 in funding from Taiwan in the fiscal years preceding a 2020 report to Washington on "Rising to the China Challenge," where they advised America should invest "considerable amounts of money, senior-level attention, and bureaucratic focus" to, among other things, "strengthen its diplomatic and security relationship with Taiwan.[41][42]

CNAS has a board of advisors in addition to its board of directors that "actively contributes to the development of the Center's research and expands [their] community of interest," with members who "engage regularly with the intellectual power generated at CNAS, though they do not have official governance or fiduciary oversight responsibilities."[43] Many advisory board members have donated to CNAS in prior years.[40][44]

In addition, many involved in CNAS go on to become government employees. For example Victoria Nuland, who was the former CEO of CNAS, is President Biden's current Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs.[45] In one article she published after leaving the CNAS, she called for increased defense spending and weapons development, as well as to "establish permanent bases along NATO's eastern border."[46] The governments of two nations on NATO's eastern border, Latvia and Lithuania, are recent contributors to CNAS. [38]

CNAS received and returned funds from FTX.

h/t - Woodsterman 

27 comments:

  1. CNAS needs to be taken out, and its members must be tried for treason.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Must"? But they aren't going to be, Mystere.

    Quote: Carlton F. W. Larson, a treason scholar and law professor at the University of California, Davis ... wrote in his book “On Treason: A Citizen's Guide to the Law", from 2020, that the Framers "had a very specific image in mind—men gathering with guns, forming an army, and marching on the seat of government". Few events in American history, if any, have matched that description as clearly as the insurrection of January 6th, which, court documents suggest, was planned by milita members who may have intended to capture elected officials.

    If some of those who attacked the Capitol assembled in order to incapacitate Congress -- perhaps even by kidnapping or killing lawmakers -- then their actions could be construed as an attempt to overthrow the government, and federal prosecutors could plausibly consider treason charges. As Larson put it, "At some point, you have to say, if that's not levying war against the United States, then what on earth is?"...

    ...a treason case against Trump himself might conceivably be built, if prosecutors could establish that he knew in advance that his supporters planned to violently assault the Capitol, rather than peacefully protest; that he intended his speech urging them to "fight harder" to spur them to attack Congress imminently; and that he purposely didn't do anything to stop the insurrection while it was unfolding -- or, worse, intentionally contributed to a security failure that led to the breach. Then Trump would have engaged in treason along with supporters who attempted, in his name, to overthrow the US government. (January 28, 2021)

    donald tRump needs to be taken out, and his followers must be tried for treason*.

    *I use the word "must" the same way Mystere uses it. To refer to something that isn't going to happen. Even though, in the case of dotard donald, it SHOULD happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it should happen in the case of Donald Trump. The election thief Joseph Robinet Biden Junior, the fake pResident, must be taken out and brought to justice along with every member of his crime clan, except for the prostitute who bore his youngest and illegitimate grandchild. She has nothing to do with it, and must raise the granddaughter, lest the infection of evil germinates in her. The other grandkids, nieces and nephews are guilty of aiding and abetting acts of treason.

      Delete
    2. Mystere calls the legitimate winner of the 2020 election a "thief". And he demands that the legitimate winner be punished.

      Qtard keeps babbling about totalitarian lovers, but won't say anything about Mystere's just stated desire to impose fake "justice" upon Joe Biden.

      Because Joe Biden beat the wannabe tyrant donald tRump in a democratic election. Despite dotard donald's cheating.

      Delete
  3. Dervish Sanders calls the thief in the office a legitimate leader. Dervish calls every humiliating Biden gaffe a propaganda video created by right wing extremists.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How desperate to prove election integrity do you have to be to deliberately violate the 1st Amendment?

    ReplyDelete
  5. ...oh, it's okay... just so long has your intentions are pure. @@

    ReplyDelete
  6. \\Because Joe Biden beat the wannabe tyrant donald tRump in a democratic election. Despite dotard donald's cheating.

    Yeah.

    Bi-den is "leader of free world" and "lighthouse of democracy"... though it using EVERY possible way to stumble his political opponent: propaganda smearing campagns, unjust trials and etc... SAME what tyrants of all World do to their political opponents: accusation in revolt/insurrection -- checked, Erdogan, accusation in some "seemingly legitimate crimes" -- checked, liliPut...

    dRump -- opposition leader that going through legitimate democratic process... while trying to back off all dirty tricks -- is "wannabe tyrant".

    Children.

    Look at this cretin and propaganda puppet.

    Do not be like that cretin(s).

    DEMNs. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well...

    what is for sure -- EVERY NEXT POTUS -- after his term, will be put on trial.

    Because USA court said -- that presidential protection... is void.

    Another word.

    No end of fun.

    In coming years. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mystere: Dervish Sanders calls the thief in the office a legitimate leader.

    donald tRump is no longer in office, Mystere. I never called donald tRump the legitimate president.

    Mystere: Dervish calls every humiliating Biden gaffe a propaganda video created by right wing extremists.

    That is your delusion, Mystere. I have never claimed that Joe Biden makes zero gaffs. Joe Biden makes an occasional gaff. dotard donald tRump makes FAR more. Due to being extremely stupid. And due to his growing dementia.

