Since the NFL has trademarked a certain Football Championship's name, the Superb Owl Festival has been established, celebrated, and is being featured in certain off-brand advertising messages and posts like this one, So have a Happy Superb Owl Sunday, folks!
btw - In Trademarking the championship's name, does anyone NOT believe that the NFL had both an "agenda" AND a desire to control the Narrative surrounding its' use? So join the corporate globalist oh-cult today! Sponsor a Superb Owl Party at half-time TODAY! ps- Our Owlish logo below isn't trademarked!
The highlight of the game will be when Taylor Swift endorses Joe Biden? :P
ReplyDeleteIndeed!
ReplyDeleteThe game is being fixed by Joe Biden and Barack Obama... says tinfoil hat brigade member, Minus FJ.
ReplyDeleteDervish has really flipped the lid this time and gone ape-wol 🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉
DeleteMystere thinks NOT believing tinfoil hat nuttery is "going ape-wol". Of course. That isn't surprising at all.
Delete∆Dervish∆∆
Deletekeeps hallucinating, seeing Mystere when Mystere is not around. He has gone beyond "ape-wol" 🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Joe, those owl pictures are quite funny!😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
ReplyDeleteHedwig wins AGAIN! I swear, the fix is IN!
ReplyDeletebtw - If I'm a member, meet the Non compos mentis president of the tinfoil hat brigaide...
ReplyDeleteSaul Alinsky, "Rules for Radicals"
ReplyDeleteRule 31 - The Rules. "Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."
Minus: btw - If I'm a member, meet the Non compos mentis president of the tinfoil hat brigaide...
ReplyDeleteWrong link. Here is the correct one.
Mystere is hallucinating. He keeps claiming he "isn't around" because he posts using his Rattrapper or Q-Tardo accounts. He thinks people are being successfully fooled when nobody is.
You sure?
ReplyDeleteWhat I want to know is why, when dotard donald offered Nikki Haley 10k national guard troops to guard the Capitol on J6, Nikki Haley said no. Maybe she said, "ask Nancy Pelosi"? But we all know that dotard donald never asked Nancy Pelosi that question.
ReplyDeleteNancy Pelosi wasn't responsible for Capitol security on J6? Nancy didn't want troops to protect it. She couldn't have pulled off her Parliamentary Emergency needed to block objections to her fake electors.
ReplyDeleteNo. Nikki Haley was. That's according to dotard donald.
ReplyDeleteThe fake electors were blocked by Mike Pence. Why dotard donald sent his minions to the Capitol. They wanted to replace Pence with Grassley who would steal the election for tRump.
Again the literalist. You're such a card, Dervy.
ReplyDeleteAnd Pence couldn't be questioned on the status of Electors, all thanks to Nancy and the "emergency" parliamentary procedure adjourning the session.
You're just upset that the rightturd plan to steal the presidency for donald tRump failed.
ReplyDelete"Again the literalist. You're such a card, Dervy".
What a lame dismissal of the evidence of dotard donald's growing dementia.
Well, I still think he should go to prison. He definitely is not a sympathetic old man.
Challenging electors is stealing? The Democrats did it in every election leading up to 2020.
ReplyDeleteSo why didn't Al Gore serve as the 43rd president? Given your belief that Nancy Pelosi had to instigate the mob of tRump supporters via a "fedsurrection" to stop dotard donald from winning.
ReplyDeleteSo why didn't Al Gore serve as the 43rd president?
ReplyDeleteHe's a pussy?
In 2000, Vice President Al Gore won the popular vote by a margin of about 544,000, but lost the electoral vote 271-267 after the controversial Florida recount. Though many Democrats believed Gore to be the legitimate winner, he conceded defeat in December following the Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore. Several members of the House attempted to object to certification, but Gore — in his role as presiding officer — rejected these attempts.
ReplyDeleteSo is Sleepy Joe...
ReplyDeleteHillary Clinton’s defeat by Donald Trump in 2016 — with Trump winning a comfortable 306-232 Electoral College majority but losing the popular vote by nearly 2.9 million — led to a grassroots effort to deny Trump the presidency by convincing electors to vote for other candidates. In the end, just seven electors voted for candidates other than Clinton or Trump— and five of them were Clinton electors, with the official tally being a 304-227 Trump win. As in 2000, House Democrats tried to challenge, but lacked Senate support. Vice President Joe Biden, presiding, told one representative, “It is over.”
But there was no insurrection. So the objections should have been successful and Al Gore should have become president. That is how you say tRump would have won. If tRump would have won, why wouldn't Gore have won?
ReplyDeleteSeveral members of the House attempted to object to certification, but Pence — in his role as presiding officer — rejected these attempts.
Al Gore is a corrupt politician, and got defeated in 2000, fair and square. You still licking your wounds from 2000, Dervish? Get over it, ∆$$£∆¢€ D€rp¡$h b¡n~§atan~§ander$666. Your dork al-Gore let Slimy Bubba Clinton get away with all the vile things he disgraced the Oval Office with by not trying to stop him. Your ¡doltß will be crashing soon ∆$$£∆¢€ Dertvißh b¡n~§atan~§ander$666.
Delete\\Blogger -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...
ReplyDelete\\ Again the literalist. You're such a card, Dervy.
Naaah... just a cretinic simpleton.
Nothing apart most simplest explanation can fit its minuscule brain. ;-P
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Well, I still think he should go to prison.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
What a stark development.
At first you was DEMN sure... that it is criminal, and will be in jail -- which is totally against Presumption of Innocence.
Then... just that you are DEMN sure... that it MUST be judged guilty.
And now... you just stating opinion.
What's happened??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
This way you sound less cretinic. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But.
Continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Nothing apart most simplest explanation can fit its minuscule brain.
ReplyDeleteSelf referring talks.
Qtard: At first you was DEMN sure... that it is criminal, and will be in jail...
Yes.
Qtard: ...which is totally against Presumption of Innocence.
No.
Qtard: Then... just that you are DEMN sure...
No.
Qtard: that it MUST be judged guilty.
He must.
Qtard: And now... you just stating opinion.
As always. Not only now, but every time previously.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: Nothing apart most simplest explanation can fit its minuscule brain.
\\ Self referring talks.
Yeah. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))0
And quite recursive to boot. ;-P (yet one word for cretin to stumble on).
I said: "...ITS minuscule brain"... and YOU self-referring to it. ;-P
\\As always. Not only now, but every time previously.
Yeah.
I agree.
Your opinions are miserly dumbfounded and cretinic... as ever. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: I said: "...ITS minuscule brain"... and YOU self-referring to it.
ReplyDelete"It" is you. I am "he". We established that previously.
Qtard: Your opinions are miserly dumbfounded and cretinic... as ever.
Wrote "your" instead of "my". Well, that isn't new. IT often talks about me when it's words clearly apply to itself.
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
ReplyDeletePS Yeah. I encourage you to use your cretinic retort "Self-encouragement" here too.
For more lulz! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))