    Minus: How desperate to prove election integrity do you have to be to deliberately violate the 1st Amendment?

    Acting United States Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf was desperate for dotard donald's victory not to be questioned?

    Qtard: \\Because Joe Biden beat the wannabe tyrant donald tRump in a democratic election\\
    Yeah. Bi-den is "leader of free world" and "lighthouse of democracy"...

    Qtard thinks that, prior to the 2020 election, Joe Biden was the leader of the free world? How did that happen, Qtard? It was donald tRump versus Hillary Clinton in 2016. Yet Qtard thinks Joe Biden was secretly president from 2017 to January 2021. Somehow?

    Qtard: though it using EVERY possible way to stumble his political opponent: propaganda smearing campagns, unjust trials and etc...

    Lie. donald tRump is being prosecuted by the independent DOJ and independent state AGs. Joe Biden has maintained his distance and is not involved in these prosecutions.

    Qtard: SAME what tyrants of all World do to their political opponents: accusation in revolt/insurrection -- checked, Erdogan, accusation in some "seemingly legitimate crimes" -- checked, liliPut...

    Lie. Lawbreaking politicians are prosecuted by Democracies. Like former French presidents Jacques Chirac (found guilty of embezzling public funds to illegally finance his political party) and Nicolas Sarkozy (sentenced to prison for corruption and influence peddling in 2021).

    And Israeli PM Ben Nuttenyahoo has been indicted on corruption charges, including fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes. The corruption trial is underway even as Nuttenyahoo sits in his country's most powerful office. He would be forced to step down if he's found guilty (see here for more examples).

    The prosecution of donald tRump is like the prosecutions in France and Israel. The prosecution of donald tRump is NOT like the sham prosecution of Alexei Navalny in Russia.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Qtard: dRump -- opposition leader that going through legitimate democratic process... while trying to back off all dirty tricks -- is "wannabe tyrant".

    donald tRump is going through a legitimate process to hold him accountable for his crimes.

    dotard donald is not "trying to back off all dirty tricks". Dirty trick of blocking a border reform bill to make Biden look bad -- check. Dirty trick of trying to get out of his legitimate prosecutions by running for president (then instructing the DOJ to dismiss all charges against him after he wins) -- check. Dirty trick of falsely framing his legitimate prosecutions as "election interference" that Joe Biden is directing the DOJ to bring against him -- check.

    Qtard: children. Look at this cretin and propaganda puppet. Do not be like that cretin(s).

    "Cretin and propaganda puppet" describes Qtard. Parroting Putin's and dotard donald's false narrative that Joe Biden is politically persecuting his opponent. Instead of dotard donald being held accountable for his crimes. Which is what is happening.

    Qtard: DEMNs. ;-P

    republiturds. Putin and his republiturd puppets.

    Qtard: Well... what is for sure -- EVERY NEXT POTUS -- after his term, will be put on trial. Because USA court said -- that presidential protection... is void.

    Only the criminal ones like donald tRump. Or innocent ones if a corrupt president is in office. Like if dotard donald gets back in. He has already stated that he is going after his enemies.

    Qtard: Another word. No end of fun. In coming years.

    Yeah. The totalitarian Qtard views this as "fun". Because it is looking forward to "president for life" donald tRump persecuting his enemies. As Putin persecuted his opponent Alexei Navalny. No doubt Qtard considers Navalny's jailing "fun". IT will be very happy if dotard donald gets back in office and directs the DOJ to prosecute Democrats like Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden for bogus crimes. Maybe for "framing" dotard donald for colluding with his master, Putin. Also for "stealing" the 2020 election.

    Your bigly admirer, the imbecile Mystere, thinks this will happen. And that the Clintons (including their daughter, her husband and their young children), Barack Obama and Joe Biden (and probably his son and brother) will all be sent to Gitmo, face military tribunals and be executed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. \\Lie. Lawbreaking politicians are prosecuted by Democracies. Like former French presidents Jacques Chirac (found guilty of embezzling public funds to illegally finance his political party) and Nicolas Sarkozy (sentenced to prison for corruption and influence peddling in 2021).

    Was they opposition politics in time of campaign?


    \\The prosecution of donald tRump is like the prosecutions in France and Israel. The prosecution of donald tRump is NOT like the sham prosecution of Alexei Navalny in Russia.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. And I am cretin who believe such DEMN propaganda.

    Naaah. Not me, you are. ;-P

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\donald tRump is going through a legitimate process to hold him accountable for his crimes.

    Yeah.

    And that is what makes him eligible to be called tyrant, in eyes of cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Because... that's what happens with tyrants all of the time -- there is sham court trials happen, and they going from one courts to another. Fighting in that court with their lawyers and counter-evidences.

    THAT IS... why we call em "tyrants" for.

    SARCASM!!!! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))




    \\dotard donald is not "trying to back off all dirty tricks". Dirty trick of blocking a border reform bill to make Biden look bad -- check. Dirty trick of trying to get out of his legitimate prosecutions by running for president (then instructing the DOJ to dismiss all charges against him after he wins) -- check. Dirty trick of falsely framing his legitimate prosecutions as "election interference" that Joe Biden is directing the DOJ to bring against him -- check.

    Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

    Coda of Totalitarianism -- ALL must admit defeat and stand still in awe.

    Before "non-totalitarian" DEMN-OK-ratsy.



    \\"Cretin and propaganda puppet" describes Qtard. Parroting Putin's and dotard donald's false narrative that Joe Biden is politically persecuting his opponent.

    So?

    When Bi-den... after losing elections... will be put on trial.

    You will not be screaming "that is political presecution"???

    Naaaah. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0



    ReplyDelete
  11. Qtard: Was they opposition politics in time of campaign?

    Ben Nuttenyahoo is the CURRENT PM. Maybe his opposition rigged it so he'd be prosecuted?

    Qtard thinks running for president (or any office) gives the person running a free pass to commit crimes?

    Qtard: \\The prosecution of donald tRump is NOT like the sham prosecution of Alexei Navalny in Russia\\ Yeah, yeah, yeah. And I am cretin who believe such DEMN propaganda.

    Fact. But Qtard doesn't like this fact. So it chooses to not believe it. err... KNOW it. Facts Qtard does not like can't be known.

    Qtard: Naaah. Not me, you are.

    "You are"... what? Believer in propaganda? I'm not. I am a knower of facts.

    Qtard: \\donald tRump is going through a legitimate process to hold him accountable for his crimes\\ Yeah. And that is what makes him eligible to be called tyrant, in eyes of cretin.

    No, not in your eyes. In *my* eyes. Because I know the facts. Like the fact that donald tRump sent his magaturd minions to the Capitol to try and stop the certification of Joe Biden's legitimate win. He tried to get his VP to raise objections to electors in states where cheating was falsely alleged. So he could remain president. After he LOST.

    Qtard: Because... that's what happens with tyrants all of the time -- there is sham court trials happen, and they going from one courts to another. Fighting in that court with their lawyers and counter-evidences.

    Yes. Tyrants do that. And Democracies do it too. Tyrants direct sham trials against opponents. Democracies charge lawbreaking politicians for crimes committed. Give them their day in court to prove their innocence. Or be found guilty. Like in the examples I gave.

    Qtard: THAT IS... why we call em "tyrants" for. SARCASM!!!!

    Joe Biden is a tyrant? Even though he left it to his independent AG to decide? And that AG assigned the decision to an independent prosecutor. So the decision was twice removed from Joe Biden? Of COURSE Qtard would still claim the prosecution is at the direction of Joe Biden. Even though the facts say otherwise. But only because that is the false narrative it likes.

    Qtard: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Coda of Totalitarianism -- ALL must admit defeat and stand still in awe. Before "non-totalitarian" DEMN-OK-ratsy.

    Nobody is going stand in "awe" of "Demn-ok-ratsy". Because there is no such thing. It only exists in Qtard's delusions. "Demn-ok-ratsy" is what the democracy hater Qtard calls it if Democrats win. It wants the Putin puppet donald tRump installed.

    Qtard: So? When Bi-den... after losing elections... will be put on trial. You will not be screaming "that is political presecution"???

    But Joe Biden is going to win, not lose. After he leaves office (because presidents can only serve two terms) WHY would he be prosecuted? He didn't do anything he could be prosecuted for. Not that I'm aware of.

    Qtard: Naaaah.

    No, I won't. "political presecution" isn't even a thing. If dotard donald somehow becomes president? Then yes, I WILL say it is political persecution (not "presecution"). Because donald tRump SAID he was going to make retribution a priority. As opposed to justice for wrongdoing. Retribution, not justice. donald tRump's words.

    btw, YOU'RE the one screaming "that is political presecution". About dotard donald tRump. He is being "presecuted". According to you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...

    \\ Qtard: Was they opposition politics in time of campaign?

    \\ Ben Nuttenyahoo is the CURRENT PM. Maybe his opposition rigged it so he'd be prosecuted?

    Yeah... only cretin could come up with such an idea.

    That's why I listening to this cretin -- to observe how cretinic brains work. :-))))

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\Fact. But Qtard doesn't like this fact. So it chooses to not believe it. err... KNOW it. Facts Qtard does not like can't be known.

    Like you cretin KNOW anything about that Navalny. ;-P

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\"You are"... what? Believer in propaganda? I'm not. I am a knower of facts.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    So. You are a "knower" now.

    So what??? With that you throwed aside false belief in "I believe facts", already???

    Naaaah.

    Cretin just trying to mimicry itself to be smart... by taking much smarter opponent as example.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\No, not in your eyes. In *my* eyes. Because I know the facts. Like the fact that donald tRump sent his magaturd minions to the Capitol to try and stop the certification of Joe Biden's legitimate win. He tried to get his VP to raise objections to electors in states where cheating was falsely alleged. So he could remain president. After he LOST.

    Yeah.

    You know propaganda chants very well. ;-P

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\Qtard: Because... that's what happens with tyrants all of the time -- there is sham court trials happen, and they going from one courts to another. Fighting in that court with their lawyers and counter-evidences.

    \\Yes. Tyrants do that. And Democracies do it too.

    Yeah. That's what cretin with totalitarian mind would said.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\Joe Biden is a tyrant? Even though he left it to his independent AG to decide? And that AG assigned the decision to an independent prosecutor. So the decision was twice removed from Joe Biden? Of COURSE Qtard would still claim the prosecution is at the direction of Joe Biden. Even though the facts say otherwise. But only because that is the false narrative it likes.

    Yeah. liliPut commenting it SAME way -- that he have NO influence over persecution of Navalny. And redirects everybody's question to a law-infrosers.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000


    \\Nobody is going stand in "awe" of "Demn-ok-ratsy". Because there is no such thing.

    Yeah. For now. And never will be... if dRump will win. ;-P

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\But Joe Biden is going to win, not lose.

    Yeah. That's the plan... of DEMN-OK-ratsy. ;-P

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000




    \\WHY would he be prosecuted? He didn't do anything he could be prosecuted for. Not that I'm aware of.

    Hah???

    He not took some security documents with himself???

    EVEN THOUGH his lawyers and HE HIMSELF admitted doing it...

    And as cretin tried to say -- admitting guilt -- is PERFECTLY ENOUGH... for persecution. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  13. Qtard: Yeah... only cretin could come up with such an idea.

    I agree with your admission re your cretinic idea.

    Qtard: That's why I listening to this cretin -- to observe how cretinic brains work.

    What are you going to do with that information about how your cretinic brain works?

    Qtard: Like you cretin KNOW anything about that Navalny.

    More than you.

    Qtard: So. You are a "knower" now.

    Always have been. Regarding facts I can verify for myself.

    Qtard: So what??? With that you throwed aside false belief in "I believe facts", already???

    That would be impossible. Because I have no such false belief.

    Qtard: Cretin just trying to mimicry itself to be smart... by taking much smarter opponent as example.

    But the cretin doesn't do that. It ridicules the much smarter opponent.

    Qtard: You know propaganda chants very well.

    Calling facts "propaganda" again. Yawn.

    Qtard: Yeah. That's what cretin with totalitarian mind would said.

    No. I was just giving you the facts regarding politicians being prosecuted for lawbreaking by democracies around the world.

    Qtard: Yeah. liliPut commenting it SAME way -- that he have NO influence over persecution of Navalny. And redirects everybody's question to a law-infrosers.

    So what?? What does that have to do with donald tRump's crimes?

    Qtard: \\"Demn-ok-ratsy"... there is no such thing\\ Yeah. For now. And never will be... if dRump will win.

    Then we will have fascism.

    Qtard: \\But Joe Biden is going to win, not lose\\ Yeah. That's the plan... of DEMN-OK-ratsy.

    No.

    Qtard: Hah??? He not took some security documents with himself??? EVEN THOUGH his lawyers and HE HIMSELF admitted doing it...

    Given back. Unlike with donald tRump who said "no, these are mine". Then tried to hide them.

    Qtard: And as cretin tried to say -- admitting guilt -- is PERFECTLY ENOUGH... for persecution.

    Joe Biden did not admit any guilt. He admitted he had the documents and gave them back immediately. If donald tRump had done that he would not have been charged.

    ReplyDelete
  14. \\ Ben Nuttenyahoo is the CURRENT PM. Maybe his opposition rigged it so he'd be prosecuted?

    \\Qtard: Yeah... only cretin could come up with such an idea.

    \\I agree with your admission re your cretinic idea.

    "Your" instead of "my".

    Because... it's obvious that "opposition rigged" something... is totally cretinic -- HOW'd they accomplish THAT?????!!! Without STATE POWER.



    \\What are you going to do with that information about how your cretinic brain works?

    YET ONE "Your" instead of "my".

    See... you are very informative. ;-P



    \\Qtard: Like you cretin KNOW anything about that Navalny.

    \\More than you.

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000


    \\Qtard: So. You are a "knower" now.

    \\Always have been. Regarding facts I can verify for myself.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    HOW?????

    If you cretin DUNNO what FACTS are even. ;-P




    \\Qtard: So what??? With that you throwed aside false belief in "I believe facts", already???

    \\That would be impossible. Because I have no such false belief.

    May I take it as firm renouncing of EARLIER many-many times repeated by cretin that it "believe facts", "believe in facts", "know all truth" and etc cretinic babbling???

    Naaaaah. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    That's just another cretinic lie.



    \\But the cretin doesn't do that. It ridicules the much smarter opponent.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000



    \\Qtard: You know propaganda chants very well.

    \\Calling facts "propaganda" again. Yawn.

    YET ONE admission of cretin that is DUNNO what facts is...

    Yawn.



    \\No. I was just giving you the facts regarding politicians being prosecuted for lawbreaking by democracies around the world.

    "DEMN-OK-ratsies" like liliPut's RFia and Xi's China???

    Yeah.

    Now it apparent -- what cretin think -- that Totalitarian Rule it's "democracy"... in it's rottened by totalitarian propaganda mind.



    \\Qtard: Yeah. liliPut commenting it SAME way -- that he have NO influence over persecution of Navalny. And redirects everybody's question to a law-infrosers.

    \\So what?? What does that have to do with donald tRump's crimes?

    DEMN cretin ALREADY forgot???

    That it tried to embelish Bi-den with it's claim that it do not influence persecution.

    Surely IT IS.

    And giving QUOTES would not help -- even though it just written it above.

    Because... cretin.

    Cannot be helped.

    Yawn.




    \\Qtard: \\"Demn-ok-ratsy"... there is no such thing\\ Yeah. For now. And never will be... if dRump will win.

    \\Then we will have fascism.

    Fascism???

    You meant to say National SOCIALISM? ;-P




    \\Qtard: \\But Joe Biden is going to win, not lose\\ Yeah. That's the plan... of DEMN-OK-ratsy.

    \\No.

    Definite NewSpeak "Yes". ;-P



    \\Given back. Unlike with donald tRump who said "no, these are mine". Then tried to hide them.

    All of em? ;-P



    \\Joe Biden did not admit any guilt. He admitted he had the documents...

    Yeah.

    YET ONE famous LYING tactic.

    Saying something... just to renounce it in NEXT sentence EVEN.

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00

    But... you are lying cretin not for nothing. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  15. Qtard: "Your" instead of "my".

    No.

    Qtard: Because... it's obvious that "opposition rigged" something... is totally cretinic -- HOW'd they accomplish THAT?????!!! Without STATE POWER.

    With the state power they HAVE. By being members of the government. But the totalitarian-lover Qtard thinks government naturally is always under the total control of the party of the leader.

    Qtard: \\What are you going to do with that information about how your cretinic brain works\\ YET ONE "Your" instead of "my".

    No.

    Qtard: Like you cretin KNOW anything about that Navalny\\ More than you\\ :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    Cretin laughs and drools when presented with obvious facts.

    Qtard: So. You are a "knower" now\\ Always have been. Regarding facts I can verify for myself\\ HOW????? If you cretin DUNNO what FACTS are even.

    There is no "if". You definitely dunno what facts are.

    Qtard: May I take it as firm renouncing of EARLIER many-many times repeated by cretin that it "believe facts", "believe in facts", "know all truth" and etc cretinic babbling???

    You never repeated that many times.

    Qtard: \\But the cretin doesn't do that. It ridicules the much smarter opponent\\ :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    See? Ridiculing of much smarter opponent with laughter.

    Qtard: You know propaganda chants very well\\ Calling facts "propaganda" again. Yawn\\ YET ONE admission of cretin that is DUNNO what facts is...

    But cretin dunno what the word "admission" or "admit" even means. But, yes, IT dunno what facts are.

    Qtard: "DEMN-OK-ratsies" like liliPut's RFia and Xi's China???

    Putin and Xi aren't Democrats. The Democratic party does not exist in Russia or China, cretin.

    Qtard: Now it apparent -- what cretin think -- that Totalitarian Rule it's "democracy"... in it's rottened by totalitarian propaganda mind.

    Yeah. It is apparent that is what YOU think. How do I know? Your insistence that the opposition (elected to government) is somehow not a part of government and has no government power (somehow).

    Qtard: ...it tried to embelish Bi-den with it's claim that it do not influence persecution.

    Yeah, I don't remember that. Because remembering things that never happened is impossible. I pointed out the fact that special counsel Jack Smith is twice removed from Biden. Independent counsel Jack Smith appointed by the independent AG Garland.

    Qtard: Surely IT IS.

    "It is" what?

    Qtard: And giving QUOTES would not help -- even though it just written it above.

    Because I did not just write it above.

    Qtard: Because... cretin.

    Yes, that is the reason. Your cretinism.

    Qtard's Cannot be helped.

    Obviously not.

    Qtard: Yawn.

    Qtard's cretinism bores even it.

    Qtard: \\"Demn-ok-ratsy"... there is no such thing\\ Yeah. For now. And never will be... if dRump will win\\ Then we will have fascism\\ Fascism??? You meant to say National SOCIALISM?

    No.

    Qtard: \\But Joe Biden is going to win, not lose\\ Yeah. That's the plan... of DEMN-OK-ratsy\\ No\\ Definite NewSpeak "Yes".

    Definitely not.

    Qtard: \\Given back. Unlike with donald tRump who said "no, these are mine". Then tried to hide them\\ All of em?

    All were asked to be returned. All were not returned.

    Qtard: \\Joe Biden did not admit any guilt. He admitted he had the documents...\\ Yeah. YET ONE famous LYING tactic. Saying something... just to renounce it in NEXT sentence EVEN.

    Didn't happen. Guilt proven by behavior of donald tRump who did not give back documents he stole when asked. While Joe Biden gave back documents he inadvertently kept immediately.

    Qtard's But... you are lying cretin not for nothing.

    Wrote "you" instead of "I".

    Qtard: Continue-continue, cretin.

    Self encouragement.

    ReplyDelete
  16. \\Qtard: Because... it's obvious that "opposition rigged" something... is totally cretinic -- HOW'd they accomplish THAT?????!!! Without STATE POWER.

    \\With the state power they HAVE.

    WAT???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: Like you cretin KNOW anything about that Navalny\\ More than you\\ :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    \\Cretin laughs and drools when presented with obvious facts.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00

    Yep.

    Cretin JUST YET ONE time confirmed that it thinks that its empty babbling is "obvious fact" -- total inability to get what FACTS is.

    But... it's natural... for cretins.

    Nothing surprising in it.

    Yawn.



    \\Qtard: So. You are a "knower" now\\ Always have been. Regarding facts I can verify for myself\\ HOW????? If you cretin DUNNO what FACTS are even.

    \\There is no "if". You definitely dunno what facts are.

    YET ONE confirmation of cretinism.

    Yawn.

    SELF-ADMITTED!!!

    Because.

    Look what correction cretin proposed? To remove "if". ;-P

    To make it "you cretin DUNNO what FACTS are even." :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    Than you for correction!

    Now I will stop adding conditional clauses.

    To admit you being complete cretin without any "ifs". ;-p




    \\Qtard: May I take it as firm renouncing of EARLIER many-many times repeated by cretin that it "believe facts", "believe in facts", "know all truth" and etc cretinic babbling???

    \\You never repeated that many times.

    Yeah.

    Thank you for confirmation -- that that is YOU... is that cretin that repeated that BS ad nauseous. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))




    \\Qtard: \\But the cretin doesn't do that. It ridicules the much smarter opponent\\ :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000

    \\See? Ridiculing of much smarter opponent with laughter.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00

    Continue-continue, cretin, ridiculing itself... with trying to call itself smart. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    That's... most hilarious. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0


    \\But, yes, IT dunno what facts are.

    Admission! ;-P

    IT... admitted calling itself IT is O.K.

    And IT... admits... what ALREADY confirmed as fact -- that it dunno what facts is.

    EVEN... after it was explained to IT.

    That FACTS -- are just parts of Reality. ;-)

    Easy to grasp, isn't it? But IT -- certain one cretin -- still CANNOT get it. ;-P



    \\But cretin dunno what the word "admission" or "admit" even means.

    Yeah.

    That same cretin. That cited dictionary definition of that "admit"... just to state TOTALLY OPPOSITE. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Cretin unable to parse dictionary definitions? ;-P


    \\Putin and Xi aren't Democrats. The Democratic party does not exist in Russia or China, cretin.

    Yep.

    Cretin YET oNE time CONFIRMED that for IT "democracy" it's "rule of democrats". ;-P




    \\Qtard: Now it apparent -- what cretin think -- that Totalitarian Rule it's "democracy"... in it's rottened by totalitarian propaganda mind.

    \\Yeah.

    Admission! ;-P



    \\Yeah, I don't remember that. Because remembering things that never happened is impossible.

    Yeah?

    Like when you do not remember that you said "I did not remember"?

    It "never happened"??? Because you "do not remember" it????? :-)))))))))))))))))))0

    What a cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0000

    ReplyDelete
  17. Qtard: \\But, yes, IT dunno what facts are\\ Admission!

    YES! Yours. You are "it". I am "he". I don't identify as an "it". Yet you keep referring to "it". I assume you are talking about yourself.

    Qtard: IT... admitted calling itself IT is O.K.

    See. My assumption was correct.

    Qtard: And IT... admits... what ALREADY confirmed as fact -- that it dunno what facts is.

    Self referring talks.

    Qtard: That FACTS -- are just parts of Reality.

    How would you know?

    Qtard: Easy to grasp, isn't it? But IT -- certain one cretin -- still CANNOT get it. ;-P

    See? It just admitted IT does not know. Even though it is easy to grasp.

    Qtard: \\But cretin dunno what the word "admission" or "admit" even means\\Yeah. That same cretin. That cited dictionary definition of that "admit"... just to state TOTALLY OPPOSITE.

    No.

    Qtard: Cretin unable to parse dictionary definitions? ;-P

    Yes. IT obviously isn't able to.

    Qtard: Cretin YET oNE time CONFIRMED that for IT "democracy" it's "rule of democrats".

    No, you are wrong. Many other countries are democracies which don't have a political "Democratic Party".

    Qtard: Now it apparent -- what cretin think -- that Totalitarian Rule it's "democracy"... in it's rottened by totalitarian propaganda mind\\Yeah\\ Admission!

    You said that is what the cretin thinks. You are the cretin admitting that is what you think. I agree with your admission.

    Qtard: Like when you do not remember that you said "I did not remember"?

    No, because that didn't happen. I said I remembered writing that I didn't remember writing "in" one time. I still remember. I never said I forgot.

    ReplyDelete
  18. \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...

    \\ Qtard: \\But, yes, IT dunno what facts are\\ Admission!

    \\ YES! Yours. You are "it". I am "he". I don't identify as an "it". Yet you keep referring to "it". I assume you are talking about yourself.

    But it... do not corroborate with facts.;-P

    Numerous facts when you cretin showed that you "dunno what facts are".

    After I. As much smarter opponent tried to explain it... to IT. But IT... unable to learn.

    And I call you "IT"... because of many-many times claimed that YOUR OWN WORDS are "I never said it"... even though it written under Blogger Dervish Sanders account.

    Which... as I suggested -- could mean having alter-egos. Split personality disorder.

    And THAT.

    Is in ALL ACCORDANCE with open and obvious facts... frozen in place, here in this blog -- of all cretinic babbling of that certain one cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))

    See.

    All is perfectly logical. ;-P

    Ah.

    But, sorry.

    You are cretin. And cannot grasp what Facts and Logic are. :-))))))))))))))))))))



    \\See. My assumption was correct.

    Yeah.

    Definite behavior of cretin... you showed -- "confirmation" of own factless babbling... with just some MORE factless babbling.

    Yawn. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: That FACTS -- are just parts of Reality.

    \\How would you know?

    Yeah.

    IT cannot grasp it.

    Cause -- cretin.

    Yawn.



    \\Qtard: Cretin unable to parse dictionary definitions? ;-P

    \\Yes. IT obviously isn't able to.

    Yep.

    And IT... admitted it. ;-P

    Yawn.



    \\Qtard: Cretin YET oNE time CONFIRMED that for IT "democracy" it's "rule of democrats".

    \\No, you are wrong. Many other countries are democracies which don't have a political "Democratic Party".

    Yep.

    Non-logocal retort. :-)))))))))))))))))))))0000000




    \\Qtard: Like when you do not remember that you said "I did not remember"?

    \\No, because that didn't happen.

    See. ;-P

    How can you think that something "didn't happen", even if it FIXED in place as an evidance (your crazy and cretinic babbling in this blog).

    Because you DO NOT remember.

    That is what "not remembering" is about. ;-P

    And that is -- FACTUAL CONFIRMATION... of your forgetfulness, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))0



    \\I said I remembered writing that I didn't remember writing "in" one time. I still remember. I never said I forgot.

    Yeah.

    Even though FACT was presented.

    That have written that "in".

    And NOT for "just one time". ;-P

    Means. You are LIAR. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mystere: Dervish Sanders is a warmonger.

    Lie. I'm strongly opposed to war.

    Qtard: \\But, yes, IT dunno what facts are\\ Admission! \\ YES! Yours. You are "it". I am "he". I don't identify as an "it". Yet you keep referring to "it". I assume you are talking about yourself\\ But it... do not corroborate with facts.;-P

    It does.

    Qtard: Numerous facts when you cretin showed that you "dunno what facts are".

    Your comment is accurate only if "you" is replaced with "me".

    Qtard: After I. As much smarter opponent tried to explain it... to IT. But IT... unable to learn.

    Much dumber opponent tried to teach the much smarter opponent why only what it says are facts are facts. I wisely ignored the much dumber opponent's attempts to gaslight me.

    Qtard: And I call you "IT"... because of many-many times claimed that YOUR OWN WORDS are "I never said it"... even though it written under Blogger Dervish Sanders account.

    No. No such claims have ever been written under "blogger Dervish Sanders account". And you called me "it" before you started lying about me claiming I never said my own words. So that is a lie.

    Qtard: Which... as I suggested -- could mean having alter-egos. Split personality disorder.

    You? I know I don't have multiple personalities.

    Qtard: And THAT. Is in ALL ACCORDANCE with open and obvious facts...

    It isn't.

    Qtard: ...frozen in place, here in this blog -- of all cretinic babbling of that certain one cretin.

    Your cretinic babbling. Yes.

    Qtard: See. All is perfectly logical.

    Completely illogical.

    Qtard: Ah. But, sorry. You are cretin. And cannot grasp what Facts and Logic are.

    I can. You cannot. Proven by you describing your lies as "perfectly logical".

    Qtard: \\See. My assumption was correct\\ Yeah. Definite behavior of cretin... you showed -- "confirmation" of own factless babbling... with just some MORE factless babbling.

    Self referring talks.

    Qtard: That FACTS -- are just parts of Reality\\ How would you know?\\ Yeah. IT cannot grasp it. Cause -- cretin. Yawn.

    You (it) can't grasp it? I believe you.

    Qtard: Cretin unable to parse dictionary definitions?\\ Yes. IT obviously isn't able to\\ Yep. And IT... admitted it.

    "It" did. "It" being YOU. As I have already said (many times) I am not an "it".

    Qtard: Cretin YET oNE time CONFIRMED that for IT "democracy" it's "rule of democrats"\\ No, you are wrong. Many other countries are democracies which don't have a political "Democratic Party"\\ Yep. Non-logocal retort.

    One example of how IT is unable to grasp logic.

    Qtard: Like when you do not remember that you said "I did not remember"? \\No, because that didn't happen\\ See.

    That you lie? Yes, I see that.

    Qtard: How can you think that something "didn't happen", even if it FIXED in place as an evidance (your crazy and cretinic babbling in this blog).

    Because it is not. Words I never wrote cannot possibly be "fixed in place as an evidance".

    Qtard: Because you DO NOT remember.

    I do remember.

    Qtard: That is what "not remembering" is about.

    It isn't.

    Qtard: And that is -- FACTUAL CONFIRMATION... of your forgetfulness, cretin.

    No.

    QtardL \\I said I remembered writing that I didn't remember writing "in" one time. I still remember. I never said I forgot\\ Yeah. Even though FACT was presented. That have written that "in". And NOT for "just one time".

    It was not. And I said I didn't remember (the one time) BEFORE you "presented" it.

    Qtard: Means. You are LIAR.

    Wrote "you" instead of "I". Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  20. \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...

    \\ Mystere: Dervish Sanders is a warmonger.

    \\ Lie. I'm strongly opposed to war.

    Yeah.

    By calling Ukrainians "nazis". And on that base not deserving help.

    Following DEMN Propaganda.




    \\Qtard: \\But, yes, IT dunno what facts are\\ Admission! \\ YES! Yours. You are "it". I am "he". I don't identify as an "it". Yet you keep referring to "it". I assume you are talking about yourself\\ But it... do not corroborate with facts.;-P

    \\It does.

    Yeah???

    Then you must be able to SHOW that facts.

    And EXPLAIN that logic.

    But you can't. ;-P

    Cause you are cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    And as cretin... you only tried to dissuade any need for facts/quotes and explanations. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: Numerous facts when you cretin showed that you "dunno what facts are".

    \\Your comment is accurate only if "you" is replaced with "me".

    Yeah.

    Accurately devoid of any factual base and any logical meaning.

    As all of your miserly babbling, cretin. ;-P

    But.

    You are free to parrot this my words. Be my guest.

    But.

    Cretin do not do that. Why???

    Isn't that it FEARS that mere words. ;-P

    Fact. And especially Logic.

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0



    \\Qtard: After I. As much smarter opponent tried to explain it... to IT. But IT... unable to learn.

    \\Much dumber opponent tried to teach the much smarter opponent why only what it says are facts are facts. I wisely ignored the much dumber opponent's attempts to gaslight me.

    Yeah.

    Perfect example of cretinism of a definite cretin. As it DO NOT provide quote where *I* would said anything like "only what it says are facts are facts". Because... that is what IT only doing. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Thank you.

    I'll add this to statistic. ;-P




    ReplyDelete
  21. \\Qtard: And I call you "IT"... because of many-many times claimed that YOUR OWN WORDS are "I never said it"... even though it written under Blogger Dervish Sanders account.

    \\No. No such claims have ever been written under "blogger Dervish Sanders account". And you called me "it" before you started lying about me claiming I never said my own words. So that is a lie.

    Just in this thread. ;-P

    ""I never said I forgot.

    February 11, 2024 at 2:58 PM""

    AND.

    "Qtard: ...it tried to embelish Bi-den with it's claim that it do not influence persecution.

    Yeah, I don't remember that."

    AND HERE.

    "Qtard: Like when you do not remember that you said "I did not remember"?

    No, because that didn't happen. I said I remembered writing that I didn't remember writing "in" one time. I still remember. I never said I forgot.

    February 11, 2024 at 2:58 PM"

    Where YOU... with your OWN WORDS said that you "remember not remembering". ;-P

    Means.

    YOU admitted that you FORGOT. ;-P

    But.

    Now you... alogically. Trying to claim "I never said I forgot."

    Too obvious of a lies.

    Happen all of the time.

    Because you are mindless cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  22. \\Qtard: Which... as I suggested -- could mean having alter-egos. Split personality disorder.

    \\You? I know I don't have multiple personalities.

    Pft!

    That's EXACTLY what people with split personalities disorder DO SAY.

    That they KNOW... that they do not have em. ;-P

    Ha.

    You just KEEP confirming having it. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: And THAT. Is in ALL ACCORDANCE with open and obvious facts...

    \\It isn't.

    Direct lie against FACTS provided. ;-P

    That's why you are cretin. And liar.

    And EACH SUCH obvious lie just keep proving it. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    But.

    You, as cretin, cannot help it -- and only continue lying. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0



    \\Your cretinic babbling. Yes.

    And that is your expert's opinion... as cretin???? :-)))))))))))))))))))00

    I agree with that -- that you are can be (self-proclaimed) expert in cretinism... on the base being cretin... itself. ;-P



    \\Qtard: See. All is perfectly logical.

    \\Completely illogical.

    Yeah.

    Yet one of that totally cretinic event -- when cretin trying to use words it as cretin do not understand. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  23. \\Qtard: Ah. But, sorry. You are cretin. And cannot grasp what Facts and Logic are.

    \\I can. You cannot. Proven by you describing your lies as "perfectly logical".

    And what logical base???

    Behind such boasting, ahhh???

    Some facts/quotes? Some logical conclusions?

    Naaaah.

    Just MOAR factless babbling of mindless cretin -- that confirms ITS cretinism, of IT.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\"It" did. "It" being YOU. As I have already said (many times) I am not an "it".

    Yeah.


    Just MOAR factless babbling of mindless cretin -- that confirms ITS cretinism, of IT.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))




    \\One example of how IT is unable to grasp logic.

    Just MOAR factless babbling of mindless cretin -- that confirms ITS cretinism, of IT.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))




    \\Because it is not. Words I never wrote cannot possibly be "fixed in place as an evidance".

    Just MOAR factless babbling of mindless cretin -- that confirms ITS cretinism, of IT.

    But.

    Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: Because you DO NOT remember.

    \\I do remember.

    That you said "I do not remember"? ;-P



    ReplyDelete
  24. Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    PS Yeah. I encourage you to use your cretinic retort "Self-encouragement" here too.

    For more lulz! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete